Hegemony and its discontents: a critical analysis of organizational knowledge transfer

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to discuss the phenomenon of knowledge transfer within multinational corporations (MNCs), and how the imperatives of thought and action that constitute new knowledge are received in the terrain that constitutes the MNC subsidiary.Design methodology approach - T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical perspectives on international business Jg. 4; H. 2/3; S. 203 - 227
Hauptverfasser: Mir, Raza, Bobby Banerjee, Subhabrata, Mir, Ali
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Bradford Emerald Group Publishing Limited 02.05.2008
Schlagworte:
ISSN:1742-2043, 1758-6062
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to discuss the phenomenon of knowledge transfer within multinational corporations (MNCs), and how the imperatives of thought and action that constitute new knowledge are received in the terrain that constitutes the MNC subsidiary.Design methodology approach - This study employs an ethnographic approach, and juxtaposes primary data collection with a variety of secondary data sources.Findings - The data are analyzed in light of the theoretical construct of hegemony, and three themes theorized that underlie the process of knowledge transfer. These include knowledge loss at the local level, the coercive practices that ensure knowledge transfer, and the invocation of imperial subjectivities by the headquarters of the MNC when dealing with subsidiaries from poorer nations.Originality value - This paper goes beyond the mainstream approaches into organizational knowledge transfer, by analyzing these issues in light of political economy, and the changing landscape of industrial accumulation. It offers in some measure, the building blocks of a different organizational theory, one that is sensitive to those subjects who are consigned to the periphery of mainstream organizing.
Bibliographie:original-pdf:2900040207.pdf
istex:B94100E3BE999DDC8186EACFCE7B484FDE722BF8
ark:/67375/4W2-FCZ84QD9-K
href:17422040810869990.pdf
filenameID:2900040207
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1742-2043
1758-6062
DOI:10.1108/17422040810869990