Standardized practice design with electronic support mechanisms for surgical process improvement: reducing mechanical ventilation time

Hospital surgical care is complex and subject to unwarranted variation. As part of a multiyear effort, we sought to reduce variability in intraoperative care and management of mechanical ventilation in cardiac surgery. We identified a patient population whose care could be standardized and implement...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of surgery Vol. 260; no. 6; p. 1011
Main Authors: Cook, David J, Pulido, Juan N, Thompson, Jeffrey E, Dearani, Joseph A, Ritter, Matthew J, Hanson, Andrew C, Borah, Bijan J, Habermann, Elizabeth B
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States 01.12.2014
Subjects:
ISSN:1528-1140, 1528-1140
Online Access:Get more information
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Hospital surgical care is complex and subject to unwarranted variation. As part of a multiyear effort, we sought to reduce variability in intraoperative care and management of mechanical ventilation in cardiac surgery. We identified a patient population whose care could be standardized and implemented a protocol-based practice model reinforced by electronic mechanisms. In a large cardiac surgery practice, we built a standardized practice model between 2009 and 2011. We compared mechanical ventilation time before (2008) and after (2012) implementation. To ensure groups were comparable, propensity analysis matched patients from the 2 operative years. In 2012, more than 50% of all cardiac surgical patients were managed with our standardized care model; of those, 769 were one-to-one matched with patients undergoing surgery in 2008. Patients had a mix of coronary artery bypass grafting, valve surgery, and combined procedures. Our practice model reduced median mechanical ventilation duration from 9.3 to 6.3 hours (2008 and 2012) (P < 0.001) and intensive care unit length of stay from 26.3 to 22.5 hours (P < 0.001). Reintubation and intensive care unit readmission were unchanged. Variability in ventilation time was also reduced. We demonstrate that in more than 50% of all cardiac surgical patients, a standardized practice model can be used to achieve better results. Clinical outcomes are improved and unwarranted variability is reduced. Success is driven by clear patient identification and well-defined protocols that are clearly communicated both by electronic tools and by empowerment of bedside providers to advance care when clinical criteria are met.
AbstractList Hospital surgical care is complex and subject to unwarranted variation. As part of a multiyear effort, we sought to reduce variability in intraoperative care and management of mechanical ventilation in cardiac surgery. We identified a patient population whose care could be standardized and implemented a protocol-based practice model reinforced by electronic mechanisms. In a large cardiac surgery practice, we built a standardized practice model between 2009 and 2011. We compared mechanical ventilation time before (2008) and after (2012) implementation. To ensure groups were comparable, propensity analysis matched patients from the 2 operative years. In 2012, more than 50% of all cardiac surgical patients were managed with our standardized care model; of those, 769 were one-to-one matched with patients undergoing surgery in 2008. Patients had a mix of coronary artery bypass grafting, valve surgery, and combined procedures. Our practice model reduced median mechanical ventilation duration from 9.3 to 6.3 hours (2008 and 2012) (P < 0.001) and intensive care unit length of stay from 26.3 to 22.5 hours (P < 0.001). Reintubation and intensive care unit readmission were unchanged. Variability in ventilation time was also reduced. We demonstrate that in more than 50% of all cardiac surgical patients, a standardized practice model can be used to achieve better results. Clinical outcomes are improved and unwarranted variability is reduced. Success is driven by clear patient identification and well-defined protocols that are clearly communicated both by electronic tools and by empowerment of bedside providers to advance care when clinical criteria are met.
Hospital surgical care is complex and subject to unwarranted variation.BACKGROUNDHospital surgical care is complex and subject to unwarranted variation.As part of a multiyear effort, we sought to reduce variability in intraoperative care and management of mechanical ventilation in cardiac surgery. We identified a patient population whose care could be standardized and implemented a protocol-based practice model reinforced by electronic mechanisms.OBJECTIVEAs part of a multiyear effort, we sought to reduce variability in intraoperative care and management of mechanical ventilation in cardiac surgery. We identified a patient population whose care could be standardized and implemented a protocol-based practice model reinforced by electronic mechanisms.In a large cardiac surgery practice, we built a standardized practice model between 2009 and 2011. We compared mechanical ventilation time before (2008) and after (2012) implementation. To ensure groups were comparable, propensity analysis matched patients from the 2 operative years.METHODSIn a large cardiac surgery practice, we built a standardized practice model between 2009 and 2011. We compared mechanical ventilation time before (2008) and after (2012) implementation. To ensure groups were comparable, propensity analysis matched patients from the 2 operative years.In 2012, more than 50% of all cardiac surgical patients were managed with our standardized care model; of those, 769 were one-to-one matched with patients undergoing surgery in 2008. Patients had a mix of coronary artery bypass grafting, valve surgery, and combined procedures. Our practice model reduced median mechanical ventilation duration from 9.3 to 6.3 hours (2008 and 2012) (P < 0.001) and intensive care unit length of stay from 26.3 to 22.5 hours (P < 0.001). Reintubation and intensive care unit readmission were unchanged. Variability in ventilation time was also reduced.RESULTSIn 2012, more than 50% of all cardiac surgical patients were managed with our standardized care model; of those, 769 were one-to-one matched with patients undergoing surgery in 2008. Patients had a mix of coronary artery bypass grafting, valve surgery, and combined procedures. Our practice model reduced median mechanical ventilation duration from 9.3 to 6.3 hours (2008 and 2012) (P < 0.001) and intensive care unit length of stay from 26.3 to 22.5 hours (P < 0.001). Reintubation and intensive care unit readmission were unchanged. Variability in ventilation time was also reduced.We demonstrate that in more than 50% of all cardiac surgical patients, a standardized practice model can be used to achieve better results. Clinical outcomes are improved and unwarranted variability is reduced. Success is driven by clear patient identification and well-defined protocols that are clearly communicated both by electronic tools and by empowerment of bedside providers to advance care when clinical criteria are met.CONCLUSIONSWe demonstrate that in more than 50% of all cardiac surgical patients, a standardized practice model can be used to achieve better results. Clinical outcomes are improved and unwarranted variability is reduced. Success is driven by clear patient identification and well-defined protocols that are clearly communicated both by electronic tools and by empowerment of bedside providers to advance care when clinical criteria are met.
Author Ritter, Matthew J
Cook, David J
Borah, Bijan J
Thompson, Jeffrey E
Pulido, Juan N
Dearani, Joseph A
Habermann, Elizabeth B
Hanson, Andrew C
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: David J
  surname: Cook
  fullname: Cook, David J
  organization: Department of Anesthesiology and Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Division of Cardiovascular Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN †Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Cardiovascular Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN ‡United Surgical Partners Inc, Addison, TX §Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN ‖Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN ¶Health Services Research, Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Juan N
  surname: Pulido
  fullname: Pulido, Juan N
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Jeffrey E
  surname: Thompson
  fullname: Thompson, Jeffrey E
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Joseph A
  surname: Dearani
  fullname: Dearani, Joseph A
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Matthew J
  surname: Ritter
  fullname: Ritter, Matthew J
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Andrew C
  surname: Hanson
  fullname: Hanson, Andrew C
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Bijan J
  surname: Borah
  fullname: Borah, Bijan J
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Elizabeth B
  surname: Habermann
  fullname: Habermann, Elizabeth B
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24836149$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNkE1LAzEQhoNU7If-A5EcvbQm2ZhsvZXiFxQ8VM8lO5ltI7vZmmQr-gP83a7YQmcO8zLzvMMwQ9LzjUdCLjmbcDbVN8vFbMKOQwt1Qgb8VuRjziXrHek-Gcb4zhiXOdNnpC9knikupwPys0zGWxOs-0ZLt8FAcoDUYnRrTz9d2lCsEFJovAMa2-22CYnWCBvjXawjLZvQtcPagak6fwMYI3V1p3ZYo093NKBtwfn1wfUH7rqJq0xyjafJ1XhOTktTRbzY1xF5e7h_nT-NFy-Pz_PZYgxSKDVGkBlIw5TQZaFzzDNhDORcGi5L1aWAXIMxqig02hKhsHoKWjLDCixtLkbk-n9vd99HizGtahcBq8p4bNq44krIaZYxlXXo1R5tixrtahtcbcLX6vA78Qu5Vnin
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0000000000001198
crossref_primary_10_3389_fped_2021_709433
crossref_primary_10_1097_CCE_0000000000000802
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aan_2021_08_001
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40675_015_0029_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_athoracsur_2018_02_008
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_jvca_2023_02_012
crossref_primary_10_1097_CIN_0000000000000365
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12874_021_01288_9
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000726
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1528-1140
ExternalDocumentID 24836149
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.-D
.3C
.55
.GJ
.XZ
.Z2
01R
0R~
1J1
23M
2WC
354
3O-
40H
4Q1
4Q2
4Q3
53G
5GY
5VS
6J9
71W
77Y
7O~
AAAAV
AAAXR
AAEJM
AAFWJ
AAGIX
AAHPQ
AAIQE
AAJCS
AAMOA
AAMTA
AAQKA
AARTV
AASCR
AASOK
AASXQ
AAUEB
AAXQO
ABASU
ABBUW
ABDIG
ABJNI
ABOCM
ABPMR
ABPPZ
ABPXF
ABVCZ
ABXVJ
ABXYN
ABZAD
ABZZY
ACCJW
ACDDN
ACDOF
ACEWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACILI
ACLDA
ACOAL
ACWDW
ACWRI
ACXJB
ACXNZ
ACZKN
ADBBV
ADFPA
ADGGA
ADHPY
ADNKB
AE3
AE6
AEBDS
AEETU
AENEX
AFBFQ
AFCHL
AFDTB
AFEXH
AFMBP
AFNMH
AFSOK
AFUWQ
AGINI
AHJKT
AHOMT
AHQNM
AHQVU
AHRYX
AHVBC
AI.
AIJEX
AINUH
AJCLO
AJIOK
AJJEV
AJNWD
AJNYG
AJZMW
AKCTQ
AKULP
ALKUP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALMTX
AMJPA
AMKUR
AMNEI
AOHHW
AOQMC
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
BAWUL
BOYCO
BQLVK
BS7
BYPQX
C45
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
DIK
DIWNM
DUNZO
E.X
E3Z
EBS
ECM
EEVPB
EIF
EJD
ERAAH
EX3
F2K
F2L
F2M
F2N
F5P
FCALG
FEDTE
FL-
FW0
GNXGY
GQDEL
H0~
HLJTE
HVGLF
HZ~
IH2
IKREB
IKYAY
IN~
IPNFZ
J5H
JF7
JF9
JG8
JK3
JK8
K-A
K-F
K8S
KD2
KMI
L-C
L7B
M18
N4W
N9A
NPM
N~7
N~B
N~M
O9-
OAG
OAH
OBH
OCB
OCUKA
ODA
ODMTH
OGEVE
OHH
OHYEH
OK1
OL1
OLB
OLG
OLH
OLU
OLV
OLY
OLZ
OPUJH
ORVUJ
OUVQU
OVD
OVDNE
OVIDH
OVLEI
OVOZU
OWBYB
OWU
OWV
OWW
OWX
OWY
OWZ
OXXIT
P-K
P2P
R58
RIG
RLZ
RPM
RXW
S4R
S4S
T8P
TAF
TEORI
TR2
TSPGW
UQX
V2I
VH1
VVN
W3M
WH7
WOQ
WOW
X3V
X3W
X7M
XXN
XYM
YFH
YOC
ZFV
ZGI
ZXP
ZY1
ZZMQN
~H1
7X8
ADKSD
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4266-ec43c4a0627fb78e832aac814a14f6f6f2c87caa6bb7edfecbd79c740a0befd82
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISICitedReferencesCount 7
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000345217200013&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1528-1140
IngestDate Mon Sep 08 17:42:54 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:04:07 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4266-ec43c4a0627fb78e832aac814a14f6f6f2c87caa6bb7edfecbd79c740a0befd82
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 24836149
PQID 1624933063
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1624933063
pubmed_primary_24836149
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2014-December
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2014-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2014
  text: 2014-December
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Annals of surgery
PublicationTitleAlternate Ann Surg
PublicationYear 2014
SSID ssj0014807
Score 2.1894298
Snippet Hospital surgical care is complex and subject to unwarranted variation. As part of a multiyear effort, we sought to reduce variability in intraoperative care...
Hospital surgical care is complex and subject to unwarranted variation.BACKGROUNDHospital surgical care is complex and subject to unwarranted variation.As part...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 1011
SubjectTerms Aged
Automatic Data Processing - methods
Cardiac Surgical Procedures
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Intensive Care Units
Intraoperative Care - standards
Intubation, Intratracheal
Male
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Respiration, Artificial - methods
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Title Standardized practice design with electronic support mechanisms for surgical process improvement: reducing mechanical ventilation time
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24836149
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1624933063
Volume 260
WOSCitedRecordID wos000345217200013&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1JS8QwFA7qePDigtu4EcFrmLbJJKkXGcTBgw4DozC3kmaBHuzUqePBH-Dv9iVtmZMg2EIPpYGSvr73vfVD6AZMpqNimBAaKUsYs5QoYRJiuOJ-5B2zXAeyCTGZyPk8nbYBt7otq-x0YlDUZqF9jHwQc3AUwPnm9K56J541ymdXWwqNTdSjAGV8SZeYr7MIbbs0mCjwlMCT6FrnUjGYPY2a0YXdIRL-O8gMxma899_X3Ee7LczEo0YuDtCGLQ_R96yNGxRf1uCuPwqbUMSBfUQWr1lxcL2qPDbHb9Y3Bxf1W40B4MLtZVCWuGpaDHARwhIhyniLl34SLFjDbpV_MFRUNiV32FPZH6HX8cPL_SNpeRiI9vabWM2oZsoPNHa5kBaUgFJaxkzFzHE4Ey2FVornubDGWZ0bkWrBIhXl1hmZHKOtclHaU4S1SW08dCxyxmMDqahULgWIxpzgQ2366Lrb1gzk3CcvVGkXqzpbb2wfnTTfJquagRxZwiQFmJGe_WH1OdoBzMOaipQL1HPwl9tLtK0_P4p6eRUECK6T6fMPYanUKA
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Standardized+practice+design+with+electronic+support+mechanisms+for+surgical+process+improvement%3A+reducing+mechanical+ventilation+time&rft.jtitle=Annals+of+surgery&rft.au=Cook%2C+David+J&rft.au=Pulido%2C+Juan+N&rft.au=Thompson%2C+Jeffrey+E&rft.au=Dearani%2C+Joseph+A&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.issn=1528-1140&rft.eissn=1528-1140&rft.volume=260&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1011&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FSLA.0000000000000726&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1528-1140&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1528-1140&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1528-1140&client=summon