A scoping review and survey provides the rationale, perceptions, and preferences for the integration of randomized and nonrandomized studies in evidence syntheses and GRADE assessments

To review the literature and obtain preferences and perceptions from experts regarding the role of randomized studies (RSs) and nonrandomized studies (NRSs) in systematic reviews of intervention effects. Scoping review and survey of experts. Using levels of certainty developed by the Grading of Reco...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Journal of clinical epidemiology Vol. 98; pp. 33 - 40
Main Authors:	Cuello-Garcia, Carlos A., Morgan, Rebecca L., Brozek, Jan, Santesso, Nancy, Verbeek, Jos, Thayer, Kris, Guyatt, Gordon, Schünemann, Holger J.
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	United States Elsevier Inc 01.06.2018 Elsevier Limited
Subjects:	Adult Aged Attitude of Health Personnel Bias Causality Clinical practice guidelines Epidemiology Evaluation Evidence-Based Practice - standards Evidence-Based Practice - statistics & numerical data Experts Female GRADE GRADE Approach Health promotion Humans Knowledge Literature reviews Male Meta-Analysis as Topic Middle Aged Minority & ethnic groups Non-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - statistics & numerical data Nonrandomized trials Polls & surveys Public health Quality Randomization Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - statistics & numerical data Randomized trials Research methodology Subgroups Surveys and Questionnaires Systematic review Systematic reviews Systematic reviews Clinical practice guidelines GRADE Randomized trials Research methodology Nonrandomized trials
ISSN:	0895-4356, 1878-5921, 1878-5921
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Be the first to leave a comment!