Scoping Review on Rehabilitation Scoping Reviews
To examine the extent, scope, and methodological quality of rehabilitation scoping reviews. A comprehensive list of scoping reviews conducted in the broader health field (inception to July 2014), with a further update of that list (up to February 2017) using similar methods, including searching 9 el...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Jg. 101; H. 8; S. 1462 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
United States
01.08.2020
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 1532-821X, 1532-821X |
| Online-Zugang: | Weitere Angaben |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Abstract | To examine the extent, scope, and methodological quality of rehabilitation scoping reviews.
A comprehensive list of scoping reviews conducted in the broader health field (inception to July 2014), with a further update of that list (up to February 2017) using similar methods, including searching 9 electronic databases.
Articles were included if they were scoping reviews within rehabilitation. Established review methods were used including (1) a PubMed filter detecting rehabilitation content and (2) title-and-abstract screening by 2 independent reviewers applied sequentially to articles from the existing list of scoping reviews and to the updated search results. Full-text articles were reviewed by 1 reviewer, with discrepancies resolved by another after pilot screening with > 80% agreement. Remaining discrepancies were resolved by external experts.
Two independent reviewers used piloted and standardized data extraction forms.
We screened 1823 records, including 992 full texts, to identify 251 rehabilitation-related scoping reviews. Rehabilitation scoping reviews had an exponential yearly increase since 2008 (r
=0.89; P<.01). The literature addressed diverse topics (eg, spread over 43 condition groupings); 43% were published in Canada. Examples of methodological limitations included: 39% of reviews did not cite the use of a methodological framework, 96% did not include the appropriate flow diagram, 8% did not report eligibility criteria, and 57% did not report data extraction details.
The increasing popularity of scoping reviews in rehabilitation has not been met by high standards in methodological quality. To increase the value of rehabilitation scoping reviews, rehabilitation stakeholders need to use existing methodological standards for the conduct, reporting, and appraisal of scoping reviews. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | To examine the extent, scope, and methodological quality of rehabilitation scoping reviews.
A comprehensive list of scoping reviews conducted in the broader health field (inception to July 2014), with a further update of that list (up to February 2017) using similar methods, including searching 9 electronic databases.
Articles were included if they were scoping reviews within rehabilitation. Established review methods were used including (1) a PubMed filter detecting rehabilitation content and (2) title-and-abstract screening by 2 independent reviewers applied sequentially to articles from the existing list of scoping reviews and to the updated search results. Full-text articles were reviewed by 1 reviewer, with discrepancies resolved by another after pilot screening with > 80% agreement. Remaining discrepancies were resolved by external experts.
Two independent reviewers used piloted and standardized data extraction forms.
We screened 1823 records, including 992 full texts, to identify 251 rehabilitation-related scoping reviews. Rehabilitation scoping reviews had an exponential yearly increase since 2008 (r
=0.89; P<.01). The literature addressed diverse topics (eg, spread over 43 condition groupings); 43% were published in Canada. Examples of methodological limitations included: 39% of reviews did not cite the use of a methodological framework, 96% did not include the appropriate flow diagram, 8% did not report eligibility criteria, and 57% did not report data extraction details.
The increasing popularity of scoping reviews in rehabilitation has not been met by high standards in methodological quality. To increase the value of rehabilitation scoping reviews, rehabilitation stakeholders need to use existing methodological standards for the conduct, reporting, and appraisal of scoping reviews. To examine the extent, scope, and methodological quality of rehabilitation scoping reviews.OBJECTIVETo examine the extent, scope, and methodological quality of rehabilitation scoping reviews.A comprehensive list of scoping reviews conducted in the broader health field (inception to July 2014), with a further update of that list (up to February 2017) using similar methods, including searching 9 electronic databases.DATA SOURCESA comprehensive list of scoping reviews conducted in the broader health field (inception to July 2014), with a further update of that list (up to February 2017) using similar methods, including searching 9 electronic databases.Articles were included if they were scoping reviews within rehabilitation. Established review methods were used including (1) a PubMed filter detecting rehabilitation content and (2) title-and-abstract screening by 2 independent reviewers applied sequentially to articles from the existing list of scoping reviews and to the updated search results. Full-text articles were reviewed by 1 reviewer, with discrepancies resolved by another after pilot screening with > 80% agreement. Remaining discrepancies were resolved by external experts.STUDY SELECTIONArticles were included if they were scoping reviews within rehabilitation. Established review methods were used including (1) a PubMed filter detecting rehabilitation content and (2) title-and-abstract screening by 2 independent reviewers applied sequentially to articles from the existing list of scoping reviews and to the updated search results. Full-text articles were reviewed by 1 reviewer, with discrepancies resolved by another after pilot screening with > 80% agreement. Remaining discrepancies were resolved by external experts.Two independent reviewers used piloted and standardized data extraction forms.DATA EXTRACTIONTwo independent reviewers used piloted and standardized data extraction forms.We screened 1823 records, including 992 full texts, to identify 251 rehabilitation-related scoping reviews. Rehabilitation scoping reviews had an exponential yearly increase since 2008 (r2=0.89; P<.01). The literature addressed diverse topics (eg, spread over 43 condition groupings); 43% were published in Canada. Examples of methodological limitations included: 39% of reviews did not cite the use of a methodological framework, 96% did not include the appropriate flow diagram, 8% did not report eligibility criteria, and 57% did not report data extraction details.DATA SYNTHESISWe screened 1823 records, including 992 full texts, to identify 251 rehabilitation-related scoping reviews. Rehabilitation scoping reviews had an exponential yearly increase since 2008 (r2=0.89; P<.01). The literature addressed diverse topics (eg, spread over 43 condition groupings); 43% were published in Canada. Examples of methodological limitations included: 39% of reviews did not cite the use of a methodological framework, 96% did not include the appropriate flow diagram, 8% did not report eligibility criteria, and 57% did not report data extraction details.The increasing popularity of scoping reviews in rehabilitation has not been met by high standards in methodological quality. To increase the value of rehabilitation scoping reviews, rehabilitation stakeholders need to use existing methodological standards for the conduct, reporting, and appraisal of scoping reviews.CONCLUSIONSThe increasing popularity of scoping reviews in rehabilitation has not been met by high standards in methodological quality. To increase the value of rehabilitation scoping reviews, rehabilitation stakeholders need to use existing methodological standards for the conduct, reporting, and appraisal of scoping reviews. |
| Author | Lillie, Erin Tricco, Andrea C Hitzig, Sander L Colquhoun, Heather L Rotenberg, Shlomit Zarin, Wasifa Straus, Sharon E Jesus, Tiago S O'Brien, Kelly K Engel, Lisa Seaton, Samantha Chui, Adora |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Heather L surname: Colquhoun fullname: Colquhoun, Heather L email: heather.colquhoun@utoronto.ca organization: Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Rehabilitation Sciences Institute (RSI), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: heather.colquhoun@utoronto.ca – sequence: 2 givenname: Tiago S surname: Jesus fullname: Jesus, Tiago S organization: Global Health and Tropical Medicine and WHO Collaborating Centre for Health Workforce Policy and Planning, Institute of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine - NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal – sequence: 3 givenname: Kelly K surname: O'Brien fullname: O'Brien, Kelly K organization: Rehabilitation Sciences Institute (RSI), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada – sequence: 4 givenname: Andrea C surname: Tricco fullname: Tricco, Andrea C organization: Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada – sequence: 5 givenname: Adora surname: Chui fullname: Chui, Adora organization: Rehabilitation Sciences Institute (RSI), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest, Toronto, Ontario, Canada – sequence: 6 givenname: Wasifa surname: Zarin fullname: Zarin, Wasifa organization: Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada – sequence: 7 givenname: Erin surname: Lillie fullname: Lillie, Erin organization: Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada – sequence: 8 givenname: Sander L surname: Hitzig fullname: Hitzig, Sander L organization: Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Rehabilitation Sciences Institute (RSI), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; St. John's Rehab Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada – sequence: 9 givenname: Samantha surname: Seaton fullname: Seaton, Samantha organization: Rehabilitation Sciences Institute (RSI), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada – sequence: 10 givenname: Lisa surname: Engel fullname: Engel, Lisa organization: Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada – sequence: 11 givenname: Shlomit surname: Rotenberg fullname: Rotenberg, Shlomit organization: Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest, Toronto, Ontario, Canada – sequence: 12 givenname: Sharon E surname: Straus fullname: Straus, Sharon E organization: Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32325163$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNpVj8lKxEAURQtpsQf9ARfSSzeJr-aqpTRO0CA4gLtQqbxoNZlMJYp_b8AWdHXvhcuBsySzpm2QkFMKKQWqLnap6-o-ZcAgBZ4ClQdkQSVniWH0Zfanz8kyxh0AKMnpEZlzxpmkii8IPPq2C83r-gE_An6u22Zqby4PVRjcEKb5_xCPyWHpqogn-1yR5-urp81tsr2_udtcbhMvBAyJttwa6fJCWqQWtDW-EFAYg6gQjdGC577wmjMKYFQpealsKagWwjJlKFuR8x9u17fvI8Yhq0P0WFWuwXaMGeNWTFw92a_I2f465jUWWdeH2vVf2a8l-wY62VTt |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1177_15394492241292438 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphar_2022_748931 crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2022_1052294 crossref_primary_10_1097_AJP_0000000000000891 crossref_primary_10_7748_nr_2025_e1963 crossref_primary_10_1111_hsc_14096 crossref_primary_10_1111_medu_14431 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apmr_2021_05_005 crossref_primary_10_1097_PHM_0000000000001763 crossref_primary_10_1080_09602011_2024_2381874 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2023_080878 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apmr_2020_09_396 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph18084348 crossref_primary_10_1111_1440_1630_70003 crossref_primary_10_1097_PHM_0000000000002490 crossref_primary_10_3233_WOR_210777 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2022_916602 crossref_primary_10_5014_ajot_2023_050089 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph19127327 crossref_primary_10_1111_medu_14543 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2021_052942 crossref_primary_10_1002_hpm_3691 crossref_primary_10_3389_fresc_2022_849216 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12939_021_01526_y crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0323344 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclinepi_2025_111928 crossref_primary_10_1080_09638288_2023_2243583 crossref_primary_10_1080_02699052_2024_2337905 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph19095307 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph18126178 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Copyright © 2020 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2020 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
| DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.03.015 |
| DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | no_fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine Physical Therapy |
| EISSN | 1532-821X |
| ExternalDocumentID | 32325163 |
| Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Scoping Review |
| GroupedDBID | --- --K -~X .1- .55 .FO .GJ 07C 0R~ 1B1 1CY 1P~ 1~5 23N 3O- 4.4 41~ 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 6J9 7-5 AAEDT AAEDW AALRI AAQFI AAQOH AAQQT AAQXK AAWTL AAXUO AAYWO ABDQB ABFRF ABJNI ABLJU ABMAC ABOCM ABWVN ACBNA ACGFO ACGUR ACRPL ADBBV ADMUD ADNMO ADRMJ AEFWE AENEX AEVXI AFCTW AFFNX AFJKZ AFRHN AFTJW AGCQF AGNAY AGQPQ AI. AIGII AITUG AJUYK AKRWK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ APXCP ASPBG AVWKF AZFZN BELOY BR6 C5W CAG CGR COF CS3 CUY CVF E3Z EBS ECM EFJIC EFKBS EIF EJD F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID G-Q GBLVA HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W J5H K-O KOM KOO L7B M41 MO0 N4W NEJ NPM NQ- O-3 O9- OH. OHT OK1 OT. P2P QTD QZG R2- RIG ROL RPZ SEL SES SJN SKT SSZ TWZ UDS UGJ UHB UHS UPT UQV UV1 VH1 WH7 WHG X7M XH2 XOL YQJ YRY YZZ Z5R ZGI ZXP ~S- 7X8 ABUFD |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-793985abd59e190798cd40d88ee6ee88743bcdc73210086f53f69f41744926812 |
| IEDL.DBID | 7X8 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 36 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000554905500020&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1532-821X |
| IngestDate | Sun Nov 09 10:13:42 EST 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:27:06 EDT 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 8 |
| Keywords | Rehabilitation Review |
| Language | English |
| License | Copyright © 2020 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c440t-793985abd59e190798cd40d88ee6ee88743bcdc73210086f53f69f41744926812 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
| PMID | 32325163 |
| PQID | 2394907720 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2394907720 pubmed_primary_32325163 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2020-08-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-08-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2020 text: 2020-08-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Arch Phys Med Rehabil |
| PublicationYear | 2020 |
| References | 33248686 - Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Feb;102(2):340. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.09.396 33334548 - Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Feb;102(2):340-342. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.10.121 |
| References_xml | – reference: 33248686 - Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Feb;102(2):340. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.09.396 – reference: 33334548 - Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Feb;102(2):340-342. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.10.121 |
| SSID | ssj0006531 |
| Score | 2.484274 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | To examine the extent, scope, and methodological quality of rehabilitation scoping reviews.
A comprehensive list of scoping reviews conducted in the broader... To examine the extent, scope, and methodological quality of rehabilitation scoping reviews.OBJECTIVETo examine the extent, scope, and methodological quality of... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
| StartPage | 1462 |
| SubjectTerms | Humans Rehabilitation Research Design - standards Scholarly Communication - trends Scoping Reviews As Topic |
| Title | Scoping Review on Rehabilitation Scoping Reviews |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32325163 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2394907720 |
| Volume | 101 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000554905500020&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8QwEB7UFfHi6vpaX1TwGkyT9JGTiLh4cJcFV-itNGkCHmxXu_r7nbRZVg-C4KX00EKZzEy_yWS-D-BKShWLyHJCTSqJSBknUktKpFVlGGutE9Wqljwmk0maZXLqN9waf6xymRPbRF3W2u2RXzsJbyzkEkZv5m_EqUa57qqX0FiHHkco4wIzyVZs4XHEPV8qRj0LMz80053vKuavjg-U0ZbkNIx-h5jtr2bU_-9H7sKOB5nBbecVe7BmqgFsjX0bfQD9qV-dYNaRCuwDfdLt6FTQNQuCusK77yTewc8HmgN4Ht3P7h6IV1MgWgi6IBiIMo0KVUbSIApIpJMtomWaGhMbg7lGcKVLnbihHqxzbMRtLK3AisVxCiIOOISNqq7MMQRMKyosV6xkpeBCIchUgtuSca5DroohXC7Nk6O3uhZEUZn6o8lXBhrCUWfjfN7RauQcwV2E8PDkD2-fwrZbuu4k3hn0LMaqOYdN_bl4ad4vWjfA62Q6_gJjsrpQ |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scoping+Review+on+Rehabilitation+Scoping+Reviews&rft.jtitle=Archives+of+physical+medicine+and+rehabilitation&rft.au=Colquhoun%2C+Heather+L&rft.au=Jesus%2C+Tiago+S&rft.au=O%27Brien%2C+Kelly+K&rft.au=Tricco%2C+Andrea+C&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.issn=1532-821X&rft.eissn=1532-821X&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1462&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.apmr.2020.03.015&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1532-821X&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1532-821X&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1532-821X&client=summon |