Floral traits influencing plant attractiveness to three bee species Consequences for plant reproductive success
PREMISE OF THE STUDY: The ability to attract pollinators is crucial to plants that rely on insects for pollination. We contrasted the roles of floral display size and flower color in attracting three bee species and determined the relationships between plant attractiveness (number of pollinator visi...
Saved in:
| Published in: | American journal of botany Vol. 104; no. 5; pp. 772 - 781 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
United States
Botanical Society of America, Inc
01.05.2017
Botanical Society of America |
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 0002-9122, 1537-2197, 1537-2197 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | PREMISE OF THE STUDY:
The ability to attract pollinators is crucial to plants that rely on insects for pollination. We contrasted the roles of floral display size and flower color in attracting three bee species and determined the relationships between plant attractiveness (number of pollinator visits) and seed set for each bee species.
METHODS:
We recorded pollinator visits to plants, measured plant traits, and quantified plant reproductive success. A zero‐inflated Poisson regression model indicated plant traits associated with pollinator attraction. It identified traits that increased the number of bee visits and traits that increased the probability of a plant not receiving any visits. Different components of floral display size were examined and two models of flower color contrasted. Relationships between plant attractiveness and seed set were determined using regression analyses.
KEY RESULTS:
Plants with more racemes received more bee visits from all three bee species. Plants with few racemes were more likely not to receive any bee visits. The role of flower color varied with bee species and was influenced by the choice of the flower color model. Increasing bee visits increased seed set for all three bee species, with the steepest slope for leafcutting bees, followed by bumble bees, and finally honey bees.
CONCLUSIONS:
Floral display size influenced pollinator attraction more consistently than flower color. The same plant traits affected the probability of not being visited and the number of pollinator visits received. The impact of plant attractiveness on female reproductive success varied, together with pollinator effectiveness, by pollinator species. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | The ability to attract pollinators is crucial to plants that rely on insects for pollination. We contrasted the roles of floral display size and flower color in attracting three bee species and determined the relationships between plant attractiveness (number of pollinator visits) and seed set for each bee species.
We recorded pollinator visits to plants, measured plant traits, and quantified plant reproductive success. A zero-inflated Poisson regression model indicated plant traits associated with pollinator attraction. It identified traits that increased the number of bee visits and traits that increased the probability of a plant not receiving any visits. Different components of floral display size were examined and two models of flower color contrasted. Relationships between plant attractiveness and seed set were determined using regression analyses.
Plants with more racemes received more bee visits from all three bee species. Plants with few racemes were more likely not to receive any bee visits. The role of flower color varied with bee species and was influenced by the choice of the flower color model. Increasing bee visits increased seed set for all three bee species, with the steepest slope for leafcutting bees, followed by bumble bees, and finally honey bees.
Floral display size influenced pollinator attraction more consistently than flower color. The same plant traits affected the probability of not being visited and the number of pollinator visits received. The impact of plant attractiveness on female reproductive success varied, together with pollinator effectiveness, by pollinator species. PREMISE OF THE STUDY: The ability to attract pollinators is crucial to plants that rely on insects for pollination. We contrasted the roles of floral display size and flower color in attracting three bee species and determined the relationships between plant attractiveness (number of pollinator visits) and seed set for each bee species. METHODS: We recorded pollinator visits to plants, measured plant traits, and quantified plant reproductive success. A zero‐inflated Poisson regression model indicated plant traits associated with pollinator attraction. It identified traits that increased the number of bee visits and traits that increased the probability of a plant not receiving any visits. Different components of floral display size were examined and two models of flower color contrasted. Relationships between plant attractiveness and seed set were determined using regression analyses. KEY RESULTS: Plants with more racemes received more bee visits from all three bee species. Plants with few racemes were more likely not to receive any bee visits. The role of flower color varied with bee species and was influenced by the choice of the flower color model. Increasing bee visits increased seed set for all three bee species, with the steepest slope for leafcutting bees, followed by bumble bees, and finally honey bees. CONCLUSIONS: Floral display size influenced pollinator attraction more consistently than flower color. The same plant traits affected the probability of not being visited and the number of pollinator visits received. The impact of plant attractiveness on female reproductive success varied, together with pollinator effectiveness, by pollinator species. The ability to attract pollinators is crucial to plants that rely on insects for pollination. We contrasted the roles of floral display size and flower color in attracting three bee species and determined the relationships between plant attractiveness (number of pollinator visits) and seed set for each bee species.PREMISE OF THE STUDYThe ability to attract pollinators is crucial to plants that rely on insects for pollination. We contrasted the roles of floral display size and flower color in attracting three bee species and determined the relationships between plant attractiveness (number of pollinator visits) and seed set for each bee species.We recorded pollinator visits to plants, measured plant traits, and quantified plant reproductive success. A zero-inflated Poisson regression model indicated plant traits associated with pollinator attraction. It identified traits that increased the number of bee visits and traits that increased the probability of a plant not receiving any visits. Different components of floral display size were examined and two models of flower color contrasted. Relationships between plant attractiveness and seed set were determined using regression analyses.METHODSWe recorded pollinator visits to plants, measured plant traits, and quantified plant reproductive success. A zero-inflated Poisson regression model indicated plant traits associated with pollinator attraction. It identified traits that increased the number of bee visits and traits that increased the probability of a plant not receiving any visits. Different components of floral display size were examined and two models of flower color contrasted. Relationships between plant attractiveness and seed set were determined using regression analyses.Plants with more racemes received more bee visits from all three bee species. Plants with few racemes were more likely not to receive any bee visits. The role of flower color varied with bee species and was influenced by the choice of the flower color model. Increasing bee visits increased seed set for all three bee species, with the steepest slope for leafcutting bees, followed by bumble bees, and finally honey bees.KEY RESULTSPlants with more racemes received more bee visits from all three bee species. Plants with few racemes were more likely not to receive any bee visits. The role of flower color varied with bee species and was influenced by the choice of the flower color model. Increasing bee visits increased seed set for all three bee species, with the steepest slope for leafcutting bees, followed by bumble bees, and finally honey bees.Floral display size influenced pollinator attraction more consistently than flower color. The same plant traits affected the probability of not being visited and the number of pollinator visits received. The impact of plant attractiveness on female reproductive success varied, together with pollinator effectiveness, by pollinator species.CONCLUSIONSFloral display size influenced pollinator attraction more consistently than flower color. The same plant traits affected the probability of not being visited and the number of pollinator visits received. The impact of plant attractiveness on female reproductive success varied, together with pollinator effectiveness, by pollinator species. PREMISE OF THE STUDY: The ability to attract pollinators is crucial to plants that rely on insects for pollination. We contrasted the roles of floral display size and flower color in attracting three bee species and determined the relationships between plant attractiveness (number of pollinator visits) and seed set for each bee species. METHODS: We recorded pollinator visits to plants, measured plant traits, and quantified plant reproductive success. A zero‐inflated Poisson regression model indicated plant traits associated with pollinator attraction. It identified traits that increased the number of bee visits and traits that increased the probability of a plant not receiving any visits. Different components of floral display size were examined and two models of flower color contrasted. Relationships between plant attractiveness and seed set were determined using regression analyses. KEY RESULTS: Plants with more racemes received more bee visits from all three bee species. Plants with few racemes were more likely not to receive any bee visits. The role of flower color varied with bee species and was influenced by the choice of the flower color model. Increasing bee visits increased seed set for all three bee species, with the steepest slope for leafcutting bees, followed by bumble bees, and finally honey bees. CONCLUSIONS: Floral display size influenced pollinator attraction more consistently than flower color. The same plant traits affected the probability of not being visited and the number of pollinator visits received. The impact of plant attractiveness on female reproductive success varied, together with pollinator effectiveness, by pollinator species. |
| Author | Bauer, Austin A. Clayton, Murray K. Brunet, Johanne |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Austin A. surname: Bauer fullname: Bauer, Austin A. organization: Department of Entomology, 1630 Linden Drive, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: Murray K. surname: Clayton fullname: Clayton, Murray K. organization: Department of Statistics, 1300 University Avenue, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA – sequence: 3 givenname: Johanne surname: Brunet fullname: Brunet, Johanne organization: USDA–Agricultural Research Service, Vegetable Crop Research Unit, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28533203$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqF0c9rFDEUB_AgFbutnjwrA16EMjV5-TU51sVWpeBFz0OSedEsszNrkqn0vzfLrgo91EMIIZ8X3sv3jJxM84SEvGT0kmsO7-zGXTJFqaDyCVkxyXULzOgTsqKUQmsYwCk5y3lTj0YYeEZOoZOcA-Ursr4e52THpiQbS27iFMYFJx-n781utFNpbKlXvsQ7nDDnpsxN-ZEQG1dX3qGPmJ-Tp8GOGV8c93Py7frD1_XH9vbLzaf11W3rhWTQCmmcs4G7IRiHzA9SBwxKBJQWHAwUuBx8sGgEoDQetB7UMLjgLbIOPT8nbw_v7tL8c8Fc-m3MHsfaJ85L7qEOKEBp1v2XMkOZlqAEr_TNA7qZlzTVQfZKdUqpTlT1-qgWt8Wh36W4tem-__OTFVwcgE9zzgnDX8Jov8-przn1x5yqZg-0j8WWOE_7IMbHa37FEe8fe76_-vweqNZQa14daja5zOlf10owajrKfwNp2q3K |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s12595_019_00302_9 crossref_primary_10_3390_plants10081564 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anbehav_2023_09_008 crossref_primary_10_1111_csp2_12801 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2022_964941 crossref_primary_10_1093_biolinnean_blab027 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2745_70103 crossref_primary_10_1080_01916122_2025_2549985 crossref_primary_10_1093_jee_toac066 crossref_primary_10_1111_een_13098 crossref_primary_10_1002_ajb2_1683 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10841_020_00225_3 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_88394_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2023_103659 crossref_primary_10_1093_aob_mcad121 crossref_primary_10_1093_aob_mcae057 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_14205 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_70518_9 crossref_primary_10_3389_fevo_2021_719838 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_26858_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12374_024_09436_6 crossref_primary_10_1093_aobpla_plaf047 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_70027 crossref_primary_10_1080_03949370_2020_1755371 crossref_primary_10_3390_insects9030114 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11252_022_01242_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00442_020_04674_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40011_017_0954_9 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0271780 crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_10617 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2024_1363496 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00468_023_02487_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2022_108161 crossref_primary_10_1093_aobpla_plac041 crossref_primary_10_3389_fevo_2021_589781 crossref_primary_10_1002_ecs2_4606 crossref_primary_10_36899_japs_2025_3_0059 crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_4256 crossref_primary_10_1111_eea_13201 crossref_primary_10_1111_nph_20219 crossref_primary_10_1086_705591 crossref_primary_10_1086_708385 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00114_024_01888_7 crossref_primary_10_1093_aob_mcy181 crossref_primary_10_1093_ee_nvz133 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0266467421000341 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0237484 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2020_587528 crossref_primary_10_1002_ajb2_1846 crossref_primary_10_3390_plants11162172 crossref_primary_10_3390_insects12080688 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gecco_2025_e03482 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0212561 crossref_primary_10_33448_rsd_v14i8_49440 crossref_primary_10_1007_s41207_024_00498_z crossref_primary_10_1002_ajb2_1372 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2018_00812 crossref_primary_10_3390_ecologies4030039 crossref_primary_10_3390_insects12111029 crossref_primary_10_3390_insects15060427 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10531_019_01729_4 crossref_primary_10_1093_jee_toy211 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2021_700708 crossref_primary_10_1080_15427528_2022_2059604 crossref_primary_10_1093_aob_mcae186 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1126/science.1215198 10.1007/BF00190398 10.1007/BF00199331 10.1093/aob/mcr193 10.1086/335806 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2002.00457.x 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01293.x 10.1007/s00359-014-0915-1 10.1007/BF00192415 10.3732/apps.1300088 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2004.00812.x 10.1007/s10071-013-0704-1 10.1007/s002650000213 10.1146/annurev.en.02.010157.002035 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04304.x 10.3732/ajb.90.11.1612 10.1002/ece3.2372 10.1073/pnas.96.21.11910 10.1038/nature02106 10.2307/2657109 10.1007/BF02856594 10.2135/cropsci1967.0011183X000700010021x 10.1371/journal.pone.0000556 10.1098/rspb.2012.1621 10.1146/annurev.ento.010908.164537 10.1080/0028825X.2013.806933 10.1086/285637 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00644.x 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2001.00219.x 10.2307/3803088 10.1007/s00040-014-0366-2 10.3732/ajb.94.2.203 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2005.00988.x 10.1098/rspb.2010.2412 10.2135/cropsci1965.0011183X000500030023x 10.1086/683339 10.1371/journal.pone.0012049 10.1093/aob/mcp096 10.1073/pnas.071053098 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00699.x 10.1007/s00265-009-0731-8 10.1007/s00114-004-0508-x 10.1007/BF02214154 10.1603/0022-0493-95.1.22 10.1146/annurev-ento-120709-144836 10.1007/s11284-011-0908-2 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03410.x 10.1105/tpc.106.048694 10.1093/aob/mcv028 10.1146/annurev.en.11.010166.001103 10.1007/BF00243394 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1990.tb00839.x 10.4141/cjps94-139 10.1016/S0065-3454(06)36007-X |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2017 Bauer et al. 2017 Botanical Society of America 2017 Bauer et al. Published by the Botanical Society of America. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons public domain license (CC0 1.0). Copyright Botanical Society of America, Inc. May 2017 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2017 Bauer et al. – notice: 2017 Botanical Society of America – notice: 2017 Bauer et al. Published by the Botanical Society of America. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons public domain license (CC0 1.0). – notice: Copyright Botanical Society of America, Inc. May 2017 |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QL 7SN 7SS 7ST 7U9 8FD C1K FR3 H94 M7N P64 RC3 SOI 7X8 7S9 L.6 |
| DOI | 10.3732/ajb.1600405 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Environment Abstracts Virology and AIDS Abstracts Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Engineering Research Database AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Environment Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Entomology Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Virology and AIDS Abstracts Technology Research Database Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Engineering Research Database Ecology Abstracts Environment Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE AGRICOLA Entomology Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Botany |
| EISSN | 1537-2197 |
| EndPage | 781 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 28533203 10_3732_ajb_1600405 AJB20772 26410980 |
| Genre | article Journal Article Feature |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture funderid: 2013‐33522‐20999 |
| GroupedDBID | --- -DZ -~X 0R~ 1OC 23M 2AX 2FS 2KS 2WC 33P 4.4 53G 5GY 5VS 6J9 85S AAHBH AAHKG AAHQN AAISJ AAKGQ AAMMB AAMNL AANLZ AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABBHK ABCUV ABJNI ABLJU ABPLY ABPPZ ABSQW ABTLG ABXSQ ACAHQ ACCZN ACGFO ACGOD ACHIC ACKOT ACNCT ACPOU ACPRK ACSTJ ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADHUB ADKYN ADNWM ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEFGJ AEIGN AENEX AEUPB AEUYR AEYWJ AFAZZ AFFNX AFFPM AFRAH AFWVQ AGFXO AGUYK AGXDD AGYGG AHBTC AHXOZ AIDQK AIDYY AILXY AITYG AIURR ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMYDB AQVQM BFHJK BKOMP CBGCD CS3 CUYZI D0L DCZOG DEVKO DRFUL DRSTM E.L E3Z EBS ECGQY EJD F5P H13 HGLYW H~9 IPSME JAAYA JBMMH JBS JEB JENOY JHFFW JKQEH JLS JLXEF JPM JST KQ8 L7B LATKE LEEKS LU7 LUTES LYRES MEWTI MV1 N9A NHB O9- OK1 OMK P2P P2W PQQKQ RHI ROL RXW SA0 SJN SUPJJ TAE TBT TN5 TR2 UHB UKR UPT USG W8F WH7 WIN WOHZO WOQ WXSBR X6Y XSW XZL YZZ ZCA ZUP ZVN ZZTAW ~02 ~KM 1OB 24P 42X 6TJ 79B AAHHS AAYOK ABCQX ABDPE ABEFU ABTAH ACCFJ ACGFS ADULT ADZOD AEEZP AEQDE AFQQW AGNAY AI. AIDAL AIWBW AJBDE AS~ BIYOS C1A DOOOF GTFYD HGD HQ2 HTVGU JSODD K-O MVM NEJ OHT QZG RHF RJQFR SAMSI SKT UQL VH1 VQA WHG WYJ XOL YSQ YV5 YXE YYP ZCG ZY4 AAYXX ABUFD ADXHL AGHNM AIQQE CITATION LH4 CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QL 7SN 7SS 7ST 7U9 8FD C1K FR3 H94 M7N P64 RC3 SOI 7X8 7S9 L.6 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4512-459bbaf3bdf9be1cd57fef64fe5a2b2d0235dcfae942e59c277d6ddbfcae18ec3 |
| IEDL.DBID | WIN |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 67 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000402016000014&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 0002-9122 1537-2197 |
| IngestDate | Fri Sep 05 17:25:39 EDT 2025 Sun Nov 09 04:38:40 EST 2025 Wed Aug 13 04:58:50 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:08:53 EDT 2025 Thu Oct 09 00:34:49 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:37:31 EST 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:19:24 EST 2025 Thu Jul 03 22:06:16 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 5 |
| Keywords | bumble bee honey bee flower color floral display size Medicago sativa pollinator visits zero-inflated Poisson regression pollinator leafcutting bee reproductive success |
| Language | English |
| License | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor 2017 Bauer et al. Published by the Botanical Society of America. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons public domain license (CC0 1.0). |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4512-459bbaf3bdf9be1cd57fef64fe5a2b2d0235dcfae942e59c277d6ddbfcae18ec3 |
| Notes | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.3732/ajb.1600405 |
| PMID | 28533203 |
| PQID | 1906866684 |
| PQPubID | 30240 |
| PageCount | 10 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2000426718 proquest_miscellaneous_1901752643 proquest_journals_1906866684 pubmed_primary_28533203 crossref_primary_10_3732_ajb_1600405 crossref_citationtrail_10_3732_ajb_1600405 wiley_primary_10_3732_ajb_1600405_AJB20772 jstor_primary_26410980 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | May 2017 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2017-05-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2017 text: May 2017 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Columbus |
| PublicationTitle | American journal of botany |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Am J Bot |
| PublicationYear | 2017 |
| Publisher | Botanical Society of America, Inc Botanical Society of America |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Botanical Society of America, Inc – name: Botanical Society of America |
| References | 2002; 16 2010; 55 2011; 278 2000; 48 2002; 95 1994; 175 2006; 36 2010; 188 2011; 56 1995; 177 1953; 115 1995; 373 2014; 61 1994; 60 1996; 105 1990; 41 1994; 143 2003; 90 2014; 2 2013; 51 2000; 54 1965; 5 2015; 176 1999; 96 2012; 27 2007; 2 2014; 17 2007; 21 2001; 57 2010; 5 1994; 74 2009; 18 2014; 200 2001; 98 2007; 19 2009; 63 2010; 2010 2012 2007; 94 1991 1957; 2 2004; 91 2012; 109 2001; 65 1991; 5 1967; 7 1992; 170 2005; 19 2003; 426 2004; 18 2015; 115 2016 2015 2012; 279 2009; 103 1966 e_1_2_7_5_1 e_1_2_7_3_1 e_1_2_7_9_1 e_1_2_7_7_1 e_1_2_7_19_1 e_1_2_7_60_1 e_1_2_7_17_1 e_1_2_7_15_1 e_1_2_7_41_1 e_1_2_7_13_1 e_1_2_7_43_1 e_1_2_7_45_1 e_1_2_7_47_1 e_1_2_7_26_1 e_1_2_7_49_1 e_1_2_7_28_1 e_1_2_7_50_1 e_1_2_7_25_1 e_1_2_7_31_1 e_1_2_7_52_1 e_1_2_7_23_1 e_1_2_7_33_1 e_1_2_7_54_1 e_1_2_7_21_1 e_1_2_7_35_1 e_1_2_7_56_1 e_1_2_7_37_1 e_1_2_7_58_1 e_1_2_7_39_1 e_1_2_7_6_1 e_1_2_7_8_1 e_1_2_7_18_1 e_1_2_7_16_1 e_1_2_7_40_1 e_1_2_7_2_1 e_1_2_7_14_1 e_1_2_7_42_1 e_1_2_7_12_1 e_1_2_7_44_1 e_1_2_7_10_1 Brunet J. (e_1_2_7_11_1) 2010; 2010 e_1_2_7_46_1 e_1_2_7_27_1 e_1_2_7_29_1 R Development Core Team (e_1_2_7_48_1) 2015 e_1_2_7_51_1 e_1_2_7_30_1 e_1_2_7_53_1 e_1_2_7_24_1 e_1_2_7_32_1 e_1_2_7_55_1 e_1_2_7_22_1 e_1_2_7_34_1 e_1_2_7_57_1 Banschback V. S. (e_1_2_7_4_1) 1994; 175 e_1_2_7_20_1 e_1_2_7_36_1 e_1_2_7_59_1 e_1_2_7_38_1 |
| References_xml | – volume: 188 start-page: 393 year: 2010 end-page: 402 article-title: Pollinators exert natural selection on flower size and floral display in publication-title: New Phytologist – volume: 61 start-page: 325 year: 2014 end-page: 336 article-title: Getting to the start line: How honey bees and bumble bees are visually guided towards their first floral contact publication-title: Insectes Sociaux – volume: 90 start-page: 1612 year: 2003 end-page: 1618 article-title: Linking pollinator visitation rate and pollen receipt publication-title: American Journal of Botany – volume: 27 start-page: 377 year: 2012 end-page: 385 article-title: Pollinator response to flower color polymorphism and floral display in a plant with a single‐locus floral color polymorphism: Consequences for plant reproduction publication-title: Ecological Research – year: 1966 article-title: The utilization and management of bumble bees for red clover and alfalfa seed production publication-title: Annual Review of Entomology – year: 2016 article-title: Seed set variation in wild populations: Teasing apart the effects of seasonal resource depletion, pollen quality and pollen quantity publication-title: Ecology and Evolution – volume: 18 start-page: 3745 year: 2009 end-page: 3758 article-title: The influence of distinct pollinators on female and male reproductive success in the Rocky Mountain columbine publication-title: Molecular Ecology – volume: 96 start-page: 11910 year: 1999 end-page: 11915 article-title: Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers ( ) publication-title: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA – volume: 177 start-page: 1 year: 1995 end-page: 19 article-title: Innate colour preferences of flower visitors publication-title: Journal of Comparative Physiology A – volume: 18 start-page: 116 year: 2004 end-page: 124 article-title: The influence of floral display size on pollinator visitation patterns publication-title: Functional Ecology – volume: 426 start-page: 176 year: 2003 end-page: 178 article-title: Allele substitution at a flower colour locus produces a pollinator shift in monkey flowers publication-title: Nature – volume: 170 start-page: 23 year: 1992 end-page: 40 article-title: The spectral input systems of hymenopteran insects and their receptor‐based colour vision publication-title: Journal of Comparative Physiology A – volume: 94 start-page: 203 year: 2007 end-page: 209 article-title: Visitation, effectiveness, and efficiency of 15 genera of visitors to wild radish, (Brassicaceae) publication-title: American Journal of Botany – volume: 176 start-page: 811 year: 2015 end-page: 819 article-title: The effects of flower, floral display and reward sizes on bumble bee foraging behavior when pollen is the reward and plants are dichogamous publication-title: International Journal of Plant Sciences – volume: 105 start-page: 509 year: 1996 end-page: 516 article-title: Effects of flower size and number on pollinator visitation to wild radish, publication-title: Oecologia – volume: 60 start-page: 83 year: 1994 end-page: 139 article-title: Bateman's principle and plant reproduction: The role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set publication-title: Botanical Review – volume: 115 start-page: 129 year: 1953 end-page: 138 article-title: Botanical Gazette – volume: 91 start-page: 224 year: 2004 end-page: 227 article-title: Fine colour discrimination requires differential conditioning in bumblebees publication-title: Naturwissenschaften – volume: 2 start-page: e556 year: 2007 article-title: The adaptive significance of sensory bias in a foraging context: Floral colour preferences in the bumble bee publication-title: PLoS ONE – volume: 7 start-page: 59 year: 1967 end-page: 62 article-title: Cross‐pollination studies involving three purple‐flowered alfalfas, one white‐flowered line, and two pollinator species publication-title: Crop Science – volume: 373 start-page: 512 year: 1995 end-page: 515 article-title: Mating cost of large floral displays in hermaphrodite plants publication-title: Nature – volume: 95 start-page: 22 year: 2002 end-page: 27 article-title: Pollinating bees (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) of U.S. alfalfa compared for rates of pod and seed set publication-title: Journal of Economic Entomology – volume: 48 start-page: 36 year: 2000 end-page: 43 article-title: Color choices by bumble bees ( ): Innate preferences and generalization after learning publication-title: Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology – volume: 5 start-page: 370 year: 1991 end-page: 384 article-title: The effects of floral display on pollinator visitation vary among populations of (Hydrophyllaceae) publication-title: Evolutionary Ecology – volume: 200 start-page: 411 year: 2014 end-page: 433 article-title: Mechanisms, functions and ecology of colour vision in the honeybee publication-title: Journal of Comparative Physiology A – volume: 103 start-page: 1567 year: 2009 end-page: 1578 article-title: Pollinators of the Rocky Mountain columbine: Temporal variation, functional groups and associations with floral traits publication-title: Annals of Botany – year: 2015 – volume: 63 start-page: 1207 year: 2009 end-page: 1218 article-title: A population comparison of the strength and persistence of innate colour preference and learning speed in the bumblebee publication-title: Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology – volume: 2 start-page: 1300088 year: 2014 article-title: Quantifying color variation: Improved formulas for calculating hue with segment classification publication-title: Applications in Plant Sciences – volume: 56 start-page: 221 year: 2011 end-page: 237 article-title: The alfalfa leafcutting bee, : The world's most intensively managed solitary bee publication-title: Annual Review of Entomology – volume: 36 start-page: 305 year: 2006 end-page: 354 article-title: Adaptation, genetic drift, pleiotropy, and history in the evolution of bee foraging behavior publication-title: Advances in the Study of Behavior – volume: 57 start-page: 219 year: 2001 end-page: 223 article-title: A score test for testing a zero‐inflated Poisson regression model against zero‐inflated negative binomial alternatives publication-title: Biometrics – volume: 115 start-page: 971 year: 2015 end-page: 979 article-title: The role of pollinators in maintaining variation in flower colour in the Rocky Mountain columbine, publication-title: Annals of Botany – volume: 143 start-page: 870 year: 1994 end-page: 889 article-title: Effects of floral traits, pollinator visitation, and plant size on fruit production publication-title: American Naturalist – volume: 177 start-page: 247 year: 1995 end-page: 259 article-title: Colour preferences of flower‐naive honeybees publication-title: Journal of Comparative Physiology A – volume: 279 start-page: 4845 year: 2012 end-page: 4852 article-title: Diverse pollinator communities enhance plant reproductive success publication-title: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B – volume: 5 start-page: e12049 year: 2010 article-title: Photoreceptor spectral sensitivity in the bumblebee, (Hymenoptera: Apidae) publication-title: PLoS ONE – volume: 19 start-page: 779 year: 2007 end-page: 790 article-title: Single gene‐mediated shift in pollinator attraction in Petunia publication-title: Plant Cell – volume: 74 start-page: 779 year: 1994 end-page: 783 article-title: Attractiveness of alfalfa ( L.) to wild pollinators in relation to wildflowers publication-title: Canadian Journal of Plant Sciences – volume: 98 start-page: 3898 year: 2001 end-page: 3903 article-title: Visual constraints in foraging bumblebees: Flower size and color affect search time and flight behavior publication-title: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,USA – volume: 170 start-page: 533 year: 1992 end-page: 543 article-title: The colour hexagon: A chromaticity diagram based on photoreceptor excitations as a generalized representation of colour opponency publication-title: Journal of Comparative Physiology A – volume: 19 start-page: 383 year: 2005 end-page: 390 article-title: Functional Ecology – volume: 65 start-page: 373 year: 2001 end-page: 378 article-title: Suggestions for presenting the results of data analyses publication-title: Journal of Wildlife Management – volume: 2 start-page: 355 year: 1957 end-page: 380 article-title: Pollination of alfalfa and red clover publication-title: Annual Review of Entomology – volume: 41 start-page: 315 year: 1990 end-page: 352 article-title: On the measurement and classification of colour in studies of animal colour patterns publication-title: Biological Journal of the Linnean Society – volume: 54 start-page: 1533 year: 2000 end-page: 1545 article-title: Evolution of floral display in (Pontederiaceae): Direct and correlated responses to selection on flower size and number publication-title: Evolution – volume: 16 start-page: 492 year: 2002 end-page: 503 article-title: Visit larger displays but probe proportionally fewer flowers: Counterintuitive behaviour of nectar‐collecting bumble bees achieves an ideal free distribution publication-title: Functional Ecology – volume: 17 start-page: 723 year: 2014 end-page: 734 article-title: Serial reversal learning in bumblebees ( publication-title: Animal Cognition – volume: 5 start-page: 267 year: 1965 end-page: 268 article-title: Flower color, a factor in attractiveness of alfalfa clones for honey bees. publication-title: Crop Science – volume: 21 start-page: 854 year: 2007 end-page: 863 article-title: Experience changes pollinator responses to floral display size: From size‐based to reward‐based foraging publication-title: Functional Ecology – volume: 55 start-page: 267 year: 2010 end-page: 284 article-title: Honey bees as a model for vision, perception and cognition publication-title: Annual Review of Entomology – volume: 51 start-page: 181 year: 2013 end-page: 193 article-title: Hymenopteran pollinators as agents of selection on flower colour in the New Zealand mountains: Salient chromatic signals enhance flower discrimination publication-title: New Zealand Journal of Botany – volume: 109 start-page: 563 year: 2012 end-page: 570 article-title: Effects of floral display size on male and female reproductive success in publication-title: Annals of Botany – year: 1991 – volume: 175 start-page: 107 year: 1994 end-page: 114 article-title: Colour association influences honey bee choice between sucrose concentrations publication-title: Journal of Comparative Physiology A – year: 2012 article-title: Pollinator‐mediated selection on flower color allele drives reinforcement publication-title: Science – volume: 278 start-page: 952 year: 2011 end-page: 959 article-title: Colour processing in complex environments: Insights from the visual systems of bees publication-title: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B – volume: 2010 start-page: 201858 year: 2010 article-title: Impact of bee species and plant density on alfalfa pollination and potential for gene flow publication-title: Psyche (Cambridge, Massachusetts) – ident: e_1_2_7_30_1 doi: 10.1126/science.1215198 – ident: e_1_2_7_46_1 doi: 10.1007/BF00190398 – ident: e_1_2_7_15_1 doi: 10.1007/BF00199331 – ident: e_1_2_7_34_1 doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr193 – ident: e_1_2_7_44_1 doi: 10.1086/335806 – ident: e_1_2_7_26_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2002.00457.x – ident: e_1_2_7_36_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01293.x – ident: e_1_2_7_27_1 doi: 10.1007/s00359-014-0915-1 – ident: e_1_2_7_33_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_23_1 doi: 10.1007/BF00192415 – volume: 175 start-page: 107 year: 1994 ident: e_1_2_7_4_1 article-title: Colour association influences honey bee choice between sucrose concentrations publication-title: Journal of Comparative Physiology A – ident: e_1_2_7_55_1 doi: 10.3732/apps.1300088 – ident: e_1_2_7_40_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2004.00812.x – ident: e_1_2_7_58_1 doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0704-1 – volume: 2010 start-page: 201858 year: 2010 ident: e_1_2_7_11_1 article-title: Impact of bee species and plant density on alfalfa pollination and potential for gene flow publication-title: Psyche (Cambridge, Massachusetts) – ident: e_1_2_7_25_1 doi: 10.1007/s002650000213 – ident: e_1_2_7_38_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_6_1 doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.02.010157.002035 – ident: e_1_2_7_10_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04304.x – ident: e_1_2_7_22_1 doi: 10.3732/ajb.90.11.1612 – ident: e_1_2_7_31_1 doi: 10.1002/ece3.2372 – ident: e_1_2_7_53_1 doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.21.11910 – ident: e_1_2_7_7_1 doi: 10.1038/nature02106 – ident: e_1_2_7_17_1 doi: 10.2307/2657109 – ident: e_1_2_7_13_1 doi: 10.1007/BF02856594 – ident: e_1_2_7_45_1 doi: 10.2135/cropsci1967.0011183X000700010021x – ident: e_1_2_7_49_1 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000556 – ident: e_1_2_7_2_1 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1621 – ident: e_1_2_7_57_1 doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.010908.164537 – ident: e_1_2_7_5_1 doi: 10.1080/0028825X.2013.806933 – volume-title: R: A language and environment for statistical computing year: 2015 ident: e_1_2_7_48_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_39_1 doi: 10.1086/285637 – ident: e_1_2_7_41_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00644.x – ident: e_1_2_7_51_1 doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2001.00219.x – ident: e_1_2_7_3_1 doi: 10.2307/3803088 – ident: e_1_2_7_42_1 doi: 10.1007/s00040-014-0366-2 – ident: e_1_2_7_52_1 doi: 10.3732/ajb.94.2.203 – ident: e_1_2_7_24_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2005.00988.x – ident: e_1_2_7_19_1 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2412 – ident: e_1_2_7_16_1 doi: 10.2135/cropsci1965.0011183X000500030023x – ident: e_1_2_7_12_1 doi: 10.1086/683339 – ident: e_1_2_7_54_1 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012049 – ident: e_1_2_7_9_1 doi: 10.1093/aob/mcp096 – ident: e_1_2_7_56_1 doi: 10.1073/pnas.071053098 – ident: e_1_2_7_60_1 doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00699.x – ident: e_1_2_7_32_1 doi: 10.1007/s00265-009-0731-8 – ident: e_1_2_7_18_1 doi: 10.1007/s00114-004-0508-x – ident: e_1_2_7_20_1 doi: 10.1007/BF02214154 – ident: e_1_2_7_14_1 doi: 10.1603/0022-0493-95.1.22 – ident: e_1_2_7_47_1 doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-120709-144836 – ident: e_1_2_7_37_1 doi: 10.1007/s11284-011-0908-2 – ident: e_1_2_7_43_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03410.x – ident: e_1_2_7_28_1 doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.048694 – ident: e_1_2_7_59_1 doi: 10.1093/aob/mcv028 – ident: e_1_2_7_29_1 doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.11.010166.001103 – ident: e_1_2_7_35_1 doi: 10.1007/BF00243394 – ident: e_1_2_7_21_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1990.tb00839.x – ident: e_1_2_7_8_1 doi: 10.4141/cjps94-139 – ident: e_1_2_7_50_1 doi: 10.1016/S0065-3454(06)36007-X |
| SSID | ssj0009492 |
| Score | 2.4606826 |
| Snippet | PREMISE OF THE STUDY:
The ability to attract pollinators is crucial to plants that rely on insects for pollination. We contrasted the roles of floral display... The ability to attract pollinators is crucial to plants that rely on insects for pollination. We contrasted the roles of floral display size and flower color... PREMISE OF THE STUDY: The ability to attract pollinators is crucial to plants that rely on insects for pollination. We contrasted the roles of floral display... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref wiley jstor |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 772 |
| SubjectTerms | Animals Attraction Bees Bombus Botany Breeding success bumble bee Color Correlation analysis females floral display size flower color Flowers Flowers - anatomy & histology honey bee honey bees Insects leafcutting bee Medicago sativa Megachilidae Plant reproduction Plants pollinating insects Pollination pollinator pollinator visits Pollinators probability Regression analysis Reproduction reproductive success RESEARCH ARTICLE Seed set zero‐inflated Poisson regression |
| Subtitle | Consequences for plant reproductive success |
| Title | Floral traits influencing plant attractiveness to three bee species |
| URI | https://www.jstor.org/stable/26410980 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.3732%2Fajb.1600405 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28533203 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1906866684 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1901752643 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2000426718 |
| Volume | 104 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000402016000014&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library customDbUrl: eissn: 1537-2197 dateEnd: 20241213 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0009492 issn: 0002-9122 databaseCode: WIN dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com providerName: Wiley-Blackwell – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library Full Collection 2020 customDbUrl: eissn: 1537-2197 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0009492 issn: 0002-9122 databaseCode: DRFUL dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3fS9xAEB5a60NfamtrG2uPFXwSQpPNJtn1TW2PtshRSsV7C_sTLMfd4eUE_3tnNrlTQQulD3nKTNjszux8k-x8A3Ag81Cg24S01rZMRSVL3Ae9TxHdY7jMMm1MJHE9q0cjOR6rn_3ZHKqF6fgh1h_cyDPifk0Ork3sQlLUBZGG6j-GPo2gEVKJeS6iW158H91R7grFV-BX5Zx31Xmk_fme7oN41B1JfAxsPsSuMfgMt_5z2K_hVY862XFnJm_gmZ9uw-bJDJHhzVuYDydUp8-oXUS7YJd93xIMamw-wZlnum1jMVW3MbJ2xlo0Ac8MXlSqidn2ETu9dy6bIRTudYk1M5LKojZbLGN_xndwPvz6-_Rb2ndiSK1ARJCKUhmjQ2FcUMbn1pV18KESwZeaG-6INMfZoL0S3JfK8rp2lXMmWO1z6W2xAxvT2dR_ACYRT3Btde5MIUTmtOJSukpnmGrWVRUSOFytR2N7mnJ6_UmD6QrNYYMz2PQzmMDBWnjesXM8LrYTF3Ytgygwz5TMEthbrXTT--6iQYhUSczqpEhgf30bvY5-peipny2jDOIufEzxtAwVQSH-weCfwPvOiu4GgCip4BlqH0Zj-dvom-MfJzzDLGj3X4Q_wktOCCSezdyDjfZq6T_Bpr1uLxdXA3hej-UAXnz5NTw_G0S_uQV3mBgw |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3da9swED-2tLC97Lub127ToE8FM1uWbalvbdfQbVkYo4W-GX1CS0hC4wz23-9OdtIWusHog598ErJ0p_udrPsdwK7MQ4FmE9Ja2zIVlSxxH_Q-RXSP7jLLtDGRxHVUj8fy_Fz96A_cKBem44dYH7iRZcT9mgycDqTJyou6INZQfWnobAS1sHwIGwIVqRzAxuefw7PRNe2uUHwFgFXOeZehRx18utH8lk_qriXeBThv49fogIZP7zv0Z_Ckh57soNOV5_DAT1_A5uEM4eHvlzAfTihZn1HNiHbBLvriJejZ2HyC089028aMqm53ZO2MtagHnhl8KF8TQ-59dnTjcjZDPNy3JerMyCyLrdliGYs0voKz4fHp0Unal2NIrUBYkIpSGaNDYVxQxufWlXXwoRLBl5ob7og5x9mgvRLcl8ryunaVcyZY7XPpbbEFg-ls6t8AkwgquLY6d6YQInNacSldpTOMN-uqCgnsrRaksT1XOX3-pMGYheawwRls-hlMYHctPO8oOu4W24oru5ZBKJhnSmYJ7KyWuukNeNEgTqokhnZSJPBx_RpNj_6n6KmfLaMMgi_spvi7DGVCIQhCBJDA606NrgeAUKngGbbei9ryr9E3B18PeYah0Nv_Ef4Aj05Ov4-a0Zfxt214zAmSxMuaOzBor5b-HWzaX-3F4up9bzh_APtnGvQ |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3dSxwxEB-sSumLrW1t19o2BZ-EpbvZ7G7im1-LrcchpYJvSz7Bctwd3l6h_72TbO5U0IL4sE87E7KTmeQ32cwvALs8dwWGjUtrqcuUVbzEedDaFNE9LpdZJpUKJK6Dejjkl5fiPG64-VqYnh9iueHmIyPM1z7A7dQ4H-VFXXjWUPlH-b0R9MLyBayxUlQYmGvHv5qLwS3tLhN0AYBFTmlfoecb-H5H_d6a1B9LfAhw3sevYQFqXj-3629gI0JPctD7yias2PFbWD-cIDz89w6mzcgX6xN_Z0Q3I1fx8hJc2ch0hOYnsutCRVU_O5JuQjr0A0sUPr5eE1PufXJ053A2QTwcdT11ZmCWRW0ym4dLGt_DRXPy--g0jdcxpJohLEjRwkpJVyjjhLK5NmXtrKuYs6WkihrPnGO0k1YwakuhaV2byhjltLQ5t7rYgtXxZGw_AuEIKqjUMjeqYCwzUlDOTSUzzDfrqnIJ7C0GpNWRq9x__qjFnMXbsEULttGCCewuhac9RcfDYlthZJcyCAXzTPAsgZ3FULcxgGct4qSKY2rHWQLflq8x9Pz_FDm2k3mQQfCFzRSPy_hKKARBiAAS-NC70W0HECoVNEPtveAt_-t9e_DzkGaYCm0_RfgrvDw_btrBj-HZJ3hFPSIJZzV3YLW7ntvPsK7_dlez6y8xbm4AX4Iabw |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Floral+traits+influencing+plant+attractiveness+to+three+bee+species%3A+Consequences+for+plant+reproductive+success&rft.jtitle=American+journal+of+botany&rft.au=Bauer%2C+Austin+A.&rft.au=Clayton%2C+Murray+K.&rft.au=Brunet%2C+Johanne&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.issn=0002-9122&rft.eissn=1537-2197&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=772&rft.epage=781&rft_id=info:doi/10.3732%2Fajb.1600405&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_3732_ajb_1600405 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0002-9122&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0002-9122&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0002-9122&client=summon |