Skin measurement devices to assess skin quality: A systematic review on reliability and validity

Background Many treatments aim to slow down or reverse the visible signs of skin aging and thereby improve skin quality. Measurement devices are frequently employed to measure the effects of these treatments to improve skin quality, for example, skin elasticity, color, and texture. However, it remai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Skin research and technology Vol. 28; no. 2; pp. 212 - 224
Main Authors: Langeveld, Mirte, Lande, Lara S., O’ Sullivan, Eimear, Lei, Berend, Dongen, Joris A.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.03.2022
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects:
ISSN:0909-752X, 1600-0846, 1600-0846
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Background Many treatments aim to slow down or reverse the visible signs of skin aging and thereby improve skin quality. Measurement devices are frequently employed to measure the effects of these treatments to improve skin quality, for example, skin elasticity, color, and texture. However, it remains unknown which of these devices is most reliable and valid. Materials and methods MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched. Instruments were scored on reporting construct validity by means of convergent validity, interobserver, intraobserver, and interinstrument reliability. Results For the evaluation of skin color, 11 studies were included describing 16 measurement devices, analyzing 3172 subjects. The most reliable device for skin color assessment is the Minolta Chromameter CR‐300 due to good interobserver, intraobserver, and interinstrument reliability. For skin elasticity, seven studies assessed nine types of devices analyzing 290 subjects in total. No intra and interobserver reliability was reported. Skin texture was assessed in two studies evaluating 72 subjects using three different types of measurement devices. The PRIMOS device reported excellent intra and interobserver reliability. None of the included reviewed devices could be determined to be valid based on construct validity. Conclusion The most reliable devices to evaluate skin color and texture in ordinary skin were, respectively, the Minolta Chromameter and PRIMOS. No reliable device is available to measure skin elasticity in ordinary skin and none of the included devices could be determined to be designated as valid.
AbstractList Many treatments aim to slow down or reverse the visible signs of skin aging and thereby improve skin quality. Measurement devices are frequently employed to measure the effects of these treatments to improve skin quality, for example, skin elasticity, color, and texture. However, it remains unknown which of these devices is most reliable and valid. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched. Instruments were scored on reporting construct validity by means of convergent validity, interobserver, intraobserver, and interinstrument reliability. For the evaluation of skin color, 11 studies were included describing 16 measurement devices, analyzing 3172 subjects. The most reliable device for skin color assessment is the Minolta Chromameter CR-300 due to good interobserver, intraobserver, and interinstrument reliability. For skin elasticity, seven studies assessed nine types of devices analyzing 290 subjects in total. No intra and interobserver reliability was reported. Skin texture was assessed in two studies evaluating 72 subjects using three different types of measurement devices. The PRIMOS device reported excellent intra and interobserver reliability. None of the included reviewed devices could be determined to be valid based on construct validity. The most reliable devices to evaluate skin color and texture in ordinary skin were, respectively, the Minolta Chromameter and PRIMOS. No reliable device is available to measure skin elasticity in ordinary skin and none of the included devices could be determined to be designated as valid.
Background Many treatments aim to slow down or reverse the visible signs of skin aging and thereby improve skin quality. Measurement devices are frequently employed to measure the effects of these treatments to improve skin quality, for example, skin elasticity, color, and texture. However, it remains unknown which of these devices is most reliable and valid. Materials and methods MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched. Instruments were scored on reporting construct validity by means of convergent validity, interobserver, intraobserver, and interinstrument reliability. Results For the evaluation of skin color, 11 studies were included describing 16 measurement devices, analyzing 3172 subjects. The most reliable device for skin color assessment is the Minolta Chromameter CR‐300 due to good interobserver, intraobserver, and interinstrument reliability. For skin elasticity, seven studies assessed nine types of devices analyzing 290 subjects in total. No intra and interobserver reliability was reported. Skin texture was assessed in two studies evaluating 72 subjects using three different types of measurement devices. The PRIMOS device reported excellent intra and interobserver reliability. None of the included reviewed devices could be determined to be valid based on construct validity. Conclusion The most reliable devices to evaluate skin color and texture in ordinary skin were, respectively, the Minolta Chromameter and PRIMOS. No reliable device is available to measure skin elasticity in ordinary skin and none of the included devices could be determined to be designated as valid.
Background Many treatments aim to slow down or reverse the visible signs of skin aging and thereby improve skin quality. Measurement devices are frequently employed to measure the effects of these treatments to improve skin quality, for example, skin elasticity, color, and texture. However, it remains unknown which of these devices is most reliable and valid. Materials and methods MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched. Instruments were scored on reporting construct validity by means of convergent validity, interobserver, intraobserver, and interinstrument reliability. Results For the evaluation of skin color, 11 studies were included describing 16 measurement devices, analyzing 3172 subjects. The most reliable device for skin color assessment is the Minolta Chromameter CR‐300 due to good interobserver, intraobserver, and interinstrument reliability. For skin elasticity, seven studies assessed nine types of devices analyzing 290 subjects in total. No intra and interobserver reliability was reported. Skin texture was assessed in two studies evaluating 72 subjects using three different types of measurement devices. The PRIMOS device reported excellent intra and interobserver reliability. None of the included reviewed devices could be determined to be valid based on construct validity. Conclusion The most reliable devices to evaluate skin color and texture in ordinary skin were, respectively, the Minolta Chromameter and PRIMOS. No reliable device is available to measure skin elasticity in ordinary skin and none of the included devices could be determined to be designated as valid.
Many treatments aim to slow down or reverse the visible signs of skin aging and thereby improve skin quality. Measurement devices are frequently employed to measure the effects of these treatments to improve skin quality, for example, skin elasticity, color, and texture. However, it remains unknown which of these devices is most reliable and valid.BACKGROUNDMany treatments aim to slow down or reverse the visible signs of skin aging and thereby improve skin quality. Measurement devices are frequently employed to measure the effects of these treatments to improve skin quality, for example, skin elasticity, color, and texture. However, it remains unknown which of these devices is most reliable and valid.MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched. Instruments were scored on reporting construct validity by means of convergent validity, interobserver, intraobserver, and interinstrument reliability.MATERIALS AND METHODSMEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched. Instruments were scored on reporting construct validity by means of convergent validity, interobserver, intraobserver, and interinstrument reliability.For the evaluation of skin color, 11 studies were included describing 16 measurement devices, analyzing 3172 subjects. The most reliable device for skin color assessment is the Minolta Chromameter CR-300 due to good interobserver, intraobserver, and interinstrument reliability. For skin elasticity, seven studies assessed nine types of devices analyzing 290 subjects in total. No intra and interobserver reliability was reported. Skin texture was assessed in two studies evaluating 72 subjects using three different types of measurement devices. The PRIMOS device reported excellent intra and interobserver reliability. None of the included reviewed devices could be determined to be valid based on construct validity.RESULTSFor the evaluation of skin color, 11 studies were included describing 16 measurement devices, analyzing 3172 subjects. The most reliable device for skin color assessment is the Minolta Chromameter CR-300 due to good interobserver, intraobserver, and interinstrument reliability. For skin elasticity, seven studies assessed nine types of devices analyzing 290 subjects in total. No intra and interobserver reliability was reported. Skin texture was assessed in two studies evaluating 72 subjects using three different types of measurement devices. The PRIMOS device reported excellent intra and interobserver reliability. None of the included reviewed devices could be determined to be valid based on construct validity.The most reliable devices to evaluate skin color and texture in ordinary skin were, respectively, the Minolta Chromameter and PRIMOS. No reliable device is available to measure skin elasticity in ordinary skin and none of the included devices could be determined to be designated as valid.CONCLUSIONThe most reliable devices to evaluate skin color and texture in ordinary skin were, respectively, the Minolta Chromameter and PRIMOS. No reliable device is available to measure skin elasticity in ordinary skin and none of the included devices could be determined to be designated as valid.
Author Dongen, Joris A.
Langeveld, Mirte
Lande, Lara S.
O’ Sullivan, Eimear
Lei, Berend
AuthorAffiliation 4 Department of Plastic Surgery University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht the Netherlands
3 Department of Plastic Surgery University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen Groningen the Netherlands
1 Medical Faculty Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam the Netherlands
2 Craniofacial Unit Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children and UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health London UK
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 2 Craniofacial Unit Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children and UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health London UK
– name: 3 Department of Plastic Surgery University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen Groningen the Netherlands
– name: 1 Medical Faculty Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam the Netherlands
– name: 4 Department of Plastic Surgery University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht the Netherlands
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Mirte
  surname: Langeveld
  fullname: Langeveld, Mirte
  organization: Erasmus University Medical Center
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Lara S.
  surname: Lande
  fullname: Lande, Lara S.
  organization: Craniofacial Unit Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children and UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Eimear
  surname: O’ Sullivan
  fullname: O’ Sullivan, Eimear
  organization: Craniofacial Unit Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children and UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Berend
  surname: Lei
  fullname: Lei, Berend
  organization: University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Joris A.
  surname: Dongen
  fullname: Dongen, Joris A.
  email: jorisavandongen@gmail.com
  organization: University Medical Center Utrecht
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34751474$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kVtrFTEUhYNU7Gn1wT8gAV_sw7S5zSU-CKXUCxQEW8G3mMns0dSZpM2eOeX8ezM9tdiC5mUn7G8v9sraIzshBiDkJWeHPJ8jTNMhl5zLJ2TFK8YK1qhqh6yYZrqoS_Ftl-whXjLGSs3lM7IrVV1yVasV-X7-ywc6gsU5wQhhoh2svQOkU6QWERApLsj1bAc_bd7SY4obnGC0k3c0ZRhuaAz5Nnjb-oWhNnR0nfEuP56Tp70dEF7c1X3y9f3pxcnH4uzzh08nx2eFU0rKQjkGHLRudS-EkK7hTaVaxlznlONt07Oy7FmtdA_O1gqAQSO6ptV12zjbcblP3m11r-Z2hM5lK8kO5ir50aaNidabh53gf5ofcW200FqIReDNnUCK1zPgZEaPDobBBogzGlHqsqwarhf09SP0Ms4pZHtGVIrXshJVnalXf290v8qfz8_AwRZwKSIm6O8RzswSrMnBmttgM3v0iHV-yhHExYwf_jdx4wfY_FvanH-52E78Bpyntj0
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jaad_2024_01_067
crossref_primary_10_1111_jocd_70371
crossref_primary_10_1590_s1519_994020220013
crossref_primary_10_1093_asjof_ojae038
crossref_primary_10_3390_cosmetics11060205
crossref_primary_10_1007_s43681_023_00378_2
crossref_primary_10_1111_jocd_70236
crossref_primary_10_2196_54256
crossref_primary_10_1111_srt_13824
crossref_primary_10_1111_jocd_15620
crossref_primary_10_1002_ppap_202400148
crossref_primary_10_1093_asjof_ojae072
crossref_primary_10_1002_itl2_611
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41443_024_00975_7
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41746_024_01176_8
crossref_primary_10_3390_s25020372
crossref_primary_10_25259_JCAS_78_2025
crossref_primary_10_1111_jocd_16063
crossref_primary_10_1111_srt_13634
crossref_primary_10_3390_bios12100861
crossref_primary_10_17116_klinderma202423031332
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2022_992554
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amjmed_2023_04_001
crossref_primary_10_1111_srt_13335
crossref_primary_10_1111_srt_13532
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2024_1353605
crossref_primary_10_1038_s43856_024_00550_7
crossref_primary_10_1145_3729474
crossref_primary_10_1097_GOX_0000000000006838
crossref_primary_10_1111_srt_13201
crossref_primary_10_1002_der2_154
crossref_primary_10_1093_asj_sjae120
crossref_primary_10_1111_jocd_70290
crossref_primary_10_1364_BOE_571166
Cites_doi 10.1017/S0266462301107038
10.1111/srt.12086
10.1016/s0749‐0690(05)70091‐4
10.1034/j.1600‐0846.2001.007001056.x
10.1111/j.1600‐0846.2009.00359.x
10.1111/srt.12718
10.1111/srt.12134
10.1016/j.burns.2014.01.025
10.1111/srt.12596
10.5114/pdia.2015.48037
10.1034/j.1600‐0846.2001.007001024.x
10.1016/j.jaad.2010.03.006
10.1111/srt.12009
10.1016/s0749‐0690(05)70089‐6
10.1056/NEJM199711133372003
10.5114/ada.2018.81144
10.1111/j.1365‐2133.1984.tb14149.x
10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00708.x
10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.0018
10.1002/(SICI)1096‐8644(200005)112
10.1111/srt.12013
10.1111/j.1600‐0846.2007.00224.x
10.1111/php.12607
10.1111/srt.12199
10.1016/j.micron.2003.11.002
10.1097/PRS.0000000000006147
10.1111/srt.12109
10.7326/0003‐4819‐151‐4‐200908180‐00135
10.1097/BCR.0b013e318264bf7d
10.1001/archderm.124.6.869
10.1002/lsm.21147
10.1111/j.1365‐2133.2010.09639.x
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
2021 The Authors. Skin Research and Technology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
– notice: 2021 The Authors. Skin Research and Technology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
– notice: 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID 24P
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7QO
7X7
7XB
8FD
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
BENPR
CCPQU
FR3
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
M0S
P64
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1111/srt.13113
DatabaseName Wiley Online Library Open Access Titles
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Technology Research Database
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
Engineering Research Database
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic (retired)
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Technology Research Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic (New)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE

Technology Research Database
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: 24P
  name: Wiley Open Access
  url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Engineering
DocumentTitleAlternate LANGEVELD et al
EISSN 1600-0846
EndPage 224
ExternalDocumentID PMC9299221
34751474
10_1111_srt_13113
SRT13113
Genre article
Systematic Review
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
123
1OB
1OC
24P
31~
33P
36B
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
702
7PT
7X7
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8FI
8FJ
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AAKAS
AANHP
AAONW
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABDBF
ABEML
ABJNI
ABPVW
ABUWG
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCMX
ACGFS
ACIWK
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACUHS
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADEOM
ADIYS
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADPDF
ADXAS
ADZCM
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEGXH
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFGKR
AFKRA
AFPWT
AFRAH
AFZJQ
AHEFC
AHMBA
AIACR
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BENPR
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CS3
CYRXZ
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DC6
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
EAD
EAP
EBC
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
EX3
F00
F01
F04
FEDTE
FUBAC
FYUFA
FZ0
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.X
HF~
HMCUK
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
K48
KBYEO
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
OK1
OVD
OVEED
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PALCI
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RPM
RX1
SAMSI
SUPJJ
SV3
TEORI
TUS
UB1
UKHRP
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WOHZO
WOW
WQJ
WRC
WUP
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
XG1
YFH
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
AAMMB
AAYXX
AEFGJ
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
AIQQE
CITATION
O8X
PHGZM
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7QO
7XB
8FD
8FK
FR3
K9.
P64
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4433-4c0e1e99b9f2223c81864b00cdc4c1b8f055f0749feca74ee0e82d8b97b8cad13
IEDL.DBID 24P
ISICitedReferencesCount 32
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000715875400001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0909-752X
1600-0846
IngestDate Tue Nov 04 01:51:16 EST 2025
Sun Nov 09 11:07:32 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 14:44:29 EST 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:25:59 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 02:17:36 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 21:44:32 EST 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:25:02 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords measurement tools
plastic surgery
systematic review
skin quality
skin rejuvenation
facial surgery
Language English
License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
2021 The Authors. Skin Research and Technology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4433-4c0e1e99b9f2223c81864b00cdc4c1b8f055f0749feca74ee0e82d8b97b8cad13
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-3
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
OpenAccessLink https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fsrt.13113
PMID 34751474
PQID 2641736267
PQPubID 1106343
PageCount 13
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9299221
proquest_miscellaneous_2595568191
proquest_journals_2641736267
pubmed_primary_34751474
crossref_primary_10_1111_srt_13113
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_srt_13113
wiley_primary_10_1111_srt_13113_SRT13113
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate March 2022
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-03-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2022
  text: March 2022
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: Copenhagen
– name: Hoboken
PublicationTitle Skin research and technology
PublicationTitleAlternate Skin Res Technol
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Publisher_xml – name: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
– name: John Wiley and Sons Inc
References 1997; 337
1988; 124
2020; 37
2010; 162
2009; 151
2003
2016; 92
2000; 112
2014; 40
2019; 144
2007; 13
2016; 33
2014; 20
2013; 19
2009; 10
2001; 7
2020
2013; 34
1984; 111
2004; 35
2015; 21
2019; 25
2011; 64
2001; 17
2012; 44
2016; 9
2009; 15
2016; 152
e_1_2_8_28_1
e_1_2_8_29_1
e_1_2_8_24_1
e_1_2_8_25_1
OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group (e_1_2_8_14_1) 2020
e_1_2_8_26_1
e_1_2_8_27_1
e_1_2_8_2_1
Freedberg IM (e_1_2_8_7_1) 2003
e_1_2_8_5_1
e_1_2_8_4_1
Rosso JD (e_1_2_8_3_1) 2016; 9
e_1_2_8_6_1
e_1_2_8_9_1
e_1_2_8_8_1
e_1_2_8_20_1
e_1_2_8_21_1
e_1_2_8_22_1
e_1_2_8_23_1
e_1_2_8_17_1
e_1_2_8_18_1
e_1_2_8_19_1
e_1_2_8_13_1
e_1_2_8_36_1
e_1_2_8_35_1
e_1_2_8_15_1
e_1_2_8_16_1
e_1_2_8_32_1
e_1_2_8_10_1
e_1_2_8_31_1
e_1_2_8_11_1
e_1_2_8_34_1
e_1_2_8_12_1
e_1_2_8_33_1
e_1_2_8_30_1
References_xml – volume: 25
  start-page: 787
  issue: 6
  year: 2019
  end-page: 92
  article-title: The inter‐rater and test‐retest reliability of skin thickness and skin elasticity measurements by the DermaLab Combo in healthy participants
  publication-title: Skin Res Technol
– volume: 19
  start-page: 84
  issue: 2
  year: 2013
  end-page: 90
  article-title: Comparison of two in vivo measurements for skin surface topography
  publication-title: Skin Res Technol
– volume: 19
  start-page: 100
  issue: 2
  year: 2013
  end-page: 6
  article-title: Assessing skin pigmentation in epidemiological studies: the reliability of measurements under different conditions
  publication-title: Skin Res Technol
– volume: 17
  start-page: 617
  issue: 4
  year: 2001
  end-page: 30
  article-title: Skin aging: postulated mechanisms and consequent changes in structure and function
  publication-title: Clin Geriatr Med
– volume: 20
  start-page: 74
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  end-page: 80
  article-title: Comparison of two series of non‐invasive instruments used for the skin physiological properties measurements: the ‘Soft Plus’ from Callegari S.p.A vs. the series of detectors from Courage & Khazaka
  publication-title: Skin Res Technol
– volume: 25
  start-page: 60
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  end-page: 7
  article-title: A novel method to measure skin mechanical properties with three‐dimensional digital image correlation
  publication-title: Skin Res Technol
– year: 2003
– volume: 40
  start-page: 1521
  issue: 8
  year: 2014
  end-page: 9
  article-title: Reliability of scar assessments performed with an integrated skin testing device — the DermaLab Combo((R))
  publication-title: Burns
– volume: 152
  start-page: 443
  issue: 4
  year: 2016
  end-page: 51
  article-title: Development and psychometric validation of the FACE‐Q skin, lips, and facial rhytids appearance scales and adverse effects checklists for cosmetic procedures
  publication-title: JAMA Dermatol
– volume: 92
  start-page: 632
  issue: 4
  year: 2016
  end-page: 6
  article-title: Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy versus Mexameter((R)) MX18 measurements of melanin and erythema in an African population
  publication-title: Photochem Photobiol
– volume: 151
  start-page: 264
  issue: 4
  year: 2009
  end-page: 9
  article-title: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses: the PRISMA statement
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
– volume: 17
  start-page: 643
  issue: 4
  year: 2001
  end-page: 59
  article-title: Photoaging: pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment
  publication-title: Clin Geriatr Med
– volume: 124
  start-page: 869
  issue: 6
  year: 1988
  end-page: 71
  article-title: The validity and practicality of sun‐reactive skin types I through VI
  publication-title: Arch Dermatol
– volume: 20
  start-page: 422
  issue: 4
  year: 2014
  end-page: 8
  article-title: Comparison of skin elasticity test results from the Ballistometer((R)) and Cutometer((R))
  publication-title: Skin Res Technol
– volume: 13
  start-page: 280
  issue: 3
  year: 2007
  end-page: 4
  article-title: Correlation between a Cutometer and quantitative evaluation using Moire topography in age‐related skin elasticity
  publication-title: Skin Res Technol
– volume: 21
  start-page: 346
  issue: 3
  year: 2015
  end-page: 62
  article-title: Skin colour, skin redness and melanin biometric measurements: comparison study between Antera((R)) 3D, Mexameter((R)) and Colorimeter((R))
  publication-title: Skin Res Technol
– volume: 7
  start-page: 56
  issue: 1
  year: 2001
  end-page: 9
  article-title: Reproducibility of repeated measurements on healthy skin with Minolta Chromameter CR‐300
  publication-title: Skin Res Technol
– volume: 20
  start-page: 218
  issue: 2
  year: 2014
  end-page: 27
  article-title: Discrimination between cutaneous pigmentation and erythema: comparison of the skin colorimeters Dermacatch and Mexameter
  publication-title: Skin Res Technol
– volume: 33
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2016
  end-page: 5
  article-title: Structural and biophysical characteristics of human skin in maintaining proper epidermal barrier function
  publication-title: Postepy Dermatol Alergol
– volume: 337
  start-page: 1419
  issue: 20
  year: 1997
  end-page: 29
  article-title: Pathophysiology of premature skin aging induced by ultraviolet light
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
– volume: 15
  start-page: 224
  issue: 2
  year: 2009
  end-page: 9
  article-title: An innovative method to measure skin pigmentation
  publication-title: Skin Res Technol
– volume: 9
  start-page: S2
  year: 2016
  end-page: 8
  article-title: Understanding the epidermal barrier in healthy and compromised skin: clinically relevant information for the dermatology practitioner: Proceedings of an Expert Panel Roundtable Meeting
  publication-title: J Clin Aesthet Dermatol
– year: 2020
– volume: 44
  start-page: 131
  issue: 2
  year: 2012
  end-page: 42
  article-title: The use of non‐invasive instruments in characterizing human facial and abdominal skin
  publication-title: Lasers Surg Med
– volume: 144
  start-page: 784e
  issue: 5
  year: 2019
  end-page: 97e
  article-title: The effects of facial lipografting on skin quality: a systematic review
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
– volume: 37
  start-page: 371
  issue: 3
  year: 2020
  end-page: 6
  article-title: Intra‐rater reproducibility of shear wave elastography in the evaluation of facial skin
  publication-title: Postepy Dermatol Alergol
– volume: 34
  start-page: e187
  issue: 3
  year: 2013
  end-page: 94
  article-title: Objective color measurements: clinimetric performance of three devices on normal skin and scar tissue
  publication-title: J Burn Care Res
– volume: 7
  start-page: 24
  issue: 1
  year: 2001
  end-page: 31
  article-title: The Visi‐Chroma VC‐100: a new imaging colorimeter for dermatocosmetic research
  publication-title: Skin Res Technol
– volume: 111
  start-page: 663
  issue: 6
  year: 1984
  end-page: 72
  article-title: A portable instrument for quantifying erythema induced by ultraviolet radiation
  publication-title: Br J Dermatol
– volume: 112
  start-page: 17
  issue: 1
  year: 2000
  end-page: 27
  article-title: Comparison of narrow‐band reflectance spectroscopy and tristimulus colorimetry for measurements of skin and hair color in persons of different biological ancestry
  publication-title: Am J Phys Anthropol
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1229
  issue: 7
  year: 2009
  end-page: 36
  article-title: Modulation of neuropathic pain by a glial‐derived factor
  publication-title: Pain Med
– volume: 64
  start-page: 706
  issue: 4
  year: 2011
  end-page: 15
  article-title: An objective device for measuring surface roughness of skin and scars
  publication-title: J Am Acad Dermatol
– volume: 35
  start-page: 155
  issue: 3
  year: 2004
  end-page: 9
  article-title: The role of telomeres in skin aging/photoaging
  publication-title: Micron
– volume: 162
  start-page: 724
  issue: 4
  year: 2010
  end-page: 31
  article-title: Measurement of skin texture through polarization imaging
  publication-title: Br J Dermatol
– volume: 17
  start-page: 479
  issue: 4
  year: 2001
  end-page: 87
  article-title: Reproducibility and responsiveness of evaluative outcome measures. Theoretical considerations illustrated by an empirical example
  publication-title: Int J Technol Assess Health Care
– ident: e_1_2_8_35_1
  doi: 10.1017/S0266462301107038
– ident: e_1_2_8_18_1
  doi: 10.1111/srt.12086
– ident: e_1_2_8_8_1
  doi: 10.1016/s0749‐0690(05)70091‐4
– ident: e_1_2_8_22_1
  doi: 10.1034/j.1600‐0846.2001.007001056.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_31_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0846.2009.00359.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_24_1
  doi: 10.1111/srt.12718
– ident: e_1_2_8_11_1
  doi: 10.1111/srt.12134
– ident: e_1_2_8_19_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2014.01.025
– ident: e_1_2_8_25_1
  doi: 10.1111/srt.12596
– ident: e_1_2_8_2_1
  doi: 10.5114/pdia.2015.48037
– ident: e_1_2_8_21_1
  doi: 10.1034/j.1600‐0846.2001.007001024.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_29_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.03.006
– ident: e_1_2_8_28_1
  doi: 10.1111/srt.12009
– ident: e_1_2_8_4_1
  doi: 10.1016/s0749‐0690(05)70089‐6
– ident: e_1_2_8_6_1
  doi: 10.1056/NEJM199711133372003
– volume-title: The Oxford Levels of Evidence 2
  year: 2020
  ident: e_1_2_8_14_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_30_1
  doi: 10.5114/ada.2018.81144
– ident: e_1_2_8_32_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365‐2133.1984.tb14149.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_33_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00708.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_36_1
  doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.0018
– volume-title: Fitzpatrick's dermatology in general medicine
  year: 2003
  ident: e_1_2_8_7_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_23_1
  doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096‐8644(200005)112
– ident: e_1_2_8_10_1
  doi: 10.1111/srt.12013
– volume: 9
  start-page: S2
  year: 2016
  ident: e_1_2_8_3_1
  article-title: Understanding the epidermal barrier in healthy and compromised skin: clinically relevant information for the dermatology practitioner: Proceedings of an Expert Panel Roundtable Meeting
  publication-title: J Clin Aesthet Dermatol
– ident: e_1_2_8_27_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0846.2007.00224.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_15_1
  doi: 10.1111/php.12607
– ident: e_1_2_8_16_1
  doi: 10.1111/srt.12199
– ident: e_1_2_8_5_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2003.11.002
– ident: e_1_2_8_9_1
  doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006147
– ident: e_1_2_8_17_1
  doi: 10.1111/srt.12109
– ident: e_1_2_8_13_1
  doi: 10.7326/0003‐4819‐151‐4‐200908180‐00135
– ident: e_1_2_8_20_1
  doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e318264bf7d
– ident: e_1_2_8_34_1
  doi: 10.1001/archderm.124.6.869
– ident: e_1_2_8_26_1
  doi: 10.1002/lsm.21147
– ident: e_1_2_8_12_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365‐2133.2010.09639.x
SSID ssj0005913
Score 2.4553266
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet Background Many treatments aim to slow down or reverse the visible signs of skin aging and thereby improve skin quality. Measurement devices are frequently...
Many treatments aim to slow down or reverse the visible signs of skin aging and thereby improve skin quality. Measurement devices are frequently employed to...
Background Many treatments aim to slow down or reverse the visible signs of skin aging and thereby improve skin quality. Measurement devices are frequently...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 212
SubjectTerms Aging
Color
Devices
Elasticity
Evaluation
facial surgery
Humans
measurement tools
Measuring instruments
Original
plastic surgery
Quality assessment
Reliability analysis
Reproducibility of Results
Search engines
Skin
Skin Aging
Skin Pigmentation
skin quality
skin rejuvenation
systematic review
Texture
Validation studies
Validity
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: ProQuest Central
  dbid: BENPR
  link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LT9wwEB7RBVVwKI8-SKHIoB64hDqJg2MuCBCIA6wQUGlvwRk76kqQ0M2CxL_Hdry7rIBeenPkURJrHh7PjL8B-IlsNyljZYsYVBqySBZhUcjEHFXKmEqd8LIFcT3j3W7W64kLH3BrfFnlyCY6Q61qtDHyX2bjjrjFTuH7939D2zXKZld9C40PMGuRylgHZg-PuxeXkyIP0TZIFlSEPI17HlvI1vI0g-GOxZpJpnekV27m62rJl16s24ZOFv93AUvwyTug5KCVmGWY0dUKLLyAJVyBj-c-4f4ZbmxzLnI3CSQSpZ1tIcOaSJcwJo0laS9nPu2RAzIBhybtxRhSV2Z0228hwZ-IrBQxAt5X5uEL_D45vj46DX1ThhAZSwwTkepIC1GI0roWaBHxmNFdVMgwKrKSpmlp_BJRapScaU11FqusELzIUKoo-Qqdqq70KpAolUZMZEYLQRkmKBF3GZXGImRKY0oD2B4xJkePWG4bZ9zmo5OL4WHueBjA1pj0voXpeItofcSZ3Gtqk0_YEsDmeNromE2cyErXD4YmFQ6oTUQBfGuFYfyVhHHjc3IWAJ8SkzGBxe-enqn6fxyOt_FMRRybd247gXr_x_Ory2s3-P7vFazBfGxvZ7gSuXXoDAcP-gfM4eOw3ww2vG48A5c0Guw
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Skin measurement devices to assess skin quality: A systematic review on reliability and validity
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fsrt.13113
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34751474
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2641736267
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2595568191
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9299221
Volume 28
WOSCitedRecordID wos000715875400001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1600-0846
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0005913
  issn: 0909-752X
  databaseCode: 7X7
  dateStart: 20220101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Central
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1600-0846
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0005913
  issn: 0909-752X
  databaseCode: BENPR
  dateStart: 20220101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Online Library Full Collection 2020
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1600-0846
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0005913
  issn: 0909-752X
  databaseCode: DRFUL
  dateStart: 19970101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
– providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Open Access
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1600-0846
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0005913
  issn: 0909-752X
  databaseCode: 24P
  dateStart: 20220101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwEB6VFiE48CivQKkM4tBLKidxahtOBbriUFarpZX2FvyKWKnNVpstUv89Yzub3VVBQuLiJPIksewZ-7M9_gbgvWFHRZ1b78Rgy5RlSqdaqwKnKnVOlSt4HUlcT_lwKCYTOdqCj8uzMJEfol9w85YR-mtv4Eq3a0bezheHniumuAM7mAoftyFno5V_h4yxkSWVKS_zSUcr5N14-lc3B6NbCPO2o-Q6gA0j0ODRf5X9MTzsgCc5jpryBLZcswsP1ugId-Het26j_Sn88EG5yOVqAZFYF_oUspgRFTaKSetF4qHMmw_kmKxIoUk8EENmDd5dTCMV-A1RjSWo2FOLD8_gfHBy9vlr2gVjSA1jBTaeoS5zUmpZe0hhPBMeQ5s11jCTaVHTsqwRj8jaGcWZc9SJ3AotuRZG2ax4DtvNrHEvgWSlQvVQgmpJmSmMMuaIUYU9gbDOlDSBg2WrVKZjKvcBMy6q5YwF668K9ZfAu170KtJz_Elob9m0VWehbYVAMOOei4cn8LbPRtvyGyaqcbNrlCllIGiTWQIvoib0fykYR6zJWQJ8Q0d6Ac_bvZnTTH8G_m5EpDLP8ZsHQUf-XvDq-_gs3Lz6d9HXcD_3JzSCm9webC_m1-4N3DW_FtN2vh9MBFM-4SEV-7Dz6WQ4GuP1y3hwfvoby38cCQ
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Lb9QwEB6VgngceLQ8AgUMAqmXtI7j1DESQhVQtep2hWCR9pY6tqOuVJKy2VLtn-pvZOwku10VuPXAzZFHjp18nhnb428A3mi-FRfMuCAGk4Q8UnmY5yrGpUrBqLKxKBoS157o99PhUH5ZgvPuLowLq-x0olfUptJuj3wTDXckHHeK-HDyM3RZo9zpapdCo4HFvp2e4ZKtfr_3Cf_vW8Z2Pg8-7oZtVoFQcx5jLzS1kZUyl4WzjdpRunEEnzaa6yhPC5okBRpWWVitBLeW2pSZNJciT7UyUYztXoPrqMeFCyETQzEPKZFNOmZJZSgSNmyZjFzkUD2ebDhmm3jR_l1yai_HZl70mb3R27n3v32u-3C3da_JdjMfHsCSLVfgzgXSxRW4edCGE6zCoUs9Rn7Mt0mJsV5zkklFlD8OJ7UTaa6eTt-RbTKnvibNtR9SlVg6HjWE51OiSkNw-o4MPjyE71cy2kewXFalfQIkShROApXSXFKuY6203uJUob5LjdUJDWC9A0KmWz52lxbkOOvWZYiZzGMmgNcz0ZOGhORPQmsdErJWD9XZHAYBvJpVowZxx0KqtNUpyiTS09DJKIDHDfhmb4m5QI9a8ADEAixnAo6dfLGmHB15lnL0uyVj2Oa6B_DfO559-zrwhaf_HsFLuLU7OOhlvb3-_jO4zdw9FB8MuAbLk_GpfQ439K_JqB6_8LOSwOFV4_o3eih3Hw
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3fT9swED6xMlXjAVjHRoBtHuKhL0FO4uAY8YLooqF1FWIg9S04tiMqsRS1AYn_Hv9I01YMadLeHPmSWPad_dm--w7gQJCjqAilcWKQsU8Cnvt5ziO9VSlCzFVEC0fi2qeDQTIcsosVOJnFwjh-iObAzViGna-Ngat7WSxY-XRSHRqymOgNrBKTRKYFq73L9Lo_d_FgLj0yw8yncTismYWMJ0_z8vJ69AJkvvSVXMSwdhFKN_6v-ZuwXoNPdOq05T2sqLIDawuUhB1o_6ov2z_AjUnMhf7MDxGRVHZeQdUYcXtZjKZGxAVmPh2jUzQnhkYuKAaNS126Gzk68CfES4m0co-kftiC6_T71dkPv07I4AtCIj2AAqtAMZazwsAKYdjwiLZbIQURQZ4UOI4LjUlYoQSnRCmsklAmOaN5IrgMoo_QKsel2gYUxFyrCE9wzjARkeBCHBHM9WyQSCVi7EF3NiyZqNnKTdKMu2y2a9H9l9n-82C_Eb13FB1_E9qbjW1WW-k002AwoIaPh3rwranW9mUuTXipxg9aJmaWpI0FHnxyqtD8JSJU401KPKBLStIIGO7u5ZpydGs5vDUqZWGov9m1SvJ6w7Pfl1e2sPPvol-hfdFLs_754OcuvAtNwIb1mtuDVjV5UJ_hrXisRtPJl9pgngEdfRwB
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Skin+measurement+devices+to+assess+skin+quality%3A+A+systematic+review+on+reliability+and+validity&rft.jtitle=Skin+research+and+technology&rft.au=Langeveld%2C+Mirte&rft.au=van+de+Lande%2C+Lara+S.&rft.au=O%E2%80%99+Sullivan%2C+Eimear&rft.au=van+der+Lei%2C+Berend&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.pub=John+Wiley+and+Sons+Inc&rft.issn=0909-752X&rft.eissn=1600-0846&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=212&rft.epage=224&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fsrt.13113&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F34751474&rft.externalDocID=PMC9299221
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0909-752X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0909-752X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0909-752X&client=summon