Live process modeling with the BPMN Sketch Miner

BPMN Sketch Miner is a modeling environment for generating visual business process models starting from constrained natural language textual input. Its purpose is to support business process modelers who need to rapidly sketch visual BPMN models during interviews and design workshops, where particip...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Software and systems modeling Vol. 21; no. 5; pp. 1877 - 1906
Main Authors:	Ivanchikj, Ana, Serbout, Souhaila, Pautasso, Cesare
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.10.2022 Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:	Benchmarks Compilers Computer Science Environment models Exports Flow distribution Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet) Interpreters IT in Business Keywords Language Natural language Performance evaluation Programming Languages Programming Techniques Software Software Engineering Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems Special Section Paper Synchronism Usability User experience Workloads Process mining Performance evaluation Domain-specific languages Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN)
ISSN:	1619-1366, 1619-1374, 1619-1374
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Abstract	BPMN Sketch Miner is a modeling environment for generating visual business process models starting from constrained natural language textual input. Its purpose is to support business process modelers who need to rapidly sketch visual BPMN models during interviews and design workshops, where participants should not only provide input but also give feedback on whether the sketched visual model represents accurately what has been described during the discussion. In this article, we present a detailed description of the BPMN Sketch Miner design decisions and list the different control flow patterns supported by the current version of its textual DSL. We also summarize the user study and survey results originally published in MODELS 2020 concerning the tool usability and learnability and present a new performance evaluation regarding the visual model generation pipeline under actual usage conditions. The goal is to determine whether it can support a rapid model editing cycle, with live synchronization between the textual description and the visual model. This study is based on a benchmark including a large number of models (1350 models) exported by users of the tool during the year 2020. The main results indicate that the performance is sufficient for a smooth live modeling user experience and that the end-to-end execution time of the text-to-model-to-visual pipeline grows linearly with the model size, up to the largest models (with 195 lines of textual description) found in the benchmark workload.
AbstractList	BPMN Sketch Miner is a modeling environment for generating visual business process models starting from constrained natural language textual input. Its purpose is to support business process modelers who need to rapidly sketch visual BPMN models during interviews and design workshops, where participants should not only provide input but also give feedback on whether the sketched visual model represents accurately what has been described during the discussion. In this article, we present a detailed description of the BPMN Sketch Miner design decisions and list the different control flow patterns supported by the current version of its textual DSL. We also summarize the user study and survey results originally published in MODELS 2020 concerning the tool usability and learnability and present a new performance evaluation regarding the visual model generation pipeline under actual usage conditions. The goal is to determine whether it can support a rapid model editing cycle, with live synchronization between the textual description and the visual model. This study is based on a benchmark including a large number of models (1350 models) exported by users of the tool during the year 2020. The main results indicate that the performance is sufficient for a smooth live modeling user experience and that the end-to-end execution time of the text-to-model-to-visual pipeline grows linearly with the model size, up to the largest models (with 195 lines of textual description) found in the benchmark workload. BPMN Sketch Miner is a modeling environment for generating visual business process models starting from constrained natural language textual input. Its purpose is to support business process modelers who need to rapidly sketch visual BPMN models during interviews and design workshops, where participants should not only provide input but also give feedback on whether the sketched visual model represents accurately what has been described during the discussion. In this article, we present a detailed description of the BPMN Sketch Miner design decisions and list the different control flow patterns supported by the current version of its textual DSL. We also summarize the user study and survey results originally published in MODELS 2020 concerning the tool usability and learnability and present a new performance evaluation regarding the visual model generation pipeline under actual usage conditions. The goal is to determine whether it can support a rapid model editing cycle, with live synchronization between the textual description and the visual model. This study is based on a benchmark including a large number of models (1350 models) exported by users of the tool during the year 2020. The main results indicate that the performance is sufficient for a smooth live modeling user experience and that the end-to-end execution time of the text-to-model-to-visual pipeline grows linearly with the model size, up to the largest models (with 195 lines of textual description) found in the benchmark workload.BPMN Sketch Miner is a modeling environment for generating visual business process models starting from constrained natural language textual input. Its purpose is to support business process modelers who need to rapidly sketch visual BPMN models during interviews and design workshops, where participants should not only provide input but also give feedback on whether the sketched visual model represents accurately what has been described during the discussion. In this article, we present a detailed description of the BPMN Sketch Miner design decisions and list the different control flow patterns supported by the current version of its textual DSL. We also summarize the user study and survey results originally published in MODELS 2020 concerning the tool usability and learnability and present a new performance evaluation regarding the visual model generation pipeline under actual usage conditions. The goal is to determine whether it can support a rapid model editing cycle, with live synchronization between the textual description and the visual model. This study is based on a benchmark including a large number of models (1350 models) exported by users of the tool during the year 2020. The main results indicate that the performance is sufficient for a smooth live modeling user experience and that the end-to-end execution time of the text-to-model-to-visual pipeline grows linearly with the model size, up to the largest models (with 195 lines of textual description) found in the benchmark workload.
Author	Ivanchikj, Ana Serbout, Souhaila Pautasso, Cesare
Author_xml	– sequence: 1 givenname: Ana surname: Ivanchikj fullname: Ivanchikj, Ana organization: Software Institute, USI – sequence: 2 givenname: Souhaila orcidid: 0000-0002-8144-2606 surname: Serbout fullname: Serbout, Souhaila email: souhaila.serbout@usi.ch organization: Software Institute, USI – sequence: 3 givenname: Cesare surname: Pautasso fullname: Pautasso, Cesare organization: Software Institute, USI
BookMark	eNp9kU1PGzEQhi0EEmngD3BaqRcuC_5aO75UahEflRJAgrvl2LOJ6cYO9oaIf49DUqpy4DSj8fO-49H7De2HGAChE4LPCMbyPBNMJa4xpTUuA1Wv99CACKJqwiTf_-iFOETHOfspxpwqxYUYIDz2L1AtU7SQc7WIDjofZtXa9_Oqn0P1635yWz38gd7Oq4kPkI7QQWu6DMe7OkSPV5ePFzf1-O7698XPcW15Q_raYCcbaiVgzrjkRLaiFcpyp4RgjRuRKWZl5KwTBPjUCgPEto1rlBk5wGyIfmxtl6vpApyF0CfT6WXyC5NedTRe__8S_FzP4otWDW2YosXgdGeQ4vMKcq8XPlvoOhMgrrKmkhLBJCYb9Psn9CmuUijXFYqoRhHGeaFGW8qmmHOCVlvfm97HzX7faYL1Jg29TUOXNPR7GnpdpPST9O8dX4rYVpQLHGaQ_v3qC9UbE8aenQ
CitedBy_id	crossref_primary_10_3390_fi16100353
Cites_doi	10.1007/978-3-642-28616-2 10.1007/978-3-642-32355-3_5 10.1109/LIVE.2013.6617346 10.1145/2240236.2240257 10.1049/iet-sen.2017.0144 10.1145/175276.175282 10.1108/14637150710721131 10.1145/3365438.3410990 10.1002/1097-024X(200009)30:11<1203::AID-SPE338>3.0.CO;2-N 10.1145/2541928.2541937 10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_19 10.1007/978-3-030-26643-1_1 10.1007/978-3-642-21640-4_36 10.1007/978-3-540-69100-6_12 10.1145/1869542.1869625 10.1109/ICPC.2013.6613831 10.1007/978-3-030-11641-5_11 10.1007/978-3-642-15915-2_7 10.1007/978-3-030-33223-5_14 10.1145/3149572.3149584 10.1007/978-3-540-69534-9_35 10.1145/2814251.2814253 10.1016/j.jss.2011.09.023 10.1007/978-3-642-40176-3_14 10.1145/203241.203251 10.1109/SBES.2015.12 10.1007/978-3-642-33666-9_4 10.1007/978-3-319-73117-9_3 10.1109/ICSE-C.2017.126 10.1007/978-3-642-21732-6_14 10.1007/978-3-642-31095-9_5 10.1007/978-3-030-73959-1_19 10.1109/SERVICES.2007.52 10.1109/EDOCW.2019.00027 10.1109/COMPSAC51774.2021.00117 10.1007/978-3-319-59144-5_3 10.1007/978-3-540-75209-7_26 10.1007/978-3-030-21290-2_23 10.1016/S1045-926X(05)80036-9 10.1109/ESEM.2011.25 10.1007/978-3-319-99365-2_8 10.1007/s10664-020-09835-6 10.1145/223904.223928 10.1007/978-3-642-21643-5_14 10.7551/mitpress/8085.001.0001 10.5220/0006305902500261 10.1007/978-3-642-16145-2_14 10.1007/978-3-642-36754-0_5 10.1109/32.31370 10.1007/978-3-642-19345-3 10.1007/s11219-015-9299-x 10.1109/RCIS.2015.7128860 10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.044 10.1023/A:1022883727209 10.1007/978-3-319-07869-4_17
ContentType	Journal Article
Copyright	The Author(s) 2022 The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. The Author(s) 2022.
Copyright_xml	– notice: The Author(s) 2022 – notice: The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: The Author(s) 2022.
DBID	C6C AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7SC 7XB 8AL 8AO 8FD 8FE 8FG 8FK ABUWG AFKRA ARAPS AZQEC BENPR BGLVJ CCPQU DWQXO GNUQQ HCIFZ JQ2 K7- L7M L~C L~D M0N P5Z P62 PHGZM PHGZT PKEHL PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7X8 5PM
DOI	10.1007/s10270-022-01009-w
DatabaseName	SpringerOpen CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Computer and Information Systems Abstracts ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Computing Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Advanced Technologies & Computer Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials - QC ProQuest Central ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Computer Science Collection Computer Science Database Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional Computing Database Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic (retired) ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Basic MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle	CrossRef Computer Science Database ProQuest Central Student Technology Collection Technology Research Database Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Computer Science Collection Computer and Information Systems Abstracts ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Central (New) Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Computing ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Computing (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest SciTech Collection Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic (New) MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList	CrossRef Computer Science Database MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml	– sequence: 1 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod	fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline	Computer Science
EISSN	1619-1374
EndPage	1906
ExternalDocumentID	PMC9525392 10_1007_s10270_022_01009_w
GrantInformation_xml	– fundername: Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung grantid: 184692 funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001711 – fundername: ; grantid: 184692
GroupedDBID	-59 -5G -BR -EM -Y2 -~C .4S .86 .DC .VR 06D 0R~ 0VY 123 1N0 203 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2LR 2P1 2VQ 2~H 30V 3V. 4.4 406 408 409 40D 40E 5VS 67Z 6NX 8AO 8FE 8FG 8TC 95- 95. 95~ 96X AAAVM AABHQ AACDK AAHNG AAIAL AAJBT AAJKR AANZL AARHV AARTL AASML AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAYIU AAYOK AAYQN AAYTO AAYZH ABAKF ABBBX ABBXA ABDBF ABDZT ABECU ABFTD ABFTV ABHLI ABHQN ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABKTR ABMNI ABMQK ABNWP ABQBU ABQSL ABSXP ABTEG ABTHY ABTKH ABTMW ABULA ABUWG ABWNU ABXPI ACAOD ACBXY ACDTI ACGFS ACHSB ACHXU ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACOKC ACOMO ACPIV ACSNA ACUHS ACZOJ ADHHG ADHIR ADINQ ADKNI ADKPE ADMLS ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADZKW AEBTG AEFQL AEGAL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEKMD AEMSY AENEX AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AETLH AEVLU AEXYK AFBBN AFGCZ AFKRA AFLOW AFQWF AFWTZ AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGJBK AGMZJ AGQEE AGQMX AGRTI AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHSBF AHYZX AIAKS AIGIU AIIXL AILAN AITGF AJBLW AJRNO AJZVZ ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALWAN AMKLP AMTXH AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR AOCGG ARAPS ARCSS ARMRJ ASPBG AVWKF AXYYD AYJHY AZFZN AZQEC B-. B0M BA0 BDATZ BENPR BGLVJ BGNMA BPHCQ BSONS C6C CAG CCPQU COF CS3 CSCUP DDRTE DL5 DNIVK DPUIP DU5 DWQXO EAD EAP EBLON EBS EDO EIOEI EJD EMK EPL ESBYG ESX FEDTE FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FWDCC GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNUQQ GNWQR GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GXS H13 HCIFZ HF~ HG5 HG6 HLICF HMJXF HQYDN HRMNR HVGLF HZ~ I-F I09 IHE IJ- IKXTQ ITM IWAJR IXC IXE IZIGR IZQ I~X I~Z J-C J0Z JBSCW JCJTX JZLTJ K6V K7- KDC KOV LAS LLZTM M0N M4Y MA- N2Q NB0 NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O9- O93 O9J OAM P62 P9O PF0 PQQKQ PROAC PT4 Q2X QOS R89 R9I RIG RNS ROL RPX RSV S16 S1Z S27 S3B SAP SCO SDH SHX SISQX SJYHP SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW STPWE SZN T13 TSG TSK TSV TUC TUS U2A UG4 UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW W23 W48 WK8 YLTOR Z45 Z5O Z7R Z7S Z7X Z7Z Z81 Z83 Z88 ZMTXR ~8M AAPKM AAYXX ABBRH ABDBE ABFSG ABRTQ ACSTC ADHKG AEZWR AFDZB AFFHD AFHIU AFOHR AGQPQ AHPBZ AHWEU AIXLP ATHPR AYFIA CITATION PHGZM PHGZT PQGLB 7SC 7XB 8AL 8FD 8FK JQ2 L7M L~C L~D PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7X8 5PM
ID	FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-a0d752c7e04347417f6f69c4d96635d81b03f6fdcd61e4bc6ae1cf5d59a8de03
IEDL.DBID	RSV
ISICitedReferencesCount	3
ISICitedReferencesURI	http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000817829400001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN	1619-1366 1619-1374
IngestDate	Tue Nov 04 02:06:57 EST 2025 Sun Nov 09 10:11:20 EST 2025 Wed Nov 05 01:36:05 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 04:10:45 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:27:05 EST 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:44:29 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess	true
IsOpenAccess	true
IsPeerReviewed	true
IsScholarly	true
Issue	5
Keywords	Process mining Performance evaluation Domain-specific languages Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN)
Language	English
License	Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
LinkModel	DirectLink
MergedId	FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c451t-a0d752c7e04347417f6f69c4d96635d81b03f6fdcd61e4bc6ae1cf5d59a8de03
Notes	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 Communicated by S. Abrahão, E. Syriani, H. Sahraoui, and J. de Lara.
ORCID	0000-0002-8144-2606
OpenAccessLink	https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10270-022-01009-w
PQID	2719591344
PQPubID	43171
PageCount	30
ParticipantIDs	pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9525392 proquest_miscellaneous_2721637012 proquest_journals_2719591344 crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s10270_022_01009_w crossref_primary_10_1007_s10270_022_01009_w springer_journals_10_1007_s10270_022_01009_w
PublicationCentury	2000
PublicationDate	2022-10-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD	2022-10-01
PublicationDate_xml	– month: 10 year: 2022 text: 2022-10-01 day: 01
PublicationDecade	2020
PublicationPlace	Berlin/Heidelberg
PublicationPlace_xml	– name: Berlin/Heidelberg – name: Heidelberg
PublicationTitle	Software and systems modeling
PublicationTitleAbbrev	Softw Syst Model
PublicationYear	2022
Publisher	Springer Berlin Heidelberg Springer Nature B.V
Publisher_xml	– name: Springer Berlin Heidelberg – name: Springer Nature B.V
References	Karsai, G., Krahn, H., Pinkernell, C., Rumpe, B., Schindler, M., Völkel, S.: Design guidelines for domain specific languages. In: Proceedings of the 9th OOPSLA Workshop on Domain-Specific Modeling (DSM’ 09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2009) Zimoch, M., Pryss, R., Probst, T., Schlee, W., Reichert, M.: The repercussions of business process modeling notations on mental load and mental effort. In: Proceedings of the BPM, pp. 133–145. Springer (2018) Fahland, D., Weidlich, M.: Scenario-based process modeling with greta. In: Rosa, M.L. (ed.) Proceedings of the Business Process Management 2010 Demonstration Track, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 615, pp. 52–57. CEUR-WS.org (2010). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-615/paper16.pdf Odeh, Y.: BPMN in engineering software requirements: an introductory brief guide. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information Management and Engineering, pp. 11–16. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, United States (2017) Ackermann, L., Volz, B.: Model [nl] generation: natural language model extraction. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Workshop on Domain-Specific Modeling, pp. 45–50 (2013) Izsó, B., Szárnyas, G., Ráth, I., Varró, D.: Mondo-sam: a framework to systematically assess mde scalability. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on on scalability in Model Driven Engineering (BigMDE@STAF), pp. 40–43 (2014) GoldschmidtTBeckerSUhlASchieferdeckerIHartmanAClassification of concrete textual syntax mapping approachesModel Driven Architecture: Foundations and Applications2008BerlinSpringer16918410.1007/978-3-540-69100-6_12 Ivanchikj, A., Pautasso, C.: Sketching process models by mining participant stories. In: Proceedings of the BPM Forum, pp. 3–19. Springer (2019) van der AalstWProcess Mining: Discovery, Conformance and Enhancement of Business Processes2011BerlinSpringer10.1007/978-3-642-19345-3 Abbad Andaloussi, A., Buch-Lorentsen, J., López, H.A., Slaats, T., Weber, B.: Exploring the modeling of declarative processes using a hybrid approach. In: Proceedings of Conceptual Modeling (ER 2019), pp. 162–170. Springer (2019) PachecoCRequirements elicitation techniques: a systematic literature review based on the maturity of the techniquesIET Softw.201812436537810.1049/iet-sen.2017.0144 Skouradaki, M., Roller, D., Pautasso, C., Leymann, F.: “bpelanon”: anonymizing bpel processes. In: Proceedings of the 6th Central European Workshop on Services and their Composition (ZEUS 2014). Potsdam, Germany (2014) Conn, A.P.: Time affordances: the time factor in diagnostic usability heuristics. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 186–193 (1995) HöverKMBorgertSMühlhäuserMFischerHSchneebergerJA domain specific language for describing s-bpm processesS-BPM ONE: Running Processes2013BerlinSpringer729010.1007/978-3-642-36754-0_5 NielsenJUsability Engineering1994Los AltosMorgan Kaufmann0816.68144 van Der AalstWMTer HofstedeAHKiepuszewskiBBarrosAPWorkflow patternsDistrib. Parallel Databases200314155110.1023/A:1022883727209 Leopold, H., Mendling, J., Polyvyanyy, A.: Generating natural language texts from business process models. In: International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pp. 64–79. Springer (2012) Dixit, P., Verbeek, H., Buijs, J., van der Aalst, W.: Interactive data-driven process model construction. In: International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, pp. 251–265. Springer (2018) Eysholdt, M., Behrens, H.: Xtext: implement your language faster than the quick and dirty way. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference Companion on Object Oriented Programming Systems Languages and Applications Companion, OOPSLA ’10, pp. 307–309. ACM (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1869542.1869625 Jannaber, S., Riehle, D.M., Delfmann, P., Thomas, O., Becker, J.: Designing a framework for the development of domain-specific process modelling languages. In: International Conference on Design Science Research in Information System and Technology, pp. 39–54. Springer (2017) MyersBATaxonomies of visual programming and program visualizationJ. Vis. Lang. Comput.19901197123247584910.1016/S1045-926X(05)80036-9 Friedrich, C., Schreiber, F.: Flexible layering in hierarchical drawings with nodes of arbitrary size. In: Proceedings of the 27th Australasian conference on Computer science-Volume 26, pp. 369–376. Australian Computer Society, Inc., P.O. Box 319 Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia (2004) Maro, S., Steghöfer, J.P., Anjorin, A., Tichy, M., Gelin, L.: On integrating graphical and textual editors for a UML profile based domain specific language: an industrial experience. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Language Engineering, pp. 1–12. ACM (2015) Fuhrmann, H., von Hanxleden, R.: Taming graphical modeling. In: International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, pp. 196–210. Springer (2010) DamijNBusiness process modelling using diagrammatic and tabular techniquesBus. Process Manag. J.2007131709010.1108/14637150710721131 Tanimoto, S.L.: A perspective on the evolution of live programming. In: 2013 1st International Workshop on Live Programming (LIVE), pp. 31–34 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/LIVE.2013.6617346 NielsenJLevyJMeasuring usability: preference vs. performanceCommun. ACM1994374667510.1145/175276.175282 Friedrich, F., Mendling, J., Puhlmann, F.: Process model generation from natural language text. In: Proceedings of the CAiSE, pp. 482–496. Springer (2011) LehmanJAAn empirical comparison of textual and graphical data structure documentation for Cobol programsIEEE Trans. Softw. Eng.19891591131113510.1109/32.31370 Wohed, P., Dumas, M., Ter Hofstede, A.H., Russell, N.: Pattern-based analysis of BPMN-an extensive evaluation of the control-flow, the data and the resource perspectives. BPM Center Report BPM-06-17 (2006). http://bpmcenter.org Van Der AalstWProcess miningCommun. ACM2012558768310.1145/2240236.2240257 Freund, N.: Development of a text-based representation of BPMN models. Master’s thesis, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover (2018) Ivanchikj, A., Serbout, S., Pautasso, C.: From text to visual bpmn process models: Design and evaluation. In: 23rd International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS). ACM/IEEE, Montreal, Canada (2020) OttensooserAFeketeAReijersHAMendlingJMenictasCMaking sense of business process descriptions: an experimental comparison of graphical and textual notationsJ. Syst. Softw.201285359660610.1016/j.jss.2011.09.023 Haisjackl, C., Zugal, S.: Investigating differences between graphical and textual declarative process models. In: Iliadis, L., Papazoglou, M., Pohl, K. (eds.) Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops, pp. 194–206. Springer (2014) Zur Muehlen, M., Recker, J.: How much language is enough? theoretical and practical use of the business process modeling notation. In: Proceedings of the CAiSE, pp. 465–479. Springer (2008) Grönninger, H., Krahn, H., Rumpe, B., Schindler, M., Völkel, S.: Textbased modeling. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Software Language Engineering (2007) WeskeMBusiness Process Management: Concepts, Languages, and Architectures20122BerlinSpringer10.1007/978-3-642-28616-2 HeXZhangTHuCJMaZShaoWAn mde performance testing framework based on random model generationJ. Syst. Softw.201612124726410.1016/j.jss.2016.04.044https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121216300292 Kous, K.: Comparative analysis versions of bpmn and its support with control-flow patterns. In: Proc. of 33rd International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), pp. 315–319. IEEE (2010) MacCaullWRabbiFLiuZWassyngANova workflow: a workflow management tool targeting health services deliveryFoundations of Health Informatics Engineering and Systems2012BerlinSpringer759210.1007/978-3-642-32355-3_5 JolakRSavary-LeblancMDaliborMWortmannAHebigRVincurJPolasekILe PallecXGérardSChaudronMRSoftware engineering whispers: the effect of textual vs. graphical software design descriptions on software design communicationEmpir. Softw. Eng.2020254427447110.1007/s10664-020-09835-6 De A. Rodrigues, R., De O. Barros, M., Revoredo, K., Azevedo, L.G., Leopold, H.: An experiment on process model understandability using textual work instructions and bpmn models. In: Proceedings of the 29th Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering, pp. 41–50 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/SBES.2015.12 Sharafi, Z., Marchetto, A., Susi, A., Antoniol, G., Guéhéneuc, Y.G.: An empirical study on the efficiency of graphical vs. textual representations in requirements comprehension. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC 2013), pp. 33–42. IEEE (2013) Heijstek, W., Kühne, T., Chaudron, M.R.: Experimental analysis of textual and graphical representations for software architecture design. In: 2011 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pp. 167–176. IEEE (2011) Epure, E.V., et al.: Automatic process model discovery from textual methodologies. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), pp. 19–30. IEEE (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/RCIS.2015.7128860 Ferreira, R.C.B., Thom, L.H., Fantinato, M.: A semi-automatic approach to identify business process elements in natural language texts. In: ICEIS (3), pp. 250–261 (2017) Henzinger, M.: The state of the art in dynamic graph algorithms. In: SOFSEM 2018: Theory and Practice of Computer Science, pp. 40–44. Springer (2018) PetreMWhy looking isn’t always seeing: readership skills and graphical programmingCommun. ACM1995386334410.1145/203241.203251http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=203241.203251 Brambilla, M., Cabot, J., Comai, S.: Automatic generation of workflow-extended domain models. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, MODELS’07, pp. 375–389. Springer, B R Jolak (1009_CR34) 2020; 25 M Weske (1009_CR66) 2012 C Pacheco (1009_CR53) 2018; 12 WM van Der Aalst (1009_CR63) 2003; 14 1009_CR37 1009_CR36 1009_CR35 1009_CR39 1009_CR30 J Nielsen (1009_CR49) 1994 N Damij (1009_CR5) 2007; 13 1009_CR33 M Petre (1009_CR54) 1995; 38 1009_CR32 1009_CR31 A Fleischmann (1009_CR14) 2010 W MacCaull (1009_CR43) 2012 W van der Aalst (1009_CR62) 2011 1009_CR6 1009_CR7 1009_CR8 A Luebbe (1009_CR42) 2012 1009_CR9 JA Lehman (1009_CR38) 1989; 15 1009_CR2 1009_CR3 N Russell (1009_CR56) 2016 1009_CR4 1009_CR47 BA Myers (1009_CR48) 1990; 1 1009_CR1 1009_CR41 1009_CR40 1009_CR44 ER Gansner (1009_CR20) 2000; 30 A Ottensooser (1009_CR52) 2012; 85 S McLellan (1009_CR45) 2012; 7 1009_CR16 1009_CR59 1009_CR58 1009_CR13 1009_CR57 1009_CR19 1009_CR18 W Van Der Aalst (1009_CR65) 2012; 55 1009_CR17 1009_CR51 1009_CR12 1009_CR11 J Nielsen (1009_CR50) 1994; 37 1009_CR55 1009_CR10 X He (1009_CR25) 2016; 121 1009_CR27 1009_CR26 T Goldschmidt (1009_CR22) 2008 1009_CR69 1009_CR24 1009_CR68 1009_CR28 1009_CR61 KM Höver (1009_CR29) 2013 1009_CR60 Y Fontenla-Seco (1009_CR15) 2021 1009_CR23 1009_CR67 1009_CR21 S Meliá (1009_CR46) 2016; 24 1009_CR64
References_xml	– reference: PetreMWhy looking isn’t always seeing: readership skills and graphical programmingCommun. ACM1995386334410.1145/203241.203251http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=203241.203251 – reference: Ghose, A., Koliadis, G., Chueng, A.: Process discovery from model and text artefacts. In: 2007 IEEE Congress on Services, pp. 167–174. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/SERVICES.2007.52 – reference: MeliáSCacheroCHermidaJMAparicioEComparison of a textual versus a graphical notation for the maintainability of MDE domain models: an empirical pilot studySoftw. Qual. J.201624370973510.1007/s11219-015-9299-x – reference: Van der Aa, H., Carmona Vargas, J., Leopold, H., Mendling, J., Padró, L.: Challenges and opportunities of applying natural language processing in business process management. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2018), pp. 2791–2801. Association for Computational Linguistics (2018) – reference: Haisjackl, C., Zugal, S.: Investigating differences between graphical and textual declarative process models. In: Iliadis, L., Papazoglou, M., Pohl, K. (eds.) Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops, pp. 194–206. Springer (2014) – reference: Van Amstel, M., Bosems, S., Kurtev, I., Pires, L.F.: Performance in model transformations: experiments with ATL and QVT. In: International Conference on Theory and Practice of Model Transformations, pp. 198–212. Springer (2011) – reference: Conn, A.P.: Time affordances: the time factor in diagnostic usability heuristics. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 186–193 (1995) – reference: López, H.A., Marquard, M., Muttenthaler, L., Strømsted, R.: Assisted declarative process creation from natural language descriptions. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOCW 2019), pp. 96–99. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA (2019) – reference: Tanimoto, S.L.: A perspective on the evolution of live programming. In: 2013 1st International Workshop on Live Programming (LIVE), pp. 31–34 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/LIVE.2013.6617346 – reference: Fahland, D., Weidlich, M.: Scenario-based process modeling with greta. In: Rosa, M.L. (ed.) Proceedings of the Business Process Management 2010 Demonstration Track, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 615, pp. 52–57. CEUR-WS.org (2010). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-615/paper16.pdf – reference: OttensooserAFeketeAReijersHAMendlingJMenictasCMaking sense of business process descriptions: an experimental comparison of graphical and textual notationsJ. Syst. Softw.201285359660610.1016/j.jss.2011.09.023 – reference: Friedrich, F., Mendling, J., Puhlmann, F.: Process model generation from natural language text. In: Proceedings of the CAiSE, pp. 482–496. Springer (2011) – reference: Fontenla-SecoYLamaMBugarínAHeintzFMilanoMO’SullivanBProcess-to-text: a framework for the quantitative description of processes in natural languageTrustworthy AI: Integrating Learning, Optimization and Reasoning2021BerlinSpringer21221910.1007/978-3-030-73959-1_19 – reference: Grönninger, H., Krahn, H., Rumpe, B., Schindler, M., Völkel, S.: Textbased modeling. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Software Language Engineering (2007) – reference: van der AalstWProcess Mining: Discovery, Conformance and Enhancement of Business Processes2011BerlinSpringer10.1007/978-3-642-19345-3 – reference: Meyer, A., Pufahl, L., Fahland, D., Weske, M.: Modeling and enacting complex data dependencies in business processes. In: Proceedings of the Business Process Management, pp. 171–186. Springer (2013) – reference: Leopold, H., Mendling, J., Polyvyanyy, A.: Generating natural language texts from business process models. In: International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pp. 64–79. Springer (2012) – reference: van Der AalstWMTer HofstedeAHKiepuszewskiBBarrosAPWorkflow patternsDistrib. Parallel Databases200314155110.1023/A:1022883727209 – reference: NielsenJLevyJMeasuring usability: preference vs. performanceCommun. ACM1994374667510.1145/175276.175282 – reference: Liu, W., Wang, Y., Zhou, Q., Li, T.: Graphical modeling vs. textual modeling: an experimental comparison based on istar models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 45th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC 2021), pp. 844–853. IEEE (2021) – reference: Brambilla, M., Cabot, J., Comai, S.: Automatic generation of workflow-extended domain models. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, MODELS’07, pp. 375–389. Springer, Berlin (2007) – reference: Ackermann, L., Volz, B.: Model [nl] generation: natural language model extraction. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Workshop on Domain-Specific Modeling, pp. 45–50 (2013) – reference: Izsó, B., Szárnyas, G., Ráth, I., Varró, D.: Mondo-sam: a framework to systematically assess mde scalability. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on on scalability in Model Driven Engineering (BigMDE@STAF), pp. 40–43 (2014) – reference: Jordan, D., Evdemon, J.: Business process model and notation version 2.0. OMG (2011). http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/ – reference: WeskeMBusiness Process Management: Concepts, Languages, and Architectures20122BerlinSpringer10.1007/978-3-642-28616-2 – reference: Maro, S., Steghöfer, J.P., Anjorin, A., Tichy, M., Gelin, L.: On integrating graphical and textual editors for a UML profile based domain specific language: an industrial experience. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Language Engineering, pp. 1–12. ACM (2015) – reference: FleischmannABuchwaldHFleischmannASeeseDStaryCWhat is s-bpm?S-BPM ONE: Setting the Stage for Subject-Oriented Business Process Management2010BerlinSpringer8510610.1007/978-3-642-15915-2_7 – reference: Ivanchikj, A., Pautasso, C.: Sketching process models by mining participant stories. In: Proceedings of the BPM Forum, pp. 3–19. Springer (2019) – reference: MacCaullWRabbiFLiuZWassyngANova workflow: a workflow management tool targeting health services deliveryFoundations of Health Informatics Engineering and Systems2012BerlinSpringer759210.1007/978-3-642-32355-3_5 – reference: MyersBATaxonomies of visual programming and program visualizationJ. Vis. Lang. Comput.19901197123247584910.1016/S1045-926X(05)80036-9 – reference: NielsenJUsability Engineering1994Los AltosMorgan Kaufmann0816.68144 – reference: LehmanJAAn empirical comparison of textual and graphical data structure documentation for Cobol programsIEEE Trans. Softw. Eng.19891591131113510.1109/32.31370 – reference: Eysholdt, M., Behrens, H.: Xtext: implement your language faster than the quick and dirty way. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference Companion on Object Oriented Programming Systems Languages and Applications Companion, OOPSLA ’10, pp. 307–309. ACM (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1869542.1869625 – reference: Van Der AalstWProcess miningCommun. ACM2012558768310.1145/2240236.2240257 – reference: Friedrich, C., Schreiber, F.: Flexible layering in hierarchical drawings with nodes of arbitrary size. In: Proceedings of the 27th Australasian conference on Computer science-Volume 26, pp. 369–376. Australian Computer Society, Inc., P.O. Box 319 Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia (2004) – reference: Henzinger, M.: The state of the art in dynamic graph algorithms. In: SOFSEM 2018: Theory and Practice of Computer Science, pp. 40–44. Springer (2018) – reference: Kous, K.: Comparative analysis versions of bpmn and its support with control-flow patterns. In: Proc. of 33rd International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), pp. 315–319. IEEE (2010) – reference: Dixit, P., Verbeek, H., Buijs, J., van der Aalst, W.: Interactive data-driven process model construction. In: International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, pp. 251–265. Springer (2018) – reference: Honkisz, K., Kluza, K., Wiśniewski, P.: A concept for generating business process models from natural language description. In: International Conference on Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management, pp. 91–103. Springer (2018) – reference: Karsai, G., Krahn, H., Pinkernell, C., Rumpe, B., Schindler, M., Völkel, S.: Design guidelines for domain specific languages. In: Proceedings of the 9th OOPSLA Workshop on Domain-Specific Modeling (DSM’ 09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2009) – reference: Sharafi, Z., Marchetto, A., Susi, A., Antoniol, G., Guéhéneuc, Y.G.: An empirical study on the efficiency of graphical vs. textual representations in requirements comprehension. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC 2013), pp. 33–42. IEEE (2013) – reference: GoldschmidtTBeckerSUhlASchieferdeckerIHartmanAClassification of concrete textual syntax mapping approachesModel Driven Architecture: Foundations and Applications2008BerlinSpringer16918410.1007/978-3-540-69100-6_12 – reference: Fuhrmann, H., von Hanxleden, R.: Taming graphical modeling. In: International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, pp. 196–210. Springer (2010) – reference: GansnerERNorthSCAn open graph visualization system and its applications to software engineeringSoftw. Pract. Exp.200030111203123310.1002/1097-024X(200009)30:11<1203::AID-SPE338>3.0.CO;2-N – reference: LuebbeAWeskeMPlattnerHMeinelCLeiferLDetermining the effect of tangible business process modelingDesign Thinking Research2012BerlinSpringer24125710.1007/978-3-642-21643-5_14 – reference: Abbad Andaloussi, A., Buch-Lorentsen, J., López, H.A., Slaats, T., Weber, B.: Exploring the modeling of declarative processes using a hybrid approach. In: Proceedings of Conceptual Modeling (ER 2019), pp. 162–170. Springer (2019) – reference: Ivanchikj, A., Serbout, S., Pautasso, C.: From text to visual bpmn process models: Design and evaluation. In: 23rd International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS). ACM/IEEE, Montreal, Canada (2020) – reference: McLellanSMuddimerAPeresSCThe effect of experience on system usability scale ratingsJ. Usability Stud.2012725667 – reference: Rabbi, F., MacCaull, W.: T-square: a domain specific language for rapid workflow development. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, MODELS’12, pp. 36–52. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33666-9_4 – reference: Ferreira, R.C.B., Thom, L.H., Fantinato, M.: A semi-automatic approach to identify business process elements in natural language texts. In: ICEIS (3), pp. 250–261 (2017) – reference: Ferme, V., Lenhard, J., Harrer, S., Geiger, M., Pautasso, C.: Workflow management systems benchmarking: unfulfilled expectations and lessons learned. In: Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2017, Buenos Aires, Argentina, May 20–28, 2017—Companion Volume, pp. 379–381. IEEE Computer Society (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-C.2017.126 – reference: van der Aa, H., Di Ciccio, C., Leopold, H., Reijers, H.A.: Extracting declarative process models from natural language. In: International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pp. 365–382. Springer (2019) – reference: Zur Muehlen, M., Recker, J.: How much language is enough? theoretical and practical use of the business process modeling notation. In: Proceedings of the CAiSE, pp. 465–479. Springer (2008) – reference: Heijstek, W., Kühne, T., Chaudron, M.R.: Experimental analysis of textual and graphical representations for software architecture design. In: 2011 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pp. 167–176. IEEE (2011) – reference: PachecoCRequirements elicitation techniques: a systematic literature review based on the maturity of the techniquesIET Softw.201812436537810.1049/iet-sen.2017.0144 – reference: Wohed, P., Dumas, M., Ter Hofstede, A.H., Russell, N.: Pattern-based analysis of BPMN-an extensive evaluation of the control-flow, the data and the resource perspectives. BPM Center Report BPM-06-17 (2006). http://bpmcenter.org – reference: Jannaber, S., Riehle, D.M., Delfmann, P., Thomas, O., Becker, J.: Designing a framework for the development of domain-specific process modelling languages. In: International Conference on Design Science Research in Information System and Technology, pp. 39–54. Springer (2017) – reference: Freund, N.: Development of a text-based representation of BPMN models. Master’s thesis, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover (2018) – reference: Skouradaki, M., Roller, D., Pautasso, C., Leymann, F.: “bpelanon”: anonymizing bpel processes. In: Proceedings of the 6th Central European Workshop on Services and their Composition (ZEUS 2014). Potsdam, Germany (2014) – reference: HeXZhangTHuCJMaZShaoWAn mde performance testing framework based on random model generationJ. Syst. Softw.201612124726410.1016/j.jss.2016.04.044https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121216300292 – reference: HöverKMBorgertSMühlhäuserMFischerHSchneebergerJA domain specific language for describing s-bpm processesS-BPM ONE: Running Processes2013BerlinSpringer729010.1007/978-3-642-36754-0_5 – reference: JolakRSavary-LeblancMDaliborMWortmannAHebigRVincurJPolasekILe PallecXGérardSChaudronMRSoftware engineering whispers: the effect of textual vs. graphical software design descriptions on software design communicationEmpir. Softw. Eng.2020254427447110.1007/s10664-020-09835-6 – reference: RussellNVan Der AalstWMTer HofstedeAHWorkflow Patterns: The Definitive Guide2016CambridgeMIT Press10.7551/mitpress/8085.001.0001 – reference: DamijNBusiness process modelling using diagrammatic and tabular techniquesBus. Process Manag. J.2007131709010.1108/14637150710721131 – reference: Epure, E.V., et al.: Automatic process model discovery from textual methodologies. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), pp. 19–30. IEEE (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/RCIS.2015.7128860 – reference: Odeh, Y.: BPMN in engineering software requirements: an introductory brief guide. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information Management and Engineering, pp. 11–16. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, United States (2017) – reference: De A. Rodrigues, R., De O. Barros, M., Revoredo, K., Azevedo, L.G., Leopold, H.: An experiment on process model understandability using textual work instructions and bpmn models. In: Proceedings of the 29th Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering, pp. 41–50 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/SBES.2015.12 – reference: Döweling, S., Tahiri, T., Schmidt, B., Nolte, A., Khalilbeigi, M.: Collaborative business process modeling on interactive tabletops. In: ECIS (2013) – reference: Zimoch, M., Pryss, R., Probst, T., Schlee, W., Reichert, M.: The repercussions of business process modeling notations on mental load and mental effort. In: Proceedings of the BPM, pp. 133–145. Springer (2018) – volume-title: Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, and Architectures year: 2012 ident: 1009_CR66 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-28616-2 – start-page: 75 volume-title: Foundations of Health Informatics Engineering and Systems year: 2012 ident: 1009_CR43 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-32355-3_5 – ident: 1009_CR59 doi: 10.1109/LIVE.2013.6617346 – volume: 55 start-page: 76 issue: 8 year: 2012 ident: 1009_CR65 publication-title: Commun. ACM doi: 10.1145/2240236.2240257 – volume: 12 start-page: 365 issue: 4 year: 2018 ident: 1009_CR53 publication-title: IET Softw. doi: 10.1049/iet-sen.2017.0144 – volume: 37 start-page: 66 issue: 4 year: 1994 ident: 1009_CR50 publication-title: Commun. ACM doi: 10.1145/175276.175282 – volume: 13 start-page: 70 issue: 1 year: 2007 ident: 1009_CR5 publication-title: Bus. Process Manag. J. doi: 10.1108/14637150710721131 – ident: 1009_CR31 doi: 10.1145/3365438.3410990 – volume: 30 start-page: 1203 issue: 11 year: 2000 ident: 1009_CR20 publication-title: Softw. Pract. Exp. doi: 10.1002/1097-024X(200009)30:11<1203::AID-SPE338>3.0.CO;2-N – ident: 1009_CR2 doi: 10.1145/2541928.2541937 – ident: 1009_CR7 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_19 – ident: 1009_CR30 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-26643-1_1 – ident: 1009_CR18 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-21640-4_36 – ident: 1009_CR67 – start-page: 169 volume-title: Model Driven Architecture: Foundations and Applications year: 2008 ident: 1009_CR22 doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-69100-6_12 – ident: 1009_CR10 doi: 10.1145/1869542.1869625 – ident: 1009_CR57 doi: 10.1109/ICPC.2013.6613831 – ident: 1009_CR68 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-11641-5_11 – ident: 1009_CR11 – start-page: 85 volume-title: S-BPM ONE: Setting the Stage for Subject-Oriented Business Process Management year: 2010 ident: 1009_CR14 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-15915-2_7 – volume: 7 start-page: 56 issue: 2 year: 2012 ident: 1009_CR45 publication-title: J. Usability Stud. – ident: 1009_CR58 – ident: 1009_CR60 – ident: 1009_CR1 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-33223-5_14 – ident: 1009_CR51 doi: 10.1145/3149572.3149584 – ident: 1009_CR69 doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-69534-9_35 – ident: 1009_CR37 – ident: 1009_CR44 doi: 10.1145/2814251.2814253 – volume: 85 start-page: 596 issue: 3 year: 2012 ident: 1009_CR52 publication-title: J. Syst. Softw. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.09.023 – ident: 1009_CR23 – ident: 1009_CR47 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-40176-3_14 – volume: 38 start-page: 33 issue: 6 year: 1995 ident: 1009_CR54 publication-title: Commun. ACM doi: 10.1145/203241.203251 – ident: 1009_CR8 – ident: 1009_CR6 doi: 10.1109/SBES.2015.12 – ident: 1009_CR16 – ident: 1009_CR55 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-33666-9_4 – ident: 1009_CR27 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-73117-9_3 – ident: 1009_CR36 – ident: 1009_CR12 doi: 10.1109/ICSE-C.2017.126 – ident: 1009_CR64 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-21732-6_14 – ident: 1009_CR39 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-31095-9_5 – start-page: 212 volume-title: Trustworthy AI: Integrating Learning, Optimization and Reasoning year: 2021 ident: 1009_CR15 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-73959-1_19 – ident: 1009_CR21 doi: 10.1109/SERVICES.2007.52 – ident: 1009_CR41 doi: 10.1109/EDOCW.2019.00027 – ident: 1009_CR40 doi: 10.1109/COMPSAC51774.2021.00117 – volume-title: Usability Engineering year: 1994 ident: 1009_CR49 – ident: 1009_CR33 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-59144-5_3 – ident: 1009_CR3 doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-75209-7_26 – ident: 1009_CR61 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-21290-2_23 – volume: 1 start-page: 97 issue: 1 year: 1990 ident: 1009_CR48 publication-title: J. Vis. Lang. Comput. doi: 10.1016/S1045-926X(05)80036-9 – ident: 1009_CR17 – ident: 1009_CR32 – ident: 1009_CR26 doi: 10.1109/ESEM.2011.25 – ident: 1009_CR28 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-99365-2_8 – volume: 25 start-page: 4427 year: 2020 ident: 1009_CR34 publication-title: Empir. Softw. Eng. doi: 10.1007/s10664-020-09835-6 – ident: 1009_CR35 – ident: 1009_CR4 doi: 10.1145/223904.223928 – start-page: 241 volume-title: Design Thinking Research year: 2012 ident: 1009_CR42 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-21643-5_14 – volume-title: Workflow Patterns: The Definitive Guide year: 2016 ident: 1009_CR56 doi: 10.7551/mitpress/8085.001.0001 – ident: 1009_CR13 doi: 10.5220/0006305902500261 – ident: 1009_CR19 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-16145-2_14 – start-page: 72 volume-title: S-BPM ONE: Running Processes year: 2013 ident: 1009_CR29 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-36754-0_5 – volume: 15 start-page: 1131 issue: 9 year: 1989 ident: 1009_CR38 publication-title: IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. doi: 10.1109/32.31370 – volume-title: Process Mining: Discovery, Conformance and Enhancement of Business Processes year: 2011 ident: 1009_CR62 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-19345-3 – volume: 24 start-page: 709 issue: 3 year: 2016 ident: 1009_CR46 publication-title: Softw. Qual. J. doi: 10.1007/s11219-015-9299-x – ident: 1009_CR9 doi: 10.1109/RCIS.2015.7128860 – volume: 121 start-page: 247 year: 2016 ident: 1009_CR25 publication-title: J. Syst. Softw. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.044 – volume: 14 start-page: 5 issue: 1 year: 2003 ident: 1009_CR63 publication-title: Distrib. Parallel Databases doi: 10.1023/A:1022883727209 – ident: 1009_CR24 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-07869-4_17
SSID	ssib004299466 ssj0027432
Score	2.307664
Snippet	BPMN Sketch Miner is a modeling environment for generating visual business process models starting from constrained natural language textual input. Its purpose...
SourceID	pubmedcentral proquest crossref springer
SourceType	Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher
StartPage	1877
SubjectTerms	Benchmarks Compilers Computer Science Environment models Exports Flow distribution Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet) Interpreters IT in Business Keywords Language Natural language Performance evaluation Programming Languages Programming Techniques Software Software Engineering Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems Special Section Paper Synchronism Usability User experience Workloads
SummonAdditionalLinks	– databaseName: Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database dbid: P5Z link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3NT-QgFH_x6-DFr9XYXTWY7M0llhZoORk1Gg86mWQ9mL00FGg0ms7ojOu_vzyGzuyY6MVrgUB5D_jB-_gB_HRKq1xZTblRkvLccqosK6lXhbr21wnmdGAtuS56vfLuTvXjg9soulV2e2LYqO3A4Bv5cVZgGhSWc34yfKbIGoXW1UihsQjLmCUBqRv64s9_F65AUOZBjaIslzIGzcTQuQwpVzJ0TEADwdv8wTRDm-99Jd8ZTMM5dLn-1T_YgLWIQMnpRGU2YcG1W7DesTuQuNi_QXrtN0IynAQSkMCY4wdE8OGWeNRIzvo3PfL7EcVObjCEcBtuLy9uz69o5Feghgs2pjq1hchM4VKec48sikY2UhluFcIQ6wFtmvtP1ljJHK-N1I6ZRlihdGldmu_AUjto3S6QRgtbN03h65Q847IWyrHUWVWmWtpaJsC6ua1MzD2OFBhP1SxrMsqj8vKogjyqtwSOpm2Gk8wbn9be6ya9iqtwVM1mPIHDabFfP2gU0a0bvGKdzEPSwp_TCRRzop72ihm450vah_uQiVuJTHiAmcCvTilmnX881u-fj_UHrGaol8FjcA-Wxi-vbh9WzN_xw-jlIGj4Py8JAcU priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest
Title	Live process modeling with the BPMN Sketch Miner
URI	https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10270-022-01009-w https://www.proquest.com/docview/2719591344 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2721637012 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9525392
Volume	21
WOSCitedRecordID	wos000817829400001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText	1
inHoldings	1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights	– providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: Springer Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1619-1374 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0027432 issn: 1619-1366 databaseCode: RSV dateStart: 20020901 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22 providerName: Springer Nature
link	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LT9wwEB6Vx4ELtBTUULpypd6KpTjxIz6WCoQErFaA0KqXyLEdsaIKiF3g7zP2JrtdRJHgEinJJE5mPJ7P9jwAfnhtdK6dodxqSXnuONWOFRS7QlXhdIJ5E6uWnKh-vxgO9aANCht33u7dlmQcqf8JdstCkZQsuBKEJf3HJVhBc1eEgg1n55cLIywPIGU27YplyhDaaMpyKdvQmZffuWie5pjzucfks23TaI0ON973Hx9hvUWf5Ne0u3yCD77ZhI2usgNpFf0zpCc4CJLbaRABidVysAkSFm0JIkayPzjtk_PrIHJyGsIHt-Di8ODi9xFtaytQywWbUJM6JTKrfMpzjqhC1bKW2nKnAwRxCGbTHC856yTzvLLSeGZr4YQ2hfNpvg3LzU3jvwCpjXBVXSukKXjGZSW0Z6l3KBgjXSUTYB1HS9vmHQ_lL_6W84zJgSMlcqSMHCkfE_g5e-Z2mnXjVerdTlBlq4HjMlMhbQ7LOU_g--w26k7YEDGNv7kPNBnCUYU2OgG1IOBZqyH79uKdZnQVs3BrkQkElwnsdWKeN_7_b915G_lXWMtCT4neg7uwPLm7999g1T5MRuO7HiypYdGDlf2D_uAMz44VxeNA_OlFjXgCavEAKQ
linkProvider	Springer Nature
linkToHtml	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Jb9QwFH4qBYleKKsaaMFIcAKrsePY8aGqylK1mkWVmENvkWM7ogJlhs6UET-K_4ifJ5lhKtFbD1xjJ3HyVvstH8Abr43OtDNUWC2pyJyg2rGCBlaoqrCdYN5E1JK-Gg6L83N9tgG_u1oYTKvsdGJU1G5s8Yx8nytsg8IyIQ4nPyiiRmF0tYPQWLBFz_-ahy3b9OD0U6DvW86PP48-ntAWVYBakbMZNalTObfKpyITwZ6qWtZSW-E0Gl8X3Lg0C5ecdZJ5UVlpPLN17nJtCufTLDz2DtwVWaFQrHqK_rW_i3howYfSlGVStjU6baUeR4QXjnkQGI-Yr9vBlXN7PTXzWnw2mr3j7f_shz2EB61_TY4WAvEINnzzGLY77ArSqrInkPaDmieTRZkEiXhA4fsJHkuT4BOTD2eDIfnyDZmaDLBA8imMbmPZz2CzGTd-B0htclfVtQpzCsGFrHLtWeqdLlIjXSUTYB0pS9t2VkeAj-_lqic0kr8M5C8j-ct5Au-W90wWfUVunL3b0bhsdcy0XBE4gdfL4aAdMORjGj--wjk8ONwqeCEJqDXOWr4V-4uvjzQXX2OfcZ3zPLjPCbzveHD18n-v9fnNa30F909Gg37ZPx32XsAWR5GIuZG7sDm7vPJ7cM_-nF1ML19G4SJQ3jJv_gEFhl6q
linkToPdf	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Lb9QwEB6VghCXlldFSgEjwQmsJo7txAdUFcqKqtvVSvRQcbES21GrouzS3bLip_HvmMkmu2wleuuBa-wklv15HvbMfABvgilManzBpTOay9RLbnySc4RCWaI7kYSiYS3pZ4NBfnpqhmvwu8uFobDKTiY2gtqPHJ2R74qMyqAkqZS7VRsWMTzo7Y1_cGKQopvWjk5jDpGj8GuG7tvkw-EBrvVbIXqfTz594S3DAHdSJVNexD5TwmUhlqlE3ZpVutLGSW9IEXs06eIUH3nndRJk6XQRElcpr0yR-xCn-Nk7cDdDF5OiCYfq21--XsONhvaU4UmqdZuv02btCWJ7ERQTQXcTs1WduDR0r4dpXrurbVRgb_M_nryHsNHa3Wx_vlEewVqoH8Nmx2nBWhH3BOI-in82nqdPsIYnCOeC0XE1Q1uZfRweD9jXCwI7O6bEyadwchvD3oL1elSHZ8CqQvmyqjLsk0shdalMSOLgTR4X2pc6gqRbVuvaiutE_PHdLmtFExQsQsE2ULCzCN4t3hnP643c2HunW2_byp6JXS52BK8XzSg16CqoqMPoivoINMQztE4iyFZQtvgr1R1fbanPz5r640YJhWZ1BO87PC5__u-xbt881ldwHyFp-4eDo-fwQNDuaEImd2B9enkVXsA993N6Prl82ewzBvaWofkHOO9nzg
openUrl	ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Live+process+modeling+with+the+BPMN+Sketch+Miner&rft.jtitle=Software+and+systems+modeling&rft.au=Ivanchikj%2C+Ana&rft.au=Serbout%2C+Souhaila&rft.au=Pautasso%2C+Cesare&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.pub=Springer+Berlin+Heidelberg&rft.issn=1619-1366&rft.eissn=1619-1374&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1877&rft.epage=1906&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs10270-022-01009-w&rft.externalDocID=10_1007_s10270_022_01009_w
thumbnail_l	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1619-1366&client=summon
thumbnail_m	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1619-1366&client=summon
thumbnail_s	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1619-1366&client=summon