Narrow Diameter Dental Implants as an Alternative Treatment for Atrophic Alveolar Ridges. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

To determine the marginal bone loss and the survival, success and failure rates of narrow dental implants, a systematic literature search was carried out in the MEDLINE (Pubmed), Cochrane, Scopus, and Scielo databases for articles published between 2010 and 2021. The exclusion criteria were: systema...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Materials Ročník 14; číslo 12; s. 3234
Hlavní autoři: González-Valls, Georgina, Roca-Millan, Elisabet, Céspedes-Sánchez, Juan Manuel, González-Navarro, Beatriz, Torrejon-Moya, Aina, López-López, José
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Basel MDPI AG 11.06.2021
MDPI
Témata:
Bias
Cigarettes
Clinical trials
Data collection
Dental implants
Edentulous
Failure rates
Literature reviews
Meta-analysis
Orthodontics
Statistical analysis
Success
Survival
Systematic Review
United States > US
ISSN:1996-1944, 1996-1944
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:To determine the marginal bone loss and the survival, success and failure rates of narrow dental implants, a systematic literature search was carried out in the MEDLINE (Pubmed), Cochrane, Scopus, and Scielo databases for articles published between 2010 and 2021. The exclusion criteria were: systematic reviews, case reports, expert opinions; animal studies; samples of less than 10 subjects; follow-up periods of less than 36 months; smokers of minimum 10 cigarettes/day; and articles about mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage. Meta-analyses were performed to assess marginal bone loss and implant survival, success, and failure rates. Fifteen studies were included: 7 clinical trials, 3 randomized clinical trials, 3 cohort studies, and 2 case series. The total number of subjects was 773, in whom 1245 implants were placed. The survival rate for the narrow diameter implants was 97%, the success rate 96.8%, and the failure rate 3%. Marginal bone loss was 0.821 mm. All these data were evaluated at 36 months. Based on the literature, it can be considered that there is sufficient evidence to consider small diameter implants a predictable treatment option. These show favorable survival and success rates and marginal bone loss. All of them are comparable to those of standard diameter dental implants.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1996-1944
1996-1944
DOI:10.3390/ma14123234