Reference frames in visual selection

We review neuropsychological evidence for visual selection operating in different reference frames. There is general agreement that there may be a separation of coding space near to and farther from the body, and that deficits in selecting stimuli within each form of spatial representation may be im...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Vol. 1296; no. 1; pp. 75 - 87
Main Authors:	Humphreys, Glyn W., Gillebert, Celine R., Chechlacz, Magda, Riddoch, M. Jane
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.08.2013 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects:	attention Attention - physiology Coding Computation Computer Simulation Humans neglect Patients Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology Photic Stimulation reference frame Reference Standards Representations Separation Space Perception - physiology Stimuli Visual attention reference frame neglect
ISSN:	0077-8923, 1749-6632, 1749-6632
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Abstract	We review neuropsychological evidence for visual selection operating in different reference frames. There is general agreement that there may be a separation of coding space near to and farther from the body, and that deficits in selecting stimuli within each form of spatial representation may be impaired in patients with unilateral neglect. However, there remains a lack of consensus about whether all forms of spatial representation relate to the body or whether there are spatial representations based on reference frames ed from the body (allocentric and object‐centered spatial codes). Here we will review the evidence for spatial coding in these more ed reference frames (allocentric and object‐centered but also environmental) and argue for the psychological reality of (at least) allocentric spatial coding. We discuss computational accounts of how such codes may be created as objects are selected.
AbstractList	We review neuropsychological evidence for visual selection operating in different reference frames. There is general agreement that there may be a separation of coding space near to and farther from the body, and that deficits in selecting stimuli within each form of spatial representation may be impaired in patients with unilateral neglect. However, there remains a lack of consensus about whether all forms of spatial representation relate to the body or whether there are spatial representations based on reference frames abstracted from the body (allocentric and object-centered spatial codes). Here we will review the evidence for spatial coding in these more abstracted reference frames (allocentric and object-centered but also environmental) and argue for the psychological reality of (at least) allocentric spatial coding. We discuss computational accounts of how such codes may be created as objects are selected. We review neuropsychological evidence for visual selection operating in different reference frames. There is general agreement that there may be a separation of coding space near to and farther from the body, and that deficits in selecting stimuli within each form of spatial representation may be impaired in patients with unilateral neglect. However, there remains a lack of consensus about whether all forms of spatial representation relate to the body or whether there are spatial representations based on reference frames abstracted from the body (allocentric and object-centered spatial codes). Here we will review the evidence for spatial coding in these more abstracted reference frames (allocentric and object-centered but also environmental) and argue for the psychological reality of (at least) allocentric spatial coding. We discuss computational accounts of how such codes may be created as objects are selected. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] We review neuropsychological evidence for visual selection operating in different reference frames. There is general agreement that there may be a separation of coding space near to and farther from the body, and that deficits in selecting stimuli within each form of spatial representation may be impaired in patients with unilateral neglect. However, there remains a lack of consensus about whether all forms of spatial representation relate to the body or whether there are spatial representations based on reference frames abstracted from the body (allocentric and object-centered spatial codes). Here we will review the evidence for spatial coding in these more abstracted reference frames (allocentric and object-centered but also environmental) and argue for the psychological reality of (at least) allocentric spatial coding. We discuss computational accounts of how such codes may be created as objects are selected.We review neuropsychological evidence for visual selection operating in different reference frames. There is general agreement that there may be a separation of coding space near to and farther from the body, and that deficits in selecting stimuli within each form of spatial representation may be impaired in patients with unilateral neglect. However, there remains a lack of consensus about whether all forms of spatial representation relate to the body or whether there are spatial representations based on reference frames abstracted from the body (allocentric and object-centered spatial codes). Here we will review the evidence for spatial coding in these more abstracted reference frames (allocentric and object-centered but also environmental) and argue for the psychological reality of (at least) allocentric spatial coding. We discuss computational accounts of how such codes may be created as objects are selected. We review neuropsychological evidence for visual selection operating in different reference frames. There is general agreement that there may be a separation of coding space near to and farther from the body, and that deficits in selecting stimuli within each form of spatial representation may be impaired in patients with unilateral neglect. However, there remains a lack of consensus about whether all forms of spatial representation relate to the body or whether there are spatial representations based on reference frames ed from the body (allocentric and object‐centered spatial codes). Here we will review the evidence for spatial coding in these more ed reference frames (allocentric and object‐centered but also environmental) and argue for the psychological reality of (at least) allocentric spatial coding. We discuss computational accounts of how such codes may be created as objects are selected.
Author	Riddoch, M. Jane Humphreys, Glyn W. Gillebert, Celine R. Chechlacz, Magda
Author_xml	– sequence: 1 givenname: Glyn W. surname: Humphreys fullname: Humphreys, Glyn W. email: glyn.humphreys@psy.ox.ac.uk organization: Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom – sequence: 2 givenname: Celine R. surname: Gillebert fullname: Gillebert, Celine R. organization: Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom – sequence: 3 givenname: Magda surname: Chechlacz fullname: Chechlacz, Magda organization: Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom – sequence: 4 givenname: M. Jane surname: Riddoch fullname: Riddoch, M. Jane organization: Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
BackLink	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23991639$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark	eNqN0UtL7DAUB_Agio6PjR9ABnRxuVDNo3mcpYh6RVHwgbgKSXsK0U6rSavOt78dR12IiNmcze9_IOe_ShabtkFCNhndZcPba6Yu7TLOpVogI6ZzyJQSfJGMKNU6M8DFCllN6Z5Sxk2ul8kKFwBMCRiRnUusMGJT4LiKboJpHJrxc0i9q8cJayy60DbrZKlydcKN97lGbo4Orw_-ZWcXxycH-2dZkXOjstJrUxpd5mAYRSiAGeY9mKqioLnQYJRnUiPKAr0XXpgKfMnzXHtQHplYI3_mex9j-9Rj6uwkpALr2jXY9smyXIAWmgP8gnJQwjAhB7r9hd63fWyGjwwqF5JJ4DO19a56P8HSPsYwcXFqP041gL9zUMQ2pYjVJ2HUznqwsx7sWw8Dpl9wETo3u2UXXai_j7B55CXUOP1huT2_27_6yGTzTEgdvn5mXHywajiUtLfnx1YYenoqlbRG_AeEcaYM
CODEN	ANYAA9
CitedBy_id	crossref_primary_10_1080_09602011_2016_1202120 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_45505_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2015_10_031 crossref_primary_10_1111_nous_12207 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13414_025_03148_w crossref_primary_10_3758_s13421_022_01360_9 crossref_primary_10_1177_15459683211032977 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2016_08_002 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2015_00648 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_017_14910_y
Cites_doi	10.1038/nn1031 10.1037/0096-3445.123.2.161 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.03.031 10.1080/14640748508400922 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00088-7 10.1162/089892900562192 10.1080/02643299408251974 10.1080/02643299008253450 10.1162/jocn.1994.6.1.1 10.1080/02643299108253384 10.1097/00001756-199610020-00010 10.1016/0028-3932(94)90152-X 10.1080/713756777 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02044.x 10.1080/02643299508252000 10.1016/0028-3932(90)90060-2 10.1016/0028-3932(94)00068-9 10.1017/S0140525X00080018 10.1162/jocn_a_00005 10.1093/brain/awp305 10.1016/0028-3932(86)90053-9 10.1080/02643290903424329 10.1016/0028-3932(94)90065-5 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.07.192 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.075 10.1093/neucas/8.1.1 10.1080/00335558008248231 10.1093/brain/123.12.2531 10.1080/02643294.2010.519699 10.1162/jocn.2008.21160 10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.29 10.1037/a0023501 10.1212/WNL.37.7.1179 10.1038/350498a0 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.044
ContentType	Journal Article
Copyright	2013 New York Academy of Sciences. 2013 The New York Academy of Sciences
Copyright_xml	– notice: 2013 New York Academy of Sciences. – notice: 2013 The New York Academy of Sciences
DBID	BSCLL AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QG 7QL 7QP 7QR 7ST 7T5 7T7 7TK 7TM 7TO 7U7 7U9 8FD C1K FR3 H94 K9. M7N P64 RC3 SOI 7X8 7SP 7U5 L7M
DOI	10.1111/nyas.12256
DatabaseName	Istex CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Animal Behavior Abstracts Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Chemoreception Abstracts Environment Abstracts Immunology Abstracts Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Neurosciences Abstracts Nucleic Acids Abstracts Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts Toxicology Abstracts Virology and AIDS Abstracts Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Engineering Research Database AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Environment Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic Electronics & Communications Abstracts Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace
DatabaseTitle	CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Virology and AIDS Abstracts Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts Technology Research Database Toxicology Abstracts Nucleic Acids Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Neurosciences Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Genetics Abstracts Animal Behavior Abstracts Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Chemoreception Abstracts Immunology Abstracts Engineering Research Database Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Environment Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Electronics & Communications Abstracts
DatabaseTitleList	MEDLINE CrossRef Virology and AIDS Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts
Database_xml	– sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod	fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline	Sciences (General) Biology
EISSN	1749-6632
EndPage	87
ExternalDocumentID	3104507511 23991639 10_1111_nyas_12256 NYAS12256 ark_67375_WNG_380KK565_8
Genre	article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Review
GrantInformation_xml	– fundername: NIHR – fundername: Stroke Association – fundername: ERC funderid: 323883
GroupedDBID	--- --Z -~X .3N .55 .GA .GJ .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1CY 1OB 1OC 23M 31~ 33P 3O- 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5RE 5VS 66C 692 6J9 702 79B 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHQN AAMMB AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABDBF ABEML ABJNI ABLJU ABPVW ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCZN ACGFO ACGFS ACIWK ACPOU ACPRK ACRPL ACSCC ACUHS ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADXAS ADXHL ADZMN AEFGJ AEGXH AEIGN AEIMD AELAQ AENEX AEUYR AEYWJ AFBPY AFFNX AFFPM AFGKR AFRAH AFSWV AFWVQ AFZJQ AGHNM AGQPQ AGXDD AGYGG AHBTC AHDLI AHEFC AHMBA AI. AIAGR AIDQK AIDYY AIQQE AITYG AIURR AJXKR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ATUGU AUFTA AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BIYOS BMNLL BMXJE BNHUX BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 C45 CAG CO8 COF CS3 D-E D-F DC6 DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRSTM EBD EBS EJD EMOBN ESX F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FZ0 G-S G.N GODZA H.T H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZI HZ~ I-F IH2 IX1 J0M K48 L7B LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSTM MSFUL MSSTM MXFUL MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ NHB O66 O9- OHT OIG OK1 OVD P2P P2W P2X P4D PALCI PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K RAG RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 S10 SAMSI SJN SUPJJ SV3 TEORI TUS UB1 UPT V8K VH1 W8V W99 WBKPD WH7 WHWMO WIH WIK WOHZO WQJ WVDHM WXSBR X7M XG1 YBU YOC YSK ZGI ZKB ZXP ZZTAW ~02 ~IA ~KM ~WT AAYXX CITATION O8X AAHHS ACCFJ ADZOD AEEZP AEQDE AIWBW AJBDE CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QG 7QL 7QP 7QR 7ST 7T5 7T7 7TK 7TM 7TO 7U7 7U9 8FD C1K FR3 H94 K9. M7N P64 RC3 SOI 7X8 7SP 7U5 L7M
ID	FETCH-LOGICAL-c4286-db78d87d49810e9c9181bb98ff097237986b157ee5cebb3b38f9bd2447b96be13
IEDL.DBID	DRFUL
ISICitedReferencesCount	16
ISICitedReferencesURI	http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000324835300006&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN	0077-8923 1749-6632
IngestDate	Sun Nov 09 12:34:44 EST 2025 Fri Jul 11 11:20:32 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 14:27:40 EST 2025 Thu Apr 03 06:52:25 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 06:10:45 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 21:11:01 EST 2025 Sun Sep 21 06:23:22 EDT 2025 Sun Sep 21 06:22:00 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed	true
IsScholarly	true
Issue	1
Keywords	attention reference frame neglect
Language	English
License	http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor 2013 New York Academy of Sciences.
LinkModel	DirectLink
MergedId	FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4286-db78d87d49810e9c9181bb98ff097237986b157ee5cebb3b38f9bd2447b96be13
Notes	ERC - No. 323883 Stroke Association NIHR ark:/67375/WNG-380KK565-8 istex:0F7CC95CEBF982A2C018ED00BC7E0B28FE015DD5 ArticleID:NYAS12256 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1
PMID	23991639
PQID	1443515925
PQPubID	946344
PageCount	13
ParticipantIDs	proquest_miscellaneous_1439737299 proquest_miscellaneous_1429638135 proquest_journals_1443515925 pubmed_primary_23991639 crossref_primary_10_1111_nyas_12256 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_nyas_12256 wiley_primary_10_1111_nyas_12256_NYAS12256 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_380KK565_8
PublicationCentury	2000
PublicationDate	August 2013
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD	2013-08-01
PublicationDate_xml	– month: 08 year: 2013 text: August 2013
PublicationDecade	2010
PublicationPlace	United States
PublicationPlace_xml	– name: United States – name: New York
PublicationTitle	Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
PublicationTitleAlternate	Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci
PublicationYear	2013
Publisher	Blackwell Publishing Ltd Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml	– name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References	Caramazza, A. & A.E. Hillis. 1990. Levels of representation, co-ordinate frames, and unilateral neglect. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 7: 391-445. Iriki, A., M. Tanaka & Y. Iwamura. 1996. Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. Neuroreport 7: 2325-2330. Karnath, H.O., A. Mandler & S. Clavagnier. 2011. Object-based neglect varies with egocentric position. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23: 2983-2993. Bickerton, W.L., D. Samson, J. Williamson & G.W. Humphreys. 2011. Separating forms of neglect using the Apples test validation and functional prediction in chronic and acute stroke. Neuropsychology 25: 567-580. Calvanio, R., P.N. Petrone & D.N. Levine. 1987. Left visual spatial neglect is both environment-centered and body-centered. Neurology 37: 1179-1183. Wilson, K.D, M.G. Woldorff & G.R. Mangun. 2005. Control networks and hemispheric asymmetries in parietal cortex during attentional orienting in different spatial reference frames. Neuroimage 25: 668-683. Chechlacz, M., P. Rotshtein, W.L. Bickerton, et al. 2010. Separating neural correlates of allocentric and egocentric neglect: distinct cortical sites and common white matter disconnections. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 27: 277-303. Tipper, S.P. & M. Behrmann. 1996. Object-centered not scene-based visual neglect. J. Exp. Psychol. 22: 1261-1278. Humphreys, G.W. & M.J. Riddoch. 1995. Separate coding of space within and between perceptual objects: evidence from unilateral neglect. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 12: 283-311. Driver, J. & P.W. Halligan. 1991. Can visual neglect operate in object-cntred coordinates? An affirmative single-case study. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 8: 475-496. Weiss, P.H., J.C. Marshall, G. Wunderlich, et al. 2000. Neural consequences of acting in near versus far space: a physiological basis for clinical dissociations. Brain 123: 2531-2541. Handy, T.C., S.T. Grafton, N.M. Shroff, et al. 2003. Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized. Nat. Neurosci. 6: 421-427. Behrmann, M. & M. Moscovitch. 1994. Object-centered neglect in patients with unilateral neglect: effects of left-right coordinates of objects. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 6: 1-16. Farah, M.J., J.L. Brunn, A.B. Wong, et al. 1990. Frames of reference for allocating attention to space: evidence from the neglect syndrome. Neuropsychologia 28: 335-347. Yue, Y., W. Song, S. Huo & M. Wang. 2012. Study on the occurrence and neural bases of hemispatial neglect with different reference frames. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 93: 156-162. Rorden, C., H. Hjaltason, P. Fillmore, et al. 2012. Allocentric neglect strongly associated with egocentric neglect. Neuropsychologia 50: 1151-1157. Marr, D. 1982. Vision. San Fransisco: W.H. Freeman. Humphreys, G.W. & D. Heinke. 1998. Spatial representation and selection in the brain: neuropsychological and computational constraints. Vis. Cogn. 5: 9-47. Delis, D., L. Robertson & R. Efron. 1986. Hemispheric specialisation of memory for visual hierarchical stimuli. Neuropsychologia 24: 205-214. Posner, M.I. 1980. Orienting of attention. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 32: 3-25. Forti, S. & G.W. Humphreys. 2008. Lower visual-field sensitivity to object viewpoint and action instruction in search. Psychol. Sci. 19: 42-48 Ackroyd, K., M.J. Riddoch, G.W. Humphreys & S. Townsend. 2002. When near becomes far and left becomes right: using a tool to extend extrapersonal visual space in a patient with severe neglect. Neurocase 8: 1-12. Egly, R., J. Driver & R.D. Rafal. 1994. Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. J. Exp. Psychol. 123: 161-171. Buxbaum, L.J., H.B. Coslett, M.W. Montgomery & M.J. Farah. 1996. Mental rotation may underlie apparent object-based neglect. Neuropsychologia 14: 113-126. Previc, F.H. 1990. Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications. Behav. Brain Sci. 13: 519-542. Humphreys, G.W. & M.J. Riddoch. 1994. Attention to within-object and between-object spatial representations. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 11: 207-241. Driver, J. & A. Pouget. 2000. Object-centered visual neglect, or relative egocentric neglect? J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12: 542-545. Medina, J., V. Kannan, M.A. Pawlak, et al. 2009. Neural substrates of visuospatial processing in distinct reference frames: evidence from unilateral spatial neglect. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 21: 2073-2084. Mavritsaki, E., D. Heinke, G. Deco & G.W. Humphreys. 2009. Simulating posterior parietal damage in a biologically plausible framework: neuropsychological tests of the search over time and space model. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 26: 343-390. Heinke, D. & G.W. Humphreys. 2003. Attention, spatial representation and visual neglect: simulating emergent attention and spatial attention in the selective attention for identification model (SAIM). Psychol. Rev. 110: 29-87. Driver, J., G.C. Baylis, S.J. Goodrich & R.D. Rafal. 1994. Axis based neglect of visual shapes. Neuropsychologia 32: 1358-1365. Halligan & Marshall. 1991. Left neglect for near but not far space in man. Nature 350: 498-450 Verdon, V., S. Schwartz, K.O. Lovblad, et al. 2010. Neuroanatomy of hemispatial neglect and its functional components: a study using voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. Brain 133: 880-894. Mavritsaki, E., H.A. Allen & G.W. Humphreys. 2010. Decomposing the neural mechanisms of visual search through model-based analysis of fMRI: top-down excitation, active ignoring and the use of saliency by the right TPJ. Neuroimage 52: 934-946. Halligan, P.W. & J.C. Marshall. 1994. Focal and global attention modulate the expression of visuo-spatial neglect: a case study. Neuropsychologia 32: 13-21. Humphreys, G.W., W.-L. Bickerton, D. Samson & M.J. Riddoch. 2012. BCoS: Cognitive Profiling after Brain Injury. London: Psychology Press. Monk, A.F. 1985. Coordinate systems in visual word recognition. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. Sect. A 37: 613-625. Cowey, A., M. Small & S. Ellis. 1994. Left visuospatial neglect can be worse in far than near space. Neuropsychologia 32: 1059-1066. 1991; 350 1990; 13 2009; 21 2012 2008; 19 1995; 12 2002; 8 1994 1996; 14 1991; 8 2003; 110 2009; 26 1987; 37 2005; 25 1994; 123 2012; 50 2012; 93 2010; 27 1990; 28 2000; 12 2003; 6 1986; 24 1980; 32 2010; 133 1994; 11 1982 2011; 23 2011; 25 2000; 123 1998; 5 1985; 37 1990; 7 2010; 52 1994; 32 1994; 6 1996; 22 1996; 7 e_1_2_10_23_1 e_1_2_10_24_1 e_1_2_10_21_1 e_1_2_10_22_1 e_1_2_10_20_1 Tipper S.P. (e_1_2_10_13_1) 1996; 22 e_1_2_10_2_1 e_1_2_10_18_1 e_1_2_10_3_1 e_1_2_10_19_1 e_1_2_10_6_1 e_1_2_10_16_1 e_1_2_10_39_1 e_1_2_10_5_1 e_1_2_10_17_1 e_1_2_10_38_1 e_1_2_10_8_1 e_1_2_10_14_1 e_1_2_10_37_1 e_1_2_10_7_1 e_1_2_10_15_1 e_1_2_10_36_1 Behrmann M. (e_1_2_10_12_1) 1994 e_1_2_10_35_1 e_1_2_10_9_1 e_1_2_10_34_1 e_1_2_10_10_1 e_1_2_10_33_1 e_1_2_10_11_1 e_1_2_10_32_1 e_1_2_10_31_1 e_1_2_10_30_1 Marr D. (e_1_2_10_4_1) 1982 Humphreys G.W. (e_1_2_10_40_1) 2012 e_1_2_10_29_1 e_1_2_10_27_1 e_1_2_10_28_1 e_1_2_10_25_1 e_1_2_10_26_1
References_xml	– reference: Farah, M.J., J.L. Brunn, A.B. Wong, et al. 1990. Frames of reference for allocating attention to space: evidence from the neglect syndrome. Neuropsychologia 28: 335-347. – reference: Humphreys, G.W., W.-L. Bickerton, D. Samson & M.J. Riddoch. 2012. BCoS: Cognitive Profiling after Brain Injury. London: Psychology Press. – reference: Caramazza, A. & A.E. Hillis. 1990. Levels of representation, co-ordinate frames, and unilateral neglect. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 7: 391-445. – reference: Halligan & Marshall. 1991. Left neglect for near but not far space in man. Nature 350: 498-450 – reference: Chechlacz, M., P. Rotshtein, W.L. Bickerton, et al. 2010. Separating neural correlates of allocentric and egocentric neglect: distinct cortical sites and common white matter disconnections. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 27: 277-303. – reference: Verdon, V., S. Schwartz, K.O. Lovblad, et al. 2010. Neuroanatomy of hemispatial neglect and its functional components: a study using voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. Brain 133: 880-894. – reference: Humphreys, G.W. & M.J. Riddoch. 1994. Attention to within-object and between-object spatial representations. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 11: 207-241. – reference: Mavritsaki, E., D. Heinke, G. Deco & G.W. Humphreys. 2009. Simulating posterior parietal damage in a biologically plausible framework: neuropsychological tests of the search over time and space model. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 26: 343-390. – reference: Behrmann, M. & M. Moscovitch. 1994. Object-centered neglect in patients with unilateral neglect: effects of left-right coordinates of objects. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 6: 1-16. – reference: Egly, R., J. Driver & R.D. Rafal. 1994. Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. J. Exp. Psychol. 123: 161-171. – reference: Humphreys, G.W. & M.J. Riddoch. 1995. Separate coding of space within and between perceptual objects: evidence from unilateral neglect. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 12: 283-311. – reference: Weiss, P.H., J.C. Marshall, G. Wunderlich, et al. 2000. Neural consequences of acting in near versus far space: a physiological basis for clinical dissociations. Brain 123: 2531-2541. – reference: Driver, J., G.C. Baylis, S.J. Goodrich & R.D. Rafal. 1994. Axis based neglect of visual shapes. Neuropsychologia 32: 1358-1365. – reference: Buxbaum, L.J., H.B. Coslett, M.W. Montgomery & M.J. Farah. 1996. Mental rotation may underlie apparent object-based neglect. Neuropsychologia 14: 113-126. – reference: Humphreys, G.W. & D. Heinke. 1998. Spatial representation and selection in the brain: neuropsychological and computational constraints. Vis. Cogn. 5: 9-47. – reference: Cowey, A., M. Small & S. Ellis. 1994. Left visuospatial neglect can be worse in far than near space. Neuropsychologia 32: 1059-1066. – reference: Tipper, S.P. & M. Behrmann. 1996. Object-centered not scene-based visual neglect. J. Exp. Psychol. 22: 1261-1278. – reference: Mavritsaki, E., H.A. Allen & G.W. Humphreys. 2010. Decomposing the neural mechanisms of visual search through model-based analysis of fMRI: top-down excitation, active ignoring and the use of saliency by the right TPJ. Neuroimage 52: 934-946. – reference: Posner, M.I. 1980. Orienting of attention. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 32: 3-25. – reference: Delis, D., L. Robertson & R. Efron. 1986. Hemispheric specialisation of memory for visual hierarchical stimuli. Neuropsychologia 24: 205-214. – reference: Medina, J., V. Kannan, M.A. Pawlak, et al. 2009. Neural substrates of visuospatial processing in distinct reference frames: evidence from unilateral spatial neglect. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 21: 2073-2084. – reference: Bickerton, W.L., D. Samson, J. Williamson & G.W. Humphreys. 2011. Separating forms of neglect using the Apples test validation and functional prediction in chronic and acute stroke. Neuropsychology 25: 567-580. – reference: Previc, F.H. 1990. Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications. Behav. Brain Sci. 13: 519-542. – reference: Halligan, P.W. & J.C. Marshall. 1994. Focal and global attention modulate the expression of visuo-spatial neglect: a case study. Neuropsychologia 32: 13-21. – reference: Yue, Y., W. Song, S. Huo & M. Wang. 2012. Study on the occurrence and neural bases of hemispatial neglect with different reference frames. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 93: 156-162. – reference: Karnath, H.O., A. Mandler & S. Clavagnier. 2011. Object-based neglect varies with egocentric position. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23: 2983-2993. – reference: Calvanio, R., P.N. Petrone & D.N. Levine. 1987. Left visual spatial neglect is both environment-centered and body-centered. Neurology 37: 1179-1183. – reference: Handy, T.C., S.T. Grafton, N.M. Shroff, et al. 2003. Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized. Nat. Neurosci. 6: 421-427. – reference: Rorden, C., H. Hjaltason, P. Fillmore, et al. 2012. Allocentric neglect strongly associated with egocentric neglect. Neuropsychologia 50: 1151-1157. – reference: Driver, J. & P.W. Halligan. 1991. Can visual neglect operate in object-cntred coordinates? An affirmative single-case study. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 8: 475-496. – reference: Wilson, K.D, M.G. Woldorff & G.R. Mangun. 2005. Control networks and hemispheric asymmetries in parietal cortex during attentional orienting in different spatial reference frames. Neuroimage 25: 668-683. – reference: Driver, J. & A. Pouget. 2000. Object-centered visual neglect, or relative egocentric neglect? J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12: 542-545. – reference: Ackroyd, K., M.J. Riddoch, G.W. Humphreys & S. Townsend. 2002. When near becomes far and left becomes right: using a tool to extend extrapersonal visual space in a patient with severe neglect. Neurocase 8: 1-12. – reference: Monk, A.F. 1985. Coordinate systems in visual word recognition. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. Sect. A 37: 613-625. – reference: Forti, S. & G.W. Humphreys. 2008. Lower visual-field sensitivity to object viewpoint and action instruction in search. Psychol. Sci. 19: 42-48 – reference: Heinke, D. & G.W. Humphreys. 2003. Attention, spatial representation and visual neglect: simulating emergent attention and spatial attention in the selective attention for identification model (SAIM). Psychol. Rev. 110: 29-87. – reference: Marr, D. 1982. Vision. San Fransisco: W.H. Freeman. – reference: Iriki, A., M. Tanaka & Y. Iwamura. 1996. Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. Neuroreport 7: 2325-2330. – volume: 123 start-page: 2531 year: 2000 end-page: 2541 article-title: Neural consequences of acting in near versus far space: a physiological basis for clinical dissociations publication-title: Brain – volume: 23 start-page: 2983 year: 2011 end-page: 2993 article-title: Object‐based neglect varies with egocentric position publication-title: J. Cogn. Neurosci. – volume: 123 start-page: 161 year: 1994 end-page: 171 article-title: Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects publication-title: J. Exp. Psychol. – volume: 12 start-page: 542 year: 2000 end-page: 545 article-title: Object‐centered visual neglect, or relative egocentric neglect? publication-title: J. Cogn. Neurosci. – volume: 32 start-page: 1059 year: 1994 end-page: 1066 article-title: Left visuospatial neglect can be worse in far than near space publication-title: Neuropsychologia – volume: 50 start-page: 1151 year: 2012 end-page: 1157 article-title: Allocentric neglect strongly associated with egocentric neglect publication-title: Neuropsychologia – volume: 27 start-page: 277 year: 2010 end-page: 303 article-title: Separating neural correlates of allocentric and egocentric neglect: distinct cortical sites and common white matter disconnections publication-title: Cogn. Neuropsychol. – start-page: 351 year: 1994 end-page: 375 – volume: 13 start-page: 519 year: 1990 end-page: 542 article-title: Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications publication-title: Behav. Brain Sci. – volume: 6 start-page: 1 year: 1994 end-page: 16 article-title: Object‐centered neglect in patients with unilateral neglect: effects of left‐right coordinates of objects publication-title: J. Cogn. Neurosci. – volume: 7 start-page: 391 year: 1990 end-page: 445 article-title: Levels of representation, co‐ordinate frames, and unilateral neglect publication-title: Cogn. Neuropsychol. – volume: 52 start-page: 934 year: 2010 end-page: 946 article-title: Decomposing the neural mechanisms of visual search through model‐based analysis of fMRI: top‐down excitation, active ignoring and the use of saliency by the right TPJ publication-title: Neuroimage – volume: 22 start-page: 1261 year: 1996 end-page: 1278 article-title: Object‐centered not scene‐based visual neglect publication-title: J. Exp. Psychol. – volume: 7 start-page: 2325 year: 1996 end-page: 2330 article-title: Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones publication-title: Neuroreport – volume: 26 start-page: 343 year: 2009 end-page: 390 article-title: Simulating posterior parietal damage in a biologically plausible framework: neuropsychological tests of the search over time and space model publication-title: Cogn. Neuropsychol. – volume: 11 start-page: 207 year: 1994 end-page: 241 article-title: Attention to within‐object and between‐object spatial representations publication-title: Cogn. Neuropsychol. – volume: 19 start-page: 42 year: 2008 end-page: 48 article-title: Lower visual‐field sensitivity to object viewpoint and action instruction in search publication-title: Psychol. Sci. – year: 2012 – volume: 5 start-page: 9 year: 1998 end-page: 47 article-title: Spatial representation and selection in the brain: neuropsychological and computational constraints publication-title: Vis. Cogn. – volume: 25 start-page: 567 year: 2011 end-page: 580 article-title: Separating forms of neglect using the Apples test validation and functional prediction in chronic and acute stroke publication-title: Neuropsychology – volume: 8 start-page: 475 year: 1991 end-page: 496 article-title: Can visual neglect operate in object‐cntred coordinates? An affirmative single‐case study publication-title: Cogn. Neuropsychol. – volume: 28 start-page: 335 year: 1990 end-page: 347 article-title: Frames of reference for allocating attention to space: evidence from the neglect syndrome publication-title: Neuropsychologia – volume: 6 start-page: 421 year: 2003 end-page: 427 article-title: Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized publication-title: Nat. Neurosci. – year: 1982 – volume: 8 start-page: 1 year: 2002 end-page: 12 article-title: When near becomes far and left becomes right: using a tool to extend extrapersonal visual space in a patient with severe neglect publication-title: Neurocase – volume: 133 start-page: 880 year: 2010 end-page: 894 article-title: Neuroanatomy of hemispatial neglect and its functional components: a study using voxel‐based lesion‐symptom mapping publication-title: Brain – volume: 25 start-page: 668 year: 2005 end-page: 683 article-title: Control networks and hemispheric asymmetries in parietal cortex during attentional orienting in different spatial reference frames publication-title: Neuroimage – volume: 14 start-page: 113 year: 1996 end-page: 126 article-title: Mental rotation may underlie apparent object‐based neglect publication-title: Neuropsychologia – volume: 32 start-page: 3 year: 1980 end-page: 25 article-title: Orienting of attention publication-title: Q. J. Exp. Psychol. – volume: 110 start-page: 29 year: 2003 end-page: 87 article-title: Attention, spatial representation and visual neglect: simulating emergent attention and spatial attention in the selective attention for identification model (SAIM) publication-title: Psychol. Rev. – volume: 21 start-page: 2073 year: 2009 end-page: 2084 article-title: Neural substrates of visuospatial processing in distinct reference frames: evidence from unilateral spatial neglect publication-title: J. Cogn. Neurosci. – volume: 37 start-page: 613 year: 1985 end-page: 625 article-title: Coordinate systems in visual word recognition publication-title: Q. J. Exp. Psychol. Sect. A – volume: 32 start-page: 13 year: 1994 end-page: 21 article-title: Focal and global attention modulate the expression of visuo‐spatial neglect: a case study publication-title: Neuropsychologia – volume: 350 start-page: 498 year: 1991 end-page: 450 article-title: Left neglect for near but not far space in man publication-title: Nature – volume: 37 start-page: 1179 year: 1987 end-page: 1183 article-title: Left visual spatial neglect is both environment‐centered and body‐centered publication-title: Neurology – volume: 12 start-page: 283 year: 1995 end-page: 311 article-title: Separate coding of space within and between perceptual objects: evidence from unilateral neglect publication-title: Cogn. Neuropsychol. – volume: 93 start-page: 156 year: 2012 end-page: 162 article-title: Study on the occurrence and neural bases of hemispatial neglect with different reference frames publication-title: Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. – volume: 24 start-page: 205 year: 1986 end-page: 214 article-title: Hemispheric specialisation of memory for visual hierarchical stimuli publication-title: Neuropsychologia – volume: 32 start-page: 1358 year: 1994 end-page: 1365 article-title: Axis based neglect of visual shapes publication-title: Neuropsychologia – ident: e_1_2_10_21_1 doi: 10.1038/nn1031 – ident: e_1_2_10_8_1 doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.123.2.161 – ident: e_1_2_10_27_1 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.03.031 – ident: e_1_2_10_5_1 doi: 10.1080/14640748508400922 – ident: e_1_2_10_24_1 doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00088-7 – ident: e_1_2_10_30_1 doi: 10.1162/089892900562192 – ident: e_1_2_10_33_1 doi: 10.1080/02643299408251974 – ident: e_1_2_10_6_1 doi: 10.1080/02643299008253450 – ident: e_1_2_10_11_1 doi: 10.1162/jocn.1994.6.1.1 – ident: e_1_2_10_3_1 doi: 10.1080/02643299108253384 – ident: e_1_2_10_22_1 doi: 10.1097/00001756-199610020-00010 – volume-title: BCoS: Cognitive Profiling after Brain Injury year: 2012 ident: e_1_2_10_40_1 – ident: e_1_2_10_17_1 doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(94)90152-X – ident: e_1_2_10_25_1 doi: 10.1080/713756777 – ident: e_1_2_10_20_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02044.x – ident: e_1_2_10_34_1 doi: 10.1080/02643299508252000 – ident: e_1_2_10_15_1 doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(90)90060-2 – ident: e_1_2_10_7_1 doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(94)00068-9 – ident: e_1_2_10_19_1 doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00080018 – ident: e_1_2_10_29_1 doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00005 – ident: e_1_2_10_32_1 doi: 10.1093/brain/awp305 – ident: e_1_2_10_39_1 doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(86)90053-9 – ident: e_1_2_10_37_1 doi: 10.1080/02643290903424329 – ident: e_1_2_10_38_1 doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(94)90065-5 – start-page: 351 volume-title: Attention and Performance XV year: 1994 ident: e_1_2_10_12_1 – ident: e_1_2_10_28_1 doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.07.192 – ident: e_1_2_10_10_1 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.075 – ident: e_1_2_10_23_1 doi: 10.1093/neucas/8.1.1 – ident: e_1_2_10_9_1 doi: 10.1080/00335558008248231 – ident: e_1_2_10_18_1 doi: 10.1093/brain/123.12.2531 – ident: e_1_2_10_26_1 doi: 10.1080/02643294.2010.519699 – ident: e_1_2_10_31_1 doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.21160 – ident: e_1_2_10_35_1 doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.29 – ident: e_1_2_10_2_1 doi: 10.1037/a0023501 – volume-title: Vision year: 1982 ident: e_1_2_10_4_1 – ident: e_1_2_10_14_1 doi: 10.1212/WNL.37.7.1179 – ident: e_1_2_10_16_1 doi: 10.1038/350498a0 – ident: e_1_2_10_36_1 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.044 – volume: 22 start-page: 1261 year: 1996 ident: e_1_2_10_13_1 article-title: Object‐centered not scene‐based visual neglect publication-title: J. Exp. Psychol.
SSID	ssj0012847
Score	2.183116
SecondaryResourceType	review_article
Snippet	We review neuropsychological evidence for visual selection operating in different reference frames. There is general agreement that there may be a separation...
SourceID	proquest pubmed crossref wiley istex
SourceType	Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher
StartPage	75
SubjectTerms	attention Attention - physiology Coding Computation Computer Simulation Humans neglect Patients Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology Photic Stimulation reference frame Reference Standards Representations Separation Space Perception - physiology Stimuli Visual
Title	Reference frames in visual selection
URI	https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-380KK565-8/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fnyas.12256 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23991639 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1443515925 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1429638135 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1439737299
Volume	1296
WOSCitedRecordID	wos000324835300006&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText	1
inHoldings	1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights	– providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library Full Collection 2020 customDbUrl: eissn: 1749-6632 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0012847 issn: 0077-8923 databaseCode: DRFUL dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3dS9xAEB_UU_DF1o9qrJUURWohYm6z2V3oi7S9FixHqUqvTyH7BYcS5eKJ_ved2eTSCiKUvgV2smzma3-TnZ0B2LeZdg5hAsYm3CSZ4zxRhvvEZzL3mnnHhQ3NJsRwKEcj9X0OPszuwjT1IbofbmQZwV-TgZe6_svIq4eyPkpRHfN56NGtKgy9ep9-DC6-dacI5HqDJxboiRHJtOVJKZPnz9uPNqQe8fb-KbT5GLyG3Wfw4v_W_RJWWtQZnzRqsgpzrlqDpaYP5cMarLYWXsfv2jLUh-uw39WgjT1lcNXxuIrvxvUUJ6pD9xwU6QZcDD6ff_yatD0VEoOBRp5YLaSVwmZKpsdOGYU7vNZKek91fJhQMtcpFyg_47RmmkmvtEUMILTKtUvZK1ioriu3BbETJrVaa4QwNitNWgrLcgJhnjHDmY_gcMbYwrQFx6nvxVUxCzyIFUVgRQR7He1NU2bjSaqDIJ-OpJxcUmKa4MXP4ZeCyePTUwSohYxgZybAorVJnCJDaIjorc8jeNsNozXREUlZuesp0fTJI6XsWRrEcHTaqSLYbJSjWxDdFEaEiyPvgw488zHF8NfJWXja_hfi17DcDx05KAdxBxZuJ1P3BhbN3e24nuzCvBjJ3dYOfgMHtwfJ
linkProvider	Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3da9RAEB_0TtEXa2vV1KoRi9hCpLlNsruPRT0rdwbRltankP2CQ0nl0iv2v-_MZi-1UAriW2Bnl8187W93Z2cAtkymrEWYgHuTXCeZzfNE6twlLhOFU8zZnBtfbIKXpTg-ll9DbA69henyQ_QHbmQZ3l-TgdOB9F9W3pzX7bsU9bG4DcOsYFwMYPjh2_hw2l8jkO_1rpijK0YoE_KTUijPZe8rK9KQmPvnOrh5Fb365We88p8TfwgPAu6M9zpFWYVbtlmDu10lyvM1WA023sZvQyLq7Uew1WehjR3FcLXxrInPZu0CB2p9_RwU6jocjj8evN9PQlWFRONWo0iM4sIIbjIp0l0rtcQ1XikpnKNMPoxLUag05yhBbZViigknlUEUwJUslE3ZYxg0J419CrHlOjVKKQQxJqt1WnPDCoJhjjGdMxfB9pKzlQ4px6nyxa9qufUgVlSeFRG87ml_d4k2rqV64wXUk9TznxSaxvPqqPxUMbE7mSBErUQEm0sJVsEqcYgMwSHit1Eewau-Ge2JLknqxp4siGZEPillN9IgiqP7ThnBk047-gnRW2HEuNiy45Xghp-pyh973_3Xxr8Qv4R7-wdfptX0czl5BvdHvj4HRSRuwuB0vrDP4Y4-O5218xfBHC4AnRUK0Q
linkToPdf	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3da9RAEB_0TsUXtfUrWjViEStEmttsdvexWE_lSihqsX0K2S84lLRcesX-985s9qKFUhDfAjtZNvO1v83MzgBs2kI7hzABzybcZIXjPFOG-8wXsvSaeceFDc0mRFXJw0O1H3Nz6C5MXx9i-OFGlhH8NRm4O7H-Lytvz5vuXY76WF6HccEVL0Yw3v0yPdgbwgjke4MrFuiKEcrE-qSUyvPn7Qs70piY--syuHkRvYbtZ3r3Pxd-D-5E3Jnu9IqyBtdcuw43-06U5-uwFm28S9_EQtRb92FzqEKbesrh6tJ5m57NuyVO1IX-OSjUB3Aw_fDt_acsdlXIDB41ysxqIa0UtlAy33bKKNzjtVbSe6rkw4SSpc65QAkapzXTTHqlLaIAoVWpXc4ewqg9bt1jSJ0wudVaI4ixRWPyRlhWEgzzjBnOfAJbK87WJpYcp84XP-vV0YNYUQdWJPBqoD3pC21cSvU6CGggaRY_KDVN8Pp79bFmcns2Q4haywQ2VhKso1XiFAWCQ8RvE57Ay2EY7YmCJE3rjpdEMyGflLMraRDFUbxTJfCo145hQXRXGDEujrwNSnDFx9TV0c7X8PTkX4hfwK393Wm997maPYXbk9CegxISN2B0uli6Z3DDnJ3Ou8XzaA2_ARgMCkw
openUrl	ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reference+frames+in+visual+selection&rft.jtitle=Annals+of+the+New+York+Academy+of+Sciences&rft.au=Humphreys%2C+Glyn+W&rft.au=Gillebert%2C+Celine+R&rft.au=Chechlacz%2C+Magda&rft.au=Riddoch%2C+M+Jane&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.eissn=1749-6632&rft.volume=1296&rft.spage=75&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fnyas.12256&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F23991639&rft.externalDocID=23991639
thumbnail_l	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0077-8923&client=summon
thumbnail_m	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0077-8923&client=summon
thumbnail_s	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0077-8923&client=summon