Decision process in MCDM with large number of criteria and heterogeneous risk preferences

A new decision process is proposed to address the challenge that a large number criteria in the multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problem and the decision makers with heterogeneous risk preferences. First, from the perspective of objective data, the effective criteria are extracted based on the...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Operations Research Perspectives Ročník 4; s. 106 - 112
Hlavní autoři: Liu, Jian, Zhao, Hong-Kuan, Li, Zhao-Bin, Liu, Si-Feng
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Amsterdam Elsevier 2017
Témata:
ISSN:2214-7160, 2214-7160
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:A new decision process is proposed to address the challenge that a large number criteria in the multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problem and the decision makers with heterogeneous risk preferences. First, from the perspective of objective data, the effective criteria are extracted based on the similarity relations between criterion values and the criteria are weighted, respectively. Second, the corresponding types of theoretic model of risk preferences expectations will be built, based on the possibility and similarity between criterion values to solve the problem for different interval numbers with the same expectation. Then, the risk preferences (Risk-seeking, risk-neutral and risk-aversion) will be embedded in the decision process. Later, the optimal decision object is selected according to the risk preferences of decision makers based on the corresponding theoretic model. Finally, a new algorithm of information aggregation model is proposed based on fairness maximization of decision results for the group decision, considering the coexistence of decision makers with heterogeneous risk preferences. The scientific rationality verification of this new method is given through the analysis of real case.
ISSN:2214-7160
2214-7160
DOI:10.1016/j.orp.2017.07.001