Half-Earth or Whole Earth? Radical ideas for conservation, and their implications

We question whether the increasingly popular, radical idea of turning half the Earth into a network of protected areas is either feasible or just. We argue that this Half-Earth plan would have widespread negative consequences for human populations and would not meet its conservation objectives. It o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Oryx Vol. 51; no. 3; pp. 407 - 410
Main Authors: Büscher, Bram, Fletcher, Robert, Brockington, Dan, Sandbrook, Chris, Adams, William M., Campbell, Lisa, Corson, Catherine, Dressler, Wolfram, Duffy, Rosaleen, Gray, Noella, Holmes, George, Kelly, Alice, Lunstrum, Elizabeth, Ramutsindela, Maano, Shanker, Kartik
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.07.2017
Subjects:
Biodiversity
Biodiversity loss
Colleges & universities
conservation areas
Conservation biology
Earth
Economics
economy
Feasibility
Forum
Geography
Global economy
Half-Earth
human population
Human populations
humans
inequality
Populations
protected area
Protected areas
Science
Social impact
Sociology
Wildlife conservation
United Kingdom > UK
South Africa
inequality
protected area
economy
Half-Earth
Biodiversity
ISSN:0030-6053, 1365-3008, 1365-3008
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We question whether the increasingly popular, radical idea of turning half the Earth into a network of protected areas is either feasible or just. We argue that this Half-Earth plan would have widespread negative consequences for human populations and would not meet its conservation objectives. It offers no agenda for managing biodiversity within a human half of Earth. We call instead for alternative radical action that is both more effective and more equitable, focused directly on the main drivers of biodiversity loss by shifting the global economy from its current foundation in growth while simultaneously redressing inequality.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0030-6053
1365-3008
1365-3008
DOI:10.1017/S0030605316001228