Applying the Dynamic Dual Pathway Model of Approach Coping to Collective Action Among Advantaged Group Allies and Disadvantaged Group Members
We apply the dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping to understanding the predictors of future collective action among a sample of advantaged group allies and disadvantaged group members who were attending a protest. We propose that problem-focused approach coping (i.e., group efficacy beliefs...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Frontiers in psychology Jg. 13; S. 875848 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Frontiers Media S.A
06.06.2022
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 1664-1078, 1664-1078 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Abstract | We apply the dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping to understanding the predictors of future collective action among a sample of advantaged group allies and disadvantaged group members who were attending a protest. We propose that problem-focused approach coping (i.e., group efficacy beliefs) would be a stronger predictor of future collective action among disadvantaged compared to advantaged group members, and emotion-focused approach coping (i.e., group-based anger) would be a stronger predictor of future collective action among advantaged compared to disadvantaged group members. Data was collected from LGBTIQ+ and heterosexual people (
N
= 189) protesting as part of the 2019 Christopher Street Day Parade in Cologne, Germany. We found that increased group efficacy predicted intentions to engage in future collective action for the rights of sexual minorities among LGBTIQ+ but not heterosexual participants. Increased group-based anger was a predictor of future collective action intentions regardless of which group the participants belonged to. Our findings extend the dynamic dual pathway model by applying it to a sample of advantaged group allies and disadvantaged group members attending a protest using a multiple perspectives approach. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | We apply the dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping to understanding the predictors of future collective action among a sample of advantaged group allies and disadvantaged group members who were attending a protest. We propose that problem-focused approach coping (i.e., group efficacy beliefs) would be a stronger predictor of future collective action among disadvantaged compared to advantaged group members, and emotion-focused approach coping (i.e., group-based anger) would be a stronger predictor of future collective action among advantaged compared to disadvantaged group members. Data was collected from LGBTIQ+ and heterosexual people (N = 189) protesting as part of the 2019 Christopher Street Day Parade in Cologne, Germany. We found that increased group efficacy predicted intentions to engage in future collective action for the rights of sexual minorities among LGBTIQ+ but not heterosexual participants. Increased group-based anger was a predictor of future collective action intentions regardless of which group the participants belonged to. Our findings extend the dynamic dual pathway model by applying it to a sample of advantaged group allies and disadvantaged group members attending a protest using a multiple perspectives approach. We apply the dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping to understanding the predictors of future collective action among a sample of advantaged group allies and disadvantaged group members who were attending a protest. We propose that problem-focused approach coping (i.e., group efficacy beliefs) would be a stronger predictor of future collective action among disadvantaged compared to advantaged group members, and emotion-focused approach coping (i.e., group-based anger) would be a stronger predictor of future collective action among advantaged compared to disadvantaged group members. Data was collected from LGBTIQ+ and heterosexual people ( N = 189) protesting as part of the 2019 Christopher Street Day Parade in Cologne, Germany. We found that increased group efficacy predicted intentions to engage in future collective action for the rights of sexual minorities among LGBTIQ+ but not heterosexual participants. Increased group-based anger was a predictor of future collective action intentions regardless of which group the participants belonged to. Our findings extend the dynamic dual pathway model by applying it to a sample of advantaged group allies and disadvantaged group members attending a protest using a multiple perspectives approach. We apply the dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping to understanding the predictors of future collective action among a sample of advantaged group allies and disadvantaged group members who were attending a protest. We propose that problem-focused approach coping (i.e., group efficacy beliefs) would be a stronger predictor of future collective action among disadvantaged compared to advantaged group members, and emotion-focused approach coping (i.e., group-based anger) would be a stronger predictor of future collective action among advantaged compared to disadvantaged group members. Data was collected from LGBTIQ+ and heterosexual people (N = 189) protesting as part of the 2019 Christopher Street Day Parade in Cologne, Germany. We found that increased group efficacy predicted intentions to engage in future collective action for the rights of sexual minorities among LGBTIQ+ but not heterosexual participants. Increased group-based anger was a predictor of future collective action intentions regardless of which group the participants belonged to. Our findings extend the dynamic dual pathway model by applying it to a sample of advantaged group allies and disadvantaged group members attending a protest using a multiple perspectives approach.We apply the dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping to understanding the predictors of future collective action among a sample of advantaged group allies and disadvantaged group members who were attending a protest. We propose that problem-focused approach coping (i.e., group efficacy beliefs) would be a stronger predictor of future collective action among disadvantaged compared to advantaged group members, and emotion-focused approach coping (i.e., group-based anger) would be a stronger predictor of future collective action among advantaged compared to disadvantaged group members. Data was collected from LGBTIQ+ and heterosexual people (N = 189) protesting as part of the 2019 Christopher Street Day Parade in Cologne, Germany. We found that increased group efficacy predicted intentions to engage in future collective action for the rights of sexual minorities among LGBTIQ+ but not heterosexual participants. Increased group-based anger was a predictor of future collective action intentions regardless of which group the participants belonged to. Our findings extend the dynamic dual pathway model by applying it to a sample of advantaged group allies and disadvantaged group members attending a protest using a multiple perspectives approach. |
| Author | Becker, Julia C. Radke, Helena R. M. Kutlaca, Maja |
| AuthorAffiliation | 2 Department of Psychology, Durham University , Durham , United Kingdom 1 Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh , United Kingdom 3 Department of Psychology, Osnabrück University , Osnabrück , Germany |
| AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh , United Kingdom – name: 2 Department of Psychology, Durham University , Durham , United Kingdom – name: 3 Department of Psychology, Osnabrück University , Osnabrück , Germany |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Helena R. M. surname: Radke fullname: Radke, Helena R. M. – sequence: 2 givenname: Maja surname: Kutlaca fullname: Kutlaca, Maja – sequence: 3 givenname: Julia C. surname: Becker fullname: Becker, Julia C. |
| BookMark | eNp9Us1u1DAQtlARLUsfgJuPXHZxHCdxLkjRLpRKreAAZ8t2xllXThzsZKs8BO-Md7dCtAd8mZG_n7E131t0MfgBEHqfkU2e8_qjGePSbSihdMOrgjP-Cl1lZcnWGan4xT_9JbqO8YGkwwglhL5Bl3lR5YyV9Ar9bsbRLXbo8LQHvFsG2VuNd7N0-Luc9o9ywfe-BYe9wYkavNR7vPXjSeFT5xzoyR4AN6n4ATe9T1DTHuQwyQ5afBP8POLGOQsRy6HFOxvlS_geegUhvkOvjXQRrp_qCv388vnH9uv67tvN7ba5W2vG6LQulJIFV1oR03KTU8hJrlUNULeGFJTX0pRMtlUBVanSTwtQXCcSYUXZcqbzFbo9-7ZePogx2F6GRXhpxenCh07IMFntQChGgMmSZMoQpnjGwRhdU1odB_Ds6PXp7DXOqodWwzAF6Z6ZPkcGuxedP4iakopVJBl8eDII_tcMcRK9jRqckwP4OQpackLzskw7W6HsTNXBxxjA_B2TEXFMhTilQhxTIc6pSJrqhUbbSR53lV5j3X-UfwBnJcGP |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1027_2151_2604_a000591 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2023_1154501 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jesp_2023_104454 crossref_primary_10_1111_bjso_12895 crossref_primary_10_1002_casp_70164 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cresp_2025_100234 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_copsyc_2024_101902 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1111/spc3.12436 10.3758/BF03193146 10.1177/0146167207309193 10.1177/0146167202250923 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1990.tb00902.x 10.1080/10463283.2018.1479347 10.1111/josi.12168 10.1371/journal.pone.0230918 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2015.04.001 10.1016/j.jesp.2018.03.016 10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001 10.1177/1368430210395637 10.1177/1088868311430835 10.1002/ejsp.2720 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1995.tb00610.x 10.1177/1368430219889134 10.17813/maiq.20.1.x042hj37w2778ql4 10.1017/S0140525X11002214 10.1111/josi.12083 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00159.x 10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649 10.1080/00131946.2015.1075989 10.2307/2095417 10.1086/226464 10.1177/0146167213487078 10.1002/ejsp.2746 10.1038/s41562-019-0815-z 10.1177/1368430211413619 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00077.x 10.1177/1088868309341563 10.1111/bjso.12095 10.1037/0003-066X.56.4.319 10.1177/0146167202238377 10.1007/s10519-008-9237-9 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01618.x 10.1037//0022-3514.58.6.994 10.1177/1088868320918698 10.17813/1086/671X-21-1-83 10.1111/ajpy.12249 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Copyright © 2022 Radke, Kutlaca and Becker. Copyright © 2022 Radke, Kutlaca and Becker. 2022 Radke, Kutlaca and Becker |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2022 Radke, Kutlaca and Becker. – notice: Copyright © 2022 Radke, Kutlaca and Becker. 2022 Radke, Kutlaca and Becker |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.875848 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Psychology |
| EISSN | 1664-1078 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_b40e4a601bf04b818effc92274ad781c PMC9207470 10_3389_fpsyg_2022_875848 |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: ; grantid: 4648/4-2 |
| GroupedDBID | 53G 5VS 9T4 AAFWJ AAKDD AAYXX ABIVO ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ADBBV ADRAZ AEGXH AFPKN AIAGR ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL BCNDV CITATION DIK EBS EJD EMOBN F5P GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HYE KQ8 M48 M~E O5R O5S OK1 P2P PGMZT RNS RPM 7X8 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-5bba58bcb0fd8f32e303cb9ee9df05289af64ad75e76b7345eb8ce300456d84c3 |
| IEDL.DBID | DOA |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 8 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000813163100001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1664-1078 |
| IngestDate | Fri Oct 03 12:52:34 EDT 2025 Tue Sep 30 16:43:17 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 06:50:46 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 02:52:44 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:15:18 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Language | English |
| License | This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c442t-5bba58bcb0fd8f32e303cb9ee9df05289af64ad75e76b7345eb8ce300456d84c3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Edited by: Kimberly Rios, Ohio University, United States Reviewed by: Magdalena Bobowik, Utrecht University, Netherlands; Mason Burns, University of Indianapolis, United States This article was submitted to Personality and Social Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology |
| OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/b40e4a601bf04b818effc92274ad781c |
| PMID | 35734462 |
| PQID | 2680236657 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b40e4a601bf04b818effc92274ad781c pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9207470 proquest_miscellaneous_2680236657 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2022_875848 crossref_citationtrail_10_3389_fpsyg_2022_875848 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2022-06-06 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-06-06 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2022 text: 2022-06-06 day: 06 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationTitle | Frontiers in psychology |
| PublicationYear | 2022 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media S.A |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Frontiers Media S.A |
| References | Zucker (B43) 2004; 28 Iyer (B16) 2003; 29 Di Bernardo (B3) 2019; 24 Van Zomeren (B36) 2018; 29 Ellemers (B8) 1990; 29 Lazarus (B20) 1991 Dixon (B4) 2012; 35 Ferris (B10) 2019; 71 Klandermans (B17) 1984; 49 Van Zomeren (B38) 2008; 134 Van Zomeren (B37) 2012; 16 Faul (B9) 2007; 39 Czopp (B2) 2003; 29 Harth (B13) 2008; 34 Kutlaca (B18); 50 Simon (B29) 2001; 56 Hässler (B14) 2020; 4 Thomas (B31) 2012; 15 Saguy (B27) 2013; 39 Walgrave (B41) 2016; 21 Stride (B30) 2015 Droogendyk (B5) 2016; 72 Thomas (B32) 2009; 13 Hornsey (B15) 2006; 36 Van Leeuwen (B33) 2015; 20 Kutlaca (B19); 15 Muthén (B23) 2002; 4 Van Zomeren (B35) 2009; 65 Cohen-Chen (B1) 2018; 77 Ellemers (B7) 1993 Drury (B6) 2014; 70 Scheifele (B28) 2021; 51 Van Zomeren (B34) 2015; 39 Louis (B21) 2019; 13 Saab (B26) 2015; 54 Olson (B24) 1968 Radke (B25) 2020; 24 Van Zomeren (B39) 2011; 14 Van Zomeren (B40) 2004; 87 Wright (B42) 1990; 58 Gorski (B11) 2015; 51 Groves (B12) 1995; 43 McCarthy (B22) 1977; 82 |
| References_xml | – volume: 13 year: 2019 ident: B21 article-title: Emerging research on intergroup prosociality: group members’ charitable giving, positive contact, allyship, and solidarity with others. publication-title: Soc. Pers. Compass doi: 10.1111/spc3.12436 – volume: 39 start-page: 175 year: 2007 ident: B9 article-title: G* Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. publication-title: Behav. Res. Methods doi: 10.3758/BF03193146 – volume: 34 start-page: 115 year: 2008 ident: B13 article-title: Advantaged group’s emotional reactions to intergroup inequality: the dynamics of pride, guilt and sympathy. publication-title: Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. doi: 10.1177/0146167207309193 – volume: 29 start-page: 532 year: 2003 ident: B2 article-title: Confronting prejudice (literally): reactions to confrontations of racial and gender bias. publication-title: Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. doi: 10.1177/0146167202250923 – volume: 29 start-page: 233 year: 1990 ident: B8 article-title: The influence of permeability of group boundaries and stability of group status on strategies of individual mobility and social change. publication-title: Br. J. Soc. Psychol. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1990.tb00902.x – volume: 29 start-page: 122 year: 2018 ident: B36 article-title: Integrating who “we” are with what “we” (will not) stand for: a further extension of the social identity model of collective action. publication-title: Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. doi: 10.1080/10463283.2018.1479347 – volume: 72 start-page: 315 year: 2016 ident: B5 article-title: Acting in solidarity: cross-group contact between disadvantaged group members and advantaged group allies. publication-title: J. Soc. Issues doi: 10.1111/josi.12168 – volume: 15 ident: B19 article-title: Friends or foes? How activists and non-activists perceive and evaluate each other. publication-title: PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230918 – volume: 39 start-page: 1 year: 2015 ident: B34 article-title: Collective action as relational interaction: a new relational hypothesis on how non-activists become activists. publication-title: New Ideas Psychol. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2015.04.001 – volume: 77 start-page: 50 year: 2018 ident: B1 article-title: Yes we can? Group efficacy beliefs predict collective action, but only when hope is high. publication-title: J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2018.03.016 – year: 1991 ident: B20 publication-title: Emotion and Adaptation. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001 – volume: 14 start-page: 735 year: 2011 ident: B39 article-title: Can moral convictions motivate the advantaged to challenge social inequality? Extending the social identity model of collective action. publication-title: Group Process. Intergr. Relat. doi: 10.1177/1368430210395637 – volume: 16 start-page: 180 year: 2012 ident: B37 article-title: Protesters as “passionate economists” a dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping with collective disadvantage. publication-title: Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. doi: 10.1177/1088868311430835 – volume: 50 start-page: 1248 ident: B18 article-title: Understanding allies’ participation in social change: a multiple perspectives approach. publication-title: Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2720 – volume: 43 start-page: 435 year: 1995 ident: B12 article-title: Learning to feel: the neglected sociology of social movements. publication-title: Sociol. Rev. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1995.tb00610.x – volume: 24 start-page: 26 year: 2019 ident: B3 article-title: Fostering social change among advantaged and disadvantaged group members: integrating intergroup contact and social identity perspectives on collective action. publication-title: Group Process. Intergr. Relat. doi: 10.1177/1368430219889134 – volume: 20 start-page: 81 year: 2015 ident: B33 article-title: A study of perceived protest atmospheres: how demonstrators evaluate police-demonstrator interactions and why. publication-title: Mobilization Int. Q. doi: 10.17813/maiq.20.1.x042hj37w2778ql4 – volume: 35 start-page: 411 year: 2012 ident: B4 article-title: Beyond prejudice: are negative evaluations the problem and is getting us to like one another more the solution? publication-title: Behav. Brain Sci. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11002214 – volume: 70 start-page: 637 year: 2014 ident: B6 article-title: Allies against sexism: the role of men in confronting sexism. publication-title: J. Soc. Issues doi: 10.1111/josi.12083 – volume: 28 start-page: 423 year: 2004 ident: B43 article-title: Disavowing social identities: what it means when women say, “I’m not a feminist, but…”. publication-title: Psychol. Women Q. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00159.x – start-page: 22 year: 1993 ident: B7 article-title: The influence of socio-structural variables on identity management strategies publication-title: European Review of Social Psychology – volume: 87 start-page: 649 year: 2004 ident: B40 article-title: Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. publication-title: J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649 – volume: 51 start-page: 385 year: 2015 ident: B11 article-title: “Frayed all over:” the causes and consequences of activist burnout among social justice education activists. publication-title: Educ. Stud. doi: 10.1080/00131946.2015.1075989 – volume: 49 start-page: 583 year: 1984 ident: B17 article-title: Mobilization and participation: social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. publication-title: Am. Sociol. Rev. doi: 10.2307/2095417 – volume: 82 start-page: 1212 year: 1977 ident: B22 article-title: Resource mobilization and social movements: a partial theory. publication-title: Am. J. Sociol. doi: 10.1086/226464 – volume: 39 start-page: 1030 year: 2013 ident: B27 article-title: Insecure status relations shape preferences for the content of intergroup contact. publication-title: Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. doi: 10.1177/0146167213487078 – volume: 51 start-page: 1038 year: 2021 ident: B28 article-title: Testing the basic socio-structural assumptions of social identity theory in the gender context: evidence from correlational studies on women’s leadership. publication-title: Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2746 – volume: 4 start-page: 380 year: 2020 ident: B14 article-title: A large-scale test of the link between intergroup contact and support for social change. publication-title: Nat. Hum. Behav. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0815-z – volume: 15 start-page: 75 year: 2012 ident: B31 article-title: Social identities facilitate and encapsulate action-relevant constructs: a test of the social identity model of collective action. publication-title: Group Process. Intergr. Relat. doi: 10.1177/1368430211413619 – volume: 36 start-page: 1701 year: 2006 ident: B15 article-title: Why do people engage in collective action? Revisiting the role of perceived effectiveness. publication-title: J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00077.x – volume: 13 start-page: 194 year: 2009 ident: B32 article-title: Aligning identities, emotions, and beliefs to create commitment to sustainable social and political action. publication-title: Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. doi: 10.1177/1088868309341563 – volume: 54 start-page: 539 year: 2015 ident: B26 article-title: Acting in solidarity: testing an extended dual pathway model of collective action by bystander group members. publication-title: Br. J. Soc. Psychol. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12095 – volume: 56 start-page: 319 year: 2001 ident: B29 article-title: Politicized collective identity: a social psychological analysis. publication-title: Am. Psychol. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.56.4.319 – volume: 29 start-page: 117 year: 2003 ident: B16 article-title: White guilt and racial compensation: the benefits and limits of self-focus. publication-title: Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. doi: 10.1177/0146167202238377 – volume: 4 start-page: 1 year: 2002 ident: B23 article-title: Latent variable analysis with categorical outcomes: multiple-group and growth modeling in Mplus. publication-title: Mplus Web Notes doi: 10.1007/s10519-008-9237-9 – year: 2015 ident: B30 publication-title: Mplus Code for Mediation, Moderation, and Moderated Mediation Models. – volume: 134 start-page: 504 year: 2008 ident: B38 article-title: Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. publication-title: Psychol. Bull. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504 – volume: 65 start-page: 645 year: 2009 ident: B35 article-title: Introduction to the social and psychological dynamics of collective action. publication-title: J. Soc. Issues doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01618.x – volume: 58 start-page: 994 year: 1990 ident: B42 article-title: Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: from acceptance to collective protest. publication-title: J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.58.6.994 – volume: 24 start-page: 291 year: 2020 ident: B25 article-title: Beyond allyship: motivations for advantaged group members to engage in action for disadvantaged groups. publication-title: Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. doi: 10.1177/1088868320918698 – year: 1968 ident: B24 publication-title: The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. – volume: 21 start-page: 83 year: 2016 ident: B41 article-title: Response problems in the protest survey design: evidence from fifty-one protest events in seven countries. publication-title: Mobilization Int. Q. doi: 10.17813/1086/671X-21-1-83 – volume: 71 start-page: 312 year: 2019 ident: B10 article-title: Divide and conquer? Identity, threat, and moral justification of violence at the G20. publication-title: Aust. J. Psychol. doi: 10.1111/ajpy.12249 |
| SSID | ssj0000402002 |
| Score | 2.3628619 |
| Snippet | We apply the dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping to understanding the predictors of future collective action among a sample of advantaged group... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database |
| StartPage | 875848 |
| SubjectTerms | allies collective action group efficacy LGBTIQ protest Psychology social change |
| Title | Applying the Dynamic Dual Pathway Model of Approach Coping to Collective Action Among Advantaged Group Allies and Disadvantaged Group Members |
| URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2680236657 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9207470 https://doaj.org/article/b40e4a601bf04b818effc92274ad781c |
| Volume | 13 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000813163100001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1664-1078 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0000402002 issn: 1664-1078 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20100101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVHPJ databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources customDbUrl: eissn: 1664-1078 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0000402002 issn: 1664-1078 databaseCode: M~E dateStart: 20100101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org providerName: ISSN International Centre |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELag4tAL4imWRzVInJBCvY4dJ8fQbcWlVQ8g7S3yE1ZaZasmC9oL_4D_zIyTrjYc4MIlhzhWHM94_H2xPR9j73zkyHuMyaSXSFC08plBmJtFw6UOoRBzO4hN6Kurcrmsrg-kvmhP2JAeeOi4Uyt5kAZpg41cWpxeQoyuEkimjNfl3FH05bo6IFMpBhMt4mJYxkQWVp3Gm273FfmgEB8Qopek93MwEaV8_ROQOd0ieTDnXDxiD0ewCPXQyMfsXmifsON9zNo9Zb8IRdJJJUAgB4tBXh4WW6x1jdjuh9kBqZ2tYROhHtOHw1k6JAX9BtJvgxTxoE4HHKAm8SFIWss9hhoP6ecU1GvEqh2Y1sNi1Zk_iy8D6Yp0z9iXi_PPZ5-yUWEhc1KKPlPWGlVaZ3n0ZcxFwAnN2SqECm2okIuZWFA_q6ALq3Opgi1dyBMO9KV0-XN21G7a8IKBcMYiu3FSWwQ5c2-UyZF7OZn73HqlZozfdXfjxvTjpIKxbpCGkIWaZKGGLNQMFpqx9_sqN0Pujb89_JFsuH-Q0manG-hMzehMzb-cacbe3nlAg8OM1k5MGzbbrhEFZcqjZaoZ0xPXmLxxWtKuvqWE3ZUgmQL-8n808RU7pq9Ou9WK1-yov92GN-yB-96vutsTdl8vy5M0FvB6-fP8N3xME7s |
| linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Applying+the+Dynamic+Dual+Pathway+Model+of+Approach+Coping+to+Collective+Action+Among+Advantaged+Group+Allies+and+Disadvantaged+Group+Members&rft.jtitle=Frontiers+in+psychology&rft.au=Radke%2C+Helena+R.+M.&rft.au=Kutlaca%2C+Maja&rft.au=Becker%2C+Julia+C.&rft.date=2022-06-06&rft.issn=1664-1078&rft.eissn=1664-1078&rft.volume=13&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2022.875848&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_3389_fpsyg_2022_875848 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1664-1078&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1664-1078&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1664-1078&client=summon |