Determinants of weekly sitting time: construct validation of an initial COM-B model and comparison of its predictive validity with the Theory of Planned Behaviour

In relation to sitting behaviour, to investigate which theoretical domains best formed the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation constructs of the COM-B, and compare the predictive validity to the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), taking habit strength into consideration. Using a prospective desi...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:

Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:	Psychology & health Ročník 36; číslo 1; s. 96 - 114
Hlavní autoři:	Howlett, Neil, Schulz, Joerg, Trivedi, Daksha, Troop, Nicholas, Chater, Angel
Médium:	Journal Article
Jazyk:	angličtina
Vydáno:	England Routledge 2021 Taylor & Francis Ltd
Témata:	Adult COM-B Female habit Habits Humans Intention Male Models, Psychological Prospective Studies Psychological Theory Reproducibility of Results Sedentary Behavior sedentary behaviour Self Report Sitting Position Theoretical Domains Framework Theory of Planned Behaviour: sitting Time Factors Validity sedentary behaviour COM-B habit Theoretical Domains Framework Theory of Planned Behaviour: sitting
ISSN:	0887-0446, 1476-8321, 1476-8321
On-line přístup:	Získat plný text
Tagy:	Přidat tag Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!

Abstract	In relation to sitting behaviour, to investigate which theoretical domains best formed the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation constructs of the COM-B, and compare the predictive validity to the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), taking habit strength into consideration. Using a prospective design, 186 adults completed measures capturing domains from the Theoretical Domains Framework for the three COM-B constructs, and habit strength, which were examined using a formative measurement model. Predictive validity was then compared to the TPB. Self-reported sitting behaviour. Self-monitoring (behavioural regulation domain) formed Capability; subjective norm (social influences domain) formed Opportunity; intention (intentions domain), positive affect (emotion domain), and perceived behavioural control (beliefs about capabilities domain), formed Motivation. The COM-B strongly predicted sitting behaviour (27% variance explained), with Capability, Opportunity, and habit strength as key drivers. The TPB explained a large amount of variance (23%) in sitting behaviour, with intention and habit strength as key drivers. The behavioural regulation domain of Capability, the social influences domain of Opportunity, and habit strength were important drivers of sitting behaviour, with comparable variance predicted in the COM-B and TPB. Future research should consider this approach to conceptualise the COM-B for specific populations and behaviours.
AbstractList	In relation to sitting behaviour, to investigate which theoretical domains best formed the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation constructs of the COM-B, and compare the predictive validity to the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), taking habit strength into consideration.OBJECTIVEIn relation to sitting behaviour, to investigate which theoretical domains best formed the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation constructs of the COM-B, and compare the predictive validity to the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), taking habit strength into consideration.Using a prospective design, 186 adults completed measures capturing domains from the Theoretical Domains Framework for the three COM-B constructs, and habit strength, which were examined using a formative measurement model. Predictive validity was then compared to the TPB.DESIGNUsing a prospective design, 186 adults completed measures capturing domains from the Theoretical Domains Framework for the three COM-B constructs, and habit strength, which were examined using a formative measurement model. Predictive validity was then compared to the TPB.Self-reported sitting behaviour.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESSelf-reported sitting behaviour.Self-monitoring (behavioural regulation domain) formed Capability; subjective norm (social influences domain) formed Opportunity; intention (intentions domain), positive affect (emotion domain), and perceived behavioural control (beliefs about capabilities domain), formed Motivation. The COM-B strongly predicted sitting behaviour (27% variance explained), with Capability, Opportunity, and habit strength as key drivers. The TPB explained a large amount of variance (23%) in sitting behaviour, with intention and habit strength as key drivers.RESULTSSelf-monitoring (behavioural regulation domain) formed Capability; subjective norm (social influences domain) formed Opportunity; intention (intentions domain), positive affect (emotion domain), and perceived behavioural control (beliefs about capabilities domain), formed Motivation. The COM-B strongly predicted sitting behaviour (27% variance explained), with Capability, Opportunity, and habit strength as key drivers. The TPB explained a large amount of variance (23%) in sitting behaviour, with intention and habit strength as key drivers.The behavioural regulation domain of Capability, the social influences domain of Opportunity, and habit strength were important drivers of sitting behaviour, with comparable variance predicted in the COM-B and TPB. Future research should consider this approach to conceptualise the COM-B for specific populations and behaviours.CONCLUSIONSThe behavioural regulation domain of Capability, the social influences domain of Opportunity, and habit strength were important drivers of sitting behaviour, with comparable variance predicted in the COM-B and TPB. Future research should consider this approach to conceptualise the COM-B for specific populations and behaviours. Objective In relation to sitting behaviour, to investigate which theoretical domains best formed the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation constructs of the COM-B, and compare the predictive validity to the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), taking habit strength into consideration.Design Using a prospective design, 186 adults completed measures capturing domains from the Theoretical Domains Framework for the three COM-B constructs, and habit strength, which were examined using a formative measurement model. Predictive validity was then compared to the TPB.Main Outcome Measures Self-reported sitting behaviour.Results Self-monitoring (behavioural regulation domain) formed Capability; subjective norm (social influences domain) formed Opportunity; intention (intentions domain), positive affect (emotion domain), and perceived behavioural control (beliefs about capabilities domain), formed Motivation. The COM-B strongly predicted sitting behaviour (27% variance explained), with Capability, Opportunity, and habit strength as key drivers. The TPB explained a large amount of variance (23%) in sitting behaviour, with intention and habit strength as key drivers.Conclusions The behavioural regulation domain of Capability, the social influences domain of Opportunity, and habit strength were important drivers of sitting behaviour, with comparable variance predicted in the COM-B and TPB. Future research should consider this approach to conceptualise the COM-B for specific populations and behaviours. In relation to sitting behaviour, to investigate which theoretical domains best formed the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation constructs of the COM-B, and compare the predictive validity to the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), taking habit strength into consideration. Using a prospective design, 186 adults completed measures capturing domains from the Theoretical Domains Framework for the three COM-B constructs, and habit strength, which were examined using a formative measurement model. Predictive validity was then compared to the TPB. Self-reported sitting behaviour. Self-monitoring (behavioural regulation domain) formed Capability; subjective norm (social influences domain) formed Opportunity; intention (intentions domain), positive affect (emotion domain), and perceived behavioural control (beliefs about capabilities domain), formed Motivation. The COM-B strongly predicted sitting behaviour (27% variance explained), with Capability, Opportunity, and habit strength as key drivers. The TPB explained a large amount of variance (23%) in sitting behaviour, with intention and habit strength as key drivers. The behavioural regulation domain of Capability, the social influences domain of Opportunity, and habit strength were important drivers of sitting behaviour, with comparable variance predicted in the COM-B and TPB. Future research should consider this approach to conceptualise the COM-B for specific populations and behaviours.
Author	Troop, Nicholas Howlett, Neil Trivedi, Daksha Chater, Angel Schulz, Joerg
Author_xml	– sequence: 1 givenname: Neil orcidid: 0000-0002-6502-9969 surname: Howlett fullname: Howlett, Neil organization: Department of Psychology and Sport Sciences, University of Hertfordshire – sequence: 2 givenname: Joerg surname: Schulz fullname: Schulz, Joerg organization: Department of Psychology and Sport Sciences, University of Hertfordshire – sequence: 3 givenname: Daksha surname: Trivedi fullname: Trivedi, Daksha organization: Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire – sequence: 4 givenname: Nicholas surname: Troop fullname: Troop, Nicholas organization: Department of Psychology and Sport Sciences, University of Hertfordshire – sequence: 5 givenname: Angel surname: Chater fullname: Chater, Angel organization: UCL School of Pharmacy, Centre for Behavioural Medicine, Research Department of Practice and Policy, University College London
BackLink	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32403945$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark	eNqFkc1uEzEUhS1URNPCI4AssWEzxfZ4_mADDeVHKiqLsrYczzW5ZcZObSdRXocnrYckmy5gZenqO8dH55yRE-cdEPKSswvOWvaWtW3DpKwvBBP51NRl18knZMZlUxdtKfgJmU1MMUGn5CzGO8aYkJI9I6elkKzsZDUjfz5BgjCi0y5F6i3dAvwedjRiSuh-0YQjvKPGu5jC2iS60QP2OqF3E6wdRYcJ9UDnN9-LSzr6HoZ87rNkXOmAcQ9iNl8F6NEk3MDeBdOObjEtaVoCvV2CD7sJ_TFo56Cnl7DUG_Tr8Jw8tXqI8OLwnpOfn69u51-L65sv3-YfrwsjJU9FK5rGNFUDldEGFqaDeqEFtKySvOGy6nklrKit4Mx0nJdgpbWs7MGKRc-qrjwnb_a-q-Dv1xCTGjEaGHIe8Ouops6m1mqW0deP0Lsc1OV0mWoaWctS8ky9OlDrxQi9WgUcddipY_sZeL8HTPAxBrDKYPpbbgoaB8WZmrZWx63VtLU6bJ3V1SP18YP_6T7sdeisD6Pe-jD0Kund4IMN2hmMqvy3xQNlVcF5
CitedBy_id	crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sftr_2025_101020 crossref_primary_10_1007_s41542_022_00128_6 crossref_primary_10_1080_10872981_2025_2459910 crossref_primary_10_1111_ijcs_13100 crossref_primary_10_1108_YC_05_2023_1748 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sftr_2025_101104 crossref_primary_10_1123_jpah_2023_0340 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_025_22301_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eujim_2023_102270 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psychsport_2022_102222 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2025_1643332 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10926_022_10076_1 crossref_primary_10_2196_41275 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12877_024_05076_0 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2022_976109 crossref_primary_10_1111_ijcs_12778 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_021_11019_w crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2022_903109 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0277295
Cites_doi	10.1007/s12160-016-9816-6 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181930355 10.1016/0091-7435(87)90022-3 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0501_5 10.1371/journal.pone.0198483 10.3390/ijerph110909790 10.1371/journal.pone.0080000 10.3389/fphys.2017.00901 10.1093/tbm/iby010 10.1186/s12966-018-0652-x 10.1186/1748-5908-7-37 10.3390/ijerph15030417 10.1002/ejsp.258 10.1080/08870446.2011.613995 10.1007/s12160-015-9745-9 10.1186/s12966-017-0601-0 10.1111/isj.12131 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.10.020 10.1093/jurban/jth151 10.3390/ijerph16162903 10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424 10.1123/jsep.24.1.3 10.1037/hea0000300 10.1186/s12966-018-0746-5 10.1007/s00038-014-0540-3 10.1037/a0031629 10.1080/01490400802685948 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0602_02 10.1207/s15327558ijbm1204_5 10.1079/PHN2002427 10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.02.001 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01951.x 10.1080/14635240.2010.10708183 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42 10.1007/s40279-019-01168-9 10.1080/21642850.2014.912945 10.1080/11745398.2016.1238308 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 10.1080/02640414.2018.1464744 10.1007/s00125-013-2845-9 10.1037/a0032853 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099131 10.1111/bjhp.12032 10.1007/s10865-012-9442-0 10.1177/0022022106297301 10.1177/003151259407800313 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094618 10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8 10.1177/1359105317739098 10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249
ContentType	Journal Article
Copyright	2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2020 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
Copyright_xml	– notice: 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2020 – notice: 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
DBID	AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8
DOI	10.1080/08870446.2020.1763994
DatabaseName	CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle	CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList	MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE
Database_xml	– sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod	fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline	Psychology
EISSN	1476-8321
EndPage	114
ExternalDocumentID	32403945 10_1080_08870446_2020_1763994 1763994
Genre	Research Article Journal Article
GroupedDBID	--- .7I .QK 04C 0BK 0R~ 123 29P 36B 4.4 5VS 6PF AAGDL AAGZJ AAHIA AAMFJ AAMIU AAPUL AATTQ AAWTL AAZMC ABCCY ABDBF ABFIM ABIVO ABJNI ABLIJ ABPEM ABRYG ABTAI ABXUL ABXYU ABZLS ACGEJ ACGFS ACHQT ACTIO ACTOA ACUHS ADAHI ADBBV ADCVX ADKVQ ADOJX ADXPE AECIN AEFOU AEISY AEKEX AEOZL AEPSL AEYOC AEZRU AFHDM AFRVT AGDLA AGMYJ AGRBW AHDZW AIJEM AIYEW AJWEG AKBVH ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALQZU AQTUD AVBZW AWYRJ BEJHT BLEHA BMOTO BMSDO BOHLJ CCCUG CQ1 CS3 DGFLZ DKSSO DU5 DXH EAP EAS EBD EBS ECF ECT EHN EIHBH EMK ENB ENC ENX EPL EPS EPT ESX E~B E~C F5P FEDTE GTTXZ H13 HF~ HZ~ IPNFZ KSSTO KYCEM LJTGL M4Z NA5 NW- O9- PQQKQ Q~Q RIG RNANH ROSJB RSYQP S-F STATR TASJS TBQAZ TDBHL TEH TFH TFL TFW TN5 TNTFI TRJHH TUROJ TWZ UT5 UT9 VAE WQ9 YNT ~01 ~S~ AAYXX CITATION .GJ 07M 1TA 4B3 53G AANPH ABVXC ABWZE ACIKQ ACPKE ACRBO ADEWX ADIUE ADXAZ ADYSH AEXSR AIXGP ALLRG B0M C5A CAG CBZAQ CGR CKOZC COF CUY CVF C~T DGXZK ECM EFRLQ EGDCR EIF EJD FXNIP HVGLF JLMOS L7Y NPM OHT OVD QZZOY RBICI TBH TEORI UA1 UAP YYP 7X8
ID	FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-8277c757e5cacebc9e6ba2e805417145d152f26f210c9113ef4ff03def2bd0593
IEDL.DBID	TFW
ISICitedReferencesCount	22
ISICitedReferencesURI	http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000534173000001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN	0887-0446 1476-8321
IngestDate	Thu Oct 02 07:15:31 EDT 2025 Thu Nov 20 16:40:54 EST 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:55:53 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:18:37 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 06:24:57 EST 2025 Mon Oct 20 23:48:59 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess	false
IsOpenAccess	true
IsPeerReviewed	true
IsScholarly	true
Issue	1
Keywords	sedentary behaviour COM-B habit Theoretical Domains Framework Theory of Planned Behaviour: sitting
Language	English
LinkModel	DirectLink
MergedId	FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c441t-8277c757e5cacebc9e6ba2e805417145d152f26f210c9113ef4ff03def2bd0593
Notes	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23
ORCID	0000-0002-6502-9969
OpenAccessLink	http://hdl.handle.net/10547/624040
PMID	32403945
PQID	2477464341
PQPubID	105361
PageCount	19
ParticipantIDs	pubmed_primary_32403945 proquest_journals_2477464341 proquest_miscellaneous_2403039460 informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_08870446_2020_1763994 crossref_citationtrail_10_1080_08870446_2020_1763994 crossref_primary_10_1080_08870446_2020_1763994
PublicationCentury	2000
PublicationDate	2021-00-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD	2021-01-01
PublicationDate_xml	– year: 2021 text: 2021-00-00
PublicationDecade	2020
PublicationPlace	England
PublicationPlace_xml	– name: England – name: London
PublicationTitle	Psychology & health
PublicationTitleAlternate	Psychol Health
PublicationYear	2021
Publisher	Routledge Taylor & Francis Ltd
Publisher_xml	– name: Routledge – name: Taylor & Francis Ltd
References	CIT0030 CIT0032 CIT0031 CIT0034 CIT0033 CIT0036 CIT0035 CIT0038 CIT0037 CIT0039 CIT0041 CIT0040 CIT0043 Schwartzer R. (CIT0047) 1992 CIT0042 CIT0001 CIT0045 CIT0003 CIT0002 CIT0046 CIT0005 CIT0004 CIT0007 CIT0006 CIT0009 CIT0008 CIT0050 CIT0051 CIT0010 CIT0054 CIT0053 CIT0012 CIT0056 CIT0011 CIT0055 Fishbein M. (CIT0017) 2010 Schwarzer R. (CIT0048) 2009 CIT0014 CIT0058 CIT0013 CIT0057 CIT0016 CIT0015 CIT0059 CIT0018 CIT0019 Ringle C. (CIT0044) 2015 CIT0060 CIT38362086 CIT0021 CIT0020 CIT0022 Hair Jr J. F. (CIT0023) 2013 CIT6882607 CIT0025 CIT0024 CIT0027 CIT0026 CIT0029 CIT0028
References_xml	– ident: CIT0034 doi: 10.1007/s12160-016-9816-6 – ident: CIT0029 doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181930355 – volume-title: Self-efficacy: Thought control of action year: 1992 ident: CIT0047 – ident: CIT0046 doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(87)90022-3 – ident: CIT6882607 doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0501_5 – ident: CIT0033 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198483 – ident: CIT0058 doi: 10.3390/ijerph110909790 – ident: CIT0011 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080000 – ident: CIT0005 doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00901 – ident: CIT0027 doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby010 – ident: CIT0010 doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0652-x – ident: CIT0008 doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-37 – volume-title: SmartPLS 3 year: 2015 ident: CIT0044 – ident: CIT0037 doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030417 – ident: CIT0051 doi: 10.1002/ejsp.258 – ident: CIT0001 – ident: CIT0003 doi: 10.1080/08870446.2011.613995 – ident: CIT0036 – ident: CIT0054 doi: 10.1007/s12160-015-9745-9 – ident: CIT0057 doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0601-0 – ident: CIT0031 doi: 10.1111/isj.12131 – ident: CIT0043 doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.10.020 – ident: CIT0016 doi: 10.1093/jurban/jth151 – ident: CIT0038 doi: 10.3390/ijerph16162903 – ident: CIT0028 doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424 – ident: CIT0021 doi: 10.1123/jsep.24.1.3 – ident: CIT0032 doi: 10.1037/hea0000300 – ident: CIT0024 doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0746-5 – ident: CIT0015 doi: 10.1007/s00038-014-0540-3 – volume-title: A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) year: 2013 ident: CIT0023 – ident: CIT0012 doi: 10.1037/a0031629 – ident: CIT0042 doi: 10.1080/01490400802685948 – ident: CIT0002 doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0602_02 – ident: CIT0050 doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm1204_5 – ident: CIT0045 doi: 10.1079/PHN2002427 – ident: CIT0039 doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.02.001 – ident: CIT38362086 doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01951.x – volume-title: Health-specific self-efficacy scales year: 2009 ident: CIT0048 – ident: CIT0018 – ident: CIT0013 doi: 10.1080/14635240.2010.10708183 – ident: CIT0035 doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42 – ident: CIT0020 – ident: CIT0006 doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01168-9 – ident: CIT0022 doi: 10.1080/21642850.2014.912945 – ident: CIT0030 doi: 10.1080/11745398.2016.1238308 – ident: CIT0059 doi: 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 – ident: CIT0009 doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1464744 – ident: CIT0025 doi: 10.1007/s00125-013-2845-9 – ident: CIT0040 doi: 10.1037/a0032853 – ident: CIT0014 doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB – ident: CIT0053 doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099131 – ident: CIT0041 doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12032 – ident: CIT0019 doi: 10.1007/s10865-012-9442-0 – ident: CIT0055 doi: 10.1177/0022022106297301 – volume-title: Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach year: 2010 ident: CIT0017 – ident: CIT0004 doi: 10.1177/003151259407800313 – ident: CIT0007 doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094618 – ident: CIT0056 doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8 – ident: CIT0026 doi: 10.1177/1359105317739098 – ident: CIT0060 doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249
SSID	ssj0002440
Score	2.3975873
Snippet	In relation to sitting behaviour, to investigate which theoretical domains best formed the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation constructs of the COM-B, and... Objective In relation to sitting behaviour, to investigate which theoretical domains best formed the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation constructs of the...
SourceID	proquest pubmed crossref informaworld
SourceType	Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher
StartPage	96
SubjectTerms	Adult COM-B Female habit Habits Humans Intention Male Models, Psychological Prospective Studies Psychological Theory Reproducibility of Results Sedentary Behavior sedentary behaviour Self Report Sitting Position Theoretical Domains Framework Theory of Planned Behaviour: sitting Time Factors Validity
Title	Determinants of weekly sitting time: construct validation of an initial COM-B model and comparison of its predictive validity with the Theory of Planned Behaviour
URI	https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08870446.2020.1763994 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32403945 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2477464341 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2403039460
Volume	36
WOSCitedRecordID	wos000534173000001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText	1
inHoldings	1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights	– providerCode: PRVAWR databaseName: Taylor & Francis Journals Complete customDbUrl: eissn: 1476-8321 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0002440 issn: 0887-0446 databaseCode: TFW dateStart: 19870501 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.tandfonline.com providerName: Taylor & Francis
link	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3JTuQwEC0B4sCFfelhkUeaayDtOHHCja3FAZg5sPQtSrxIkVAadZoZze_wpVQ5TgQHxAGuie0kcrnqlV15D-AXQgDFeaiCpIwwQdGhCFJT2CCMFcIHnsSZ-0Pu_kre3KTjcfbHVxM2vqyScmjbEkU4X02LuyibriLuiBYGnUNidsfxkqQgS4ygGPpJw-B29ND7YgxeYcf1SV26f3g-GuVddHrHXfoxAnWRaLTyDd-wCssehrKT1m7WYM7U67DUe8P_G_By_qZQhk0s--e491lTuUppRqL0x0xNPAMtQ4utWn0malzUrKKyJHzG2e_r4JQ5xR28rJnqlQ-pYYWDP03ptIj8bjsKJgaM9ocZglPWkgdQU6evZDTzlI7P0024G13cnl0GXtAhUIi6ZkHKpVQyliZWhTKlykxSFtykCBtJhz3WCCYsTyymoQqdcGSssDaMtLG81KQ9uAUL9aQ2O8CkjbMy00PNrRYq1EVaRDZMdCp4aYZSDkB0E5krz3ZOohuP-bAjRfUzkNMM5H4GBnDYd3tq6T4-65C9tZJ85vZZbCuKkkef9N3rTCr3nqPJuUBAjjBRDAfws7-Na54OcoraTJ6pDbrmKBNJOIDt1hT7t3UEi5mIf3zhxXZhiVPpjttp2oMFtCOzD4vq76xqpgcwL8fpgVtnr6dxItI
linkProvider	Taylor & Francis
linkToHtml	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LT9wwEB7xkuBCgRa6QMFIvabNOk6ccOPRFVWX5bJtuVmJH1IklEW7S6v-nf5SZpyHlgPiANes7U3k8cw39vj7AD4jBNCchzpIiggTFBOKILW5C8JYI3zgSZz5G3K_hnI0Sm9vs8W7MFRWSTm0q4kivK-mxU2b0W1J3FdaGXQQiekdx0eSoqxYhtUYYy1Z-Xjwu_PGGL7Clu2T-rS3eJ4b5kl8esJe-jwG9bFo8O4tvmILNhskys5q09mGJVvtwEbnEP-9h_-XC7UybOLYX0-_z2alL5ZmpEt_yvSkIaFlaLRlLdFEjfOKlVSZhP9xcXMdnDMvuoOPDdOd-CE1LHHw-ykdGJHrrUfB3IDRFjFDfMpq_gBq6iWWrGENq-PD9AP8HHwbX1wFjaZDoBF4zYOUS6llLG2sc20LndmkyLlNETmSFHtsEE84njjMRDX64cg64VwYGet4YUh-cBdWqkllPwKTLs6KzPQNd0bo0ORpHrkwManghe1L2QPRzqTSDeE56W7cqX7Li9rMgKIZUM0M9OBL1-2-Zvx4qUO2aCZq7rdaXK2LoqIX-h62NqUa5zFTXCAmR6Qo-j046X7GZU9nOXllJw_UBr1zlIkk7MFebYvd23qOxUzE-694sWNYvxpfD9Xw--jHAWxwquTxG0-HsII2ZT_Bmv4zL2fTI7_cHgEolyYV
linkToPdf	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1NT9wwEB21FFVcSkuh3QLFlbgGso4TJ9z4WrWCbjlA4WYl_pAioexqd2nF3-kv7YzjRHBAHNprYjuOPB6_scfvAewiBNCcxzrKqgQDFBOLKLeli-JUI3zgWVr4G3I_z-V4nN_cFBchm3Ae0iophnYtUYT31TS5p8Z1GXH7NDHoHBKjO46PJC2y4iW8QuicUfx1ObrunTGuXnFH9kl1uks8TzXzaHl6RF76NAT1S9Fo9T_8xFt4E3AoO2wN5x28sM0arPTu8P49_Dl5kCnDJo799uT7bF77VGlGqvQHTE8CBS1Dk61bgSYqXDasprwk_Mbxj-_REfOSO_jYMN1LH1LBGhufzui4iBxv2wpGBow2iBmiU9ayB1BRL7BkDQucjnezdbganV4ef42CokOkEXYtopxLqWUqbapLbStd2Kwquc0RN5IQe2oQTTieOYxDNXrhxDrhXJwY63hlSHxwA5aaSWM_ApMuLarCDA13RujYlHmZuDgzueCVHUo5ANENpNKB7pxUN27VsGNFDSOgaARUGIEB7PXVpi3fx3MViodWohZ-o8W1qigqeabuVmdSKriOueICETniRDEcwJf-NU56OskpGzu5ozLom5NCZPEAPrSm2PfWMywWIv30Dx3bgdcXJyN1_m18tgkrnNJ4_K7TFiyhSdltWNa_FvV89tlPtr-MrSTG
openUrl	ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determinants+of+weekly+sitting+time%3A+construct+validation+of+an+initial+COM-B+model+and+comparison+of+its+predictive+validity+with+the+Theory+of+Planned+Behaviour&rft.jtitle=Psychology+%26+health&rft.au=Howlett%2C+Neil&rft.au=Schulz%2C+Joerg&rft.au=Trivedi%2C+Daksha&rft.au=Troop%2C+Nicholas&rft.date=2021&rft.issn=1476-8321&rft.eissn=1476-8321&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=96&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F08870446.2020.1763994&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0887-0446&client=summon
thumbnail_m	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0887-0446&client=summon
thumbnail_s	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0887-0446&client=summon