Peer reviewers’ dilemmas: a qualitative exploration of decisional conflict in the evaluation of grant applications in the medical humanities and social sciences

Independent evaluations of grant applications by subject experts are an important part of the peer-review system. However, little is known about the real-time experiences of peer reviewers or experts who perform reviews of a grant application independently. This study sought to gain insight into thi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details

Published in:	Humanities & social sciences communications Vol. 9; no. 1; pp. 1 - 11
Main Authors:	Vallée-Tourangeau, Gaëlle, Wheelock, Ana, Vandrevala, Tushna, Harries, Priscilla
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	England Springer Nature B.V 04.03.2022 Springer Nature
Subjects:	Academic staff Applicants Application Evaluation Experts Grants Habits Humanities Interviews Peer review Peers Prestige Social sciences Thinking aloud
ISSN:	2662-9992, 2662-9992
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!