Skin measurement devices to assess skin quality: A systematic review on reliability and validity

Background Many treatments aim to slow down or reverse the visible signs of skin aging and thereby improve skin quality. Measurement devices are frequently employed to measure the effects of these treatments to improve skin quality, for example, skin elasticity, color, and texture. However, it remai...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Skin research and technology Ročník 28; číslo 2; s. 212 - 224
Hlavní autoři: Langeveld, Mirte, Lande, Lara S., O’ Sullivan, Eimear, Lei, Berend, Dongen, Joris A.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: England John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.03.2022
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Témata:
Aging
Color
Devices
Elasticity
Evaluation
facial surgery
Humans
measurement tools
Measuring instruments
Original
plastic surgery
Quality assessment
Reliability analysis
Reproducibility of Results
Search engines
Skin
Skin Aging
Skin Pigmentation
skin quality
skin rejuvenation
systematic review
Texture
Validation studies
Validity
measurement tools
plastic surgery
systematic review
skin quality
skin rejuvenation
facial surgery
ISSN:0909-752X, 1600-0846, 1600-0846
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Background Many treatments aim to slow down or reverse the visible signs of skin aging and thereby improve skin quality. Measurement devices are frequently employed to measure the effects of these treatments to improve skin quality, for example, skin elasticity, color, and texture. However, it remains unknown which of these devices is most reliable and valid. Materials and methods MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched. Instruments were scored on reporting construct validity by means of convergent validity, interobserver, intraobserver, and interinstrument reliability. Results For the evaluation of skin color, 11 studies were included describing 16 measurement devices, analyzing 3172 subjects. The most reliable device for skin color assessment is the Minolta Chromameter CR‐300 due to good interobserver, intraobserver, and interinstrument reliability. For skin elasticity, seven studies assessed nine types of devices analyzing 290 subjects in total. No intra and interobserver reliability was reported. Skin texture was assessed in two studies evaluating 72 subjects using three different types of measurement devices. The PRIMOS device reported excellent intra and interobserver reliability. None of the included reviewed devices could be determined to be valid based on construct validity. Conclusion The most reliable devices to evaluate skin color and texture in ordinary skin were, respectively, the Minolta Chromameter and PRIMOS. No reliable device is available to measure skin elasticity in ordinary skin and none of the included devices could be determined to be designated as valid.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-3
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0909-752X
1600-0846
1600-0846
DOI:10.1111/srt.13113