Computational Limits on Team Identification of Languages
A team of learning machines is a multiset of learning machines. A team is said to successfully identify a concept just in case each member of some nonempty subset, of predetermined size, of the team identifies the concept. Team identification of programs for computable functions from their graphs ha...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Information and computation Vol. 130; no. 1; pp. 19 - 60 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
San Diego, CA
Elsevier Inc
10.10.1996
Elsevier |
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 0890-5401, 1090-2651 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | A team of learning machines is a multiset of learning machines. A team is said to successfully identify a concept just in case each member of some nonempty subset, of predetermined size, of the team identifies the concept. Team identification of programs for computable functions from their graphs has been investigated by Smith. Pitt showed that this notion is essentially equivalent to function identification by a single probabilistic machine. The present paper introduces, motivates, and studies the more difficult subject of team identification of grammars for languages from positive data. It is shown that an analog of Pitt's result about equivalence of team function identification and probabilistic function identification does not hold for language identification, and the results in the present paper reveal a very complex structure for team language identification. It is also shown that for certain cases probabilistic language identification is strictly more powerful than team language identification. Proofs of many results in the present paper involve very sophisticated diagonalization arguments. Two very general tools are presented that yield proofs of new results from simple arithmetic manipulation of the parameters of known ones. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0890-5401 1090-2651 |
| DOI: | 10.1006/inco.1996.0081 |