An extension of the mixed‐effects growth model that considers between‐person differences in the within‐subject variance and the autocorrelation
Experience sampling methods have led to a significant increase in the availability of intensive longitudinal data. Typically, this type of data is analyzed with a mixed‐effects model that allows to examine hypotheses concerning between‐person differences in the mean structure by including multiple r...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Statistics in medicine Vol. 41; no. 3; pp. 471 - 482 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
England
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
10.02.2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 0277-6715, 1097-0258, 1097-0258 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Experience sampling methods have led to a significant increase in the availability of intensive longitudinal data. Typically, this type of data is analyzed with a mixed‐effects model that allows to examine hypotheses concerning between‐person differences in the mean structure by including multiple random effects per individual (eg, random intercept and random slopes). Here, we describe an extension of this model that—in addition to the random effects for the mean structure—also includes a random effect for the within‐subject variance and a random effect for the autocorrelation. After the description of the model, we show how its parameters can be efficiently estimated using a marginal maximum likelihood (ML) approach. We then illustrate the model using a real data example. We also present the results of a small simulation study in which we compare the ML approach with a Bayesian estimation approach. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| ISSN: | 0277-6715 1097-0258 1097-0258 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/sim.9280 |