A Qualitative Analysis on the Effectiveness of Peer Feedback in Team-Based Learning

Introduction There is limited information on medical students’ perceptions of peer feedback in team-based learning (TBL), both in terms of its value and how it has affected them as they move forward in their careers. The primary goals of this study were to examine students’ perceptions about their p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medical science educator Vol. 33; no. 4; pp. 893 - 902
Main Authors: Lerchenfeldt, Sarah, Kamel-ElSayed, Suzan, Patino, Gustavo, Loftus, Stephen, Thomas, David M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York Springer US 01.08.2023
Subjects:
ISSN:2156-8650, 2156-8650
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Introduction There is limited information on medical students’ perceptions of peer feedback in team-based learning (TBL), both in terms of its value and how it has affected them as they move forward in their careers. The primary goals of this study were to examine students’ perceptions about their peer feedback experiences throughout medical school and into residency and to identify areas for improvement to develop a more valuable experience. Materials and Methods This study utilized exploratory qualitative research. A total of six focus group sessions were conducted, in which each group consisted of medical students or residents. All participants were asked for their thoughts about peer feedback using semi-structured interviews. The sessions were transcribed and thematic analysis of student responses was completed by independent reviewers. Results A total of 11 first-year, 12 second-year, 12 rising third-year, and 10 rising fourth-year medical students participated in the focus groups. In addition, three graduates participated in the study. Overall, four key themes were identified regarding the peer feedback experience. These included (1) preparation and training, (2) procedure and implementation, (3) evaluation of student feedback, and (4) student considerations. Discussion The participants indicated that the idea of providing and receiving effective peer feedback throughout the medical school curriculum was a valuable experience. This analysis raised awareness about several potential areas of difficulty for students in regard to the peer feedback process used in TBL. Quality improvement initiatives may include educating students about the use of constructive feedback, adding self-reflection, or using oral instead of written feedback.
AbstractList There is limited information on medical students' perceptions of peer feedback in team-based learning (TBL), both in terms of its value and how it has affected them as they move forward in their careers. The primary goals of this study were to examine students' perceptions about their peer feedback experiences throughout medical school and into residency and to identify areas for improvement to develop a more valuable experience. This study utilized exploratory qualitative research. A total of six focus group sessions were conducted, in which each group consisted of medical students or residents. All participants were asked for their thoughts about peer feedback using semi-structured interviews. The sessions were transcribed and thematic analysis of student responses was completed by independent reviewers. A total of 11 first-year, 12 second-year, 12 rising third-year, and 10 rising fourth-year medical students participated in the focus groups. In addition, three graduates participated in the study. Overall, four key themes were identified regarding the peer feedback experience. These included (1) preparation and training, (2) procedure and implementation, (3) evaluation of student feedback, and (4) student considerations. The participants indicated that the idea of providing and receiving effective peer feedback throughout the medical school curriculum was a valuable experience. This analysis raised awareness about several potential areas of difficulty for students in regard to the peer feedback process used in TBL. Quality improvement initiatives may include educating students about the use of constructive feedback, adding self-reflection, or using oral instead of written feedback.
There is limited information on medical students' perceptions of peer feedback in team-based learning (TBL), both in terms of its value and how it has affected them as they move forward in their careers. The primary goals of this study were to examine students' perceptions about their peer feedback experiences throughout medical school and into residency and to identify areas for improvement to develop a more valuable experience.IntroductionThere is limited information on medical students' perceptions of peer feedback in team-based learning (TBL), both in terms of its value and how it has affected them as they move forward in their careers. The primary goals of this study were to examine students' perceptions about their peer feedback experiences throughout medical school and into residency and to identify areas for improvement to develop a more valuable experience.This study utilized exploratory qualitative research. A total of six focus group sessions were conducted, in which each group consisted of medical students or residents. All participants were asked for their thoughts about peer feedback using semi-structured interviews. The sessions were transcribed and thematic analysis of student responses was completed by independent reviewers.Materials and MethodsThis study utilized exploratory qualitative research. A total of six focus group sessions were conducted, in which each group consisted of medical students or residents. All participants were asked for their thoughts about peer feedback using semi-structured interviews. The sessions were transcribed and thematic analysis of student responses was completed by independent reviewers.A total of 11 first-year, 12 second-year, 12 rising third-year, and 10 rising fourth-year medical students participated in the focus groups. In addition, three graduates participated in the study. Overall, four key themes were identified regarding the peer feedback experience. These included (1) preparation and training, (2) procedure and implementation, (3) evaluation of student feedback, and (4) student considerations.ResultsA total of 11 first-year, 12 second-year, 12 rising third-year, and 10 rising fourth-year medical students participated in the focus groups. In addition, three graduates participated in the study. Overall, four key themes were identified regarding the peer feedback experience. These included (1) preparation and training, (2) procedure and implementation, (3) evaluation of student feedback, and (4) student considerations.The participants indicated that the idea of providing and receiving effective peer feedback throughout the medical school curriculum was a valuable experience. This analysis raised awareness about several potential areas of difficulty for students in regard to the peer feedback process used in TBL. Quality improvement initiatives may include educating students about the use of constructive feedback, adding self-reflection, or using oral instead of written feedback.DiscussionThe participants indicated that the idea of providing and receiving effective peer feedback throughout the medical school curriculum was a valuable experience. This analysis raised awareness about several potential areas of difficulty for students in regard to the peer feedback process used in TBL. Quality improvement initiatives may include educating students about the use of constructive feedback, adding self-reflection, or using oral instead of written feedback.
Introduction There is limited information on medical students’ perceptions of peer feedback in team-based learning (TBL), both in terms of its value and how it has affected them as they move forward in their careers. The primary goals of this study were to examine students’ perceptions about their peer feedback experiences throughout medical school and into residency and to identify areas for improvement to develop a more valuable experience. Materials and Methods This study utilized exploratory qualitative research. A total of six focus group sessions were conducted, in which each group consisted of medical students or residents. All participants were asked for their thoughts about peer feedback using semi-structured interviews. The sessions were transcribed and thematic analysis of student responses was completed by independent reviewers. Results A total of 11 first-year, 12 second-year, 12 rising third-year, and 10 rising fourth-year medical students participated in the focus groups. In addition, three graduates participated in the study. Overall, four key themes were identified regarding the peer feedback experience. These included (1) preparation and training, (2) procedure and implementation, (3) evaluation of student feedback, and (4) student considerations. Discussion The participants indicated that the idea of providing and receiving effective peer feedback throughout the medical school curriculum was a valuable experience. This analysis raised awareness about several potential areas of difficulty for students in regard to the peer feedback process used in TBL. Quality improvement initiatives may include educating students about the use of constructive feedback, adding self-reflection, or using oral instead of written feedback.
Author Patino, Gustavo
Loftus, Stephen
Kamel-ElSayed, Suzan
Lerchenfeldt, Sarah
Thomas, David M.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Sarah
  orcidid: 0000-0002-1383-4456
  surname: Lerchenfeldt
  fullname: Lerchenfeldt, Sarah
  email: lerchenfeldt@oakland.edu
  organization: Department of Foundational Medical Studies, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Suzan
  orcidid: 0000-0002-5534-5685
  surname: Kamel-ElSayed
  fullname: Kamel-ElSayed, Suzan
  organization: Department of Foundational Medical Studies, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Gustavo
  orcidid: 0000-0003-1866-5572
  surname: Patino
  fullname: Patino, Gustavo
  organization: Department of Medical Education, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker MD School of Medicine
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Stephen
  orcidid: 0000-0003-3059-6813
  surname: Loftus
  fullname: Loftus, Stephen
  organization: Department of Foundational Medical Studies, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine
– sequence: 5
  givenname: David M.
  orcidid: 0000-0002-9845-5892
  surname: Thomas
  fullname: Thomas, David M.
  organization: Department of Foundational Medical Studies, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37546199$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kU9PHSEUxUljU__UL9BFw7KbURiYYWbVvBptm7ykNdo1uQOXJ3YeWJgx0U9fnk-N7UI2EO75nZPcs092QgxIyAfOjjhj6jhL1ipWsVpUjHdcVPdvyF7Nm7bq2obtvHjvksOcr1k5jey4ZO_IrlCNbHnf75GLBT2fYfQTTP4W6SLAeJd9pjHQ6QrpqXNoNpOAuXw6-hMx0TNEO4D5TX2glwjr6gtktHSJkIIPq_fkrYMx4-HjfUB-nZ1ennyrlj--fj9ZLCsjpZqq2gjXqGYYpEIn6wF744CD62VjG9MrcHVrLXI7iJqBlL2xRgC3nVQSjRrEAfm89b2ZhzVag2FKMOqb5NeQ7nQEr_-dBH-lV_FWcyaZkEoUh0-PDin-mTFPeu2zwXGEgHHOui5ZQgohuiL9-DLsOeVplUXQbQUmxZwTOm0etho32X4soXpTnN4Wp0tx-qE4fV_Q-j_0yf1VSGyhXMRhhUlfxzmV_vJr1F90V6x8
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s40670_023_01844_6
crossref_primary_10_1155_2024_1271802
Cites_doi 10.1080/0260293970220402
10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.019
10.1080/03075079912331379935
10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
10.3402/meo.v19.25141
10.3109/0142159X.2012.651179
10.1080/713611428
10.1002/tl.334
10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00049.x
10.3109/0142159X.2012.687120
10.1186/s12909-021-02821-6
10.1097/NNE.0000000000000227
10.1641/00063568(2002)052[0824:PRITC]2.0.CO;2
10.1080/07294360.2020.1798889
10.2147/AMEP.S250761
10.5858/arpa.2018-0058-RA
10.1186/s12909-019-1755-z
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2023
The Author(s) 2023.
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2023
– notice: The Author(s) 2023.
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1007/s40670-023-01813-z
DatabaseName Springer Nature OA Free Journals
CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Education
EISSN 2156-8650
EndPage 902
ExternalDocumentID PMC10403473
37546199
10_1007_s40670_023_01813_z
Genre Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Team Based Learning Collaborative (TBLC)
– fundername: ;
GroupedDBID -EM
0R~
203
406
96X
AAAVM
AACDK
AAHNG
AAIAL
AAJBT
AAJKR
AANZL
AARTL
AASML
AATNV
AATVU
AAUYE
AAWCG
AAYIU
AAYQN
AAYTO
AAZMS
ABAKF
ABDZT
ABECU
ABFTV
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABKCH
ABMQK
ABQBU
ABTEG
ABTKH
ABTMW
ABXPI
ACAOD
ACDTI
ACGFS
ACHSB
ACKNC
ACMLO
ACOKC
ACPIV
ACZOJ
ADHHG
ADINQ
ADKNI
ADKPE
ADURQ
ADYFF
ADZKW
AEBTG
AEFQL
AEGNC
AEJHL
AEJRE
AEMSY
AEOHA
AEPYU
AESKC
AETCA
AEVLU
AEXYK
AFBBN
AFQWF
AFZKB
AGAYW
AGDGC
AGMZJ
AGQEE
AGQMX
AGRTI
AGWZB
AGYKE
AHAVH
AHBYD
AHSBF
AIAKS
AIGIU
AILAN
AITGF
AJBLW
AJRNO
AJZVZ
AKLTO
ALFXC
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMXSW
AMYLF
AMYQR
ASPBG
AUKKA
AVXWI
AXYYD
AYQZM
BGNMA
C6C
CSCUP
DNIVK
DPUIP
EBLON
EBS
EIOEI
EJD
ESBYG
FERAY
FIGPU
FINBP
FNLPD
FRRFC
FSGXE
FYJPI
GGCAI
GGRSB
GJIRD
HRMNR
IKXTQ
ITM
IWAJR
J-C
JBSCW
JZLTJ
KOV
LLZTM
M4Y
NPVJJ
NQJWS
NU0
O9J
OK1
PT4
RLLFE
ROL
RPM
RSV
SHX
SISQX
SJYHP
SNE
SNPRN
SNX
SOHCF
SOJ
SPISZ
SRMVM
SSLCW
STPWE
TSG
UG4
UOJIU
UTJUX
UZXMN
VFIZW
W48
ZMTXR
AAYXX
ABBRH
ABDBE
ABFSG
ABRTQ
ACSTC
AEZWR
AFDZB
AFHIU
AFOHR
AHPBZ
AHWEU
AIXLP
ATHPR
AYFIA
CITATION
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-2c3f575bb47ef42be9cfa1af945d5c97af26dde1db320a449cdc3a1d8474ec7b3
IEDL.DBID RSV
ISICitedReferencesCount 7
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001015486700003&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 2156-8650
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:41:58 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 13:28:40 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:22:59 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 02:30:00 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 21:38:42 EST 2025
Fri Feb 21 02:42:28 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Keywords Peer assessment
Medical education
Peer feedback
Team-based learning (TBL)
Language English
License The Author(s) 2023.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c447t-2c3f575bb47ef42be9cfa1af945d5c97af26dde1db320a449cdc3a1d8474ec7b3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-9845-5892
0000-0003-1866-5572
0000-0002-5534-5685
0000-0003-3059-6813
0000-0002-1383-4456
OpenAccessLink https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40670-023-01813-z
PMID 37546199
PQID 2847343338
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10403473
proquest_miscellaneous_2847343338
pubmed_primary_37546199
crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s40670_023_01813_z
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40670_023_01813_z
springer_journals_10_1007_s40670_023_01813_z
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-08-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-08-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace New York
PublicationPlace_xml – name: New York
– name: United States
PublicationTitle Medical science educator
PublicationTitleAbbrev Med.Sci.Educ
PublicationTitleAlternate Med Sci Educ
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher Springer US
Publisher_xml – name: Springer US
References Cestone, Levine, Lane (CR5) 2008; 116
Vygotsky, Cole (CR12) 1978
Lerchenfeldt, Taylor (CR15) 2020; 11
Braun, Clarke (CR14) 2006; 3
Gielen, De Wever (CR19) 2015; 1
Elnicki, Layne, Ogden, Morris (CR21) 1998; 13
Altmiller (CR18) 2016; 41
Van Buren (CR11) 2016
Topping, Smith, Swanson, Elliot (CR9) 2000; 25
Schillings, Roebertsen, Savelberg, van Dijk, Dolmans (CR20) 2021; 40
Kaufman, Swanwick, Forrest, O’Brien (CR3) 2019
Jug, Jiang, Bean (CR17) 2019; 143
Mohanna, Chambers, Cottrell, Wall (CR2) 2011
Dochy, Segers, Sluijsmans (CR8) 1999; 24
Burgess, Roberts, Lane, Haq, Clark, Kalman (CR13) 2021; 21
Levine, Michaelsen, Parmalee, McMahon, Levine (CR10) 2008
Hrynchak, Batty (CR1) 2012; 34
Lerchenfeldt, Mi, Eng (CR22) 2019; 19
Searby, Ewers (CR6) 1997; 22
Liu, Pysarchik, Taylor (CR7) 2002; 52
Parmelee, Michaelsen, Cook, Hudes (CR4) 2012; 34
Algiraigri (CR16) 2014; 19
J Liu (1813_CR7) 2002; 52
RE Levine (1813_CR10) 2008
M Gielen (1813_CR19) 2015; 1
M Schillings (1813_CR20) 2021; 40
S Lerchenfeldt (1813_CR22) 2019; 19
S Lerchenfeldt (1813_CR15) 2020; 11
G Altmiller (1813_CR18) 2016; 41
DM Kaufman (1813_CR3) 2019
DM Elnicki (1813_CR21) 1998; 13
A Burgess (1813_CR13) 2021; 21
M Van Buren (1813_CR11) 2016
Adult learning and self-directed learners (1813_CR2) 2011
LS Vygotsky (1813_CR12) 1978
D Parmelee (1813_CR4) 2012; 34
KJ Topping (1813_CR9) 2000; 25
M Searby (1813_CR6) 1997; 22
AH Algiraigri (1813_CR16) 2014; 19
V Braun (1813_CR14) 2006; 3
F Dochy (1813_CR8) 1999; 24
CM Cestone (1813_CR5) 2008; 116
R Jug (1813_CR17) 2019; 143
P Hrynchak (1813_CR1) 2012; 34
References_xml – volume: 22
  start-page: 371
  issue: 4
  year: 1997
  end-page: 383
  ident: CR6
  article-title: An evaluation of the use of peer assessment in higher education: a case study in the School of Music, Kingston University
  publication-title: Assess Eval High Educ
  doi: 10.1080/0260293970220402
– volume: 1
  start-page: 315
  issue: 52
  year: 2015
  end-page: 325
  ident: CR19
  article-title: Structuring peer assessment: comparing the impact of the degree of structure on peer feedback content
  publication-title: Comput Hum Behav
  doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.019
– volume: 24
  start-page: 331
  issue: 3
  year: 1999
  end-page: 350
  ident: CR8
  article-title: The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: a review
  publication-title: Stud High Educ
  doi: 10.1080/03075079912331379935
– volume: 3
  start-page: 77
  issue: 2
  year: 2006
  end-page: 101
  ident: CR14
  article-title: Using thematic analysis in psychology
  publication-title: Qual Res Psychol
  doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
– volume: 19
  start-page: 25141
  year: 2014
  ident: CR16
  article-title: Ten tips for receiving feedback effectively in clinical practice
  publication-title: Med Educ Online
  doi: 10.3402/meo.v19.25141
– volume: 34
  start-page: e275
  issue: 5
  year: 2012
  end-page: e287
  ident: CR4
  article-title: Team-based learning: a practical guide: AMEE guide no. 65
  publication-title: Med Teach
  doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.651179
– volume: 25
  start-page: 149
  issue: 2
  year: 2000
  end-page: 169
  ident: CR9
  article-title: Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students
  publication-title: Assess Eval High Educ
  doi: 10.1080/713611428
– year: 2016
  ident: CR11
  publication-title: Phenomenology of practice: meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing
– volume: 116
  start-page: 69
  year: 2008
  end-page: 78
  ident: CR5
  article-title: Peer assessment and evaluation in team-based learning
  publication-title: New Dir Teach Learn
  doi: 10.1002/tl.334
– start-page: 37
  year: 2019
  end-page: 70
  ident: CR3
  article-title: Teaching and learning in medical education: how theory can inform practice
  publication-title: Understanding medical education: evidence, theory, and practice
– volume: 13
  start-page: 155
  issue: 3
  year: 1998
  end-page: 158
  ident: CR21
  article-title: Oral versus written feedback in medical clinic
  publication-title: J Gen Intern Med
  doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00049.x
– volume: 34
  start-page: 796
  issue: 10
  year: 2012
  end-page: 801
  ident: CR1
  article-title: The educational theory basis of team-based learning
  publication-title: Med Teach
  doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.687120
– volume: 21
  start-page: 426
  issue: 1
  year: 2021
  ident: CR13
  article-title: Peer review in team-based learning: influencing feedback literacy
  publication-title: BMC Med Educ
  doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02821-6
– volume: 41
  start-page: 118
  issue: 3
  year: 2016
  end-page: 119
  ident: CR18
  article-title: Strategies for providing constructive feedback to students
  publication-title: Nurse Educ
  doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000227
– start-page: 59
  year: 2011
  end-page: 70
  ident: CR2
  publication-title: Teaching made easy: a manual for health professionals
– volume: 52
  start-page: 824
  issue: 9
  year: 2002
  end-page: 829
  ident: CR7
  article-title: Peer review in the classroom
  publication-title: Bioscience
  doi: 10.1641/00063568(2002)052[0824:PRITC]2.0.CO;2
– start-page: 103
  year: 2008
  end-page: 116
  ident: CR10
  article-title: Peer assessment in team-based learning
  publication-title: Team-based learning for health professions education
– year: 1978
  ident: CR12
  publication-title: Mind in society: development of higher psychological processes
– volume: 40
  start-page: 1100
  issue: 5
  year: 2021
  end-page: 1116
  ident: CR20
  article-title: Improving the understanding of written peer feedback through face-to-face peer dialogue: students’ perspective
  publication-title: High Educ Res Dev
  doi: 10.1080/07294360.2020.1798889
– volume: 11
  start-page: 571
  year: 2020
  end-page: 578
  ident: CR15
  article-title: Best practices in peer assessment: training tomorrow’s physicians to obtain and provide quality feedback
  publication-title: Adv Med Educ Pract
  doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S250761
– volume: 143
  start-page: 244
  issue: 2
  year: 2019
  end-page: 250
  ident: CR17
  article-title: Giving and receiving effective feedback: a review article and how-to guide
  publication-title: Arch Pathol Lab Med
  doi: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0058-RA
– volume: 19
  start-page: 321
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: CR22
  article-title: The utilization of peer feedback during collaborative learning in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review
  publication-title: BMC Med Educ
  doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1755-z
– volume: 11
  start-page: 571
  year: 2020
  ident: 1813_CR15
  publication-title: Adv Med Educ Pract
  doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S250761
– volume: 143
  start-page: 244
  issue: 2
  year: 2019
  ident: 1813_CR17
  publication-title: Arch Pathol Lab Med
  doi: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0058-RA
– volume: 22
  start-page: 371
  issue: 4
  year: 1997
  ident: 1813_CR6
  publication-title: Assess Eval High Educ
  doi: 10.1080/0260293970220402
– volume: 52
  start-page: 824
  issue: 9
  year: 2002
  ident: 1813_CR7
  publication-title: Bioscience
  doi: 10.1641/00063568(2002)052[0824:PRITC]2.0.CO;2
– volume: 19
  start-page: 321
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 1813_CR22
  publication-title: BMC Med Educ
  doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1755-z
– volume-title: Mind in society: development of higher psychological processes
  year: 1978
  ident: 1813_CR12
– volume: 3
  start-page: 77
  issue: 2
  year: 2006
  ident: 1813_CR14
  publication-title: Qual Res Psychol
  doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
– volume-title: Phenomenology of practice: meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing
  year: 2016
  ident: 1813_CR11
– volume: 19
  start-page: 25141
  year: 2014
  ident: 1813_CR16
  publication-title: Med Educ Online
  doi: 10.3402/meo.v19.25141
– volume: 116
  start-page: 69
  year: 2008
  ident: 1813_CR5
  publication-title: New Dir Teach Learn
  doi: 10.1002/tl.334
– volume: 41
  start-page: 118
  issue: 3
  year: 2016
  ident: 1813_CR18
  publication-title: Nurse Educ
  doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000227
– start-page: 103
  volume-title: Team-based learning for health professions education
  year: 2008
  ident: 1813_CR10
– start-page: 37
  volume-title: Understanding medical education: evidence, theory, and practice
  year: 2019
  ident: 1813_CR3
– volume: 34
  start-page: e275
  issue: 5
  year: 2012
  ident: 1813_CR4
  publication-title: Med Teach
  doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.651179
– volume: 24
  start-page: 331
  issue: 3
  year: 1999
  ident: 1813_CR8
  publication-title: Stud High Educ
  doi: 10.1080/03075079912331379935
– volume: 1
  start-page: 315
  issue: 52
  year: 2015
  ident: 1813_CR19
  publication-title: Comput Hum Behav
  doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.019
– volume: 34
  start-page: 796
  issue: 10
  year: 2012
  ident: 1813_CR1
  publication-title: Med Teach
  doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.687120
– start-page: 59
  volume-title: Teaching made easy: a manual for health professionals
  year: 2011
  ident: 1813_CR2
– volume: 25
  start-page: 149
  issue: 2
  year: 2000
  ident: 1813_CR9
  publication-title: Assess Eval High Educ
  doi: 10.1080/713611428
– volume: 21
  start-page: 426
  issue: 1
  year: 2021
  ident: 1813_CR13
  publication-title: BMC Med Educ
  doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02821-6
– volume: 40
  start-page: 1100
  issue: 5
  year: 2021
  ident: 1813_CR20
  publication-title: High Educ Res Dev
  doi: 10.1080/07294360.2020.1798889
– volume: 13
  start-page: 155
  issue: 3
  year: 1998
  ident: 1813_CR21
  publication-title: J Gen Intern Med
  doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00049.x
SSID ssj0000548140
Score 2.280907
Snippet Introduction There is limited information on medical students’ perceptions of peer feedback in team-based learning (TBL), both in terms of its value and how it...
There is limited information on medical students' perceptions of peer feedback in team-based learning (TBL), both in terms of its value and how it has affected...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 893
SubjectTerms Education
Medical Education
Original Research
Title A Qualitative Analysis on the Effectiveness of Peer Feedback in Team-Based Learning
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40670-023-01813-z
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37546199
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2847343338
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10403473
Volume 33
WOSCitedRecordID wos001015486700003&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAVX
  databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2156-8650
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0000548140
  issn: 2156-8650
  databaseCode: RSV
  dateStart: 20110301
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22
  providerName: Springer Nature
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LT9wwEB4VWlVcoKUFQilypd5aSxvbWTtHqFj1UoQKrfYW-ZWyArJoHxz49YwdJ9KWComeY1uW5_GNM55vAD77WirjVEFtrSUVknFaFqWgImdaGY0xOjex2YQ8PVXjcXmWisLm3Wv3LiUZPXVf7CZCSQlFjKGBZIrT-zV4iXCngjn-PP_d_1nBICTQOKUKmX9PXUWhR6Hl4xeSf6VJI_qMtv5v329gM0Wb5KhVj7fwwjfboVFzetSxDa9_pNz6Ozg_Ii2hRqQCJx1bCZk2BINE0tIcJ99IpjU5835GRgh-RtsrMmnIhdc39BhR0ZHE2vrnPfwanVx8-05TywVqhZALyiyvMYAzRkhfC2Z8iTLMdV2KwhW2lLpmQ3SIuTOcDbQQpXWW69whxglvpeE7sN5MG78HJFdK13IwZMx5wY3UjnlXCLRKMzToNzLIOxFUNvGRh7YY11XPpBxPrsKTq-LJVfcZfOnn3LZsHE-O_tRJtkKjCZkQ3fjpcl4FTOaC4_U8g91W0v16oScw3irLDNSKDvQDAiH36pdmchmJufFqO-C4cgZfO1WokkuYP7HP_ecN_wAbLGpTeIV4AOuL2dJ_hFf2bjGZzw5hTY7VYbSIBzrtBtA
linkProvider Springer Nature
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3dTxQxEJ8gGuUFFT9YRK2Jb9rktu1edx-BeMEIFyKn4a3p18oF3TN3hw_89U673U1OCIk8b9s0nen8pjszvwF472tZGlcW1NZaUiEZp1VRCSpypkuj0UfnJjabkONxeXZWnaSisEWX7d6FJKOl7ovdRCgpoYgxNJBMcXp1D-4LRKyQyPf19Hv_ZwWdkEDjlCpkbp66ikLXXMvrGZL_hEkj-owe323fT2AzeZtkr1WPp7Dmm63QqDkldWzBw-MUW38Gp3ukJdSIVOCkYyshs4agk0hamuNkG8msJifez8kIwc9oe0GmDZl4_YvuIyo6klhbfzyHb6NPk4NDmlouUCuEXFJmeY0OnDFC-low4yuUYa7rShSusJXUNRuiQcyd4Wyghaiss1znDjFOeCsNfwHrzazx20DystS1HAwZc15wI7Vj3hUCb6UZGrQbGeSdCJRNfOShLcZP1TMpx5NTeHIqnpy6yuBDP-d3y8Zx6-h3nWQVXpoQCdGNn10uVMBkLjg-zzN42Uq6Xy_0BMZXZZVBuaID_YBAyL36pZmeR2JufNoOOK6cwcdOFVQyCYtb9rnzf8PfwqPDyfGROvo8_vIKNljUrJCRuAvry_mlfw0P7J_ldDF_E-_FX2K1CMw
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwEB5BQRUXHoWW8DQSN7C6sZ11ciyPFQhYrdSCerP8hFUhW-1uOfTXM3aciKWoEuIc20o878zMNwDPfZC1cXVFbdCSCsk4bapGUFEyXRuNPjo3adiEnE7r4-Nm9lsXf6p271OSXU9DRGlq1_unLuwPjW8itpdQtDc0Ak5xen4Vrok4NCjG64dfhr8s6JBESKfcLfP3rZsW6YKbebFa8o-UabJEk1v__w234Wb2QslBxzZ34Ipvd-IA51zssQPbn3LO_S4cHpAOaCNBhJMexYQsWoLOI-ngj7POJItAZt4vyQSNotH2hMxbcuT1D_oKraUjGc316z34PHl79PodzaMYqBVCrimzPKBjZ4yQPghmfIO0LXVoROUq20gd2BgVZekMZyMtRGOd5bp0aPuEt9LwXdhqF62_D6Ssax3kaMyY84IbqR3zrhIorWZsUJ8UUPbkUDbjlMdxGd_VgLCcbk7hzal0c-q8gBfDntMOpePS1c96KisUppgh0a1fnK1UtNVccAzbC9jrqD6cF2cFY7TZFFBv8MOwIAJ1bz5p598SYDeGvCOOJxfwsmcLlVXF6pL3fPBvy5_C9uzNRH18P_3wEG6wxFixUPERbK2XZ_4xXLc_1_PV8kkSkV_ENxGw
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+Qualitative+Analysis+on+the+Effectiveness+of+Peer+Feedback+in+Team-Based+Learning&rft.jtitle=Medical+science+educator&rft.au=Lerchenfeldt%2C+Sarah&rft.au=Kamel-ElSayed%2C+Suzan&rft.au=Patino%2C+Gustavo&rft.au=Loftus%2C+Stephen&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.issn=2156-8650&rft.eissn=2156-8650&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=893&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs40670-023-01813-z&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2156-8650&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2156-8650&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2156-8650&client=summon