A Systematic Comparison of In-Person and Video-Based Online Interviewing

Due to the increasing popularity of online qualitative interviewing methods, we provide a systematically organized evaluation of their advantages and disadvantages in comparison to traditional in-person interviews. In particular, we describe how individual interviews, dyadic interviews, and focus gr...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:International journal of qualitative methods Ročník 21
Hlavní autoři: Lobe, Bojana, Morgan, David L., Hoffman, Kim
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.09.2022
Sage Publications Ltd
SAGE Publishing
Témata:
Ethics
Internet
Interviews
Logistics
Popularity
Recruitment
Research design
Research ethics
Video conferencing
online data collection
individual interviewing
video conferencing
focus groups
dyadic interviewing
ISSN:1609-4069, 1609-4069
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Due to the increasing popularity of online qualitative interviewing methods, we provide a systematically organized evaluation of their advantages and disadvantages in comparison to traditional in-person interviews. In particular, we describe how individual interviews, dyadic interviews, and focus groups operate in both face-to-face and videoconferencing modes. This produces five different areas for comparison: logistics and budget, ethics, recruitment, research design, and interviewing and moderating. We conclude each section with set of recommendations, and conclude with directions for future research in online interviewing.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1609-4069
1609-4069
DOI:10.1177/16094069221127068