Good virtual fences make good neighbors: opportunities for conservation

Fences can both enhance and detract from the conservation of wildlife, and many detrimental impacts are associated with creating physical barriers. By contrast, virtual fences can restrict, control or minimize animal movement without the creation of physical barriers, and present key benefits over t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Animal conservation Jg. 17; H. 3; S. 187 - 196
Hauptverfasser:	Jachowski, D. S., Slotow, R., Millspaugh, J. J.
Format:	Journal Article
Sprache:	Englisch
Veröffentlicht:	London Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.06.2014 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Schlagworte:	Barriers biological fencing birds Fences monitoring proximity-based sensors radio-activated guards real-time sensory deterrent virtual management wildlife Wildlife conservation wildlife management
ISSN:	1367-9430, 1469-1795
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Abstract	Fences can both enhance and detract from the conservation of wildlife, and many detrimental impacts are associated with creating physical barriers. By contrast, virtual fences can restrict, control or minimize animal movement without the creation of physical barriers, and present key benefits over traditional fences, including: (1) no need for construction, maintenance or removal of traditional fences; (2) rapid modification of boundaries both temporally and spatially based on specific conservation concerns; (3) application of novel conservation approaches for wildlife that integrate monitoring, research and management; and (4) social‐psychological benefits that may increase support for conservation. We review the various types of sensory, biological and mechanical virtual fences, and the potential benefits and costs associated with fully integrating virtual fences into protected area management and wildlife conservation. The recent development of real‐time virtual fences represents the potential for a new ‘virtual management’ era in wildlife conservation, where it is possible to initiate management actions promptly in response to real‐time data. Wide‐scale application of virtual fences faces considerable technological and logistical constraints; however, virtual fences are increasingly popular and soon will offer realistic management strategies for both terrestrial and avian wildlife conservation.
AbstractList	Fences can both enhance and detract from the conservation of wildlife, and many detrimental impacts are associated with creating physical barriers. By contrast, virtual fences can restrict, control or minimize animal movement without the creation of physical barriers, and present key benefits over traditional fences, including: (1) no need for construction, maintenance or removal of traditional fences; (2) rapid modification of boundaries both temporally and spatially based on specific conservation concerns; (3) application of novel conservation approaches for wildlife that integrate monitoring, research and management; and (4) social‐psychological benefits that may increase support for conservation. We review the various types of sensory, biological and mechanical virtual fences, and the potential benefits and costs associated with fully integrating virtual fences into protected area management and wildlife conservation. The recent development of real‐time virtual fences represents the potential for a new ‘virtual management’ era in wildlife conservation, where it is possible to initiate management actions promptly in response to real‐time data. Wide‐scale application of virtual fences faces considerable technological and logistical constraints; however, virtual fences are increasingly popular and soon will offer realistic management strategies for both terrestrial and avian wildlife conservation. Fences can both enhance and detract from the conservation of wildlife, and many detrimental impacts are associated with creating physical barriers. By contrast, virtual fences can restrict, control or minimize animal movement without the creation of physical barriers, and present key benefits over traditional fences, including: (1) no need for construction, maintenance or removal of traditional fences; (2) rapid modification of boundaries both temporally and spatially based on specific conservation concerns; (3) application of novel conservation approaches for wildlife that integrate monitoring, research and management; and (4) social-psychological benefits that may increase support for conservation. We review the various types of sensory, biological and mechanical virtual fences, and the potential benefits and costs associated with fully integrating virtual fences into protected area management and wildlife conservation. The recent development of real-time virtual fences represents the potential for a new 'virtual management' era in wildlife conservation, where it is possible to initiate management actions promptly in response to real-time data. Wide-scale application of virtual fences faces considerable technological and logistical constraints; however, virtual fences are increasingly popular and soon will offer realistic management strategies for both terrestrial and avian wildlife conservation. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
Author	Millspaugh, J. J. Slotow, R. Jachowski, D. S.
Author_xml	– sequence: 1 givenname: D. S. surname: Jachowski fullname: Jachowski, D. S. email: djachowski@gmail.com organization: Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: R. surname: Slotow fullname: Slotow, R. organization: Amarula Elephant Research Programme, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville Campus, Durban, South Africa – sequence: 3 givenname: J. J. surname: Millspaugh fullname: Millspaugh, J. J. organization: Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences, University of Missouri, MO, Columbia, USA
BookMark	eNqF0MtKAzEUBuAgCl4XvsGAG12M5j5Td1JsFbwhRZchzZxodJrUZFr17Y1WXQhqNgnJ9x_Iv46WffCA0DbB-ySvA23m-4Timi6hNcJlryRVTyznM5NV2eMMr6L1lB4wJrRmZA0NhyE0xdzFbqbbwoI3kIqJfoTi7v3Bg7u7H4eYDoswnYasvOtcJjbEwgSfIM5154LfRCtWtwm2PvcNNBocj_on5dnl8LR_dFYaziQt6xpsIzVljbSN0FIzZhsCBJjAzIpeA4IbiTnPV4ZZUgsJYzwW2mQmJNtAu4ux0xieZpA6NXHJQNtqD2GWFJGSCVphiv-ngvGaEs54pjs_6EOYRZ__kRWtuOS50az2FsrEkFIEq6bRTXR8VQSr9_JVLl99lJ_twQ9rXPdRVBe1a_9KPLsWXn8frY76N1-JcpFwqYOX74SOj0pWrBLq9mKorkdX14OanKsL9gazxqZq
CitedBy_id	crossref_primary_10_1186_s13750_019_0153_7 crossref_primary_10_3390_ruminants5020021 crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy13112781 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani14142121 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10164_021_00700_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pecon_2023_07_004 crossref_primary_10_1002_wsb_806 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani12070842 crossref_primary_10_3390_f10050458 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rala_2024_06_003 crossref_primary_10_4103_cs_cs_16_132 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rama_2024_06_004 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10071_016_0989_y crossref_primary_10_1186_s40317_024_00389_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2025_125166 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rala_2024_05_006 crossref_primary_10_1111_acv_12403 crossref_primary_10_3389_frobt_2023_1145798 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_landurbplan_2018_08_012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rvsc_2024_105197 crossref_primary_10_1484_J_JHES_5_134040 crossref_primary_10_1002_2688_8319_12126 crossref_primary_10_1177_25148486211061704 crossref_primary_10_3390_agriengineering7010020 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_animal_2024_101231 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani14101506 crossref_primary_10_1111_jzo_12224 crossref_primary_10_3389_fvets_2021_637709 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani12213017 crossref_primary_10_1093_biosci_biab073 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10164_021_00731_0 crossref_primary_10_1002_wlb3_01146 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tree_2016_12_004 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40317_015_0087_y crossref_primary_10_3390_s16060912 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10764_023_00365_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10344_018_1175_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10806_020_09838_9 crossref_primary_10_1177_15245004231153085 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani12212965 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2024_110736 crossref_primary_10_3390_d17020087 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rama_2024_03_004 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani8030033 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tree_2016_02_017 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0202268
Cites_doi	10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199568994.001.0001 10.1007/s10886-009-9721-6 10.3957/056.042.0207 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103854 10.1007/978-1-4614-0902-1_15 10.1016/j.compag.2010.10.005 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.07.005 10.1564/21aug09 10.1371/journal.pone.0052813 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.041 10.1098/rstb.2010.0090 10.1007/978-1-4614-0902-1_6 10.2193/2008-503 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.09.022 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00182.x 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.12.029 10.1177/0278364906065375 10.1371/journal.pone.0010403 10.1186/1746-6148-8-93 10.1002/wsb.93 10.1371/journal.pone.0017983 10.1017/S0030605306000822 10.1353/book.336 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.09.024 10.1525/bio.2010.60.2.9 10.1890/070003 10.1002/jwmg.327 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00062.x 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01291.x 10.1002/wsb.142 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.03.010 10.3957/056.040.0107 10.1111/1365-2656.12039 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00063.x 10.1071/WR10021 10.2193/2008-266 10.69649/pachyderm.v20i1.827 10.1111/j.1749-7345.2002.tb00492.x 10.1002/wsb.234 10.1007/978-1-4614-0902-1_12 10.2174/1874453201205010082 10.1641/0006-3568(2006)056[0253:TFTEWN]2.0.CO;2 10.1890/100103 10.1126/science.334.6059.1042 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.08.008 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02185.x 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.06.013 10.1111/j.1365-2028.2011.01275.x 10.1007/978-1-4614-0902-1_2 10.1674/0003-0031-169.1.66 10.1017/S0030605311001104 10.1017/S0030605307001767 10.1371/journal.pone.0046636 10.1371/journal.pone.0031818 10.3161/000164511X625892 10.1073/pnas.1103317108 10.1016/j.tree.2008.12.006 10.1071/RJ06036 10.2193/2007-066
ContentType	Journal Article
Copyright	2013 The Zoological Society of London Animal Conservation © 2014 The Zoological Society of London
Copyright_xml	– notice: 2013 The Zoological Society of London – notice: Animal Conservation © 2014 The Zoological Society of London
DBID	BSCLL AAYXX CITATION 7SN 7SS 7ST 7U6 8FD C1K F1W FR3 H97 L.G P64 RC3 7S9 L.6
DOI	10.1111/acv.12082
DatabaseName	Istex CrossRef Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Environment Abstracts Sustainability Science Abstracts Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Engineering Research Database Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Genetics Abstracts AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitle	CrossRef Entomology Abstracts Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional Genetics Abstracts Technology Research Database Sustainability Science Abstracts ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Engineering Research Database Ecology Abstracts Environment Abstracts Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList	AGRICOLA Entomology Abstracts Ecology Abstracts CrossRef
DeliveryMethod	fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline	Ecology
EISSN	1469-1795
EndPage	196
ExternalDocumentID	3312735231 10_1111_acv_12082 ACV12082 ark_67375_WNG_RTPRF81M_N
Genre	reviewArticle
GrantInformation_xml	– fundername: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University – fundername: University of KwaZulu‐Natal – fundername: University of Missouri
GroupedDBID	-~X .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OC 23M 31~ 33P 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52W 52X 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHBH AAHQN AAMMB AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABITZ ABJNI ABPVW ABVKB ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFS ACPOU ACPRK ACRPL ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEFGJ AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEUYR AEYWJ AFBPY AFFPM AFGKR AFRAH AFWVQ AFZJQ AGHNM AGQPQ AGXDD AGYGG AHBTC AIDQK AIDYY AITYG AIURR AJXKR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AUFTA AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMNLL BMXJE BNHUX BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 CAG CHEAL COF CS3 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRSTM EBS ECGQY EJD EYRJQ F00 F01 F04 FEDTE G-S G.N GODZA H.T H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZI HZ~ IX1 J0M K48 L98 LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSTM MSFUL MSSTM MXFUL MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG P2P P2W P2X P4D Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K ROL RX1 SUPJJ UB1 W8V W99 WBKPD WIH WIK WNSPC WOHZO WQJ WXSBR WYISQ XG1 ZY4 ZZTAW ~IA ~KM ~WT AAHHS ABTAH ACCFJ ADZOD AEEZP AEQDE AEUQT AFPWT AIWBW AJBDE RIG WRC AAYXX CITATION O8X 7SN 7SS 7ST 7U6 8FD C1K F1W FR3 H97 L.G P64 RC3 7S9 L.6
ID	FETCH-LOGICAL-c4362-88efd6a23d6fd5a6a33fd1e1e3503f59de54c6044e1ec3f1856eb0b5acfd1563
IEDL.DBID	DRFUL
ISICitedReferencesCount	55
ISICitedReferencesURI	http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000337525600001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN	1367-9430
IngestDate	Fri Sep 05 17:30:46 EDT 2025 Tue Oct 07 09:28:58 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 12:22:22 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:10:38 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 07:58:01 EST 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:52:59 EST 2025 Tue Sep 09 05:31:07 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess	false
IsOpenAccess	true
IsPeerReviewed	true
IsScholarly	true
Issue	3
Language	English
LinkModel	DirectLink
MergedId	FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4362-88efd6a23d6fd5a6a33fd1e1e3503f59de54c6044e1ec3f1856eb0b5acfd1563
Notes	ark:/67375/WNG-RTPRF81M-N Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University University of KwaZulu-Natal ArticleID:ACV12082 istex:9D938E3BD2D7D8ECA44CE8D0ADC62F05B39431A3 University of Missouri ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23
OpenAccessLink	https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/acv.12082
PQID	1527464208
PQPubID	866372
PageCount	10
ParticipantIDs	proquest_miscellaneous_1663527020 proquest_miscellaneous_1534821434 proquest_journals_1527464208 crossref_primary_10_1111_acv_12082 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_acv_12082 wiley_primary_10_1111_acv_12082_ACV12082 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_RTPRF81M_N
PublicationCentury	2000
PublicationDate	June 2014
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD	2014-06-01
PublicationDate_xml	– month: 06 year: 2014 text: June 2014
PublicationDecade	2010
PublicationPlace	London
PublicationPlace_xml	– name: London
PublicationTitle	Animal conservation
PublicationTitleAlternate	Anim Conserv
PublicationYear	2014
Publisher	Blackwell Publishing Ltd Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml	– name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References	Tomkiewicz, S.M., Fuller, M.R., Kie, J.G. & Bates, K.K. (2010). Global positioning system and associated technologies in animal behaviour and ecological research. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 365, 2163-2176. Licht, D.S., Slotow, R. & Millspaugh, J.J. (2008). Out of Africa: lessons from park management in South Africa. George Wright Forum 25, 20-29. Katzner, T.E., Brandes, D., Miller, T., Lanzone, M., Maisonneuve, C., Tremblay, J.A., Mulvihill, R. & Merovich, G.T. (2012). Topography drives migratory flight altitude of golden eagles: implications for on-shore wind energy development. J. Appl. Ecol. 49, 1178-1186. Licht, D.S., Millspaugh, J.J., Kunkel, K.E., Kochanny, C.O. & Peterson, R.O. (2010). Using small populations of wolves for ecosystem restoration and stewardship. BioScience 60, 147-153. Avila-Flores, R.A., Boyce, M.S. & Boutin, S. (2010). Habitat selection by prairie dogs in a disturbed landscape at the edge of their geographic range. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 74, 945-953. Hayward, M.W., Somers, M.J., Kerley, G.I., Perrin, M.R., Bester, M.N., Dalerum, F., Do Linh San, E., Hoffman, L.C., Marshal, J.P., Mills, M.G.L., Nel, J.A.J. & Owen-Smith, N. (2012). Animal ethics and ecotourism. S. Afr. J. Wildl. Res. 42, iii-iiv. Anderson, D.M. (2007). Virtual fencing: past, present and future. Rangeland J. 29, 65-78. Parker, G.E. & Osborn, F.V. (2006). Investigating the potential for chilli Capsicum spp. to reduce human-wildlife conflict in Zimbabwe. Oryx 40, 343-346. Hawley, J.E., Gehring, T.M., Schultz, R.N., Rossler, S.T. & Wydeven, A.P. (2009). Assessment of shock collars as nonlethal management for wolves in Wisconsin. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 73, 518-525. Kimball, B.A., Taylor, J., Perry, K.R. & Capelli, C. (2009). Deer responses to repellent stimuli. J. Chem. Ecol. 35, 1461-1470. Kotchemidova, C. (2008). The culture of the fence: artifacts and meanings. Counterblast - J. Cult. Comm. 2, 1-4. de Lucas, M., Ferrer, M., Bechard, M.J. & Muñoz, A.R. (2012). Griffon vulture mortality at wind farms in southern Spain: distribution of fatalities and active mitigation measures. Biol. Conserv. 147, 184-189. Rossler, S.T., Gehring, T.M., Schultz, R.N., Rossler, M.T., Wydeven, A.P. & Hawley, J.E. (2012). Shock collars as a site-aversive conditioning tool for wolves. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 36, 176-184. Druce, H.C., Pretorius, K. & Slotow, R. (2008). The response of an elephant population to conservation area expansion: Phinda Private Game Reserve, South Africa. Biol. Conserv. 141, 3127-3138. Loarie, S., van Aarde, R. & Pimm, S. (2009). Fences and artificial water affect African savannah elephant movement patterns. Biol. Conserv. 142, 3086-3098. Lagendijk, D.D.G., Mackey, R.L., Page, B.R. & Slotow, R. (2011). The effects of herbivory by a mega- and mesoherbivore on tree recruitment in Sand Forest, South Africa. PLoS ONE 6, e17983. Lee, C., Henshall, J.M., Wark, T.J., Crossman, C.C., Reed, M.T., Brewer, H.G., O'Grady, J. & Fisher, A.D. (2009). Associative learning by cattle to enable effective and ethical virtual fences. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 119, 15-22. Breck, S.W., Williamson, R., Niemeyer, C. & Shivik, J.A. (2002). Non-lethal radio activated guard for deterring wolf depredation in Idaho: summary and call for research. Vertebr. Pest Conf. 20, 223-226. Cozzi, G., Broekhuis, F., McNutt, J.W. & Schmid, B. (2013). Comparison of the effects of artificial and natural barriers on large African carnivores: implications for interspecific relationships and connectivity. J. Anim. Ecol. 82, 707-715. Cogan, C.B., D'Elia, J., Convery, K., Brandt, J. & Bulgerin, T. (2012). Analysis of California condor (Gymnogyps californianus) activity using satellite telemetry data. Open Ornithol. J. 5, 82-93. Osborn, F.V. & Rasmussen, L.E.L. (1995). Evidence for the effectiveness of an oleo-resin capsicum against wild elephants in Zimbabwe. Pachyderm 20, 15-22. Hayward, M.W. & Kerley, G.I.H. (2009). Fencing for conservation: restriction of evolutionary potential or a riposte to threatening processes? Biol. Conserv. 142, 1-13. Wallace, G.E. & Hill, C.M. (2012). Crop damage by primates: quantifying the key parameters of crop-raiding events. PLoS ONE 7, e46636. Williams, B.K. (2011). Adaptive management of natural resources - framework and issues. J. Environ. Manage. 92, 1346-1353. Jachowski, D.S., Slotow, R. & Millspaugh, J.J. (2012). Physiological stress and refuge behavior by African elephants. PLoS ONE 7, e31818. Terhune, J.M., Hoover, C.L. & Jacobs, S.R. (2002). Potential detection and deterrence ranges by harbor seals of underwater acoustic harassment devices (AHD) in the Bay of Fundy, Canada. J. World Aquacult. Soc. 33, 176-183. Davies, T.E., Wilson, S., Hazarika, N., Chakrabarty, J., Das, D., Hodgson, D.J. & Zimmermann, A. (2011). Effectiveness of intervention methods against crop-raiding elephants. Conserv. Lett. 4, 346-354. Mithöfer, A. & Boland, W. (2012). Plant defense against herbivores: chemical aspects. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 63, 431-450. Phipps, W.L., Willis, S.G., Wolter, K. & Naidoo, V. (2013). Foraging ranges of immature African white-backed vultures (Gyps africanus) and their use of protected areas in Southern Africa. PLoS ONE 8, e52813. Hawley, J.E., Rossler, S.T., Gehring, T.M., Schultz, R.N., Callahan, P.A., Clark, R., Cade, J. & Wydeven, A.P. (2013). Developing a new shock-collar design for safe and efficient use on wild wolves. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 37, 416-422. Umstatter, C. (2011). The evolution of virtual fences: a review. Comput. Electron. Agr. 75, 10-22. Benson, E. (2010). Wired wilderness: technologies of tracking and the making of modern wildlife. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Linklater, W.L. & Hutcheson, I.R. (2010). Black rhinoceros are slow to colonize a harvested neighbor's range. S. Afr. J. Wildl. Res. 40, 58-63. Pennisi, E. (2011). Global tracking of small animals gains momentum. Science 334, 1042. Shivik, J.A. (2006). Tools for the edge: what's new for conserving carnivores. BioScience 56, 253-259. Musiani, M., Mamo, C., Boitani, L., Callaghan, C., Gates, C.C., Mattei, L., Visalberghi, E., Breck, S. & Volpi, G. (2003). Wolf depredation trends and the use of fladry barriers to protect livestock in western North America. Conserv. Biol. 17, 1538-1547. Bode, M. & Wintle, B. (2009). How to build an efficient conservation fence. Conserv. Biol. 24, 182-188. García-Ripollés, C., López-López, P. & Urios, V. (2011). Ranging behaviour of non-breeding Eurasian griffon vultures Gyps fulvus: a GPS-telemetry study. Acta Ornithol. 46, 127-134. Newmark, W.D. (2008). Isolation of African protected areas. Front. Ecol. Environ. 6, 321-328. King, L.E., Douglas-Hamilton, I. & Vollrath, F. (2011). Beehive fences as effective deterrents for crop-raiding elephants: field trials in northern Kenya. Afr. J. Ecol. 49, 431-439. Ferrero, D.M., Lemon, J.K., Fluegge, D., Pashkovski, S.L., Korzan, W.J., Datta, S.R., Spehr, M., Fendt, M. & Liberles, S.D. (2011). Detection and avoidance of acarnivore odor by prey. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 11235-11240. Vanak, A.T., Thaker, M. & Slotow, R. (2010). Do fences create an edge-effect on the movement patterns of a highly mobile mega-herbivore? Biol. Conserv. 143, 2631-2637. Walter, W.D., Lavelle, M.J., Fischer, J.W., Johnson, T.L., Hygnstrom, S.E. & VerCauteren, K.C. (2011). Management of damage by elk (Cervus elaphus) in North America: a review. Wildl. Res. 37, 630-646. Kimball, B.A. & Taylor, J.D. (2010). Mammalian herbivore repellents: tools for altering plant palatability. Outlooks Pest Manage. 21, 181-187. Blackwell, E.J., Bolster, C., Richards, G., Loftus, B.A. & Casey, R.A. (2012). The use of electronic collars for training domestic dogs: estimated prevalence, reasons and risk factors for use, and owner perceived success as compared to other training methods. BMC Vet. Res. 8, 93. Hayward, M.W., Adendorff, J., O'Brien, J., Sholto-Douglas, A., Bissett, C., Moolman, L.C., Bean, P., Fogarty, A., Howarth, D., Slater, R. & Kerley, G.I.H. (2007). The reintroduction of large carnivores to the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa: an assessment. Oryx 41, 205-214. Piorkowski, M.D., Farnsworth, A.J., Fry, M., Rohrbaugh, R.W., Fitzpatrick, J.W. & Rosenberg, K.V. (2012). Research priorities for wind energy and migratory wildlife. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 76, 451-456. Darrow, P.A. & Shivik, J.A. (2009). Bold, shy, and persistent: variable coyote response to light and sound stimuli. App. Anim. Behav. Sci. 15, 82-87. Moll, R.J., Millspaugh, J.J., Beringer, J., Sartwell, J., Woods, R.J. & Vercauteren, K.C. (2009). Physiological stress response of captive white-tailed deer to video collars. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 73, 609-614. Arnett, E.B., Huso, M.M., Schirmacher, M.R. & Hayes, J.P. (2011). Altering turbine speed reduces bat mortality at wind-energy facilities. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 209-214. Gehring, T.M., VerCauteren, K. & Cellar, A.C. (2011). Good fences make good neighbors: implementation of electric fencing for establishing effective livestock-protection dogs. Hum.-Wildl. Int. 5, 106-111. Graham, M.D., Adams, W.M. & Kahiro, G.N. (2012). Cell phone communication in effective human elephant-conflict management in Laikipia County, Kenya. Oryx 46, 137-144. Butler, Z., Corke, P., Peterson, R. & Rus, D. (2006). From robots to animals: virtual fences for controlling cattle. Int. J. Robot. Res. 25, 485-508. Osburn, D.J. & Cramer, M.J. (2013). Foraging response of Erethizon dorsatum and Lepus americanus to specialized and generalized predator scents. Am. Midl. Nat. 169, 66-73. Parsons, M.H. & Blumstein, D.T. (2010). Familiarity breeds contempt: kangaroos persistently avoid areas with experimentally deployed dingo scents. PLoS ONE 5, e10403. Shivik, J.A., Treves, A. & Callahan, P. (2003). Nonlethal techniques for managing predation: primary and secondary repellents. Conserv. Biol. 17, 1531-1537. Milner-Gulland, E.J. , Fryxell, J.M. & Sinclair, A.R.E. (Eds) (2011). Animal migration: a synthesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ricciardi, A. & Simberloff, D. (2009). Assisted colonization is not a v 2010; 143 2013; 169 2003; 17 2008; 6 2008; 2 2009; 119 2013; 8 2008; 141 2010; 60 1995; 20 2007; 29 2010; 21 2006; 25 2008; 25 2010; 5 2010; 74 2009; 15 2012; 63 2011; 334 2009; 24 2012 2006; 56 2011 2010 2010; 365 2002; 33 2009 2011; 75 2006 2011; 37 2011; 4 2012; 147 2012; 36 2011; 6 2011; 5 2012; 76 2010; 40 2011; 9 2009; 35 2013; 37 2011; 108 2009; 73 2012; 1 2006; 40 2002; 20 2011; 92 2013; 82 2011; 46 2012; 49 2009; 142 2007; 41 2012; 46 2012; 7 2011; 49 2012; 5 2012; 42 2012; 8 Kotchemidova C. (e_1_2_7_34_1) 2008; 2 e_1_2_7_5_1 e_1_2_7_3_1 e_1_2_7_7_1 e_1_2_7_19_1 e_1_2_7_60_1 e_1_2_7_17_1 e_1_2_7_62_1 e_1_2_7_15_1 e_1_2_7_41_1 e_1_2_7_64_1 e_1_2_7_13_1 e_1_2_7_66_1 e_1_2_7_11_1 e_1_2_7_45_1 e_1_2_7_68_1 e_1_2_7_47_1 e_1_2_7_26_1 e_1_2_7_28_1 Licht D.S. (e_1_2_7_37_1) 2008; 25 Osborn F.V. (e_1_2_7_49_1) 1995; 20 e_1_2_7_50_1 e_1_2_7_25_1 e_1_2_7_31_1 e_1_2_7_52_1 e_1_2_7_23_1 e_1_2_7_33_1 e_1_2_7_54_1 Millspaugh J.J. (e_1_2_7_43_1) 2012 e_1_2_7_21_1 e_1_2_7_35_1 e_1_2_7_56_1 e_1_2_7_58_1 e_1_2_7_39_1 e_1_2_7_6_1 Gehring T.M. (e_1_2_7_20_1) 2011; 5 e_1_2_7_4_1 e_1_2_7_8_1 e_1_2_7_18_1 e_1_2_7_16_1 e_1_2_7_40_1 e_1_2_7_61_1 e_1_2_7_2_1 e_1_2_7_14_1 e_1_2_7_42_1 e_1_2_7_63_1 e_1_2_7_12_1 e_1_2_7_44_1 e_1_2_7_65_1 e_1_2_7_10_1 e_1_2_7_46_1 e_1_2_7_67_1 e_1_2_7_48_1 e_1_2_7_69_1 Breck S.W. (e_1_2_7_9_1) 2002; 20 e_1_2_7_27_1 e_1_2_7_29_1 e_1_2_7_51_1 e_1_2_7_30_1 e_1_2_7_53_1 e_1_2_7_24_1 e_1_2_7_32_1 e_1_2_7_55_1 e_1_2_7_22_1 e_1_2_7_57_1 e_1_2_7_36_1 e_1_2_7_59_1 e_1_2_7_38_1
References_xml	– reference: de Lucas, M., Ferrer, M., Bechard, M.J. & Muñoz, A.R. (2012). Griffon vulture mortality at wind farms in southern Spain: distribution of fatalities and active mitigation measures. Biol. Conserv. 147, 184-189. – reference: Bode, M. & Wintle, B. (2009). How to build an efficient conservation fence. Conserv. Biol. 24, 182-188. – reference: Hayward, M.W., Somers, M.J., Kerley, G.I., Perrin, M.R., Bester, M.N., Dalerum, F., Do Linh San, E., Hoffman, L.C., Marshal, J.P., Mills, M.G.L., Nel, J.A.J. & Owen-Smith, N. (2012). Animal ethics and ecotourism. S. Afr. J. Wildl. Res. 42, iii-iiv. – reference: Moll, R.J., Millspaugh, J.J., Beringer, J., Sartwell, J., Woods, R.J. & Vercauteren, K.C. (2009). Physiological stress response of captive white-tailed deer to video collars. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 73, 609-614. – reference: King, L.E., Douglas-Hamilton, I. & Vollrath, F. (2011). Beehive fences as effective deterrents for crop-raiding elephants: field trials in northern Kenya. Afr. J. Ecol. 49, 431-439. – reference: Cogan, C.B., D'Elia, J., Convery, K., Brandt, J. & Bulgerin, T. (2012). Analysis of California condor (Gymnogyps californianus) activity using satellite telemetry data. Open Ornithol. J. 5, 82-93. – reference: Druce, H.C., Pretorius, K. & Slotow, R. (2008). The response of an elephant population to conservation area expansion: Phinda Private Game Reserve, South Africa. Biol. Conserv. 141, 3127-3138. – reference: Kimball, B.A., Taylor, J., Perry, K.R. & Capelli, C. (2009). Deer responses to repellent stimuli. J. Chem. Ecol. 35, 1461-1470. – reference: Mithöfer, A. & Boland, W. (2012). Plant defense against herbivores: chemical aspects. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 63, 431-450. – reference: Kimball, B.A. & Taylor, J.D. (2010). Mammalian herbivore repellents: tools for altering plant palatability. Outlooks Pest Manage. 21, 181-187. – reference: Williams, B.K. (2011). Adaptive management of natural resources - framework and issues. J. Environ. Manage. 92, 1346-1353. – reference: Shivik, J.A., Treves, A. & Callahan, P. (2003). Nonlethal techniques for managing predation: primary and secondary repellents. Conserv. Biol. 17, 1531-1537. – reference: Lagendijk, D.D.G., Mackey, R.L., Page, B.R. & Slotow, R. (2011). The effects of herbivory by a mega- and mesoherbivore on tree recruitment in Sand Forest, South Africa. PLoS ONE 6, e17983. – reference: Ricciardi, A. & Simberloff, D. (2009). Assisted colonization is not a viable conservation strategy. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 248-253. – reference: Hawley, J.E., Rossler, S.T., Gehring, T.M., Schultz, R.N., Callahan, P.A., Clark, R., Cade, J. & Wydeven, A.P. (2013). Developing a new shock-collar design for safe and efficient use on wild wolves. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 37, 416-422. – reference: Stevens, B.S., Reese, K.P., Connelly, J.W. & Musil, D.D. (2012). Greater sage-grouse and fences: does marking reduce collisions? Wildl. Soc. Bull. 36, 297-303. – reference: Breck, S.W., Williamson, R., Niemeyer, C. & Shivik, J.A. (2002). Non-lethal radio activated guard for deterring wolf depredation in Idaho: summary and call for research. Vertebr. Pest Conf. 20, 223-226. – reference: Darrow, P.A. & Shivik, J.A. (2009). Bold, shy, and persistent: variable coyote response to light and sound stimuli. App. Anim. Behav. Sci. 15, 82-87. – reference: Ferrero, D.M., Lemon, J.K., Fluegge, D., Pashkovski, S.L., Korzan, W.J., Datta, S.R., Spehr, M., Fendt, M. & Liberles, S.D. (2011). Detection and avoidance of acarnivore odor by prey. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 11235-11240. – reference: Loarie, S., van Aarde, R. & Pimm, S. (2009). Fences and artificial water affect African savannah elephant movement patterns. Biol. Conserv. 142, 3086-3098. – reference: Hayward, M.W., Adendorff, J., O'Brien, J., Sholto-Douglas, A., Bissett, C., Moolman, L.C., Bean, P., Fogarty, A., Howarth, D., Slater, R. & Kerley, G.I.H. (2007). The reintroduction of large carnivores to the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa: an assessment. Oryx 41, 205-214. – reference: Butler, Z., Corke, P., Peterson, R. & Rus, D. (2006). From robots to animals: virtual fences for controlling cattle. Int. J. Robot. Res. 25, 485-508. – reference: Piorkowski, M.D., Farnsworth, A.J., Fry, M., Rohrbaugh, R.W., Fitzpatrick, J.W. & Rosenberg, K.V. (2012). Research priorities for wind energy and migratory wildlife. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 76, 451-456. – reference: Cozzi, G., Broekhuis, F., McNutt, J.W. & Schmid, B. (2013). Comparison of the effects of artificial and natural barriers on large African carnivores: implications for interspecific relationships and connectivity. J. Anim. Ecol. 82, 707-715. – reference: Terhune, J.M., Hoover, C.L. & Jacobs, S.R. (2002). Potential detection and deterrence ranges by harbor seals of underwater acoustic harassment devices (AHD) in the Bay of Fundy, Canada. J. World Aquacult. Soc. 33, 176-183. – reference: Kotchemidova, C. (2008). The culture of the fence: artifacts and meanings. Counterblast - J. Cult. Comm. 2, 1-4. – reference: Graham, M.D., Adams, W.M. & Kahiro, G.N. (2012). Cell phone communication in effective human elephant-conflict management in Laikipia County, Kenya. Oryx 46, 137-144. – reference: Hayward, M.W. & Kerley, G.I.H. (2009). Fencing for conservation: restriction of evolutionary potential or a riposte to threatening processes? Biol. Conserv. 142, 1-13. – reference: Parker, G.E. & Osborn, F.V. (2006). Investigating the potential for chilli Capsicum spp. to reduce human-wildlife conflict in Zimbabwe. Oryx 40, 343-346. – reference: Umstatter, C. (2011). The evolution of virtual fences: a review. Comput. Electron. Agr. 75, 10-22. – reference: Licht, D.S., Slotow, R. & Millspaugh, J.J. (2008). Out of Africa: lessons from park management in South Africa. George Wright Forum 25, 20-29. – reference: Gehring, T.M., VerCauteren, K. & Cellar, A.C. (2011). Good fences make good neighbors: implementation of electric fencing for establishing effective livestock-protection dogs. Hum.-Wildl. Int. 5, 106-111. – reference: Katzner, T.E., Brandes, D., Miller, T., Lanzone, M., Maisonneuve, C., Tremblay, J.A., Mulvihill, R. & Merovich, G.T. (2012). Topography drives migratory flight altitude of golden eagles: implications for on-shore wind energy development. J. Appl. Ecol. 49, 1178-1186. – reference: García-Ripollés, C., López-López, P. & Urios, V. (2011). Ranging behaviour of non-breeding Eurasian griffon vultures Gyps fulvus: a GPS-telemetry study. Acta Ornithol. 46, 127-134. – reference: Musiani, M., Mamo, C., Boitani, L., Callaghan, C., Gates, C.C., Mattei, L., Visalberghi, E., Breck, S. & Volpi, G. (2003). Wolf depredation trends and the use of fladry barriers to protect livestock in western North America. Conserv. Biol. 17, 1538-1547. – reference: Hawley, J.E., Gehring, T.M., Schultz, R.N., Rossler, S.T. & Wydeven, A.P. (2009). Assessment of shock collars as nonlethal management for wolves in Wisconsin. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 73, 518-525. – reference: Milner-Gulland, E.J. , Fryxell, J.M. & Sinclair, A.R.E. (Eds) (2011). Animal migration: a synthesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. – reference: Licht, D.S., Millspaugh, J.J., Kunkel, K.E., Kochanny, C.O. & Peterson, R.O. (2010). Using small populations of wolves for ecosystem restoration and stewardship. BioScience 60, 147-153. – reference: Blackwell, E.J., Bolster, C., Richards, G., Loftus, B.A. & Casey, R.A. (2012). The use of electronic collars for training domestic dogs: estimated prevalence, reasons and risk factors for use, and owner perceived success as compared to other training methods. BMC Vet. Res. 8, 93. – reference: Avila-Flores, R.A., Boyce, M.S. & Boutin, S. (2010). Habitat selection by prairie dogs in a disturbed landscape at the edge of their geographic range. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 74, 945-953. – reference: Vanak, A.T., Thaker, M. & Slotow, R. (2010). Do fences create an edge-effect on the movement patterns of a highly mobile mega-herbivore? Biol. Conserv. 143, 2631-2637. – reference: Wallace, G.E. & Hill, C.M. (2012). Crop damage by primates: quantifying the key parameters of crop-raiding events. PLoS ONE 7, e46636. – reference: Parsons, M.H. & Blumstein, D.T. (2010). Familiarity breeds contempt: kangaroos persistently avoid areas with experimentally deployed dingo scents. PLoS ONE 5, e10403. – reference: Davies, T.E., Wilson, S., Hazarika, N., Chakrabarty, J., Das, D., Hodgson, D.J. & Zimmermann, A. (2011). Effectiveness of intervention methods against crop-raiding elephants. Conserv. Lett. 4, 346-354. – reference: Pennisi, E. (2011). Global tracking of small animals gains momentum. Science 334, 1042. – reference: Anderson, D.M. (2007). Virtual fencing: past, present and future. Rangeland J. 29, 65-78. – reference: Newmark, W.D. (2008). Isolation of African protected areas. Front. Ecol. Environ. 6, 321-328. – reference: Rossler, S.T., Gehring, T.M., Schultz, R.N., Rossler, M.T., Wydeven, A.P. & Hawley, J.E. (2012). Shock collars as a site-aversive conditioning tool for wolves. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 36, 176-184. – reference: Lee, C., Henshall, J.M., Wark, T.J., Crossman, C.C., Reed, M.T., Brewer, H.G., O'Grady, J. & Fisher, A.D. (2009). Associative learning by cattle to enable effective and ethical virtual fences. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 119, 15-22. – reference: Osburn, D.J. & Cramer, M.J. (2013). Foraging response of Erethizon dorsatum and Lepus americanus to specialized and generalized predator scents. Am. Midl. Nat. 169, 66-73. – reference: Tomkiewicz, S.M., Fuller, M.R., Kie, J.G. & Bates, K.K. (2010). Global positioning system and associated technologies in animal behaviour and ecological research. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 365, 2163-2176. – reference: Arnett, E.B., Huso, M.M., Schirmacher, M.R. & Hayes, J.P. (2011). Altering turbine speed reduces bat mortality at wind-energy facilities. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 209-214. – reference: Phipps, W.L., Willis, S.G., Wolter, K. & Naidoo, V. (2013). Foraging ranges of immature African white-backed vultures (Gyps africanus) and their use of protected areas in Southern Africa. PLoS ONE 8, e52813. – reference: Shivik, J.A. (2006). Tools for the edge: what's new for conserving carnivores. BioScience 56, 253-259. – reference: Benson, E. (2010). Wired wilderness: technologies of tracking and the making of modern wildlife. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. – reference: Walter, W.D., Lavelle, M.J., Fischer, J.W., Johnson, T.L., Hygnstrom, S.E. & VerCauteren, K.C. (2011). Management of damage by elk (Cervus elaphus) in North America: a review. Wildl. Res. 37, 630-646. – reference: Osborn, F.V. & Rasmussen, L.E.L. (1995). Evidence for the effectiveness of an oleo-resin capsicum against wild elephants in Zimbabwe. Pachyderm 20, 15-22. – reference: Jachowski, D.S., Slotow, R. & Millspaugh, J.J. (2012). Physiological stress and refuge behavior by African elephants. PLoS ONE 7, e31818. – reference: Linklater, W.L. & Hutcheson, I.R. (2010). Black rhinoceros are slow to colonize a harvested neighbor's range. S. Afr. J. Wildl. Res. 40, 58-63. – year: 2011 – volume: 141 start-page: 3127 year: 2008 end-page: 3138 article-title: The response of an elephant population to conservation area expansion: Phinda Private Game Reserve, South Africa publication-title: Biol. Conserv. – year: 2009 – volume: 4 start-page: 346 year: 2011 end-page: 354 article-title: Effectiveness of intervention methods against crop‐raiding elephants publication-title: Conserv. Lett. – volume: 36 start-page: 176 year: 2012 end-page: 184 article-title: Shock collars as a site‐aversive conditioning tool for wolves publication-title: Wildl. Soc. Bull. – volume: 42 start-page: iii year: 2012 end-page: iiv article-title: Animal ethics and ecotourism publication-title: S. Afr. J. Wildl. Res. – volume: 36 start-page: 297 year: 2012 end-page: 303 article-title: Greater sage‐grouse and fences: does marking reduce collisions? publication-title: Wildl. Soc. Bull. – volume: 142 start-page: 1 year: 2009 end-page: 13 article-title: Fencing for conservation: restriction of evolutionary potential or a riposte to threatening processes? publication-title: Biol. Conserv. – volume: 21 start-page: 181 year: 2010 end-page: 187 article-title: Mammalian herbivore repellents: tools for altering plant palatability publication-title: Outlooks Pest Manage. – volume: 76 start-page: 451 year: 2012 end-page: 456 article-title: Research priorities for wind energy and migratory wildlife publication-title: J. Wildl. Mgmt. – volume: 35 start-page: 1461 year: 2009 end-page: 1470 article-title: Deer responses to repellent stimuli publication-title: J. Chem. Ecol. – volume: 40 start-page: 58 year: 2010 end-page: 63 article-title: Black rhinoceros are slow to colonize a harvested neighbor's range publication-title: S. Afr. J. Wildl. Res. – volume: 49 start-page: 1178 year: 2012 end-page: 1186 article-title: Topography drives migratory flight altitude of golden eagles: implications for on‐shore wind energy development publication-title: J. Appl. Ecol. – start-page: 277 year: 2012 end-page: 294 – volume: 24 start-page: 182 year: 2009 end-page: 188 article-title: How to build an efficient conservation fence publication-title: Conserv. Biol. – volume: 8 start-page: e52813 year: 2013 article-title: Foraging ranges of immature African white‐backed vultures ( ) and their use of protected areas in Southern Africa publication-title: PLoS ONE – volume: 108 start-page: 11235 year: 2011 end-page: 11240 article-title: Detection and avoidance of acarnivore odor by prey publication-title: Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA – volume: 2 start-page: 1 year: 2008 end-page: 4 article-title: The culture of the fence: artifacts and meanings publication-title: Counterblast – J. Cult. Comm. – volume: 73 start-page: 609 year: 2009 end-page: 614 article-title: Physiological stress response of captive white‐tailed deer to video collars publication-title: J. Wildl. Mgmt. – volume: 92 start-page: 1346 year: 2011 end-page: 1353 article-title: Adaptive management of natural resources – framework and issues publication-title: J. Environ. Manage. – volume: 33 start-page: 176 year: 2002 end-page: 183 article-title: Potential detection and deterrence ranges by harbor seals of underwater acoustic harassment devices (AHD) in the Bay of Fundy, Canada publication-title: J. World Aquacult. Soc. – volume: 37 start-page: 416 year: 2013 end-page: 422 article-title: Developing a new shock‐collar design for safe and efficient use on wild wolves publication-title: Wildl. Soc. Bull. – start-page: 215 year: 2012 end-page: 234 – volume: 75 start-page: 10 year: 2011 end-page: 22 article-title: The evolution of virtual fences: a review publication-title: Comput. Electron. Agr. – volume: 25 start-page: 20 year: 2008 end-page: 29 article-title: Out of Africa: lessons from park management in South Africa publication-title: George Wright Forum – volume: 25 start-page: 485 year: 2006 end-page: 508 article-title: From robots to animals: virtual fences for controlling cattle publication-title: Int. J. Robot. Res. – volume: 142 start-page: 3086 year: 2009 end-page: 3098 article-title: Fences and artificial water affect African savannah elephant movement patterns publication-title: Biol. Conserv. – volume: 24 start-page: 248 year: 2009 end-page: 253 article-title: Assisted colonization is not a viable conservation strategy publication-title: Trends Ecol. Evol. – volume: 56 start-page: 253 year: 2006 end-page: 259 article-title: Tools for the edge: what's new for conserving carnivores publication-title: BioScience – volume: 82 start-page: 707 year: 2013 end-page: 715 article-title: Comparison of the effects of artificial and natural barriers on large African carnivores: implications for interspecific relationships and connectivity publication-title: J. Anim. Ecol. – volume: 334 start-page: 1042 year: 2011 article-title: Global tracking of small animals gains momentum publication-title: Science – volume: 5 start-page: 106 year: 2011 end-page: 111 article-title: Good fences make good neighbors: implementation of electric fencing for establishing effective livestock‐protection dogs publication-title: Hum.‐Wildl. Int. – start-page: 7 year: 2012 end-page: 20 – volume: 143 start-page: 2631 year: 2010 end-page: 2637 article-title: Do fences create an edge‐effect on the movement patterns of a highly mobile mega‐herbivore? publication-title: Biol. Conserv. – volume: 8 start-page: 93 year: 2012 article-title: The use of electronic collars for training domestic dogs: estimated prevalence, reasons and risk factors for use, and owner perceived success as compared to other training methods publication-title: BMC Vet. Res. – volume: 37 start-page: 630 year: 2011 end-page: 646 article-title: Management of damage by elk ( ) in North America: a review publication-title: Wildl. Res. – volume: 5 start-page: 82 year: 2012 end-page: 93 article-title: Analysis of California condor ( ) activity using satellite telemetry data publication-title: Open Ornithol. J. – volume: 6 start-page: e17983 year: 2011 article-title: The effects of herbivory by a mega‐ and mesoherbivore on tree recruitment in Sand Forest, South Africa publication-title: PLoS ONE – volume: 60 start-page: 147 year: 2010 end-page: 153 article-title: Using small populations of wolves for ecosystem restoration and stewardship publication-title: BioScience – volume: 46 start-page: 137 year: 2012 end-page: 144 article-title: Cell phone communication in effective human elephant‐conflict management in Laikipia County, Kenya publication-title: Oryx – volume: 7 start-page: e46636 year: 2012 article-title: Crop damage by primates: quantifying the key parameters of crop‐raiding events publication-title: PLoS ONE – volume: 49 start-page: 431 year: 2011 end-page: 439 article-title: Beehive fences as effective deterrents for crop‐raiding elephants: field trials in northern Kenya publication-title: Afr. J. Ecol. – volume: 46 start-page: 127 year: 2011 end-page: 134 article-title: Ranging behaviour of non‐breeding Eurasian griffon vultures : a GPS‐telemetry study publication-title: Acta Ornithol. – volume: 119 start-page: 15 year: 2009 end-page: 22 article-title: Associative learning by cattle to enable effective and ethical virtual fences publication-title: Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. – volume: 41 start-page: 205 year: 2007 end-page: 214 article-title: The reintroduction of large carnivores to the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa: an assessment publication-title: Oryx – start-page: 91 year: 2012 end-page: 104 – year: 2010 – volume: 147 start-page: 184 year: 2012 end-page: 189 article-title: Griffon vulture mortality at wind farms in southern Spain: distribution of fatalities and active mitigation measures publication-title: Biol. Conserv. – volume: 17 start-page: 1531 year: 2003 end-page: 1537 article-title: Nonlethal techniques for managing predation: primary and secondary repellents publication-title: Conserv. Biol. – volume: 9 start-page: 209 year: 2011 end-page: 214 article-title: Altering turbine speed reduces bat mortality at wind‐energy facilities publication-title: Front. Ecol. Environ. – volume: 40 start-page: 343 year: 2006 end-page: 346 article-title: Investigating the potential for chilli spp. to reduce human‐wildlife conflict in Zimbabwe publication-title: Oryx – volume: 6 start-page: 321 year: 2008 end-page: 328 article-title: Isolation of African protected areas publication-title: Front. Ecol. Environ. – volume: 20 start-page: 15 year: 1995 end-page: 22 article-title: Evidence for the effectiveness of an oleo‐resin capsicum against wild elephants in Zimbabwe publication-title: Pachyderm – year: 2006 – volume: 29 start-page: 65 year: 2007 end-page: 78 article-title: Virtual fencing: past, present and future publication-title: Rangeland J. – volume: 20 start-page: 223 year: 2002 end-page: 226 article-title: Non‐lethal radio activated guard for deterring wolf depredation in Idaho: summary and call for research publication-title: Vertebr. Pest Conf. – volume: 73 start-page: 518 year: 2009 end-page: 525 article-title: Assessment of shock collars as nonlethal management for wolves in Wisconsin publication-title: J. Wildl. Mgmt. – volume: 63 start-page: 431 year: 2012 end-page: 450 article-title: Plant defense against herbivores: chemical aspects publication-title: Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. – volume: 365 start-page: 2163 year: 2010 end-page: 2176 article-title: Global positioning system and associated technologies in animal behaviour and ecological research publication-title: Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B – volume: 5 start-page: e10403 year: 2010 article-title: Familiarity breeds contempt: kangaroos persistently avoid areas with experimentally deployed dingo scents publication-title: PLoS ONE – volume: 74 start-page: 945 year: 2010 end-page: 953 article-title: Habitat selection by prairie dogs in a disturbed landscape at the edge of their geographic range publication-title: J. Wildl. Mgmt. – volume: 1 start-page: 258 year: 2012 end-page: 283 – volume: 7 start-page: e31818 year: 2012 article-title: Physiological stress and refuge behavior by African elephants publication-title: PLoS ONE – volume: 17 start-page: 1538 year: 2003 end-page: 1547 article-title: Wolf depredation trends and the use of fladry barriers to protect livestock in western North America publication-title: Conserv. Biol. – volume: 15 start-page: 82 year: 2009 end-page: 87 article-title: Bold, shy, and persistent: variable coyote response to light and sound stimuli publication-title: App. Anim. Behav. Sci. – volume: 169 start-page: 66 year: 2013 end-page: 73 article-title: Foraging response of and to specialized and generalized predator scents publication-title: Am. Midl. Nat. – ident: e_1_2_7_44_1 doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199568994.001.0001 – ident: e_1_2_7_32_1 doi: 10.1007/s10886-009-9721-6 – ident: e_1_2_7_28_1 doi: 10.3957/056.042.0207 – ident: e_1_2_7_45_1 doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103854 – ident: e_1_2_7_19_1 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-0902-1_15 – ident: e_1_2_7_65_1 doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2010.10.005 – ident: e_1_2_7_66_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.07.005 – ident: e_1_2_7_31_1 doi: 10.1564/21aug09 – ident: e_1_2_7_54_1 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052813 – ident: e_1_2_7_69_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.041 – ident: e_1_2_7_64_1 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0090 – ident: e_1_2_7_5_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_16_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_60_1 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-0902-1_6 – ident: e_1_2_7_4_1 doi: 10.2193/2008-503 – ident: e_1_2_7_26_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.09.022 – ident: e_1_2_7_14_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00182.x – ident: e_1_2_7_42_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.12.029 – ident: e_1_2_7_10_1 doi: 10.1177/0278364906065375 – ident: e_1_2_7_52_1 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010403 – ident: e_1_2_7_7_1 doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-8-93 – ident: e_1_2_7_57_1 doi: 10.1002/wsb.93 – ident: e_1_2_7_35_1 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017983 – ident: e_1_2_7_51_1 doi: 10.1017/S0030605306000822 – ident: e_1_2_7_6_1 doi: 10.1353/book.336 – ident: e_1_2_7_15_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.09.024 – volume: 25 start-page: 20 year: 2008 ident: e_1_2_7_37_1 article-title: Out of Africa: lessons from park management in South Africa publication-title: George Wright Forum – ident: e_1_2_7_38_1 doi: 10.1525/bio.2010.60.2.9 – ident: e_1_2_7_48_1 doi: 10.1890/070003 – ident: e_1_2_7_55_1 doi: 10.1002/jwmg.327 – ident: e_1_2_7_59_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00062.x – ident: e_1_2_7_8_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01291.x – ident: e_1_2_7_61_1 doi: 10.1002/wsb.142 – volume: 20 start-page: 223 year: 2002 ident: e_1_2_7_9_1 article-title: Non‐lethal radio activated guard for deterring wolf depredation in Idaho: summary and call for research publication-title: Vertebr. Pest Conf. – ident: e_1_2_7_36_1 doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.03.010 – ident: e_1_2_7_40_1 doi: 10.3957/056.040.0107 – ident: e_1_2_7_12_1 doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12039 – ident: e_1_2_7_47_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00063.x – ident: e_1_2_7_68_1 doi: 10.1071/WR10021 – ident: e_1_2_7_22_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_46_1 doi: 10.2193/2008-266 – volume: 20 start-page: 15 year: 1995 ident: e_1_2_7_49_1 article-title: Evidence for the effectiveness of an oleo‐resin capsicum against wild elephants in Zimbabwe publication-title: Pachyderm doi: 10.69649/pachyderm.v20i1.827 – ident: e_1_2_7_62_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1749-7345.2002.tb00492.x – ident: e_1_2_7_24_1 doi: 10.1002/wsb.234 – ident: e_1_2_7_39_1 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-0902-1_12 – ident: e_1_2_7_11_1 doi: 10.2174/1874453201205010082 – ident: e_1_2_7_58_1 doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2006)056[0253:TFTEWN]2.0.CO;2 – ident: e_1_2_7_3_1 doi: 10.1890/100103 – ident: e_1_2_7_63_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_53_1 doi: 10.1126/science.334.6059.1042 – volume: 2 start-page: 1 year: 2008 ident: e_1_2_7_34_1 article-title: The culture of the fence: artifacts and meanings publication-title: Counterblast – J. Cult. Comm. – ident: e_1_2_7_41_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.08.008 – ident: e_1_2_7_30_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02185.x – volume: 5 start-page: 106 year: 2011 ident: e_1_2_7_20_1 article-title: Good fences make good neighbors: implementation of electric fencing for establishing effective livestock‐protection dogs publication-title: Hum.‐Wildl. Int. – ident: e_1_2_7_13_1 doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.06.013 – ident: e_1_2_7_33_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2028.2011.01275.x – ident: e_1_2_7_25_1 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-0902-1_2 – ident: e_1_2_7_50_1 doi: 10.1674/0003-0031-169.1.66 – ident: e_1_2_7_21_1 doi: 10.1017/S0030605311001104 – ident: e_1_2_7_27_1 doi: 10.1017/S0030605307001767 – ident: e_1_2_7_67_1 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046636 – ident: e_1_2_7_29_1 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031818 – ident: e_1_2_7_18_1 doi: 10.3161/000164511X625892 – ident: e_1_2_7_17_1 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103317108 – ident: e_1_2_7_56_1 doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.12.006 – start-page: 258 volume-title: The wildlife techniques manual year: 2012 ident: e_1_2_7_43_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_2_1 doi: 10.1071/RJ06036 – ident: e_1_2_7_23_1 doi: 10.2193/2007-066
SSID	ssj0012831
Score	2.3078263
SecondaryResourceType	review_article
Snippet	Fences can both enhance and detract from the conservation of wildlife, and many detrimental impacts are associated with creating physical barriers. By...
SourceID	proquest crossref wiley istex
SourceType	Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher
StartPage	187
SubjectTerms	Barriers biological fencing birds Fences monitoring proximity-based sensors radio-activated guards real-time sensory deterrent virtual management wildlife Wildlife conservation wildlife management
Title	Good virtual fences make good neighbors: opportunities for conservation
URI	https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-RTPRF81M-N/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Facv.12082 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1527464208 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1534821434 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1663527020
Volume	17
WOSCitedRecordID	wos000337525600001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText	1
inHoldings	1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights	– providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library Full Collection 2020 customDbUrl: eissn: 1469-1795 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0012831 issn: 1367-9430 databaseCode: DRFUL dateStart: 19980101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LT9wwEB7BbpG4lFdRtzxkEKq4pErWdh7tCVF2e4AVWm2Bm-X4gRAlWe1L8O_xeLMRSC1C6i2KvyjJ2JP5Ys98BjiSmreT0KggUokKGNMsyJJMBpmhGXchIWTKFwqfJ71eenOTXS7Bj0UtzFwfop5wQ8_w32t0cJmPXzi5VLNvUdtFsGVouttR3oDmz37n93m9iOAiZ1V2lQSoMl4JC2EiT33xq3DURMs-vuKaLxmrDzmdtf962HX4WDFNcjIfGhuwZIpNWDnzKtVPW9DtlqUms7sRFpAQ69OpyYO8N-QWGwqcMnXjY_ydlEPk6NPCa68SR3KJwhTsajL3Eww6Z4PTX0G1q0KgGJZIpamxOpZtqmOruYwlpVZHJjKUh9TyTBvOVBwy5k4pal08j00e5lwqB-Mx3YZGURbmMxDUFXB8UMuU5yyxMstQbtBIk8s0Zta24HhhW6EqxXHc-OKPWPx5OLMIb5YWHNbQ4Vxm42-gr76DaoQc3WNeWsLFda8r-oPLfieNLkSvBbuLHhSVS44F7t_LYswmaMFB3eycCVdIZGHKKWJQ68dRSPYGBjkaVvGF7v18n__7icXJ6ZU_-PJ-6A6sOlLG5ulou9CYjKZmDz6o2eRuPNqvxvgzQv3--Q
linkProvider	Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3da9swED-6pmN9Wdt9sHTdqpYy9uJhx5I_xl5Km6SliQkh2_ImZH2M0M0uSRPa_346xTENbGPQN2OdQT7d-X4-3f0EcCIUa8W-ll4gY-lRqqiXxqnwUh2mzIYEn0rXKNyLsywZj9PBBnxZ9cIs-SHqhBt6hvteo4NjQvqBlwu5-BS0bAh7Ag1qzcjad-N82Pnaq3cRbOis-q5iD2nGK2YhrOSpH16LRw1U7d0a2HwIWV3M6ew8bra78LzCmuR0aRx7sKGLF_C07Xiq719Ct1uWiiwmU2whIcYVVJNf4lqTHzhQYNLUWsjsMylvEKXPC8e-SizMJRKLsKt07isYddqjswuvOlfBkxSbpJJEGxWJVqgio5iIRBgaFehAh8wPDUuVZlRGPqX2lgyNjeiRzv2cCWnFWBS-hs2iLPQbIMgsYBGhEgnLaWxEmiLhoBY6F0lEjWnCx5Vyuaw4x_Hoi5989e9h1cKdWppwXIveLIk2_iT0wa1QLSGm11iZFjP-Pevy4Wgw7CRBn2dNOFgtIa-ccsbxBF8aYT1BE47qYetOuEciCl3OUQbZfiyIpP-QQZSGfXy-fT-36H-fMT89--Yu9v9f9BCeXYz6Pd67zK7ewraFaHRZnHYAm7fTuX4HW3JxO5lN31cG_xuEHQL4
linkToPdf	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3dT9swED9BOyZeGINNdLBhJjTxEpQ0dj6mvSAg3UQXVVUHfbNcf0wISKqWVtt_P5-bRiCNCWlvUXyRnLMv98v57ncAh0Kxduxr6QUylh6linppnAov1WHKrEvwqXSFwt04z5PhMO2twJdlLcyCH6IOuKFluO81GrgeK_PAyoWcHwdt68JWoUmxiUwDmmf97Ee3PkWwrrOqu4o9pBmvmIUwk6d--JE_aqJqfz0Cmw8hq_M52av_m-0mbFRYk5wsNsdrWNHFFqydO57q39vQ6ZSlIvPrCZaQEOMSqsmduNHkJw4UGDS1O2T6mZRjROmzwrGvEgtzicQk7Cqc-wYG2fng9KtX9VXwJMUiqSTRRkWiHarIKCYiEYZGBTrQIfNDw1KlGZWRT6m9JUNjPXqkR_6ICWnFWBS-hUZRFnoHCDILWESoRMJGNDYiTZFwUAs9EklEjWnB0VK5XFac49j64pYv_z2sWrhTSws-1qLjBdHG34Q-uRWqJcTkBjPTYsav8g7vD3r9LAm-87wFe8sl5JVRTjl28KUR5hO04KAetuaEZySi0OUMZZDtx4JI-g8ZRGlYx-fb93OL_vSM-cnppbt493zRfXjZO8t491t-sQvrFqHRRW7aHjTuJzP9Hl7I-f31dPKh2u9_AAsGAnM
openUrl	ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Good+virtual+fences+make+good+neighbors%3A+opportunities+for+conservation&rft.jtitle=Animal+conservation&rft.au=Jachowski%2C+D.+S.&rft.au=Slotow%2C+R.&rft.au=Millspaugh%2C+J.+J.&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.pub=Blackwell+Publishing+Ltd&rft.issn=1367-9430&rft.eissn=1469-1795&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=187&rft.epage=196&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Facv.12082&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=ark_67375_WNG_RTPRF81M_N
thumbnail_l	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1367-9430&client=summon
thumbnail_m	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1367-9430&client=summon
thumbnail_s	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1367-9430&client=summon