Opposing views: associations of political polarization, political party affiliation, and social trust with COVID-19 vaccination intent and receipt
Political polarization has increased in the USA within recent years. Studies have shown Republicans are less likely to accept COVID-19 vaccinations than Democrats; however, little is known regarding the association between COVID-19 vaccination acceptance and political polarization. We used data from...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | Journal of public health (Oxford, England) Ročník 45; číslo 1; s. 36 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
England
14.03.2023
|
| Témata: | |
| ISSN: | 1741-3850, 1741-3850 |
| On-line přístup: | Zjistit podrobnosti o přístupu |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Abstract | Political polarization has increased in the USA within recent years. Studies have shown Republicans are less likely to accept COVID-19 vaccinations than Democrats; however, little is known regarding the association between COVID-19 vaccination acceptance and political polarization.
We used data from a nationally-representative survey of 1427 participants conducted between 9 February 2021 and 17 February 2021. We estimated multivariate-adjusted odds ratios for COVID-19 vaccination intent and receipt according to perceived political polarization (measured as the perceived size of the ideological gap between Democrats and Republicans), political party affiliation, and social trust, controlling for demographic and socioeconomic factors.
Among participants perceiving high levels of polarization, Republicans (versus Democrats) reported a 90% lower odds of vaccination intent (OR = 0.10 [0.05, 0.19], P < 0.001). Participants with high (versus low) social trust and low perceived polarization had a 2-folder higher vaccination intent (OR = 2.39 [1.34, 4.21], P = 0.003); this association was substantially weaker in the high perceived polarization group.
High perceived levels of political polarization appear to magnify the decrease in the odds of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine and the intent to get vaccinated among Republicans versus Democrats. Political polarization may further attenuate the protective associations of high social capital with vaccination. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Political polarization has increased in the USA within recent years. Studies have shown Republicans are less likely to accept COVID-19 vaccinations than Democrats; however, little is known regarding the association between COVID-19 vaccination acceptance and political polarization.INTRODUCTIONPolitical polarization has increased in the USA within recent years. Studies have shown Republicans are less likely to accept COVID-19 vaccinations than Democrats; however, little is known regarding the association between COVID-19 vaccination acceptance and political polarization.We used data from a nationally-representative survey of 1427 participants conducted between 9 February 2021 and 17 February 2021. We estimated multivariate-adjusted odds ratios for COVID-19 vaccination intent and receipt according to perceived political polarization (measured as the perceived size of the ideological gap between Democrats and Republicans), political party affiliation, and social trust, controlling for demographic and socioeconomic factors.METHODSWe used data from a nationally-representative survey of 1427 participants conducted between 9 February 2021 and 17 February 2021. We estimated multivariate-adjusted odds ratios for COVID-19 vaccination intent and receipt according to perceived political polarization (measured as the perceived size of the ideological gap between Democrats and Republicans), political party affiliation, and social trust, controlling for demographic and socioeconomic factors.Among participants perceiving high levels of polarization, Republicans (versus Democrats) reported a 90% lower odds of vaccination intent (OR = 0.10 [0.05, 0.19], P < 0.001). Participants with high (versus low) social trust and low perceived polarization had a 2-folder higher vaccination intent (OR = 2.39 [1.34, 4.21], P = 0.003); this association was substantially weaker in the high perceived polarization group.RESULTSAmong participants perceiving high levels of polarization, Republicans (versus Democrats) reported a 90% lower odds of vaccination intent (OR = 0.10 [0.05, 0.19], P < 0.001). Participants with high (versus low) social trust and low perceived polarization had a 2-folder higher vaccination intent (OR = 2.39 [1.34, 4.21], P = 0.003); this association was substantially weaker in the high perceived polarization group.High perceived levels of political polarization appear to magnify the decrease in the odds of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine and the intent to get vaccinated among Republicans versus Democrats. Political polarization may further attenuate the protective associations of high social capital with vaccination.CONCLUSIONSHigh perceived levels of political polarization appear to magnify the decrease in the odds of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine and the intent to get vaccinated among Republicans versus Democrats. Political polarization may further attenuate the protective associations of high social capital with vaccination. Political polarization has increased in the USA within recent years. Studies have shown Republicans are less likely to accept COVID-19 vaccinations than Democrats; however, little is known regarding the association between COVID-19 vaccination acceptance and political polarization. We used data from a nationally-representative survey of 1427 participants conducted between 9 February 2021 and 17 February 2021. We estimated multivariate-adjusted odds ratios for COVID-19 vaccination intent and receipt according to perceived political polarization (measured as the perceived size of the ideological gap between Democrats and Republicans), political party affiliation, and social trust, controlling for demographic and socioeconomic factors. Among participants perceiving high levels of polarization, Republicans (versus Democrats) reported a 90% lower odds of vaccination intent (OR = 0.10 [0.05, 0.19], P < 0.001). Participants with high (versus low) social trust and low perceived polarization had a 2-folder higher vaccination intent (OR = 2.39 [1.34, 4.21], P = 0.003); this association was substantially weaker in the high perceived polarization group. High perceived levels of political polarization appear to magnify the decrease in the odds of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine and the intent to get vaccinated among Republicans versus Democrats. Political polarization may further attenuate the protective associations of high social capital with vaccination. |
| Author | Kim, Daniel Aldrich, Daniel P Panagopoulos, Costas Fraser, Timothy Dolman, Andrew J |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Andrew J surname: Dolman fullname: Dolman, Andrew J organization: Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: Timothy surname: Fraser fullname: Fraser, Timothy organization: College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Northeastern University, Boston, MA USA – sequence: 3 givenname: Costas surname: Panagopoulos fullname: Panagopoulos, Costas organization: College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Northeastern University, Boston, MA USA – sequence: 4 givenname: Daniel P surname: Aldrich fullname: Aldrich, Daniel P organization: School of Public Policy and Urban Affairs, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA – sequence: 5 givenname: Daniel orcidid: 0000-0001-8907-6420 surname: Kim fullname: Kim, Daniel organization: School of Public Policy and Urban Affairs, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35077546$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNpNkDtPwzAUhS1URB-wMiKPDITajp24bKi8KlXqAqzRTWyDUWqH2GlVfga_GAhFYrpH93znDGeMBs47jdApJZeUzNJp05VrraZGQckJPUAjmnOapFKQwT89ROMQ3ghhM0bEERqmguS54NkIfa6axgfrXvDG6m24whCCryxE613A3uDG1zbaCuofBa396K2L_39o4w6DMba2exOcwn1NjWPbhYi3Nr7i-ep5cZPQGd5AVVnXs9i6qF3sE62utG3iMTo0UAd9sr8T9HR3-zh_SJar-8X8eplUnPGYcM1YlSulSCqhlLkxMi21YErKjAMBnROhVFlKok0uJTdUGEY4ByoIqIyzCTr_7W1a_97pEIu1DZWua3Dad6FgGWOzLCWcfKNne7Sfu2hau4Z2V_ztyL4ALUx64A |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1017_pls_2023_8 crossref_primary_10_1093_pnasnexus_pgaf184 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0300872 crossref_primary_10_1177_07352751251326951 crossref_primary_10_12688_f1000research_145852_1 crossref_primary_10_1093_pnasnexus_pgac011 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41541_024_00962_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijdrr_2024_104891 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_socscimed_2024_116557 crossref_primary_10_1080_21645515_2025_2533639 crossref_primary_10_1093_ijpor_edae039 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph192214655 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12982_025_00501_0 crossref_primary_10_3390_vaccines11030517 crossref_primary_10_1093_eurpub_ckae002 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10389_023_02107_9 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pgph_0005180 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ypmed_2022_107269 crossref_primary_10_1177_17456916231190395 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12119_025_10433_1 crossref_primary_10_1111_aphw_12480 crossref_primary_10_1056_NEJMra2106441 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ypmed_2024_108158 crossref_primary_10_1186_s41927_023_00338_7 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0307771 crossref_primary_10_1093_pubmed_fdaf004 crossref_primary_10_1177_10793739251322423 crossref_primary_10_1093_pubmed_fdad045 crossref_primary_10_1111_soc4_13126 crossref_primary_10_1177_13684302231180525 crossref_primary_10_1080_10410236_2024_2312614 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2024_1327704 crossref_primary_10_1177_23780231231224634 crossref_primary_10_1093_jamiaopen_ooad023 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. |
| DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1093/pubmed/fdab401 |
| DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | no_fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Public Health |
| EISSN | 1741-3850 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 35077546 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- -E4 ..I .2P .I3 .ZR 04C 0R~ 1TH 29L 2WC 4.4 482 48X 53G 5RE 5VS 5WA 5WD 6PF 70D A8Z AABZA AACZT AAJKP AAMVS AAOGV AAPNW AAPQZ AAPXW AARHZ AAUAY AAVAP AAWTL ABDFA ABEJV ABEUO ABGNP ABIXL ABJNI ABKDP ABNHQ ABNKS ABPTD ABQLI ABVGC ABWST ABXVV ABYLZ ABZBJ ACGFS ACHQT ACUFI ACUTJ ACUTO ACVHY ADBBV ADEYI ADEZT ADGZP ADHKW ADHZD ADIPN ADJQC ADOCK ADOJX ADQBN ADRIX ADRTK ADVEK ADYVW ADZXQ AEGPL AEJOX AEKSI AEMDU AENEX AENZO AEPUE AETBJ AEWNT AFFZL AFIYH AFOFC AFXEN AGINJ AGKEF AGQXC AGSYK AHMBA AHMMS AHXPO AIJHB AJEEA ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQC APIBT APWMN ATGXG AXUDD BAWUL BAYMD BCRHZ BEYMZ BHONS BMSDO BTRTY BVRKM BWUDY C45 CDBKE CGR CNZYI CS3 CUY CVF CZ4 DAKXR DIK DILTD DU5 D~K EBD EBS ECF ECM ECT EE~ EIF EIHBH F5P F9B FLUFQ FOEOM FOTVD FQBLK FTKQU GAUVT GJXCC H13 H5~ HAR HW0 HZ~ IOX J21 KAQDR KOP KQ8 KSI KSN L7B M-Z N9A NGC NOMLY NOYVH NPJNY NPM NU- O9- OAWHX OCZFY ODMLO OHH OJQWA OJZSN OK1 OPAEJ OVD OWPYF PAFKI PEELM PQQKQ Q1. Q5Y R44 RD5 ROL ROX RUSNO RW1 RXO TEORI TJX TMA W8F X7H YAYTL YKOAZ YROCO YXANX ZKX ~91 7X8 AAILS ABPQP ADCFL ADNBA AEHKS AFCKW AGQZG AHGBF AJBYB AJNCP ALXQX AMHCJ ESTFP JXSIZ |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-4e22c7ddd038ab87ff83be52d8864a0ae705ddbb80ef7884f15f2044a150ad642 |
| IEDL.DBID | 7X8 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 48 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000952609500012&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1741-3850 |
| IngestDate | Thu Oct 02 11:03:27 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:24:07 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Language | English |
| License | The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c424t-4e22c7ddd038ab87ff83be52d8864a0ae705ddbb80ef7884f15f2044a150ad642 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-8907-6420 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://academic.oup.com/jpubhealth/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdab401/42269152/fdab401.pdf |
| PMID | 35077546 |
| PQID | 2622963040 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2622963040 pubmed_primary_35077546 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2023-03-14 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-03-14 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2023 text: 2023-03-14 day: 14 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | England |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of public health (Oxford, England) |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J Public Health (Oxf) |
| PublicationYear | 2023 |
| References | 35373839 - J Public Health (Oxf). 2023 Mar 14;45(1):e138-e139 |
| References_xml | – reference: 35373839 - J Public Health (Oxf). 2023 Mar 14;45(1):e138-e139 |
| SSID | ssj0029205 |
| Score | 2.5334058 |
| Snippet | Political polarization has increased in the USA within recent years. Studies have shown Republicans are less likely to accept COVID-19 vaccinations than... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
| StartPage | 36 |
| SubjectTerms | COVID-19 - epidemiology COVID-19 - prevention & control COVID-19 Vaccines - therapeutic use Humans Intention Politics Trust |
| Title | Opposing views: associations of political polarization, political party affiliation, and social trust with COVID-19 vaccination intent and receipt |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35077546 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2622963040 |
| Volume | 45 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000952609500012&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1JS8NAFB7UehDEfakbI3h0aJKZJBMvItWioG0PKr2FySwSkCSaWvBv-IudJW29CIKXHBImhHlf3rz3vQ2AM5HwjCdUmLRBhQjnIco450jFkgoqiKK2pdDzfdzv09EoGTaEW92kVU51olXUouSGI-8EURBosGjMXVZvyEyNMtHVZoTGImhhbcoYVMejWRTBDGIKXUGkjzANvVnTRtxxp01HCZYRz__dvLTHTG_9vx-4AdYaAxNeOURsggVZbIFVx85BV3S0Db4GlcnWKl6g7UV6AdlcSjUsFaxcWpx-UWV836ZY8_znfY25T8iUyl_z5iErBHQcPLSlHNCQvLA7eL67Rn4CJ4zz3JGP0HSpKMZ2hVa5UiuuHfDUu3ns3qJmOgPiJCBjRGQQ8FgI4WHKMhorRXEmw0BQGhHmMRl7oRBZRj2ptJ9NlB-qwCOEaROUCe327IKloizkPoCYmyAyy7CnpUGTMPFVpO00bamIRBFB2-B0uuWpRr8JabBClh91Ot_0Nthzcksr16YjxaFt7xcd_GH1IVgxc-RNcplPjkBL6X9fHoNlPhnn9fuJhZW-9ocP3yWb3Ck |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Opposing+views%3A+associations+of+political+polarization%2C+political+party+affiliation%2C+and+social+trust+with+COVID-19+vaccination+intent+and+receipt&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+public+health+%28Oxford%2C+England%29&rft.au=Dolman%2C+Andrew+J&rft.au=Fraser%2C+Timothy&rft.au=Panagopoulos%2C+Costas&rft.au=Aldrich%2C+Daniel+P&rft.date=2023-03-14&rft.issn=1741-3850&rft.eissn=1741-3850&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=36&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Fpubmed%2Ffdab401&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1741-3850&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1741-3850&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1741-3850&client=summon |