Peer reviewers’ dilemmas: a qualitative exploration of decisional conflict in the evaluation of grant applications in the medical humanities and social sciences

Independent evaluations of grant applications by subject experts are an important part of the peer-review system. However, little is known about the real-time experiences of peer reviewers or experts who perform reviews of a grant application independently. This study sought to gain insight into thi...

Celý popis

Podrobná bibliografie

Vydáno v:	Humanities & social sciences communications Ročník 9; číslo 1; s. 1 - 11
Hlavní autoři:	Vallée-Tourangeau, Gaëlle, Wheelock, Ana, Vandrevala, Tushna, Harries, Priscilla
Médium:	Journal Article
Jazyk:	angličtina
Vydáno:	England Springer Nature B.V 04.03.2022 Springer Nature
Témata:	Academic staff Applicants Application Evaluation Experts Grants Habits Humanities Interviews Peer review Peers Prestige Social sciences Thinking aloud
ISSN:	2662-9992, 2662-9992
On-line přístup:	Získat plný text
Tagy:	Přidat tag Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!