Shared decision‐making for older adults with cardiovascular disease

Shared decision‐making is appropriate for clinical decisions involving multiple reasonable options, which occur frequently in the cardiovascular care of older adults. The process includes the communication of relevant factual information between the patient and the clinician, elicitation of patient...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Clinical cardiology (Mahwah, N.J.) Ročník 43; číslo 2; s. 196 - 204
Hlavní autori: Backman, Warren D., Levine, Sharon A., Wenger, Nanette K., Harold, John Gordon
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: New York Wiley Periodicals, Inc 01.02.2020
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Predmet:
ISSN:0160-9289, 1932-8737, 1932-8737
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:Shared decision‐making is appropriate for clinical decisions involving multiple reasonable options, which occur frequently in the cardiovascular care of older adults. The process includes the communication of relevant factual information between the patient and the clinician, elicitation of patient preferences, and a mutual agreement on the best course of action to meet the patient's personal goals. For older adults, there are common challenges and considerations with regard to shared decision‐making, some of which (eg, cognitive impairment) may be biologically linked to cardiovascular disease. There are tools designed to facilitate the shared decision‐making process, known as decision aids, which are broadly effective although have shortcomings when applied to older adults. Novel approaches in clinical research and health systems changes will go some way toward improving shared decision‐making for older adults, but the greatest scope for improvement may be within the grass roots areas of communication skills, interdisciplinary teamwork, and simply asking our patients what matters most.
Bibliografia:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0160-9289
1932-8737
1932-8737
DOI:10.1002/clc.23267