Fast neutron absorbed dose distributions in the energy range 0.5-80 meV--a Monte Carlo study

Neutron pencil-beam absorbed dose distributions in phantoms of bone, ICRU soft tissue, muscle, adipose and the tissue substitutes water, A-150 (plastic) and PMMA (acrylic) have been calculated using the Monte Carlo code FLUKA in the energy range 0.5 to 80 MeV. For neutrons of energies < or = 20 M...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physics in medicine & biology Vol. 45; no. 10; p. 2987
Main Authors: Söderberg, J, Carlsson, G A
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England 01.10.2000
Subjects:
ISSN:0031-9155
Online Access:Get more information
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Neutron pencil-beam absorbed dose distributions in phantoms of bone, ICRU soft tissue, muscle, adipose and the tissue substitutes water, A-150 (plastic) and PMMA (acrylic) have been calculated using the Monte Carlo code FLUKA in the energy range 0.5 to 80 MeV. For neutrons of energies < or = 20 MeV, the results were compared to those obtained using the Monte Carlo code MCNP4B. Broad-beam depth doses and lateral dose distributions were derived. Broad-beam dose distributions in various materials were compared using two kinds of scaling factor: a depth-scaling factor and a dose-scaling factor. Build-up factors due to scattered neutrons and photons were derived and the appropriate choice of phantom material for determining dose distributions in soft tissue examined. Water was found to be a good substitute for soft tissue even at neutron energies as high as 80 MeV. The relative absorbed doses due to photons ranged from 2% to 15% for neutron energies 10-80 MeV depending on phantom material and depth. For neutron energies below 10 MeV the depth dose distributions derived with MCNP4B and FLUKA differed significantly, the difference being probably due to the use of multigroup transport of low energy (< 19.6 MeV) neutrons in FLUKA. Agreement improved with increasing neutron energies up to 20 MeV. At energies > 20 MeV, MCNP4B fails to describe dose build-up at the phantom interface and penumbra at the edge of the beam because it does not transport secondary charged particles. The penumbra width, defined as the distance between the 80% and 20% iso-dose levels at 5 cm depth and for a 10 x 10 cm2 field, was between 0.9 mm and 7.2 mm for neutron energies 10-80 MeV.
AbstractList Neutron pencil-beam absorbed dose distributions in phantoms of bone, ICRU soft tissue, muscle, adipose and the tissue substitutes water, A-150 (plastic) and PMMA (acrylic) have been calculated using the Monte Carlo code FLUKA in the energy range 0.5 to 80 MeV. For neutrons of energies < or = 20 MeV, the results were compared to those obtained using the Monte Carlo code MCNP4B. Broad-beam depth doses and lateral dose distributions were derived. Broad-beam dose distributions in various materials were compared using two kinds of scaling factor: a depth-scaling factor and a dose-scaling factor. Build-up factors due to scattered neutrons and photons were derived and the appropriate choice of phantom material for determining dose distributions in soft tissue examined. Water was found to be a good substitute for soft tissue even at neutron energies as high as 80 MeV. The relative absorbed doses due to photons ranged from 2% to 15% for neutron energies 10-80 MeV depending on phantom material and depth. For neutron energies below 10 MeV the depth dose distributions derived with MCNP4B and FLUKA differed significantly, the difference being probably due to the use of multigroup transport of low energy (< 19.6 MeV) neutrons in FLUKA. Agreement improved with increasing neutron energies up to 20 MeV. At energies > 20 MeV, MCNP4B fails to describe dose build-up at the phantom interface and penumbra at the edge of the beam because it does not transport secondary charged particles. The penumbra width, defined as the distance between the 80% and 20% iso-dose levels at 5 cm depth and for a 10 x 10 cm2 field, was between 0.9 mm and 7.2 mm for neutron energies 10-80 MeV.Neutron pencil-beam absorbed dose distributions in phantoms of bone, ICRU soft tissue, muscle, adipose and the tissue substitutes water, A-150 (plastic) and PMMA (acrylic) have been calculated using the Monte Carlo code FLUKA in the energy range 0.5 to 80 MeV. For neutrons of energies < or = 20 MeV, the results were compared to those obtained using the Monte Carlo code MCNP4B. Broad-beam depth doses and lateral dose distributions were derived. Broad-beam dose distributions in various materials were compared using two kinds of scaling factor: a depth-scaling factor and a dose-scaling factor. Build-up factors due to scattered neutrons and photons were derived and the appropriate choice of phantom material for determining dose distributions in soft tissue examined. Water was found to be a good substitute for soft tissue even at neutron energies as high as 80 MeV. The relative absorbed doses due to photons ranged from 2% to 15% for neutron energies 10-80 MeV depending on phantom material and depth. For neutron energies below 10 MeV the depth dose distributions derived with MCNP4B and FLUKA differed significantly, the difference being probably due to the use of multigroup transport of low energy (< 19.6 MeV) neutrons in FLUKA. Agreement improved with increasing neutron energies up to 20 MeV. At energies > 20 MeV, MCNP4B fails to describe dose build-up at the phantom interface and penumbra at the edge of the beam because it does not transport secondary charged particles. The penumbra width, defined as the distance between the 80% and 20% iso-dose levels at 5 cm depth and for a 10 x 10 cm2 field, was between 0.9 mm and 7.2 mm for neutron energies 10-80 MeV.
Neutron pencil-beam absorbed dose distributions in phantoms of bone, ICRU soft tissue, muscle, adipose and the tissue substitutes water, A-150 (plastic) and PMMA (acrylic) have been calculated using the Monte Carlo code FLUKA in the energy range 0.5 to 80 MeV. For neutrons of energies < or = 20 MeV, the results were compared to those obtained using the Monte Carlo code MCNP4B. Broad-beam depth doses and lateral dose distributions were derived. Broad-beam dose distributions in various materials were compared using two kinds of scaling factor: a depth-scaling factor and a dose-scaling factor. Build-up factors due to scattered neutrons and photons were derived and the appropriate choice of phantom material for determining dose distributions in soft tissue examined. Water was found to be a good substitute for soft tissue even at neutron energies as high as 80 MeV. The relative absorbed doses due to photons ranged from 2% to 15% for neutron energies 10-80 MeV depending on phantom material and depth. For neutron energies below 10 MeV the depth dose distributions derived with MCNP4B and FLUKA differed significantly, the difference being probably due to the use of multigroup transport of low energy (< 19.6 MeV) neutrons in FLUKA. Agreement improved with increasing neutron energies up to 20 MeV. At energies > 20 MeV, MCNP4B fails to describe dose build-up at the phantom interface and penumbra at the edge of the beam because it does not transport secondary charged particles. The penumbra width, defined as the distance between the 80% and 20% iso-dose levels at 5 cm depth and for a 10 x 10 cm2 field, was between 0.9 mm and 7.2 mm for neutron energies 10-80 MeV.
Author Söderberg, J
Carlsson, G A
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: J
  surname: Söderberg
  fullname: Söderberg, J
  email: jonas.soderberg@imv.liu.se
  organization: Department of Radiation Physics, IMV, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden. jonas.soderberg@imv.liu.se
– sequence: 2
  givenname: G A
  surname: Carlsson
  fullname: Carlsson, G A
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11049184$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNo9kL1OwzAURj0U0R94AiTkiS2Nr2Mn9ogqCkhFLMCEFDnxTQlK7GI7Q98eCQrTkT4dfcNZkpnzDgm5ArYGplTOWAGZBilzIXNgeQHVjCz-1zlZxvjJGIDi4pzMAZjQoMSCvG9NTNThlIJ31DTRhwYttT4itX1MoW-m1HsXae9o-kCKDsP-SINxe6RsLTPF6IhvWWbok3cJ6caEwdOYJnu8IGedGSJenrgir9u7l81Dtnu-f9zc7rJWCEgZb3UjlRa2Q8kKYaHqEFplpBWdKjkY0YIxUhtUlUSuCiEahWXbqa4wutJ8RW5-fw_Bf00YUz32scVhMA79FOuKFyWUP-L1SZyaEW19CP1owrH-68G_AZVLYYM
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_abaa5f
crossref_primary_10_1088_0031_9155_52_16_016
crossref_primary_10_1088_0031_9155_48_20_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_zemedi_2016_07_001
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1088/0031-9155/45/10/317
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Biology
Physics
ExternalDocumentID 11049184
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-DZ
-~X
.GJ
.HR
02O
123
1JI
1PV
1WK
29O
3O-
4.4
53G
5B3
5RE
5VS
5ZH
5ZI
7.M
7.Q
9BW
AAGCD
AAGCF
AAJIO
AAJKP
AALHV
AATNI
ABCXL
ABHWH
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABQJV
ABTAH
ABVAM
ACAFW
ACGFS
ACHIP
ACWPO
AEFHF
AENEX
AERVB
AFFNX
AFYNE
AHSEE
AKPSB
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOAED
ARNYC
ASPBG
ATQHT
AVWKF
AZFZN
BBWZM
CBCFC
CEBXE
CGR
CJUJL
CRLBU
CS3
CUY
CVF
DU5
EBS
ECM
EDWGO
EIF
EJD
EMSAF
EPQRW
EQZZN
F5P
FEDTE
HAK
HVGLF
H~9
IHE
IJHAN
IOP
IZVLO
J5H
JCGBZ
KOT
LAP
M45
N5L
N9A
NPM
NT-
NT.
P2P
PJBAE
PKN
Q02
R4D
RIN
RKQ
RNS
RO9
ROL
RPA
S3P
SY9
T37
TN5
UCJ
W28
X7L
XPP
ZGI
ZMT
ZXP
ZY4
7X8
ACARI
ADEQX
AEINN
AGQPQ
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-2c9b5894dfe5034d17fe1c8a5d4f8621a4c1aa59ae875e28344b8e6cf8f3a9792
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISICitedReferencesCount 5
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000089865300017&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0031-9155
IngestDate Wed Oct 01 14:30:36 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:35:59 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 10
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c441t-2c9b5894dfe5034d17fe1c8a5d4f8621a4c1aa59ae875e28344b8e6cf8f3a9792
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 11049184
PQID 72361679
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_72361679
pubmed_primary_11049184
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2000-10-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2000-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2000
  text: 2000-10-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle Physics in medicine & biology
PublicationTitleAlternate Phys Med Biol
PublicationYear 2000
SSID ssj0011824
Score 1.6431834
Snippet Neutron pencil-beam absorbed dose distributions in phantoms of bone, ICRU soft tissue, muscle, adipose and the tissue substitutes water, A-150 (plastic) and...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 2987
SubjectTerms Acrylic Resins
Adipose Tissue - radiation effects
Bone and Bones - radiation effects
Fast Neutrons
Humans
Monte Carlo Method
Muscles - radiation effects
Neutrons
Phantoms, Imaging
Plastics
Radiometry - methods
Scattering, Radiation
Water
Title Fast neutron absorbed dose distributions in the energy range 0.5-80 meV--a Monte Carlo study
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11049184
https://www.proquest.com/docview/72361679
Volume 45
WOSCitedRecordID wos000089865300017&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8QwEB5WV8WL78f6zMFr3L7SNiCILC4e3MWDyh6EJc0DFrTVdhX8907SVi-CBy85BAolnU6-L5P5PoCzkEWKZYFPpQmcqHZIsyQx1MNBIMQ3wrhG4dtkPE4nE37XgYu2F8Zeq2xzokvUqpD2jLyfWJWQOOGXr2_UekbZ2mpjoLEA3RCBjI3pZPJTQ0DkXGswhz61Kuit5hBSvu-5fsQwb_TDxq_sV4Tpdprh-v_ecQPWGoRJruqQ2ISOzrdgufac_NyClVFTTcdJd_1TVtvwNBTVnOT63R6ME5FVRZlpRVRRaaKstG7jilWRWU4QMhLtWgZJaVsTiHfOcAsiL_qRUkFGVu-KDET5XBAnXrsDD8Pr-8ENbXwXqERwNKeB5BlLeaSMZl4YKT8x2pepYCoySIB8EUlfCMaFRrKjA-vUkaU6liY1oeAJD3ZhMS9yvQ_EF8hAlRdLL1NIBDnH7S9mMoziwMtSpXtw2q7kFOPaFitErov3atquZQ_26o8xfa3lN5CzIKtBYnrw57OHsOo6593duyPoGvyj9TEsyY_5rCpPXLjgOL4bfQHTgcar
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fast+neutron+absorbed+dose+distributions+in+the+energy+range+0.5-80+meV--a+Monte+Carlo+study&rft.jtitle=Physics+in+medicine+%26+biology&rft.au=S%C3%B6derberg%2C+J&rft.au=Carlsson%2C+G+A&rft.date=2000-10-01&rft.issn=0031-9155&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2987&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088%2F0031-9155%2F45%2F10%2F317&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0031-9155&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0031-9155&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0031-9155&client=summon