Environmental sustainability of liquid food packaging: Is there a gap between Danish consumers' perception and learnings from life cycle assessment?
The environmental impact of packaging has already been studied since the early development of the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, and today an extensive amount of studies exists. LCAs inform policy makers and guide companies in developing more environmentally sustainable packaging. From bot...
Uložené v:
| Vydané v: | Journal of cleaner production Ročník 210; s. 1193 - 1206 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autori: | , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | English |
| Vydavateľské údaje: |
Elsevier Ltd
10.02.2019
|
| Predmet: | |
| ISSN: | 0959-6526, 1879-1786 |
| On-line prístup: | Získať plný text |
| Tagy: |
Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
|
| Abstract | The environmental impact of packaging has already been studied since the early development of the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, and today an extensive amount of studies exists. LCAs inform policy makers and guide companies in developing more environmentally sustainable packaging. From both a policy and a business perspective it is also relevant to understand what citizens and consumers recognize as being an environmentally sustainable packaging. Does perceived environmental sustainability align with the results of LCAs? And if not, where do consumers go wrong?
In this study, we investigate how well-educated young consumers living in Denmark understand the environmental sustainability of five different kinds of packaging for liquid food (milk, beer, soft drink, olive oil and skinned tomatoes) based on an on-line survey and qualitative interviews. The results are compared with a streamlined LCA we performed for packaging of beer and soft drinks, and they are validated by means of comparative LCAs of these five product categories published in scientific literature.
The results of the consumer research show that consumers assess the environmental sustainability of the tested types of packaging primarily based on the material type and on what they can personally do at the disposal stage. The consumers covered in this study do, in general, not consider the impacts of production and of transport. Amongst the investigated packaging types, bio-based types and glass are perceived as the most environmentally sustainable ones, and plastic in general is perceived least favourable. Laminated cartons receive a mixed perception. LCA results show that plastic – and especially laminated cartons – can be environmentally preferable solutions, even though they may be difficult to recycle. Our streamlined LCA on beer and soft drink shows that there is a significant difference in environmental performance between one-way glass and refillable glass, but consumers seem not to be aware of this difference. Our findings show i) that there is a gap between Danish consumers' perception of environmental sustainability of packaging and LCA results, and ii) that consumers have limited knowledge of sustainability-related eco-labels. In order to close these gaps, actions are needed both from producers, retailers and policy makers. The final aim of such improvement efforts should be to give to the consumers the possibility to make choices based on better information.
[Display omitted]
•Investigation of consumers' perception of environmentally sustainable packaging.•On-line questionnaire and qualitative interviews with consumers living in Denmark.•Liquid foods investigated are: milk, beer, soft drink, olive oil and skinned tomatoes.•Perception results compared with life cycle assessment results from literature and from own LCA.•There is a gap between consumers‘ perception and life cycle assessment results. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | The environmental impact of packaging has already been studied since the early development of the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, and today an extensive amount of studies exists. LCAs inform policy makers and guide companies in developing more environmentally sustainable packaging. From both a policy and a business perspective it is also relevant to understand what citizens and consumers recognize as being an environmentally sustainable packaging. Does perceived environmental sustainability align with the results of LCAs? And if not, where do consumers go wrong?
In this study, we investigate how well-educated young consumers living in Denmark understand the environmental sustainability of five different kinds of packaging for liquid food (milk, beer, soft drink, olive oil and skinned tomatoes) based on an on-line survey and qualitative interviews. The results are compared with a streamlined LCA we performed for packaging of beer and soft drinks, and they are validated by means of comparative LCAs of these five product categories published in scientific literature.
The results of the consumer research show that consumers assess the environmental sustainability of the tested types of packaging primarily based on the material type and on what they can personally do at the disposal stage. The consumers covered in this study do, in general, not consider the impacts of production and of transport. Amongst the investigated packaging types, bio-based types and glass are perceived as the most environmentally sustainable ones, and plastic in general is perceived least favourable. Laminated cartons receive a mixed perception. LCA results show that plastic – and especially laminated cartons – can be environmentally preferable solutions, even though they may be difficult to recycle. Our streamlined LCA on beer and soft drink shows that there is a significant difference in environmental performance between one-way glass and refillable glass, but consumers seem not to be aware of this difference. Our findings show i) that there is a gap between Danish consumers' perception of environmental sustainability of packaging and LCA results, and ii) that consumers have limited knowledge of sustainability-related eco-labels. In order to close these gaps, actions are needed both from producers, retailers and policy makers. The final aim of such improvement efforts should be to give to the consumers the possibility to make choices based on better information.
[Display omitted]
•Investigation of consumers' perception of environmentally sustainable packaging.•On-line questionnaire and qualitative interviews with consumers living in Denmark.•Liquid foods investigated are: milk, beer, soft drink, olive oil and skinned tomatoes.•Perception results compared with life cycle assessment results from literature and from own LCA.•There is a gap between consumers‘ perception and life cycle assessment results. The environmental impact of packaging has already been studied since the early development of the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, and today an extensive amount of studies exists. LCAs inform policy makers and guide companies in developing more environmentally sustainable packaging. From both a policy and a business perspective it is also relevant to understand what citizens and consumers recognize as being an environmentally sustainable packaging. Does perceived environmental sustainability align with the results of LCAs? And if not, where do consumers go wrong?In this study, we investigate how well-educated young consumers living in Denmark understand the environmental sustainability of five different kinds of packaging for liquid food (milk, beer, soft drink, olive oil and skinned tomatoes) based on an on-line survey and qualitative interviews. The results are compared with a streamlined LCA we performed for packaging of beer and soft drinks, and they are validated by means of comparative LCAs of these five product categories published in scientific literature.The results of the consumer research show that consumers assess the environmental sustainability of the tested types of packaging primarily based on the material type and on what they can personally do at the disposal stage. The consumers covered in this study do, in general, not consider the impacts of production and of transport. Amongst the investigated packaging types, bio-based types and glass are perceived as the most environmentally sustainable ones, and plastic in general is perceived least favourable. Laminated cartons receive a mixed perception. LCA results show that plastic – and especially laminated cartons – can be environmentally preferable solutions, even though they may be difficult to recycle. Our streamlined LCA on beer and soft drink shows that there is a significant difference in environmental performance between one-way glass and refillable glass, but consumers seem not to be aware of this difference. Our findings show i) that there is a gap between Danish consumers' perception of environmental sustainability of packaging and LCA results, and ii) that consumers have limited knowledge of sustainability-related eco-labels. In order to close these gaps, actions are needed both from producers, retailers and policy makers. The final aim of such improvement efforts should be to give to the consumers the possibility to make choices based on better information. |
| Author | Niero, Monia Bey, Niki Boesen, Søren |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Søren surname: Boesen fullname: Boesen, Søren organization: Division for Quantitative Sustainability Assessment (QSA), Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Diplomvej 372, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark – sequence: 2 givenname: Niki surname: Bey fullname: Bey, Niki organization: Division for Quantitative Sustainability Assessment (QSA), Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Diplomvej 372, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark – sequence: 3 givenname: Monia surname: Niero fullname: Niero, Monia email: monian@plan.aau.dk organization: Division for Quantitative Sustainability Assessment (QSA), Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Diplomvej 372, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark |
| BookMark | eNqFkUFv1DAUhC1UJLaFn4DkG1wS7KztJHCoUCm0UiUucLYc-2XrxbFTP6do_wc_mKy2p156epeZT_NmzslZTBEIec9ZzRlXn_b13gaYc6obxrua85pJ-YpseNf2FW87dUY2rJd9pWSj3pBzxD1jvGWt2JB_1_HR5xQniMUEigsW46MZfPDlQNNIg39YvKNjSo7Oxv4xOx93n-kt0nIPGaihOzPTAcpfgEi_mejxntoUcZkg4wc6Q7YwF58iNdHRACbHlYB0zGla6SNQe1jjU4MIiMccl2_J69EEhHdP94L8_n796-qmuvv54_bq611lhWhL1UijuBiGjivplNl2o5XtKFUjnGuVEEwYN_bAwYlODm4YmJAcet6zrVRbbrcX5OOJu3b3sAAWPXm0EIKJkBbUTdOwrlNtK1bpl5PU5oSYYdTWF3N8q2Tjg-ZMH7fQe_20hT5uoTnX6xarWz5zz9lPJh9e9F2efLC28Ogha7QeogXnM9iiXfIvEP4Dq8asaA |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3390_su14138155 crossref_primary_10_3390_foods10050929 crossref_primary_10_1007_s43615_022_00217_2 crossref_primary_10_1111_ijcs_12560 crossref_primary_10_3390_su12062192 crossref_primary_10_1080_21681015_2021_1951858 crossref_primary_10_3390_logistics5040081 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11356_021_17094_1 crossref_primary_10_1002_bse_70037 crossref_primary_10_1002_bse_3490 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10668_023_03930_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2021_128166 crossref_primary_10_3390_su13158478 crossref_primary_10_1002_bse_3891 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rser_2021_111858 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2019_119792 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2023_137824 crossref_primary_10_3390_su13148021 crossref_primary_10_1108_BFJ_05_2021_0576 crossref_primary_10_3390_su13041872 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2021_106125 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodcont_2021_108682 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spc_2022_06_002 crossref_primary_10_3390_su11216131 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2020_122624 crossref_primary_10_3390_foods11193087 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spc_2024_10_001 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12302_021_00582_z crossref_primary_10_1002_bse_3243 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodqual_2022_104658 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodqual_2025_105647 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2021_113975 crossref_primary_10_3389_frsus_2022_1007060 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2024_122181 crossref_primary_10_3390_su15043665 crossref_primary_10_1108_BFJ_05_2021_0603 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spc_2022_08_022 crossref_primary_10_3390_su13052472 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2022_132145 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2023_136680 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvp_2022_101814 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2020_123361 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2023_140181 crossref_primary_10_3390_en14227634 crossref_primary_10_1111_jiec_13447 crossref_primary_10_3390_foods11162437 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2024_120868 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsufs_2024_1444902 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2021_e07154 crossref_primary_10_3390_su14010190 crossref_primary_10_3390_su15097625 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2021_105977 crossref_primary_10_1177_0734242X241241606 crossref_primary_10_3390_foods11213424 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2023_135984 crossref_primary_10_3390_foods12193542 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_021_01946_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2020_120936 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2022_e10697 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spc_2025_02_003 crossref_primary_10_3390_su13084209 crossref_primary_10_1002_tie_22259 crossref_primary_10_1007_s43615_024_00437_8 crossref_primary_10_3390_su152014727 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2021_127111 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clrc_2025_100262 crossref_primary_10_3390_foods11162388 crossref_primary_10_1080_10496491_2020_1729320 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2020_139846 crossref_primary_10_1080_15440478_2025_2505608 crossref_primary_10_3390_beverages10030086 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolecon_2021_107265 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eiar_2025_107819 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2022_106156 crossref_primary_10_3390_su16167235 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2024_107655 crossref_primary_10_3390_su17177797 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jretconser_2025_104228 crossref_primary_10_1111_ijcs_13051 crossref_primary_10_3390_su17146654 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodqual_2025_105438 crossref_primary_10_1108_BFJ_11_2020_1050 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2021_130158 crossref_primary_10_3390_su16124896 crossref_primary_10_3390_su14073747 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhtm_2020_12_006 crossref_primary_10_1038_s44222_023_00142_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2020_120123 crossref_primary_10_1002_mar_21743 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2019_104479 crossref_primary_10_1002_anie_202423406 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2020_120888 crossref_primary_10_1111_jiec_13134 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_techfore_2020_120342 crossref_primary_10_1108_BFJ_04_2024_0385 crossref_primary_10_3390_su13031356 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2023_138390 crossref_primary_10_3390_foods11091371 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2019_119861 crossref_primary_10_1108_SAMPJ_08_2024_0812 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2019_135820 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spc_2024_02_019 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spc_2022_09_022 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spc_2021_02_030 crossref_primary_10_1111_jiec_70079 crossref_primary_10_1108_BFJ_04_2021_0416 crossref_primary_10_3390_su12052088 crossref_primary_10_3390_su13179789 crossref_primary_10_3390_recycling6030050 crossref_primary_10_1002_ange_202423406 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2024_107511 crossref_primary_10_1108_JPBM_10_2023_4768 crossref_primary_10_1108_BFJ_01_2025_0103 crossref_primary_10_1177_0734242X241279902 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2023_117410 crossref_primary_10_1007_s43039_023_00084_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodqual_2023_104884 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_023_02218_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_020_01804_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2021_129347 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2023_106948 crossref_primary_10_1002_bse_2587 crossref_primary_10_1002_bse_3556 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clema_2025_100330 crossref_primary_10_3390_foods10050984 crossref_primary_10_1108_BFJ_01_2024_0069 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2023_137169 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_socimp_2023_100017 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10924_023_03055_x crossref_primary_10_1108_BFJ_12_2024_1234 crossref_primary_10_3390_app142411697 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_024_02349_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2020_123734 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10668_025_06304_2 crossref_primary_10_1111_jiec_13477 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2022_130904 crossref_primary_10_1051_e3sconf_201911900009 crossref_primary_10_1080_08974438_2024_2304361 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvp_2024_102450 crossref_primary_10_1108_SAMPJ_08_2022_0413 crossref_primary_10_3390_su11247197 crossref_primary_10_3390_foods12224103 crossref_primary_10_1080_00207233_2022_2073090 crossref_primary_10_1080_15378020_2025_2537077 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2020_104933 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2023_138807 crossref_primary_10_1155_ajgw_9946341 crossref_primary_10_1002_jcpy_70003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_afres_2023_100310 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sca_2024_100090 crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture12122159 crossref_primary_10_1108_BFJ_03_2022_0263 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fbp_2025_03_015 crossref_primary_10_1002_jtr_2418 crossref_primary_10_1002_agr_21988 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.022 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.018 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.127 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.106 10.1111/jiec.12123 10.1002/pts.2123 10.1007/BF02978624 10.1007/s11367-012-0459-y 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.042 10.1002/pts.1977 10.1007/BF01204134 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.106 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.242 10.1177/0734242X13489782 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.122 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.154 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.102 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.097 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.08.001 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.05.002 10.1007/s11367-010-0218-x 10.1002/pts.887 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.06.023 10.1021/es204163f 10.1007/s11367-012-0489-5 10.1086/323732 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.140 10.1007/978-94-017-9744-3_14 10.1007/s11367-012-0484-x 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.036 10.1016/0950-3293(94)90050-7 10.1007/s11367-010-0193-2 10.1111/jiec.12310 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.092 10.1108/07363760610655032 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.171 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.013 10.1007/s11367-008-0057-1 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.11.005 10.1002/pts.2219 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.07.012 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.015 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.217 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.06.022 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.143 10.3390/su7032818 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.002 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.002 10.1007/s11367-015-1016-2 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.118 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2018 Elsevier Ltd |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2018 Elsevier Ltd |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7S9 L.6 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | AGRICOLA |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Engineering |
| EISSN | 1879-1786 |
| EndPage | 1206 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 10_1016_j_jclepro_2018_11_055 S0959652618334553 |
| GeographicLocations | Denmark |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Denmark |
| GroupedDBID | --K --M ..I .~1 0R~ 1B1 1RT 1~. 1~5 4.4 457 4G. 5GY 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JM 9JN AABNK AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAHCO AAIAV AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AARJD AAXUO ABFYP ABJNI ABLST ABMAC ABYKQ ACDAQ ACGFS ACRLP ADBBV ADEZE ADHUB AEBSH AEKER AENEX AFKWA AFTJW AFXIZ AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AHEUO AHHHB AHIDL AIEXJ AIKHN AITUG AJOXV AKIFW ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ AXJTR BELTK BKOJK BLECG BLXMC CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 FDB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-Q GBLVA HMC IHE J1W JARJE K-O KCYFY KOM LY9 M41 MO0 MS~ N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 RIG RNS ROL RPZ SCC SDF SDG SDP SES SPC SPCBC SSJ SSR SSZ T5K ~G- 29K 9DU AAHBH AAQXK AATTM AAXKI AAYWO AAYXX ABFNM ABWVN ABXDB ACLOT ACRPL ACVFH ADCNI ADMUD ADNMO AEGFY AEIPS AEUPX AFJKZ AFPUW AGQPQ AIGII AIIUN AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ANKPU APXCP ASPBG AVWKF AZFZN CITATION D-I EFKBS FEDTE FGOYB G-2 HVGLF HZ~ R2- SEN SEW WUQ ZY4 ~HD 7S9 L.6 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-25a614bb8165d6a38fc57f5624dd764404adf9e1ed485bdbb0451e919035631c3 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 173 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000456762600108&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 0959-6526 |
| IngestDate | Thu Oct 02 04:43:35 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:34:04 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 04:25:15 EST 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:17:06 EST 2024 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Keywords | Consumer research Survey Circular economy Beverage containers Eco-labels Qualitative interviews |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c447t-25a614bb8165d6a38fc57f5624dd764404adf9e1ed485bdbb0451e919035631c3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://hdl.handle.net/11382/564712 |
| PQID | 2220886774 |
| PQPubID | 24069 |
| PageCount | 14 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2220886774 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_jclepro_2018_11_055 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2018_11_055 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_jclepro_2018_11_055 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2019-02-10 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2019-02-10 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2019 text: 2019-02-10 day: 10 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of cleaner production |
| PublicationYear | 2019 |
| Publisher | Elsevier Ltd |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Ltd |
| References | Simon, Amor, Földényi (bib53) 2015; 112 Hartikainen, Roininen, Katajajuuri, Pulkkinen (bib19) 2014; 73 WRAP (bib71) 2013 Braungart, Engelfried (bib4) 1992; 1 Hauschild, Goedkoop, Guinée, Heijungs, Huijbregts, Jolliet, Margni, Schryver, Humbert, Laurent, Sala, Pant (bib20) 2013; 18 Igos, Benetto, Meyer, Baustert, Othoniel (bib23) 2018; 1–14 Gadema, Oglethorpe (bib15) 2011; 36 Shi, Visschers, Bumann, Siegrist (bib52) 2016; 172 Lindh, Olsson, Williams (bib32) 2015 Martinho, Pires, Portela, Fonseca (bib33) 2015; 103 OECD (bib42) 2011 Zhao, Geng, Liu, Tao, Xue (bib74) 2018; 171 EC (bib7) 2015 Frischknecht, Jungbluth, Althaus, Doka, Heck, Hellweg, Hischier, Nemecek, Rebitzer, Spielmann, Wernet (bib14) 2007 Petersen, Brockhaus (bib45) 2017; 161 Lemke, Luzio (bib30) 2014; 18 Miljøstyrelsen (bib35) 2015 Xie, Li, Qiao, Sun, Sun (bib72) 2011; 19 Detzel, Mönckert (bib6) 2009; 14 Schäufele, Hamm (bib50) 2017; 147 Scipioni, Niero, Mazzi, Manzardo, Piubello (bib51) 2013; 18 Speck, Selke, Auras, Fitzsimmons (bib55) 2015; 28 Janßen, Langen (bib25) 2017; 143 INCPEN (bib24) 2009 Pasqualino, Meneses, Castells (bib44) 2011; 103 Herbes, Beuthner, Ramme (bib21) 2018; 194 Amienyo, Gujba, Stichnothe, Azapagic (bib2) 2013; 18 Ampuero, Vila (bib3) 2006; 23 EEA (bib9) 2013 Dansk Retursystem (bib2a) 2014 Vincenzi, Possan, Andrade, Pituco, Santos, Jasse (bib67) 2018; 170 Li, Long, Chen (bib31) 2017; 161 O'Rourke, Ringer (bib41) 2016; 20 Ellen MacArthur Foundation (bib10) 2015 Yokokawa, Kikuchi-Uehara, Sugiyama, Hirao (bib73) 2018; 174 Steenis, van Herpen, van der Lans, Ligthart, van Trijp (bib56) 2017; 162 Gelici-Zeko, Lutters, ten Klooster, Weijzen (bib16) 2013; 26 Niero, Negrelli, Hoffmeyer, Olsen, Birkved (bib38) 2016; 126 Niero, Olsen (bib39) 2016; 114 Kalbar, Birkved, Karmakar, Nygaard, Hauschild (bib26) 2017; 74 Hunt, Franklin (bib22) 1996; 1 Wikström, Williams, Verghese, Clune (bib70) 2014; 73 PE Americas (bib47) 2010 Boesen (bib1a) 2016 Noblit, Hare (bib40) 1988 von Falkenstein, Wellenreuther, Detzel (bib68) 2010; 15 Meneses, Pasqualino, Castells (bib34) 2012; 107 Niero, Kalbar (bib37) 2019; 140 Nielsen, Reisch, Thorgersen (bib36) 2016; 133 Korhonen, Fuente, Hurley, Chrysochou, Guzmán-siller, Cabezas, González-buesa, Tanprasert, Pettersen (bib27) 2015 Stotz, Niero, Bey, Paraskevas (bib57) 2017; 127 van Dam (bib61) 1996; 20 Wikstrom, Williams, Venkatesh (bib69) 2016; 137 EMF (bib11) 2013 Groening, Sarkis, Zhu (bib17) 2017; 172 Grosso, Niero, Rigamonti (bib18) 2017; 35 Accorsi, Versari, Manzini (bib1) 2015; 7 Laurent, Olsen, Hauschild (bib29) 2012; 46 Røpke (bib49) 2009; 68 European Union (bib12) 2018 Verghese, Horne, Carre (bib65) 2010; 15 EC (bib8) 2013 Styles, Schoenberger, Galvez-Martos (bib58) 2012; 65 Peterson (bib46) 2012; 28 Verghese, Lewis, Fitzpatrick (bib64) 2012 van Dam, van Trijp (bib62) 1994; 5 Svanes, Vold, Møller, Pettersen, Larsen, Hanssen (bib59) 2010; 23 Singh, Verma (bib54) 2018; 167 Laurent, Hauschild (bib28) 2015 de Koeijer, Wever, Henseler (bib5) 2017; 30 Vieitez, Eder, Villanueva, Saveyn (bib66) 2011 Polizzi di Sorrentino, Woelbert, Sala (bib48) 2016; 21 UNEP, SETAC (bib60) 2013 Paraskevas, Kellens, Dewulf, Duflou (bib43) 2015; 105 Velis, Brunner (bib63) 2013; 31 OECD (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib42) 2011 INCPEN (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib24) 2009 Kalbar (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib26) 2017; 74 Detzel (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib6) 2009; 14 Lemke (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib30) 2014; 18 Peterson (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib46) 2012; 28 EMF (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib11) 2013 Vincenzi (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib67) 2018; 170 Amienyo (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib2) 2013; 18 WRAP (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib71) 2013 Igos (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib23) 2018; 1–14 PE Americas (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib47) 2010 Niero (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib37) 2019; 140 Simon (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib53) 2015; 112 van Dam (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib62) 1994; 5 Hauschild (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib20) 2013; 18 von Falkenstein (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib68) 2010; 15 Braungart (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib4) 1992; 1 Frischknecht (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib14) 2007 Gadema (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib15) 2011; 36 Grosso (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib18) 2017; 35 Pasqualino (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib44) 2011; 103 Velis (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib63) 2013; 31 EC (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib8) 2013 Miljøstyrelsen (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib35) 2015 Xie (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib72) 2011; 19 Wikstrom (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib69) 2016; 137 Paraskevas (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib43) 2015; 105 Røpke (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib49) 2009; 68 Hunt (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib22) 1996; 1 Niero (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib38) 2016; 126 Verghese (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib65) 2010; 15 Accorsi (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib1) 2015; 7 Speck (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib55) 2015; 28 O'Rourke (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib41) 2016; 20 de Koeijer (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib5) 2017; 30 Li (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib31) 2017; 161 Laurent (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib28) 2015 Niero (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib39) 2016; 114 Korhonen (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib27) 2015 Steenis (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib56) 2017; 162 Svanes (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib59) 2010; 23 Petersen (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib45) 2017; 161 Polizzi di Sorrentino (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib48) 2016; 21 Vieitez (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib66) 2011 Gelici-Zeko (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib16) 2013; 26 EEA (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib9) 2013 European Union (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib12) 2018 Nielsen (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib36) 2016; 133 Zhao (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib74) 2018; 171 Meneses (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib34) 2012; 107 Janßen (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib25) 2017; 143 Verghese (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib64) 2012 Herbes (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib21) 2018; 194 Dansk Retursystem (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib2a) 2014 Hartikainen (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib19) 2014; 73 Groening (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib17) 2017; 172 Yokokawa (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib73) 2018; 174 Ellen MacArthur Foundation (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib10) 2015 Noblit (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib40) 1988 Schäufele (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib50) 2017; 147 Stotz (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib57) 2017; 127 Scipioni (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib51) 2013; 18 Boesen (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib1a) 2016 Shi (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib52) 2016; 172 Styles (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib58) 2012; 65 Martinho (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib33) 2015; 103 Singh (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib54) 2018; 167 Wikström (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib70) 2014; 73 Ampuero (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib3) 2006; 23 van Dam (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib61) 1996; 20 EC (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib7) 2015 Laurent (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib29) 2012; 46 Lindh (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib32) 2015 UNEP (10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib60) 2013 |
| References_xml | – year: 2016 ident: bib1a article-title: Consumer Perceptions of Sustainable Packaging. Design for a Circular Economy – year: 2014 ident: bib2a article-title: Årsrapport 2014 (in Danish; English title "Annual report 2014" Danish Return System) – year: 2012 ident: bib64 article-title: Packaging for Sustainability – volume: 36 start-page: 815 year: 2011 end-page: 822 ident: bib15 article-title: The use and usefulness of carbon labelling food: a policy perspective from a survey of UK supermarket shoppers publication-title: Food Policy – volume: 1–14 year: 2018 ident: bib23 article-title: How to treat uncertainties in life cycle assessment studies? publication-title: Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. – volume: 31 start-page: 539 year: 2013 end-page: 540 ident: bib63 article-title: Recycling and resource efficiency: it is time for a change from quantity to quality publication-title: Waste Manag. Res. – volume: 15 start-page: 608 year: 2010 end-page: 620 ident: bib65 article-title: PIQET: the design and development of an online “streamlined” LCA tool for sustainable packaging design decision support publication-title: Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. – volume: 162 start-page: 286 year: 2017 end-page: 298 ident: bib56 article-title: Consumer response to packaging design: the role of packaging materials and graphics in sustainability perceptions and product evaluations publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. – volume: 174 start-page: 26 year: 2018 end-page: 34 ident: bib73 article-title: Framework for analyzing the effects of packaging on food loss reduction by considering consumer behavior publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. – volume: 172 start-page: 1848 year: 2017 end-page: 1866 ident: bib17 article-title: Green marketing consumer-level theory review: a compendium of applied theories and further research directions publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. – volume: 73 start-page: 100 year: 2014 end-page: 108 ident: bib70 article-title: The influence of packaging attributes on consumer behaviour in food-packaging life cycle assessment studies - a neglected topic publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. – year: 2015 ident: bib10 article-title: Growth within: a Circular Economy Vision for a Competitive Europe – volume: 103 start-page: 357 year: 2011 end-page: 365 ident: bib44 article-title: The carbon footprint and energy consumption of beverage packaging selection and disposal publication-title: J. Food Eng. – volume: 30 start-page: 443 year: 2017 end-page: 460 ident: bib5 article-title: Realizing product-packaging combinations in circular systems: shaping the research agenda publication-title: Packag. Technol. Sci. – year: 2010 ident: bib47 article-title: Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Aluminum Beverage Cans – volume: 28 start-page: 450 year: 2012 end-page: 461 ident: bib46 article-title: On the use of college students in social science research: insights from a second-order meta-analysis publication-title: J. Consum. Res. – volume: 147 start-page: 379 year: 2017 end-page: 394 ident: bib50 article-title: Consumers' perceptions, preferences and willingness-to-pay for wine with sustainability characteristics: a review publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. – volume: 15 start-page: 938 year: 2010 end-page: 945 ident: bib68 article-title: LCA studies comparing beverage cartons and alternative packaging: can overall conclusions be drawn? publication-title: Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. – volume: 1 start-page: 4 year: 1996 end-page: 7 ident: bib22 article-title: LCA - how it came about - personal reflections on the origin and the development of LCA in the USA publication-title: Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. – year: 2015 ident: bib27 article-title: Package value for the millennial generation – results of a cross-continental study publication-title: 27th IAPRI Symposium on Packaging 2015 Package – volume: 126 start-page: 352 year: 2016 end-page: 362 ident: bib38 article-title: Closing the loop for aluminium cans: life Cycle Assessment of progression in Cradle-to-Cradle certification levels publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. – volume: 161 start-page: 345 year: 2017 end-page: 354 ident: bib45 article-title: Dancing in the dark: challenges for product developers to improve and communicate product sustainability publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. – volume: 68 start-page: 2490 year: 2009 end-page: 2497 ident: bib49 article-title: Theories of practice - new inspiration for ecological economic studies on consumption publication-title: Ecol. Econ. – volume: 74 start-page: 109 year: 2017 end-page: 118 ident: bib26 article-title: Can carbon footprint serve as proxy of the environmental burden from urban consumption patterns? publication-title: Ecol. Indic. – volume: 172 start-page: 1646 year: 2016 end-page: 1653 ident: bib52 article-title: Consumers' climate-impact estimations of different food products publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. – volume: 107 start-page: 76 year: 2012 end-page: 83 ident: bib34 article-title: Environmental assessment of the milk life cycle: the effect of packaging selection and the variability of milk production data publication-title: J. Environ. Manage. – year: 2011 ident: bib66 article-title: End-of-waste Criteria for Glass Cullet: Technical Proposals, JRC Scientific and Technical Reports – volume: 35 year: 2017 ident: bib18 article-title: Circular economy, permanent materials and limitations to recycling: where do we stand and what is the way forward? publication-title: Waste Manag. Res. – year: 2015 ident: bib35 article-title: Statistik for Emballageforsyning Og Indsamling Af Emballageaffald 2012 (Statistics for Sources of Packaging Materials and Collection of Packaging Waste, 2012) – year: 1988 ident: bib40 article-title: Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies – volume: 127 year: 2017 ident: bib57 article-title: Environmental screening of novel technologies to increase material circularity: a case study on aluminium cans publication-title: Resour. Conserv. Recycl. – volume: 65 start-page: 57 year: 2012 end-page: 78 ident: bib58 article-title: Environmental improvement of product supply chains: a review of European retailers' performance publication-title: Resour. Conserv. Recycl. – year: 2009 ident: bib24 article-title: Table for One - the Energy Cost to Feed One Person – volume: 112 start-page: 1 year: 2015 end-page: 11 ident: bib53 article-title: Life cycle impact assessment of beverage packaging systems: focus on the collection of post-consumer bottles publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. – volume: 137 start-page: 895 year: 2016 end-page: 902 ident: bib69 article-title: The influence of packaging attributes on recycling and food waste behaviour ? An environmental comparison of two packaging alternatives publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. – volume: 114 start-page: 18 year: 2016 end-page: 31 ident: bib39 article-title: Circular economy : to be or not to be in a closed product loop ? A Life Cycle Assessment of aluminium cans with inclusion of alloying elements publication-title: Resour. Conserv. Recycl. – volume: 105 start-page: 357 year: 2015 end-page: 370 ident: bib43 article-title: Environmental modelling of aluminium recycling: a Life Cycle Assessment tool for sustainable metal management publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. – volume: 18 start-page: 673 year: 2013 end-page: 682 ident: bib51 article-title: Significance of the use of non-renewable fossil CED as proxy indicator for screening LCA in the beverage packaging sector publication-title: Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. – volume: 7 start-page: 2818 year: 2015 end-page: 2840 ident: bib1 article-title: Glass vs. plastic: life cycle assessment of extra-virgin olive oil bottles across global supply chains publication-title: Sustainability – volume: 18 start-page: 683 year: 2013 end-page: 697 ident: bib20 article-title: Identifying best existing practice for characterization modeling in life cycle impact assessment publication-title: Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. – volume: 171 start-page: 1664 year: 2018 end-page: 1671 ident: bib74 article-title: Consumers' perception, purchase intention, and willingness to pay for carbon-labeled products: a case study of Chengdu in China publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. – volume: 14 start-page: 70 year: 2009 end-page: 79 ident: bib6 article-title: Environmental evaluation of aluminium cans for beverages in the German context publication-title: Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. – volume: 26 start-page: 215 year: 2013 end-page: 228 ident: bib16 article-title: Studying the influence of packaging design on consumer perceptions (of dairy products) using categorizing and perceptual mapping publication-title: Packag. Technol. Sci. – volume: 103 start-page: 58 year: 2015 end-page: 68 ident: bib33 article-title: Factors affecting consumers' choices concerning sustainable packaging during product purchase and recycling publication-title: Resour. Conserv. Recycl. – volume: 20 start-page: 882 year: 2016 end-page: 892 ident: bib41 article-title: The impact of sustainability information on consumer decision making publication-title: J. Ind. Ecol. – volume: 19 start-page: 2100 year: 2011 end-page: 2106 ident: bib72 article-title: A comparative study on milk packaging using life cycle assessment: from PA-PE-Al laminate and polyethylene in China publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. – volume: 28 start-page: 579 year: 2015 end-page: 588 ident: bib55 article-title: Choice of life cycle assessment software can impact packaging system decisions publication-title: Packag. Technol. Sci. – volume: 23 start-page: 100 year: 2006 end-page: 112 ident: bib3 article-title: Consumer perceptions of product packaging publication-title: J. Consum. Market. – volume: 5 start-page: 253 year: 1994 end-page: 261 ident: bib62 article-title: Consumer perceptions of, and preferences for, beverage containers publication-title: Food Qual. Prefer. – volume: 18 start-page: 77 year: 2013 end-page: 92 ident: bib2 article-title: Life cycle environmental impacts of carbonated soft drinks publication-title: Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. – year: 2007 ident: bib14 article-title: Overview and Methodology. Ecoinvent Report No. 1. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories – volume: 20 start-page: 607 year: 1996 end-page: 614 ident: bib61 article-title: The consumer point of view publication-title: Environ. Manage. – volume: 143 start-page: 1233 year: 2017 end-page: 1245 ident: bib25 article-title: The bunch of sustainability labels – do consumers differentiate? publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. – year: 2013 ident: bib60 article-title: Analysis of Life Cycle Assessment in Packaging for Food & Beverage Applications – volume: 170 start-page: 1369 year: 2018 end-page: 1386 ident: bib67 article-title: Assessment of environmental sustainability perception through item response theory: a case study in Brazil publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. – volume: 73 start-page: 285 year: 2014 end-page: 293 ident: bib19 article-title: Finnish consumer perceptions of carbon footprints and carbon labelling of food products publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. – volume: 23 start-page: 161 year: 2010 end-page: 175 ident: bib59 article-title: Sustainable packaging Design : a holistic methodology for packaging design publication-title: Packag. Technol. Sci. – volume: 46 start-page: 4100 year: 2012 end-page: 4108 ident: bib29 article-title: Limitations of carbon footprint as indicator of environmental sustainability publication-title: Environ. Sci. Technol. – volume: 194 start-page: 203 year: 2018 end-page: 218 ident: bib21 article-title: Consumer attitudes towards biobased packaging – a cross-cultural comparative study publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. – year: 2013 ident: bib71 article-title: Consumer Attitudes to Food Waste and Food Packaging – volume: 18 start-page: 619 year: 2014 end-page: 630 ident: bib30 article-title: Exploring green consumers' mind-set toward green product design and life cycle assessment publication-title: J. Ind. Ecol. – volume: 133 start-page: 65 year: 2016 end-page: 77 ident: bib36 article-title: Sustainable user innovation from a policy perspective : a systematic literature review publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. – volume: 167 start-page: 473 year: 2018 end-page: 483 ident: bib54 article-title: Factors influencing Indian consumers' actual buying behaviour towards organic food products publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. – volume: 1 start-page: 613 year: 1992 end-page: 619 ident: bib4 article-title: An “intelligent product system” to replace “waste management publication-title: Fresenius Environ. Bull. – year: 2015 ident: bib7 article-title: COM (2015) 614 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Closing the Loop - an EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy – year: 2013 ident: bib11 article-title: Towards the Circular Economy. Opportunities for the Consumer Goods Sector – start-page: 271 year: 2015 end-page: 300 ident: bib28 article-title: Normalization publication-title: Life Cycle Impact Assessment, LCA Compendium - the Complete World of Life Cycle Assessment – volume: 161 start-page: 1237 year: 2017 end-page: 1250 ident: bib31 article-title: Empirical study of the willingness of consumers to purchase low-carbon products by considering carbon labels: a case study publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. – year: 2011 ident: bib42 article-title: Perspectives on Global Development 2012 Social Cohesion in a Shifting World – volume: 21 start-page: 237 year: 2016 end-page: 251 ident: bib48 article-title: Consumers and their behavior: state of the art in behavioral science supporting use phase modeling in LCA and ecodesign publication-title: Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. – year: 2013 ident: bib8 article-title: Commission Recommendation of 9 April 2013 on the Use of Common Methods to Measure and Communicate the Life Cycle Environmental Performance of Products and Organisations – volume: 140 start-page: 305 year: 2019 end-page: 312 ident: bib37 article-title: Coupling material circularity indicators and life cycle based indicators: a proposal to advance the assessment of circular economy strategies at the product level publication-title: Resour. Conserv. Recycl. – year: 2015 ident: bib32 article-title: Consumer perceptions of food packaging: contributing to or counteracting environmentally sustainable development? publication-title: Packag. Technol. Sci. – year: 2013 ident: bib9 article-title: Managing Municipal Solid Waste – year: 2018 ident: bib12 article-title: Directive of the Euroepan Parliament and the Council Amending Directive 94/62/EC on Packaging and Packaging Waste – volume: 74 start-page: 109 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib26 article-title: Can carbon footprint serve as proxy of the environmental burden from urban consumption patterns? publication-title: Ecol. Indic. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.022 – volume: 112 start-page: 1 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib53 article-title: Life cycle impact assessment of beverage packaging systems: focus on the collection of post-consumer bottles publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. – volume: 73 start-page: 285 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib19 article-title: Finnish consumer perceptions of carbon footprints and carbon labelling of food products publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.018 – volume: 161 start-page: 345 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib45 article-title: Dancing in the dark: challenges for product developers to improve and communicate product sustainability publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.127 – volume: 194 start-page: 203 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib21 article-title: Consumer attitudes towards biobased packaging – a cross-cultural comparative study publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.106 – volume: 18 start-page: 619 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib30 article-title: Exploring green consumers' mind-set toward green product design and life cycle assessment publication-title: J. Ind. Ecol. doi: 10.1111/jiec.12123 – volume: 28 start-page: 579 issue: 7 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib55 article-title: Choice of life cycle assessment software can impact packaging system decisions publication-title: Packag. Technol. Sci. doi: 10.1002/pts.2123 – volume: 1 start-page: 4 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib22 article-title: LCA - how it came about - personal reflections on the origin and the development of LCA in the USA publication-title: Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. doi: 10.1007/BF02978624 – volume: 18 start-page: 77 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib2 article-title: Life cycle environmental impacts of carbonated soft drinks publication-title: Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. doi: 10.1007/s11367-012-0459-y – volume: 73 start-page: 100 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib70 article-title: The influence of packaging attributes on consumer behaviour in food-packaging life cycle assessment studies - a neglected topic publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.042 – year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib2a – volume: 26 start-page: 215 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib16 article-title: Studying the influence of packaging design on consumer perceptions (of dairy products) using categorizing and perceptual mapping publication-title: Packag. Technol. Sci. doi: 10.1002/pts.1977 – volume: 20 start-page: 607 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib61 article-title: The consumer point of view publication-title: Environ. Manage. doi: 10.1007/BF01204134 – volume: 167 start-page: 473 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib54 article-title: Factors influencing Indian consumers' actual buying behaviour towards organic food products publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.106 – volume: 174 start-page: 26 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib73 article-title: Framework for analyzing the effects of packaging on food loss reduction by considering consumer behavior publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.242 – volume: 31 start-page: 539 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib63 article-title: Recycling and resource efficiency: it is time for a change from quantity to quality publication-title: Waste Manag. Res. doi: 10.1177/0734242X13489782 – volume: 126 start-page: 352 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib38 article-title: Closing the loop for aluminium cans: life Cycle Assessment of progression in Cradle-to-Cradle certification levels publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.122 – year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib10 – volume: 161 start-page: 1237 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib31 article-title: Empirical study of the willingness of consumers to purchase low-carbon products by considering carbon labels: a case study publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.154 – year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib8 – volume: 105 start-page: 357 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib43 article-title: Environmental modelling of aluminium recycling: a Life Cycle Assessment tool for sustainable metal management publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.102 – year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib27 article-title: Package value for the millennial generation – results of a cross-continental study – volume: 137 start-page: 895 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib69 article-title: The influence of packaging attributes on recycling and food waste behaviour ? An environmental comparison of two packaging alternatives publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.097 – volume: 36 start-page: 815 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib15 article-title: The use and usefulness of carbon labelling food: a policy perspective from a survey of UK supermarket shoppers publication-title: Food Policy doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.08.001 – volume: 65 start-page: 57 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib58 article-title: Environmental improvement of product supply chains: a review of European retailers' performance publication-title: Resour. Conserv. Recycl. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.05.002 – volume: 15 start-page: 938 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib68 article-title: LCA studies comparing beverage cartons and alternative packaging: can overall conclusions be drawn? publication-title: Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. doi: 10.1007/s11367-010-0218-x – volume: 23 start-page: 161 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib59 article-title: Sustainable packaging Design : a holistic methodology for packaging design publication-title: Packag. Technol. Sci. doi: 10.1002/pts.887 – year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib60 – volume: 114 start-page: 18 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib39 article-title: Circular economy : to be or not to be in a closed product loop ? A Life Cycle Assessment of aluminium cans with inclusion of alloying elements publication-title: Resour. Conserv. Recycl. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.06.023 – volume: 46 start-page: 4100 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib29 article-title: Limitations of carbon footprint as indicator of environmental sustainability publication-title: Environ. Sci. Technol. doi: 10.1021/es204163f – volume: 18 start-page: 683 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib20 article-title: Identifying best existing practice for characterization modeling in life cycle impact assessment publication-title: Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. doi: 10.1007/s11367-012-0489-5 – volume: 28 start-page: 450 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib46 article-title: On the use of college students in social science research: insights from a second-order meta-analysis publication-title: J. Consum. Res. doi: 10.1086/323732 – volume: 1 start-page: 613 issue: 9 year: 1992 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib4 article-title: An “intelligent product system” to replace “waste management publication-title: Fresenius Environ. Bull. – volume: 172 start-page: 1646 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib52 article-title: Consumers' climate-impact estimations of different food products publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.140 – start-page: 271 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib28 article-title: Normalization doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9744-3_14 – volume: 18 start-page: 673 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib51 article-title: Significance of the use of non-renewable fossil CED as proxy indicator for screening LCA in the beverage packaging sector publication-title: Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. doi: 10.1007/s11367-012-0484-x – year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib7 – year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib71 – year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib1a – year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib9 – volume: 162 start-page: 286 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib56 article-title: Consumer response to packaging design: the role of packaging materials and graphics in sustainability perceptions and product evaluations publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.036 – year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib12 – volume: 5 start-page: 253 year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib62 article-title: Consumer perceptions of, and preferences for, beverage containers publication-title: Food Qual. Prefer. doi: 10.1016/0950-3293(94)90050-7 – volume: 15 start-page: 608 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib65 article-title: PIQET: the design and development of an online “streamlined” LCA tool for sustainable packaging design decision support publication-title: Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. doi: 10.1007/s11367-010-0193-2 – volume: 20 start-page: 882 issue: 4 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib41 article-title: The impact of sustainability information on consumer decision making publication-title: J. Ind. Ecol. doi: 10.1111/jiec.12310 – year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib14 – volume: 133 start-page: 65 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib36 article-title: Sustainable user innovation from a policy perspective : a systematic literature review publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.092 – volume: 23 start-page: 100 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib3 article-title: Consumer perceptions of product packaging publication-title: J. Consum. Market. doi: 10.1108/07363760610655032 – volume: 143 start-page: 1233 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib25 article-title: The bunch of sustainability labels – do consumers differentiate? publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.171 – year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib66 – volume: 1–14 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib23 article-title: How to treat uncertainties in life cycle assessment studies? publication-title: Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. – year: 1988 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib40 – volume: 127 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib57 article-title: Environmental screening of novel technologies to increase material circularity: a case study on aluminium cans publication-title: Resour. Conserv. Recycl. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.013 – year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib24 – volume: 14 start-page: 70 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib6 article-title: Environmental evaluation of aluminium cans for beverages in the German context publication-title: Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. doi: 10.1007/s11367-008-0057-1 – volume: 103 start-page: 357 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib44 article-title: The carbon footprint and energy consumption of beverage packaging selection and disposal publication-title: J. Food Eng. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.11.005 – volume: 35 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib18 article-title: Circular economy, permanent materials and limitations to recycling: where do we stand and what is the way forward? publication-title: Waste Manag. Res. – year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib42 – volume: 30 start-page: 443 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib5 article-title: Realizing product-packaging combinations in circular systems: shaping the research agenda publication-title: Packag. Technol. Sci. doi: 10.1002/pts.2219 – volume: 103 start-page: 58 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib33 article-title: Factors affecting consumers' choices concerning sustainable packaging during product purchase and recycling publication-title: Resour. Conserv. Recycl. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.07.012 – volume: 68 start-page: 2490 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib49 article-title: Theories of practice - new inspiration for ecological economic studies on consumption publication-title: Ecol. Econ. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.015 – year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib35 – year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib32 article-title: Consumer perceptions of food packaging: contributing to or counteracting environmentally sustainable development? publication-title: Packag. Technol. Sci. – year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib64 – volume: 170 start-page: 1369 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib67 article-title: Assessment of environmental sustainability perception through item response theory: a case study in Brazil publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.217 – volume: 19 start-page: 2100 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib72 article-title: A comparative study on milk packaging using life cycle assessment: from PA-PE-Al laminate and polyethylene in China publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.06.022 – year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib11 – volume: 171 start-page: 1664 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib74 article-title: Consumers' perception, purchase intention, and willingness to pay for carbon-labeled products: a case study of Chengdu in China publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.143 – volume: 7 start-page: 2818 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib1 article-title: Glass vs. plastic: life cycle assessment of extra-virgin olive oil bottles across global supply chains publication-title: Sustainability doi: 10.3390/su7032818 – volume: 107 start-page: 76 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib34 article-title: Environmental assessment of the milk life cycle: the effect of packaging selection and the variability of milk production data publication-title: J. Environ. Manage. – volume: 172 start-page: 1848 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib17 article-title: Green marketing consumer-level theory review: a compendium of applied theories and further research directions publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.002 – volume: 140 start-page: 305 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib37 article-title: Coupling material circularity indicators and life cycle based indicators: a proposal to advance the assessment of circular economy strategies at the product level publication-title: Resour. Conserv. Recycl. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.002 – year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib47 – volume: 21 start-page: 237 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib48 article-title: Consumers and their behavior: state of the art in behavioral science supporting use phase modeling in LCA and ecodesign publication-title: Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. doi: 10.1007/s11367-015-1016-2 – volume: 147 start-page: 379 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055_bib50 article-title: Consumers' perceptions, preferences and willingness-to-pay for wine with sustainability characteristics: a review publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.118 |
| SSID | ssj0017074 |
| Score | 2.6260428 |
| Snippet | The environmental impact of packaging has already been studied since the early development of the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, and today an... |
| SourceID | proquest crossref elsevier |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 1193 |
| SubjectTerms | beers Beverage containers business enterprises Circular economy consumer attitudes Consumer research Denmark early development Eco-labels ecolabeling environmental impact environmental performance food packaging glass interviews issues and policy life cycle assessment liquids milk olive oil plastics Qualitative interviews soft drinks Survey surveys tomatoes |
| Title | Environmental sustainability of liquid food packaging: Is there a gap between Danish consumers' perception and learnings from life cycle assessment? |
| URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2220886774 |
| Volume | 210 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000456762600108&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVESC databaseName: ScienceDirect database customDbUrl: eissn: 1879-1786 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017074 issn: 0959-6526 databaseCode: AIEXJ dateStart: 19950101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com providerName: Elsevier |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9NAEF6FlgMcEE-15aFFQuIQOcSP9Xq5oBYFEQ4VUouUm7Ve71ZOIyfESdX-D_4O_40Z79pOA6iAxMWKrKyzznwez87O9w0hr1Qsw1wp7clMMC_SLPESo40HyyHhS3CaIsvrZhP8-DiZTMTnXu97w4W5mPGyTC4vxeK_mhrOgbGROvsX5m4vCifgMxgdjmB2OP6R4UcddQ25IA1Bqpi54otZ8XVd5H2DcsawYD6v2xRhYmBcYRSK-wn9M9lVcCEJvarL02uuZl11sWjLYerNB9d64qyybJVZYXRfXcG8-rIV_tyqINwIhOF7stRLLBXLrZZtmyOYa5cgOsEN_aNkg7h25JpmF-dFt7eiLWsHHZXczGcghSrwXGVrnWRriDZdVVOTrYxZ4FSzra9OuPB87pS0nTMP3KWsO_Z9237Rvdr9oFY3-Pm1YTMY08EU7hhuFiv-kgGKu1oJ4S1F7hOcDU4G3GEYMRbeIrsBZwKc6u7heDT51G5j8aGVAW9m31HI3vzyx34XHG2FCXXsc3qf3HO2oocWbA9IT5cPyd0NKctH5Ns12NHrsKNzQy3sKMKOtrB7S8cVrUFHJQXQUQc6akFHW9C9ph3kKECOtpCjCDmKkKM15GgHuXePyZcPo9P3Hz3X8cNTUcRXXsAkhItZlvgxy8GLJEYxbiBEj_KcxyhlKXMjtK_zKGFZnmWojqQFBLUhi0NfhU_ITjkv9R6hgRRGSqOHgVJRHPgZ5zzMAz00ciiUCfZJ1PzVqXJy-NiVZZY2dY_T1FkoRQvBUjkFC-2TQTtsYfVgbhqQNHZMXVBrg9UUwHfT0JeN3VNw-riTB4_jfF2lENRDdBDD0u3g3y__lNzpnr9nZGe1XOvn5La6WBXV8oWD8g__KNvX |
| linkProvider | Elsevier |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental+sustainability+of+liquid+food+packaging%3A+Is+there+a+gap+between+Danish+consumers%27+perception+and+learnings+from+life+cycle+assessment%3F&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+cleaner+production&rft.au=Boesen%2C+S%C3%B8ren&rft.au=Bey%2C+Niki&rft.au=Niero%2C+Monia&rft.date=2019-02-10&rft.pub=Elsevier+Ltd&rft.issn=0959-6526&rft.eissn=1879-1786&rft.volume=210&rft.spage=1193&rft.epage=1206&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.jclepro.2018.11.055&rft.externalDocID=S0959652618334553 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0959-6526&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0959-6526&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0959-6526&client=summon |