Stronger shared taste for natural aesthetic domains than for artifacts of human culture

•Aesthetic judgments of faces and natural landscapes show high “shared taste.”•Aesthetic judgments of paintings and architecture vary more across individuals.•Observers show similar test-retest reliability for all domains. Individuals can be aesthetically engaged by a diverse array of visual experie...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:

Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:	Cognition Ročník 179; s. 121 - 131
Hlavní autoři:	Vessel, Edward A., Maurer, Natalia, Denker, Alexander H., Starr, G. Gabrielle
Médium:	Journal Article
Jazyk:	angličtina
Vydáno:	Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.10.2018 Elsevier Science Ltd
Témata:	Aesthetics Agreements Architecture Artwork Between-subjects design Cultural differences Culture Faces Imagery Individual differences Information processing Information sources Landscape Landscapes Organizational culture Reliability Society Taste Visual experiences Landscapes Aesthetics Artwork Architecture Faces Individual differences
ISSN:	0010-0277, 1873-7838, 1873-7838
On-line přístup:	Získat plný text
Tagy:	Přidat tag Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!

Abstract	•Aesthetic judgments of faces and natural landscapes show high “shared taste.”•Aesthetic judgments of paintings and architecture vary more across individuals.•Observers show similar test-retest reliability for all domains. Individuals can be aesthetically engaged by a diverse array of visual experiences (paintings, mountain vistas, etc.), yet the processes that support this fundamental mode of interaction with the world are poorly understood. We tested whether there are systematic differences in the degree of shared taste across visual aesthetic domains. In Experiment 1, preferences were measured for five different visual aesthetic domains using a between-subjects design. The degree of agreement amongst participants differed by domain, with preferences for images of faces and landscapes containing a high proportion of shared taste, while preferences for images of exterior architecture, interior architecture and artworks reflected strong individual differences. Experiment 2 used a more powerful within-subjects design to compare the two most well matched domains—natural landscapes and exterior architecture. Agreement across individuals was significantly higher for natural landscapes than exterior architecture, with no differences in reliability. These results show that the degree of shared versus individual aesthetic preference differs systematically across visual domains, even for photographic images of real-world content. The findings suggest that the distinction between naturally occurring domains (e.g. faces and landscape) versus artifacts of human culture (e.g. architecture and artwork) is a general organizational principle governing the presence of shared aesthetic taste. We suggest that the behavioral relevance of naturally occurring domains results in information processing, and hence aesthetic experience, that is highly conserved across individuals; artifacts of human culture, which lack uniform behavioral relevance for most individuals, require the use of more individual aesthetic sensibilities that reflect varying experiences and different sources of information.
AbstractList	•Aesthetic judgments of faces and natural landscapes show high “shared taste.”•Aesthetic judgments of paintings and architecture vary more across individuals.•Observers show similar test-retest reliability for all domains. Individuals can be aesthetically engaged by a diverse array of visual experiences (paintings, mountain vistas, etc.), yet the processes that support this fundamental mode of interaction with the world are poorly understood. We tested whether there are systematic differences in the degree of shared taste across visual aesthetic domains. In Experiment 1, preferences were measured for five different visual aesthetic domains using a between-subjects design. The degree of agreement amongst participants differed by domain, with preferences for images of faces and landscapes containing a high proportion of shared taste, while preferences for images of exterior architecture, interior architecture and artworks reflected strong individual differences. Experiment 2 used a more powerful within-subjects design to compare the two most well matched domains—natural landscapes and exterior architecture. Agreement across individuals was significantly higher for natural landscapes than exterior architecture, with no differences in reliability. These results show that the degree of shared versus individual aesthetic preference differs systematically across visual domains, even for photographic images of real-world content. The findings suggest that the distinction between naturally occurring domains (e.g. faces and landscape) versus artifacts of human culture (e.g. architecture and artwork) is a general organizational principle governing the presence of shared aesthetic taste. We suggest that the behavioral relevance of naturally occurring domains results in information processing, and hence aesthetic experience, that is highly conserved across individuals; artifacts of human culture, which lack uniform behavioral relevance for most individuals, require the use of more individual aesthetic sensibilities that reflect varying experiences and different sources of information. Individuals can be aesthetically engaged by a diverse array of visual experiences (paintings, mountain vistas, etc.), yet the processes that support this fundamental mode of interaction with the world are poorly understood. We tested whether there are systematic differences in the degree of shared taste across visual aesthetic domains. In Experiment 1, preferences were measured for five different visual aesthetic domains using a between-subjects design. The degree of agreement amongst participants differed by domain, with preferences for images of faces and landscapes containing a high proportion of shared taste, while preferences for images of exterior architecture, interior architecture and artworks reflected strong individual differences. Experiment 2 used a more powerful within-subjects design to compare the two most well matched domains-natural landscapes and exterior architecture. Agreement across individuals was significantly higher for natural landscapes than exterior architecture, with no differences in reliability. These results show that the degree of shared versus individual aesthetic preference differs systematically across visual domains, even for photographic images of real-world content. The findings suggest that the distinction between naturally occurring domains (e.g. faces and landscape) versus artifacts of human culture (e.g. architecture and artwork) is a general organizational principle governing the presence of shared aesthetic taste. We suggest that the behavioral relevance of naturally occurring domains results in information processing, and hence aesthetic experience, that is highly conserved across individuals; artifacts of human culture, which lack uniform behavioral relevance for most individuals, require the use of more individual aesthetic sensibilities that reflect varying experiences and different sources of information. Individuals can be aesthetically engaged by a diverse array of visual experiences (paintings, mountain vistas, etc.), yet the processes that support this fundamental mode of interaction with the world are poorly understood. We tested whether there are systematic differences in the degree of shared taste across visual aesthetic domains. In Experiment 1, preferences were measured for five different visual aesthetic domains using a between-subjects design. The degree of agreement amongst participants differed by domain, with preferences for images of faces and landscapes containing a high proportion of shared taste, while preferences for images of exterior architecture, interior architecture and artworks reflected strong individual differences. Experiment 2 used a more powerful within-subjects design to compare the two most well matched domains-natural landscapes and exterior architecture. Agreement across individuals was significantly higher for natural landscapes than exterior architecture, with no differences in reliability. These results show that the degree of shared versus individual aesthetic preference differs systematically across visual domains, even for photographic images of real-world content. The findings suggest that the distinction between naturally occurring domains (e.g. faces and landscape) versus artifacts of human culture (e.g. architecture and artwork) is a general organizational principle governing the presence of shared aesthetic taste. We suggest that the behavioral relevance of naturally occurring domains results in information processing, and hence aesthetic experience, that is highly conserved across individuals; artifacts of human culture, which lack uniform behavioral relevance for most individuals, require the use of more individual aesthetic sensibilities that reflect varying experiences and different sources of information.Individuals can be aesthetically engaged by a diverse array of visual experiences (paintings, mountain vistas, etc.), yet the processes that support this fundamental mode of interaction with the world are poorly understood. We tested whether there are systematic differences in the degree of shared taste across visual aesthetic domains. In Experiment 1, preferences were measured for five different visual aesthetic domains using a between-subjects design. The degree of agreement amongst participants differed by domain, with preferences for images of faces and landscapes containing a high proportion of shared taste, while preferences for images of exterior architecture, interior architecture and artworks reflected strong individual differences. Experiment 2 used a more powerful within-subjects design to compare the two most well matched domains-natural landscapes and exterior architecture. Agreement across individuals was significantly higher for natural landscapes than exterior architecture, with no differences in reliability. These results show that the degree of shared versus individual aesthetic preference differs systematically across visual domains, even for photographic images of real-world content. The findings suggest that the distinction between naturally occurring domains (e.g. faces and landscape) versus artifacts of human culture (e.g. architecture and artwork) is a general organizational principle governing the presence of shared aesthetic taste. We suggest that the behavioral relevance of naturally occurring domains results in information processing, and hence aesthetic experience, that is highly conserved across individuals; artifacts of human culture, which lack uniform behavioral relevance for most individuals, require the use of more individual aesthetic sensibilities that reflect varying experiences and different sources of information.
Author	Maurer, Natalia Starr, G. Gabrielle Denker, Alexander H. Vessel, Edward A.
Author_xml	– sequence: 1 givenname: Edward A. surname: Vessel fullname: Vessel, Edward A. email: ed.vessel@ae.mpg.de organization: New York University, New York, United States – sequence: 2 givenname: Natalia surname: Maurer fullname: Maurer, Natalia organization: New York University, New York, United States – sequence: 3 givenname: Alexander H. surname: Denker fullname: Denker, Alexander H. organization: Emory University, United States – sequence: 4 givenname: G. Gabrielle surname: Starr fullname: Starr, G. Gabrielle organization: New York University, New York, United States
BackLink	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29936343$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark	eNqNkb1uFDEURi0URDaBVwBLNDQzubZnbU9BEUUQkCKlIBGl5fVP1qsZO9ieSLw93mxIkQYqS1fnXH2-3wk6iik6hD4Q6AkQfrbrTbqLoYYUewpE9sB7gPEVWhEpWCckk0doBUCgAyrEMTopZQcAAxXyDTqm48g4G9gK_fxRc4p3LuOy1dlZXHWpDvuUcdR1yXrC2pW6dTUYbNOsQyy4bnV8RHSuwWtTC04eb5e5jc0yNc29Ra-9nop79_SeotuvX24uvnVX15ffL86vOjMMona2hR42mhK53hDK-CCs4SOXgpg1EMMssRvCQEuhLfHSM82ZF4xz7swIxLNT9Omw9z6nX0tLquZQjJsmHV1aiqKwHmEAwdcN_fgC3aUlx5ZOUUI4p8NIoVHvn6hlMzur7nOYdf6t_p6sAeIAmJxKyc4_IwTUvhy1U8_lqH05Crhq_2zm5xemCVXvsZp1mP7DPz_4rh30IbisigkuGmdDdqYqm8I_d_wB462wEw
CitedBy_id	crossref_primary_10_1016_j_isci_2024_110213 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvp_2021_101676 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actpsy_2021_103365 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cub_2022_02_039 crossref_primary_10_1108_IJICC_04_2021_0065 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_16584_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cub_2022_03_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tics_2021_03_008 crossref_primary_10_1002_pchj_606 crossref_primary_10_3390_app15063322 crossref_primary_10_1177_03010066241256221 crossref_primary_10_1177_02762374251334962 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2022_108288 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2020_576580 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2021_676032 crossref_primary_10_3390_bs13110907 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_91013_9 crossref_primary_10_1177_02762374221095701 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12124_022_09701_8 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_60091_w crossref_primary_10_1038_s41562_021_01124_6 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_2306025121 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_yjoc_2024_100076 crossref_primary_10_1002_pchj_556 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_68331_9 crossref_primary_10_1111_ejn_14557 crossref_primary_10_1177_09567976231188107 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2022_999720 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2018_00467 crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_a_01812 crossref_primary_10_1177_02762374231191088 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_58924_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00426_021_01592_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cognition_2024_106036 crossref_primary_10_1177_09567976231190546 crossref_primary_10_3390_s21062193 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuron_2020_10_022 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cognition_2020_104446 crossref_primary_10_1177_02762374251320823 crossref_primary_10_1057_s41599_025_04806_y crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2022_997498 crossref_primary_10_3390_urbansci6010003 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10670_023_00663_w crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2023_1114793 crossref_primary_10_3390_su122410656 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2021_541469 crossref_primary_10_1038_s42003_023_05710_4 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2022_933344 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2025_109238 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0232083 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0223896 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_newideapsych_2022_100946 crossref_primary_10_1002_pchj_415 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_newideapsych_2024_101095 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13414_023_02672_x crossref_primary_10_1177_0276237419897048 crossref_primary_10_1111_nyas_15106 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2019_02420 crossref_primary_10_3390_sym14020423 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_025_86056_1 crossref_primary_10_1177_02762374231165648 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2022_119218 crossref_primary_10_1098_rsos_241623 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tourman_2024_105116 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvp_2025_102553 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_newideapsych_2019_100760 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cortex_2020_01_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdmm_2023_100799 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2023_1146083 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_1902650116 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_73438_0 crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_7078 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvp_2023_102192 crossref_primary_10_1177_17470218221101876 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvp_2025_102709 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13428_019_01323_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2018_12_017 crossref_primary_10_1002_pchj_492
Cites_doi	10.1016/S0031-3203(98)00079-X 10.1167/10.2.18 10.1177/0013916500323002 10.1371/journal.pone.0122801 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 10.1177/001391659803000601 10.1023/A:1011139631724 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.06.001 10.1073/pnas.1301227110 10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.048 10.1177/0956797612438731 10.1177/001391659402600305 10.1177/1745691615583129 10.1006/cogp.1999.0728 10.1511/2006.59.247 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.11.005 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00491-3 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.013 10.1163/156856897X00366 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01403-5 10.1038/419359a 10.1016/j.autcon.2004.07.009 10.1016/j.coph.2008.12.014 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.11.001 10.1016/0162-3095(94)90018-3 10.1086/519146 10.1111/1467-9280.00106 10.1037/a0014835 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1978.tb00305.x 10.1080/00221309809595548 10.1177/0956797611419169 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.11.002 10.2190/KM50-WH2K-K2D1-DM69 10.1177/00333549111260S116 10.1088/0954-898X_14_3_302 10.1037/0033-295X.105.3.482 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv430 10.1163/156856897X00357 10.1163/156856807782753877 10.1016/j.visres.2015.03.018 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.12.003 10.1167/15.5.11 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01759.x 10.1167/15.14.12 10.1177/193758670800100306 10.1126/science.6143402 10.1080/13506280444000599 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208 10.2190/6V31-7M9R-T9L5-CDG9 10.1068/p5793 10.1098/rstb.1997.0103 10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390
ContentType	Journal Article
Copyright	2018 Elsevier B.V. Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Oct 2018
Copyright_xml	– notice: 2018 Elsevier B.V. – notice: Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. – notice: Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Oct 2018
DBID	AAYXX CITATION NPM 7TK 8BJ FQK JBE 7X8
DOI	10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009
DatabaseName	CrossRef PubMed Neurosciences Abstracts International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) International Bibliography of the Social Sciences International Bibliography of the Social Sciences MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle	CrossRef PubMed International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) Neurosciences Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList	International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) MEDLINE - Academic PubMed
Database_xml	– sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod	fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline	Architecture Psychology
EISSN	1873-7838
EndPage	131
ExternalDocumentID	29936343 10_1016_j_cognition_2018_06_009 S0010027718301616
Genre	Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article
GroupedDBID	--- --K --M --Z -DZ -~X .~1 0R~ 186 1B1 1RT 1~. 1~5 29F 3EH 4.4 41~ 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5VS 6J9 6PF 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JM 9JO AABNK AACTN AADFP AADPK AAEDT AAEDW AAFJI AAGJA AAGUQ AAIAV AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAWTL AAXLA AAXUO ABCQJ ABFNM ABFRF ABIVO ABJNI ABLJU ABMAC ABMMH ABOYX ABXDB ABYKQ ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACIUM ACKIV ACNCT ACPRK ACRLP ACXNI ADBBV ADEZE ADIYS AEBSH AEFWE AEKER AETEA AFFNX AFKWA AFTJW AFXIZ AFYLN AGHFR AGUBO AGWIK AGYEJ AHHHB AIEXJ AIKHN AITUG AJBFU AJOXV AKYCK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ AOMHK ASPBG AVARZ AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FD6 FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q G8K GBLVA HF~ HMQ HMW HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W K-O KOM LPU M2V M3V M41 MO0 MOBAO MVM N9A NHB O-L O9- OAUVE OHT OKEIE OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. PRBVW Q38 R2- RIG ROL RPZ SCC SDF SDG SDP SES SEW SNS SPCBC SPS SSB SSN SSO SSY SSZ T5K TN5 UBW UPT UQL WH7 WUQ XFK XIH XJT XKC XOL XPP YYP YZZ ZA5 ZKB ZMT ~G- 9DU AATTM AAXKI AAYWO AAYXX ABDPE ABUFD ACLOT ACVFH ADCNI ADMHG ADVLN AEIPS AEUPX AFJKZ AFPUW AIGII AIIUN AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ANKPU APXCP CITATION EFKBS ~HD NPM PKN 7TK 8BJ FQK JBE 7X8
ID	FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d0094ba2185b123647dc696871c501c3d1db130a87ad1f8f3a63f73666ec901f3
ISICitedReferencesCount	114
ISICitedReferencesURI	http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000442704800010&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN	0010-0277 1873-7838
IngestDate	Mon Sep 29 04:32:09 EDT 2025 Sun Nov 09 12:53:14 EST 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:35:58 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 06:55:17 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:16:22 EST 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:30:37 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed	true
IsScholarly	true
Keywords	Landscapes Aesthetics Artwork Architecture Faces Individual differences
Language	English
License	Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
LinkModel	OpenURL
MergedId	FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c447t-d0094ba2185b123647dc696871c501c3d1db130a87ad1f8f3a63f73666ec901f3
Notes	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23
PMID	29936343
PQID	2116624920
PQPubID	2038288
PageCount	11
ParticipantIDs	proquest_miscellaneous_2059040765 proquest_journals_2116624920 pubmed_primary_29936343 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cognition_2018_06_009 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_cognition_2018_06_009 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_cognition_2018_06_009
PublicationCentury	2000
PublicationDate	2018-10-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD	2018-10-01
PublicationDate_xml	– month: 10 year: 2018 text: 2018-10-01 day: 01
PublicationDecade	2010
PublicationPlace	Netherlands
PublicationPlace_xml	– name: Netherlands – name: Lausanne
PublicationTitle	Cognition
PublicationTitleAlternate	Cognition
PublicationYear	2018
Publisher	Elsevier B.V Elsevier Science Ltd
Publisher_xml	– name: Elsevier B.V – name: Elsevier Science Ltd
References	Oostendorp, Berlyne (b0195) 1978; 19 Biederman, Kalocsai (b0030) 1997; 352 Reber, Schwarz, Winkielman (b0210) 2004; 8 McCotter, Gosselin, Sowden, Schyns (b0150) 2005; 12 Rhodes (b0215) 2006; 57 Torralba, Oliva (b0275) 2003; 14 Germine, Russell, Bronstad, Blokland, Smoller, Kwok, Wilmer (b0080) 2015; 25 Aks, Sprott (b0010) 1996; 14 Gard, Gard, Kring, John (b0075) 2006; 40 Moore (b0170) 1981; 11 Berridge, Robinson, Aldridge (b0025) 2009; 9 Gangestad, Thornhill, Yeo (b0070) 1994; 15 Koelsch, Jäncke (b0125) 2015; 36 Largo-Wight, Chen, Dodd, Weiler (b0135) 2011; 126 Meyers-Levy, Zhu (b0165) 2007; 34 Amirshahi, Koch, Denzler, Redies (b0015) 2012 Rudd, Vohs, Aaker (b0230) 2012; 23 Schepman, Rodway, Pullen (b0240) 2015; 15 Shrout, Fleiss (b0255) 1979; 86 Kaplan, Kaplan (b0115) 1995 Kleiner, Brainard, Pelli, Broussard, Wolf, Niehorster (b0120) 2007; 36 Leather, Pyrgas, Beale, Lawrence (b0140) 1998; 30 Bar, Neta (b0020) 2006; 17 Bronstad, Russell (b0045) 2007; 36 Sevenant, Antrop (b0250) 2010; 27 Ulrich (b0280) 1984; 224 Spielberger, Gorsuch, Lushene (b0260) 1970 Langlois, Kalakanis, Rubenstein, Larson, Hallam, Smoot (b0130) 2000; 126 Pelli (b0200) 1997; 10 Vessel, E. A., Burakowski, L. M., Slone, L. K., Shuwairi, S. M., & Johnson, S. P., What we like before we know better: Infant preferences in the absence of semantics (unpublished results). Corey, Dunlap, Burke (b9000) 1998; 125 Oliva, Schyns (b0185) 2000; 41 Nasar (b0175) 1994; 26 Said, Todorov (b0235) 2011; 22 Vessel, Rubin (b0310) 2010; 10 Tinio, Leder (b0270) 2009; 3 Graham, Field (b0085) 2007; 21 Kaplan (b0110) 1992 Buijs, Elands, Langers (b0050) 2009; 91 Leder, Goller, Rigotti, Forster (b0145) 2016; 10 Schepman, Rodway, Pullen, Kirkham (b0245) 2015; 15 Vessel, Starr, Rubin (b0315) 2012; 6 Thornhill, Gangestad (b0265) 1999; 3 Brainard (b0040) 1997; 10 Herzog, Herbert, Kaplan, Crooks (b0100) 2000; 32 Rhodes, Sumich, Byatt (b0220) 1999; 10 Hönekopp (b0105) 2006; 32 Biederman, Vessel (b0035) 2006; 94 Oliva, Torralba (b0190) 2001; 42 Burton, Schweinberger, Jenkins, Kaufmann (b0055) 2015; 10 Graham, Schwarz, Chatterjee, Leder (b0090) 2016; 120 McCraty, Barrios-Choplin, Atkinson, Tomasino (b0155) 1998; 4 Xiao, Hays, Russell, Patterson, Ehinger, Torralba, Oliva (b0320) 2013; 4 Farah, Wilson, Drain, Tanaka (b0060) 1998; 105 Rolls (b0225) 1999 Menzel, Hayn-Leichsenring, Langner, Wiese, Redies (b0160) 2015; 10 Raanaas, Evensen, Rich, Sjøstrøm, Patil (b0205) 2011; 31 Van Tonder, Lyons, Ejima (b0295) 2002; 419 Franz, von der Heyde, Bülthoff (b0065) 2005; 14 Ulrich, Zimring, Zhu, DuBose, Seo, Choi, Joseph (b0285) 2008; 1 Vailaya, Jain, Zhang (b0290) 1998; 31 Zhang, Howell, Iyer (b0325) 2014; 38 Aharon, Etcoff, Ariely, Chabris, O’Connor, Breiter (b0005) 2001; 32 Vartanian, Navarrete, Chatterjee, Fich, Leder, Modroño, Skov (b0300) 2013; 110 Greene, Oliva (b0095) 2009; 58 Oliva, Park, Konkle (b0180) 2011 Ulrich (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0280) 1984; 224 Rhodes (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0215) 2006; 57 Greene (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0095) 2009; 58 Kaplan (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0115) 1995 Largo-Wight (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0135) 2011; 126 Leder (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0145) 2016; 10 Vessel (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0315) 2012; 6 Meyers-Levy (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0165) 2007; 34 Berridge (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0025) 2009; 9 Reber (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0210) 2004; 8 Xiao (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0320) 2013; 4 Biederman (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0035) 2006; 94 McCraty (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0155) 1998; 4 Moore (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0170) 1981; 11 Burton (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0055) 2015; 10 Gangestad (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0070) 1994; 15 Kleiner (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0120) 2007; 36 Franz (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0065) 2005; 14 Sevenant (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0250) 2010; 27 Aharon (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0005) 2001; 32 Bronstad (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0045) 2007; 36 Menzel (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0160) 2015; 10 Pelli (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0200) 1997; 10 Brainard (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0040) 1997; 10 Graham (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0085) 2007; 21 Schepman (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0245) 2015; 15 Farah (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0060) 1998; 105 Vartanian (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0300) 2013; 110 Langlois (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0130) 2000; 126 Germine (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0080) 2015; 25 Corey (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b9000) 1998; 125 Gard (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0075) 2006; 40 Nasar (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0175) 1994; 26 Tinio (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0270) 2009; 3 McCotter (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0150) 2005; 12 Oliva (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0185) 2000; 41 Biederman (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0030) 1997; 352 Thornhill (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0265) 1999; 3 Torralba (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0275) 2003; 14 Raanaas (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0205) 2011; 31 Graham (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0090) 2016; 120 Kaplan (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0110) 1992 Oliva (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0190) 2001; 42 Amirshahi (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0015) 2012 Oostendorp (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0195) 1978; 19 Van Tonder (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0295) 2002; 419 Buijs (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0050) 2009; 91 Vessel (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0310) 2010; 10 Hönekopp (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0105) 2006; 32 Herzog (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0100) 2000; 32 Vailaya (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0290) 1998; 31 Ulrich (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0285) 2008; 1 Rhodes (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0220) 1999; 10 Rolls (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0225) 1999 Oliva (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0180) 2011 Rudd (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0230) 2012; 23 Shrout (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0255) 1979; 86 Koelsch (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0125) 2015; 36 Schepman (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0240) 2015; 15 Spielberger (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0260) 1970 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0305 Aks (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0010) 1996; 14 Leather (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0140) 1998; 30 Said (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0235) 2011; 22 Zhang (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0325) 2014; 38 Bar (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0020) 2006; 17
References_xml	– year: 1999 ident: b0225 article-title: The brain and emotion – volume: 10 start-page: 1 year: 2016 end-page: 7 ident: b0145 article-title: Private and shared taste in art and face appreciation publication-title: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience – start-page: 1 year: 1970 end-page: 23 ident: b0260 article-title: The state-trait anxiety inventory publication-title: MANUAL – volume: 10 start-page: 1 year: 2015 end-page: 27 ident: b0160 article-title: Fourier power spectrum characteristics of face photographs: Attractiveness perception depends on low-level image properties publication-title: PLoS ONE – volume: 15 start-page: 73 year: 1994 end-page: 85 ident: b0070 article-title: Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry publication-title: Ethology and Sociobiology – volume: 126 start-page: 390 year: 2000 end-page: 423 ident: b0130 article-title: Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review publication-title: Psychological Bulletin – volume: 27 start-page: 827 year: 2010 end-page: 842 ident: b0250 article-title: The use of latent classes to identify individual differences in the importance of landscape dimensions for aesthetic preference publication-title: Land Use Policy – volume: 31 start-page: 1921 year: 1998 end-page: 1935 ident: b0290 article-title: On image classification: City images vs. landscapes publication-title: Pattern Recognition – volume: 224 start-page: 420 year: 1984 end-page: 421 ident: b0280 article-title: View through a window may influence recovery from surgery publication-title: Science – volume: 17 start-page: 645 year: 2006 end-page: 648 ident: b0020 article-title: Humans prefer curved visual objects publication-title: Psychological Science – volume: 21 start-page: 149 year: 2007 end-page: 164 ident: b0085 article-title: Statistical regularities of art images and natural scenes: Spectra, sparseness and nonlinearities publication-title: Spatial Vision – volume: 32 start-page: 537 year: 2001 end-page: 551 ident: b0005 article-title: Beautiful faces have variable reward value: fMRI and behavioral evidence publication-title: Neuron – volume: 105 start-page: 482 year: 1998 end-page: 498 ident: b0060 article-title: What is “special” about face perception? publication-title: Psychological Review – volume: 23 start-page: 1130 year: 2012 end-page: 1136 ident: b0230 article-title: Awe expands people’s perception of time, alters decision making, and enhances well-being publication-title: Psychological Science – volume: 15 start-page: 1 year: 2015 end-page: 10 ident: b0245 article-title: Shared liking and association valence for representational art but not abstract art publication-title: Journal of Vision – volume: 58 start-page: 137 year: 2009 end-page: 176 ident: b0095 article-title: Recognition of natural scenes from global properties: Seeing the forest without representing the trees publication-title: Cognitive Psychology – volume: 57 start-page: 199 year: 2006 end-page: 226 ident: b0215 article-title: The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty publication-title: Annual Review of Psychology – volume: 126 start-page: 124 year: 2011 end-page: 131 ident: b0135 article-title: Healthy workplaces: The effects of nature contact at work on employee stress and health publication-title: Public Health Reports – volume: 419 start-page: 359 year: 2002 end-page: 360 ident: b0295 article-title: Visual structure of a Japanese Zen garden publication-title: Nature – volume: 25 start-page: 2684 year: 2015 end-page: 2689 ident: b0080 article-title: Individual aesthetic preferences for faces are shaped mostly by environments, not genes publication-title: Current Biology – volume: 12 start-page: 938 year: 2005 end-page: 953 ident: b0150 article-title: The use of visual information in natural scenes publication-title: Visual Cognition – volume: 22 start-page: 1183 year: 2011 end-page: 1190 ident: b0235 article-title: A statistical model of facial attractiveness publication-title: Psychological Science – volume: 41 start-page: 176 year: 2000 end-page: 210 ident: b0185 article-title: Diagnostic colors mediate scene recognition publication-title: Cognitive Psychology – volume: 4 start-page: 75 year: 1998 end-page: 84 ident: b0155 article-title: The effects of different types of music on mood, tension, and mental clarity publication-title: Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine – volume: 19 start-page: 73 year: 1978 end-page: 82 ident: b0195 article-title: Dimensions in the perception of architecture: I. Identification and interpretation of dimensions of similarity publication-title: Scandinavian Journal of Psychology – volume: 4 start-page: 1 year: 2013 end-page: 10 ident: b0320 article-title: Basic level scene understanding: Categories, attributes and structures publication-title: Frontiers in Psychology – volume: 10 start-page: 482 year: 2015 end-page: 496 ident: b0055 article-title: Arguments against a configural processing account of familiar face recognition publication-title: Perspectives on Psychological Science – volume: 1 start-page: 61 year: 2008 end-page: 125 ident: b0285 article-title: A review of the research literature on evidence-based design publication-title: Health Environments Research and Design Journal – volume: 91 start-page: 113 year: 2009 end-page: 123 ident: b0050 article-title: No wilderness for immigrants: Cultural differences in images of nature and landscape preferences publication-title: Landscape and Urban Planning – volume: 125 start-page: 245 year: 1998 end-page: 261 ident: b9000 article-title: Averaging correlations: Expected values and bias in combined pearson rs and fisher’s z transformations publication-title: The Journal of General Psychology – volume: 11 start-page: 17 year: 1981 end-page: 34 ident: b0170 article-title: A prison environment’s effect on health care service demands publication-title: Journal of Environmental Systems – volume: 14 start-page: 1 year: 1996 end-page: 16 ident: b0010 article-title: Quantifying aesthetic preference for chaotic patterns publication-title: Empirical Studies of the Arts – volume: 15 start-page: 1 year: 2015 end-page: 6 ident: b0240 article-title: Greater cross-viewer similarity of semantic associations for representational than for abstract artworks publication-title: Journal of Vision – volume: 8 start-page: 364 year: 2004 end-page: 382 ident: b0210 article-title: Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? publication-title: Personality and Social Psychology Review – start-page: 8291 year: 2012 ident: b0015 article-title: PHOG analysis of self-similarity in aesthetic images publication-title: Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XVII – volume: 9 start-page: 65 year: 2009 end-page: 73 ident: b0025 article-title: Dissecting components of reward: “liking”, “wanting”, and learning publication-title: Current Opinion in Pharmacology – volume: 36 start-page: 1674 year: 2007 end-page: 1681 ident: b0045 article-title: Beauty is in the “we” of the beholder: Greater agreement on facial attractiveness among close relations publication-title: Perception – volume: 10 start-page: 437 year: 1997 end-page: 442 ident: b0200 article-title: The videotoolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies publication-title: Spatial Vision – volume: 32 start-page: 323 year: 2000 end-page: 346 ident: b0100 article-title: Cultural and developmental comparisons of landscape perceptions and preferences publication-title: Environment and Behavior – volume: 120 start-page: 11 year: 2016 end-page: 21 ident: b0090 article-title: Preference for luminance histogram regularities in natural scenes publication-title: Vision Research – volume: 26 start-page: 377 year: 1994 end-page: 401 ident: b0175 article-title: Urban design aesthetics: The evaluative qualities of building exteriors publication-title: Environment and Behavior – volume: 34 start-page: 174 year: 2007 end-page: 186 ident: b0165 article-title: The influence of ceiling height: The effect of priming on the type of processing that people use publication-title: Journal of Consumer Research – volume: 110 start-page: 10446 year: 2013 end-page: 10453 ident: b0300 article-title: Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture publication-title: PNAS – year: 1995 ident: b0115 article-title: The experience of nature: A psychological perspective – start-page: 581 year: 1992 end-page: 598 ident: b0110 article-title: Environmental preference in a knowledge-seeking, knowledge-using organism publication-title: The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture – reference: Vessel, E. A., Burakowski, L. M., Slone, L. K., Shuwairi, S. M., & Johnson, S. P., What we like before we know better: Infant preferences in the absence of semantics (unpublished results). – volume: 38 start-page: 55 year: 2014 end-page: 63 ident: b0325 article-title: Engagement with natural beauty moderates the positive relation between connectedness with nature and psychological well-being publication-title: Journal of Environmental Psychology – volume: 94 start-page: 247 year: 2006 end-page: 253 ident: b0035 article-title: Perceptual pleasure and the brain publication-title: American Scientist – volume: 32 start-page: 199 year: 2006 end-page: 209 ident: b0105 article-title: Once more: Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness publication-title: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance – volume: 14 start-page: 165 year: 2005 end-page: 172 ident: b0065 article-title: An empirical approach to the experience of architectural space in virtual reality—exploring relations between features and affective appraisals of rectangular indoor spaces publication-title: Automation in Construction – volume: 10 start-page: 1 year: 2010 end-page: 14 ident: b0310 article-title: Beauty and the beholder: Highly individual taste for abstract, but not real-world images publication-title: Journal of Vision – volume: 10 start-page: 52 year: 1999 end-page: 58 ident: b0220 article-title: Are average facial configurations attractive only because of their symmetry? publication-title: Psychological Science – volume: 36 start-page: 3043 year: 2015 end-page: 3049 ident: b0125 article-title: Music and the heart publication-title: European Heart Journal – volume: 3 start-page: 52 year: 2009 end-page: 56 ident: b0270 article-title: Natural scenes are indeed preferred, but image quality might have the last word publication-title: Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts – volume: 352 year: 1997 ident: b0030 article-title: Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition publication-title: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences – volume: 86 start-page: 420 year: 1979 end-page: 428 ident: b0255 article-title: Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability publication-title: Psychological Bulletin – volume: 36 start-page: S14 year: 2007 ident: b0120 article-title: What’s new in Psychtoolbox-3? publication-title: Perception – volume: 6 start-page: 1 year: 2012 end-page: 17 ident: b0315 article-title: The brain on art: Intense aesthetic experience activates the default mode network publication-title: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience – volume: 10 start-page: 443 year: 1997 end-page: 446 ident: b0040 article-title: The psychophysics toolbox publication-title: Spatial Vision – volume: 42 start-page: 145 year: 2001 end-page: 175 ident: b0190 article-title: Modeling the shape of the scene: A holistic representation of the spatial envelope publication-title: International Journal of Computer Vision – volume: 31 start-page: 99 year: 2011 end-page: 105 ident: b0205 article-title: Benefits of indoor plants on attention capacity in an office setting publication-title: Journal of Environmental Psychology – start-page: 308 year: 2011 end-page: 340 ident: b0180 article-title: Remembering the shape of visual space publication-title: Vision in 3D environments – volume: 40 start-page: 1086 year: 2006 end-page: 1102 ident: b0075 article-title: Anticipatory and consummatory components of the experience of pleasure: A scale development study publication-title: Journal of Research in Personality – volume: 30 start-page: 739 year: 1998 end-page: 762 ident: b0140 article-title: Windows in the workplace: Sunlight, view, and occupational stress publication-title: Environment and Behavior – volume: 3 start-page: 452 year: 1999 end-page: 460 ident: b0265 article-title: Facial attractiveness publication-title: Trends in Cognitive Sciences – volume: 14 start-page: 391 year: 2003 end-page: 412 ident: b0275 article-title: Statistics of natural image categories publication-title: Network – volume: 31 start-page: 1921 issue: 12 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0290 article-title: On image classification: City images vs. landscapes publication-title: Pattern Recognition doi: 10.1016/S0031-3203(98)00079-X – volume: 10 start-page: 1 issue: 2 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0310 article-title: Beauty and the beholder: Highly individual taste for abstract, but not real-world images publication-title: Journal of Vision doi: 10.1167/10.2.18 – volume: 32 start-page: 323 issue: 3 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0100 article-title: Cultural and developmental comparisons of landscape perceptions and preferences publication-title: Environment and Behavior doi: 10.1177/0013916500323002 – volume: 10 start-page: 1 issue: 4 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0160 article-title: Fourier power spectrum characteristics of face photographs: Attractiveness perception depends on low-level image properties publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122801 – volume: 86 start-page: 420 issue: 2 year: 1979 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0255 article-title: Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability publication-title: Psychological Bulletin doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 – volume: 4 start-page: 75 issue: 1 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0155 article-title: The effects of different types of music on mood, tension, and mental clarity publication-title: Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine – volume: 10 start-page: 1 issue: April year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0145 article-title: Private and shared taste in art and face appreciation publication-title: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience – volume: 30 start-page: 739 issue: 6 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0140 article-title: Windows in the workplace: Sunlight, view, and occupational stress publication-title: Environment and Behavior doi: 10.1177/001391659803000601 – volume: 42 start-page: 145 issue: 3 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0190 article-title: Modeling the shape of the scene: A holistic representation of the spatial envelope publication-title: International Journal of Computer Vision doi: 10.1023/A:1011139631724 – volume: 58 start-page: 137 issue: 2 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0095 article-title: Recognition of natural scenes from global properties: Seeing the forest without representing the trees publication-title: Cognitive Psychology doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.06.001 – volume: 110 start-page: 10446 issue: Suppl. 2 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0300 article-title: Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture publication-title: PNAS doi: 10.1073/pnas.1301227110 – volume: 25 start-page: 2684 issue: 20 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0080 article-title: Individual aesthetic preferences for faces are shaped mostly by environments, not genes publication-title: Current Biology doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.048 – volume: 23 start-page: 1130 issue: 10 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0230 article-title: Awe expands people’s perception of time, alters decision making, and enhances well-being publication-title: Psychological Science doi: 10.1177/0956797612438731 – volume: 26 start-page: 377 issue: 3 year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0175 article-title: Urban design aesthetics: The evaluative qualities of building exteriors publication-title: Environment and Behavior doi: 10.1177/001391659402600305 – start-page: 308 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0180 article-title: Remembering the shape of visual space – volume: 10 start-page: 482 issue: 4 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0055 article-title: Arguments against a configural processing account of familiar face recognition publication-title: Perspectives on Psychological Science doi: 10.1177/1745691615583129 – volume: 41 start-page: 176 issue: 2 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0185 article-title: Diagnostic colors mediate scene recognition publication-title: Cognitive Psychology doi: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0728 – volume: 94 start-page: 247 issue: 3 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0035 article-title: Perceptual pleasure and the brain publication-title: American Scientist doi: 10.1511/2006.59.247 – volume: 31 start-page: 99 issue: 1 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0205 article-title: Benefits of indoor plants on attention capacity in an office setting publication-title: Journal of Environmental Psychology doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.11.005 – year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0225 – volume: 32 start-page: 537 issue: 3 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0005 article-title: Beautiful faces have variable reward value: fMRI and behavioral evidence publication-title: Neuron doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00491-3 – volume: 38 start-page: 55 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0325 article-title: Engagement with natural beauty moderates the positive relation between connectedness with nature and psychological well-being publication-title: Journal of Environmental Psychology doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.013 – volume: 10 start-page: 437 year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0200 article-title: The videotoolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies publication-title: Spatial Vision doi: 10.1163/156856897X00366 – start-page: 1 year: 1970 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0260 article-title: The state-trait anxiety inventory publication-title: MANUAL – volume: 8 start-page: 364 issue: 4 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0210 article-title: Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? publication-title: Personality and Social Psychology Review doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3 – volume: 4 start-page: 1 issue: August year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0320 article-title: Basic level scene understanding: Categories, attributes and structures publication-title: Frontiers in Psychology – volume: 3 start-page: 452 issue: 12 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0265 article-title: Facial attractiveness publication-title: Trends in Cognitive Sciences doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01403-5 – start-page: 581 year: 1992 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0110 article-title: Environmental preference in a knowledge-seeking, knowledge-using organism – volume: 419 start-page: 359 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0295 article-title: Visual structure of a Japanese Zen garden publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/419359a – volume: 14 start-page: 165 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0065 article-title: An empirical approach to the experience of architectural space in virtual reality—exploring relations between features and affective appraisals of rectangular indoor spaces publication-title: Automation in Construction doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2004.07.009 – volume: 9 start-page: 65 issue: 1 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0025 article-title: Dissecting components of reward: “liking”, “wanting”, and learning publication-title: Current Opinion in Pharmacology doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2008.12.014 – volume: 40 start-page: 1086 issue: 6 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0075 article-title: Anticipatory and consummatory components of the experience of pleasure: A scale development study publication-title: Journal of Research in Personality doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.11.001 – volume: 6 start-page: 1 issue: 66 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0315 article-title: The brain on art: Intense aesthetic experience activates the default mode network publication-title: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience – volume: 15 start-page: 73 issue: 2 year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0070 article-title: Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry publication-title: Ethology and Sociobiology doi: 10.1016/0162-3095(94)90018-3 – volume: 34 start-page: 174 issue: 2 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0165 article-title: The influence of ceiling height: The effect of priming on the type of processing that people use publication-title: Journal of Consumer Research doi: 10.1086/519146 – volume: 10 start-page: 52 issue: 1 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0220 article-title: Are average facial configurations attractive only because of their symmetry? publication-title: Psychological Science doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00106 – volume: 3 start-page: 52 issue: 1 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0270 article-title: Natural scenes are indeed preferred, but image quality might have the last word publication-title: Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts doi: 10.1037/a0014835 – volume: 19 start-page: 73 issue: 1 year: 1978 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0195 article-title: Dimensions in the perception of architecture: I. Identification and interpretation of dimensions of similarity publication-title: Scandinavian Journal of Psychology doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1978.tb00305.x – volume: 125 start-page: 245 issue: 3 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b9000 article-title: Averaging correlations: Expected values and bias in combined pearson rs and fisher’s z transformations publication-title: The Journal of General Psychology doi: 10.1080/00221309809595548 – volume: 22 start-page: 1183 issue: 9 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0235 article-title: A statistical model of facial attractiveness publication-title: Psychological Science doi: 10.1177/0956797611419169 – volume: 27 start-page: 827 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0250 article-title: The use of latent classes to identify individual differences in the importance of landscape dimensions for aesthetic preference publication-title: Land Use Policy doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.11.002 – volume: 11 start-page: 17 issue: 1 year: 1981 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0170 article-title: A prison environment’s effect on health care service demands publication-title: Journal of Environmental Systems doi: 10.2190/KM50-WH2K-K2D1-DM69 – volume: 126 start-page: 124 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0135 article-title: Healthy workplaces: The effects of nature contact at work on employee stress and health publication-title: Public Health Reports doi: 10.1177/00333549111260S116 – volume: 14 start-page: 391 issue: 3 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0275 article-title: Statistics of natural image categories publication-title: Network doi: 10.1088/0954-898X_14_3_302 – volume: 105 start-page: 482 issue: 3 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0060 article-title: What is “special” about face perception? publication-title: Psychological Review doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.105.3.482 – ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0305 – volume: 36 start-page: 3043 issue: 44 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0125 article-title: Music and the heart publication-title: European Heart Journal doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv430 – volume: 10 start-page: 443 year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0040 article-title: The psychophysics toolbox publication-title: Spatial Vision doi: 10.1163/156856897X00357 – volume: 21 start-page: 149 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0085 article-title: Statistical regularities of art images and natural scenes: Spectra, sparseness and nonlinearities publication-title: Spatial Vision doi: 10.1163/156856807782753877 – volume: 36 start-page: S14 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0120 article-title: What’s new in Psychtoolbox-3? publication-title: Perception – volume: 120 start-page: 11 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0090 article-title: Preference for luminance histogram regularities in natural scenes publication-title: Vision Research doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.03.018 – volume: 91 start-page: 113 issue: 3 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0050 article-title: No wilderness for immigrants: Cultural differences in images of nature and landscape preferences publication-title: Landscape and Urban Planning doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.12.003 – volume: 15 start-page: 1 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0245 article-title: Shared liking and association valence for representational art but not abstract art publication-title: Journal of Vision doi: 10.1167/15.5.11 – volume: 17 start-page: 645 issue: 8 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0020 article-title: Humans prefer curved visual objects publication-title: Psychological Science doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01759.x – volume: 15 start-page: 1 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0240 article-title: Greater cross-viewer similarity of semantic associations for representational than for abstract artworks publication-title: Journal of Vision doi: 10.1167/15.14.12 – volume: 1 start-page: 61 issue: 3 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0285 article-title: A review of the research literature on evidence-based design publication-title: Health Environments Research and Design Journal doi: 10.1177/193758670800100306 – volume: 224 start-page: 420 issue: 4647 year: 1984 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0280 article-title: View through a window may influence recovery from surgery publication-title: Science doi: 10.1126/science.6143402 – start-page: 8291 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0015 article-title: PHOG analysis of self-similarity in aesthetic images publication-title: Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XVII – volume: 12 start-page: 938 issue: 6 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0150 article-title: The use of visual information in natural scenes publication-title: Visual Cognition doi: 10.1080/13506280444000599 – volume: 57 start-page: 199 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0215 article-title: The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty publication-title: Annual Review of Psychology doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208 – volume: 14 start-page: 1 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0010 article-title: Quantifying aesthetic preference for chaotic patterns publication-title: Empirical Studies of the Arts doi: 10.2190/6V31-7M9R-T9L5-CDG9 – volume: 36 start-page: 1674 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0045 article-title: Beauty is in the “we” of the beholder: Greater agreement on facial attractiveness among close relations publication-title: Perception doi: 10.1068/p5793 – volume: 352 issue: 1358 year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0030 article-title: Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition publication-title: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences doi: 10.1098/rstb.1997.0103 – volume: 32 start-page: 199 issue: 2 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0105 article-title: Once more: Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness publication-title: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance – year: 1995 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0115 – volume: 126 start-page: 390 issue: 3 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009_b0130 article-title: Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review publication-title: Psychological Bulletin doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390
SSID	ssj0004278
Score	2.595874
Snippet	•Aesthetic judgments of faces and natural landscapes show high “shared taste.”•Aesthetic judgments of paintings and architecture vary more across... Individuals can be aesthetically engaged by a diverse array of visual experiences (paintings, mountain vistas, etc.), yet the processes that support this...
SourceID	proquest pubmed crossref elsevier
SourceType	Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher
StartPage	121
SubjectTerms	Aesthetics Agreements Architecture Artwork Between-subjects design Cultural differences Culture Faces Imagery Individual differences Information processing Information sources Landscape Landscapes Organizational culture Reliability Society Taste Visual experiences
Title	Stronger shared taste for natural aesthetic domains than for artifacts of human culture
URI	https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29936343 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2116624920 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2059040765
Volume	179
WOSCitedRecordID	wos000442704800010&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText	1
inHoldings	1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights	– providerCode: PRVESC databaseName: ScienceDirect Freedom Collection - Elsevier customDbUrl: eissn: 1873-7838 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0004278 issn: 0010-0277 databaseCode: AIEXJ dateStart: 19950101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com providerName: Elsevier
link	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9MwELe6jYcJCcGAURiTkXirUsVxYie8VTA2eKiQNqBvUWI72qaSTv2Yxn_Bn8yd7bhMYxoI8RJV-arr-_XufP7dHSGv46xJWC15xA1TUSozExV5JXD3sTJpLcBjiG2zCTke55NJ8anX-9HlwlxOZdvmV1fFxX8VNZwDYWPq7F-IO7wUTsBnEDocQexw_CPBH2NwG3N5F6eWXL6sQJCWTWiLeGJtALAEp5i8ONCzbxVyZDB-7viU8D7MdbAED9e_z9XmuF7SwHGO1jv4X7ACuQ0muybQg9FwHepe-Y7ZY4wUnQUz8M60ntERkmwGR-ExcILn9uLhcHBY1bCgn_qf6UMULA9kNx83u5E743Qx3pX4Ji7Gqd8cUCNzV-8l6GfXbcZrWOYSqr2xZs6E3LADLiRxPlTdfCCJz1VqjYu16QuExGMcDQ4GNBw6wWKDbCUyK0BPbo0-HEw-rnNtk866u9Ff4wz-9utu83huW9FYz-bkIXnglyR05KD0iPRMu0Puj37ZYdoh28FQfn9MvnYQow5i1EKMAn6ohxgNEKMeYhQhZm8JEKOzhlqIUQ-xJ-Tz-4OTt0eRb9ARqTSVy0gjL7WuwEvMamY7EWiFxZYkU1nMFNdM1-AjVbmsNGvyhleCN5LDitko8EMb_pRstrPWPCNUxnHdaFw-KG236musLSl0oXVqWCH7RHSTWCpfvR6bqEzLjqZ4XobZL3H2S0vYLPokDg9euAIudz_yppNS6f1Q51-WAK-7H97r5Fp6rbAoE8aEwNqccZ-8CpdBkePuXNWa2QruwTTwNJYi65Ndh4cwYPAZueApf_4vI3tBttd_zj2yuZyvzEtyT10uzxbzfbIhJ_m-R_tPcz7Qfw
linkProvider	Elsevier
openUrl	ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stronger+shared+taste+for+natural+aesthetic+domains+than+for+artifacts+of+human+culture&rft.jtitle=Cognition&rft.au=Vessel%2C+Edward+A.&rft.au=Maurer%2C+Natalia&rft.au=Denker%2C+Alexander+H.&rft.au=Starr%2C+G.+Gabrielle&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+B.V&rft.issn=0010-0277&rft.eissn=1873-7838&rft.volume=179&rft.spage=121&rft.epage=131&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.cognition.2018.06.009&rft.externalDocID=S0010027718301616
thumbnail_l	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0010-0277&client=summon
thumbnail_m	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0010-0277&client=summon
thumbnail_s	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0010-0277&client=summon