Peer reviewers’ dilemmas: a qualitative exploration of decisional conflict in the evaluation of grant applications in the medical humanities and social sciences

Independent evaluations of grant applications by subject experts are an important part of the peer-review system. However, little is known about the real-time experiences of peer reviewers or experts who perform reviews of a grant application independently. This study sought to gain insight into thi...

Celý popis

Podrobná bibliografia

Vydané v:	Humanities & social sciences communications Ročník 9; číslo 1; s. 1 - 11
Hlavní autori:	Vallée-Tourangeau, Gaëlle, Wheelock, Ana, Vandrevala, Tushna, Harries, Priscilla
Médium:	Journal Article
Jazyk:	English
Vydavateľské údaje:	England Springer Nature B.V 04.03.2022 Springer Nature
Predmet:	Academic staff Applicants Application Evaluation Experts Grants Habits Humanities Interviews Peer review Peers Prestige Social sciences Thinking aloud
ISSN:	2662-9992, 2662-9992
On-line prístup:	Získať plný text
Tagy:	Pridať tag Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!