Direct and indirect costs among employees with diabetic retinopathy in the United States

ABSTRACT Objective: To examine, from the employer perspective, the direct (healthcare) and indirect (workloss) costs of employees with diabetic retinopathy (DR) compared to control non-DR employees with diabetes, and within DR subgroups. Methods: Compared annual costs using claims data from 17 large...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Current medical research and opinion Ročník 24; číslo 5; s. 1549 - 1559
Hlavní autori: Lee, Lauren J., Yu, Andrew P., Cahill, Kevin E., Oglesby, Alan K., Tang, Jackson, Qiu, Ying, Birnbaum, Howard G.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: England Informa UK Ltd 01.05.2008
Taylor & Francis
Informa Healthcare
Predmet:
ISSN:0300-7995, 1473-4877, 1473-4877
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Abstract ABSTRACT Objective: To examine, from the employer perspective, the direct (healthcare) and indirect (workloss) costs of employees with diabetic retinopathy (DR) compared to control non-DR employees with diabetes, and within DR subgroups. Methods: Compared annual costs using claims data from 17 large companies (1999-2004). 'DR employees' (n = 2098) had ≥ 1 DR (International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision [ICD‑9]) diagnosis; DR subgroups included employees with diabetic macular edema (DME), proliferative DR (PDR), and employees receiving photo­coagulation or vitrectomy procedures. Descriptive and multivariate tests were performed. Results: DR employee annual direct costs were $18 218 (indirect = $3548) compared to $11 898 (indirect = $2374) for controls (Δ = $2032 (adjusted); p < 0.0001). Costs differences were larger across DR employee subgroups: DME/non-DME ($28 606/$16 363); PDR/non-PDR ($30 135/$13 445; p < 0.0001); DR with/without photocoagulation ($34 539/$16 041; p < 0.0001); and DR with/without vitrectomy ($63 933/$17 239; p < 0.0001). Limitations: This study examined the incremental costs of treating DR employees, which may be higher than the incremental costs of DR itself. Some measures of diabetes severity (e.g., duration of diabetes) were not available in the claims data, and were therefore not included in the multivariate models. The cost of photocoagulation and vitrectomy procedures pertain to individuals who underwent these procedures, and not the cost of the procedures themselves. Conclusion: DR employees had significantly higher costs than controls, and larger differences existed within DR subgroups. Indirect costs accounted for about 20% of total cost.
AbstractList ABSTRACT Objective: To examine, from the employer perspective, the direct (healthcare) and indirect (workloss) costs of employees with diabetic retinopathy (DR) compared to control non-DR employees with diabetes, and within DR subgroups. Methods: Compared annual costs using claims data from 17 large companies (1999-2004). 'DR employees' (n = 2098) had ≥ 1 DR (International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision [ICD‑9]) diagnosis; DR subgroups included employees with diabetic macular edema (DME), proliferative DR (PDR), and employees receiving photo­coagulation or vitrectomy procedures. Descriptive and multivariate tests were performed. Results: DR employee annual direct costs were $18 218 (indirect = $3548) compared to $11 898 (indirect = $2374) for controls (Δ = $2032 (adjusted); p < 0.0001). Costs differences were larger across DR employee subgroups: DME/non-DME ($28 606/$16 363); PDR/non-PDR ($30 135/$13 445; p < 0.0001); DR with/without photocoagulation ($34 539/$16 041; p < 0.0001); and DR with/without vitrectomy ($63 933/$17 239; p < 0.0001). Limitations: This study examined the incremental costs of treating DR employees, which may be higher than the incremental costs of DR itself. Some measures of diabetes severity (e.g., duration of diabetes) were not available in the claims data, and were therefore not included in the multivariate models. The cost of photocoagulation and vitrectomy procedures pertain to individuals who underwent these procedures, and not the cost of the procedures themselves. Conclusion: DR employees had significantly higher costs than controls, and larger differences existed within DR subgroups. Indirect costs accounted for about 20% of total cost.
Objective: To examine, from the employer perspective, the direct (healthcare) and indirect (workloss) costs of employees with diabetic retinopathy (DR) compared to control non-DR employees with diabetes, and within DR subgroups. Methods: Compared annual costs using claims data from 17 large companies (1999-2004). 'DR employees' (n = 2098) had ≥ 1 DR (International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision [ICD-9]) diagnosis; DR subgroups included employees with diabetic macular edema (DME), proliferative DR (PDR), and employees receiving photo­coagulation or vitrectomy procedures. Descriptive and multivariate tests were performed. Results: DR employee annual direct costs were $18 218 (indirect = $3548) compared to $11 898 (indirect = $2374) for controls (Δ = $2032 (adjusted); p < 0.0001). Costs differences were larger across DR employee subgroups: DME/non-DME ($28 606/$16 363); PDR/non-PDR ($30 135/$13 445; p < 0.0001); DR with/without photocoagulation ($34 539/$16 041; p < 0.0001); and DR with/without vitrectomy ($63 933/$17 239; p < 0.0001). Limitations: This study examined the incremental costs of treating DR employees, which may be higher than the incremental costs of DR itself. Some measures of diabetes severity (e.g., duration of diabetes) were not available in the claims data, and were therefore not included in the multivariate models. The cost of photocoagulation and vitrectomy procedures pertain to individuals who underwent these procedures, and not the cost of the procedures themselves. Conclusion: DR employees had significantly higher costs than controls, and larger differences existed within DR subgroups. Indirect costs accounted for about 20% of total cost.
To examine, from the employer perspective, the direct (healthcare) and indirect (workloss) costs of employees with diabetic retinopathy (DR) compared to control non-DR employees with diabetes, and within DR subgroups. Compared annual costs using claims data from 17 large companies (1999-2004). 'DR employees' (n = 2098) had >or= 1 DR (International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision [ICD-9]) diagnosis; DR subgroups included employees with diabetic macular edema (DME), proliferative DR (PDR), and employees receiving photocoagulation or vitrectomy procedures. Descriptive and multivariate tests were performed. DR employee annual direct costs were $18,218 (indirect = $3548) compared to $11,898 (indirect = $2374) for controls (Delta = $2032 (adjusted); p < 0.0001). Costs differences were larger across DR employee subgroups: DME/non-DME ($28,606/$16,363); PDR/non-PDR ($30,135/$13,445; p < 0.0001); DR with/without photocoagulation ($34,539/$16,041; p < 0.0001); and DR with/without vitrectomy ($63,933/$17,239; p < 0.0001). This study examined the incremental costs of treating DR employees, which may be higher than the incremental costs of DR itself. Some measures of diabetes severity (e.g., duration of diabetes) were not available in the claims data, and were therefore not included in the multivariate models. The cost of photocoagulation and vitrectomy procedures pertain to individuals who underwent these procedures, and not the cost of the procedures themselves. DR employees had significantly higher costs than controls, and larger differences existed within DR subgroups. Indirect costs accounted for about 20% of total cost.
OBJECTIVE: To examine, from the employer perspective, the direct (healthcare) and indirect (workloss) costs of employees with diabetic retinopathy (DR) compared to control non-DR employees with diabetes, and within DR subgroups. METHODS: Compared annual costs using claims data from 17 large companies (1999-2004). 'DR employees' (n = 2098) had >or= 1 DR (International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision [ICD-9]) diagnosis; DR subgroups included employees with diabetic macular edema (DME), proliferative DR (PDR), and employees receiving photocoagulation or vitrectomy procedures. Descriptive and multivariate tests were performed. RESULTS: DR employee annual direct costs were $18,218 (indirect = $3548) compared to $11,898 (indirect = $2374) for controls (Delta = $2032 (adjusted); p < 0.0001). Costs differences were larger across DR employee subgroups: DME/non-DME ($28,606/$16,363); PDR/non-PDR ($30,135/$13,445; p < 0.0001); DR with/without photocoagulation ($34,539/$16,041; p < 0.0001); and DR with/without vitrectomy ($63,933/$17,239; p < 0.0001). LIMITATIONS: This study examined the incremental costs of treating DR employees, which may be higher than the incremental costs of DR itself. Some measures of diabetes severity (e.g., duration of diabetes) were not available in the claims data, and were therefore not included in the multivariate models. The cost of photocoagulation and vitrectomy procedures pertain to individuals who underwent these procedures, and not the cost of the procedures themselves. CONCLUSION: DR employees had significantly higher costs than controls, and larger differences existed within DR subgroups. Indirect costs accounted for about 20% of total cost.
To examine, from the employer perspective, the direct (healthcare) and indirect (workloss) costs of employees with diabetic retinopathy (DR) compared to control non-DR employees with diabetes, and within DR subgroups.OBJECTIVETo examine, from the employer perspective, the direct (healthcare) and indirect (workloss) costs of employees with diabetic retinopathy (DR) compared to control non-DR employees with diabetes, and within DR subgroups.Compared annual costs using claims data from 17 large companies (1999-2004). 'DR employees' (n = 2098) had >or= 1 DR (International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision [ICD-9]) diagnosis; DR subgroups included employees with diabetic macular edema (DME), proliferative DR (PDR), and employees receiving photocoagulation or vitrectomy procedures. Descriptive and multivariate tests were performed.METHODSCompared annual costs using claims data from 17 large companies (1999-2004). 'DR employees' (n = 2098) had >or= 1 DR (International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision [ICD-9]) diagnosis; DR subgroups included employees with diabetic macular edema (DME), proliferative DR (PDR), and employees receiving photocoagulation or vitrectomy procedures. Descriptive and multivariate tests were performed.DR employee annual direct costs were $18,218 (indirect = $3548) compared to $11,898 (indirect = $2374) for controls (Delta = $2032 (adjusted); p < 0.0001). Costs differences were larger across DR employee subgroups: DME/non-DME ($28,606/$16,363); PDR/non-PDR ($30,135/$13,445; p < 0.0001); DR with/without photocoagulation ($34,539/$16,041; p < 0.0001); and DR with/without vitrectomy ($63,933/$17,239; p < 0.0001).RESULTSDR employee annual direct costs were $18,218 (indirect = $3548) compared to $11,898 (indirect = $2374) for controls (Delta = $2032 (adjusted); p < 0.0001). Costs differences were larger across DR employee subgroups: DME/non-DME ($28,606/$16,363); PDR/non-PDR ($30,135/$13,445; p < 0.0001); DR with/without photocoagulation ($34,539/$16,041; p < 0.0001); and DR with/without vitrectomy ($63,933/$17,239; p < 0.0001).This study examined the incremental costs of treating DR employees, which may be higher than the incremental costs of DR itself. Some measures of diabetes severity (e.g., duration of diabetes) were not available in the claims data, and were therefore not included in the multivariate models. The cost of photocoagulation and vitrectomy procedures pertain to individuals who underwent these procedures, and not the cost of the procedures themselves.LIMITATIONSThis study examined the incremental costs of treating DR employees, which may be higher than the incremental costs of DR itself. Some measures of diabetes severity (e.g., duration of diabetes) were not available in the claims data, and were therefore not included in the multivariate models. The cost of photocoagulation and vitrectomy procedures pertain to individuals who underwent these procedures, and not the cost of the procedures themselves.DR employees had significantly higher costs than controls, and larger differences existed within DR subgroups. Indirect costs accounted for about 20% of total cost.CONCLUSIONDR employees had significantly higher costs than controls, and larger differences existed within DR subgroups. Indirect costs accounted for about 20% of total cost.
Author Qiu, Ying
Birnbaum, Howard G.
Yu, Andrew P.
Tang, Jackson
Lee, Lauren J.
Cahill, Kevin E.
Oglesby, Alan K.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Lauren J.
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Lauren J.
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Andrew P.
  surname: Yu
  fullname: Yu, Andrew P.
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Kevin E.
  surname: Cahill
  fullname: Cahill, Kevin E.
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Alan K.
  surname: Oglesby
  fullname: Oglesby, Alan K.
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Jackson
  surname: Tang
  fullname: Tang, Jackson
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Ying
  surname: Qiu
  fullname: Qiu, Ying
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Howard G.
  surname: Birnbaum
  fullname: Birnbaum, Howard G.
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18416887$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kcFrFTEQh4O02Nfq3ZMED97WJpvdTVZPpdpaKHjQQm9hNpl1U3aTZ5JHef-9Ka9SfNBeEsJ8X5j5zTE58MEjIe84-8S5ak-ZYEz2PVO3dS8FE6_IijdSVI2S8oCsHspVqbdH5DilO8Z4rfr-NTniquGdUnJFbr-6iCZT8JY6b3cPE1JOFJbgf1Nc1nPYIiZ67_JErYMBszM0ltOHNeRpW0SaJ6Q33mW09GeGjOkNORxhTvj28T4hNxfffp1_r65_XF6dn11XpqllrmpjRyHHph8AOonQGmY6QIPKDG3XiZENzELpl_UCFRu4lZ3kxvZjYxkoFCfk4-7fdQx_NpiyXlwyOM_gMWySlkyKpmvrAn7YA-_CJvrSm65LiKpnrSjQ-0doMyxo9Tq6BeJW_wusAGwHmBhSijg-IUw_7ETv76Qo3Z5iXInIBZ8juPkl8ctOdH4McYH7EGerM2znEMcI3rikxQv25__sCWHOk4GIT4M_K_8FyS604Q
CODEN CMROCX
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oftal_2015_11_019
crossref_primary_10_1155_2013_686525
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40273_016_0402_3
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2022_063390
crossref_primary_10_4103_ijo_IJO_1538_20
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2016_12_023
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_diabres_2009_09_023
crossref_primary_10_1080_00325481_2014_994468
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41433_018_0110_7
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0180949
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40618_017_0648_4
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjophth_2025_002218
crossref_primary_10_2147_CEOR_S454185
crossref_primary_10_2337_dc12_2625
crossref_primary_10_1097_01_NPR_0000337201_00188_05
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11892_014_0510_4
crossref_primary_10_1155_2014_939315
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12962_016_0056_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_preteyeres_2023_101220
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10198_016_0773_6
crossref_primary_10_2165_11598130_000000000_00000
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12020_014_0232_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oret_2020_07_004
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41433_021_01745_1
crossref_primary_10_1111_aos_14514
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2020_042484
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcjo_2022_04_002
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11892_015_0599_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oftale_2015_11_006
crossref_primary_10_1111_aos_14912
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_diabres_2021_109182
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1528_1167_2009_02422_x
crossref_primary_10_1185_03007995_2010_482503
crossref_primary_10_2337_dc15_0369
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics14171992
crossref_primary_10_2165_11535570_000000000_00000
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tem_2013_09_005
crossref_primary_10_1017_S0266462313000500
crossref_primary_10_2337_dc22_2527
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13237083
crossref_primary_10_2337_dc14_1036
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_survophthal_2016_01_003
Cites_doi 10.7326/0003-4819-124-1_Part_2-199601011-00017
10.1001/archopht.122.4.477
10.2165/00019053-200321150-00006
10.2337/dc08-9017
10.1007/s00125-002-0859-9
10.2337/diacare.26.8.2300
10.2165/00019053-200422030-00002
10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91020-X
10.1001/archopht.124.12.1754
10.1016/S0039-6257(02)00388-0
10.2337/diacare.25.1.23
10.1001/archopht.122.4.552
10.2337/diacare.8.4.316
10.2337/diacare.27.10.2540
10.2165/00019053-200422020-00003
10.2337/dc06-0062
10.2337/diacare.27.5.1047
10.1007/s00125-002-0990-7
10.1001/archopht.1985.01050120030015
10.2337/diacare.26.9.2653
10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2008 Informa UK Ltd. All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2008
Copyright Librapharm May 2008
Copyright_xml – notice: 2008 Informa UK Ltd. All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2008
– notice: Copyright Librapharm May 2008
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7X7
7XB
88E
88I
8AF
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
K9.
M0S
M1P
M2P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
Q9U
S0X
7X8
DOI 10.1185/030079908X297303
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Science Database (Alumni Edition)
STEM Database
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database
Science Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic (retired)
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central Basic
SIRS Editorial
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
SIRS Editorial
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest AP Science
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Science Journals (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest Science Journals
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

MEDLINE
ProQuest Central Student
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1473-4877
EndPage 1559
ExternalDocumentID 1500359751
18416887
10_1185_030079908X297303
11173138
Genre Research Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GeographicLocations United States
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United States
GroupedDBID ---
.55
.GJ
00X
03L
08R
0BK
0R~
29F
34G
39C
3V.
4.4
53G
5GY
5RE
6J9
6PF
7X7
88E
88I
8AF
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8R4
8R5
AAJNR
AALIY
AALUX
AAMIU
AAPUL
AAPXX
AAQRR
AAUGY
AAWTL
ABBAB
ABBKH
ABEIZ
ABIVO
ABLJU
ABLKL
ABOCM
ABPTK
ABUPF
ABUWG
ABWCV
ABZEW
ACENM
ACFUF
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGOD
ACKZS
ACLSK
ADBBV
ADCVX
ADFCX
ADFOM
ADFZZ
ADRBQ
AECIN
AEIIZ
AENEX
AEOZL
AEYQI
AFKRA
AFLEI
AFWLO
AGDLA
AGFJD
AGRBW
AGYJP
AHMBA
AIJEM
AIRBT
AJVHN
AKBVH
ALIIL
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALQZU
AMDAE
AZQEC
BABNJ
BENPR
BLEHA
BOHLJ
BPHCQ
BRMBE
BVXVI
CAG
CCCUG
COF
CS3
CYYVM
CZDIS
DKSSO
DRXRE
DU5
DWQXO
DWTOO
EBS
EJD
F5P
FYUFA
GNUQQ
H13
HCIFZ
HZ~
IPNFZ
J5H
JENTW
KRBQP
KSSTO
KWAYT
KYCEM
L7B
LJTGL
M1P
M2P
M2Q
M44
M4Z
O9-
P2P
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PROAC
PSQYO
Q2X
QQXMO
RIG
RNANH
RVRKI
RWL
S0X
SJN
TAE
TFDNU
TFL
TFW
UEQFS
UKHRP
V1S
X7M
ZGI
~1N
AAGDL
AAJKZ
ABJNI
ABLIJ
ABWVI
ABXYU
ACIEZ
AFRVT
ALYBC
AQTUD
CCPQU
HMCUK
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PPXIY
TASJS
TBQAZ
TDBHL
TERGH
TUROJ
AAORF
AAYXX
ACOPL
ACYZI
AFFHD
CITATION
EMOBN
NUSFT
ADYSH
ALIPV
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7XB
8FK
K9.
PKEHL
Q9U
7X8
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-2cdf37f49baa67ea5c0c6aece8cb5663f0b0da184093e80b1d7671cd9f4d0a8e3
IEDL.DBID TFW
ISICitedReferencesCount 60
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000256189400034&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0300-7995
1473-4877
IngestDate Thu Sep 04 19:23:23 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 14:55:09 EST 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:33:14 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 06:36:47 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 21:59:23 EST 2025
Mon Oct 20 23:36:12 EDT 2025
Wed Jun 21 08:14:44 EDT 2023
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c427t-2cdf37f49baa67ea5c0c6aece8cb5663f0b0da184093e80b1d7671cd9f4d0a8e3
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-General Information-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
PMID 18416887
PQID 207989053
PQPubID 48040
PageCount 11
ParticipantIDs crossref_primary_10_1185_030079908X297303
crossref_citationtrail_10_1185_030079908X297303
proquest_journals_207989053
informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1185_030079908X297303
proquest_miscellaneous_70734652
pubmed_primary_18416887
informahealthcare_journals_10_1185_030079908X297303
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2008-May
5/1/2008
2008-05-00
20080501
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2008-05-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2008
  text: 2008-May
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: Newbury
PublicationTitle Current medical research and opinion
PublicationTitleAlternate Curr Med Res Opin
PublicationYear 2008
Publisher Informa UK Ltd
Taylor & Francis
Informa Healthcare
Publisher_xml – name: Informa UK Ltd
– name: Taylor & Francis
– name: Informa Healthcare
References von Ferber L (CIT0025) 2007; 115
CIT0010
CIT0020
CIT0001
CIT0012
CIT0023
CIT0011
CIT0022
Control Diabetes (CIT0014) 1993; 329
CIT0003
CIT0013
CIT0024
CIT0005
CIT0016
CIT0004
CIT0026
CIT0007
CIT0018
CIT0006
CIT0017
CIT0009
CIT0008
CIT0019
References_xml – ident: CIT0019
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-124-1_Part_2-199601011-00017
– ident: CIT0012
  doi: 10.1001/archopht.122.4.477
– ident: CIT0006
  doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321150-00006
– ident: CIT0007
  doi: 10.2337/dc08-9017
– ident: CIT0024
  doi: 10.1007/s00125-002-0859-9
– ident: CIT0005
  doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.8.2300
– ident: CIT0004
  doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422030-00002
– ident: CIT0010
  doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91020-X
– ident: CIT0022
  doi: 10.1001/archopht.124.12.1754
– volume: 329
  start-page: 977
  year: 1993
  ident: CIT0014
  publication-title: The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med
– ident: CIT0020
  doi: 10.1016/S0039-6257(02)00388-0
– ident: CIT0008
  doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.1.23
– ident: CIT0011
  doi: 10.1001/archopht.122.4.552
– ident: CIT0016
  doi: 10.2337/diacare.8.4.316
– ident: CIT0009
  doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.10.2540
– ident: CIT0026
  doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422020-00003
– ident: CIT0001
  doi: 10.2337/dc06-0062
– ident: CIT0003
  doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.5.1047
– volume: 115
  start-page: 97
  year: 2007
  ident: CIT0025
  publication-title: Medical costs of diabetic complications total costs and excess costs by age and type of treatment results of the Germon CoDiM Study. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes
– ident: CIT0017
  doi: 10.1007/s00125-002-0990-7
– ident: CIT0018
  doi: 10.1001/archopht.1985.01050120030015
– ident: CIT0013
  doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.9.2653
– ident: CIT0023
  doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8
SSID ssj0012899
Score 2.11382
Snippet ABSTRACT Objective: To examine, from the employer perspective, the direct (healthcare) and indirect (workloss) costs of employees with diabetic retinopathy...
Objective: To examine, from the employer perspective, the direct (healthcare) and indirect (workloss) costs of employees with diabetic retinopathy (DR)...
To examine, from the employer perspective, the direct (healthcare) and indirect (workloss) costs of employees with diabetic retinopathy (DR) compared to...
OBJECTIVE: To examine, from the employer perspective, the direct (healthcare) and indirect (workloss) costs of employees with diabetic retinopathy (DR)...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
informaworld
informahealthcare
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 1549
SubjectTerms Adult
Age Factors
Case-Control Studies
Chi-Square Distribution
Cost of Illness
Diabetic macular edema
Diabetic retinopathy
Diabetic Retinopathy - diagnosis
Diabetic Retinopathy - economics
Diabetic Retinopathy - therapy
Direct Service Costs - statistics & numerical data
Employer Health Costs - statistics & numerical data
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Female
Health Benefit Plans, Employee - economics
Health care costs
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Photocoagulation
Reference Values
Risk Assessment
Severity of Illness Index
Sex Factors
Sick Leave - economics
Sick Leave - statistics & numerical data
Statistics, Nonparametric
United States
Vitrectomy
Workers' Compensation - economics
Workers' Compensation - statistics & numerical data
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: ProQuest Central
  dbid: BENPR
  link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LT4QwEJ7oaowX34_12YMXD8QCBcrJqNF4cWOMJnsjpS3RxMAqaOK_t0MLGo178UhhIM1M5818AEe-Xxg7JpWXYwsNk6rwOBfai03MnAZa-krTFmwiGY34eJzeut6c2rVVdjqxVdSqkpgjx0xIylMjMqeTFw9Bo7C46hA0ZmEOB5WxAcydX45u7_oyAkYTtoxAPZx81tUpeXSCa2aJ8jGiN3WYWc4urbippY99D9aPSaZ_-6OtXbpa_ueOVmDJOaTkzErQKszocg0WblzJfR3GVikSUSqC9e32QlZ1U5MWqIhohxlcE8zpEpvMfZIEf48sK0Q8_jCExDiaxDq4xDq4G_BwdXl_ce05OAZPsiBpvMAwMkwKluZCxIkWkaQyFlpqLnPjFIYFzakSbcQYak5zXyVx4kuVFkxRwXW4CYOyKvU2kDimqTSBWmG8DcYilaMfKIooyOOcyYgO4aRjRibdrHKEzHjO2piFR9lP9g3huKeY2DkdU54Nf_E3c0e3nkLFvktA1rQZlcLCn2Th32S7Hfe_vtGzfgiH_V1zrrFYI0pdvdVZYnQvi6NgCFtWvL62hZViYxt2pr55FxZtawv2Zu7BoHl90_swL9-bp_r1wB2UT3zjF_s
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Direct and indirect costs among employees with diabetic retinopathy in the United States
URI https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1185/030079908X297303
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18416887
https://www.proquest.com/docview/207989053
https://www.proquest.com/docview/70734652
Volume 24
WOSCitedRecordID wos000256189400034&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1473-4877
  dateEnd: 20081231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0012899
  issn: 0300-7995
  databaseCode: 7X7
  dateStart: 19980101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Central
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1473-4877
  dateEnd: 20081231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0012899
  issn: 0300-7995
  databaseCode: BENPR
  dateStart: 19980101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Science Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1473-4877
  dateEnd: 20081231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0012899
  issn: 0300-7995
  databaseCode: M2P
  dateStart: 19980101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/sciencejournals
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVAWR
  databaseName: Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1473-4877
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0012899
  issn: 0300-7995
  databaseCode: TFW
  dateStart: 19720101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.tandfonline.com
  providerName: Taylor & Francis
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1NT9wwEB1RWlVcKP1kS7v1gUsPEU7ixI7US1ux6oXVqgKRW2Q7topUZSsSkPj3zNjZpaXAob1EsmIncTwev_GM5wHsp6nHdcy2iaEQGmFbnyilXVKizVxlzqat44FsQs7nqq6rxQZ8Wp2FobBKsqF9TBQRdDVNbm1GBhJVHKBccolaVNVEvBRSfSKoJ_E-np2uXQhkSUQXAk8o69nKR3nHA_5Yk3bGjKU_1vFXt7KY3o9Fw5o0e_Z_vdmB7RGLss9ReJ7DhutewNOj0dv-EuqoDxk-mpFrOxTssh96FjiKmBvpgntG27ks7uOeWUYnI7slkR1fYUOGGJNFbMsitn0FJ7PD46_fkpGJIbEik0OS4Rjm0ovKaF1KpwvLbamddcoaxIO554a3OhiLuVPcpK0sZWrbyouWa-Xy17DZLTu3C6wseWXRRvMINIQoWkMQUPsiM6URtuATOFiNRWPHNOXElvGzCeaKKprbP2wCH9ctfsUUHQ_Uzf8a3mactf0DrcTvAtAMYTPFR-aTJr-_2d5KUG7ekWEVVaHqm8CH9V2c0uSn0Z1bXvSNRLUryiKbwJsoXTfdIicxLgtv_-2D9mArhrtQvOY72BzOL9x7eGIvh7P-fAqPZC3DVU3h8ZfD-eI7lo6yxTRMrGvCIRsG
linkProvider Taylor & Francis
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1LT9wwEB5RitpeWuhzCwUf6KGHCCdxEudQVVUBgWBXHKi0t9SxHRWpSigJrfhR_Y-dsZNQUbE3DhzzcBLHn8fz8nwA22FY4TqmTVBSCo3QpgqkVDZI0WbOI6tDY7kjm8hmMzmf5ydL8GfYC0NplYNMdILaNJp85OQJyWWOkPl0_jMg0igKrg4MGh4VR_bqN1ps7cfDXRze91G0v3f65SDoSQUCLaKsCyL8nDirRF4qlWZWJZrrVFltpS5RtYkrXnKjnN0TW8nL0GRpFmqTV8JwJW2Mz30ADwUaQjStptHJGLQg28UHLXhAddaGqKhMdugcnuJyTlxRA0NXvwqu9jVSv48ZXzfqpt6u_bpVcP_ZPft_q_C0V7fZZz8_1mDJ1s_h0bRPKHgBcy_ymaoNo-i9O9BN27XM0TAx2zMit4w81sy7qs80o82fdUN8zlfYkKEazbz6zrz6_hK-3km_XsFy3dT2DbA05blGM7RCXUqIxJSk5aoqicq0FDrhE9gZBr_QfSV2IgT5UTiLTCbFTbhM4MPY4txXIVlwb_wfnopeMLULWol_EVd0zl9UeXKXIr692fqAtut3jFCbwNZ4FaUWhaJUbZvLtshw9og0iSbw2sP5ulsUB8eV7-3CJ2_B44PT6XFxfDg7WocnPomHslA3YLm7uLTvYEX_6s7ai003RRl8u2tM_wVtuHaP
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V3LbtQwFL0qBVXd0PIqQ4F6AQsW0TiJnTgLVCHKiKp0NAuQZhccP0SlKmmbFNRP4-_wjZ0UFXV2XbCMEydxcuz79D0Ab-LYOjmmdFRhCg1T2kZCSBNlzmYuEqNibWhPNpHP52K5LBZr8HvYC4NplcOa2C_UulHoI0dPSCEKB5mpDVkRi4PZ_tl5hARSGGgd2DQ8Qo7M1S9nvbXvDw_cr36bJLNPXz9-jgLBQKRYkndR4l4tzS0rKimz3EiuqMqkUUaoyqk5qaUV1bK3gVIjaBXrPMtjpQvLNJXCpO6-9-B-zjjHbMLjZDEGMNCO8QEMGmHNtSFCKvgU21wTFUvkjRrYuoJE3A71Un-M2V83aqjergn3EnG29R9_y214GNRw8sHPm0ewZurHsHEcEg2ewNKLAiJrTTCq3x-opu1a0tMzEROYkluCnmziXdgniuCm0LpBnucr15E49Zp4tZ54tf4pfLuTcT2D9bqpzXMgWUYL5cxT63QsxriuUPuVlidVVjHF6QSmAxBKFSq0I1HIadlbaoKXN6EzgXdjjzNfnWTFtek_2CrDgtWu6MX-Rl_Z9X4k60lfyvT2brsD8q6fMcJuAnvjWbeaYYhK1qa5bMvcSRyW8WQCOx7a18PC-LiTiC9W3nkPNhyUyy-H86Nd2PS5PZic-hLWu4tL8woeqJ_dSXvxup-tBL7fNaT_AGOKf1U
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Direct+and+indirect+costs+among+employees+with+diabetic+retinopathy+in+the+United+States&rft.jtitle=Current+medical+research+and+opinion&rft.au=Lee%2C+Lauren+J&rft.au=Yu%2C+Andrew+P&rft.au=Cahill%2C+Kevin+E&rft.au=Oglesby%2C+Alan+K&rft.date=2008-05-01&rft.issn=1473-4877&rft.eissn=1473-4877&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1549&rft_id=info:doi/10.1185%2F030079908X297303&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0300-7995&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0300-7995&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0300-7995&client=summon