Arrange and average algorithm for the retrieval of aerosol parameters from multiwavelength high-spectral-resolution lidar/Raman lidar data
We present the results of a feasibility study in which a simple, automated, and unsupervised algorithm, which we call the arrange and average algorithm, is used to infer microphysical parameters (complex refractive index, effective radius, total number, surface area, and volume concentrations) of at...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | Applied optics. Optical technology and biomedical optics Ročník 53; číslo 31; s. 7252 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , , , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
United States
01.11.2014
|
| ISSN: | 1559-128X, 2155-3165, 1539-4522 |
| On-line přístup: | Zjistit podrobnosti o přístupu |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Abstract | We present the results of a feasibility study in which a simple, automated, and unsupervised algorithm, which we call the arrange and average algorithm, is used to infer microphysical parameters (complex refractive index, effective radius, total number, surface area, and volume concentrations) of atmospheric aerosol particles. The algorithm uses backscatter coefficients at 355, 532, and 1064 nm and extinction coefficients at 355 and 532 nm as input information. Testing of the algorithm is based on synthetic optical data that are computed from prescribed monomodal particle size distributions and complex refractive indices that describe spherical, primarily fine mode pollution particles. We tested the performance of the algorithm for the "3 backscatter (β)+2 extinction (α)" configuration of a multiwavelength aerosol high-spectral-resolution lidar (HSRL) or Raman lidar. We investigated the degree to which the microphysical results retrieved by this algorithm depends on the number of input backscatter and extinction coefficients. For example, we tested "3β+1α," "2β+1α," and "3β" lidar configurations. This arrange and average algorithm can be used in two ways. First, it can be applied for quick data processing of experimental data acquired with lidar. Fast automated retrievals of microphysical particle properties are needed in view of the enormous amount of data that can be acquired by the NASA Langley Research Center's airborne "3β+2α" High-Spectral-Resolution Lidar (HSRL-2). It would prove useful for the growing number of ground-based multiwavelength lidar networks, and it would provide an option for analyzing the vast amount of optical data acquired with a future spaceborne multiwavelength lidar. The second potential application is to improve the microphysical particle characterization with our existing inversion algorithm that uses Tikhonov's inversion with regularization. This advanced algorithm has recently undergone development to allow automated and unsupervised processing; the arrange and average algorithm can be used as a preclassifier to further improve its speed and precision. First tests of the performance of arrange and average algorithm are encouraging. We used a set of 48 different monomodal particle size distributions, 4 real parts and 15 imaginary parts of the complex refractive index. All in all we tested 2880 different optical data sets for 0%, 10%, and 20% Gaussian measurement noise (one-standard deviation). In the case of the "3β+2α" configuration with 10% measurement noise, we retrieve the particle effective radius to within 27% for 1964 (68.2%) of the test optical data sets. The number concentration is obtained to 76%, the surface area concentration to 16%, and the volume concentration to 30% precision. The "3β" configuration performs significantly poorer. The performance of the "3β+1α" and "2β+1α" configurations is intermediate between the "3β+2α" and the "3β." |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | We present the results of a feasibility study in which a simple, automated, and unsupervised algorithm, which we call the arrange and average algorithm, is used to infer microphysical parameters (complex refractive index, effective radius, total number, surface area, and volume concentrations) of atmospheric aerosol particles. The algorithm uses backscatter coefficients at 355, 532, and 1064 nm and extinction coefficients at 355 and 532 nm as input information. Testing of the algorithm is based on synthetic optical data that are computed from prescribed monomodal particle size distributions and complex refractive indices that describe spherical, primarily fine mode pollution particles. We tested the performance of the algorithm for the "3 backscatter (β)+2 extinction (α)" configuration of a multiwavelength aerosol high-spectral-resolution lidar (HSRL) or Raman lidar. We investigated the degree to which the microphysical results retrieved by this algorithm depends on the number of input backscatter and extinction coefficients. For example, we tested "3β+1α," "2β+1α," and "3β" lidar configurations. This arrange and average algorithm can be used in two ways. First, it can be applied for quick data processing of experimental data acquired with lidar. Fast automated retrievals of microphysical particle properties are needed in view of the enormous amount of data that can be acquired by the NASA Langley Research Center's airborne "3β+2α" High-Spectral-Resolution Lidar (HSRL-2). It would prove useful for the growing number of ground-based multiwavelength lidar networks, and it would provide an option for analyzing the vast amount of optical data acquired with a future spaceborne multiwavelength lidar. The second potential application is to improve the microphysical particle characterization with our existing inversion algorithm that uses Tikhonov's inversion with regularization. This advanced algorithm has recently undergone development to allow automated and unsupervised processing; the arrange and average algorithm can be used as a preclassifier to further improve its speed and precision. First tests of the performance of arrange and average algorithm are encouraging. We used a set of 48 different monomodal particle size distributions, 4 real parts and 15 imaginary parts of the complex refractive index. All in all we tested 2880 different optical data sets for 0%, 10%, and 20% Gaussian measurement noise (one-standard deviation). In the case of the "3β+2α" configuration with 10% measurement noise, we retrieve the particle effective radius to within 27% for 1964 (68.2%) of the test optical data sets. The number concentration is obtained to 76%, the surface area concentration to 16%, and the volume concentration to 30% precision. The "3β" configuration performs significantly poorer. The performance of the "3β+1α" and "2β+1α" configurations is intermediate between the "3β+2α" and the "3β." We present the results of a feasibility study in which a simple, automated, and unsupervised algorithm, which we call the arrange and average algorithm, is used to infer microphysical parameters (complex refractive index, effective radius, total number, surface area, and volume concentrations) of atmospheric aerosol particles. The algorithm uses backscatter coefficients at 355, 532, and 1064 nm and extinction coefficients at 355 and 532 nm as input information. Testing of the algorithm is based on synthetic optical data that are computed from prescribed monomodal particle size distributions and complex refractive indices that describe spherical, primarily fine mode pollution particles. We tested the performance of the algorithm for the "3 backscatter (β)+2 extinction (α)" configuration of a multiwavelength aerosol high-spectral-resolution lidar (HSRL) or Raman lidar. We investigated the degree to which the microphysical results retrieved by this algorithm depends on the number of input backscatter and extinction coefficients. For example, we tested "3β+1α," "2β+1α," and "3β" lidar configurations. This arrange and average algorithm can be used in two ways. First, it can be applied for quick data processing of experimental data acquired with lidar. Fast automated retrievals of microphysical particle properties are needed in view of the enormous amount of data that can be acquired by the NASA Langley Research Center's airborne "3β+2α" High-Spectral-Resolution Lidar (HSRL-2). It would prove useful for the growing number of ground-based multiwavelength lidar networks, and it would provide an option for analyzing the vast amount of optical data acquired with a future spaceborne multiwavelength lidar. The second potential application is to improve the microphysical particle characterization with our existing inversion algorithm that uses Tikhonov's inversion with regularization. This advanced algorithm has recently undergone development to allow automated and unsupervised processing; the arrange and average algorithm can be used as a preclassifier to further improve its speed and precision. First tests of the performance of arrange and average algorithm are encouraging. We used a set of 48 different monomodal particle size distributions, 4 real parts and 15 imaginary parts of the complex refractive index. All in all we tested 2880 different optical data sets for 0%, 10%, and 20% Gaussian measurement noise (one-standard deviation). In the case of the "3β+2α" configuration with 10% measurement noise, we retrieve the particle effective radius to within 27% for 1964 (68.2%) of the test optical data sets. The number concentration is obtained to 76%, the surface area concentration to 16%, and the volume concentration to 30% precision. The "3β" configuration performs significantly poorer. The performance of the "3β+1α" and "2β+1α" configurations is intermediate between the "3β+2α" and the "3β."We present the results of a feasibility study in which a simple, automated, and unsupervised algorithm, which we call the arrange and average algorithm, is used to infer microphysical parameters (complex refractive index, effective radius, total number, surface area, and volume concentrations) of atmospheric aerosol particles. The algorithm uses backscatter coefficients at 355, 532, and 1064 nm and extinction coefficients at 355 and 532 nm as input information. Testing of the algorithm is based on synthetic optical data that are computed from prescribed monomodal particle size distributions and complex refractive indices that describe spherical, primarily fine mode pollution particles. We tested the performance of the algorithm for the "3 backscatter (β)+2 extinction (α)" configuration of a multiwavelength aerosol high-spectral-resolution lidar (HSRL) or Raman lidar. We investigated the degree to which the microphysical results retrieved by this algorithm depends on the number of input backscatter and extinction coefficients. For example, we tested "3β+1α," "2β+1α," and "3β" lidar configurations. This arrange and average algorithm can be used in two ways. First, it can be applied for quick data processing of experimental data acquired with lidar. Fast automated retrievals of microphysical particle properties are needed in view of the enormous amount of data that can be acquired by the NASA Langley Research Center's airborne "3β+2α" High-Spectral-Resolution Lidar (HSRL-2). It would prove useful for the growing number of ground-based multiwavelength lidar networks, and it would provide an option for analyzing the vast amount of optical data acquired with a future spaceborne multiwavelength lidar. The second potential application is to improve the microphysical particle characterization with our existing inversion algorithm that uses Tikhonov's inversion with regularization. This advanced algorithm has recently undergone development to allow automated and unsupervised processing; the arrange and average algorithm can be used as a preclassifier to further improve its speed and precision. First tests of the performance of arrange and average algorithm are encouraging. We used a set of 48 different monomodal particle size distributions, 4 real parts and 15 imaginary parts of the complex refractive index. All in all we tested 2880 different optical data sets for 0%, 10%, and 20% Gaussian measurement noise (one-standard deviation). In the case of the "3β+2α" configuration with 10% measurement noise, we retrieve the particle effective radius to within 27% for 1964 (68.2%) of the test optical data sets. The number concentration is obtained to 76%, the surface area concentration to 16%, and the volume concentration to 30% precision. The "3β" configuration performs significantly poorer. The performance of the "3β+1α" and "2β+1α" configurations is intermediate between the "3β+2α" and the "3β." |
| Author | Müller, Detlef Hostetler, Chris Kolgotin, Alexei Burton, Sharon Ferrare, Richard Chemyakin, Eduard |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Eduard surname: Chemyakin fullname: Chemyakin, Eduard – sequence: 2 givenname: Detlef surname: Müller fullname: Müller, Detlef – sequence: 3 givenname: Sharon surname: Burton fullname: Burton, Sharon – sequence: 4 givenname: Alexei surname: Kolgotin fullname: Kolgotin, Alexei – sequence: 5 givenname: Chris surname: Hostetler fullname: Hostetler, Chris – sequence: 6 givenname: Richard surname: Ferrare fullname: Ferrare, Richard |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25402885$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNo1kD1PwzAURS0EgrawMSOPLGltJ7aTsUJ8SUhIqANb9Zo8N0FOXJ4dEH-BX00RZbpnuOcOd8qOhzAgY5dSzGVuisXyea7zuRBWaXXEJkpqneXS6GM22WOVSVW-nrFpjG9C5Lqo7Ck7U7oQqiz1hH0viWDYIoeh4fCBBL_st4G61PbcBeKpRU6YqMMP8Dw4DkghBs93QNBjQorcUeh5P_rUfe5HPA7b1PK227ZZ3GGdCHxGuHfG1IWB-64BWrxADwfmDSQ4ZycOfMSLQ87Y6u52dfOQPT3fP94sn7K6UDZlWgs0jbW2VEoayGuJbtNUrlKwMfWmEJV2JVqAqgawNodCNhbRamWdAKdm7PpvdkfhfcSY1n0Xa_QeBgxjXEujjDSF2QszdnWojpsem_WOuh7oa_1_n_oB5BZ2yQ |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rse_2022_113226 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_optcom_2022_129030 crossref_primary_10_1364_AO_55_008022 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs13193877 crossref_primary_10_1134_S1024856019060137 crossref_primary_10_5194_acp_17_7229_2017 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs16132265 crossref_primary_10_1364_AO_55_009839 crossref_primary_10_5194_amt_14_4755_2021 crossref_primary_10_1364_AO_55_002188 crossref_primary_10_5194_amt_9_5007_2016 crossref_primary_10_1364_AO_58_004981 crossref_primary_10_5194_amt_11_949_2018 crossref_primary_10_5194_amt_15_149_2022 crossref_primary_10_1088_1742_6596_3055_1_012040 crossref_primary_10_3390_atmos14071159 crossref_primary_10_1051_epjconf_201611923026 crossref_primary_10_1134_S1024856020040132 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jqsrt_2020_106932 crossref_primary_10_5194_amt_9_5555_2016 crossref_primary_10_1029_2017JD028102 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs14246208 crossref_primary_10_5194_amt_7_3487_2014 crossref_primary_10_1051_epjconf_201611917016 crossref_primary_10_1364_AO_57_002499 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| DBID | NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1364/AO.53.007252 |
| DatabaseName | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | no_fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Physics |
| EISSN | 2155-3165 1539-4522 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 25402885 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | 53G 5GY 8SL ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS H~9 NPM OPLUZ 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-550e6d77782216a3c1efbd9f92ab6cb4095f8e7aa9caa773a41d7ee7527f0af2 |
| IEDL.DBID | 7X8 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 29 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000343919400023&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1559-128X |
| IngestDate | Mon Sep 08 03:34:49 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:37:29 EDT 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 31 |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c427t-550e6d77782216a3c1efbd9f92ab6cb4095f8e7aa9caa773a41d7ee7527f0af2 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| PMID | 25402885 |
| PQID | 1626164675 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1626164675 pubmed_primary_25402885 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2014-11-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2014-11-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2014 text: 2014-11-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | Applied optics. Optical technology and biomedical optics |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Appl Opt |
| PublicationYear | 2014 |
| SSID | ssj0035497 |
| Score | 2.3042486 |
| Snippet | We present the results of a feasibility study in which a simple, automated, and unsupervised algorithm, which we call the arrange and average algorithm, is... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
| StartPage | 7252 |
| Title | Arrange and average algorithm for the retrieval of aerosol parameters from multiwavelength high-spectral-resolution lidar/Raman lidar data |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25402885 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1626164675 |
| Volume | 53 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000343919400023&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3JTsMwELWAgsSFfSmbjMTVlMRJ3JxQhai4UCrEobdq4qVFapOSFPgHvpoZN8AJCYlL5IujyBmP33jezGPsAr2hCSw4Ia9cJhBSg8gQ1ovYSmNckIQhOC82oXq99mCQ9usLt6qmVX75RO-oTaHpjryF0xLqhaXi69mLINUoyq7WEhrLrCERyhClSw2-swgSYx8vroKoWaAfHtTEd5lErc7DZSx932wqOfoNXPpDprv538_bYhs1vOSdhT1ssyWb77A1T_PU1S776JQlVRNwyA0HtGKg8WSEb5qPpxwBLEdAyEsvs4U2yAvHweJBWkw4NQmfEnmm4lSTwj0V8R1IuCIfzcecGh8LX7hZwkRgFF8bNZ88GyhbjzCFesyJlrrHnrq3Tzd3olZjEDoK1VxgKGMToxRBiiABqQPrMpO6NIQs0RnGibFrWwWQagClJESBUdaqOFTuCly4z1byIreHjAftLMI4UidZSnrXiBgMut041UGoQimhyc6_1niIxk4ZDMht8VoNf1a5yQ4WP2o4W3TlGGKki1ipHR_9YfYxW0fgEy1qCk9Yw-FWt6dsVb_Nn6vyzFsRPnv9-0-XTdTu |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Arrange+and+average+algorithm+for+the+retrieval+of+aerosol+parameters+from+multiwavelength+high-spectral-resolution+lidar%2FRaman+lidar+data&rft.jtitle=Applied+optics.+Optical+technology+and+biomedical+optics&rft.au=Chemyakin%2C+Eduard&rft.au=M%C3%BCller%2C+Detlef&rft.au=Burton%2C+Sharon&rft.au=Kolgotin%2C+Alexei&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.eissn=2155-3165&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=31&rft.spage=7252&rft_id=info:doi/10.1364%2FAO.53.007252&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F25402885&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F25402885&rft.externalDocID=25402885 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1559-128X&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1559-128X&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1559-128X&client=summon |