Is habitat fragmentation bad for biodiversity?

In a review of landscape-scale empirical studies, Fahrig (2017a) found that ecological responses to habitat fragmentation per se (fragmentation independent of habitat amount) were usually non-significant (>70% of responses) and that 76% of significant relationships were positive, with species abu...

Celý popis

Uložené v:

Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:	Biological conservation Ročník 230; s. 179 - 186
Hlavní autori:	Fahrig, Lenore, Arroyo-Rodríguez, Víctor, Bennett, Joseph R., Boucher-Lalonde, Véronique, Cazetta, Eliana, Currie, David J., Eigenbrod, Felix, Ford, Adam T., Harrison, Susan P., Jaeger, Jochen A.G., Koper, Nicola, Martin, Amanda E., Martin, Jean-Louis, Metzger, Jean Paul, Morrison, Peter, Rhodes, Jonathan R., Saunders, Denis A., Simberloff, Daniel, Smith, Adam C., Tischendorf, Lutz, Vellend, Mark, Watling, James I.
Médium:	Journal Article
Jazyk:	English
Vydavateľské údaje:	Elsevier Ltd 01.02.2019 Elsevier
Predmet:	Biodiversity and Ecology Corridors Cross-scale extrapolation ecological value Edge effect edge effects empirical research environmental impact Environmental Sciences Global Changes Habitat diversity habitat fragmentation Habitat fragmentation per se Habitat loss habitats Landscape configuration Landscape heterogeneity landscapes Patch isolation Patch size prediction risk SLOSS Spatial scale species abundance SLOSS Edge effect Habitat loss Cross-scale extrapolation Landscape configuration Corridors Habitat fragmentation per se Landscape heterogeneity Patch size Habitat diversity Spatial scale Patch isolation
ISSN:	0006-3207, 1873-2917
On-line prístup:	Získať plný text
Tagy:	Pridať tag Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!

Buďte prvý, kto okomentuje tento záznam!