Universal late pregnancy ultrasound screening to predict adverse outcomes in nulliparous women: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis
Currently, pregnant women are screened using ultrasound to perform gestational aging, typically at around 12 weeks' gestation, and around the middle of pregnancy. Ultrasound scans thereafter are performed for clinical indications only. We sought to assess the case for offering universal late pr...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) Jg. 25; H. 15; S. 1 - 190 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
England
NIHR Journals Library
01.02.2021
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 1366-5278, 2046-4924, 2046-4924 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Abstract | Currently, pregnant women are screened using ultrasound to perform gestational aging, typically at around 12 weeks' gestation, and around the middle of pregnancy. Ultrasound scans thereafter are performed for clinical indications only.
We sought to assess the case for offering universal late pregnancy ultrasound to all nulliparous women in the UK. The main questions addressed were the diagnostic effectiveness of universal late pregnancy ultrasound to predict adverse outcomes and the cost-effectiveness of either implementing universal ultrasound or conducting further research in this area.
We performed diagnostic test accuracy reviews of five ultrasonic measurements in late pregnancy. We conducted cost-effectiveness and value-of-information analyses of screening for fetal presentation, screening for small for gestational age fetuses and screening for large for gestational age fetuses. Finally, we conducted a survey and a focus group to determine the willingness of women to participate in a future randomised controlled trial.
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library from inception to June 2019.
The protocol for the review was designed a priori and registered. Eligible studies were identified using keywords, with no restrictions for language or location. The risk of bias in studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Health economic modelling employed a decision tree analysed via Monte Carlo simulation. Health outcomes were from the fetal perspective and presented as quality-adjusted life-years. Costs were from the perspective of the public sector, defined as NHS England, and the costs of special educational needs. All costs and quality-adjusted life-years were discounted by 3.5% per annum and the reference case time horizon was 20 years.
Umbilical artery Doppler flow velocimetry, cerebroplacental ratio, severe oligohydramnios and borderline oligohydramnios were all either non-predictive or weakly predictive of the risk of neonatal morbidity (summary positive likelihood ratios between 1 and 2) and were all weakly predictive of the risk of delivering a small for gestational age infant (summary positive likelihood ratios between 2 and 4). Suspicion of fetal macrosomia is strongly predictive of the risk of delivering a large infant, but it is only weakly, albeit statistically significantly, predictive of the risk of shoulder dystocia. Very few studies blinded the result of the ultrasound scan and most studies were rated as being at a high risk of bias as a result of treatment paradox, ascertainment bias or iatrogenic harm. Health economic analysis indicated that universal ultrasound for fetal presentation only may be both clinically and economically justified on the basis of existing evidence. Universal ultrasound including fetal biometry was of borderline cost-effectiveness and was sensitive to assumptions. Value-of-information analysis indicated that the parameter that had the largest impact on decision uncertainty was the net difference in cost between an induced delivery and expectant management.
The primary literature on the diagnostic effectiveness of ultrasound in late pregnancy is weak. Value-of-information analysis may have underestimated the uncertainty in the literature as it was focused on the internal validity of parameters, which is quantified, whereas the greatest uncertainty may be in the external validity to the research question, which is unquantified.
Universal screening for presentation at term may be justified on the basis of current knowledge. The current literature does not support universal ultrasonic screening for fetal growth disorders.
We describe proof-of-principle randomised controlled trials that could better inform the case for screening using ultrasound in late pregnancy.
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42017064093.
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in
; Vol. 25, No. 15. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Ultrasound scans allow doctors to check on the health of an unborn infant. Usually, all pregnant women receive a scan at about 3 months and about 5 months of pregnancy. After that, women are offered a scan during birth only if they have risk factors or if a problem develops. Problems can arise in the later stages of pregnancy, including issues with the infant’s growth or whether or not the infant is breech. Some of these problems may be prevented if a scan is carried out, but scans can also be inaccurate. When they are, a woman may receive unnecessary treatment, which could even harm her or her infant. In this study we set out to review previous research about how good ultrasound scanning is at detecting infants who may be born with a condition. This study focused on detecting if the infant was too big or too small. Unfortunately, much of the previous research was not carried out to a high standard. Scanning can detect the size of a infant relatively well, but it is much less clear if scanning can predict complications that may harm the infant during birth. We also studied the costs and outcomes of scanning. We calculated the extra cost required to scan every woman and compared this with the extra benefits from preventing complications. One thing that ultrasound scans detect is whether the infant is presenting head first or bottom first (a ‘breech presentation’), as infants presenting breech have high risks of complications. Scanning all women to check whether or not their infant is presenting breech seems to be cost-effective and the cost savings may even be higher than the cost of implementation, although this depends on how much the scan would cost. Whether or not it is worthwhile scanning all infants to see if they are above or below the thresholds for normal size is less clear. A larger research study could provide more reliable numbers from which to draw a conclusion. We show how such a study could be designed, so that a single study could tell us both how well scans can predict adverse outcomes and how helpful this information is. Currently, pregnant women are screened using ultrasound to perform gestational aging, typically at around 12 weeks' gestation, and around the middle of pregnancy. Ultrasound scans thereafter are performed for clinical indications only. We sought to assess the case for offering universal late pregnancy ultrasound to all nulliparous women in the UK. The main questions addressed were the diagnostic effectiveness of universal late pregnancy ultrasound to predict adverse outcomes and the cost-effectiveness of either implementing universal ultrasound or conducting further research in this area. We performed diagnostic test accuracy reviews of five ultrasonic measurements in late pregnancy. We conducted cost-effectiveness and value-of-information analyses of screening for fetal presentation, screening for small for gestational age fetuses and screening for large for gestational age fetuses. Finally, we conducted a survey and a focus group to determine the willingness of women to participate in a future randomised controlled trial. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library from inception to June 2019. The protocol for the review was designed a priori and registered. Eligible studies were identified using keywords, with no restrictions for language or location. The risk of bias in studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Health economic modelling employed a decision tree analysed via Monte Carlo simulation. Health outcomes were from the fetal perspective and presented as quality-adjusted life-years. Costs were from the perspective of the public sector, defined as NHS England, and the costs of special educational needs. All costs and quality-adjusted life-years were discounted by 3.5% per annum and the reference case time horizon was 20 years. Umbilical artery Doppler flow velocimetry, cerebroplacental ratio, severe oligohydramnios and borderline oligohydramnios were all either non-predictive or weakly predictive of the risk of neonatal morbidity (summary positive likelihood ratios between 1 and 2) and were all weakly predictive of the risk of delivering a small for gestational age infant (summary positive likelihood ratios between 2 and 4). Suspicion of fetal macrosomia is strongly predictive of the risk of delivering a large infant, but it is only weakly, albeit statistically significantly, predictive of the risk of shoulder dystocia. Very few studies blinded the result of the ultrasound scan and most studies were rated as being at a high risk of bias as a result of treatment paradox, ascertainment bias or iatrogenic harm. Health economic analysis indicated that universal ultrasound for fetal presentation only may be both clinically and economically justified on the basis of existing evidence. Universal ultrasound including fetal biometry was of borderline cost-effectiveness and was sensitive to assumptions. Value-of-information analysis indicated that the parameter that had the largest impact on decision uncertainty was the net difference in cost between an induced delivery and expectant management. The primary literature on the diagnostic effectiveness of ultrasound in late pregnancy is weak. Value-of-information analysis may have underestimated the uncertainty in the literature as it was focused on the internal validity of parameters, which is quantified, whereas the greatest uncertainty may be in the external validity to the research question, which is unquantified. Universal screening for presentation at term may be justified on the basis of current knowledge. The current literature does not support universal ultrasonic screening for fetal growth disorders. We describe proof-of-principle randomised controlled trials that could better inform the case for screening using ultrasound in late pregnancy. This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42017064093. This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in ; Vol. 25, No. 15. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. Currently, pregnant women are screened using ultrasound to perform gestational aging, typically at around 12 weeks' gestation, and around the middle of pregnancy. Ultrasound scans thereafter are performed for clinical indications only.BACKGROUNDCurrently, pregnant women are screened using ultrasound to perform gestational aging, typically at around 12 weeks' gestation, and around the middle of pregnancy. Ultrasound scans thereafter are performed for clinical indications only.We sought to assess the case for offering universal late pregnancy ultrasound to all nulliparous women in the UK. The main questions addressed were the diagnostic effectiveness of universal late pregnancy ultrasound to predict adverse outcomes and the cost-effectiveness of either implementing universal ultrasound or conducting further research in this area.OBJECTIVESWe sought to assess the case for offering universal late pregnancy ultrasound to all nulliparous women in the UK. The main questions addressed were the diagnostic effectiveness of universal late pregnancy ultrasound to predict adverse outcomes and the cost-effectiveness of either implementing universal ultrasound or conducting further research in this area.We performed diagnostic test accuracy reviews of five ultrasonic measurements in late pregnancy. We conducted cost-effectiveness and value-of-information analyses of screening for fetal presentation, screening for small for gestational age fetuses and screening for large for gestational age fetuses. Finally, we conducted a survey and a focus group to determine the willingness of women to participate in a future randomised controlled trial.DESIGNWe performed diagnostic test accuracy reviews of five ultrasonic measurements in late pregnancy. We conducted cost-effectiveness and value-of-information analyses of screening for fetal presentation, screening for small for gestational age fetuses and screening for large for gestational age fetuses. Finally, we conducted a survey and a focus group to determine the willingness of women to participate in a future randomised controlled trial.We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library from inception to June 2019.DATA SOURCESWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library from inception to June 2019.The protocol for the review was designed a priori and registered. Eligible studies were identified using keywords, with no restrictions for language or location. The risk of bias in studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Health economic modelling employed a decision tree analysed via Monte Carlo simulation. Health outcomes were from the fetal perspective and presented as quality-adjusted life-years. Costs were from the perspective of the public sector, defined as NHS England, and the costs of special educational needs. All costs and quality-adjusted life-years were discounted by 3.5% per annum and the reference case time horizon was 20 years.REVIEW METHODSThe protocol for the review was designed a priori and registered. Eligible studies were identified using keywords, with no restrictions for language or location. The risk of bias in studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Health economic modelling employed a decision tree analysed via Monte Carlo simulation. Health outcomes were from the fetal perspective and presented as quality-adjusted life-years. Costs were from the perspective of the public sector, defined as NHS England, and the costs of special educational needs. All costs and quality-adjusted life-years were discounted by 3.5% per annum and the reference case time horizon was 20 years.Umbilical artery Doppler flow velocimetry, cerebroplacental ratio, severe oligohydramnios and borderline oligohydramnios were all either non-predictive or weakly predictive of the risk of neonatal morbidity (summary positive likelihood ratios between 1 and 2) and were all weakly predictive of the risk of delivering a small for gestational age infant (summary positive likelihood ratios between 2 and 4). Suspicion of fetal macrosomia is strongly predictive of the risk of delivering a large infant, but it is only weakly, albeit statistically significantly, predictive of the risk of shoulder dystocia. Very few studies blinded the result of the ultrasound scan and most studies were rated as being at a high risk of bias as a result of treatment paradox, ascertainment bias or iatrogenic harm. Health economic analysis indicated that universal ultrasound for fetal presentation only may be both clinically and economically justified on the basis of existing evidence. Universal ultrasound including fetal biometry was of borderline cost-effectiveness and was sensitive to assumptions. Value-of-information analysis indicated that the parameter that had the largest impact on decision uncertainty was the net difference in cost between an induced delivery and expectant management.RESULTSUmbilical artery Doppler flow velocimetry, cerebroplacental ratio, severe oligohydramnios and borderline oligohydramnios were all either non-predictive or weakly predictive of the risk of neonatal morbidity (summary positive likelihood ratios between 1 and 2) and were all weakly predictive of the risk of delivering a small for gestational age infant (summary positive likelihood ratios between 2 and 4). Suspicion of fetal macrosomia is strongly predictive of the risk of delivering a large infant, but it is only weakly, albeit statistically significantly, predictive of the risk of shoulder dystocia. Very few studies blinded the result of the ultrasound scan and most studies were rated as being at a high risk of bias as a result of treatment paradox, ascertainment bias or iatrogenic harm. Health economic analysis indicated that universal ultrasound for fetal presentation only may be both clinically and economically justified on the basis of existing evidence. Universal ultrasound including fetal biometry was of borderline cost-effectiveness and was sensitive to assumptions. Value-of-information analysis indicated that the parameter that had the largest impact on decision uncertainty was the net difference in cost between an induced delivery and expectant management.The primary literature on the diagnostic effectiveness of ultrasound in late pregnancy is weak. Value-of-information analysis may have underestimated the uncertainty in the literature as it was focused on the internal validity of parameters, which is quantified, whereas the greatest uncertainty may be in the external validity to the research question, which is unquantified.LIMITATIONSThe primary literature on the diagnostic effectiveness of ultrasound in late pregnancy is weak. Value-of-information analysis may have underestimated the uncertainty in the literature as it was focused on the internal validity of parameters, which is quantified, whereas the greatest uncertainty may be in the external validity to the research question, which is unquantified.Universal screening for presentation at term may be justified on the basis of current knowledge. The current literature does not support universal ultrasonic screening for fetal growth disorders.CONCLUSIONSUniversal screening for presentation at term may be justified on the basis of current knowledge. The current literature does not support universal ultrasonic screening for fetal growth disorders.We describe proof-of-principle randomised controlled trials that could better inform the case for screening using ultrasound in late pregnancy.FUTURE WORKWe describe proof-of-principle randomised controlled trials that could better inform the case for screening using ultrasound in late pregnancy.This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42017064093.STUDY REGISTRATIONThis study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42017064093.This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 15. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.FUNDINGThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 15. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. Background: Currently, pregnant women are screened using ultrasound to perform gestational aging, typically at around 12 weeks’ gestation, and around the middle of pregnancy. Ultrasound scans thereafter are performed for clinical indications only. Objectives: We sought to assess the case for offering universal late pregnancy ultrasound to all nulliparous women in the UK. The main questions addressed were the diagnostic effectiveness of universal late pregnancy ultrasound to predict adverse outcomes and the cost-effectiveness of either implementing universal ultrasound or conducting further research in this area. Design: We performed diagnostic test accuracy reviews of five ultrasonic measurements in late pregnancy. We conducted cost-effectiveness and value-of-information analyses of screening for fetal presentation, screening for small for gestational age fetuses and screening for large for gestational age fetuses. Finally, we conducted a survey and a focus group to determine the willingness of women to participate in a future randomised controlled trial. Data sources: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library from inception to June 2019. Review methods: The protocol for the review was designed a priori and registered. Eligible studies were identified using keywords, with no restrictions for language or location. The risk of bias in studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Health economic modelling employed a decision tree analysed via Monte Carlo simulation. Health outcomes were from the fetal perspective and presented as quality-adjusted life-years. Costs were from the perspective of the public sector, defined as NHS England, and the costs of special educational needs. All costs and quality-adjusted life-years were discounted by 3.5% per annum and the reference case time horizon was 20 years. Results: Umbilical artery Doppler flow velocimetry, cerebroplacental ratio, severe oligohydramnios and borderline oligohydramnios were all either non-predictive or weakly predictive of the risk of neonatal morbidity (summary positive likelihood ratios between 1 and 2) and were all weakly predictive of the risk of delivering a small for gestational age infant (summary positive likelihood ratios between 2 and 4). Suspicion of fetal macrosomia is strongly predictive of the risk of delivering a large infant, but it is only weakly, albeit statistically significantly, predictive of the risk of shoulder dystocia. Very few studies blinded the result of the ultrasound scan and most studies were rated as being at a high risk of bias as a result of treatment paradox, ascertainment bias or iatrogenic harm. Health economic analysis indicated that universal ultrasound for fetal presentation only may be both clinically and economically justified on the basis of existing evidence. Universal ultrasound including fetal biometry was of borderline cost-effectiveness and was sensitive to assumptions. Value-of-information analysis indicated that the parameter that had the largest impact on decision uncertainty was the net difference in cost between an induced delivery and expectant management. Limitations: The primary literature on the diagnostic effectiveness of ultrasound in late pregnancy is weak. Value-of-information analysis may have underestimated the uncertainty in the literature as it was focused on the internal validity of parameters, which is quantified, whereas the greatest uncertainty may be in the external validity to the research question, which is unquantified. Conclusions: Universal screening for presentation at term may be justified on the basis of current knowledge. The current literature does not support universal ultrasonic screening for fetal growth disorders. Future work: We describe proof-of-principle randomised controlled trials that could better inform the case for screening using ultrasound in late pregnancy. Study registration: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42017064093. Funding: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 15. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. |
| Author | Heazell, Alexander EP Wilson, Edward CF Papageorghiou, Aris Robson, Stephen C Sovio, Ulla Moraitis, Alexandros A Brocklehurst, Peter Thornton, Jim G Sanders, Julia Smith, Gordon CS Wastlund, David |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Gordon CS orcidid: 0000-0003-2124-0997 surname: Smith fullname: Smith, Gordon CS organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK – sequence: 2 givenname: Alexandros A orcidid: 0000-0003-4634-1129 surname: Moraitis fullname: Moraitis, Alexandros A organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK – sequence: 3 givenname: David orcidid: 0000-0002-5074-4740 surname: Wastlund fullname: Wastlund, David organization: The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK – sequence: 4 givenname: Jim G orcidid: 0000-0001-9764-6876 surname: Thornton fullname: Thornton, Jim G organization: Division of Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK – sequence: 5 givenname: Aris orcidid: 0000-0001-8143-2232 surname: Papageorghiou fullname: Papageorghiou, Aris organization: Nuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK – sequence: 6 givenname: Julia orcidid: 0000-0001-5712-9989 surname: Sanders fullname: Sanders, Julia organization: School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK – sequence: 7 givenname: Alexander EP orcidid: 0000-0002-4303-7845 surname: Heazell fullname: Heazell, Alexander EP organization: Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK – sequence: 8 givenname: Stephen C orcidid: 0000-0001-7897-7987 surname: Robson fullname: Robson, Stephen C organization: Reproductive and Vascular Biology Group, The Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK – sequence: 9 givenname: Ulla orcidid: 0000-0002-0799-1105 surname: Sovio fullname: Sovio, Ulla organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK – sequence: 10 givenname: Peter orcidid: 0000-0002-9950-6751 surname: Brocklehurst fullname: Brocklehurst, Peter organization: Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK – sequence: 11 givenname: Edward CF orcidid: 0000-0002-8369-1577 surname: Wilson fullname: Wilson, Edward CF organization: The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, Health Economics Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33656977$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNplkk1rHDEMhoeS0mzSQn9B8bGXScfj8VcPhRL6EQj00pyN19ZsHDz21vZs2N-RP1xPN5s29CSQXj2vkHTWnIQYoGne4u6CENx9uC26p5h2L5pV3w2sHWQ_nDQrTBhrac_FaXOW813XDZhR_Ko5JYRRJjlfNQ83we0gZe2R1wXQNsEm6GD2aPYl6RznYFE2CSC4sEElLgrrTEHaLn2A4lxMnCAjF1CYvXdbneKc0X1Nho9Io7zPBSZdnEEJdg7uka5ME3NpYRzBlDpAgJxrWvt9dvl183LUPsObx3je3Hz98vPye3v949vV5efr1gxElFYwTOQ4jgyvpR0soYJgKjAbOeeEWyaHjoyGA--4sUZQ24Plo1zKRmDA5Ly5OnBt1Hdqm9yk015F7dSfREwbpVMd24NiFASWvMdrygeyFloSSSVn2kgmiGCV9enA2s7rCayBULfnn0GfV4K7VZu4U1xS0Q-0At4_AlL8NUMuanLZgPc6QF2n6gfJ8XJQXqXv_vV6MjletQouDgKTYs4JRmVcqQeIi7XzCndqeRt1fJu_5k8NR-Z_0t8JKcYR |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2022_959750 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jval_2025_01_013 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pmed_1004192 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2022_07_051 crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_26035 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_33131 crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_29130 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajogmf_2022_100782 crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_26091 crossref_primary_10_1038_s44294_024_00015_1 crossref_primary_10_1111_1471_0528_17814 crossref_primary_10_1002_ijgo_15495 crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0044_1786743 crossref_primary_10_1080_01443615_2021_1993801 crossref_primary_10_1002_jum_15899 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogc_2023_05_022 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogc_2023_05_023 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70103-5 10.1053/j.semperi.2007.03.004 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.11.016 10.1515/jpm-2015-0198 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2006.00459.x 10.1055/s-0037-1606186 10.3109/14767058.2015.1004051 10.1002/14651858.CD001451.pub4 10.1002/14651858.CD000166.pub2 10.1136/bmj.h3080 10.1002/uog.6282 10.1002/uog.12560 10.1080/jmf.11.2.108.112 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009 10.1002/uog.14822 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002220 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb03255.x 10.1002/1520-6661(200009/10)9:5<287::AID-MFM6>3.0.CO;2-1 10.1159/000477932 10.3109/14767058.2011.632453 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.04.018 10.1002/uog.7506 10.1002/uog.6378 10.1186/1471-2393-13-236 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70413-2 10.1097/aog.0000000000001815 10.1515/jpm-2012-0042 10.1016/j.placenta.2015.01.200 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.11.983 10.1016/0002-9378(88)90423-1 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61904-8 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000289 10.7863/ultra.33.4.705 10.1097/00006250-200107000-00012 10.1002/uog.17542 10.1002/uog.14842 10.1002/14651858.CD009433.pub2 10.1097/aog.0000000000000388 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015402 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.02.022 10.1002/14651858.CD012245.pub2 10.1016/S0301-2115(02)00140-9 10.1007/s00404-011-1888-8 10.1097/00006254-200106000-00007 10.1586/erp.11.100 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01020-X 10.1007/s00404-018-4978-z 10.1097/00007611-199310000-00010 10.1002/uog.14758 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb03191.x 10.1007/s00192-004-1203-3 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.08.011 10.1111/1471-0528.14466 10.1111/1471-0528.14465 10.1002/uog.17500 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00060.x 10.1136/bmj.323.7305.157 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2002.810909.x 10.1007/s00404-014-3292-7 10.1002/uog.13319 10.1002/14651858.CD000938.pub2 10.1002/uog.15663 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0687 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.016 10.1093/ije/dyn225 10.1136/bmj.305.6856.746 10.1002/14651858.CD004945.pub4 10.29252/ijrm.14.11.705 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.09060403.x 10.1111/1471-0528.12589 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2009.01100.x 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61723-1 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001274 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb09060.x 10.1136/bmj.e2838 10.1080/14767058.2017.1364722 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.451 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70606-3 10.1002/uog.15738 10.1007/978-94-007-7596-1 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90118-X 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.024 10.1001/jama.2011.1798 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283292468 10.1016/j.placenta.2017.02.006 10.1016/0028-2243(93)90246-9 10.1016/j.jval.2012.06.016 10.1002/uog.15884 10.1016/S0301-2115(96)02606-1 10.1111/1471-0528.15827 10.1002/uog.14928 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1997.tb07414.x 10.3310/hta20650 10.1002/jcu.1870140606 10.1111/1471-0528.14782 10.3109/14767058.2014.892068 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31543-5 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.12.043 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002778 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.08.152 10.1038/sj.jp.7200420 10.1111/1471-0528.12897 10.1136/bmj.c7087 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182056766 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30129-9 10.1038/jp.2017.5 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11042.x 10.1097/aog.0000000000001767 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61135-1 10.1111/1471-0528.13148 10.7326/M15-0969 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.07.017 10.1136/bmj.d7400 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.019 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90395-5 10.1080/14767058.2018.1438394 10.1136/bmj.k207 10.1186/1472-6963-1-6 10.1590/S0100-72032010000100002 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00131-2 10.1002/14651858.CD001450.pub4 10.1016/S0002-9378(11)91615-9 10.1111/1471-0528.14557 10.7863/jum.2008.27.1.39 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1975.tb00708.x 10.1016/S0167-6296(98)00039-3 10.1111/1471-0528.15748 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.05.036 10.1002/14651858.CD007529.pub4 10.1002/uog.8930 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00836-3 10.1148/radiology.181.1.1887021 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2003.02417.x 10.7863/jum.1991.10.3.149 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.03.002 10.1159/000009974 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.04.012 10.1002/uog.5183 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000227 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)32283-9 10.1515/JPM.2010.130 10.7863/jum.2011.30.3.303 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70037-2 10.1515/JPM.2008.057 10.1186/1471-2393-8-51 10.1113/JP271099 10.1055/s-0028-1109185 10.1097/01.AOG.0000287615.35425.5c 10.1016/0002-9378(88)90425-5 10.1111/1471-0528.15809 10.1111/1471-0528.15394 10.1503/cmaj.050796 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.013 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32152-9 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.065 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.054 10.7863/jum.2008.27.7.1029 10.1002/uog.3949 10.1007/s13224-013-0467-2 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02840-3 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.11.623 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90298-4 10.1080/14767058.2018.1441281 10.1067/mob.2001.109735 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.016 10.1007/s00404-003-0525-6 10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.004 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9 10.1002/14651858.CD011739.pub2 10.1016/j.placenta.2021.03.011 10.1007/s40273-014-0219-x 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.10.889 10.1097/01.ogx.0000435370.74455.a8 10.1007/s00404-013-2764-5 10.1002/uog.17491 10.1001/jama.1996.03540180036030 10.1177/1362361314536626 10.1016/j.jval.2020.11.005 10.1007/s00404-006-0309-x 10.1002/sim.942 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08360.x |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.3310/hta25150 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| EISSN | 2046-4924 |
| EndPage | 190 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_65e819721b5743b8a9395976ac968386 PMC7958245 33656977 10_3310_hta25150 |
| Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Systematic Review Journal Article |
| GrantInformation | Vol. 25, No. 15. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Medical Research Council grantid: G9533539 – fundername: Department of Health grantid: 15/105/01 – fundername: Department of Health grantid: CS-2013-13-009 |
| GroupedDBID | --- 53G 5GY AAYXX ADBBV ADDVE AENEX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BAWUL BCNDV CITATION CZQ DIK EBS EJD F5P GROUPED_DOAJ OK1 P2P P6G TR2 W2D CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-86139fff61b9d4d358315816f77737d69403fc7e707cdc85d2ed7f9f777c81e13 |
| IEDL.DBID | DOA |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 20 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000625935200001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1366-5278 2046-4924 |
| IngestDate | Fri Oct 03 12:50:37 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:45:19 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 01 14:07:40 EDT 2025 Sat May 31 02:12:17 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 03:04:27 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 21:49:38 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 15 |
| Keywords | FETAL MACROSOMIA PERINATAL DEATH DECISION TREES BIOMETRY BREECH PRESENTATION ULTRASONOGRAPHY FETAL WEIGHT COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS PREGNANCY |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c438t-86139fff61b9d4d358315816f77737d69403fc7e707cdc85d2ed7f9f777c81e13 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-9950-6751 0000-0001-7897-7987 0000-0001-9764-6876 0000-0002-5074-4740 0000-0003-2124-0997 0000-0001-8143-2232 0000-0001-5712-9989 0000-0003-4634-1129 0000-0002-0799-1105 0000-0002-4303-7845 0000-0002-8369-1577 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/65e819721b5743b8a9395976ac968386 |
| PMID | 33656977 |
| PQID | 2497113667 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 190 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_65e819721b5743b8a9395976ac968386 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7958245 proquest_miscellaneous_2497113667 pubmed_primary_33656977 crossref_citationtrail_10_3310_hta25150 crossref_primary_10_3310_hta25150 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2021-02-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-02-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2021 text: 2021-02-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | England |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England |
| PublicationTitle | Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Health Technol Assess |
| PublicationYear | 2021 |
| Publisher | NIHR Journals Library |
| Publisher_xml | – name: NIHR Journals Library |
| References | Cohen (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib111) 2010; 35 Stock (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib160) 2012; 344 Deeks (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib40) 2001; 323 Sijmons (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib50) 1989; 96 Morris (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib81) 2003; 110 Sahin (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib97) 2018; 31 Akolekar (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib57) 2015; 46 Benner (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib204) 2010; 29 Blackwell (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib146) 2009; 200 Culliney (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib203) 2016; 4 Sritippayawan (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib139) 2007; 90 Krebs (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib10) 1996; 175 Giussani (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib56) 2016; 594 Ashwal (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib74) 2014; 290 Hendrix (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib119) 2000; 45 Sovio (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib8) 2015; 386 Gherman (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib207) 1998; 178 Thorpe-Beeston (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib12) 1992; 305 Asgharnia (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib89) 2013; 11 Boulvain (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib151) 2016; 5 MacKenzie (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib168) 2007; 110 Henrichs (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib120) 2003; 48 Ben-Haroush (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib105) 2007; 130 Wickham (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib158) 2019 Sandmire (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib169) 1996; 174 Heath (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib193) 2018; 21 Megha (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib79) 2014; 64 The Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network Writing Group (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib29) 2011; 306 Nahum (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib129) 2007; 133 Melamed (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib125) 2011; 38 Twomey (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib71) 2016; 203 Bligh (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib59) 2018; 52 Rouse (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib157) 1996; 276 O’Reilly-Green (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib131) 1997; 9 Smith (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib19) 2018; 125 Monier (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib22) 2015; 122 Flatley (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib61) 2019; 32 Phelan (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib73) 1987; 32 Galvin (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib116) 2017; 216 Stumpfe (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib70) 2019; 299 Barrett (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib182) 2015; 19 Curtis (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib212) 2016 Gumus (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib92) 2007; 276 Rial-Crestelo (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib68) 2019; 32 Hofmeyr (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib14) 2015; 7 Benson (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib107) 1991; 10 Rainford (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib85) 2001; 46 Kayem (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib122) 2009; 34 Chauhan (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib109) 2006; 195 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib202) 2016; 128 Phillips (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib25) 2017; 7 MacKay (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib172) 2010; 7 Pasupathy (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib36) 2008; 8 Campbell (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib100) 1975; 82 Nelson (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib199) 2016; 164 Freire (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib115) 2010; 32 Lamont (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib26) 2015; 350 Morales-Roselló (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib65) 2014; 43 Heazell (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib23) 2019; 5 Haas (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib30) 2015; 212 Culligan (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib180) 2005; 16 Banks (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib90) 1999; 180 Alfirevic (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib179) 2016; 20 Boulvain (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib101) 2015; 385 Boers (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib99) 2010; 341 Ghosh (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib75) 2002; 81 Jamal (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib93) 2016; 14 Bricker (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib21) 2015; 6 key20210302102310662_ref1-bib183 Ben-Haroush (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib106) 2008; 27 Thorngren-Jerneck (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib170) 2001; 98 key20210302102310662_ref1-bib185 Naveiro-Fuentes (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib83) 2016; 44 key20210302102310662_ref1-bib186 key20210302102310662_ref1-bib188 Pates (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib132) 2008; 27 Hsieh (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib77) 1998; 45 Benacerraf (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib104) 1988; 159 Smith (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib137) 1997; 104 Shepard (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib143) 1982; 142 Quiñones (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib84) 2012; 25 Alfirevic (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib20) 2017; 6 Malloy (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib211) 2000; 20 Leigh (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib187) 2014; 121 Morris (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib33) 2014; 121 Hanretty (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib48) 1989; 96 Wastlund (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib11) 2019; 16 Little (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib145) 2012; 207 Melamed (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib80) 2011; 205 Weiner (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib141) 2002; 105 key20210302102310662_ref1-bib175 Gibson (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib167) 2014; 211 James (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib178) 2001; 1 Valino (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib51) 2016; 47 Chongsuvivatwong (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib166) 2010; 36 Wilson (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib190) 2015; 33 Kiserud (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib7) 2017; 14 Morrison (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib163) 1995; 102 Pratt (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib192) 1995 Prior (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib66) 2013; 208 Kwon (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib94) 2006; 32 Smith (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib15) 2007; 370 Prior (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib67) 2015; 46 Bligh (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib60) 2018; 43 Grobman (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib154) 2018; 379 De Reu (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib114) 2008; 36 Curtis (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib210) 2008 Bond (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib150) 2015; 11 Norman (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib200) 2018; 392 Maged (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib63) 2014; 27 key20210302102310662_ref1-bib152 Deeks (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib41) 2005; 58 Smith (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib18) 2019; 126 Moraitis (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib35) 2021 Choi (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib91) 2016; 29 Myles (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib82) 2002; 47 Fischer (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib46) 1991; 78 Schulman (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib49) 1989; 160 Nahum (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib128) 2003; 48 Weiner (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib142) 2016; 214 Palencia (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib177) 2006; 174 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib4) 2016; 128 Rutherford (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib96) 1987; 70 NHS England (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib153) Walker (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib194) 2017; 124 Valino (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib52) 2016; 47 Gilby (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib117) 2000; 45 Nicod (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib130) 2012; 8 Claxton (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib191) 1999; 18 Heazell (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib196) 2016; 387 Parry (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib147) 2000; 45 Heazell (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib197) 2015; 46 Young (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib215) 2010; 91 Roberts (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib195) 2012; 15 Impey (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib13) 2017; 124 Gordijn (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib148) 2016; 48 Aviram (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib102) 2017; 37 Alfirevic (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib34) 2015; 4 Impey (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib156) 2017; 124 Hadlock (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib5) 1985; 151 Reitsma (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib39) 2005; 58 Levine (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib124) 1992; 79 Strong (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib159) 2015 Hassan (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib76) 2005; 15 Mistry (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib181) 2013; 13 Rossi (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib165) 2013; 68 Wastlund (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib155) 2019; 126 Akolekar (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib42) 2019; 221 key20210302102310662_ref1-bib2 Sabdia (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib69) 2015; 36 Monaghan (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib64) 2018; 52 Miller (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib126) 1986; 14 Sovio (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib138) 2018; 51 Miller (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib127) 1988; 159 Rutter (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib38) 2001; 20 Sapir (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib136) 2017; 216 Moraitis (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib54) 2014; 124 key20210302102310662_ref1-bib88 Hannah (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib206) 2000; 356 Humphries (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib121) 2002; 11 Wilson (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib189) 2021 Ouzounian (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib164) 2005; 192 Locatelli (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib78) 2004; 269 Whiting (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib37) 2011; 155 Flenady (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib55) 2016; 387 Hadlock (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib6) 1991; 181 Pollack (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib134) 1992; 167 Sylvestre (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib140) 2000; 9 Smith (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib32) 2012; 9 Bolz (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib43) 2013; 41 Rossavik (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib135) 1993; 86 Eskes (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib198) 2019; 126 EuroQol Group (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib214) 1990; 16 Revicki (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib31) 2012; 12 Cooley (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib44) 2011; 39 Shanks (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib86) 2011; 30 Brocklehurst (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib28) 2011; 343 Smith (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib17) 2001; 184 Goffinet (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib47) 1997; 71 Cromi (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib113) 2007; 30 Leung (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib161) 1999; 106 Hoffman (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib9) 2009; 21 Crimmins (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib112) 2018; 35 GBD 2016 Causes of Death Collaborators (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib1) 2017; 390 Balsyte (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib103) 2009; 33 Dunn (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib72) 2017; 54 Bakalis (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib58) 2015; 45 key20210302102310662_ref1-bib208 Weiner (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib53) 1993; 48 key20210302102310662_ref1-bib209 Kinzler (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib27) 2007; 31 Filmar (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib45) 2013; 288 Chervenak (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib110) 1989; 161 Ben-Meir (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib162) 2007; 196 Pasupathy (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib171) 2009; 38 Petrozella (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib95) 2011; 117 Curtis (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib184) 2017 Khalil (key20210302102310662_ref1-bib62) 2015; 213 Persson (key2 |
| References_xml | – volume: 175 start-page: 1534 year: 1996 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib10 article-title: Intrauterine growth restriction with absent end-diastolic flow velocity in the umbilical artery is associated with maldevelopment of the placental terminal villous tree publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70103-5 – volume: 31 start-page: 126 year: 2007 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib27 article-title: Fetal growth restriction and subsequent pregnancy risks publication-title: Semin Perinatol doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2007.03.004 – volume-title: Saving Babies’ Lives Version Two: A Care Bundle for Reducing Perinatal Mortality ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib153 – volume: 208 start-page: 124e1 year: 2013 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib66 article-title: Prediction of intrapartum fetal compromise using the cerebroumbilical ratio: a prospective observational study publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.11.016 – volume: 44 start-page: 793 year: 2016 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib83 article-title: Perinatal outcomes with isolated oligohydramnios at term pregnancy publication-title: J Perinat Med doi: 10.1515/jpm-2015-0198 – volume: 32 start-page: 545 year: 2006 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib94 article-title: Abnormal Doppler velocimetry is related to adverse perinatal outcome for borderline amniotic fluid index during third trimester publication-title: J Obstet Gynaecol Res doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2006.00459.x – volume: 35 start-page: 140 year: 2018 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib112 article-title: Polyhydramnios or excessive fetal growth are markers for abnormal perinatal outcome in euglycemic pregnancies publication-title: Am J Perinatol doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1606186 – volume: 29 start-page: 457 year: 2016 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib91 article-title: Borderline amniotic fluid index and perinatal outcomes in the uncomplicated term pregnancy publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1004051 – volume: 6 year: 2015 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib21 article-title: Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks’ gestation) publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001451.pub4 – volume: 7 year: 2015 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib14 article-title: Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000166.pub2 – volume: 350 start-page: h3080 year: 2015 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib26 article-title: Risk of recurrent stillbirth: systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3080 – volume: 33 start-page: 453 year: 2009 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib103 article-title: Sonographic prediction of macrosomia cannot be improved by combination with pregnancy-specific characteristics publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.6282 – volume: 43 start-page: 77 year: 2014 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib108 article-title: Evaluation of fetal anthropometric measures to predict the risk for shoulder dystocia publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.12560 – volume: 11 start-page: 108 year: 2002 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib121 article-title: Sonographic estimate of birth weight: relative accuracy of sonographers versus maternal-fetal medicine specialists publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med doi: 10.1080/jmf.11.2.108.112 – volume: 155 start-page: 529 year: 2011 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib37 article-title: QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies publication-title: Ann Intern Med doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009 – volume: 45 start-page: 409 year: 2015 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib58 article-title: Umbilical and fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler at 30-34 weeks’ gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.14822 – volume: 14 start-page: e1002220 year: 2017 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib7 article-title: The World Health Organization Fetal Growth Charts: a multinational longitudinal study of ultrasound biometric measurements and estimated fetal weight publication-title: PLOS Med doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002220 – volume: 96 start-page: 557 year: 1989 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib50 article-title: The validity of screening for small-for-gestational-age and low-weight-for-length infants by Doppler ultrasound publication-title: Br J Obstet Gynaecol doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb03255.x – volume: 9 start-page: 287 year: 2000 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib140 article-title: Diagnosis of macrosomia in the postdates population: combining sonographic estimates of fetal weight with glucose challenge testing publication-title: J Matern Fetal Med doi: 10.1002/1520-6661(200009/10)9:5<287::AID-MFM6>3.0.CO;2-1 – volume: 43 start-page: 191 year: 2018 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib60 article-title: Diagnostic performance of cerebroplacental ratio thresholds at term for prediction of low birthweight and adverse intrapartum and neonatal outcomes in a term, low-risk population publication-title: Fetal Diagn Ther doi: 10.1159/000477932 – volume: 25 start-page: 1319 year: 2012 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib84 article-title: Determining a threshold for amniotic fluid as a predictor of perinatal outcome at term publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.632453 – volume: 130 start-page: 187 year: 2007 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib105 article-title: Predictive value of a single early fetal weight estimate in normal pregnancies publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.04.018 – volume: 35 start-page: 434 year: 2010 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib111 article-title: Influence of ultrasound-to-delivery interval and maternal–fetal characteristics on validity of estimated fetal weight publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.7506 – volume: 34 start-page: 566 year: 2009 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib122 article-title: Comparison of fundal height measurement and sonographically measured fetal abdominal circumference in the prediction of high and low birth weight at term publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.6378 – volume: 90 start-page: 1058 year: 2007 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib139 article-title: The accuracy of gestation-adjusted projection method in estimating birth weight by sonographic fetal measurements in the third trimester publication-title: J Med Assoc Thai – volume: 13 start-page: 236 year: 2013 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib181 article-title: A structured review and exploration of the healthcare costs associated with stillbirth and a subsequent pregnancy in England and Wales publication-title: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-236 – volume: 178 start-page: 423 year: 1998 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib207 article-title: Spontaneous vaginal delivery: a risk factor for Erb’s palsy? publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecology doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70413-2 – volume: 128 start-page: e241 year: 2016 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib4 article-title: Practice Bulletin No. 175: Ultrasound in Pregnancy publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/aog.0000000000001815 – volume: 41 start-page: 165 year: 2013 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib43 article-title: Value of Doppler sonography near term: can umbilical and uterine artery indices in low-risk pregnancies predict perinatal outcome? publication-title: J Perinat Med doi: 10.1515/jpm-2012-0042 – volume: 36 start-page: 594 year: 2015 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib69 article-title: Predicting intrapartum fetal compromise using the fetal cerebro-umbilical ratio publication-title: Placenta doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2015.01.200 – volume: 216 start-page: S68 year: 2017 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib116 article-title: 94: Accuracy of prenatal detection of macrosomia > 4,000g and outcomes in the absence of intervention: results of the prospective multicenter genesis study publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.11.983 – volume: 159 start-page: 1110 year: 1988 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib127 article-title: Ultrasonographic identification of the macrosomic fetus publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(88)90423-1 – volume: 385 start-page: 2600 year: 2015 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib101 article-title: Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61904-8 – volume: 7 start-page: e1000289 year: 2010 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib172 article-title: Gestational age at delivery and special educational need: retrospective cohort study of 407,503 schoolchildren publication-title: PLOS Med doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000289 – volume: 33 start-page: 705 year: 2014 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib98 article-title: Borderline amniotic fluid index and its relation to fetal intolerance of labor: a 2-center retrospective cohort study publication-title: J Ultrasound Med doi: 10.7863/ultra.33.4.705 – volume: 98 start-page: 65 year: 2001 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib170 article-title: Low 5-minute Apgar score: a population-based register study of 1 million term births publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/00006250-200107000-00012 – volume: 52 start-page: 340 year: 2018 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib59 article-title: Cerebroplacental ratio thresholds measured within 2-weeks before birth and risk of Cesarean section for intrapartum fetal compromise and adverse neonatal outcome publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.17542 – volume: 46 start-page: 82 year: 2015 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib57 article-title: Umbilical and fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler at 35–37 weeks’ gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.14842 – volume: 11 year: 2015 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib150 article-title: Planned early delivery versus expectant management of the term suspected compromised baby for improving outcomes publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009433.pub2 – volume: 124 start-page: 274 year: 2014 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib54 article-title: Birth weight percentile and the risk of term perinatal death publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/aog.0000000000000388 – volume: 7 start-page: e015402 year: 2017 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib25 article-title: Risk of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: BMJ Open doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015402 – volume: 58 start-page: 982 year: 2005 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib39 article-title: Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.02.022 – ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib201 – volume: 5 year: 2019 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib23 article-title: Biochemical tests of placental function versus ultrasound assessment of fetal size for stillbirth and small-for-gestational-age infants publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012245.pub2 – volume: 105 start-page: 20 year: 2002 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib141 article-title: Clinical and ultrasonographic weight estimation in large for gestational age fetus publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol doi: 10.1016/S0301-2115(02)00140-9 – volume: 284 start-page: 1345 year: 2011 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib123 article-title: Role of fetal abdominal circumference as a prognostic parameter of perinatal complications publication-title: Arch Gynecol Obstet doi: 10.1007/s00404-011-1888-8 – volume: 45 start-page: 936 year: 2000 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib117 article-title: Fetal abdominal circumference measurements of 35 and 38 cm as predictors of macrosomia. A risk factor for shoulder dystocia publication-title: J Reprod Med doi: 10.1097/00006254-200106000-00007 – volume: 12 start-page: 105 year: 2012 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib31 article-title: Methods and issues associated with the use of quality-adjusted life-years publication-title: Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res doi: 10.1586/erp.11.100 – volume: 387 start-page: 691 year: 2016 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib55 article-title: Stillbirths: recall to action in high-income countries publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01020-X – volume: 299 start-page: 411 year: 2019 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib70 article-title: Correlation of short-term variation and Doppler parameters with adverse perinatal outcome in low-risk fetuses at term publication-title: Arch Gynecol Obstet doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4978-z – volume: 48 start-page: 339 year: 2003 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib120 article-title: Detecting fetal macrosomia with abdominal circumference alone publication-title: J Reprod Med – volume: 86 start-page: 1129 year: 1993 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib135 article-title: Macrosomatia and ultrasonography: what is the problem? publication-title: South Med J doi: 10.1097/00007611-199310000-00010 – volume: 46 start-page: 460 year: 2015 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib67 article-title: Are fetuses that fail to achieve their growth potential at increased risk of intrapartum compromise? publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.14758 – volume: 96 start-page: 1163 year: 1989 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib48 article-title: Pregnancy screening by Doppler uteroplacental and umbilical artery waveforms publication-title: Br J Obstet Gynaecol doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb03191.x – volume: 16 start-page: 19 year: 2005 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib180 article-title: Elective cesarean section to prevent anal incontinence and brachial plexus injuries associated with macrosomia – a decision analysis publication-title: Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct doi: 10.1007/s00192-004-1203-3 – volume: 133 start-page: 148 year: 2007 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib129 article-title: A computerized method for accurately predicting fetal macrosomia up to 11 weeks before delivery publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.08.011 – volume: 124 start-page: e178 year: 2017 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib13 article-title: on behalf of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. External cephalic version and reducing the incidence of term breech presentation publication-title: BJOG doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14466 – volume: 48 start-page: 13 year: 2003 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib128 article-title: Ultrasonic prediction of term birth weight in Hispanic women. Accuracy in an outpatient clinic publication-title: J Reprod Med – volume: 124 start-page: e151 year: 2017 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib156 article-title: on behalf of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Management of breech presentation publication-title: BJOG doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14465 – volume: 11 start-page: 705 year: 2013 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib89 article-title: Perinatal outcomes of pregnancies with borderline versus normal amniotic fluid index publication-title: Iran J Reprod Med – volume: 52 start-page: 72 year: 2018 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib64 article-title: Perinatal loss at term: the role of uteroplacental and fetal doppler assessment publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.17500 – volume: 111 start-page: 220 year: 2004 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib87 article-title: Isolated oligohydramnios is not associated with adverse perinatal outcomes publication-title: BJOG doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00060.x – volume-title: Introduction to Statistical Decision Theory year: 1995 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib192 – volume: 323 start-page: 157 year: 2001 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib40 article-title: Systematic reviews in health care: systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7305.157 – volume: 81 start-page: 852 year: 2002 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib75 article-title: Amniotic fluid index in low-risk pregnancy as an admission test to the labor ward publication-title: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2002.810909.x – volume: 290 start-page: 875 year: 2014 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib74 article-title: The association between isolated oligohydramnios at term and pregnancy outcome publication-title: Arch Gynecol Obstet doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3292-7 – volume: 43 start-page: 303 year: 2014 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib65 article-title: Changes in fetal Doppler indices as a marker of failure to reach growth potential at term publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.13319 – volume: 5 year: 2016 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib151 article-title: Induction of labour at or near term for suspected fetal macrosomia publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000938.pub2 – volume-title: Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2017 year: 2017 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib184 – volume: 47 start-page: 203 year: 2016 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib52 article-title: Biophysical and biochemical markers at 35–37 weeks’ gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.15663 – volume: 29 start-page: 1768 year: 2010 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib204 article-title: An evaluation of recent federal spending on comparative effectiveness research: priorities, gaps, and next steps publication-title: Health Aff doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0687 – volume: 211 start-page: 249e1 year: 2014 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib167 article-title: Maternal and neonatal outcomes in electively induced low-risk term pregnancies publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.016 – volume: 38 start-page: 490 year: 2009 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib171 article-title: Time trend in the risk of delivery-related perinatal and neonatal death associated with breech presentation at term publication-title: Int J Epidemiol doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn225 – volume: 15 start-page: 85 year: 2005 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib76 article-title: The role of amniotic fluid index in the management of postdate pregnancy publication-title: J Coll Physicians Surg Pak – volume: 305 start-page: 746 year: 1992 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib12 article-title: Outcome of breech delivery at term publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6856.746 – volume: 5 year: 2018 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib16 article-title: Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004945.pub4 – volume: 14 start-page: 705 year: 2016 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib93 article-title: Adverse perinatal outcomes in borderline amniotic fluid index publication-title: Int J Reprod Biomed doi: 10.29252/ijrm.14.11.705 – volume: 9 start-page: 403 year: 1997 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib131 article-title: Receiver operating characteristic curves of sonographic estimated fetal weight for prediction of macrosomia in prolonged pregnancies publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.09060403.x – volume: 121 start-page: 686 year: 2014 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib33 article-title: Association and prediction of amniotic fluid measurements for adverse pregnancy outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: BJOG doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12589 – volume: 36 start-page: 45 year: 2010 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib166 article-title: Maternal and fetal mortality and complications associated with cesarean section deliveries in teaching hospitals in Asia publication-title: J Obstet Gynaecol Res doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2009.01100.x – ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib205 – volume: 370 start-page: 1715 year: 2007 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib15 article-title: Stillbirth publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61723-1 – volume: 9 start-page: e1001274 year: 2012 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib32 article-title: Researching new methods of screening for adverse pregnancy outcome: lessons from pre-eclampsia publication-title: PLOS Med doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001274 – volume: 102 start-page: 101 year: 1995 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib163 article-title: Neonatal respiratory morbidity and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean section publication-title: Br J Obstet Gynaecol doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb09060.x – volume: 344 start-page: e2838 year: 2012 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib160 article-title: Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2838 – volume: 8 start-page: 20222026 year: 2012 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib130 article-title: Performance of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in fetuses weighing ≤ 2000 g and more than 4000 g publication-title: Rev Med Suisse – volume: 31 start-page: 3085 year: 2018 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib97 article-title: Perinatal outcomes in uncomplicated late preterm pregnancies with borderline oligohydramnios publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1364722 – volume: 214 start-page: S225 year: 2016 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib142 article-title: 410: Comparison between three methods for the detection of macrosomia and growth restriction in patients presenting in active labor--a prospective study publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.451 – volume: 174 start-page: 1557 year: 1996 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib169 article-title: The Green Bay cesarean section study. IV. The physician factor as a determinant of cesarean birth rates for the large fetus publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70606-3 – volume: 46 start-page: 641 year: 2015 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib197 article-title: Research priorities for stillbirth: process overview and results from UK Stillbirth Priority Setting Partnership publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.15738 – ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib185 doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-7596-1 – volume: 379 start-page: 513 year: 2018 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib154 article-title: Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566 – volume: 45 start-page: 317 year: 2000 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib119 article-title: Clinical vs. sonographic estimate of birth weight in term parturients. A randomized clinical trial publication-title: J Reprod Med – volume: 45 start-page: 17 year: 2000 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib147 article-title: Ultrasonographic prediction of fetal macrosomia. Association with cesarean delivery publication-title: J Reprod Med – volume: 160 start-page: 192 year: 1989 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib49 article-title: Pregnancy surveillance with Doppler velocimetry of uterine and umbilical arteries publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90118-X – volume: 213 start-page: 54.e1 year: 2015 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib62 article-title: Is fetal cerebroplacental ratio an independent predictor of intrapartum fetal compromise and neonatal unit admission? publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.024 – volume: 306 start-page: 2469 year: 2011 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib29 article-title: Association between stillbirth and risk factors known at pregnancy confirmation publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1798 – volume: 21 start-page: 161 year: 2009 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib9 article-title: Assessing the ‘at-risk’ fetus: Doppler ultrasound publication-title: Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283292468 – ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib152 – volume: 54 start-page: 68 year: 2017 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib72 article-title: Review: Systematic review of the utility of the fetal cerebroplacental ratio measured at term for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome publication-title: Placenta doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2017.02.006 – ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib175 – volume: 48 start-page: 93 year: 1993 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib53 article-title: The value of Doppler ultrasonography in prolonged pregnancies publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(93)90246-9 – volume: 15 start-page: 804 year: 2012 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib195 article-title: Conceptualizing a model: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force – 2 publication-title: Value Health doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.06.016 – volume: 48 start-page: 333 year: 2016 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib148 article-title: Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.15884 – volume: 71 start-page: 11 year: 1997 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib47 article-title: Predictive value of Doppler umbilical artery velocimetry in a low risk population with normal fetal biometry. A prospective study of 2016 women publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol doi: 10.1016/S0301-2115(96)02606-1 – volume: 126 start-page: 1258 year: 2019 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib18 article-title: The risk of perinatal death at term publication-title: BJOG doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15827 – volume: 47 start-page: 194 year: 2016 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib51 article-title: Biophysical and biochemical markers at 30–34 weeks’ gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.14928 – volume: 39 start-page: 214 year: 1997 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib213 article-title: Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy publication-title: Dev Med Child Neurol doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1997.tb07414.x – volume: 20 issue: 65 year: 2016 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib179 article-title: Which method is best for the induction of labour? A systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis publication-title: Health Technol Assess doi: 10.3310/hta20650 – volume: 14 start-page: 437 year: 1986 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib126 article-title: Fetal weight estimates in late pregnancy with emphasis on macrosomia publication-title: J Clin Ultrasound doi: 10.1002/jcu.1870140606 – volume: 125 start-page: 101 year: 2018 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib19 article-title: Should we implement universal screening with late pregnancy ultrasound to prevent stillbirth? publication-title: BJOG doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14782 – volume: 27 start-page: 1880 year: 2014 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib63 article-title: Fetal middle cerebral and umbilical artery Doppler after 40 weeks gestational age publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.892068 – volume: 392 start-page: 1629 year: 2018 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib200 article-title: Awareness of fetal movements and care package to reduce fetal mortality (AFFIRM): a stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31543-5 – volume: 200 start-page: 340e1 year: 2009 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib146 article-title: Overestimation of fetal weight by ultrasound: does it influence the likelihood of cesarean delivery for labor arrest? publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.12.043 – volume: 16 start-page: e1002778 year: 2019 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib11 article-title: Screening for breech presentation using universal late-pregnancy ultrasonography: a prospective cohort study and cost effectiveness analysis publication-title: PLOS Med doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002778 – volume: 91 start-page: 143 year: 2010 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib215 article-title: The health and quality of life outcomes among youth and young adults with cerebral palsy publication-title: Arch Phys Med Rehabil doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.08.152 – volume: 20 start-page: 414 year: 2000 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib211 article-title: Respiratory distress syndrome mortality in the United States, 1987 to 1995 publication-title: J Perinatol doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7200420 – volume: 121 start-page: 1720 year: 2014 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib187 article-title: The incidence and implications of cerebral palsy following potentially avoidable obstetric complications: a preliminary burden of disease study publication-title: BJOG doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12897 – volume: 341 start-page: c7087 year: 2010 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib99 article-title: Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT) publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.c7087 – volume: 117 start-page: 338 year: 2011 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib95 article-title: Clinical significance of borderline amniotic fluid index and oligohydramnios in preterm pregnancy publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182056766 – volume: 2 start-page: 569 year: 2018 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib149 article-title: Screening for fetal growth restriction using ultrasound and the sFLT1/PlGF ratio in nulliparous women: a prospective cohort study publication-title: Lancet Child Adolesc Health doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30129-9 – volume: 37 start-page: 513 year: 2017 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib102 article-title: Prediction of large for gestational age by various sonographic fetal weight estimation formulas-which should we use? publication-title: J Perinatol doi: 10.1038/jp.2017.5 – volume: 104 start-page: 186 year: 1997 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib137 article-title: The relation between fetal abdominal circumference and birthweight: findings in 3512 pregnancies publication-title: Br J Obstet Gynaecol doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11042.x – volume: 128 start-page: e195 year: 2016 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib202 article-title: Practice bulletin no. 173: fetal macrosomia publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/aog.0000000000001767 – ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib2 – volume: 384 start-page: 1749 year: 2014 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib174 article-title: Apgar score and the risk of cause-specific infant mortality: a population-based cohort study publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61135-1 – volume-title: Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2008 year: 2008 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib210 – ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib209 – volume: 122 start-page: 518 year: 2015 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib22 article-title: Poor effectiveness of antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction and consequences for obstetric management and neonatal outcomes: a French national study publication-title: BJOG doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13148 – volume: 164 start-page: 244 year: 2016 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib199 article-title: Effectiveness of breast cancer screening: systematic review and meta-analysis to update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation publication-title: Ann Intern Med doi: 10.7326/M15-0969 – ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib186 – volume: 170 start-page: 358 year: 2013 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib176 article-title: Economic analysis comparing induction of labour and expectant management for intrauterine growth restriction at term (DIGITAT trial) publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.07.017 – volume: 343 start-page: d7400 year: 2011 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib28 article-title: Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.d7400 – volume: 212 start-page: 539e1 year: 2015 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib30 article-title: A description of the methods of the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: monitoring mothers-to-be (nuMoM2b) publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.019 – volume: 161 start-page: 753 year: 1989 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib110 article-title: Macrosomia in the postdate pregnancy: is routine ultrasonographic screening indicated? publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90395-5 – volume: 32 start-page: 2380 year: 2019 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib61 article-title: Is the fetal cerebroplacental ratio better that the estimated fetal weight in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in a low risk cohort? publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1438394 – volume: 360 start-page: k207 year: 2018 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib173 article-title: Five and 10 minute Apgar scores and risks of cerebral palsy and epilepsy: population based cohort study in Sweden publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.k207 – volume: 1 start-page: 6 year: 2001 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib178 article-title: A decision analytical cost analysis of offering ECV in a UK district general hospital publication-title: BMC Health Serv Res doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-1-6 – volume: 78 start-page: 363 year: 1991 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib46 article-title: Doppler evaluation of umbilical and uterine-arcuate arteries in the postdates pregnancy publication-title: Obstet Gynecol – volume: 32 start-page: 4 year: 2010 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib115 article-title: Correlation between estimated fetal weight by ultrasound and neonatal weight publication-title: Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet doi: 10.1590/S0100-72032010000100002 – volume: 386 start-page: 2089 year: 2015 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib8 article-title: Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00131-2 – volume: 4 year: 2015 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib34 article-title: Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in normal pregnancy publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001450.pub4 – volume: 167 start-page: 7 year: 1992 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib134 article-title: Macrosomia in postdates pregnancies: the accuracy of routine ultrasonographic screening publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(11)91615-9 – volume: 124 start-page: 929 year: 2017 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib194 article-title: Labour induction near term for women aged 35 or over: an economic evaluation publication-title: BJOG doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14557 – volume: 27 start-page: 39 year: 2008 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib132 article-title: Predicting macrosomia publication-title: J Ultrasound Med doi: 10.7863/jum.2008.27.1.39 – volume: 82 start-page: 689 year: 1975 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib100 article-title: Ultrasonic measurement of fetal abdomen circumference in the estimation of fetal weight publication-title: Br J Obstet Gynaecol doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1975.tb00708.x – volume: 18 start-page: 341 year: 1999 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib191 article-title: The irrelevance of inference: a decision-making approach to the stochastic evaluation of health care technologies publication-title: J Health Econ doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(98)00039-3 – volume: 126 start-page: 1252 year: 2019 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib198 article-title: The risk of intrapartum/neonatal mortality and morbidity following birth at 37 weeks of gestation: a nationwide cohort study publication-title: BJOG doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15748 – volume: 203 start-page: 89 year: 2016 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib71 article-title: The association between a low cerebro-umbilical ratio at 30-34 weeks gestation, increased intrapartum operative intervention and adverse perinatal outcomes publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.05.036 – volume-title: SAVI: SAVI Sheffield Accelerated Value of Information year: 2015 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib159 – volume: 6 year: 2017 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib20 article-title: Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007529.pub4 – volume: 38 start-page: 74 year: 2011 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib125 article-title: Prediction of fetal macrosomia: effect of sonographic fetal weight-estimation model and threshold used publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.8930 – volume: 387 start-page: 604 year: 2016 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib196 article-title: Stillbirths: economic and psychosocial consequences publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00836-3 – volume: 181 start-page: 129 year: 1991 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib6 article-title: In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard publication-title: Radiology doi: 10.1148/radiology.181.1.1887021 – volume: 110 start-page: 989 year: 2003 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib81 article-title: The usefulness of ultrasound assessment of amniotic fluid in predicting adverse outcome in prolonged pregnancy: a prospective blinded observational study publication-title: BJOG doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2003.02417.x – volume: 10 start-page: 149 year: 1991 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib107 article-title: Amniotic fluid volume in large-for-gestational-age fetuses of nondiabetic mothers publication-title: J Ultrasound Med doi: 10.7863/jum.1991.10.3.149 – volume: 221 start-page: 65e1 year: 2019 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib42 article-title: Routine assessment of cerebroplacental ratio at 35-37 weeks’ gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.03.002 – ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib188 – volume: 45 start-page: 232 year: 1998 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib77 article-title: Perinatal outcome of oligohydramnios without associated premature rupture of membranes and fetal anomalies publication-title: Gynecol Obstet Invest doi: 10.1159/000009974 – volume: 195 start-page: 601 year: 2006 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib109 article-title: Sonographic estimate of birth weight among high-risk patients: feasibility and factors influencing accuracy publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.04.012 – volume: 70 start-page: 353 year: 1987 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib96 article-title: The four-quadrant assessment of amniotic fluid volume: an adjunct to antepartum fetal heart rate testing publication-title: Obstet Gynecol – volume: 30 start-page: 861 year: 2007 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib113 article-title: Large cross-sectional area of the umbilical cord as a predictor of fetal macrosomia publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.5183 – volume: 59 start-page: 791 year: 2016 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib144 article-title: Shoulder dystocia: incidence and risk factors publication-title: Clin Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000227 – volume: 142 start-page: 47 year: 1982 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib143 article-title: An evaluation of two equations for predicting fetal weight by ultrasound publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)32283-9 – volume: 39 start-page: 143 year: 2011 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib44 article-title: The impact of umbilical and uterine artery Doppler indices on antenatal course, labor and delivery in a low-risk primigravid population publication-title: J Perinat Med doi: 10.1515/JPM.2010.130 – volume: 30 start-page: 303 year: 2011 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib86 article-title: Assessing the optimal definition of oligohydramnios associated with adverse neonatal outcomes publication-title: J Ultrasound Med doi: 10.7863/jum.2011.30.3.303 – volume: 180 start-page: 1461 year: 1999 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib90 article-title: Perinatal risks associated with borderline amniotic fluid index publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70037-2 – volume: 36 start-page: 324 year: 2008 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib114 article-title: Value of a single early third trimester fetal biometry for the prediction of birth weight deviations in a low risk population publication-title: J Perinat Med doi: 10.1515/JPM.2008.057 – ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib88 – volume: 8 start-page: 51 year: 2008 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib36 article-title: Study protocol. A prospective cohort study of unselected primiparous women: the pregnancy outcome prediction study publication-title: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-8-51 – volume: 594 start-page: 1215 year: 2016 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib56 article-title: The fetal brain sparing response to hypoxia: physiological mechanisms publication-title: J Physiol doi: 10.1113/JP271099 – volume: 30 start-page: 585 year: 2009 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib118 article-title: Fetal weight estimation by 2D and 3D ultrasound: comparison of six formulas publication-title: Ultraschall Med doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1109185 – volume: 110 start-page: 1059 year: 2007 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib168 article-title: Management of shoulder dystocia: trends in incidence and maternal and neonatal morbidity publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000287615.35425.5c – volume: 46 start-page: 589 year: 2001 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib85 article-title: Amniotic fluid index in the uncomplicated term pregnancy. Prediction of outcome publication-title: J Reprod Med – volume: 159 start-page: 1118 year: 1988 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib104 article-title: Sonographically estimated fetal weights: accuracy and limitation publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(88)90425-5 – volume: 126 start-page: 1243 year: 2019 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib155 article-title: The cost-effectiveness of universal late-pregnancy screening for macrosomia in nulliparous women: a decision analysis publication-title: BJOG doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15809 – volume: 125 start-page: 1642 year: 2018 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib24 article-title: Recurrence of pre-eclampsia and the risk of future hypertension and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: BJOG doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15394 – volume: 174 start-page: 1109 year: 2006 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib177 article-title: The costs of planned cesarean versus planned vaginal birth in the Term Breech Trial publication-title: CMAJ doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050796 – volume: 205 start-page: 241e1 year: 2011 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib80 article-title: Perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated by isolated oligohydramnios diagnosed before 37 weeks of gestation publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.013 – volume: 390 start-page: 1151 year: 2017 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib1 article-title: Global, regional, and national age-sex specific mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32152-9 – ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib183 – volume: 79 start-page: 55 year: 1992 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib124 article-title: Sonographic diagnosis of the large for gestational age fetus at term: does it make a difference? publication-title: Obstet Gynecol – volume: 207 start-page: 309e1 year: 2012 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib145 article-title: Estimated fetal weight by ultrasound: a modifiable risk factor for cesarean delivery? publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.065 – volume: 192 start-page: 19335 year: 2005 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib164 article-title: Shoulder dystocia: are historic risk factors reliable predictors? publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.054 – volume: 27 start-page: 1029 year: 2008 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib106 article-title: Use of the amniotic fluid index combined with estimated fetal weight within 10 days of delivery for prediction of macrosomia at birth publication-title: J Ultrasound Med doi: 10.7863/jum.2008.27.7.1029 – volume: 29 start-page: 304 year: 2007 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib133 article-title: Clinical and ultrasound estimation of birth weight prior to induction of labor at term publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.3949 – volume: 64 start-page: 32 year: 2014 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib79 article-title: Correlation of amniotic fluid index with perinatal outcome publication-title: J Obstet Gynecol India doi: 10.1007/s13224-013-0467-2 – volume: 356 start-page: 1375 year: 2000 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib206 article-title: Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02840-3 – volume: 216 start-page: S221 year: 2017 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib136 article-title: 365: Ultrasound predication of shoulder dystocia in low risk term singleton deliveries publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.11.623 – volume: 47 start-page: 621 year: 2002 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib82 article-title: Normal ultrasonic evaluation of amniotic fluid in low-risk patients at term publication-title: J Reprod Med – volume: 151 start-page: 333 year: 1985 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib5 article-title: Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements – a prospective study publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90298-4 – volume: 32 start-page: 2554 year: 2019 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib68 article-title: Added value of cerebro-placental ratio and uterine artery Doppler at routine third trimester screening as a predictor of SGA and FGR in non-selected pregnancies publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1441281 – volume: 184 start-page: 489 year: 2001 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib17 article-title: Life-table analysis of the risk of perinatal death at term and post term in singleton pregnancies publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.109735 – volume: 58 start-page: 882 year: 2005 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib41 article-title: The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.016 – volume: 269 start-page: 130 year: 2004 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib78 article-title: Perinatal outcome associated with oligohydramnios in uncomplicated term pregnancies publication-title: Arch Gynecol Obstet doi: 10.1007/s00404-003-0525-6 – volume-title: tidyr: Easily Tidy Data with ‘spread()’ and ‘gather()’ Functions year: 2019 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib158 – volume: 21 start-page: 1299 year: 2018 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib193 article-title: Calculating the expected value of sample information using efficient nested Monte Carlo: a tutorial publication-title: Value Health doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.004 – volume: 16 start-page: 199 year: 1990 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib214 article-title: EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life publication-title: Health Policy doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9 – volume: 4 year: 2016 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib203 article-title: Regimens of fetal surveillance of suspected large-for-gestational-age fetuses for improving health outcomes publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011739.pub2 – year: 2021 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib35 article-title: The fetal umbilical artery Doppler as a tool for universal third trimester screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy publication-title: Placenta doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2021.03.011 – volume: 32 start-page: 601 year: 1987 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib73 article-title: Amniotic fluid index measurements during pregnancy publication-title: J Reprod Med – volume: 33 start-page: 105 year: 2015 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib190 article-title: A practical guide to value-of-information analysis publication-title: PharmacoEconomics doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0219-x – ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib208 – volume-title: Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2016 year: 2016 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib212 – volume: 196 start-page: 157e1 year: 2007 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib162 article-title: The incidence of spontaneous version after failed external cephalic version publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.10.889 – volume: 68 start-page: 702 year: 2013 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib165 article-title: Prevention, management, and outcomes of macrosomia: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis publication-title: Obstet Gynecol Surv doi: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000435370.74455.a8 – volume: 288 start-page: 279 year: 2013 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib45 article-title: Elevated umbilical artery systolic/diastolic ratio in the absence of fetal growth restriction publication-title: Arch Gynecol Obstet doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2764-5 – volume: 51 start-page: 783 year: 2018 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib138 article-title: Universal vs selective ultrasonography to screen for large-for-gestational-age infants and associated morbidity publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.17491 – volume: 276 start-page: 1480 year: 1996 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib157 article-title: The effectiveness and costs of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.1996.03540180036030 – volume: 19 start-page: 562 year: 2015 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib182 article-title: Comparing service use and costs among adolescents with autism spectrum disorders, special needs and typical development publication-title: Autism doi: 10.1177/1362361314536626 – volume-title: NHS Fetal Anomaly Screening Programme (FASP) ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib3 – year: 2021 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib189 article-title: Late pregnancy ultrasound to screen for and manage potential birth complications in nulliparous women: a cost-effectiveness and value of information analysis publication-title: Value Health doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.11.005 – volume: 276 start-page: 17 year: 2007 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib92 article-title: Perinatal outcomes of pregnancies with borderline amniotic fluid index publication-title: Arch Gynecol Obstet doi: 10.1007/s00404-006-0309-x – volume: 20 start-page: 2865 year: 2001 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib38 article-title: A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations publication-title: Stat Med doi: 10.1002/sim.942 – volume: 106 start-page: 638 year: 1999 ident: key20210302102310662_ref1-bib161 article-title: Undiagnosed breech revisited publication-title: Br J Obstet Gynaecol doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08360.x |
| SSID | ssj0041651 |
| Score | 2.4170187 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | Currently, pregnant women are screened using ultrasound to perform gestational aging, typically at around 12 weeks' gestation, and around the middle of... Ultrasound scans allow doctors to check on the health of an unborn infant. Usually, all pregnant women receive a scan at about 3 months and about 5 months of... Background: Currently, pregnant women are screened using ultrasound to perform gestational aging, typically at around 12 weeks’ gestation, and around the... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
| StartPage | 1 |
| SubjectTerms | biometry breech presentation Cost-Benefit Analysis decision trees Female fetal macrosomia fetal weight Gestational Age Humans Infant, Newborn Mass Screening Parity perinatal death Pregnancy Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Ultrasonography |
| Title | Universal late pregnancy ultrasound screening to predict adverse outcomes in nulliparous women: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33656977 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2497113667 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7958245 https://doaj.org/article/65e819721b5743b8a9395976ac968386 |
| Volume | 25 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000625935200001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 2046-4924 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0041651 issn: 1366-5278 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20010101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3di9QwEA96iPhynN_r6RFB8Klc23xM4puKhy8ePijsW0nTxFtY2mXbFe7vuH_4ZpruuisHvviamaYhmWR-Qya_YewdomSNsiIrHZQZ4luVWfA6i7GUtfEQg3RjsQm4vDTzuf2-V-qLcsISPXCauHOtgqHSWEWt0NnVxllhEQRr5602woxk24h6tsFUOoMRZajpxZXGUAtMop0ViGXOrwaHPp3e2e85opGv_y6Q-Xeu5J7zuThhxxNq5B_TaB-ze6F9wh5-m-7Fn7KbKb8CdZYIHvlqHX4Rk8Y13yyxv55qJ3E8IDBoRVfFh4408OOBOyrI3AfebQa0vdDzRctbuiBauXW36fnI0PCBO_6H8pmn5y7cYZ--64cs5YRMxyY2J5qTZ-znxZcfn79mU7mFzEthhsygZ7cxRl3UtpGNUEYUyhQ6AoCARluZi-ghQA6-8UY1ZWggWhJ7U4RCPGdHbdeGl4zntdMy5iE3Mkra85aI83PhGoR7iLJm7P127is_cZFTSYxlhTEJrVK1XaUZe7vTXCX-jTt0PtHy7eTEmD02oB1Vkx1V_7Ij_NF28SvcYXRt4tqAE11hgApU-UbDjL1IxrD7lRCIhxFCzxgcmMnBWA4l7eJqZPEGq0wp1av_MfhT9qikXJsxm_w1OxrWm_CGPfC_h0W_PmP3YW7Oxg1yC2XuFW0 |
| linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Universal+late+pregnancy+ultrasound+screening+to+predict+adverse+outcomes+in+nulliparous+women%3A+a+systematic+review+and+cost-effectiveness+analysis&rft.jtitle=Health+technology+assessment+%28Winchester%2C+England%29&rft.au=Smith%2C+Gordon+CS&rft.au=Moraitis%2C+Alexandros+A&rft.au=Wastlund%2C+David&rft.au=Thornton%2C+Jim+G&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.issn=1366-5278&rft.eissn=2046-4924&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=190&rft_id=info:doi/10.3310%2Fhta25150&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_3310_hta25150 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1366-5278&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1366-5278&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1366-5278&client=summon |