An evaluation of tropical waves and wave forcing of the QBO in the QBOi models

We analyze the stratospheric waves in models participating in phase 1 of the Stratosphere–troposphere Processes And their Role in Climate (SPARC) Quasi‐Biennial Oscillation initiative (QBOi). All models have robust Kelvin and mixed Rossby‐gravity wave modes in winds and temperatures at 50 hPa and re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society Vol. 148; no. 744; pp. 1541 - 1567
Main Authors: Holt, Laura A., Lott, François, Garcia, Rolando R., Kiladis, George N., Cheng, Yuan‐Ming, Anstey, James A., Braesicke, Peter, Bushell, Andrew C., Butchart, Neal, Cagnazzo, Chiara, Chen, Chih‐Chieh, Chun, Hye‐Yeong, Kawatani, Yoshio, Kerzenmacher, Tobias, Kim, Young‐Ha, McLandress, Charles, Naoe, Hiroaki, Osprey, Scott, Richter, Jadwiga H., Scaife, Adam A., Scinocca, John, Serva, Federico, Versick, Stefan, Watanabe, Shingo, Yoshida, Kohei, Yukimoto, Seiji
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.04.2022
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Wiley
Subjects:
ISSN:0035-9009, 1477-870X
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We analyze the stratospheric waves in models participating in phase 1 of the Stratosphere–troposphere Processes And their Role in Climate (SPARC) Quasi‐Biennial Oscillation initiative (QBOi). All models have robust Kelvin and mixed Rossby‐gravity wave modes in winds and temperatures at 50 hPa and represent them better than most of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) models. There is still some spread among the models, especially concerning the mixed Rossby‐gravity waves. We attribute the variability in equatorial waves among the QBOi models in part to the varying horizontal and vertical resolutions, to systematic biases in zonal winds, and to the considerable variability in convectively coupled waves in the troposphere among the models: only roughly half of the QBOi models have realistic convectively coupled Kelvin waves and only a few models have convectively coupled mixed Rossby‐gravity waves. The models with stronger convectively coupled waves tend to produce larger zonal mean forcing due to resolved waves in the QBO region. Finally we evaluate the Eliassen–Palm (EP) flux and EP flux divergence of the resolved waves in the QBOi models. We find that there is a large spread in the forcing from resolved waves in the QBO region, and the resolved wave forcing has a robust correlation with model vertical resolution. The QBOi models vary widely in their ability to simulate equatorial waves and in the magnitude of resolved wave‐forcing contributing to the driving of the model QBO. In the QBOi models, despite the varying set‐ups, vertical resolution emerged as a clear factor controlling the degree of wave forcing in the eastward QBO shear zones. This figure shows how the wave forcing due to resolved large‐scale eastward propagating waves relates to model vertical and horizontal resolution.
Bibliography:Funding information
ANR/JPI‐Climate/Belmont Forum, GOTHAM(ANR‐15‐JCLI‐0004‐01); Baden‐Württemberg Stiftung, bwHPC; Copernicus Climate Change Service, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Japan Agency for Marine‐Earth Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, JP15KK0178; JP17K18816; JP18H01286; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 80NSSC17K0169; 80NSSC18K0069; NNX14O76G; National Center for Atmospheric Research, NSF Cooperative Agreement No. 1852977
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0035-9009
1477-870X
DOI:10.1002/qj.3827