The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project: History, uses, and structural effects on climate research

The results of the sixth phase of the coupled model intercomparison project (CMIP) are currently being analyzed and will form the basis of the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report. Since its creation in the mid‐1990s, CMIP has had an increasing influence on climate research. While the principle behind it ha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Climate change Vol. 11; no. 4; pp. e648 - n/a
Main Authors: Touzé‐Peiffer, Ludovic, Barberousse, Anouk, Le Treut, Hervé
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.07.2020
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Wiley
Subjects:
ISSN:1757-7780, 1757-7799, 1757-7799
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract The results of the sixth phase of the coupled model intercomparison project (CMIP) are currently being analyzed and will form the basis of the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report. Since its creation in the mid‐1990s, CMIP has had an increasing influence on climate research. While the principle behind it has always remained the same—comparing different climate models under similar conditions—its design and motivations have evolved significantly over the phases of the project. This evolution is closely linked to that of the IPCC since, historically as well as today, the results of CMIP have played a major role in the Panel's reports. This role increased the visibility of CMIP. Over time, more and more people started to be interested in CMIP and to analyze its results. Despite this success, the way CMIP is used today raises methodological issues. In fact, CMIP has promoted a particular way of doing climate research, centered on a single tool–Global Coupled Models (GCMs)–and creating a gap between model developers and model users. Due to the debates regarding the interpretation of multi‐model ensembles and the validation of GCMs, whether the emphasis on this particular way of studying climate is serving the progress of climate science is questionable. This article is categorized under: Climate Models and Modeling > Knowledge Generation with Models The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project is at the core of climate research. However, its value for climate research as well as for policy guidance has not been enough subject to an explicit debate. Credit: World Climate Research Programme
AbstractList The results of the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) are currently being analysed and will form the basis of the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report. Since its creation in the mid-1990s, CMIP has had an increasing influence on climate research. While the principle behind it has always remained the same-comparing different climate models under similar conditions-its design and motivations have evolved significantly over the phases of the project. This evolution is closely linked to the one of the IPCC, since, historically as well as today, the results of CMIP have played a major role in the panel reports. This role increased the visibility of CMIP-over time, more and more people started to be interested in CMIP and to analyze its results. Despite this success, the way CMIP is used today raises methodological issues. In fact, CMIP has promoted a particular way of doing climate research, centred on a single tool, Global Coupled Models (GCMs), and creating a gap between model developers and model users. Due to the debates regarding the interpretation of multi-model ensembles and the validation of GCMs, whether the emphasis on this particular way of studying climate is serving the progress of climate science is questionable.
The results of the sixth phase of the coupled model intercomparison project (CMIP) are currently being analyzed and will form the basis of the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report. Since its creation in the mid‐1990s, CMIP has had an increasing influence on climate research. While the principle behind it has always remained the same—comparing different climate models under similar conditions—its design and motivations have evolved significantly over the phases of the project. This evolution is closely linked to that of the IPCC since, historically as well as today, the results of CMIP have played a major role in the Panel's reports. This role increased the visibility of CMIP. Over time, more and more people started to be interested in CMIP and to analyze its results. Despite this success, the way CMIP is used today raises methodological issues. In fact, CMIP has promoted a particular way of doing climate research, centered on a single tool–Global Coupled Models (GCMs)–and creating a gap between model developers and model users. Due to the debates regarding the interpretation of multi‐model ensembles and the validation of GCMs, whether the emphasis on this particular way of studying climate is serving the progress of climate science is questionable.This article is categorized under:Climate Models and Modeling > Knowledge Generation with Models
The results of the sixth phase of the coupled model intercomparison project (CMIP) are currently being analyzed and will form the basis of the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report. Since its creation in the mid‐1990s, CMIP has had an increasing influence on climate research. While the principle behind it has always remained the same—comparing different climate models under similar conditions—its design and motivations have evolved significantly over the phases of the project. This evolution is closely linked to that of the IPCC since, historically as well as today, the results of CMIP have played a major role in the Panel's reports. This role increased the visibility of CMIP. Over time, more and more people started to be interested in CMIP and to analyze its results. Despite this success, the way CMIP is used today raises methodological issues. In fact, CMIP has promoted a particular way of doing climate research, centered on a single tool–Global Coupled Models (GCMs)–and creating a gap between model developers and model users. Due to the debates regarding the interpretation of multi‐model ensembles and the validation of GCMs, whether the emphasis on this particular way of studying climate is serving the progress of climate science is questionable. This article is categorized under: Climate Models and Modeling > Knowledge Generation with Models
The results of the sixth phase of the coupled model intercomparison project (CMIP) are currently being analyzed and will form the basis of the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report. Since its creation in the mid‐1990s, CMIP has had an increasing influence on climate research. While the principle behind it has always remained the same—comparing different climate models under similar conditions—its design and motivations have evolved significantly over the phases of the project. This evolution is closely linked to that of the IPCC since, historically as well as today, the results of CMIP have played a major role in the Panel's reports. This role increased the visibility of CMIP. Over time, more and more people started to be interested in CMIP and to analyze its results. Despite this success, the way CMIP is used today raises methodological issues. In fact, CMIP has promoted a particular way of doing climate research, centered on a single tool–Global Coupled Models (GCMs)–and creating a gap between model developers and model users. Due to the debates regarding the interpretation of multi‐model ensembles and the validation of GCMs, whether the emphasis on this particular way of studying climate is serving the progress of climate science is questionable. This article is categorized under: Climate Models and Modeling > Knowledge Generation with Models The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project is at the core of climate research. However, its value for climate research as well as for policy guidance has not been enough subject to an explicit debate. Credit: World Climate Research Programme
Author Touzé‐Peiffer, Ludovic
Le Treut, Hervé
Barberousse, Anouk
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Ludovic
  orcidid: 0000-0001-5941-3289
  surname: Touzé‐Peiffer
  fullname: Touzé‐Peiffer, Ludovic
  email: ludovic.touze-peiffer@lmd.jussieu.fr
  organization: ENS, PSL Université, École polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, CNRS
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Anouk
  surname: Barberousse
  fullname: Barberousse, Anouk
  organization: Sorbonne Université
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Hervé
  surname: Le Treut
  fullname: Le Treut, Hervé
  organization: ENS, PSL Université, École polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, CNRS
BackLink https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-02878751$$DView record in HAL
BookMark eNp10E9LwzAYBvAgE5w6_AoBDyJaTdIuf7xJUSdM9KB4DFn6lnV0zUxSZd_ejKkHxVwSwu99eXj20aBzHSB0RMkFJYRdflh7wQu5g4ZUjEUmhFKDn7cke2gUwoKkkzMpZTFE1fMccOn6VQsVfnAVtPi-i-CtW66Mb4Lr8JN3C7DxCk-aEJ1fn-M-QDjHpqtwiL63sfemxVDXSQWcJmzbLE0E7CGA8XZ-iHZr0wYYfd0H6OX25rmcZNPHu_vyeprZgjGZMVVzBcALRZURqshn-czWDNhMjikvDFeMFJxxWjNiBHAGfAaVFaAgr3kO-QE63e6dm1avfArh19qZRk-up3rzR5gUUozpO032eGtX3r31EKJeuN53KZ5mBaVjQgRnSWVbZb0LwUOtbRNNbFwXvWlaTYne9K5T7zr1nvzJL_8d468828qPpoX1f0y_luVGfwIsy5G1
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1002_joc_7740
crossref_primary_10_1002_joc_8653
crossref_primary_10_1002_joc_8677
crossref_primary_10_1002_lom3_10655
crossref_primary_10_3390_hydrology12050117
crossref_primary_10_1155_2020_8881118
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2021_148323
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11069_025_07491_x
crossref_primary_10_3390_atmos15040434
crossref_primary_10_1029_2024EF004540
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13194_023_00522_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envsoft_2021_105287
crossref_primary_10_3390_atmos14091429
crossref_primary_10_1029_2022MS003588
crossref_primary_10_2166_wcc_2024_393
crossref_primary_10_3390_cli11050100
crossref_primary_10_1002_adsu_202400097
crossref_primary_10_3390_su17052297
crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture15080826
crossref_primary_10_3390_buildings14020372
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_energy_2025_136564
crossref_primary_10_1515_eng_2022_0567
crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_22_975_2025
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tifs_2021_07_041
crossref_primary_10_1029_2024GL114203
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gr_2025_08_004
crossref_primary_10_3390_su17177686
crossref_primary_10_1002_joc_7973
crossref_primary_10_5194_gmd_18_2639_2025
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11600_024_01429_w
crossref_primary_10_1002_joc_70101
crossref_primary_10_1029_2021GL093197
crossref_primary_10_3390_su17125306
crossref_primary_10_2166_wcc_2022_170
crossref_primary_10_1002_joc_8526
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_atmosres_2022_106554
crossref_primary_10_3847_PSJ_ad5830
crossref_primary_10_1111_nyas_15063
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2023_166820
crossref_primary_10_2166_wcc_2022_224
crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_6953306
crossref_primary_10_3390_w15223895
Cites_doi 10.1175/1520-0493(1978)106<1245:FIFTNW>2.0.CO;2
10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00635.1
10.1029/2011JD016821
10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00135.1
10.1175/2008BAMS2759.1
10.1016/j.shpsb.2010.07.001
10.1029/2018RG000607
10.1007/s10584-014-1176-2
10.1002/qj.2379
10.2307/2026523
10.1002/jame.20027
10.1007/s00382-012-1343-y
10.1175/1520-0477-69.1.40
10.1007/s00382-013-1774-0
10.1029/2011GL046864
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195328318.003.0012
10.1002/2015GL063659
10.1098/rsta.2007.2073
10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1
10.1175/1520-0469(1969)026<0786:CCWACO>2.0.CO;2
10.1175/1520-0477(1999)080<0029:AOOTRO>2.0.CO;2
10.1086/661566
10.1007/s00382-013-1677-0
10.1007/978-94-007-6692-1_14
10.1175/2009BAMS2752.1
10.1007/s10584-010-9800-2
10.1175/JAS-D-12-0336.1
10.1175/BAMS-86-1-89
10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00241.1
10.1023/A:1005310109968
10.1002/jame.20016
10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00599.1
10.1175/1520-0469(1975)032<0003:TEODTC>2.0.CO;2
10.1175/1520-0493(1976)104<0817:ACSCOT>2.0.CO;2
10.1175/1520-0477(1992)073<1962:ATAMIP>2.0.CO;2
10.1002/qj.1923
10.4236/ajcc.2013.23017
10.1007/s10546-010-9478-z
10.1175/1520-0493(1984)112<0909:APIOTS>2.0.CO;2
10.1073/pnas.1906691116
10.1007/s10584-015-1435-x
10.1029/2012GL052759
10.1175/1520-0485(1980)010<1887:AGCEWA>2.0.CO;2
10.1029/2019MS001621
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.02.041
10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00613.1
10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00437.1
10.1002/grl.50256
10.1175/2009JCLI3361.1
10.1007/s00376-014-4053-z
10.1002/2015GL064291
10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016
10.1007/s00376-012-2187-4
10.1515/9780691233857
10.1007/978-3-319-70766-2_41
10.1175/BAMS-88-9-1383
10.1002/2016GL072012
10.1029/97EO00276
10.3402/tellusa.v66.22617
10.1098/rsta.2007.2076
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Attribution
Copyright_xml – notice: 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
– notice: 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
– notice: Attribution
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
7ST
7TG
7U6
C1K
KL.
1XC
VOOES
DOI 10.1002/wcc.648
DatabaseName CrossRef
Environment Abstracts
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts
Sustainability Science Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic
Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)
Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts
Environment Abstracts
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic
Sustainability Science Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
DatabaseTitleList
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts
CrossRef

DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Meteorology & Climatology
EISSN 1757-7799
EndPage n/a
ExternalDocumentID oai:HAL:hal-02878751v1
10_1002_wcc_648
WCC648
Genre reviewArticle
GroupedDBID 05W
0R~
1OC
1VH
31~
33P
4.4
5DZ
8-0
8-1
AAESR
AAHBH
AAHQN
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCUV
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACPOU
ACRPL
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADEOM
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEIGN
AEUYR
AEYWJ
AFBPY
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFWVQ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGYGG
AHBTC
AITYG
AIURR
AJXKR
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMYDB
ASPBG
AUFTA
AVWKF
AZFZN
AZVAB
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMNLL
BMXJE
BRXPI
DCZOG
DRFUL
DRSTM
EBS
ECGQY
EDH
EJD
FEDTE
G-S
GODZA
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZ~
L8X
LATKE
LEEKS
LITHE
LOXES
LUTES
LYRES
MEWTI
MRFUL
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXSTM
MY.
MY~
O66
O9-
P2W
ROL
SUPJJ
WBKPD
WIH
WIK
WOHZO
WUPDE
WXSBR
WYISQ
ZZTAW
AAYXX
BANNL
CITATION
LH4
7ST
7TG
7U6
C1K
KL.
1XC
VOOES
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4228-29f69ee64919a7943b3bcf2e2b85164a692046261f20a7e62e6bedc7e9e3f63e3
IEDL.DBID DRFUL
ISICitedReferencesCount 60
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000527612500001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1757-7780
1757-7799
IngestDate Tue Oct 14 20:52:10 EDT 2025
Sat Jul 26 00:22:56 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 01:53:53 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 21:25:08 EST 2025
Sun Jul 06 04:44:59 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Keywords numerical simulations
epistemology
IPCC
climate models
CMIP
Language English
License Attribution: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4228-29f69ee64919a7943b3bcf2e2b85164a692046261f20a7e62e6bedc7e9e3f63e3
Notes Edited by Eduardo Zorita, Domain Editor, and Mike Hulme, Editor‐in‐Chief
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ORCID 0000-0001-5941-3289
OpenAccessLink https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-02878751
PQID 2411500762
PQPubID 2034595
PageCount 15
ParticipantIDs hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02878751v1
proquest_journals_2411500762
crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_wcc_648
crossref_primary_10_1002_wcc_648
wiley_primary_10_1002_wcc_648_WCC648
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate July/August 2020
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2020
  text: July/August 2020
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Hoboken, USA
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Hoboken, USA
– name: Oxford
PublicationTitle Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Climate change
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Wiley
Publisher_xml – name: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
– name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
– name: Wiley
References 2015; 141
2013; 26
2013; 2
2019; 11
2017; 44
2019; 57
2010; 102
1995; 76
2015; 32
2014; 27
1975
1999; 80
2013; 5
2014; 66
2010; 23
2001
1990
2000
1984; 112
2015; 42
2009; 90
2015; 132
2019; 116
1978; 106
2014; 95
2012; 138
2014; 125
2007; 365
2012
2010
2013; 40
1976; 104
2013; 41
1954
2008
2005; 86
2006
2011; 78
2012; 39
1985; 82
1992
1975; 32
2011; 38
2010; 41
1992; 73
2014; 42
1998; 38
2012; 93
2015; 28
1988; 69
2017; 98
2013; 30
1997; 78
2010; 135
1980; 10
2019
2018
2008; 215
2015
1969; 26
2014
2013
2007; 88
2012; 117
2014; 71
2016; 9
Houghton J. (e_1_2_12_18_1) 1992
e_1_2_12_2_1
e_1_2_12_17_1
e_1_2_12_38_1
Houghton J. (e_1_2_12_4_1) 2001
Pirtle Z. (e_1_2_12_57_1) 2010
e_1_2_12_20_1
e_1_2_12_41_1
e_1_2_12_66_1
e_1_2_12_22_1
e_1_2_12_43_1
e_1_2_12_64_1
e_1_2_12_24_1
e_1_2_12_45_1
e_1_2_12_26_1
e_1_2_12_68_1
e_1_2_12_62_1
e_1_2_12_60_1
e_1_2_12_28_1
e_1_2_12_49_1
e_1_2_12_52_1
e_1_2_12_77_1
Houghton J. (e_1_2_12_14_1) 2001
e_1_2_12_33_1
e_1_2_12_54_1
Pitt J. (e_1_2_12_58_1) 2000
e_1_2_12_35_1
e_1_2_12_56_1
e_1_2_12_37_1
e_1_2_12_12_1
e_1_2_12_8_1
e_1_2_12_10_1
e_1_2_12_73_1
e_1_2_12_50_1
e_1_2_12_71_1
e_1_2_12_3_1
e_1_2_12_5_1
Houghton J. (e_1_2_12_19_1) 1990
Meehl G. A. (e_1_2_12_42_1) 1995; 76
e_1_2_12_16_1
Knutti R. (e_1_2_12_31_1) 2017; 44
e_1_2_12_39_1
Nakicenovic N. (e_1_2_12_46_1) 2000
National Academy of Sciences (e_1_2_12_47_1) 1975
Winsberg E. (e_1_2_12_75_1) 2018
e_1_2_12_65_1
e_1_2_12_21_1
e_1_2_12_44_1
e_1_2_12_63_1
e_1_2_12_23_1
e_1_2_12_69_1
e_1_2_12_25_1
e_1_2_12_48_1
e_1_2_12_67_1
e_1_2_12_61_1
e_1_2_12_27_1
e_1_2_12_29_1
Houghton J. (e_1_2_12_40_1) 2001
e_1_2_12_30_1
e_1_2_12_53_1
e_1_2_12_76_1
e_1_2_12_32_1
e_1_2_12_55_1
e_1_2_12_74_1
Edwards P. N. (e_1_2_12_6_1) 2010
e_1_2_12_34_1
e_1_2_12_36_1
e_1_2_12_59_1
e_1_2_12_15_1
e_1_2_12_13_1
e_1_2_12_11_1
e_1_2_12_72_1
e_1_2_12_7_1
e_1_2_12_51_1
e_1_2_12_70_1
e_1_2_12_9_1
References_xml – volume: 42
  start-page: 69
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  end-page: 81
  article-title: On the persistent spread in snow‐albedo feedback
  publication-title: Climate Dynamics
– start-page: 981
  year: 2019
  end-page: 1004
– volume: 40
  start-page: 1194
  issue: 6
  year: 2013
  end-page: 1199
  article-title: Climate model genealogy: Generation CMIP5 and how we got there
  publication-title: Geophysical Research Letters
– volume: 26
  start-page: 7708
  issue: 19
  year: 2013
  end-page: 7719
  article-title: Decadal prediction of the Sahelian precipitation in CMIP5 simulations
  publication-title: Journal of Climate
– volume: 41
  start-page: 253
  issue: 3
  year: 2010
  end-page: 262
  article-title: Holism, entrenchment, and the future of climate model pluralism
  publication-title: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics
– year: 2001
– start-page: 196
  year: 1975
  end-page: 239
  article-title: Survey of the climate simulation capability of global circulation models
  publication-title: Understanding Climatic Change
– volume: 78
  start-page: 579
  issue: 4
  year: 2011
  end-page: 600
  article-title: When climate models agree: The significance of robust model predictions
  publication-title: Philosophy of Science
– volume: 80
  start-page: 29
  issue: 1
  year: 1999
  end-page: 56
  article-title: An overview of the results of the atmospheric model intercomparison project (AMIP I)
  publication-title: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
– volume: 26
  start-page: 786
  year: 1969
  end-page: 789
  article-title: Climate calculations with a combined ocean‐atmosphere model
  publication-title: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
– volume: 95
  start-page: 243
  issue: 2
  year: 2014
  end-page: 267
  article-title: Decadal climate prediction: An update from the trenches
  publication-title: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
– volume: 44
  start-page: 1909
  issue: 4
  year: 2017
  end-page: 1918
  article-title: A climate model projection weighting scheme accounting for performance and interdependence
  publication-title: Geophysical Research Letters
– volume: 112
  start-page: 909
  issue: 5
  year: 1984
  end-page: 917
  article-title: A preliminary intercomparison of the seasonal response of two atmospheric climate models
  publication-title: Monthly Weather Review
– volume: 9
  start-page: 1937
  issue: 5
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1958
  article-title: Overview of the coupled model intercomparison project phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization
  publication-title: Geoscientific Model Development
– year: 1990
– volume: 42
  start-page: 3513
  issue: 9
  year: 2015
  end-page: 3520
  article-title: Robust signals of future projections of indian summer monsoon rainfall by IPCC AR5 climate models: Role of seasonal cycle and interannual variability
  publication-title: Geophysical Research Letters
– volume: 76
  issue: 6
  year: 1995
  article-title: Global coupled general circulation models
  publication-title: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society meeting summary
– year: 2014
– volume: 39
  year: 2012
  article-title: Significant changes to ENSO strength and impacts in the twenty‐first century: Results from CMIP5
  publication-title: Geophysical Research Letters
– volume: 73
  start-page: 1962
  issue: 12
  year: 1992
  end-page: 1970
  article-title: An AMS continuing series: Global change–AMIP: The atmospheric model intercomparison project
  publication-title: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
– volume: 5
  start-page: 225
  issue: 2
  year: 2013
  end-page: 233
  article-title: Paths to accuracy for radiation parameterizations in atmospheric models
  publication-title: Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
– volume: 78
  start-page: 445
  issue: 41
  year: 1997
  end-page: 451
  article-title: Intercomparison makes for a better climate model
  publication-title: Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union
– volume: 82
  start-page: 335
  issue: 7
  year: 1985
  end-page: 349
  article-title: Epistemic dependence
  publication-title: Journal of Philosophy
– volume: 141
  start-page: 580
  issue: 687
  year: 2015
  end-page: 597
  article-title: Prospects for decadal climate prediction in the Mediterranean region
  publication-title: Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1887
  issue: 12
  year: 1980
  end-page: 1908
  article-title: A general circulation experiment with a coupled atmosphere, ocean and sea ice model
  publication-title: Journal of Physical Oceanography
– volume: 5
  start-page: 173
  issue: 2
  year: 2013
  end-page: 194
  article-title: Arctic Sea‐ice evolution as modeled by max Planck Institute for Meteorology's earth system model
  publication-title: Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
– volume: 32
  start-page: 794
  year: 2015
  end-page: 806
  article-title: Asian summer monsoon onset in simulations and CMIP5 projections using four Chinese climate models
  publication-title: Advances in Atmospheric Sciences
– year: 2018
  article-title: Philosophy and climate science
  publication-title: Cambridge University Press
– year: 2008
– volume: 42
  start-page: 5485
  issue: 13
  year: 2015
  end-page: 5492
  article-title: Radiative flux and forcing parameterization error in aerosol‐free clear skies
  publication-title: Geophysical Research Letters
– volume: 69
  start-page: 40
  issue: 1
  year: 1988
  end-page: 48
  article-title: Intercomparison of radiation codes in climate models (ICRCCM): Longwave clear‐sky results—A workshop summary
  publication-title: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
– volume: 98
  start-page: 589
  issue: 3
  year: 2017
  end-page: 602
  article-title: The art and science of climate model tuning
  publication-title: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
– volume: 40
  start-page: 2193
  issue: 9
  year: 2013
  end-page: 2222
  article-title: LMDZ5B: The atmospheric component of the IPSL climate model with revisited parameterizations for clouds and convection
  publication-title: Climate Dynamics
– start-page: 391
  year: 2013
  end-page: 414
– volume: 11
  start-page: 3074
  issue: 10
  year: 2019
  end-page: 3089
  article-title: Balancing accuracy, efficiency, and flexibility in radiation calculations for dynamical models
  publication-title: Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
– volume: 27
  start-page: 7849
  issue: 20
  year: 2014
  end-page: 7860
  article-title: Robust forced response in south Asian summer monsoon in a future climate
  publication-title: Journal of Climate
– volume: 102
  start-page: 395
  issue: 3
  year: 2010
  end-page: 404
  article-title: The end of model democracy?
  publication-title: Climatic Change
– year: 2015
– volume: 138
  start-page: 841
  issue: 665
  year: 2012
  end-page: 861
  article-title: Towards the probabilistic earth‐system simulator: A vision for the future of climate and weather prediction
  publication-title: Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
– volume: 365
  start-page: 2053
  issue: 1857
  year: 2007
  end-page: 2075
  article-title: The use of the multi‐model ensemble in probabilistic climate projections
  publication-title: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
– volume: 90
  start-page: 175
  issue: 2
  year: 2009
  end-page: 178
  article-title: Strategies: Revolution in climate prediction is both necessary and possible: A declaration at the world modelling summit for climate prediction
  publication-title: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
– volume: 90
  start-page: 1819
  issue: 12
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1832
  article-title: A unified modeling approach to climate system prediction
  publication-title: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
– volume: 116
  start-page: 24,390
  issue: 49
  year: 2019
  end-page: 24,395
  article-title: The scientific challenge of understanding and estimating climate change
  publication-title: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
– volume: 66
  start-page: 22,617
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  article-title: Multimodel estimates of the changes in the Baltic Sea ice cover during the present century
  publication-title: Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography
– volume: 88
  start-page: 1383
  issue: 9
  year: 2007
  end-page: 1394
  article-title: The WCRP CMIP3 multimodel dataset: A new era in climate change research
  publication-title: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
– year: 2000
– volume: 27
  start-page: 2861
  issue: 8
  year: 2014
  end-page: 2885
  article-title: Cold tongue and warm pool ENSO events in CMIP5: Mean state and future projections
  publication-title: Journal of Climate
– volume: 41
  start-page: 2471
  issue: 9
  year: 2013
  end-page: 2479
  article-title: Quantifying global climate feedbacks, responses and forcing under abrupt and gradual CO2 forcing
  publication-title: Climate Dynamics
– volume: 132
  start-page: 475
  issue: 4
  year: 2015
  end-page: 487
  article-title: The future of climate modeling
  publication-title: Climatic Change
– year: 1954
– volume: 106
  start-page: 1245
  issue: 9
  year: 1978
  end-page: 1279
  article-title: Forecast intercomparisons from three numerical weather prediction models
  publication-title: Monthly Weather Review
– year: 1992
– volume: 57
  start-page: 250
  issue: 2
  year: 2019
  end-page: 280
  article-title: Model hierarchies for understanding atmospheric circulation
  publication-title: Reviews of Geophysics
– year: 2010
– year: 2012
– volume: 215
  start-page: 3
  issue: 1
  year: 2008
  end-page: 9
  article-title: Overview of the model types available for development of ecological models
  publication-title: Ecological Modelling
– volume: 30
  start-page: 790
  issue: 3
  year: 2013
  end-page: 795
  article-title: Poleward expansion of the Hadley circulation in CMIP5 simulations
  publication-title: Advances in Atmospheric Sciences
– volume: 38
  year: 2011
  article-title: Climate model genealogy
  publication-title: Geophysical Research Letters
– volume: 71
  start-page: 496
  issue: 2
  year: 2014
  end-page: 514
  article-title: Deep convection triggering by boundary layer thermals. Part I: Les analysis and stochastic triggering formulation
  publication-title: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
– volume: 135
  start-page: 469
  issue: 3
  year: 2010
  end-page: 483
  article-title: Resolved versus parametrized boundary‐layer plumes. Part II: Continuous formulations of mixing rates for mass‐flux schemes
  publication-title: Boundary‐Layer Meteorology
– volume: 365
  start-page: 2163
  issue: 1857
  year: 2007
  end-page: 2177
  article-title: Issues in the interpretation of climate model ensembles to inform decisions
  publication-title: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
– volume: 86
  start-page: 89
  year: 2005
  end-page: 93
  article-title: Overview of the coupled model intercomparison project
  publication-title: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
– year: 2006
– volume: 104
  start-page: 817
  issue: 7
  year: 1976
  end-page: 827
  article-title: A case study comparison of the performance of operational prediction models used in the United States
  publication-title: Monthly Weather Review
– volume: 28
  start-page: 4390
  issue: 11
  year: 2015
  end-page: 4413
  article-title: Understanding uncertainties in future projections of seasonal tropical precipitation
  publication-title: Journal of Climate
– volume: 117
  start-page: 1
  issue: D6
  year: 2012
  end-page: 19
  article-title: The continual intercomparison of radiation codes: Results from phase I
  publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
– volume: 38
  start-page: 159
  year: 1998
  end-page: 205
  article-title: Uncertainty, complexity and concepts of good science in climate change modelling: Are GCMs the best tools?
  publication-title: Climatic Change
– volume: 23
  start-page: 2739
  issue: 10
  year: 2010
  end-page: 2758
  article-title: Challenges in combining projections from multiple climate models
  publication-title: Journal of Climate
– volume: 2
  start-page: 173
  year: 2013
  end-page: 182
  article-title: Future changes in drought characteristics over southern South America projected by a CMIP5 multi‐model ensemble
  publication-title: American Journal of Climate Change
– volume: 32
  start-page: 3
  issue: 1
  year: 1975
  end-page: 15
  article-title: The effects of doubling the CO2 concentration on the climate of a general circulation model
  publication-title: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
– volume: 125
  start-page: 445
  issue: 3
  year: 2014
  end-page: 460
  article-title: Projected climate change impacts on spatial distribution of bioclimatic zones and ecoregions within the Kailash sacred landscape of China, India, Nepal
  publication-title: Climatic Change
– volume: 93
  start-page: 485
  issue: 4
  year: 2012
  end-page: 498
  article-title: An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design
  publication-title: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
– ident: e_1_2_12_2_1
  doi: 10.1175/1520-0493(1978)106<1245:FIFTNW>2.0.CO;2
– volume-title: Emissions scenarios–Special report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change
  year: 2000
  ident: e_1_2_12_46_1
– ident: e_1_2_12_10_1
  doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00635.1
– ident: e_1_2_12_49_1
  doi: 10.1029/2011JD016821
– ident: e_1_2_12_21_1
  doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00135.1
– volume-title: Climate change 2001: The scientific basis
  year: 2001
  ident: e_1_2_12_14_1
– ident: e_1_2_12_64_1
  doi: 10.1175/2008BAMS2759.1
– ident: e_1_2_12_32_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2010.07.001
– ident: e_1_2_12_36_1
  doi: 10.1029/2018RG000607
– ident: e_1_2_12_76_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10584-014-1176-2
– ident: e_1_2_12_15_1
  doi: 10.1002/qj.2379
– ident: e_1_2_12_16_1
  doi: 10.2307/2026523
– ident: e_1_2_12_74_1
– ident: e_1_2_12_56_1
  doi: 10.1002/jame.20027
– ident: e_1_2_12_20_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00382-012-1343-y
– ident: e_1_2_12_35_1
  doi: 10.1175/1520-0477-69.1.40
– ident: e_1_2_12_60_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00382-013-1774-0
– volume-title: Climate change 1992: The supplementary report to the IPCC scientific assessment
  year: 1992
  ident: e_1_2_12_18_1
– ident: e_1_2_12_39_1
  doi: 10.1029/2011GL046864
– ident: e_1_2_12_12_1
– ident: e_1_2_12_9_1
  doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195328318.003.0012
– ident: e_1_2_12_24_1
  doi: 10.1002/2015GL063659
– ident: e_1_2_12_66_1
  doi: 10.1098/rsta.2007.2073
– ident: e_1_2_12_69_1
  doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1
– ident: e_1_2_12_37_1
  doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1969)026<0786:CCWACO>2.0.CO;2
– volume-title: What does it mean when climate models agree?
  year: 2010
  ident: e_1_2_12_57_1
– ident: e_1_2_12_13_1
  doi: 10.1175/1520-0477(1999)080<0029:AOOTRO>2.0.CO;2
– ident: e_1_2_12_52_1
  doi: 10.1086/661566
– ident: e_1_2_12_33_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00382-013-1677-0
– ident: e_1_2_12_3_1
  doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-6692-1_14
– ident: e_1_2_12_23_1
  doi: 10.1175/2009BAMS2752.1
– volume-title: A vast machine: Computer models, climate data, and the politics of global warming
  year: 2010
  ident: e_1_2_12_6_1
– ident: e_1_2_12_72_1
– ident: e_1_2_12_28_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10584-010-9800-2
– ident: e_1_2_12_62_1
  doi: 10.1175/JAS-D-12-0336.1
– ident: e_1_2_12_41_1
  doi: 10.1175/BAMS-86-1-89
– ident: e_1_2_12_45_1
  doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00241.1
– ident: e_1_2_12_63_1
  doi: 10.1023/A:1005310109968
– volume: 76
  issue: 6
  year: 1995
  ident: e_1_2_12_42_1
  article-title: Global coupled general circulation models
  publication-title: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society meeting summary
– ident: e_1_2_12_48_1
  doi: 10.1002/jame.20016
– volume-title: Thinking about technology: Foundations of the philosophy of technology
  year: 2000
  ident: e_1_2_12_58_1
– ident: e_1_2_12_65_1
  doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00599.1
– ident: e_1_2_12_38_1
  doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1975)032<0003:TEODTC>2.0.CO;2
– ident: e_1_2_12_17_1
  doi: 10.1175/1520-0493(1976)104<0817:ACSCOT>2.0.CO;2
– ident: e_1_2_12_11_1
  doi: 10.1175/1520-0477(1992)073<1962:ATAMIP>2.0.CO;2
– ident: e_1_2_12_51_1
  doi: 10.1002/qj.1923
– ident: e_1_2_12_53_1
  doi: 10.4236/ajcc.2013.23017
– volume-title: IPCC first assessment report 1990
  year: 1990
  ident: e_1_2_12_19_1
– ident: e_1_2_12_61_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10546-010-9478-z
– ident: e_1_2_12_59_1
  doi: 10.1175/1520-0493(1984)112<0909:APIOTS>2.0.CO;2
– ident: e_1_2_12_50_1
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.1906691116
– volume-title: Climate change 2001: The scientific basis
  year: 2001
  ident: e_1_2_12_4_1
– year: 2018
  ident: e_1_2_12_75_1
  article-title: Philosophy and climate science
  publication-title: Cambridge University Press
– ident: e_1_2_12_26_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10584-015-1435-x
– ident: e_1_2_12_67_1
  doi: 10.1029/2012GL052759
– ident: e_1_2_12_73_1
– ident: e_1_2_12_71_1
  doi: 10.1175/1520-0485(1980)010<1887:AGCEWA>2.0.CO;2
– start-page: 196
  year: 1975
  ident: e_1_2_12_47_1
  article-title: Survey of the climate simulation capability of global circulation models
  publication-title: Understanding Climatic Change
– ident: e_1_2_12_54_1
  doi: 10.1029/2019MS001621
– ident: e_1_2_12_25_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.02.041
– ident: e_1_2_12_27_1
  doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00613.1
– ident: e_1_2_12_68_1
  doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00437.1
– ident: e_1_2_12_30_1
  doi: 10.1002/grl.50256
– ident: e_1_2_12_29_1
  doi: 10.1175/2009JCLI3361.1
– ident: e_1_2_12_77_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00376-014-4053-z
– ident: e_1_2_12_55_1
  doi: 10.1002/2015GL064291
– ident: e_1_2_12_7_1
  doi: 10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016
– ident: e_1_2_12_22_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00376-012-2187-4
– volume-title: Climate change 2001: The scientific basis
  year: 2001
  ident: e_1_2_12_40_1
– ident: e_1_2_12_5_1
  doi: 10.1515/9780691233857
– ident: e_1_2_12_8_1
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-70766-2_41
– ident: e_1_2_12_44_1
  doi: 10.1175/BAMS-88-9-1383
– volume: 44
  start-page: 1909
  issue: 4
  year: 2017
  ident: e_1_2_12_31_1
  article-title: A climate model projection weighting scheme accounting for performance and interdependence
  publication-title: Geophysical Research Letters
  doi: 10.1002/2016GL072012
– ident: e_1_2_12_43_1
  doi: 10.1029/97EO00276
– ident: e_1_2_12_34_1
  doi: 10.3402/tellusa.v66.22617
– ident: e_1_2_12_70_1
  doi: 10.1098/rsta.2007.2076
SSID ssj0000328884
Score 2.4737933
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet The results of the sixth phase of the coupled model intercomparison project (CMIP) are currently being analyzed and will form the basis of the IPCC Sixth...
The results of the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) are currently being analysed and will form the basis of the IPCC Sixth...
SourceID hal
proquest
crossref
wiley
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage e648
SubjectTerms Climate effects
Climate models
Climate science
Climate studies
CMIP
Earth Sciences
epistemology
Evolution
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
IPCC
Meteorology
numerical simulations
Sciences of the Universe
Visibility
Title The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project: History, uses, and structural effects on climate research
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fwcc.648
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2411500762
https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-02878751
Volume 11
WOSCitedRecordID wos000527612500001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Online Library Full Collection 2020
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1757-7799
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0000328884
  issn: 1757-7780
  databaseCode: DRFUL
  dateStart: 20100101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8QwEB509eDFt1hfBBFPW92mbZp4k-qyh1VEfOyttOkUhWVXrA_8907Sbl0RQfBU2s6QkpnJfB2SbwAOQk9oHgnhZlEncwOda1cKFK7OCylDSQnBli7u-tHlpRwM1NVUq6-KH6IpuJnIsOu1CfA0K4-_SEPftT4SgZyFOU5eG7Rg7uy6e9tvCiyGKE7ajsOUISNCkbJTHZo1-se19rdsNPtg9kJOAc1puGrzTXfpH1-6DIs1yGSnlVeswAyOVsG5IHw8frZldHbI4uEjgVV7twY5eQuLx69PQ8yZaY82ZLZUqJsuheyqKtmcsIpY5KPNXkss2ywd5awioTUEHqzeH8JIQ9sRkNV8Qg_rcNs9v4l7bt1_wdWGGMzlqhAKUQTKU6khksv8TBcceUYwTQSpUNwcbRVewTtphIKjyDDXESr0C-GjvwGt0XiEm8AUQQOuQumnlA5lwNMUZRCSoCykyrV04HBih0TX5OSmR8YwqWiVeUKTmNAkOsAawaeKj-OnyD4Zsnlr-LN7p_3EPCMwRQtU6L15DuxM7JzUUVsmhGYIH3coPzhwYC362xjJfRzTZetvYtuwwM1vut3luwMtMgruwrx-e3ksn_dqx_0EL0vxEg
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1RS9xAEB7qKdSXttqKabVdRHwy3mWTbHb7JmmPE-MhRatvS7KZoHDcHXdq6b_v7GaNllIo9CkkmWXDzuzOl2HmG4D9NBKGZ0KEVTaowsTUJpQCRWjqRspUkkNwoYvvRTYey-trde6zKm0tTMsP0QXc7M5w57Xd4DYg3X9iDf1hzJFI5AqsJmREaQ9Wv3wbXhZdhMUyxUnXcphcZEYwUg7aqlk7vu9H_-aOVm5sMuQzpPkcrzqHM3z9P5_6Bl55mMmOW7vYgBc43YTgjBDybOEC6eyA5ZNbgqvu7i3UZC8sn93PJ1gz2yBtwlyw0HR9Ctl5G7T5zFpqkZ-H7H6Jy0NWTmvW0tBaCg_mM0QYjTBuBmSeUejmHVwOv17ko9B3YAiNpQYLuWqEQhSJilRpqeSquDINR14RUBNJKRS3xa0iavigzFBwFBXWJkOFcSNijLegN51NcRuYInDAVSrjkhyiTHhZokxSEpSNVLWRARw8KkIbT09uu2RMdEuszDUtoqZFDIB1gvOWkeNPkT3SZPfWMmiPjgttnxGcoiMqjR6iAHYeFa39vl1qwjOEkAfkIQLYdyr92xz6Ks_p8v7fxD7By9HFWaGLk_HpB1jn9qfd5fzuQI8UhLuwZh7ubpeLj96KfwGb4fUC
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3dS9xAEB_8Qnyx1g-MtboU8cn0Lptks9s3iR5Kr8dR1Pq2JJsJCsfd4flB__vObtbUUgTBp5Bklg07Ozu_DDO_AThII2F4JkRYZt0yTExlQilQhKaqpUwlOQQXurjqZ4OBvL5WQ59VaWthGn6INuBmLcOd19bAcVrVnb-soU_GfBWJnIfFJFWCjHLx5Gfvst9GWCxTnHQth8lFZgQjZbepmrXjO370P-5o_sYmQ75Ami_xqnM4vQ_v-dQ1WPUwkx03--IjzOF4HYIfhJAndy6Qzg5ZProluOruNqCi_cLyycN0hBWzDdJGzAULTdunkA2boM031lCL_D5iDzOcHbFiXLGGhtZSeDCfIcJohHEzIPOMQjebcNk7vcjPQt-BITSWGizkqhYKUSQqUoWlkivj0tQceUlATSSFUNwWt4qo5t0iQ8FRlFiZDBXGtYgx3oKF8WSM28AUgQOuUhkX5BBlwosCZZKSoKylqowM4PBZEdp4enLbJWOkG2JlrmkRNS1iAKwVnDaMHP-LfCFNtm8tg_bZcV_bZwSn6IhKo8cogN1nRWtvtzNNeIYQcpc8RAAHTqWvzaF_5Tlddt4mtg_Lw5Oe7p8Pvn-CFW7_2V3K7y4skH7wMyyZx_vb2d2e38R_ADem9H0
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Coupled+Model+Intercomparison+Project%3A+History%2C+uses%2C+and+structural+effects+on+climate+research&rft.jtitle=Wiley+interdisciplinary+reviews.+Climate+change&rft.au=Touz%C3%A9%E2%80%90Peiffer%2C+Ludovic&rft.au=Barberousse%2C+Anouk&rft.au=Le+Treut%2C+Herv%C3%A9&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.issn=1757-7780&rft.eissn=1757-7799&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fwcc.648&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1002_wcc_648
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1757-7780&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1757-7780&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1757-7780&client=summon