A real-life experience with eculizumab and efgartigimod in generalized myasthenia gravis patients

Introduction Eculizumab, a complement active antibody, and efgartigimod, an Fc fragment that blocks neonatal Fc receptor, are both approved to treat generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) patients. The objective of this study is to describe the clinical response to both treatments in a real-life settin...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Journal of neurology Ročník 271; číslo 9; s. 6209 - 6219
Hlavní autoři: Pane, Chiara, Di Stefano, Vincenzo, Cuomo, Nunzia, Sarnataro, Alessio, Vinciguerra, Claudia, Bevilacqua, Liliana, Brighina, Filippo, Rini, Nicasio, Puorro, Giorgia, Marsili, Angela, Garibaldi, Matteo, Fionda, Laura, Saccà, Francesco
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.09.2024
Springer Nature B.V
Témata:
ISSN:0340-5354, 1432-1459, 1432-1459
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Introduction Eculizumab, a complement active antibody, and efgartigimod, an Fc fragment that blocks neonatal Fc receptor, are both approved to treat generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) patients. The objective of this study is to describe the clinical response to both treatments in a real-life setting. Methods We collected baseline and follow-up clinical data using the Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG). We included 63 patients, 32 treated with eculizumab and 31 with efgartigimod. Of the efgartigimod-treated patients, 22 were anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR-Ab +) and 9 were AChR-Ab- (3 MuSK-Ab + and 6 seronegative). Results Both treatments showed similar efficacy relative to the MG-ADL scale reduction ( p  = 0.237). Efgartigimod had a similar effect on both AChR-Ab + and AChR-Ab- ( p  = 0.280). Eculizumab was superior to efgartigimod relative to the QMG score reduction for the entire dataset ( p  = 0.003) and was more likely to achieve a clinical response at the QMG compared to efgartigimod (OR 1.373; p  = 0.016). Steroid-sparing effect was higher for eculizumab than efgartigimod ( – 16.7 vs  – 5.2 mg of the baseline daily dose at follow-up; p  = 0.001). Mean speed of prednisone reduction was  – 13.1 mg of the daily dose for each month of follow-up for eculizumab-treated patients and  – 3.2 for efgartigimod ( p  = 0.001). We found three serious events, all not related to treatment in the investigator’s opinion. One eculizumab-treated patient experienced a severe pneumonia and died despite treatment. Conclusions Our study provides evidence that eculizumab and efgartigimod can be used in clinical practice to reduce disability in gMG patients. Eculizumab-treated patients had a higher QMG response and steroid sparing effect. Efgartigimod may offer a more flexible schedule due to its cyclical use, no need for vaccination, and efficacy in AChR-Ab- patients.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0340-5354
1432-1459
1432-1459
DOI:10.1007/s00415-024-12588-7