Inter‐subject alignment of MEG datasets in a common representational space

Pooling neural imaging data across subjects requires aligning recordings from different subjects. In magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings, sensors across subjects are poorly correlated both because of differences in the exact location of the sensors, and structural and functional differences in t...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Human brain mapping Ročník 38; číslo 9; s. 4287 - 4301
Hlavní autoři: Zhang, Qiong, Borst, Jelmer P., Kass, Robert E., Anderson, John R.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: United States John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.09.2017
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Témata:
ISSN:1065-9471, 1097-0193, 1097-0193
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Pooling neural imaging data across subjects requires aligning recordings from different subjects. In magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings, sensors across subjects are poorly correlated both because of differences in the exact location of the sensors, and structural and functional differences in the brains. It is possible to achieve alignment by assuming that the same regions of different brains correspond across subjects. However, this relies on both the assumption that brain anatomy and function are well correlated, and the strong assumptions that go into solving the under‐determined inverse problem given the high‐dimensional source space. In this article, we investigated an alternative method that bypasses source‐localization. Instead, it analyzes the sensor recordings themselves and aligns their temporal signatures across subjects. We used a multivariate approach, multiset canonical correlation analysis (M‐CCA), to transform individual subject data to a low‐dimensional common representational space. We evaluated the robustness of this approach over a synthetic dataset, by examining the effect of different factors that add to the noise and individual differences in the data. On an MEG dataset, we demonstrated that M‐CCA performs better than a method that assumes perfect sensor correspondence and a method that applies source localization. Last, we described how the standard M‐CCA algorithm could be further improved with a regularization term that incorporates spatial sensor information. Hum Brain Mapp 38:4287–4301, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1065-9471
1097-0193
1097-0193
DOI:10.1002/hbm.23689