Safe-Testing Algorithm for Individual-Donation Nucleic Acid Testing: 10 Years of Experience in a Low-Prevalence Country

A highly sensitive and specific nucleic acid test (NAT) for the blood-borne viruses human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C (HCV), and hepatitis B (HBV) is essential for the safety of blood components. Since more than 2 decades, NAT screening of blood donations has become standard in develop...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy Ročník 46; číslo 2; s. 104
Hlavní autoři: Stolz, Martin, Gowland, Peter, Tinguely, Caroline, Niederhauser, Christoph
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Switzerland 01.04.2019
Témata:
ISSN:1660-3796
On-line přístup:Zjistit podrobnosti o přístupu
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract A highly sensitive and specific nucleic acid test (NAT) for the blood-borne viruses human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C (HCV), and hepatitis B (HBV) is essential for the safety of blood components. Since more than 2 decades, NAT screening of blood donations has become standard in developed countries that have implemented the individual-donation (ID-NAT) and mini-pool NAT (MP-NAT) approaches. With this powerful technique, confirmation of initial reactive (IR) NAT samples becomes a challenge. Different algorithms are currently in use to eliminate false reactive results. To show that the algorithm implemented in 2007, that uses repeat testing of IR samples in duplicate runs, is a safe strategy, especially in low endemic countries, data from a 10-year experience of ID-NAT were extensively analyzed when follow-up data were available. From July 2007 to December 2014, the Procleix Ultrio assay on a Procleix Tigris system, and from January 2015 to December 2017, the cobas MPX on a cobas 8800 platform, were used for ID-NAT screening. All IR samples were subjected to repeat testing in duplicate independent runs. Only when both tests remained negative were the products released. Donor data from the last 10 years were investigated retrospectively, looking for the reoccurrence of a reactive result in a follow-up sample. Only those donors with at least an x + 1 donation result were included for the confirmation of a false reactive result. From the 1,830,657 donations tested, 2,450 samples were IR (0.13%); only 228 were repeat reactive ([RR], 18 HIV, 61 HCV, and 149 HBV samples), and 2,222 were non-RR (0.12%). Follow-up data were available from 1,267 donors (57%) for further analysis. All except one of these donors were ID-NAT-negative in all follow-up samples. The one exception was from a donor who acquired a fresh HBV infection 10 years after the IR donation (in the x + 28 donation) and subsequently seroconverted. Subsequent serological tests from all succeeding donations (x + 1, x + 2, etc.) were negative in all the other cases, proving that no seroconversion took place after the IR ID-NAT result. The algorithm to deal with IR ID-NAT donations using duplicate repeat testing is very safe and cost-effective in low-prevalence countries. There is no unnecessary destruction of blood products, no counseling of false reactive donors, and also no need to add further complexity to the screening algorithm.
AbstractList A highly sensitive and specific nucleic acid test (NAT) for the blood-borne viruses human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C (HCV), and hepatitis B (HBV) is essential for the safety of blood components. Since more than 2 decades, NAT screening of blood donations has become standard in developed countries that have implemented the individual-donation (ID-NAT) and mini-pool NAT (MP-NAT) approaches. With this powerful technique, confirmation of initial reactive (IR) NAT samples becomes a challenge. Different algorithms are currently in use to eliminate false reactive results. To show that the algorithm implemented in 2007, that uses repeat testing of IR samples in duplicate runs, is a safe strategy, especially in low endemic countries, data from a 10-year experience of ID-NAT were extensively analyzed when follow-up data were available.INTRODUCTIONA highly sensitive and specific nucleic acid test (NAT) for the blood-borne viruses human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C (HCV), and hepatitis B (HBV) is essential for the safety of blood components. Since more than 2 decades, NAT screening of blood donations has become standard in developed countries that have implemented the individual-donation (ID-NAT) and mini-pool NAT (MP-NAT) approaches. With this powerful technique, confirmation of initial reactive (IR) NAT samples becomes a challenge. Different algorithms are currently in use to eliminate false reactive results. To show that the algorithm implemented in 2007, that uses repeat testing of IR samples in duplicate runs, is a safe strategy, especially in low endemic countries, data from a 10-year experience of ID-NAT were extensively analyzed when follow-up data were available.From July 2007 to December 2014, the Procleix Ultrio assay on a Procleix Tigris system, and from January 2015 to December 2017, the cobas MPX on a cobas 8800 platform, were used for ID-NAT screening. All IR samples were subjected to repeat testing in duplicate independent runs. Only when both tests remained negative were the products released. Donor data from the last 10 years were investigated retrospectively, looking for the reoccurrence of a reactive result in a follow-up sample. Only those donors with at least an x + 1 donation result were included for the confirmation of a false reactive result.METHODSFrom July 2007 to December 2014, the Procleix Ultrio assay on a Procleix Tigris system, and from January 2015 to December 2017, the cobas MPX on a cobas 8800 platform, were used for ID-NAT screening. All IR samples were subjected to repeat testing in duplicate independent runs. Only when both tests remained negative were the products released. Donor data from the last 10 years were investigated retrospectively, looking for the reoccurrence of a reactive result in a follow-up sample. Only those donors with at least an x + 1 donation result were included for the confirmation of a false reactive result.From the 1,830,657 donations tested, 2,450 samples were IR (0.13%); only 228 were repeat reactive ([RR], 18 HIV, 61 HCV, and 149 HBV samples), and 2,222 were non-RR (0.12%). Follow-up data were available from 1,267 donors (57%) for further analysis. All except one of these donors were ID-NAT-negative in all follow-up samples. The one exception was from a donor who acquired a fresh HBV infection 10 years after the IR donation (in the x + 28 donation) and subsequently seroconverted. Subsequent serological tests from all succeeding donations (x + 1, x + 2, etc.) were negative in all the other cases, proving that no seroconversion took place after the IR ID-NAT result.RESULTSFrom the 1,830,657 donations tested, 2,450 samples were IR (0.13%); only 228 were repeat reactive ([RR], 18 HIV, 61 HCV, and 149 HBV samples), and 2,222 were non-RR (0.12%). Follow-up data were available from 1,267 donors (57%) for further analysis. All except one of these donors were ID-NAT-negative in all follow-up samples. The one exception was from a donor who acquired a fresh HBV infection 10 years after the IR donation (in the x + 28 donation) and subsequently seroconverted. Subsequent serological tests from all succeeding donations (x + 1, x + 2, etc.) were negative in all the other cases, proving that no seroconversion took place after the IR ID-NAT result.The algorithm to deal with IR ID-NAT donations using duplicate repeat testing is very safe and cost-effective in low-prevalence countries. There is no unnecessary destruction of blood products, no counseling of false reactive donors, and also no need to add further complexity to the screening algorithm.CONCLUSIONSThe algorithm to deal with IR ID-NAT donations using duplicate repeat testing is very safe and cost-effective in low-prevalence countries. There is no unnecessary destruction of blood products, no counseling of false reactive donors, and also no need to add further complexity to the screening algorithm.
A highly sensitive and specific nucleic acid test (NAT) for the blood-borne viruses human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C (HCV), and hepatitis B (HBV) is essential for the safety of blood components. Since more than 2 decades, NAT screening of blood donations has become standard in developed countries that have implemented the individual-donation (ID-NAT) and mini-pool NAT (MP-NAT) approaches. With this powerful technique, confirmation of initial reactive (IR) NAT samples becomes a challenge. Different algorithms are currently in use to eliminate false reactive results. To show that the algorithm implemented in 2007, that uses repeat testing of IR samples in duplicate runs, is a safe strategy, especially in low endemic countries, data from a 10-year experience of ID-NAT were extensively analyzed when follow-up data were available. From July 2007 to December 2014, the Procleix Ultrio assay on a Procleix Tigris system, and from January 2015 to December 2017, the cobas MPX on a cobas 8800 platform, were used for ID-NAT screening. All IR samples were subjected to repeat testing in duplicate independent runs. Only when both tests remained negative were the products released. Donor data from the last 10 years were investigated retrospectively, looking for the reoccurrence of a reactive result in a follow-up sample. Only those donors with at least an x + 1 donation result were included for the confirmation of a false reactive result. From the 1,830,657 donations tested, 2,450 samples were IR (0.13%); only 228 were repeat reactive ([RR], 18 HIV, 61 HCV, and 149 HBV samples), and 2,222 were non-RR (0.12%). Follow-up data were available from 1,267 donors (57%) for further analysis. All except one of these donors were ID-NAT-negative in all follow-up samples. The one exception was from a donor who acquired a fresh HBV infection 10 years after the IR donation (in the x + 28 donation) and subsequently seroconverted. Subsequent serological tests from all succeeding donations (x + 1, x + 2, etc.) were negative in all the other cases, proving that no seroconversion took place after the IR ID-NAT result. The algorithm to deal with IR ID-NAT donations using duplicate repeat testing is very safe and cost-effective in low-prevalence countries. There is no unnecessary destruction of blood products, no counseling of false reactive donors, and also no need to add further complexity to the screening algorithm.
Author Gowland, Peter
Niederhauser, Christoph
Stolz, Martin
Tinguely, Caroline
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Martin
  surname: Stolz
  fullname: Stolz, Martin
  organization: Interregional Blood Transfusion SRC, Laboratory Diagnostics, Bern, Switzerland
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Peter
  surname: Gowland
  fullname: Gowland, Peter
  organization: Interregional Blood Transfusion SRC, Laboratory Diagnostics, Bern, Switzerland
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Caroline
  surname: Tinguely
  fullname: Tinguely, Caroline
  organization: Interregional Blood Transfusion SRC, Laboratory Diagnostics, Bern, Switzerland
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Christoph
  surname: Niederhauser
  fullname: Niederhauser, Christoph
  organization: Faculté de biologie et de médecine, Universite de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31191196$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNo1kEtPwzAQhH0oog848AeQj1wCfiROzK0qBSpFgEQ5cIocP4pRYhc7aem_J4IijXak0ber1UzByHmnAbjA6BrjjN8ghFLOMWMjMBkmSmjO2RhMY_xEiKQFJadgTDHmg9gE7F-F0clax866DZw3Gx9s99FC4wNcOWV3VvWiSe68E531Dj71stFWwrm0Ch7XbiFG8F2LEKE3cPm91cFqJzW0DgpY-n3yEvRONL_ZwveuC4czcGJEE_X50Wfg7X65Xjwm5fPDajEvE5mStEsUVURyzHNSSKMoV7VheY6MyQoiFeGiRsLUheSFyevMpFgTyZjMcC7rWjBCZuDq7-42-K9--LdqbZS6aYTTvo8VoelQGM1IPqCXR7SvW62qbbCtCIfqvyzyA5Lfavo
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chieco_2025_102391
crossref_primary_10_1159_000513179
crossref_primary_10_1159_000502552
crossref_primary_10_1159_000525480
crossref_primary_10_3389_fimmu_2022_754383
ContentType Journal Article
DBID NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1159/000499166
DatabaseName PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
ExternalDocumentID 31191196
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
0~5
0~B
123
30W
328
3O.
4.4
53G
8UI
AAYIC
ABBTS
ABJNI
ABPAZ
ABWCG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACPSR
ADBBV
AENEX
AEYAO
AFJJK
AHFRZ
ALDHI
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
AZPMC
CAG
COF
CS3
CYUIP
DU5
E0A
EBS
EJD
FB.
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HYE
HZ~
IAO
IHR
INH
ITC
IY7
KUZGX
M--
N9A
NPM
O1H
O9-
OK1
RIG
RKO
RPM
RXVBD
UJ6
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-d3d2c919728cfd39dbf6770ff582cd29ab0afb8c98f7b5f41e2c66c517cbba622
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISICitedReferencesCount 8
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000464389300006&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1660-3796
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 12:24:02 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:27:04 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords Individual donations
Blood-borne viruses
Mini-pools
Nucleic acid test
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c424t-d3d2c919728cfd39dbf6770ff582cd29ab0afb8c98f7b5f41e2c66c517cbba622
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/499166
PMID 31191196
PQID 2340043527
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2340043527
pubmed_primary_31191196
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2019-04-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2019-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2019
  text: 2019-04-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Switzerland
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Switzerland
PublicationTitle Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy
PublicationTitleAlternate Transfus Med Hemother
PublicationYear 2019
SSID ssj0024832
Score 2.1836472
Snippet A highly sensitive and specific nucleic acid test (NAT) for the blood-borne viruses human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C (HCV), and hepatitis B...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 104
Title Safe-Testing Algorithm for Individual-Donation Nucleic Acid Testing: 10 Years of Experience in a Low-Prevalence Country
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31191196
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2340043527
Volume 46
WOSCitedRecordID wos000464389300006&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8QwEA7qinjx_VhfRPAa3LZpHl5kEUXBXQQV1tOSTJp1QVu11cV_b9JG9-JB8NJbmpJ8M_N1kvkGoSOIklQZ5piboIpQQzWRmTd3CQk1lilNVd1sgvf7YjCQNyHhVoZrld8-sXbUpgCfIz-OE482Rxf46csr8V2j_OlqaKExi1qJozIe1Xwgplp7om5QFjHmJueSBWUhF8GPG64fBXHEX5llHWEulv_7bStoKXBL3G3AsIpmsnwNLfTC6fk6mtwqm5E7r6uRj3D3aeTeUT0-Y8db8dVPYRbx6WK_XbjvtY7HgLswNjgMO8FRBz848yhxYfFUKBmPc6zwdTEhXhRK1aVM2Be8V2-fG-j-4vzu7JKExgsEaEwrYhITg_QNyQRYk0ijLeO8Y20qYjCxVLqjrBYgheU6tTTKYmAM0oiD1orF8Saay4s820bYUJ7qKMoSxV281EpzUKl1_3jKgQEEtNHh95IOHbD9aYXKs-K9HE4XtY22mn0ZvjQKHMPEy9I537Hzh9G7aNGRHNncttlDLevMOttH8_BRjcu3gxox7tm_6X0Bd8zMVg
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safe-Testing+Algorithm+for+Individual-Donation+Nucleic+Acid+Testing%3A+10+Years+of+Experience+in+a+Low-Prevalence+Country&rft.jtitle=Transfusion+medicine+and+hemotherapy&rft.au=Stolz%2C+Martin&rft.au=Gowland%2C+Peter&rft.au=Tinguely%2C+Caroline&rft.au=Niederhauser%2C+Christoph&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.issn=1660-3796&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=104&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159%2F000499166&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F31191196&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F31191196&rft.externalDocID=31191196
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1660-3796&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1660-3796&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1660-3796&client=summon