Prospective, Randomized Controlled Pivotal Trial of Biodegradable Balloon Rectal Spacer for Prostate Radiation Therapy

Rectal spacers have been shown to reduce rectal side effects in patients receiving prostate radiation. However, concerns remain regarding precise and reproducible gel injection. We evaluated efficacy and safety of a novel rectoprostatic spacer balloon that allows potential for controlled, adaptable...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics Ročník 120; číslo 5; s. 1410
Hlavní autori: Song, Daniel, Dabkowski, Mateusz, Costa, Paulo, Nurani, Rizwan, Kos, Michael, Vanneste, Ben, Magel, David, Sapir, Eli, Zimberg, Shawn, Boychak, Oleksandr, Soffen, Edward, Alhasso, Abdulla, Tokita, Kenneth, Wang, Dian, Symon, Zvi, Hudes, Richard
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: United States 01.12.2024
Predmet:
ISSN:1879-355X, 1879-355X
On-line prístup:Zistit podrobnosti o prístupe
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Abstract Rectal spacers have been shown to reduce rectal side effects in patients receiving prostate radiation. However, concerns remain regarding precise and reproducible gel injection. We evaluated efficacy and safety of a novel rectoprostatic spacer balloon that allows potential for controlled, adaptable deployment. This study tested co-primary hypotheses: (1) balloon spacer would result in ≥25% reduction of rectal V70 in >75% of subjects and (2) implantation procedure-related and rectal ≥grade 1 adverse events within 6 months (duration ≥2 days, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0) would be noninferior in balloon versus control subjects. A total of 222 subjects were enrolled at 16 centers. All patients had T1-T3 prostate cancer without magnetic resonance imaging evidence of posterior extraprostatic invasion. Randomization was 2:1 (balloon: control) and subject-blinded. Patients underwent transperineal transrectal ultrasound axial and sagittal-guided fiducial placement ± balloon, followed by Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (81 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions or biologically equivalent hypofractionated dose). For efficacy comparisons, plans were generated by a central core lab on pre- and postimplant computed tomography scans. The primary efficacy endpoint was met, with 97.9% of balloon subjects (139/142) having rectal V70 reduction >25% (P < .001). Mean V70 was 7.0 % pre- versus 1.1% postimplant. The primary safety endpoint was met with balloon subjects experiencing fewer ≥grade 1 events, 18% versus 23% (P < .001 for noninferiority). On predefined secondary endpoint of ≥grade 2 events, rates trended lower in balloon subjects (4.3% vs 6.5%, P = .527). Mean perirectal spacing was 19 ± 3.7 mm and maintained through radiation treatment (18 ± 3.9 mm). Balloon resorption was observed on 6-month computed tomography in 98.5% (133/135) of subjects. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index quality of life instrument was collected throughout study, and did not differ statistically between the study arms. Biodegradable rectal spacer balloon was effective in significantly reducing dose to rectum, and associated with decreased cumulative rectal plus implantation-related adverse events. Balloon resorption was consistently observed by 6 months.
AbstractList Rectal spacers have been shown to reduce rectal side effects in patients receiving prostate radiation. However, concerns remain regarding precise and reproducible gel injection. We evaluated efficacy and safety of a novel rectoprostatic spacer balloon that allows potential for controlled, adaptable deployment. This study tested co-primary hypotheses: (1) balloon spacer would result in ≥25% reduction of rectal V70 in >75% of subjects and (2) implantation procedure-related and rectal ≥grade 1 adverse events within 6 months (duration ≥2 days, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0) would be noninferior in balloon versus control subjects.PURPOSE/OBJECTIVESRectal spacers have been shown to reduce rectal side effects in patients receiving prostate radiation. However, concerns remain regarding precise and reproducible gel injection. We evaluated efficacy and safety of a novel rectoprostatic spacer balloon that allows potential for controlled, adaptable deployment. This study tested co-primary hypotheses: (1) balloon spacer would result in ≥25% reduction of rectal V70 in >75% of subjects and (2) implantation procedure-related and rectal ≥grade 1 adverse events within 6 months (duration ≥2 days, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0) would be noninferior in balloon versus control subjects.A total of 222 subjects were enrolled at 16 centers. All patients had T1-T3 prostate cancer without magnetic resonance imaging evidence of posterior extraprostatic invasion. Randomization was 2:1 (balloon: control) and subject-blinded. Patients underwent transperineal transrectal ultrasound axial and sagittal-guided fiducial placement ± balloon, followed by Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (81 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions or biologically equivalent hypofractionated dose). For efficacy comparisons, plans were generated by a central core lab on pre- and postimplant computed tomography scans.METHODS AND MATERIALSA total of 222 subjects were enrolled at 16 centers. All patients had T1-T3 prostate cancer without magnetic resonance imaging evidence of posterior extraprostatic invasion. Randomization was 2:1 (balloon: control) and subject-blinded. Patients underwent transperineal transrectal ultrasound axial and sagittal-guided fiducial placement ± balloon, followed by Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (81 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions or biologically equivalent hypofractionated dose). For efficacy comparisons, plans were generated by a central core lab on pre- and postimplant computed tomography scans.The primary efficacy endpoint was met, with 97.9% of balloon subjects (139/142) having rectal V70 reduction >25% (P < .001). Mean V70 was 7.0 % pre- versus 1.1% postimplant. The primary safety endpoint was met with balloon subjects experiencing fewer ≥grade 1 events, 18% versus 23% (P < .001 for noninferiority). On predefined secondary endpoint of ≥grade 2 events, rates trended lower in balloon subjects (4.3% vs 6.5%, P = .527). Mean perirectal spacing was 19 ± 3.7 mm and maintained through radiation treatment (18 ± 3.9 mm). Balloon resorption was observed on 6-month computed tomography in 98.5% (133/135) of subjects. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index quality of life instrument was collected throughout study, and did not differ statistically between the study arms.RESULTSThe primary efficacy endpoint was met, with 97.9% of balloon subjects (139/142) having rectal V70 reduction >25% (P < .001). Mean V70 was 7.0 % pre- versus 1.1% postimplant. The primary safety endpoint was met with balloon subjects experiencing fewer ≥grade 1 events, 18% versus 23% (P < .001 for noninferiority). On predefined secondary endpoint of ≥grade 2 events, rates trended lower in balloon subjects (4.3% vs 6.5%, P = .527). Mean perirectal spacing was 19 ± 3.7 mm and maintained through radiation treatment (18 ± 3.9 mm). Balloon resorption was observed on 6-month computed tomography in 98.5% (133/135) of subjects. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index quality of life instrument was collected throughout study, and did not differ statistically between the study arms.Biodegradable rectal spacer balloon was effective in significantly reducing dose to rectum, and associated with decreased cumulative rectal plus implantation-related adverse events. Balloon resorption was consistently observed by 6 months.CONCLUSIONSBiodegradable rectal spacer balloon was effective in significantly reducing dose to rectum, and associated with decreased cumulative rectal plus implantation-related adverse events. Balloon resorption was consistently observed by 6 months.
Rectal spacers have been shown to reduce rectal side effects in patients receiving prostate radiation. However, concerns remain regarding precise and reproducible gel injection. We evaluated efficacy and safety of a novel rectoprostatic spacer balloon that allows potential for controlled, adaptable deployment. This study tested co-primary hypotheses: (1) balloon spacer would result in ≥25% reduction of rectal V70 in >75% of subjects and (2) implantation procedure-related and rectal ≥grade 1 adverse events within 6 months (duration ≥2 days, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0) would be noninferior in balloon versus control subjects. A total of 222 subjects were enrolled at 16 centers. All patients had T1-T3 prostate cancer without magnetic resonance imaging evidence of posterior extraprostatic invasion. Randomization was 2:1 (balloon: control) and subject-blinded. Patients underwent transperineal transrectal ultrasound axial and sagittal-guided fiducial placement ± balloon, followed by Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (81 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions or biologically equivalent hypofractionated dose). For efficacy comparisons, plans were generated by a central core lab on pre- and postimplant computed tomography scans. The primary efficacy endpoint was met, with 97.9% of balloon subjects (139/142) having rectal V70 reduction >25% (P < .001). Mean V70 was 7.0 % pre- versus 1.1% postimplant. The primary safety endpoint was met with balloon subjects experiencing fewer ≥grade 1 events, 18% versus 23% (P < .001 for noninferiority). On predefined secondary endpoint of ≥grade 2 events, rates trended lower in balloon subjects (4.3% vs 6.5%, P = .527). Mean perirectal spacing was 19 ± 3.7 mm and maintained through radiation treatment (18 ± 3.9 mm). Balloon resorption was observed on 6-month computed tomography in 98.5% (133/135) of subjects. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index quality of life instrument was collected throughout study, and did not differ statistically between the study arms. Biodegradable rectal spacer balloon was effective in significantly reducing dose to rectum, and associated with decreased cumulative rectal plus implantation-related adverse events. Balloon resorption was consistently observed by 6 months.
Author Song, Daniel
Dabkowski, Mateusz
Costa, Paulo
Nurani, Rizwan
Soffen, Edward
Hudes, Richard
Boychak, Oleksandr
Kos, Michael
Sapir, Eli
Tokita, Kenneth
Wang, Dian
Vanneste, Ben
Zimberg, Shawn
Alhasso, Abdulla
Magel, David
Symon, Zvi
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Daniel
  surname: Song
  fullname: Song, Daniel
  email: kerma99@gmail.com
  organization: Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: kerma99@gmail.com
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Mateusz
  surname: Dabkowski
  fullname: Dabkowski, Mateusz
  organization: Department of Brachytherapy, Oncology Center Institute of Maria Skłodowska Curie (MCMCC), Warsaw, Poland
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Paulo
  surname: Costa
  fullname: Costa, Paulo
  organization: CUF Porto Instituto Rua Fonte das Sete Bicas, Senhora da Hora Matosinhos, Portugal
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Rizwan
  surname: Nurani
  fullname: Nurani, Rizwan
  organization: Western Radiation Oncology (WRO), B Campbell, California
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Michael
  surname: Kos
  fullname: Kos, Michael
  organization: Northern Nevada Radiation Oncology, Reno, Nevada
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Ben
  surname: Vanneste
  fullname: Vanneste, Ben
  organization: MAASTRO Clinic Dr. Tanslaan, Maastricht, The Netherlands
– sequence: 7
  givenname: David
  surname: Magel
  fullname: Magel, David
  organization: Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Eli
  surname: Sapir
  fullname: Sapir, Eli
  organization: Ha-Refu'a St 7 Ashdod, Assuta, Israel
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Shawn
  surname: Zimberg
  fullname: Zimberg, Shawn
  organization: Advanced Radiation Centers of New York, Lake Success, New York
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Oleksandr
  surname: Boychak
  fullname: Boychak, Oleksandr
  organization: St Luke's Hospital, Rathgar, Dublin, Ireland
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Edward
  surname: Soffen
  fullname: Soffen, Edward
  organization: Astera Cancer Care, Monroe Township, New Jersey
– sequence: 12
  givenname: Abdulla
  surname: Alhasso
  fullname: Alhasso, Abdulla
  organization: Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, Scotland
– sequence: 13
  givenname: Kenneth
  surname: Tokita
  fullname: Tokita, Kenneth
  organization: KSK Medical Center, Irvine, California
– sequence: 14
  givenname: Dian
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Dian
  organization: Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
– sequence: 15
  givenname: Zvi
  surname: Symon
  fullname: Symon, Zvi
  organization: Shiba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
– sequence: 16
  givenname: Richard
  surname: Hudes
  fullname: Hudes, Richard
  organization: Chesapeake Urology Research, Owings Mills, Maryland
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39032758$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNkEtLw0AUhQep2If-BCVLFybOK6-lLb6gYKkV3IWbzI1OmWbiZFqov94UK7i558D9-BZnTAaNbZCQS0YjRllyu4702tmyjTjlMqJpxJmMT8iIZWkeijh-H_zrQzLuujWllLFUnpGhyKngaZyNyG7hbNdi5fUOb4IlNMpu9DeqYGYb76wxfV3onfVggpXT_bV1MNVW4YcDBaXBYArGWNsEy97S_19bqNAFtXXBwe3BY-9VGrzuodUnOmj35-S0BtPhxTEn5O3hfjV7Cucvj8-zu3lYSZb7ENOKJ5nIBctVWmUyhxJqCbyPrKyFEFTJnGaQ8KSusC7jkicxiqRWnEIuGZ-Q619v6-zXFjtfbHRXoTHQoN12haCZOAwn0x69OqLbcoOqaJ3egNsXf1vxH_P2cXo
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2025_1563015
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brachy_2024_10_003
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers17121970
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_025_05802_2
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2025_1654925
crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_85099
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prro_2025_03_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2024_09_015
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.2145
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1879-355X
ExternalDocumentID 39032758
Genre Randomized Controlled Trial
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
.1-
.FO
0R~
1B1
1P~
1RT
1~5
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5RE
7-5
AAEDT
AAEDW
AALRI
AAWTL
AAXUO
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABNEU
ABOCM
ABUDA
ACGFS
ACIUM
ADBBV
AENEX
AEVXI
AFCTW
AFJKZ
AFRHN
AFTJW
AHHHB
AITUG
AJUYK
AKRWK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
BELOY
CGR
CUY
CVF
DU5
EBS
ECM
EFJIC
EIF
F5P
FDB
GBLVA
HED
HMO
IHE
J1W
KOM
LX3
M41
MO0
NPM
O9-
OC~
OO-
RNS
ROL
RPZ
SDG
SEL
SES
SEW
SSZ
UV1
XH2
Z5R
~S-
7X8
EFKBS
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-e7c26839319d7c849abaf4a2aba8bf3330d4908a626fcefb5b265e36fd20a9412
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISICitedReferencesCount 5
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001376738200001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1879-355X
IngestDate Wed Oct 01 14:25:01 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:02:11 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Language English
License Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c419t-e7c26839319d7c849abaf4a2aba8bf3330d4908a626fcefb5b265e36fd20a9412
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
PMID 39032758
PQID 3083214547
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_3083214547
pubmed_primary_39032758
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-Dec-01
20241201
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-Dec-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
PublicationTitleAlternate Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
PublicationYear 2024
SSID ssj0001174
Score 2.4918528
Snippet Rectal spacers have been shown to reduce rectal side effects in patients receiving prostate radiation. However, concerns remain regarding precise and...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 1410
SubjectTerms Absorbable Implants
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Fiducial Markers
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Radiation Injuries - prevention & control
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - adverse effects
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods
Rectum - diagnostic imaging
Rectum - radiation effects
Title Prospective, Randomized Controlled Pivotal Trial of Biodegradable Balloon Rectal Spacer for Prostate Radiation Therapy
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39032758
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3083214547
Volume 120
WOSCitedRecordID wos001376738200001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8QwEA6-EC--3w8ieDTaTbJNcxIVxYvLoivsbUnzgC7a6K7uwV_vTNtlT4Lgpe2hHUoymXyTmfmGkLMUCUZyY5lxSjMs1WRaccOcFMr7FnrOedVsQnU6Wb-vu82B27hJq5zaxMpQu2jxjPxSJFVPnbZUV-8fDLtGYXS1aaExTxYFQBlcmKo_Ywtv1SzM2FCbwb7an1XwXA4viuEo5shYySXSd6Ls31Fmtdvcr_33P9fJaoMz6XWtGBtkzpebZPmxiaRvkUl3FKdVluf0yZQuvhXf3tHbOnf9FR67xSQCNqc9VFIaA70pokNyCYf1VvQGY_axpIA88a1n8L79iAIIpigbQSzIdfXU017NXrBNXu7vercPrOnBwKxs6U_mleUpgChYqU7ZTGqTmyANh1uWByFE4jB0aMAvCtaHvJ3ztO1FGhxPjJYtvkMWylj6PUIlN1aDOdVWOelSnZkA7olKgvKZsGnYJ6fTER2AjmPgwpQ-fo0HszHdJ7v1tAzeazKOgdCJ4OD0HPzh60OygtNdZ6MckcUAK9wfkyU7-SzGo5NKeeDa6T7-AAfL0GI
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospective%2C+Randomized+Controlled+Pivotal+Trial+of+Biodegradable+Balloon+Rectal+Spacer+for+Prostate+Radiation+Therapy&rft.jtitle=International+journal+of+radiation+oncology%2C+biology%2C+physics&rft.au=Song%2C+Daniel&rft.au=Dabkowski%2C+Mateusz&rft.au=Costa%2C+Paulo&rft.au=Nurani%2C+Rizwan&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.eissn=1879-355X&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1410&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ijrobp.2024.07.2145&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F39032758&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F39032758&rft.externalDocID=39032758
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1879-355X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1879-355X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1879-355X&client=summon