Public Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics in Medicine

To understand better the public perception and comprehension of medical technology such as artificial intelligence (AI) and robotic surgery. In addition to this, to identify sensitivity to their use to ensure acceptability and quality of counseling. A survey was conducted on a convenience sample of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of endourology Jg. 34; H. 10; S. 1041
Hauptverfasser: Stai, Bethany, Heller, Nick, McSweeney, Sean, Rickman, Jack, Blake, Paul, Vasdev, Ranveer, Edgerton, Zach, Tejpaul, Resha, Peterson, Matt, Rosenberg, Joel, Kalapara, Arveen, Regmi, Subodh, Papanikolopoulos, Nikolaos, Weight, Christopher
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: United States 01.10.2020
Schlagworte:
Artificial Intelligence
Female
Humans
Male
Medicine
Minnesota
Public Opinion
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Robotics
Minnesota
patient counseling
active surveillance
artificial intelligence
robotic surgery
ISSN:1557-900X, 1557-900X
Online-Zugang:Weitere Angaben
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To understand better the public perception and comprehension of medical technology such as artificial intelligence (AI) and robotic surgery. In addition to this, to identify sensitivity to their use to ensure acceptability and quality of counseling. A survey was conducted on a convenience sample of visitors to the MN Minnesota State Fair (  = 264). Participants were randomized to receive one of two similar surveys. In the first, a diagnosis was made by a physician and in the second by an AI application to compare confidence in human and computer-based diagnosis. The median age of participants was 45 (interquartile range 28-59), 58% were female (  = 154) 42% male (  = 110), 69% had completed at least a bachelor's degree, 88% were Caucasian (  = 233) 12% ethnic minorities (  = 31) and were from 12 states, mostly from the Upper Midwest. Participants had nearly equal trust in AI physician diagnoses. However, they were significantly more likely to trust an AI diagnosis of cancer over a doctor's diagnosis when responding to the version of the survey that suggested that an AI could make medical diagnoses (  = 9.32e-06). Though 55% of respondents (  = 145) reported that they were uncomfortable with automated robotic surgery, the majority of the individuals surveyed (88%) mistakenly believed that partially autonomous surgery was already happening. Almost all (94%,  = 249) stated that they would be willing to pay for a review of medical imaging by an AI if available. Most participants express confidence in AI providing medical diagnoses, sometimes even over human physicians. Participants generally express concern with surgical AI, but they mistakenly believe that it is already being performed. As AI applications increase in medical practice, health care providers should be cognizant of the potential amount of misinformation and sensitivity that patients have to how such technology is represented.
Bibliographie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1557-900X
1557-900X
DOI:10.1089/end.2020.0137