Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Food and Drug Administration Pilot Compendium: Meeting Today’s Standards for Patient Engagement in Development?

In 2016, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a Pilot Clinical Outcome Assessment Compendium (COA Compendium) intended to foster patient-focused drug development (PFDD). However, it is unclear whether patient perspectives were solicited during development or validation of the included pat...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Value in health Vol. 21; no. 8; pp. 967 - 972
Main Authors:	Oehrlein, Elisabeth M., Perfetto, Eleanor M., Love, T. Rose, Chung, Yujin, Ghafoori, Parima
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	United States Elsevier Inc 01.08.2018 Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects:	Clinical assessment Clinical Outcome Assessment (COA) Clinical outcomes Clinical research Clinical standards Clinical trials Cognitive ability Cognitive interviews Drug development Drugs Elicitation FDA approval Food Identification Interviews Management Measure Development Patient Engagement [Method] Patient handling Patient-focused drug development (PFDD) Patients Pedigree Quantitative psychology Transparency Validity Clinical Outcome Assessment (COA) Patient-focused drug development (PFDD) Patient Engagement [Method] Measure Development
ISSN:	1098-3015, 1524-4733, 1524-4733
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Abstract	In 2016, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a Pilot Clinical Outcome Assessment Compendium (COA Compendium) intended to foster patient-focused drug development (PFDD). However, it is unclear whether patient perspectives were solicited during development or validation of the included patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. To examine the pedigree of a sample of measures included in the COA Compendium. PROs included in chapters 1 or 2 of the COA Compendium were extracted and three reviewers independently searched PubMed and Google to identify information on measure pedigree. Data on method and stage of measure development where patient engagement took place were documented. Among the 26 evaluated PRO measures, we were unable to identify information on development or validation on nearly half the sample (n = 12). Among the remaining 14 measures, 5 did not include any evidence of patient engagement; 2 engaged patients during concept elicitation only; 1 engaged patients during psychometric validation only; and 6 engaged patients during both concept elicitation and cognitive interviewing. Measures either previously qualified or submitted for qualification were more likely to include patient engagement. For the FDA Pilot COA Compendium to fulfill its purpose of fostering PFDD, it needs fine-tuning to reflect today’s standards, improving transparency and facilitating clear identification of included measures so that the level of patient engagement, among other factors, can be properly assessed. Suggested improvements include identifying clinical trials that correspond to the COA Compendium’s use in drug development; more clearly identifying which measure is referred to; and including only those measures that already qualified or undergoing qualification.
AbstractList	Background In 2016, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a Pilot Clinical Outcome Assessment Compendium (COA Compendium) intended to foster patient-focused drug development (PFDD). However, it is unclear whether patient perspectives were solicited during development or validation of the included patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. Objective To examine the pedigree of a sample of measures included in the COA Compendium. Methods PROs included in chapters 1 or 2 of the COA Compendium were extracted and three reviewers independently searched PubMed and Google to identify information on measure pedigree. Data on method and stage of measure development where patient engagement took place were documented. Results Among the 26 evaluated PRO measures, we were unable to identify information on development or validation on nearly half the sample (n = 12). Among the remaining 14 measures, 5 did not include any evidence of patient engagement; 2 engaged patients during concept elicitation only; 1 engaged patients during psychometric validation only; and 6 engaged patients during both concept elicitation and cognitive interviewing. Measures either previously qualified or submitted for qualification were more likely to include patient engagement. Conclusions For the FDA Pilot COA Compendium to fulfill its purpose of fostering PFDD, it needs fine-tuning to reflect today’s standards, improving transparency and facilitating clear identification of included measures so that the level of patient engagement, among other factors, can be properly assessed. Suggested improvements include identifying clinical trials that correspond to the COA Compendium’s use in drug development; more clearly identifying which measure is referred to; and including only those measures that already qualified or undergoing qualification. In 2016, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a Pilot Clinical Outcome Assessment Compendium (COA Compendium) intended to foster patient-focused drug development (PFDD). However, it is unclear whether patient perspectives were solicited during development or validation of the included patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures.BACKGROUNDIn 2016, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a Pilot Clinical Outcome Assessment Compendium (COA Compendium) intended to foster patient-focused drug development (PFDD). However, it is unclear whether patient perspectives were solicited during development or validation of the included patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures.To examine the pedigree of a sample of measures included in the COA Compendium.OBJECTIVETo examine the pedigree of a sample of measures included in the COA Compendium.PROs included in chapters 1 or 2 of the COA Compendium were extracted and three reviewers independently searched PubMed and Google to identify information on measure pedigree. Data on method and stage of measure development where patient engagement took place were documented.METHODSPROs included in chapters 1 or 2 of the COA Compendium were extracted and three reviewers independently searched PubMed and Google to identify information on measure pedigree. Data on method and stage of measure development where patient engagement took place were documented.Among the 26 evaluated PRO measures, we were unable to identify information on development or validation on nearly half the sample (n = 12). Among the remaining 14 measures, 5 did not include any evidence of patient engagement; 2 engaged patients during concept elicitation only; 1 engaged patients during psychometric validation only; and 6 engaged patients during both concept elicitation and cognitive interviewing. Measures either previously qualified or submitted for qualification were more likely to include patient engagement.RESULTSAmong the 26 evaluated PRO measures, we were unable to identify information on development or validation on nearly half the sample (n = 12). Among the remaining 14 measures, 5 did not include any evidence of patient engagement; 2 engaged patients during concept elicitation only; 1 engaged patients during psychometric validation only; and 6 engaged patients during both concept elicitation and cognitive interviewing. Measures either previously qualified or submitted for qualification were more likely to include patient engagement.For the FDA Pilot COA Compendium to fulfill its purpose of fostering PFDD, it needs fine-tuning to reflect today's standards, improving transparency and facilitating clear identification of included measures so that the level of patient engagement, among other factors, can be properly assessed. Suggested improvements include identifying clinical trials that correspond to the COA Compendium's use in drug development; more clearly identifying which measure is referred to; and including only those measures that already qualified or undergoing qualification.CONCLUSIONSFor the FDA Pilot COA Compendium to fulfill its purpose of fostering PFDD, it needs fine-tuning to reflect today's standards, improving transparency and facilitating clear identification of included measures so that the level of patient engagement, among other factors, can be properly assessed. Suggested improvements include identifying clinical trials that correspond to the COA Compendium's use in drug development; more clearly identifying which measure is referred to; and including only those measures that already qualified or undergoing qualification. In 2016, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a Pilot Clinical Outcome Assessment Compendium (COA Compendium) intended to foster patient-focused drug development (PFDD). However, it is unclear whether patient perspectives were solicited during development or validation of the included patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. To examine the pedigree of a sample of measures included in the COA Compendium. PROs included in chapters 1 or 2 of the COA Compendium were extracted and three reviewers independently searched PubMed and Google to identify information on measure pedigree. Data on method and stage of measure development where patient engagement took place were documented. Among the 26 evaluated PRO measures, we were unable to identify information on development or validation on nearly half the sample (n = 12). Among the remaining 14 measures, 5 did not include any evidence of patient engagement; 2 engaged patients during concept elicitation only; 1 engaged patients during psychometric validation only; and 6 engaged patients during both concept elicitation and cognitive interviewing. Measures either previously qualified or submitted for qualification were more likely to include patient engagement. For the FDA Pilot COA Compendium to fulfill its purpose of fostering PFDD, it needs fine-tuning to reflect today’s standards, improving transparency and facilitating clear identification of included measures so that the level of patient engagement, among other factors, can be properly assessed. Suggested improvements include identifying clinical trials that correspond to the COA Compendium’s use in drug development; more clearly identifying which measure is referred to; and including only those measures that already qualified or undergoing qualification.
Author	Perfetto, Eleanor M. Love, T. Rose Ghafoori, Parima Chung, Yujin Oehrlein, Elisabeth M.
Author_xml	– sequence: 1 givenname: Elisabeth M. surname: Oehrlein fullname: Oehrlein, Elisabeth M. email: eoehrlein@umaryland.edu organization: Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: Eleanor M. surname: Perfetto fullname: Perfetto, Eleanor M. organization: Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA – sequence: 3 givenname: T. Rose surname: Love fullname: Love, T. Rose organization: Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA – sequence: 4 givenname: Yujin surname: Chung fullname: Chung, Yujin organization: University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA – sequence: 5 givenname: Parima surname: Ghafoori fullname: Ghafoori, Parima organization: University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA
BackLink	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30098675$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark	eNqFkc9u1DAQxiNURP_AC3BAlrhwyTKO48SpkKpq2wJSUSsoZ8vrTBYvib3Yzkp74zXg8XgSHHZ76aGcZkb-fjPW9x1nB9ZZzLKXFGYUaPV2NVttVD8rgIoZ0BlA-SQ7orwo87Jm7CD10IicAeWH2XEIKwCoWMGfZYcM0ktV86Ps962KBm3MP-Pa-YgtuRmjdgOST6jC6DEQY0n8huTKuZYo25ILPy7JeTsYa0L0CXeW3JreRTJ3wxpta8bhNOEYjV2SO9eq7Z-fvwL5EhOtfBtI5zzZ3yWXdqmWOExtOnSBG-zdehrPnmdPO9UHfLGvJ9nXq8u7-Yf8-ub9x_n5da5LxmNesqauOVWUKUa7qq5x0elOgxa6qKDkoJUAtQDNFwtRVaISCwq86Yq2oIWuBTvJ3uz2rr37MWKIcjBBY98ri24MsgBRNw1r-CR9_UC6cqO36XeyoCBExTmDpHq1V42LAVu59mZQfivvXU8CsRNo70Lw2Elt4j8jk5-mlxTkFLBcySlgOQUsgcoUcEKLB-j99kehdzsIk40bg14GnczX2BqPOsrWmcfx0we47lP4WvXfcfs_-C-5BtQp
CitedBy_id	crossref_primary_10_1039_D3FO00363A crossref_primary_10_1007_s40271_020_00442_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11136_022_03289_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pec_2022_01_008 crossref_primary_10_1093_pm_pnad125 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40271_022_00583_x crossref_primary_10_3233_JPD_212860 crossref_primary_10_1177_26345161231198622
Cites_doi	10.1016/j.jchf.2016.04.010 10.1111/j.1365-2869.1994.tb00114.x 10.1007/s11882-003-0100-z 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00531-3 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00272.x 10.1007/s40271-016-0183-y 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00603.x 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000273 10.1007/s40271-015-0159-3 10.1016/j.jvsv.2015.03.003 10.1016/j.jval.2017.05.015 10.1186/1477-7525-8-89 10.1056/NEJMp1110652 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.09.005 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.02.004 10.1177/0268355515595193 10.1001/archopht.1990.01070030090035 10.1258/phleb.2008.008018 10.1111/apt.13703 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.1897 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.013 10.1016/j.jval.2012.01.010 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.014
ContentType	Journal Article
Copyright	2018 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research Copyright © 2018 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Aug 2018
Copyright_xml	– notice: 2018 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research – notice: Copyright © 2018 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. – notice: Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Aug 2018
DBID	6I. AAFTH AAYXX CITATION NPM 7QJ 7X8
DOI	10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004
DatabaseName	ScienceDirect Open Access Titles Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access CrossRef PubMed Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle	CrossRef PubMed Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList	Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) MEDLINE - Academic PubMed
Database_xml	– sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod	fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline	Medicine Pharmacy, Therapeutics, & Pharmacology
EISSN	1524-4733
EndPage	972
ExternalDocumentID	30098675 10_1016_j_jval_2018_01_004 S1098301518301840
Genre	Journal Article
GroupedDBID	--- --K --M .1- .3N .FO .GA .Y3 .~1 0R~ 10A 123 1OC 1P~ 1~. 29Q 31~ 36B 4.4 44B 457 4G. 51W 51X 52N 52P 52R 52S 52X 53G 5LA 5VS 66C 6PF 7-5 7PT 8-1 8P~ 8UM AAEDT AAEDW AAFJI AAFWJ AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAMMB AAOAW AAPFB AAQFI AAQXK AATTM AAWTL AAXKI AAXUO AAYWO ABBQC ABCQN ABDBF ABEML ABIVO ABJNI ABMAC ABMMH ABMZM ABWVN ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFS ACHQT ACIEU ACLOT ACPRK ACRLP ACRPL ACUHS ACVFH ACXQS ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADFHU ADMUD ADNMO ADVLN AEBSH AEFGJ AEIPS AEKER AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AEXQZ AEYQN AFBPY AFEBI AFJKZ AFPUW AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AFZJQ AGHFR AGQPQ AGTHC AGUBO AGXDD AGYEJ AIDQK AIDYY AIEXJ AIGII AIIAU AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AJAOE AJRQY AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU ANZVX AOMHK APXCP ASPBG AVARZ AVWKF AXJTR AXLSJ AZFZN BAWUL BFHJK BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV BY8 CAG CO8 COF CS3 DCZOG DIK DU5 EAD EAP EBS EFJIC EFKBS EFLBG EJD EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN GBLVA HF~ HVGLF HZI HZ~ IHE IXB KOM LH4 M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OIG OK1 OVD P-8 P-9 P2P PC. PQQKQ PRBVW Q38 QB0 R2- ROL SDF SEL SES SPCBC SSB SSF SSH SSO SSZ SV3 T5K TEORI TUS W99 WIN WYUIH XG1 YFH Z5R ~G- ~HD 6I. AACTN AAFTH AAHHS AAIAV ABLVK ABVKL ABYKQ ACCFJ AEEZP AEQDE AFCTW AFKWA AIWBW AJBDE AJBFU AJOXV AKYCK AMFUW IXIXF LCYCR NCXOZ RIG SUPJJ AAYXX ALUQN CITATION O8X 0SF NPM 7QJ 7X8
ID	FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-4397751a13a31f677ebfcfc0c8c260450ca80ab0c5bb866868b1059f2d212c783
ISICitedReferencesCount	8
ISICitedReferencesURI	http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000441071700010&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN	1098-3015 1524-4733
IngestDate	Wed Oct 01 13:47:30 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 22 13:40:47 EST 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:44:08 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 06:10:17 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 21:40:34 EST 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:27:46 EST 2024 Tue Oct 14 19:29:32 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess	true
IsOpenAccess	true
IsPeerReviewed	true
IsScholarly	true
Issue	8
Keywords	Clinical Outcome Assessment (COA) Patient-focused drug development (PFDD) Patient Engagement [Method] Measure Development
Language	English
License	http://www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0 Copyright © 2018 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel	OpenURL
MergedId	FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c435t-4397751a13a31f677ebfcfc0c8c260450ca80ab0c5bb866868b1059f2d212c783
Notes	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23
OpenAccessLink	https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S1098301518301840
PMID	30098675
PQID	2108865530
PQPubID	105593
PageCount	6
ParticipantIDs	proquest_miscellaneous_2087993958 proquest_journals_2108865530 pubmed_primary_30098675 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_jval_2018_01_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jval_2018_01_004 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_jval_2018_01_004 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_jval_2018_01_004
PublicationCentury	2000
PublicationDate	August 2018 2018-08-00 20180801
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD	2018-08-01
PublicationDate_xml	– month: 08 year: 2018 text: August 2018
PublicationDecade	2010
PublicationPlace	United States
PublicationPlace_xml	– name: United States – name: Lawrenceville
PublicationTitle	Value in health
PublicationTitleAlternate	Value Health
PublicationYear	2018
Publisher	Elsevier Inc Elsevier Science Ltd
Publisher_xml	– name: Elsevier Inc – name: Elsevier Science Ltd
References	Kleinman, Talbot, SchÃler (bib17) 2014; 17 Canestaro, Edwards, Patrick (bib21) 2016; 44 Abelson, Chambers, Smith (bib29) 1990; 108 Benjamin, Vernon, Patrick (bib9) 2017; 20 Food and Drug Administration. Pilot Clinical Outcome Assessment Compendium (COA Compendium) Version 1. Available from Wright, Paty, Turner-Bowker, Bradbury (bib27) 2016; 9 (bib3) 2009 [Accessed July 19, 2017]. Paty, Turner-Bowker, Elash, Wright (bib26) 2016; 31 DeMuro, Clark, Mordin (bib31) 2012; 5 Perfetto, Burke, Oehrlein, Epstein (bib6) 2015; 53 Monk, Reynolds, Kupfer (bib33) 1994; 3 Todd, Wright (bib23) 2015; 3 Abelson, Loeffler (bib30) 2003; 3 Vasquez, Munschauer (bib25) 2008; 23 Paty, Elash, Turner-Bowker (bib28) 2017; 10 Newman, Feldman (bib20) 2011; 365 [Accessed June 1, 2017]. Frost, Reeve, Liepa (bib18) 2007; 10 Miles, Huberman, Saldana (bib8) 1994 [Accessed June 25, 2016]. International Society for Quality of Life Research. ISOQOL commentary on FDA Compendium. Available from Letter to FDA: Re: Docket No. FDA-2015-N-5106: Clinical Outcome Assessment Compendium. Available from Rothman, Burke, Erickson (bib12) 2009; 12 Patrick, Burke, Gwaltney (bib10) 2011; 14 Green, Porter, Bresnahan, Spertus (bib15) 2000; 35 Food and Drug Administration. Roadmap to patient-focused outcome measurement in clinical trials. Available from Psotka, von Maltzahn, Anatchkova (bib14) 2016; 4 Food and Drug Administration. Pilot Clinical Outcome Assessment Compendium (COA Compendium) Webinar (March 8, 2016). Available from Patrick, Burke, Gwaltney (bib11) 2011; 14 Dupont, Jiang, Belkind-Gerson (bib34) 2007; 5 (bib13) 2006 Food and Drug Administration. Clinical Outcome Assessment Qualification Program submissions. Available from [Accessed June 29, 2016]. (bib24) 2012 Rahman, Rizwan, Waycaster, Wall (bib32) 2007; 29 Food and Drug Administration. Enhancing the development and use of patient-reported outcomes in drug development: July 16, 2014 meeting summary. Available from Doward, Gnanasakthy, Baker (bib19) 2010; 8 Todd (10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib23) 2015; 3 Patrick (10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib11) 2011; 14 Rahman (10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib32) 2007; 29 DeMuro (10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib31) 2012; 5 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib22 Rothman (10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib12) 2009; 12 Vasquez (10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib25) 2008; 23 Dupont (10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib34) 2007; 5 Psotka (10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib14) 2016; 4 Miles (10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib8) 1994 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib7 Green (10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib15) 2000; 35 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib5 Paty (10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib26) 2016; 31 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib4 Kleinman (10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib17) 2014; 17 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib2 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib16 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib1 Newman (10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib20) 2011; 365 Wright (10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib27) 2016; 9 Patrick (10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib10) 2011; 14 Abelson (10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib30) 2003; 3 Benjamin (10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib9) 2017; 20 Frost (10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib18) 2007; 10 Perfetto (10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib6) 2015; 53 (10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib3) 2009 Canestaro (10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib21) 2016; 44 Monk (10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib33) 1994; 3 (10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib13) 2006 Doward (10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib19) 2010; 8 Abelson (10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib29) 1990; 108 Paty (10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib28) 2017; 10 (10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib24) 2012
References_xml	– volume: 108 start-page: 84 year: 1990 end-page: 88 ident: bib29 article-title: Conjunctival allergen challenge: a clinical approach to studying allergic conjunctivitis publication-title: Arch Ophthalmol – volume: 17 start-page: A569 year: 2014 ident: bib17 article-title: Cdad-Daysymsâ: a new patient-reported outcome tool for publication-title: Value Health – volume: 10 start-page: 51 year: 2017 end-page: 63 ident: bib28 article-title: Content validity for the VVSymQ(R) Instrument: a new patient-reported outcome measure for the assessment of varicose veins symptoms publication-title: Patient – volume: 14 start-page: 967 year: 2011 end-page: 977 ident: bib10 article-title: Content validity—establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: part 1—eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument publication-title: Value Health – volume: 10 start-page: S94 year: 2007 end-page: S105 ident: bib18 article-title: What is sufficient evidence for the reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measures? publication-title: Value Health – year: 2006 ident: bib13 article-title: Patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims publication-title: Draft guidance. – reference: Letter to FDA: Re: Docket No. FDA-2015-N-5106: Clinical Outcome Assessment Compendium. Available from: – volume: 12 start-page: 1075 year: 2009 end-page: 1083 ident: bib12 article-title: Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Evaluating and Documenting Content Validity for the Use of Existing Instruments and Their Modification PRO Task Force report publication-title: Value Health – volume: 29 start-page: 1950 year: 2007 end-page: 1956 ident: bib32 article-title: Pooled analysis of two clinical trials comparing the clinical outcomes of topical ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone otic suspension and polymyxin B/neomycin/hydrocortisone otic suspension for the treatment of acute otitis externa in adults and children publication-title: Clin Ther – volume: 31 start-page: 481 year: 2016 end-page: 488 ident: bib26 article-title: The VVSymQ(R) instrument: use of a new patient-reported outcome measure for assessment of varicose vein symptoms publication-title: Phlebology – volume: 8 start-page: 89 year: 2010 ident: bib19 article-title: Patient-reported outcomes: looking beyond the label claim publication-title: Health Qual Life Outcomes – reference: . [Accessed July 19, 2017]. – volume: 3 start-page: 111 year: 1994 end-page: 120 ident: bib33 article-title: The Pittsburgh Sleep Diary publication-title: J Sleep Res – volume: 53 start-page: 9 year: 2015 end-page: 17 ident: bib6 article-title: Patient-focused drug development: a new direction for collaboration publication-title: Med Care – volume: 365 start-page: 2447 year: 2011 end-page: 2449 ident: bib20 article-title: Copyright and open access at the bedside publication-title: N Engl J Med – volume: 35 start-page: 1245 year: 2000 end-page: 1255 ident: bib15 article-title: Development and evaluation of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire: a new health status measure for heart failure publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol – volume: 3 start-page: 258 year: 2015 end-page: 264 ident: bib23 article-title: Durability of treatment effect with polidocanol endovenous microfoam on varicose vein symptoms and appearance (VANISH-2) publication-title: J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord – volume: 44 start-page: 313 year: 2016 end-page: 331 ident: bib21 article-title: Systematic review: patient-reported outcome measures in coeliac disease for regulatory submissions publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther – reference: Food and Drug Administration. Pilot Clinical Outcome Assessment Compendium (COA Compendium) Webinar (March 8, 2016). Available from: – reference: Food and Drug Administration. Clinical Outcome Assessment Qualification Program submissions. Available from: – reference: Food and Drug Administration. Enhancing the development and use of patient-reported outcomes in drug development: July 16, 2014 meeting summary. Available from: – start-page: 24 year: 2012 end-page: 28 ident: bib24 article-title: Validation of new patient/clinician-reported outcome tool—capturing the visual impact of varicose veins – reference: . [Accessed June 29, 2016]. – reference: International Society for Quality of Life Research. ISOQOL commentary on FDA Compendium. Available from: – reference: . [Accessed June 1, 2017]. – volume: 5 start-page: 443 year: 2012 end-page: 448 ident: bib31 article-title: Reasons for rejection of patient-reported outcome label claims: a compilation based on a review of patient-reported outcome use among new molecular entities and biologic license applications, 2006–2010 publication-title: Value Health – year: 1994 ident: bib8 article-title: Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook – volume: 14 start-page: 978 year: 2011 end-page: 988 ident: bib11 article-title: Content validity—establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: part 2—assessing respondent understanding publication-title: Value Health – volume: 5 start-page: 451 year: 2007 end-page: 456 ident: bib34 article-title: Treatment of travelers’ diarrhea: randomized trial comparing rifaximin, rifaximin plus loperamide, and loperamide alone publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol – reference: . [Accessed June 25, 2016]. – volume: 20 start-page: 838 year: 2017 end-page: 855 ident: bib9 article-title: Patient-reported outcome and observer-reported outcome assessment in rare disease clinical trials: an ISPOR COA Emerging Good Practices Task Force Report publication-title: Value Health – volume: 23 start-page: 259 year: 2008 end-page: 275 ident: bib25 article-title: Venous Clinical Severity Score and quality-of-life assessment tools: application to vein practice publication-title: Phlebology – reference: Food and Drug Administration. Roadmap to patient-focused outcome measurement in clinical trials. Available from: – year: 2009 ident: bib3 publication-title: Guidance for Industry. Patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. – volume: 4 start-page: 791 year: 2016 end-page: 804 ident: bib14 article-title: Patient-reported outcomes in chronic heart failure: applicability for regulatory approval publication-title: JACC Heart Fail – volume: 3 start-page: 363 year: 2003 end-page: 368 ident: bib30 article-title: Conjunctival allergen challenge: models in the investigation of ocular allergy publication-title: Curr Allergy Asthma Rep – reference: Food and Drug Administration. Pilot Clinical Outcome Assessment Compendium (COA Compendium) Version 1. Available from: – volume: 9 start-page: 335 year: 2016 end-page: 348 ident: bib27 article-title: Psychometric evaluation of a new patient-reported outcome (PRO) symptom diary for varicose veins: VVSymQ(R) Instrument publication-title: Patient – ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib7 – volume: 4 start-page: 791 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib14 article-title: Patient-reported outcomes in chronic heart failure: applicability for regulatory approval publication-title: JACC Heart Fail doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.04.010 – volume: 3 start-page: 111 year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib33 article-title: The Pittsburgh Sleep Diary publication-title: J Sleep Res doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.1994.tb00114.x – ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib5 – volume: 3 start-page: 363 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib30 article-title: Conjunctival allergen challenge: models in the investigation of ocular allergy publication-title: Curr Allergy Asthma Rep doi: 10.1007/s11882-003-0100-z – year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib3 publication-title: Guidance for Industry. Patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. – volume: 35 start-page: 1245 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib15 article-title: Development and evaluation of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire: a new health status measure for heart failure publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00531-3 – ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib1 – volume: 10 start-page: S94 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib18 article-title: What is sufficient evidence for the reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measures? publication-title: Value Health doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00272.x – volume: 10 start-page: 51 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib28 article-title: Content validity for the VVSymQ(R) Instrument: a new patient-reported outcome measure for the assessment of varicose veins symptoms publication-title: Patient doi: 10.1007/s40271-016-0183-y – volume: 12 start-page: 1075 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib12 article-title: Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Evaluating and Documenting Content Validity for the Use of Existing Instruments and Their Modification PRO Task Force report publication-title: Value Health doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00603.x – volume: 53 start-page: 9 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib6 article-title: Patient-focused drug development: a new direction for collaboration publication-title: Med Care doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000273 – volume: 9 start-page: 335 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib27 article-title: Psychometric evaluation of a new patient-reported outcome (PRO) symptom diary for varicose veins: VVSymQ(R) Instrument publication-title: Patient doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0159-3 – volume: 3 start-page: 258 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib23 article-title: Durability of treatment effect with polidocanol endovenous microfoam on varicose vein symptoms and appearance (VANISH-2) publication-title: J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2015.03.003 – volume: 20 start-page: 838 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib9 article-title: Patient-reported outcome and observer-reported outcome assessment in rare disease clinical trials: an ISPOR COA Emerging Good Practices Task Force Report publication-title: Value Health doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.05.015 – volume: 8 start-page: 89 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib19 article-title: Patient-reported outcomes: looking beyond the label claim publication-title: Health Qual Life Outcomes doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-89 – ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib22 – volume: 365 start-page: 2447 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib20 article-title: Copyright and open access at the bedside publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1110652 – volume: 29 start-page: 1950 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib32 article-title: Pooled analysis of two clinical trials comparing the clinical outcomes of topical ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone otic suspension and polymyxin B/neomycin/hydrocortisone otic suspension for the treatment of acute otitis externa in adults and children publication-title: Clin Ther doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.09.005 – ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib4 – ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib2 – start-page: 24 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib24 – volume: 5 start-page: 451 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib34 article-title: Treatment of travelers’ diarrhea: randomized trial comparing rifaximin, rifaximin plus loperamide, and loperamide alone publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.02.004 – volume: 31 start-page: 481 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib26 article-title: The VVSymQ(R) instrument: use of a new patient-reported outcome measure for assessment of varicose vein symptoms publication-title: Phlebology doi: 10.1177/0268355515595193 – volume: 108 start-page: 84 year: 1990 ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib29 article-title: Conjunctival allergen challenge: a clinical approach to studying allergic conjunctivitis publication-title: Arch Ophthalmol doi: 10.1001/archopht.1990.01070030090035 – volume: 23 start-page: 259 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib25 article-title: Venous Clinical Severity Score and quality-of-life assessment tools: application to vein practice publication-title: Phlebology doi: 10.1258/phleb.2008.008018 – volume: 44 start-page: 313 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib21 article-title: Systematic review: patient-reported outcome measures in coeliac disease for regulatory submissions publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther doi: 10.1111/apt.13703 – year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib13 article-title: Patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims publication-title: Draft guidance. – volume: 17 start-page: A569 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib17 article-title: Cdad-Daysymsâ: a new patient-reported outcome tool for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea publication-title: Value Health doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.1897 – volume: 14 start-page: 978 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib11 article-title: Content validity—establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: part 2—assessing respondent understanding publication-title: Value Health doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.013 – ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib16 – year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib8 – volume: 5 start-page: 443 issue: 15 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib31 article-title: Reasons for rejection of patient-reported outcome label claims: a compilation based on a review of patient-reported outcome use among new molecular entities and biologic license applications, 2006–2010 publication-title: Value Health doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.01.010 – volume: 14 start-page: 967 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004_bib10 article-title: Content validity—establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: part 1—eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument publication-title: Value Health doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.014
SSID	ssj0006325
Score	2.2499778
Snippet	In 2016, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a Pilot Clinical Outcome Assessment Compendium (COA Compendium) intended to foster patient-focused... Background In 2016, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a Pilot Clinical Outcome Assessment Compendium (COA Compendium) intended to foster...
SourceID	proquest pubmed crossref elsevier
SourceType	Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher
StartPage	967
SubjectTerms	Clinical assessment Clinical Outcome Assessment (COA) Clinical outcomes Clinical research Clinical standards Clinical trials Cognitive ability Cognitive interviews Drug development Drugs Elicitation FDA approval Food Identification Interviews Management Measure Development Patient Engagement [Method] Patient handling Patient-focused drug development (PFDD) Patients Pedigree Quantitative psychology Transparency Validity
Title	Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Food and Drug Administration Pilot Compendium: Meeting Today’s Standards for Patient Engagement in Development?
URI	https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S1098301518301840 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.004 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30098675 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2108865530 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2087993958
Volume	21
WOSCitedRecordID	wos000441071700010&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText	1
inHoldings	1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights	– providerCode: PRVESC databaseName: ScienceDirect Freedom Collection - Elsevier customDbUrl: eissn: 1524-4733 dateEnd: 20181231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0006325 issn: 1098-3015 databaseCode: AIEXJ dateStart: 19980501 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com providerName: Elsevier
link	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3bbtNAEF2lLUK8IChQAqVaJNSX1JU3vuyaF1ShVIBIiURA4cmy12uayHKq2I7aN34D_opf4EuYvdhOg1ouEnmwItubiTUns7ObM2cQekZSN3ICl1iOiD3LZXFqMTf1LF8kfS5oQDwaqWYT9OSETSbBqNP5XtfCLDOa5-z8PDj7r66Gc-BsWTr7F-5uPhROwHtwOhzB7XD8I8ePtFKqpVNryCffVSXYgZ-v3g4samrjsRQ0VkzkRfV5TUW3N5pm81JFC5En00pt5w-Fqo_W1JuaJREUMmFV2xFK2qFn7EulQ0OskQZXyElrXMKPUVYp5RJdktns-orTRWY6cQ4yqQQsytPe8LCN5YtUlKoJFFwXUQ6m26tv50stJ3zYk70jWxKDiW2fqpmRHDc7HoQ1fDuzDVeX4lxiihIpjArRylsN7br42kCYrcTpQPcAMVN-oLsH_TKb6I2N2eEMUCBZgEwpvOp2yWsq3e-lfWmeyCOsmjfQVp96AQTaraPXg8mbJj3wHdUJuPm-ppJLkw7XLV2VLV21GlJZ0fgOum2WM_hIw_Au6oh8G90cGsLGNtofaWn0iwM8biv9igO8j0etaPrFPfRtHbbYwBbXsMXTHANssYQtBsBhCVt8GbZYwRa3sH2ODWixAu2PL18L3MAVA1yxsYtbuEpDK3B9cR99OB6MX76yTN8Qi0PyX1oyx6YeiYgTOST1KRVxylNuc8Zh9e56No-YHcU29-KY-T7zWSxXGWk_gTyOU-Y8QJv5PBcPEaaR7ySRcALmQR7M3SBxhQC3Cnj1WcK7iNT-CbkR1Ze9XbKwZk_OQunTUPo0tEkIPu2iXjPmTEvKXHu3U7s9rIulYXoPAaPXjvKaUSaV1inyb8ft1sgKTUwrwj6BVMSX_cW66GlzGaYh-d9ilIt5BffYjMJSJ_BYF-1oRDYP50jRYp96j_7pUR6jW20Q2EWb5aIST9ANviynxWIPbdAJ2zO_sZ97IBCC
linkProvider	Elsevier
openUrl	ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient-Reported+Outcome+Measures+in+the+Food+and+Drug+Administration+Pilot+Compendium%3A+Meeting+Today%E2%80%99s+Standards+for+Patient+Engagement+in+Development%3F&rft.jtitle=Value+in+health&rft.au=Oehrlein%2C+Elisabeth+M.&rft.au=Perfetto%2C+Eleanor+M.&rft.au=Love%2C+T.+Rose&rft.au=Chung%2C+Yujin&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Inc&rft.issn=1098-3015&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=967&rft.epage=972&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.jval.2018.01.004&rft.externalDocID=S1098301518301840
thumbnail_l	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1098-3015&client=summon
thumbnail_m	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1098-3015&client=summon
thumbnail_s	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1098-3015&client=summon