On the Problem of Evaluating the Performance of Multiprogrammed Workloads

Multithreaded architectures are becoming more and more popular. In order to evaluate their behavior, several methodologies and metrics have been proposed. A methodology defines when the measurements for a given workload execution are taken. A metric combines those measurements to obtain a final eval...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:IEEE transactions on computers Ročník 59; číslo 12; s. 1722 - 1728
Hlavní autoři: Cazorla, F J, Pajuelo, A, Santana, O J, Fernandez, E, Valero, M
Médium: Journal Article Publikace
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: New York IEEE 01.12.2010
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Témata:
ISSN:0018-9340, 1557-9956
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Multithreaded architectures are becoming more and more popular. In order to evaluate their behavior, several methodologies and metrics have been proposed. A methodology defines when the measurements for a given workload execution are taken. A metric combines those measurements to obtain a final evaluation result. However, since current evaluation methodologies do not provide representative measurements for these metrics, the analysis and evaluation of novel ideas could be either unfair or misleading. Given the potential impact of multithreaded architectures on current and future processor designs, it is crucial to develop an accurate evaluation methodology for them. This paper presents FAME, a new evaluation methodology aimed to fairly measure the performance of multithreaded processors executing multiprogrammed workloads. FAME reexecutes all programs in the workload until all of them are fairly represented in the final measurements taken. We compare FAME with previously used methodologies showing that it provides more accurate measurements, becoming an ideal evaluation methodology to analyze proposals for multithreaded architectures.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0018-9340
1557-9956
DOI:10.1109/TC.2010.62