Capturing the subject-specific quality of mathematics instruction: How do expert judgments relate to students’ assessments of the quality of their own learning and understanding?
Based on an opportunity-use model of instructional quality, this study investigates the extent to which subject-specific instructional quality rated by experts is reflected in students’ assessments of their own learning and understanding, and how students’ perceptions predict their achievement. The...
Uložené v:
| Vydané v: | ZDM Ročník 56; číslo 5; s. 893 - 905 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autori: | , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | English |
| Vydavateľské údaje: |
Berlin/Heidelberg
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
01.10.2024
Springer Nature B.V |
| Predmet: | |
| ISSN: | 1863-9690, 1863-9704 |
| On-line prístup: | Získať plný text |
| Tagy: |
Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
|
| Abstract | Based on an opportunity-use model of instructional quality, this study investigates the extent to which subject-specific instructional quality rated by experts is reflected in students’ assessments of their own learning and understanding, and how students’ perceptions predict their achievement. The analyses used data from a German-Swiss sample of 36 classes with around 900 lower secondary students, obtained as part of the so-called “Pythagoras study” in the school year 2002/2003. The teachers were instructed to introduce the Pythagorean theorem in three lessons, which were videotaped. Using the videos, the experts assessed the instruction quality with respect to the goal of promoting a deep understanding of the theorem. The students completed the questionnaires assessing their understanding of the content, their learning process, and the general comprehension orientation of the teacher. The results showed significant and moderate correlations on the class level between expert-rated subject-specific teaching quality and students’ perceptions of their own learning and understanding, as well as of the teacher’s general comprehension orientation. Multilevel models revealed that subject-specific expert ratings are reflected in individual students’ perceptions of their own learning and understanding. Student perceptions were also associated with achievement gains. The results suggest that the assessment of quality by students and experts is more closely linked if a distinction is made between the quality of the learning opportunities offered and their use and if subject-specific criteria are used instead of generic criteria. This study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the validity of student perspective in assessing instructional quality. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Based on an opportunity-use model of instructional quality, this study investigates the extent to which subject-specific instructional quality rated by experts is reflected in students’ assessments of their own learning and understanding, and how students’ perceptions predict their achievement. The analyses used data from a German-Swiss sample of 36 classes with around 900 lower secondary students, obtained as part of the so-called “Pythagoras study” in the school year 2002/2003. The teachers were instructed to introduce the Pythagorean theorem in three lessons, which were videotaped. Using the videos, the experts assessed the instruction quality with respect to the goal of promoting a deep understanding of the theorem. The students completed the questionnaires assessing their understanding of the content, their learning process, and the general comprehension orientation of the teacher. The results showed significant and moderate correlations on the class level between expert-rated subject-specific teaching quality and students’ perceptions of their own learning and understanding, as well as of the teacher’s general comprehension orientation. Multilevel models revealed that subject-specific expert ratings are reflected in individual students’ perceptions of their own learning and understanding. Student perceptions were also associated with achievement gains. The results suggest that the assessment of quality by students and experts is more closely linked if a distinction is made between the quality of the learning opportunities offered and their use and if subject-specific criteria are used instead of generic criteria. This study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the validity of student perspective in assessing instructional quality. Based on an opportunity-use model of instructional quality, this study investigates the extent to which subject-specific instructional quality rated by experts is reflected in students' assessments of their own learning and understanding, and how students' perceptions predict their achievement. The analyses used data from a German-Swiss sample of 36 classes with around 900 lower secondary students, obtained as part of the so-called "Pythagoras study" in the school year 2002/2003. The teachers were instructed to introduce the Pythagorean theorem in three lessons, which were videotaped. Using the videos, the experts assessed the instruction quality with respect to the goal of promoting a deep understanding of the theorem. The students completed the questionnaires assessing their understanding of the content, their learning process, and the general comprehension orientation of the teacher. The results showed significant and moderate correlations on the class level between expert-rated subject-specific teaching quality and students' perceptions of their own learning and understanding, as well as of the teacher's general comprehension orientation. Multilevel models revealed that subject-specific expert ratings are reflected in individual students' perceptions of their own learning and understanding. Student perceptions were also associated with achievement gains. The results suggest that the assessment of quality by students and experts is more closely linked if a distinction is made between the quality of the learning opportunities offered and their use and if subject-specific criteria are used instead of generic criteria. This study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the validity of student perspective in assessing instructional quality. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11858-024-01561-3. Based on an opportunity-use model of instructional quality, this study investigates the extent to which subject-specific instructional quality rated by experts is reflected in students' assessments of their own learning and understanding, and how students' perceptions predict their achievement. The analyses used data from a German-Swiss sample of 36 classes with around 900 lower secondary students, obtained as part of the so-called "Pythagoras study" in the school year 2002/2003. The teachers were instructed to introduce the Pythagorean theorem in three lessons, which were videotaped. Using the videos, the experts assessed the instruction quality with respect to the goal of promoting a deep understanding of the theorem. The students completed the questionnaires assessing their understanding of the content, their learning process, and the general comprehension orientation of the teacher. The results showed significant and moderate correlations on the class level between expert-rated subject-specific teaching quality and students' perceptions of their own learning and understanding, as well as of the teacher's general comprehension orientation. Multilevel models revealed that subject-specific expert ratings are reflected in individual students' perceptions of their own learning and understanding. Student perceptions were also associated with achievement gains. The results suggest that the assessment of quality by students and experts is more closely linked if a distinction is made between the quality of the learning opportunities offered and their use and if subject-specific criteria are used instead of generic criteria. This study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the validity of student perspective in assessing instructional quality.Based on an opportunity-use model of instructional quality, this study investigates the extent to which subject-specific instructional quality rated by experts is reflected in students' assessments of their own learning and understanding, and how students' perceptions predict their achievement. The analyses used data from a German-Swiss sample of 36 classes with around 900 lower secondary students, obtained as part of the so-called "Pythagoras study" in the school year 2002/2003. The teachers were instructed to introduce the Pythagorean theorem in three lessons, which were videotaped. Using the videos, the experts assessed the instruction quality with respect to the goal of promoting a deep understanding of the theorem. The students completed the questionnaires assessing their understanding of the content, their learning process, and the general comprehension orientation of the teacher. The results showed significant and moderate correlations on the class level between expert-rated subject-specific teaching quality and students' perceptions of their own learning and understanding, as well as of the teacher's general comprehension orientation. Multilevel models revealed that subject-specific expert ratings are reflected in individual students' perceptions of their own learning and understanding. Student perceptions were also associated with achievement gains. The results suggest that the assessment of quality by students and experts is more closely linked if a distinction is made between the quality of the learning opportunities offered and their use and if subject-specific criteria are used instead of generic criteria. This study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the validity of student perspective in assessing instructional quality.The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11858-024-01561-3.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11858-024-01561-3. |
| Author | Pauli, Christine Reusser, Kurt Lipowsky, Frank |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Christine orcidid: 0000-0003-2095-9211 surname: Pauli fullname: Pauli, Christine email: christine.pauli@unifr.ch organization: University of Fribourg – sequence: 2 givenname: Frank surname: Lipowsky fullname: Lipowsky, Frank organization: University of Kassel – sequence: 3 givenname: Kurt surname: Reusser fullname: Reusser, Kurt organization: University of Zurich |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39399860$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9Ustu1TAUjFARfcAPsECW2LAJ-BUnZlOhK6BIldjA2nKck1tf5dqpH5Tu-A3-gy_iS3BIWwoLNvbx8ZyZsTzH1YHzDqrqKcEvCcbtq0hI13Q1przGpBGkZg-qI9IJVssW84PbWkh8WB3HuMOYCsHko-qQSSZlJ_BR9WOj55SDdVuULgDF3O_ApDrOYOxoDbrMerLpGvkR7XVBlMWaiKyLKWSTrHev0Zm_QoNH8HWGkNAuD9s9uBRRgEknQMmjmPKwtH5--450jBDjiiisi-o9kXK0AfkrhybQwS2-tBtQdgOEmEpZOqePq4ejniI8udlPqs_v3n7anNXnH99_2Lw5rw2nItWatJIKMEPX9Bz3tJemNYRiMxLaaMoHKTrOOAPBxMhM2w2cmrY3YEjT0Z6xk-p05Z1zv4fBFM9BT2oOdq_DtfLaqr9vnL1QW_9FEcKFLOyF4cUNQ_CXGWJSexsNTJN24HNUjBDBWNfQRez5P9Cdz8GV9y2oRmCCOS-oZ_ct3Xm5_dECoCvABB9jgPEOQrBaYqPW2KgSG_U7NmrRZutQnJcoQPij_Z-pX07vyvE |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101303 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00110 10.3262/ZPB2001255 10.1177/27527263231210322 10.1007/s10763-017-9814-6 10.3389/feduc.2022.969212 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01550 10.3102/0002831216671864 10.25656/01:3130 10.1007/BF02652801 10.1037/13274-018 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01245.x 10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5_6 10.25656/01:3107 10.1024/1010-0652/a000359 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.03.003 10.1007/s13138-017-0122-z 10.1007/s13138-021-00190-7 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.12.001 10.1023/A:1011402608575 10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101274 10.1007/s11858-018-0917-5 10.1007/s11858-017-0908-y 10.1007/s11858-018-0914-8 10.1007/s10984-006-9015-7 10.1007/s11858-018-0946-0 10.3262/ZPB2001138 10.1080/00461520.2014.965823 10.1007/s10763-023-10389-4 10.1007/s42010-021-00101-2 10.25656/01:3106 10.25656/01:13570 10.1007/978-3-030-75150-0_7 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101652 10.5951/jresematheduc.2019.0005 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.02.001 10.1007/s11858-019-01062-8 10.1007/s42010-022-00144-z 10.1007/s11858-018-0918-4 10.1007/978-3-031-25613-4_3 10.3102/00028312030003523 10.1007/s11858-016-0765-0 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.001 10.1007/s42010-021-00141-8 10.1007/s42010-021-00116-9 10.1111/jora.12153 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.11.001 10.1086/461632 10.1024/1010-0652.19.3.119 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | The Author(s) 2024 The Author(s) 2024. The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. The Author(s) 2024 2024 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2024 – notice: The Author(s) 2024. – notice: The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: The Author(s) 2024 2024 |
| DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION NPM 0-V 3V. 7XB 88B 8FE 8FG 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AHOVV ALSLI ARAPS AZQEC BENPR BGLVJ CCPQU CJNVE DWQXO GNUQQ HCIFZ JQ2 K7- M0P P62 PHGZM PHGZT PKEHL PQEDU PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7X8 5PM |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11858-024-01561-3 |
| DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals CrossRef PubMed ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection ProQuest Central (Corporate) ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Education Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Education Research Index Social Science Premium Collection Advanced Technologies & Computer Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials Download PDF from ProQuest Central Technology collection ProQuest One Education Collection ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Computer Science Collection Computer Science Database Education Database ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) One Education ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic (retired) ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Basic MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed ProQuest One Education Computer Science Database ProQuest Central Student Technology Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Computer Science Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Central (New) Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Social Science Premium Collection Education Collection ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Education Journals ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Education Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic (New) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | ProQuest One Education CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Education Mathematics |
| EISSN | 1863-9704 |
| EndPage | 905 |
| ExternalDocumentID | PMC11469968 39399860 10_1007_s11858_024_01561_3 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft grantid: KL 1057/1-2 funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001659 – fundername: Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung grantid: 1114-63564.00/1 funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001711 – fundername: University of Fribourg |
| GroupedDBID | -5C -5G -BR -EM -Y2 -~C .VR 06D 0R~ 0VY 123 1N0 203 29R 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2KM 2LR 2VQ 2~H 30V 4.4 406 408 40D 40E 5VS 67Z 6NX 8TC 8UJ 95- 95. 95~ 96X AAAVM AABHQ AACDK AAHNG AAIAL AAJBT AAJKR AANZL AARHV AARTL AASML AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO AAYZH ABAKF ABDZT ABECU ABFTV ABHLI ABHQN ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABMNI ABMQK ABNWP ABQBU ABSXP ABTEG ABTHY ABTKH ABTMW ABULA ABUWG ABWNU ABXPI ACAOD ACBXY ACDTI ACGFS ACHSB ACHXU ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACOKC ACOMO ACPIV ACSNA ACZOJ ADHIR ADINQ ADKNI ADKPE ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADZKW AEBTG AEFQL AEGAL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEKMD AEMSY AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AETLH AEVLU AEXYK AFGCZ AFKRA AFLOW AFQWF AFWTZ AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGJBK AGMZJ AGQEE AGQMX AGRTI AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHACP AHAVH AHBYD AHSBF AHYZX AIAKS AIGIU AIIXL AILAN AITGF AJBLW AJRNO AJZVZ ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALSLI ALWAN AMKLP AMXSW AOCGG ARAPS ARMRJ AXYYD AYQZM AZQEC B-. BA0 BDATZ BENPR BGLVJ BGNMA C6C CAG CCPQU CJNVE COF CS3 CSCUP DDRTE DNIVK DPUIP DWQXO EBLON EBS EIOEI EJD ESBYG FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FWDCC GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNUQQ GNWQR GQ6 GQ7 H13 HCIFZ HF~ HG5 HG6 HMJXF HRMNR HZ~ IJ- IKXTQ ITM IWAJR IZQ I~X I~Z J-C J0Z JBSCW JZLTJ K7- KDC KOV LLZTM M0P M4Y MA- N9A NB0 NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O9- O93 O9G O9J OAM OK1 P9Q PF0 PQEDU PT4 QOS R89 R9I REM RIG ROL RPX RSV S16 S1Z S27 S3B SAP SDH SDM SHS SHX SISQX SJYHP SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW STPWE SZN T13 TSG TSK TSV TUC U2A UG4 UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW W48 YLTOR Z45 ZMTXR AAPKM AAYXX ABBRH ABDBE ABRTQ AFDZB AFFHD AHPBZ ATHPR AYFIA CITATION PHGZM PHGZT PQGLB NPM 0-V 3V. 7XB 8FE 8FG 8FK AHOVV JQ2 P62 PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7X8 PUEGO 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-a17926ecd85b40b2b9c7c120cf125a24d9684343e636f3c78d42c7bcec1582b33 |
| IEDL.DBID | M0P |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 0 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001190038800001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1863-9690 |
| IngestDate | Tue Nov 04 02:05:54 EST 2025 Fri Sep 05 08:39:10 EDT 2025 Wed Nov 05 09:10:03 EST 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:56:00 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 03:25:57 EST 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:37:36 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 5 |
| Keywords | Students’ perceptions of their own learning process Mathematics instruction Subject-specific teaching quality Opportunity-use models |
| Language | English |
| License | The Author(s) 2024. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c426t-a17926ecd85b40b2b9c7c120cf125a24d9684343e636f3c78d42c7bcec1582b33 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-2095-9211 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11858-024-01561-3 |
| PMID | 39399860 |
| PQID | 3115601044 |
| PQPubID | 6623256 |
| PageCount | 13 |
| ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11469968 proquest_miscellaneous_3116338523 proquest_journals_3115601044 pubmed_primary_39399860 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11858_024_01561_3 springer_journals_10_1007_s11858_024_01561_3 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2024-10-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-10-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2024 text: 2024-10-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | Berlin/Heidelberg |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Berlin/Heidelberg – name: Germany – name: Heidelberg |
| PublicationTitle | ZDM |
| PublicationTitleAbbrev | ZDM Mathematics Education |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | ZDM |
| PublicationYear | 2024 |
| Publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg Springer Nature B.V |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Springer Berlin Heidelberg – name: Springer Nature B.V |
| References | WuMLAdamsRJWilsonMRConQuest: Multi-aspect test software [computer program]1997Australian Council for Educational Research WangM-TEcclesJSMultilevel predictors of math classroom climate: A comparison study of student and teacher perceptionsJournal of Research on Adolescence201626361763410.1111/jora.12153 KoedingerKRCorbettATPerfettiCThe Knowledge-Learning-Instruction (KLI) framework: Bridging the science-practice chasm to enhance robust student learningCognitive Science201236575779810.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01245.x Wagner, W., Göllner, R., Helmke, A., Trautwein, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2013). Construct validity of student perceptions of instructional quality is high, but not perfect: Dimensionality and generalizability of domain-independent assessments. Learning and Instruction, 28(0), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.03.003 PredigerSErathKQuabeckKStahnkeREffects of interaction qualities beyond task quality: Disentangling instructional support and cognitive demandsInternational Journal of Science and Mathematics Education202310.1007/s10763-023-10389-4 Praetorius, A.-K., Klieme, E., Herbert, B., & Pinger, P. (2018). Generic dimensions of teaching quality: the German framework of Three Basic Dimensions. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 50(3), 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0918-4 CaiJMorrisAHohenseeCHwangSRobisonVCirilloMKramerSLHiebertJBakkerAMaximizing the quality of learning opportunities for every studentJournal for Research in Mathematics Education2020511122510.5951/jresematheduc.2019.0005 Scherer, R., & Gustafsson, J.-E. (2015). Student assessment of teaching as a source of Information about aspects of teaching quality in multiple subject domains: An application of multilevel bifactor structural equation modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01550 Schlesinger, L., & Jentsch, A. (2016). Theoretical and methodological challenges in measuring instructional quality in mathematics education using classroom observations. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 48(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0765-0 Clausen, M. (2002). Unterrichtsqualität: Eine Frage der Perspektive? Empirische Analysen zur Übereinstimmung, Konstrukt- und Kriteriumsvalidität [Instructional quality: A matter of perspective?]. Waxmann. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2018). Video analyses for research and professional development: the teaching for robust understanding (TRU) framework. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 50(3), 491–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0908-y RaudenbushSWRowanBCheongYFHigher order instructional goals in secondary school: Class, teacher and school influencesAmerican Educational Research Journal199330352355310.3102/00028312030003523 Aebli, H. (1983). Zwölf Grundformen des Lehrens [Twelve basic forms of teaching]. Klett-Cotta. Patrick, H., Mantzicopoulos, P., & Sears, D. (2012). Effective classrooms. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), Educational Psychology Handbook (Vol. 2, pp. 443–470). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13274-018 LüdtkeORobitzschATrautweinUKunterMAssessing the impact of learning environments: How to use student ratings of classroom or school characteristics in multilevel modelingContemporary Educational Psychology200934212013110.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.12.001 NuthallGAlton-LeeAResearch on teaching and learning: Thirty years of changeThe Elementary School Journal199090554757010.1086/461632 Reusser, K., & Reusser-Weyeneth, M. (1997). Verstehen als psychologischer Prozess und als didaktische Aufgabe [Understanding: psychological process and didactic task]. In K. Reusser & M. Reusser-Weyeneth (Eds.), Verstehen. Psychologischer Prozess und didaktische Aufgabe (2 ed., pp. 9–35). Huber. KliemeEPauliCReusserKJanikTSeidelTThe Pythagoras study: Investigating effects of teaching and learning in Swiss and German mathematics classroomsThe power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom2009Waxmann137160 Lipowsky, F., Drollinger-Vetter, B., Hartig, J., & Klieme, E. (2006). Dokumentation der Erhebungs- und Auswertungsinstrumente zur schweizerisch-deutschen Videostudie "Unterrichtsqualität, Lernverhalten und mathematisches Verständnis". 2. Leistungstests [Achievement tests]. GFPF. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:3107 Hugener, I., Pauli, C., Reusser, K., Lipowsky, F., Rakoczy, K., & Klieme, E. (2009). Teaching patterns and learning quality in Swiss and German mathematics lessons. Learning and Instruction, 19(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.02.001 MayerRETobiasSDuffyTConstructivism as a theory of learning versus constructivism as a prescription for instructionConstructivist instruction: Success or failure?2009Routledge184200 Reusser, K., & Pauli, C. (2010). Unterrichtsgestaltung und Unterrichtsqualität - Ergebnisse einer internationalen und schweizerischen Videostudie zum Mathematikunterricht: Einleitung und Überblick [Lesson design and quality of instruction: Results of an international and Swiss video study on mathematics teaching. Introduction and overview]. In K. Reusser, C. Pauli, & M. Waldis (Eds.), Unterrichtsgestaltung und Unterrichtsqualität – Ergebnisse einer internationalen und schweizerischen Videostudie zum Mathematikunterricht (pp. 9–32). Waxmann. Fauth, B., Göllner, R., Lenske, G., Praetorius, A.-K., & Wagner, W. (2020). Who sees what? Conceptual considerations on the measurement of teaching quality from different perspectives. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 66. Beiheft, 255–268. Schlesinger, L., Jentsch, A., Kaiser, G., König, J., & Blömeke, S. (2018). Subject-specific characteristics of instructional quality in mathematics education. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 50(3), 475–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0917-5 Rakoczy, K., Buff, A., & Lipowsky, F. (2005). Dokumentation der Erhebungs- und Auswertungsinstrumente zur schweizerisch-deutschen Videostudie "Unterrichtsqualität, Lernverhalten und mathematisches Verständnis". 1. Befragungsinstrumente [Questionnaires]. GFPF. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:3106 WertheimerMProductive thinking1945Harper Drollinger-Vetter, B., Lipowsky, F., Pauli, C., Reusser, K., & Klieme, E. (2006). Cognitive level in problem segments and theory segments. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 38(5), 399–412. Scherer, R., Nilsen, T., & Jansen, M. (2016). Evaluating individual students' perceptions of instructional quality: An investigation of their factor structure, measurement invariance, and relations to educational outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(110). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00110 Cheng, Q., Shen, J., & Zhang, S. (2023). Comparing perceived and observed instructional practices and their predictive power for student mathematics achievement: An analysis of Shanghai data from OECD global teaching inSights. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, 27527263231210322. https://doi.org/10.1177/27527263231210322 Aebli, H. (1980/1981). Denken, das Ordnen des Tuns [Thinking: The ordering of doing, Vol. I,II). Klett-Cotta. Prediger, S., Götze, D., Holzäpfel, L., Rösken-Winter, B., & Selter, C. (2022). Five principles for high-quality mathematics teaching: Combining normative, epistemological, empirical, and pragmatic perspectives for specifying the content of professional development. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.969212 Reusser, K. (2006). Konstruktivismus - vom epistemologischen Leitbegriff zur Erneuerung der didaktischen Kultur [Constructivism: from a key epistemological concept to a new instructional culture]. In M. Baer, M. Fuchs, P. Füglister, K. Reusser, & H. Wyss (Eds.), Didaktik auf psychologischer Grundlage. Von Hans Aeblis kognitionspsychologischer Didaktik zur modernen Lehr- und Lernforschung (pp. 151–168). hep. LipowskyFRakoczyKPauliCDrollinger-VetterBKliemeEReusserKQuality of geometry instruction and its short-term impact on students' understanding of the Pythagorean TheoremLearning and Instruction200919652753710.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.11.001 Reusser, K. (2005). Problemorientiertes Lernen - Tiefenstruktur, Gestaltungsformen, Wirkung [Problem-based learning–deep structure, forms of design, effects]. Beiträge zur Lehrerbildung, 23(2), 159–182. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:13570 WallaceTLKelceyBRuzekEWhat can student perception surveys tell us about teaching? Empirically testing the underlying structure of the Tripod student perception surveyAmerican Educational Research Journal20165361834186810.3102/0002831216671864 De JongRWesterhofKJThe quality of student ratings of teacher behaviourLearning Environments Research200141518510.1023/A:1011402608575 Lindmeier, A., & Heinze, A. (2020). Die fachdidaktische Perspektive in der Unterrichtsqualitätsforschung: (bisher) ignoriert, implizit enthalten oder nicht relevant? [The subject-specific perspective in teaching quality research: (so far) ignored, implicitly included or not relevant?]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 66. Beiheft, 255–268. HiebertJGrouwsDALesterFKThe effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students' learningSecond handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning2007Information Age Publishing371404 BrunnerEQualität von Mathematikunterricht: Eine Frage der PerspektiveJournal für Mathematik-Didaktik201839225728410.1007/s13138-017-0122-z DreherALeudersTFachspezifität von Unterrichtsqualität – aus der Perspektive der Mathematikdidaktik [Subject-specificity of instructional quality—From the perspective of mathematics education]Unterrichtswissenschaft202149228529210.1007/s42010-021-00116-9 Praetorius, A.-K., & Charalambous, C. Y. (2018). Classroom observation frameworks for studying instructional quality: looking back and looking forward. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 50(3), 535–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0946-0 Charalambous, C. Y., & Praetorius, A.-K. (2018). Studying mathematics instruction through different lenses: setting the ground for understanding instructional quality more comprehensively. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 50(3), 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0914-8 Drollinger- 1561_CR8 O Lüdtke (1561_CR36) 2009; 34 E Brunner (1561_CR3) 2018; 39 S Vieluf (1561_CR60) 2022; 50 1561_CR19 1561_CR1 1561_CR17 1561_CR2 1561_CR16 S Rieser (1561_CR53) 2023 1561_CR15 1561_CR59 A Dreher (1561_CR10) 2021; 49 1561_CR14 1561_CR58 1561_CR5 1561_CR13 1561_CR57 1561_CR6 1561_CR12 S Merk (1561_CR39) 2021; 49 1561_CR56 1561_CR11 1561_CR55 1561_CR54 1561_CR52 ML Wu (1561_CR68) 1997 1561_CR51 1561_CR50 K Gravemeijer (1561_CR18) 2017; 15 SW Raudenbush (1561_CR48) 1993; 30 M Kunter (1561_CR30) 2013 J Cai (1561_CR4) 2020; 51 1561_CR49 NC Jansen (1561_CR25) 2022; 50 1561_CR47 1561_CR46 B Wisniewski (1561_CR67) 2020; 66 1561_CR44 1561_CR43 1561_CR42 1561_CR41 E Klieme (1561_CR26) 2009 J Hiebert (1561_CR23) 2007 G Nuthall (1561_CR40) 1990; 90 HW Marsh (1561_CR37) 2005; 19 S Korntreff (1561_CR28) 2022; 43 M Kunter (1561_CR29) 2006; 9 F Lipowsky (1561_CR35) 2009; 19 J Hiebert (1561_CR22) 1992 1561_CR34 1561_CR33 1561_CR32 KR Koedinger (1561_CR27) 2012; 36 MTH Chi (1561_CR7) 2014; 49 S Prediger (1561_CR45) 2023 TL Wallace (1561_CR64) 2016; 53 M Wertheimer (1561_CR66) 1945 R De Jong (1561_CR9) 2001; 4 G Lenske (1561_CR31) 2020; 34 1561_CR24 1561_CR21 RE Mayer (1561_CR38) 2009 1561_CR20 1561_CR62 1561_CR61 M Waldis (1561_CR63) 2010 M-T Wang (1561_CR65) 2016; 26 |
| References_xml | – reference: HiebertJCarpenterTPGrouwsDALearning and teaching with understandingHandbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning1992Macmillan6597 – reference: LüdtkeORobitzschATrautweinUKunterMAssessing the impact of learning environments: How to use student ratings of classroom or school characteristics in multilevel modelingContemporary Educational Psychology200934212013110.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.12.001 – reference: Herbert, B., Fischer, J., & Klieme, E. (2022). How valid are student perceptions of teaching quality across education systems? Learning and Instruction, 82, 101652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101652 – reference: Lindmeier, A., & Heinze, A. (2020). Die fachdidaktische Perspektive in der Unterrichtsqualitätsforschung: (bisher) ignoriert, implizit enthalten oder nicht relevant? [The subject-specific perspective in teaching quality research: (so far) ignored, implicitly included or not relevant?]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 66. Beiheft, 255–268. – reference: Fend, H. (1998). Qualität im Bildungswesen. Schulforschung zu Systembedingungen, Schulprofilen und Lehrerleistung [Quality in Education. Research on the quality of school system, school profiles, and teacher performance]. Juventa. – reference: Fauth, B., Göllner, R., Lenske, G., Praetorius, A.-K., & Wagner, W. (2020). Who sees what? Conceptual considerations on the measurement of teaching quality from different perspectives. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 66. Beiheft, 255–268. – reference: Scherer, R., & Gustafsson, J.-E. (2015). Student assessment of teaching as a source of Information about aspects of teaching quality in multiple subject domains: An application of multilevel bifactor structural equation modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01550 – reference: Aebli, H. (1980/1981). Denken, das Ordnen des Tuns [Thinking: The ordering of doing, Vol. I,II). Klett-Cotta. – reference: Heller, K. A., & Perleth, C. (2000). Kognitiver Fähigkeitstest für 4. bis 12. Klassen, Revision (KFT 4–12+R) [Cognitive ability test]. Beltz Test. – reference: WaldisMGrobUPauliCReusserKReusserKPauliCWaldisMDer Einfluss der Unterrichtsgestaltung auf Fachinteresse und Mathematikleistung [The influence of instruction on interest and mathematics achievement]Unterrichtsgestaltung und Unterrichtsqualität – Ergebnisse einer internationalen und schweizerischen Videostudie zum Mathematikunterricht2010Waxmann209251 – reference: KoedingerKRCorbettATPerfettiCThe Knowledge-Learning-Instruction (KLI) framework: Bridging the science-practice chasm to enhance robust student learningCognitive Science201236575779810.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01245.x – reference: WertheimerMProductive thinking1945Harper – reference: LipowskyFRakoczyKPauliCDrollinger-VetterBKliemeEReusserKQuality of geometry instruction and its short-term impact on students' understanding of the Pythagorean TheoremLearning and Instruction200919652753710.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.11.001 – reference: Reusser, K. (2006). Konstruktivismus - vom epistemologischen Leitbegriff zur Erneuerung der didaktischen Kultur [Constructivism: from a key epistemological concept to a new instructional culture]. In M. Baer, M. Fuchs, P. Füglister, K. Reusser, & H. Wyss (Eds.), Didaktik auf psychologischer Grundlage. Von Hans Aeblis kognitionspsychologischer Didaktik zur modernen Lehr- und Lernforschung (pp. 151–168). hep. – reference: Drollinger-Vetter, B., & Lipowsky, F. (2006). Fachdidaktische Qualität der Theoriephasen [Quality of theory phases in mathematics lessons]. In I. Hugener, C. Pauli, & K. Reusser (Eds.), Videoanalysen (= Teil 3 der Dokumentation Erhebungs- und Auswertungsinstrumente zur schweizerisch-deutschen Videostudie "Unterrichtsqualität, Lernverhalten und mathematisches Verständnis", hrsg. von E. Klieme, C. Pauli & K. Reusser) (pp. 189–205). GFPF/DIPF. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:3130 – reference: KunterMBaumertJWho is the expert? Construct and criteria validity of student and teacher ratings of instructionLearning Environments Research20069323125110.1007/s10984-006-9015-7 – reference: Wagner, W., Göllner, R., Helmke, A., Trautwein, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2013). Construct validity of student perceptions of instructional quality is high, but not perfect: Dimensionality and generalizability of domain-independent assessments. Learning and Instruction, 28(0), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.03.003 – reference: Aebli, H. (1983). Zwölf Grundformen des Lehrens [Twelve basic forms of teaching]. Klett-Cotta. – reference: WuMLAdamsRJWilsonMRConQuest: Multi-aspect test software [computer program]1997Australian Council for Educational Research – reference: Praetorius, A.-K., & Charalambous, C. Y. (2018). Classroom observation frameworks for studying instructional quality: looking back and looking forward. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 50(3), 535–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0946-0 – reference: VielufSWie, wann und warum nutzen Schüler*innen Lerngelegenheiten im Unterricht? Eine übergreifende Diskussion der Beiträge zum Thementeil [How, when and why do students use learning opportunities in the classroom? An overarching discussion of the contributions to the topical focus section]Unterrichtswissenschaft202250226528610.1007/s42010-022-00144-z – reference: Schlesinger, L., Jentsch, A., Kaiser, G., König, J., & Blömeke, S. (2018). Subject-specific characteristics of instructional quality in mathematics education. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 50(3), 475–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0917-5 – reference: De JongRWesterhofKJThe quality of student ratings of teacher behaviourLearning Environments Research200141518510.1023/A:1011402608575 – reference: JansenNCDecristanJFauthBIndividuelle Nutzung unterrichtlicher Angebote – Zur Bedeutung von Lernvoraussetzungen und Unterrichtsbeteiligung [Individual use of instruction–On the relevance of students’ characteristics and participation in classroom discourse]Unterrichtswissenschaft202250215718310.1007/s42010-021-00141-8 – reference: MerkSBatzel-KremerABohlTKleinknechtMLeudersTNutzung und Wirkung eines kognitiv aktivierenden Unterrichts bei nicht-gymnasialen Schülerinnen und Schülern [Use and effects of cognitively activating instruction on non-high school students]Unterrichtswissenschaft202149346748710.1007/s42010-021-00101-2 – reference: Helmke, A. (2003). Unterrichtsqualität - erfassen, bewerten, verbessern [Assessing, evaluating, and enhancing instructional quality]. Kallmeyer. – reference: Reusser, K. (2005). Problemorientiertes Lernen - Tiefenstruktur, Gestaltungsformen, Wirkung [Problem-based learning–deep structure, forms of design, effects]. Beiträge zur Lehrerbildung, 23(2), 159–182. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:13570 – reference: Charalambous, C. Y., & Praetorius, A.-K. (2018). Studying mathematics instruction through different lenses: setting the ground for understanding instructional quality more comprehensively. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 50(3), 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0914-8 – reference: Patrick, H., Mantzicopoulos, P., & Sears, D. (2012). Effective classrooms. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), Educational Psychology Handbook (Vol. 2, pp. 443–470). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13274-018 – reference: Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Rieser, S., Klieme, E., & Büttner, G. (2014). Student ratings of teaching quality in primary school: Dimensions and prediction of student outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 29(0), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.001 – reference: CaiJMorrisAHohenseeCHwangSRobisonVCirilloMKramerSLHiebertJBakkerAMaximizing the quality of learning opportunities for every studentJournal for Research in Mathematics Education2020511122510.5951/jresematheduc.2019.0005 – reference: Rakoczy, K., Buff, A., & Lipowsky, F. (2005). Dokumentation der Erhebungs- und Auswertungsinstrumente zur schweizerisch-deutschen Videostudie "Unterrichtsqualität, Lernverhalten und mathematisches Verständnis". 1. Befragungsinstrumente [Questionnaires]. GFPF. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:3106 – reference: Drollinger-Vetter, B., Lipowsky, F., Pauli, C., Reusser, K., & Klieme, E. (2006). Cognitive level in problem segments and theory segments. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 38(5), 399–412. – reference: Scherer, R., Nilsen, T., & Jansen, M. (2016). Evaluating individual students' perceptions of instructional quality: An investigation of their factor structure, measurement invariance, and relations to educational outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(110). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00110 – reference: Drollinger-Vetter, B. (2011). Verstehenselemente und strukturelle Klarheit. Fachdidaktische Qualität der Anleitung von mathematischen Verstehensprozessen im Unterricht [Elements of comprehension and structural clarity]. Waxmann. – reference: KunterMVossAKunterMBaumertJBlumDKlusmannUKraussSNeubrandMThe model of instructional quality in COACTIV: A multicriteria analysisCognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers2013Springer9712410.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5_6 – reference: Lipowsky, F., Drollinger-Vetter, B., Hartig, J., & Klieme, E. (2006). Dokumentation der Erhebungs- und Auswertungsinstrumente zur schweizerisch-deutschen Videostudie "Unterrichtsqualität, Lernverhalten und mathematisches Verständnis". 2. Leistungstests [Achievement tests]. GFPF. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:3107 – reference: HiebertJGrouwsDALesterFKThe effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students' learningSecond handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning2007Information Age Publishing371404 – reference: KliemeEPauliCReusserKJanikTSeidelTThe Pythagoras study: Investigating effects of teaching and learning in Swiss and German mathematics classroomsThe power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom2009Waxmann137160 – reference: Schlesinger, L., & Jentsch, A. (2016). Theoretical and methodological challenges in measuring instructional quality in mathematics education using classroom observations. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 48(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0765-0 – reference: Cheng, Q., Shen, J., & Zhang, S. (2023). Comparing perceived and observed instructional practices and their predictive power for student mathematics achievement: An analysis of Shanghai data from OECD global teaching inSights. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, 27527263231210322. https://doi.org/10.1177/27527263231210322 – reference: RieserSDecristanJKognitive Aktivierung in Befragungen von Schülerinnen und Schülern [Cognitive activation in student questionnaires – Distinguishing between the potential for cognitive activation and individual cognitive activation]Zeitschrift Für Pädagogische Psychologie202310.1024/1010-0652/a000359 – reference: Schoenfeld, A. H. (2018). Video analyses for research and professional development: the teaching for robust understanding (TRU) framework. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 50(3), 491–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0908-y – reference: PredigerSErathKQuabeckKStahnkeREffects of interaction qualities beyond task quality: Disentangling instructional support and cognitive demandsInternational Journal of Science and Mathematics Education202310.1007/s10763-023-10389-4 – reference: WallaceTLKelceyBRuzekEWhat can student perception surveys tell us about teaching? Empirically testing the underlying structure of the Tripod student perception surveyAmerican Educational Research Journal20165361834186810.3102/0002831216671864 – reference: Praetorius, A.-K., Klieme, E., Herbert, B., & Pinger, P. (2018). Generic dimensions of teaching quality: the German framework of Three Basic Dimensions. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 50(3), 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0918-4 – reference: NuthallGAlton-LeeAResearch on teaching and learning: Thirty years of changeThe Elementary School Journal199090554757010.1086/461632 – reference: Reusser, K., & Reusser-Weyeneth, M. (1997). Verstehen als psychologischer Prozess und als didaktische Aufgabe [Understanding: psychological process and didactic task]. In K. Reusser & M. Reusser-Weyeneth (Eds.), Verstehen. Psychologischer Prozess und didaktische Aufgabe (2 ed., pp. 9–35). Huber. – reference: Lingel, K., Lenhart, J., & Schneider, W. (2019). Metacognition in mathematics: do different metacognitive monitoring measures make a difference? ZDM–Mathematics Education, 51(4), 587–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01062-8 – reference: Göllner, R., Fauth, B., & Wagner, W. (2021). Student ratings of teaching quality dimensions: Empirical findings and future directions. In W. Rollett, H. Bijlsma, & S. Röhl (Eds.), Student feedback on teaching in schools: Using student perceptions for the development of teaching and teachers (pp. 111–122). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75150-0_7 – reference: GravemeijerKStephanMJulieCLinF-LOhtaniMWhat mathematics education may prepare students for the society of the future?International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education201715110512310.1007/s10763-017-9814-6 – reference: Vieluf, S., & Klieme, E. (2023). Teaching Effectiveness Revisited Through the Lens of Practice Theories. In A.-K. Praetorius & C. Y. Charalambous (Eds.), Theorizing Teaching: Current Status and Open Issues (pp. 57–95). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25613-4_3 – reference: ChiMTHWylieRThe ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomesEducational Psychologist201449421924310.1080/00461520.2014.965823 – reference: MayerRETobiasSDuffyTConstructivism as a theory of learning versus constructivism as a prescription for instructionConstructivist instruction: Success or failure?2009Routledge184200 – reference: KorntreffSPredigerSVerstehensangebote von YouTube-Erklärvideos – Konzeptualisierung und Analyse am Beispiel algebraischer Konzepte [Conceptual Learning Opportunities of Instructional YouTube Videos – Conceptualization and Analysis for the Case of Algebraic Concepts]Journal Für Mathematik-Didaktik202243228131010.1007/s13138-021-00190-7 – reference: LenskeGPraetoriusA-KSchülerfeedback - was steckt hinter dem Kreuz auf dem Fragebogen? [Student feedback–what is the basis for choosing an answer on a questionnaire?]Empirische Pädagogik20203411129 – reference: Senden, B., Nilsen, T., & Teig, N. (2023). The validity of student ratings of teaching quality: Factorial structure, comparability, and the relation to achievement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 78, 101274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101274 – reference: DreherALeudersTFachspezifität von Unterrichtsqualität – aus der Perspektive der Mathematikdidaktik [Subject-specificity of instructional quality—From the perspective of mathematics education]Unterrichtswissenschaft202149228529210.1007/s42010-021-00116-9 – reference: Hugener, I., Pauli, C., Reusser, K., Lipowsky, F., Rakoczy, K., & Klieme, E. (2009). Teaching patterns and learning quality in Swiss and German mathematics lessons. Learning and Instruction, 19(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.02.001 – reference: WisniewskiBZiererKDreselMDaumillerMObtaining secondary students’ perceptions of instructional quality: Two-level structure and measurement invarianceLearning and Instruction20206610130310.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101303 – reference: Clausen, M. (2002). Unterrichtsqualität: Eine Frage der Perspektive? Empirische Analysen zur Übereinstimmung, Konstrukt- und Kriteriumsvalidität [Instructional quality: A matter of perspective?]. Waxmann. – reference: RaudenbushSWRowanBCheongYFHigher order instructional goals in secondary school: Class, teacher and school influencesAmerican Educational Research Journal199330352355310.3102/00028312030003523 – reference: Reusser, K., & Pauli, C. (2010). Unterrichtsgestaltung und Unterrichtsqualität - Ergebnisse einer internationalen und schweizerischen Videostudie zum Mathematikunterricht: Einleitung und Überblick [Lesson design and quality of instruction: Results of an international and Swiss video study on mathematics teaching. Introduction and overview]. In K. Reusser, C. Pauli, & M. Waldis (Eds.), Unterrichtsgestaltung und Unterrichtsqualität – Ergebnisse einer internationalen und schweizerischen Videostudie zum Mathematikunterricht (pp. 9–32). Waxmann. – reference: BrunnerEQualität von Mathematikunterricht: Eine Frage der PerspektiveJournal für Mathematik-Didaktik201839225728410.1007/s13138-017-0122-z – reference: Prediger, S., Götze, D., Holzäpfel, L., Rösken-Winter, B., & Selter, C. (2022). Five principles for high-quality mathematics teaching: Combining normative, epistemological, empirical, and pragmatic perspectives for specifying the content of professional development. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.969212 – reference: WangM-TEcclesJSMultilevel predictors of math classroom climate: A comparison study of student and teacher perceptionsJournal of Research on Adolescence201626361763410.1111/jora.12153 – reference: MarshHWBig-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-conceptZeitschrift Für Pädagogische Psychologie200519311912910.1024/1010-0652.19.3.119 – reference: Rakoczy, K., Klieme, E., Drollinger-Vetter, B., Lipowsky, F., Pauli, C., & Reusser, K. (2007). Structure as a quality feature in mathematics instruction: Cognitive and motivational effects of a structured organisation of the learning environment vs. a structured presentation of learning content. In M. Prenzel (Ed.), Studies on the educational quality of schools. The final report on the DFG Priority Programme (pp. 101–120). Waxmann. – ident: 1561_CR20 – volume: 66 start-page: 101303 year: 2020 ident: 1561_CR67 publication-title: Learning and Instruction doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101303 – ident: 1561_CR55 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00110 – ident: 1561_CR1 – ident: 1561_CR32 doi: 10.3262/ZPB2001255 – ident: 1561_CR6 doi: 10.1177/27527263231210322 – start-page: 371 volume-title: Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning year: 2007 ident: 1561_CR23 – ident: 1561_CR47 – start-page: 209 volume-title: Unterrichtsgestaltung und Unterrichtsqualität – Ergebnisse einer internationalen und schweizerischen Videostudie zum Mathematikunterricht year: 2010 ident: 1561_CR63 – volume: 15 start-page: 105 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 1561_CR18 publication-title: International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education doi: 10.1007/s10763-017-9814-6 – ident: 1561_CR44 doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.969212 – ident: 1561_CR54 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01550 – ident: 1561_CR11 – volume: 53 start-page: 1834 issue: 6 year: 2016 ident: 1561_CR64 publication-title: American Educational Research Journal doi: 10.3102/0002831216671864 – ident: 1561_CR12 doi: 10.25656/01:3130 – ident: 1561_CR13 doi: 10.1007/BF02652801 – ident: 1561_CR41 doi: 10.1037/13274-018 – volume: 36 start-page: 757 issue: 5 year: 2012 ident: 1561_CR27 publication-title: Cognitive Science doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01245.x – ident: 1561_CR2 – start-page: 97 volume-title: Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers year: 2013 ident: 1561_CR30 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5_6 – ident: 1561_CR34 doi: 10.25656/01:3107 – year: 2023 ident: 1561_CR53 publication-title: Zeitschrift Für Pädagogische Psychologie doi: 10.1024/1010-0652/a000359 – ident: 1561_CR62 doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.03.003 – volume: 39 start-page: 257 issue: 2 year: 2018 ident: 1561_CR3 publication-title: Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik doi: 10.1007/s13138-017-0122-z – volume: 43 start-page: 281 issue: 2 year: 2022 ident: 1561_CR28 publication-title: Journal Für Mathematik-Didaktik doi: 10.1007/s13138-021-00190-7 – volume: 34 start-page: 120 issue: 2 year: 2009 ident: 1561_CR36 publication-title: Contemporary Educational Psychology doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.12.001 – volume: 4 start-page: 51 issue: 1 year: 2001 ident: 1561_CR9 publication-title: Learning Environments Research doi: 10.1023/A:1011402608575 – ident: 1561_CR59 doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101274 – volume-title: Productive thinking year: 1945 ident: 1561_CR66 – ident: 1561_CR57 doi: 10.1007/s11858-018-0917-5 – ident: 1561_CR58 doi: 10.1007/s11858-017-0908-y – ident: 1561_CR5 doi: 10.1007/s11858-018-0914-8 – volume: 9 start-page: 231 issue: 3 year: 2006 ident: 1561_CR29 publication-title: Learning Environments Research doi: 10.1007/s10984-006-9015-7 – ident: 1561_CR16 – ident: 1561_CR42 doi: 10.1007/s11858-018-0946-0 – ident: 1561_CR50 – ident: 1561_CR14 doi: 10.3262/ZPB2001138 – volume-title: ConQuest: Multi-aspect test software [computer program] year: 1997 ident: 1561_CR68 – volume: 49 start-page: 219 issue: 4 year: 2014 ident: 1561_CR7 publication-title: Educational Psychologist doi: 10.1080/00461520.2014.965823 – year: 2023 ident: 1561_CR45 publication-title: International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education doi: 10.1007/s10763-023-10389-4 – volume: 49 start-page: 467 issue: 3 year: 2021 ident: 1561_CR39 publication-title: Unterrichtswissenschaft doi: 10.1007/s42010-021-00101-2 – ident: 1561_CR46 doi: 10.25656/01:3106 – ident: 1561_CR49 doi: 10.25656/01:13570 – ident: 1561_CR51 – ident: 1561_CR17 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-75150-0_7 – ident: 1561_CR19 – ident: 1561_CR21 doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101652 – volume: 51 start-page: 12 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 1561_CR4 publication-title: Journal for Research in Mathematics Education doi: 10.5951/jresematheduc.2019.0005 – ident: 1561_CR24 doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.02.001 – ident: 1561_CR33 doi: 10.1007/s11858-019-01062-8 – start-page: 184 volume-title: Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? year: 2009 ident: 1561_CR38 – volume: 50 start-page: 265 issue: 2 year: 2022 ident: 1561_CR60 publication-title: Unterrichtswissenschaft doi: 10.1007/s42010-022-00144-z – ident: 1561_CR43 doi: 10.1007/s11858-018-0918-4 – ident: 1561_CR61 doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-25613-4_3 – volume: 30 start-page: 523 issue: 3 year: 1993 ident: 1561_CR48 publication-title: American Educational Research Journal doi: 10.3102/00028312030003523 – ident: 1561_CR56 doi: 10.1007/s11858-016-0765-0 – ident: 1561_CR15 doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.001 – start-page: 65 volume-title: Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning year: 1992 ident: 1561_CR22 – volume: 50 start-page: 157 issue: 2 year: 2022 ident: 1561_CR25 publication-title: Unterrichtswissenschaft doi: 10.1007/s42010-021-00141-8 – volume: 34 start-page: 11 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 1561_CR31 publication-title: Empirische Pädagogik – ident: 1561_CR8 – volume: 49 start-page: 285 issue: 2 year: 2021 ident: 1561_CR10 publication-title: Unterrichtswissenschaft doi: 10.1007/s42010-021-00116-9 – volume: 26 start-page: 617 issue: 3 year: 2016 ident: 1561_CR65 publication-title: Journal of Research on Adolescence doi: 10.1111/jora.12153 – volume: 19 start-page: 527 issue: 6 year: 2009 ident: 1561_CR35 publication-title: Learning and Instruction doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.11.001 – volume: 90 start-page: 547 issue: 5 year: 1990 ident: 1561_CR40 publication-title: The Elementary School Journal doi: 10.1086/461632 – start-page: 137 volume-title: The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom year: 2009 ident: 1561_CR26 – volume: 19 start-page: 119 issue: 3 year: 2005 ident: 1561_CR37 publication-title: Zeitschrift Für Pädagogische Psychologie doi: 10.1024/1010-0652.19.3.119 – ident: 1561_CR52 |
| SSID | ssj0026639 |
| Score | 2.3328195 |
| Snippet | Based on an opportunity-use model of instructional quality, this study investigates the extent to which subject-specific instructional quality rated by experts... |
| SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref springer |
| SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 893 |
| SubjectTerms | Classroom Communication Classroom management Classroom Research Classroom Techniques Comprehension Criteria Education Educational Opportunities Educational Quality Knowledge Learning Learning Processes Learning Theories Mathematical Applications Mathematics Mathematics Education Mathematics Instruction Mathematics Skills Observation Original Paper Pedagogy Perceptions Prior Learning Quality assessment Questionnaires Rating Scales Ratings & rankings Student attitudes Student Behavior Student Characteristics Student Evaluation Student Surveys Students Teacher Behavior Teacher Effectiveness Teacher Evaluation Teachers Teaching Theorems Validity |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present dbid: RSV link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3LbtUwELWgsKALHuUVWtAgsQNLie04Npuqqqi6gArxUndR7DjtRSKpmlwqdvwG_8EX8SUdO69eCgvYxo4dy2PPTGbOGUKeMeMy61JBTSI1FWWsqNLW0dTFhXax0akJQOHX2cGBOjzUbwdQWDtmu48hyXBTz2A3VC2Kok6hHv6bUH6VXEN1p3zBhnfvP01uFupQb_QmSnKq0fkboDJ_HmNVHV2yMS-nSv4WLw1qaO_W_y3gNrk5mJ2w08vJHXLF1Ru-YvOQ3bFB1t9M_K3tXfJztzjpAoAR8Cm0S-N_11APy_SpRdBDMb9BU8GX-T1YzHS0L2G_OYOygVBCoIPPy_IooOkgoGccdA20Pa9m--v7DygmhtDWj-pnvTBJCGdAc1bDUOXiCIq6hOVFZM72PfJx79WH3X061HegFu2CjhZ4GTDpbKlSI2LDjLaZTVhsK7S6CiZKLZUHvjrJZcVtpkrBbGass0mqmOH8Plmrm9o9JFBUGm1HWTkrYpFVmS6ZigslhWNOZVxF5Pm4zflJT-ORz4TNfl9y3Jc87EvOI7I1SkI-HOk297REwXsVEXk6NeNh9BGWonbNMvSR6POjcx-RB73gTNNxjbagknFE1IpITR080fdqS704DoTfHjmOfimu4sUoWfN3_X0Zj_6t-ya5wbxwhkzFLbKGAuMek-v2a7doT5-EM3YOlZInRA priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
| Title | Capturing the subject-specific quality of mathematics instruction: How do expert judgments relate to students’ assessments of the quality of their own learning and understanding? |
| URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11858-024-01561-3 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39399860 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3115601044 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3116338523 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11469968 |
| Volume | 56 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos001190038800001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Computer Science Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1863-9704 dateEnd: 20241211 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0026639 issn: 1863-9690 databaseCode: K7- dateStart: 19970201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/compscijour providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1863-9704 dateEnd: 20241211 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0026639 issn: 1863-9690 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 19970201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Education Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1863-9704 dateEnd: 20241211 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0026639 issn: 1863-9690 databaseCode: M0P dateStart: 19970201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/education providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present customDbUrl: eissn: 1863-9704 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0026639 issn: 1863-9690 databaseCode: RSV dateStart: 19970201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22 providerName: Springer Nature |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3LbtQwFL2iLQtY8C4NlNFFYgcWiZP4waaCqlUl6GhUHppdFDtOGaQmA8lQseM3-A--iC_BdjKZDhVs2ETK07F87Huv7XMuwBOqDNcmTYiKmCRJEQoipDYkNWEuTahkqjxR-A0fj8V0Kif9hFvTb6tcjol-oC5q7ebInztVGB88JHvzz8RljXKrq30KjQ3Yso6ydAg_DidDwGWtqXN_I8FiIm0Y2JNmOuqcNVSCWAtFHJk4IvG6YbrkbV7eNPnHyqk3SIc3_7cqt-BG74riyw47t-GKqe7A9eNBx7W5Cz_383nriYxor2KzUG7ahjh6pttihB0l8xvWJZ6t3sPZSpb2BR7V51jU6FMJtPhpUZx6Vh16Fo3Btsam09dsfn3_gfmgFNq4r7pSLxTilzWwPq-wz3ZxinlV4OIiQ2fvHrw_PHi3f0T6PA9EW_-gJbkdFCgzuhCpSkJFldRcRzTUpfW-cpoUkglHgDUsZmWsuSgSqrnSRkepoCqOt2GzqiuzA5iX0vqQrDQ6CRNecllQEeaCJYYawWMRwNNlI2fzTs4jWwk3O0hkFhKZh0QWB7C7bMCs79pNtmq9AB4Pt22ndCsteWXqhX-G2djfBvkB3O9gMxQXS-sTChYGINYANTzgBL_X71Szj1742zHIbXxqa_Fsib3Vf_29Gg_-XY2HcI26fuB3KO7CpgWIeQRX9dd21nwZwQafihFsvToYT07s2WtORr6X2ePJ2w-_AfibMck |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V3LbtQwFLWqggQseD8GClwkWIFF4iSOjYQqVKimmumIRZG6C7HjlEEiGUiGUXf8Bj_Bii_iS_B1Xh0q2HXBdpKJx5lzX7bPuYQ8ZsrE2kQhVT6XNMw8QYXUhkbGS6XxlIyUIwpP49lMHB7KtxvkR8eFwWOVnU90jjorNa6RP0dVGFc8hNuLzxS7RuHuatdCo4HFxByvbMlWvdx7bf_fJ4ztvjnYGdO2qwDVNhrVNLUQZNzoTEQq9BRTUsfaZ57ObaxPWZhJLpBuaXjA80DHIguZjpU22o8EU7gAal3-uTAQMdrVJKZ9gWejN6bbvuABlbbsbEk6DVXPBkZBbUSkSF72abAeCE9lt6cPaf6xU-sC4O6V_-3VXSWX21QbXjW2cY1smOI6ubTf69RWN8jPnXRRO6Im2E-hWipclqJIP8UjVNBQTo-hzOHT8D2YD7K7L2BcriArwbVKqOHjMjtyrEFwLCEDdQlVox9a_fr2HdJeCbXCp-KoJwZx2zZQrgpou3kcQVpksDzJQNq-Sd6dyWu7RTaLsjB3CKS5tDkyz40OvTDOY5kx4aWCh4YZi0cxIk87UCWLRq4kGYSpEYKJhWDiIJgEI7LVASZpXVeVDGgZkUf9Zet0cCcpLUy5dPfwIBARs4-43cC0Hy6QNucV3BsRsQbg_gYUNF-_Usw_OGFzZMjb-tvO4lmH9eF3_X0ad_89jYfkwvhgf5pM92aTe-QiQxt0pzG3yKYFi7lPzuuv9bz68sBZM5D3Z20DvwF65YkT |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3NbtQwELagIAQHfkopgQKDxA2sJrbj2FwQKqyKKKtK_Ki3yHacskhNViRLxY3X4D14Ip4E28kmuxQOiGvsxLFmnJnJzPcNQo-ItpmxKcM64RKzIhZYSGNxamMlbaxlqgNQ-CCbTsXRkTxcQfGHavdlSrLDNHiWpqrdnRfl7gh8c2ZGYGdfsIcCJ5ieRxeYL6T38frbD0PI5eypd4ATwSmWLhDsYTN_fsa6aTrjb54tm_wtdxpM0uTa_2_mOrrau6PwvNOfG-icrTZ9J-e-6mMTXXkz8Lo2N9GPPTVvA7AR3FVoFtr_xsEerulLjqCDaH6FuoST8T6YjTS1T2G_PoWihtBaoIVPi-I4oOwgoGostDU0Hd9m8_Pbd1ADc2jjn-pXXVkkpDmgPq2g735xDKoqYLGK2Hm2hd5PXr7b28d93wdsnL_QYuU-EoRbU4hUs1gTLU1mEhKb0nljirBCcuEBsZZTXlKTiYIRk2ljTZIKoim9hTaqurK3EahSOqXgpTUsZlmZyYKIWAnOLLEioyJCj5ciz-cdvUc-Ejl7ueROLnmQS04jtLPUirw_6k3u6YpCVMsi9HAYdofUZ15UZetFmMMpFS7oj9B2p0TDclQ6H1HwOEJiTb2GCZ4AfH2kmn0MROAeUe7iVbeLJ0stG9_r79u482_TH6BLhy8m-cGr6eu76DLxehqKGXfQhtMdew9dNF_aWfP5fjh6vwDMMzMM |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Capturing+the+subject-specific+quality+of+mathematics+instruction%3A+How+do+expert+judgments+relate+to+students%E2%80%99+assessments+of+the+quality+of+their+own+learning+and+understanding%3F&rft.jtitle=ZDM&rft.au=Pauli%2C+Christine&rft.au=Lipowsky%2C+Frank&rft.au=Reusser%2C+Kurt&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.pub=Springer+Nature+B.V&rft.issn=1863-9690&rft.eissn=1863-9704&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=893&rft.epage=905&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs11858-024-01561-3 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1863-9690&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1863-9690&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1863-9690&client=summon |