Accuracy of dynamic navigation in implant surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Objective To assess the accuracy of dynamic computer‐assisted implant surgery. Materials and methods An electronic search up to March 2020 was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial to identify studies using dynamic navigation in implant surgery, and ad...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Clinical oral implants research Ročník 32; číslo 4; s. 383 - 393
Hlavní autoři: Wei, Shi‐Min, Zhu, Yu, Wei, Jian‐Xu, Zhang, Chu‐Nan, Shi, Jun‐Yu, Lai, Hong‐Chang
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Denmark Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.04.2021
Témata:
ISSN:0905-7161, 1600-0501, 1600-0501
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract Objective To assess the accuracy of dynamic computer‐assisted implant surgery. Materials and methods An electronic search up to March 2020 was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial to identify studies using dynamic navigation in implant surgery, and additional manual search was performed as well. Clinical trials and model studies were selected. The primary outcome was accuracy. A single‐arm meta‐analysis of continuous data was conducted. Meta‐regression was utilized for comparison on study design, guidance method, jaw, and systems. Results Ten studies, four randomized controlled trials (RCT) and six prospective studies, met the inclusion criteria. A total of 1,298 drillings and implants were evaluated. The meta‐analysis of the accuracy (five clinical trials and five model studies) revealed average global platform deviation, global apex deviation, and angular deviation were 1.02 mm, 95% CI (0.83, 1.21), 1.33 mm, 95% CI (0.98, 1.67), and 3.59°, 95% CI (2.09, 5.09). Meta‐regression shown no difference between model studies and clinical trials (p = .295, 0.336, 0.185), drilling holes and implant (p = .36, 0.279, 0.695), maxilla and mandible (p = .875, 0.632, 0.281), and five different systems (p = .762, 0.342, 0.336). Conclusion Accuracy of dynamic computer‐aided implant surgery reaches a clinically acceptable range and has potential in clinical usage, but more patient‐centered outcomes and socio‐economic benefits should be reported.
AbstractList ObjectiveTo assess the accuracy of dynamic computer‐assisted implant surgery.Materials and methodsAn electronic search up to March 2020 was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial to identify studies using dynamic navigation in implant surgery, and additional manual search was performed as well. Clinical trials and model studies were selected. The primary outcome was accuracy. A single‐arm meta‐analysis of continuous data was conducted. Meta‐regression was utilized for comparison on study design, guidance method, jaw, and systems.ResultsTen studies, four randomized controlled trials (RCT) and six prospective studies, met the inclusion criteria. A total of 1,298 drillings and implants were evaluated. The meta‐analysis of the accuracy (five clinical trials and five model studies) revealed average global platform deviation, global apex deviation, and angular deviation were 1.02 mm, 95% CI (0.83, 1.21), 1.33 mm, 95% CI (0.98, 1.67), and 3.59°, 95% CI (2.09, 5.09). Meta‐regression shown no difference between model studies and clinical trials (p = .295, 0.336, 0.185), drilling holes and implant (p = .36, 0.279, 0.695), maxilla and mandible (p = .875, 0.632, 0.281), and five different systems (p = .762, 0.342, 0.336).ConclusionAccuracy of dynamic computer‐aided implant surgery reaches a clinically acceptable range and has potential in clinical usage, but more patient‐centered outcomes and socio‐economic benefits should be reported.
Objective To assess the accuracy of dynamic computer‐assisted implant surgery. Materials and methods An electronic search up to March 2020 was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial to identify studies using dynamic navigation in implant surgery, and additional manual search was performed as well. Clinical trials and model studies were selected. The primary outcome was accuracy. A single‐arm meta‐analysis of continuous data was conducted. Meta‐regression was utilized for comparison on study design, guidance method, jaw, and systems. Results Ten studies, four randomized controlled trials (RCT) and six prospective studies, met the inclusion criteria. A total of 1,298 drillings and implants were evaluated. The meta‐analysis of the accuracy (five clinical trials and five model studies) revealed average global platform deviation, global apex deviation, and angular deviation were 1.02 mm, 95% CI (0.83, 1.21), 1.33 mm, 95% CI (0.98, 1.67), and 3.59°, 95% CI (2.09, 5.09). Meta‐regression shown no difference between model studies and clinical trials (p = .295, 0.336, 0.185), drilling holes and implant (p = .36, 0.279, 0.695), maxilla and mandible (p = .875, 0.632, 0.281), and five different systems (p = .762, 0.342, 0.336). Conclusion Accuracy of dynamic computer‐aided implant surgery reaches a clinically acceptable range and has potential in clinical usage, but more patient‐centered outcomes and socio‐economic benefits should be reported.
To assess the accuracy of dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery. An electronic search up to March 2020 was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial to identify studies using dynamic navigation in implant surgery, and additional manual search was performed as well. Clinical trials and model studies were selected. The primary outcome was accuracy. A single-arm meta-analysis of continuous data was conducted. Meta-regression was utilized for comparison on study design, guidance method, jaw, and systems. Ten studies, four randomized controlled trials (RCT) and six prospective studies, met the inclusion criteria. A total of 1,298 drillings and implants were evaluated. The meta-analysis of the accuracy (five clinical trials and five model studies) revealed average global platform deviation, global apex deviation, and angular deviation were 1.02 mm, 95% CI (0.83, 1.21), 1.33 mm, 95% CI (0.98, 1.67), and 3.59°, 95% CI (2.09, 5.09). Meta-regression shown no difference between model studies and clinical trials (p = .295, 0.336, 0.185), drilling holes and implant (p = .36, 0.279, 0.695), maxilla and mandible (p = .875, 0.632, 0.281), and five different systems (p = .762, 0.342, 0.336). Accuracy of dynamic computer-aided implant surgery reaches a clinically acceptable range and has potential in clinical usage, but more patient-centered outcomes and socio-economic benefits should be reported.
To assess the accuracy of dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery.OBJECTIVETo assess the accuracy of dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery.An electronic search up to March 2020 was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial to identify studies using dynamic navigation in implant surgery, and additional manual search was performed as well. Clinical trials and model studies were selected. The primary outcome was accuracy. A single-arm meta-analysis of continuous data was conducted. Meta-regression was utilized for comparison on study design, guidance method, jaw, and systems.MATERIALS AND METHODSAn electronic search up to March 2020 was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial to identify studies using dynamic navigation in implant surgery, and additional manual search was performed as well. Clinical trials and model studies were selected. The primary outcome was accuracy. A single-arm meta-analysis of continuous data was conducted. Meta-regression was utilized for comparison on study design, guidance method, jaw, and systems.Ten studies, four randomized controlled trials (RCT) and six prospective studies, met the inclusion criteria. A total of 1,298 drillings and implants were evaluated. The meta-analysis of the accuracy (five clinical trials and five model studies) revealed average global platform deviation, global apex deviation, and angular deviation were 1.02 mm, 95% CI (0.83, 1.21), 1.33 mm, 95% CI (0.98, 1.67), and 3.59°, 95% CI (2.09, 5.09). Meta-regression shown no difference between model studies and clinical trials (p = .295, 0.336, 0.185), drilling holes and implant (p = .36, 0.279, 0.695), maxilla and mandible (p = .875, 0.632, 0.281), and five different systems (p = .762, 0.342, 0.336).RESULTSTen studies, four randomized controlled trials (RCT) and six prospective studies, met the inclusion criteria. A total of 1,298 drillings and implants were evaluated. The meta-analysis of the accuracy (five clinical trials and five model studies) revealed average global platform deviation, global apex deviation, and angular deviation were 1.02 mm, 95% CI (0.83, 1.21), 1.33 mm, 95% CI (0.98, 1.67), and 3.59°, 95% CI (2.09, 5.09). Meta-regression shown no difference between model studies and clinical trials (p = .295, 0.336, 0.185), drilling holes and implant (p = .36, 0.279, 0.695), maxilla and mandible (p = .875, 0.632, 0.281), and five different systems (p = .762, 0.342, 0.336).Accuracy of dynamic computer-aided implant surgery reaches a clinically acceptable range and has potential in clinical usage, but more patient-centered outcomes and socio-economic benefits should be reported.CONCLUSIONAccuracy of dynamic computer-aided implant surgery reaches a clinically acceptable range and has potential in clinical usage, but more patient-centered outcomes and socio-economic benefits should be reported.
Author Zhang, Chu‐Nan
Zhu, Yu
Shi, Jun‐Yu
Wei, Shi‐Min
Wei, Jian‐Xu
Lai, Hong‐Chang
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Shi‐Min
  surname: Wei
  fullname: Wei, Shi‐Min
  organization: Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology & Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Yu
  surname: Zhu
  fullname: Zhu, Yu
  organization: Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology & Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Jian‐Xu
  surname: Wei
  fullname: Wei, Jian‐Xu
  organization: Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology & Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Chu‐Nan
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Chu‐Nan
  organization: Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology & Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Jun‐Yu
  surname: Shi
  fullname: Shi, Jun‐Yu
  email: SJY0511@hotmail.com
  organization: Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology & Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Hong‐Chang
  orcidid: 0000-0002-6922-2918
  surname: Lai
  fullname: Lai, Hong‐Chang
  email: lhc9@hotmail.com
  organization: Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology & Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33540465$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp1kU1qHDEQhUVwiMdOFr6AEXjjLNoutdTdknfDkD8YCIRkk43QVFcbmf4ZS902vfMRfMacJIpnvDFxUVCb7z2K947YQT_0xNiJgAuR5hLbcCFkJcwbthAlQAYFiAO2AANFVolSHLKjGG8AoDTavGOHUhYKVFks2O8l4hQcznxoeD33rvPIe3fnr93oh577tN22df3I4xSuKcxXfMnjHEfqEoE80J2ne-76mnc0uj8Pj6537Rx9fM_eNq6N9GF_j9mvz59-rr5m6-9fvq2W6wyVMCbLG9RoKHeocpUDSChrs5EFoXS6UeVGoTQGFZHOzUaDbCTWtZC60bJWdS6P2fnOdxuG24niaDsfkdr0NA1TtLnSlSik0TKhZy_Qm2EK6d9EFUJCLitdJep0T02bjmq7Db5zYbbPqSXgcgdgGGIM1Fj041NeY3C-tQLsv15s6sU-9ZIUH18onk3_x-7d731L8-ugXa1_7BR_AQH7nJg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2024_105034
crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_14034
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_024_04033_y
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41432_025_01171_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2024_105035
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_025_05837_2
crossref_primary_10_3390_dj10100187
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jormas_2025_102292
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2023_107560
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_024_05780_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ceh_2025_03_001
crossref_primary_10_3390_osteology5020018
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joen_2023_06_012
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_coms_2024_10_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2023_104451
crossref_primary_10_1111_prd_12458
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10006_024_01317_z
crossref_primary_10_1051_mbcb_2025010
crossref_primary_10_1177_00220345241285566
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_83997_x
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_023_03079_8
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40729_025_00627_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2024_02_015
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2022_104070
crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_14255
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_medengphy_2022_103783
crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_13961
crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_14412
crossref_primary_10_1177_00220345251332511
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_023_02792_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2023_104567
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2023_10_032
crossref_primary_10_2186_jpr_JPR_D_23_00299
crossref_primary_10_1615_JLongTermEffMedImplants_2025038533
crossref_primary_10_3390_app14209253
crossref_primary_10_12998_wjcc_v10_i12_3907
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijom_2025_02_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jormas_2025_102271
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_023_03641_4
crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_14243
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2025_105962
crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_70009
crossref_primary_10_3390_prosthesis7010020
crossref_primary_10_1111_eje_12975
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2025_105722
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2023_104679
crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_13839
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2024_11_013
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jds_2023_06_002
crossref_primary_10_1177_20552076241253550
crossref_primary_10_3390_jpm13020362
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2022_e10565
crossref_primary_10_3389_fdmed_2023_1242547
crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_14112
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_024_03947_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2025_105593
crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_14237
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2022_104265
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_021_04247_2
crossref_primary_10_2196_42040
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_024_04324_4
crossref_primary_10_3390_app13021185
crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_14192
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2021_754943
crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_14470
crossref_primary_10_3390_app11146593
crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_14188
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_023_05161_5
crossref_primary_10_1111_jcpe_13893
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40729_022_00464_w
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2023_104534
crossref_primary_10_3390_app13148315
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2023_106568
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2022_03_014
crossref_primary_10_1111_cid_13360
crossref_primary_10_2186_jpr_JPR_D_24_00257
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joms_2022_11_003
crossref_primary_10_1177_00220345241253794
crossref_primary_10_3390_bioengineering11020155
crossref_primary_10_1111_cid_13129
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40729_025_00648_0
crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_14213
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jds_2023_05_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2024_105218
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2025_105814
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2023_104642
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2025_105938
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_29633_6
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_023_03481_2
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_024_04327_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2024_105290
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdsr_2024_01_002
crossref_primary_10_4103_jips_jips_372_24
crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_14168
crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_14201
crossref_primary_10_3390_bioengineering12090927
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2022_07_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2025_08_032
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_024_05265_8
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm10091808
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jds_2022_12_014
crossref_primary_10_1111_cid_13383
crossref_primary_10_1111_cid_13307
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2023_07_031
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2022_104170
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2023_11_033
Cites_doi 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001079.x
10.1111/prd.12175
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01133.x
10.1111/clr.12414
10.1111/prd.12051
10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00025
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005
10.1016/j.joms.2017.02.026
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02070.x
10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g1.2
10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60072-8
10.3390/jcm8122123
10.1111/eje.12447
10.11607/jomi.6585
10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.035
10.1097/SCS.0b013e31822e6305
10.11607/jomi.6966
10.1002/9780470743386.ch23
10.1053/apnr.2002.34181
10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00110.x
10.1007/s11548-013-0946-z
10.1111/clr.13346
10.1902/jop.2009.090348
10.1902/jop.2008.080059
10.1111/clr.13435
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02552.x
10.1111/clr.13563
10.1111/clr.13382
10.2319/122106-52.1
10.1016/j.aanat.2019.04.005
10.11607/jomi.5004
10.1111/prd.12161
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Copyright © 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S
Copyright_xml – notice: 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
– notice: 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
– notice: Copyright © 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QO
7QP
8FD
FR3
K9.
P64
7X8
DOI 10.1111/clr.13719
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)

MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Dentistry
EISSN 1600-0501
EndPage 393
ExternalDocumentID 33540465
10_1111_clr_13719
CLR13719
Genre reviewArticle
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases
  funderid: 19411950100
– fundername: Multicenter Clinical Research Program of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
  funderid: DLY201822
– fundername: Clinical Research Plan of SHDC
  funderid: 16CR3033A
– fundername: Multicenter Clinical Research Program of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
  grantid: DLY201822
– fundername: Clinical Research Plan of SHDC
  grantid: 16CR3033A
– fundername: Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases
  grantid: 19411950100
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OB
1OC
29B
31~
33P
34H
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
6J9
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAKAS
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACIWK
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZCM
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFNX
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFRAH
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AHEFC
AIACR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
CWXXS
D-E
D-F
DC6
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
EBD
EBS
EJD
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
FZ0
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.T
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
K48
KBYEO
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P4D
PALCI
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SAMSI
SUPJJ
TEORI
UB1
V8K
V9Y
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WBNRW
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WOHZO
WPGGZ
WQJ
WRC
WXSBR
XG1
YFH
YUY
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
AAMMB
AAYXX
AEFGJ
AEYWJ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AGYGG
AIDQK
AIDYY
AIQQE
CITATION
O8X
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QO
7QP
8FD
FR3
K9.
P64
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4199-2fc8c9e2ac424200306d9b35ec3a8f46b4c399c4ee829b803f3cdd138f83d4d23
IEDL.DBID DRFUL
ISICitedReferencesCount 114
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000619163100001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0905-7161
1600-0501
IngestDate Sun Nov 09 13:02:24 EST 2025
Tue Oct 07 07:19:17 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:02:07 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 04:10:00 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 21:31:34 EST 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:29:07 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Keywords image-guided surgery
computer-assisted surgery
dental implants
dynamic navigation
tooth implants
Language English
License 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4199-2fc8c9e2ac424200306d9b35ec3a8f46b4c399c4ee829b803f3cdd138f83d4d23
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-4
ORCID 0000-0002-6922-2918
PMID 33540465
PQID 2513023787
PQPubID 2045176
PageCount 12
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2487153983
proquest_journals_2513023787
pubmed_primary_33540465
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_clr_13719
crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_13719
wiley_primary_10_1111_clr_13719_CLR13719
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate April 2021
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2021
  text: April 2021
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Denmark
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Denmark
– name: Brussels
PublicationTitle Clinical oral implants research
PublicationTitleAlternate Clin Oral Implants Res
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References 2019; 8
2018; 29
2009; 24
2002; 15
2009; 62
2019; 30
2010; 103
2016; 32
2009
2019; 225
2006; 130
2008; 78
2008; 79
2014; 29
2010; 81
73
2014; 66
2017; 73
2009; 11
2017; 75
2015; 26
2020; 31
2019; 22
2019; 24
2019; 23
2016; 42
2011; 22
2014; 9
2018; 34
2005; 16
2018; 33
2001; 12
2012; 23
e_1_2_9_30_1
e_1_2_9_31_1
e_1_2_9_11_1
e_1_2_9_34_1
e_1_2_9_10_1
e_1_2_9_35_1
e_1_2_9_13_1
e_1_2_9_32_1
e_1_2_9_12_1
e_1_2_9_33_1
e_1_2_9_15_1
e_1_2_9_14_1
e_1_2_9_36_1
e_1_2_9_16_1
e_1_2_9_19_1
Jung R. E. (e_1_2_9_18_1) 2009; 24
e_1_2_9_20_1
e_1_2_9_22_1
e_1_2_9_21_1
e_1_2_9_24_1
e_1_2_9_23_1
e_1_2_9_8_1
e_1_2_9_7_1
e_1_2_9_6_1
e_1_2_9_5_1
e_1_2_9_4_1
e_1_2_9_3_1
Pellegrino G. (e_1_2_9_26_1) 2019; 22
e_1_2_9_2_1
Jorba‐García A. (e_1_2_9_17_1) 2019; 24
e_1_2_9_9_1
e_1_2_9_25_1
e_1_2_9_28_1
e_1_2_9_27_1
e_1_2_9_29_1
References_xml – volume: 34
  start-page: 205
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  end-page: 213
  article-title: Accuracy of a dynamic dental implant navigation system in a private practice
  publication-title: The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
– volume: 24
  start-page: 92
  issue: Suppl
  year: 2009
  end-page: 109
  article-title: Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: A systematic review
  publication-title: International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants
– volume: 15
  start-page: 197
  issue: 3
  year: 2002
  end-page: 198
  article-title: Popping the (PICO) question in research and evidence‐based practice
  publication-title: Applied Nursing Research
– volume: 23
  start-page: 112
  issue: Suppl 6
  year: 2012
  end-page: 123
  article-title: Accuracy of computer‐aided implant placement
  publication-title: Clinical Oral Implants Research
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1157
  issue: 10
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1163
  article-title: Computed tomography‐based evaluation of template (NobelGuide™)‐guided implant positions: A prospective radiological study
  publication-title: Clinical Oral Implants Research
– volume: 73
  start-page: 51
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  end-page: 72
  article-title: Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: Current concepts, indications and limitations for clinical practice and research
  publication-title: Periodontology 2000
– volume: 11
  start-page: 238
  issue: 3
  year: 2009
  end-page: 245
  article-title: Prosthetically driven, computer‐guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: A model study
  publication-title: Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
– volume: 32
  start-page: 92
  issue: 1
  year: 2016
  end-page: 99
  article-title: Implant placement accuracy using dynamic navigation
  publication-title: The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
– volume: 225
  start-page: 1
  year: 2019
  end-page: 10
  article-title: Advantages and disadvantages of implant navigation surgery. A systematic review
  publication-title: Annals of Anatomy ‐ Anatomischer Anzeiger
– volume: 79
  start-page: 1339
  issue: 8
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1345
  article-title: Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: Clinical data from 94 implants
  publication-title: Journal of Periodontology
– volume: 22
  start-page: 139
  issue: 2
  year: 2019
  end-page: 147
  article-title: Dynamic navigation: A prospective clinical trial to evaluate the accuracy of implant placement
  publication-title: International Journal of Computerized Dentistry
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1755
  issue: 5
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1761
  article-title: Correlation between bone density and angular deviation of implants placed using CT‐generated surgical guides
  publication-title: Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
– volume: 24
  start-page: e76
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  end-page: e83
  article-title: Accuracy and the role of experience in dynamic computer guided dental implant surgery: An in‐vitro study
  publication-title: Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal
– volume: 81
  start-page: 43
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  end-page: 51
  article-title: Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer‐aided implant placement: A computed tomography‐based clinical comparative study
  publication-title: Journal of Periodontology
– volume: 30
  start-page: 505
  issue: 6
  year: 2019
  end-page: 514
  article-title: The accuracy of static vs. dynamic computer‐assisted implant surgery in single tooth space: A randomized controlled trial
  publication-title: Clinical Oral Implants Research
– volume: 23
  start-page: 415
  issue: 4
  year: 2019
  end-page: 423
  article-title: Exploring training dental implant placement using computer‐guided implant navigation system for predoctoral students: A pilot study
  publication-title: European Journal of Dental Education
– volume: 29
  start-page: 25
  issue: Suppl
  year: 2014
  end-page: 42
  article-title: Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: A systematic review
  publication-title: International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants
– volume: 66
  start-page: 203
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  end-page: 213
  article-title: Dental cone beam computed tomography: Justification for use in planning oral implant placement
  publication-title: Periodontology 2000
– volume: 9
  start-page: 733
  issue: 4
  year: 2014
  end-page: 743
  article-title: Automated implant segmentation in cone‐beam CT using edge detection and particle counting
  publication-title: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
– start-page: 221
  year: 2009
  end-page: 222
– volume: 29
  start-page: 1186
  issue: 12
  year: 2018
  end-page: 1194
  article-title: Accuracy of flapless immediate implant placement in anterior maxilla using computer‐assisted versus freehand surgery: A cadaver study
  publication-title: Clinical Oral Implants Research
– volume: 75
  start-page: 1377
  issue: 7
  year: 2017
  end-page: 1386
  article-title: Implant placement is more accurate using dynamic navigation
  publication-title: Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
– volume: 73
  start-page: 121
  issue: 1
  end-page: 133
  article-title: Current state of the art of computer‐guided implant surgery
  publication-title: Periodontology 2000
– volume: 33
  start-page: 1213
  issue: 6
  year: 2018
  end-page: 1218
  article-title: Accuracy of implant placement with a navigation system, a laboratory guide, and freehand drilling
  publication-title: International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants
– volume: 42
  year: 2016
  article-title: Accuracy of dynamic navigation for dental implant placement ‐ model based evaluation
  publication-title: Journal of Oral Implantology
– volume: 62
  start-page: 1006
  issue: 10
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1012
  article-title: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses: The PRISMA statement
  publication-title: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
– volume: 78
  start-page: 387
  year: 2008
  end-page: 395
  article-title: Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3‐dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program
  publication-title: The Angle Orthodontist
– volume: 29
  start-page: 416
  issue: Suppl 16
  year: 2018
  end-page: 435
  article-title: The accuracy of static computer‐aided implant surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
  publication-title: Clinical Oral Implants Research
– volume: 31
  start-page: 255
  issue: 3
  year: 2020
  end-page: 263
  article-title: Accuracy of dental implant placement via dynamic navigation or the freehand method: A split‐mouth randomized controlled clinical trial
  publication-title: Clinical Oral Implants Research
– volume: 103
  start-page: 334
  issue: 6
  year: 2010
  end-page: 342
  article-title: Accuracy of CAD/CAM‐guided surgical template implant surgery on human cadavers: Part I
  publication-title: Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
– volume: 16
  start-page: 495
  year: 2005
  end-page: 501
  article-title: Accuracy of image‐guided implantology
  publication-title: Clinical Oral Implants Research
– volume: 12
  start-page: 79
  issue: 1
  year: 2001
  end-page: 84
  article-title: Bone classification: An objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan
  publication-title: Clinical Oral Implants Research
– volume: 8
  start-page: 2123
  issue: 12
  year: 2019
  article-title: Accuracy of computer‐aided dynamic navigation compared to computer‐aided static navigation for dental implant placement: An in vitro study
  publication-title: Journal of Clinical Medicine
– volume: 26
  start-page: 882
  year: 2015
  end-page: 890
  article-title: Accuracy of a novel prototype dynamic computer‐assisted surgery system
  publication-title: Clinical Oral Implants Research
– volume: 130
  start-page: 410
  issue: 3
  year: 2006
  end-page: 416
  article-title: Three‐dimensional cephalometry: Spiral multi‐slice vs cone‐beam computed tomography
  publication-title: American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
– ident: e_1_2_9_23_1
  doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001079.x
– ident: e_1_2_9_11_1
  doi: 10.1111/prd.12175
– volume: 24
  start-page: 92
  year: 2009
  ident: e_1_2_9_18_1
  article-title: Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: A systematic review
  publication-title: International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants
– ident: e_1_2_9_8_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01133.x
– ident: e_1_2_9_29_1
  doi: 10.1111/clr.12414
– ident: e_1_2_9_16_1
  doi: 10.1111/prd.12051
– ident: e_1_2_9_12_1
  doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00025
– ident: e_1_2_9_22_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005
– ident: e_1_2_9_4_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.02.026
– ident: e_1_2_9_36_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02070.x
– ident: e_1_2_9_33_1
  doi: 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g1.2
– ident: e_1_2_9_28_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60072-8
– ident: e_1_2_9_21_1
  doi: 10.3390/jcm8122123
– ident: e_1_2_9_15_1
  doi: 10.1111/eje.12447
– ident: e_1_2_9_9_1
  doi: 10.11607/jomi.6585
– ident: e_1_2_9_32_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.035
– ident: e_1_2_9_24_1
  doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31822e6305
– ident: e_1_2_9_30_1
  doi: 10.11607/jomi.6966
– ident: e_1_2_9_6_1
  doi: 10.1002/9780470743386.ch23
– volume: 24
  start-page: e76
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: e_1_2_9_17_1
  article-title: Accuracy and the role of experience in dynamic computer guided dental implant surgery: An in‐vitro study
  publication-title: Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal
– ident: e_1_2_9_31_1
  doi: 10.1053/apnr.2002.34181
– ident: e_1_2_9_20_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00110.x
– ident: e_1_2_9_25_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11548-013-0946-z
– ident: e_1_2_9_34_1
  doi: 10.1111/clr.13346
– ident: e_1_2_9_2_1
  doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090348
– ident: e_1_2_9_13_1
  doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.080059
– ident: e_1_2_9_19_1
  doi: 10.1111/clr.13435
– ident: e_1_2_9_35_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02552.x
– ident: e_1_2_9_3_1
  doi: 10.1111/clr.13563
– ident: e_1_2_9_10_1
  doi: 10.1111/clr.13382
– volume: 22
  start-page: 139
  issue: 2
  year: 2019
  ident: e_1_2_9_26_1
  article-title: Dynamic navigation: A prospective clinical trial to evaluate the accuracy of implant placement
  publication-title: International Journal of Computerized Dentistry
– ident: e_1_2_9_27_1
  doi: 10.2319/122106-52.1
– ident: e_1_2_9_14_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2019.04.005
– ident: e_1_2_9_5_1
  doi: 10.11607/jomi.5004
– ident: e_1_2_9_7_1
  doi: 10.1111/prd.12161
SSID ssj0006989
Score 2.61964
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet Objective To assess the accuracy of dynamic computer‐assisted implant surgery. Materials and methods An electronic search up to March 2020 was conducted using...
To assess the accuracy of dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery. An electronic search up to March 2020 was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane...
ObjectiveTo assess the accuracy of dynamic computer‐assisted implant surgery.Materials and methodsAn electronic search up to March 2020 was conducted using...
To assess the accuracy of dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery.OBJECTIVETo assess the accuracy of dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery.An electronic...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 383
SubjectTerms Accuracy
Clinical trials
Computer-Aided Design
computer‐assisted surgery
Dental Implantation, Endosseous
Dental Implants
Dental surgery
Deviation
Drilling
dynamic navigation
Humans
image‐guided surgery
Jaw
Mandible
Mandible - surgery
Maxilla
Meta-analysis
Model accuracy
Model testing
Surgery
Surgery, Computer-Assisted
tooth implants
Title Accuracy of dynamic navigation in implant surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fclr.13719
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33540465
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2513023787
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2487153983
Volume 32
WOSCitedRecordID wos000619163100001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Online Library Full Collection 2020
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1600-0501
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0006989
  issn: 0905-7161
  databaseCode: DRFUL
  dateStart: 19990101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS-RAEC7ccWG9-NiHji_aZQ97yZJ0d5KOngZ18DDIIgrDXkI_YWHMyIwjePMn-Bv9JVZ3MlnFFQQhh0Cq6aa6np3qrwB-xNRR4fI48nBZERfKRCJzOrLoTFIR5ypxoWvJID89FcNh8XsBDuZ3YWp8iPbAzWtGsNdewaWaPlFyPZr8SljuIT8XKcpt2oHFo7P-xaA1xL43YoDai9MI04KkARbyhTzt4Ofu6EWM-TxkDT6nv_Ku1a7CchNqkl4tG2uwYKvP8OnIlwf5Dm9f4E9P69lE6lsydsTUrelJJW8C6sa4In_xubwaIe_JtL49vU965B_2M6nvvRBZGXJpr-XD3b1sME6-wkX_-PzwJGp6LUSaJ0URUaeFLiyVmqPTDpmEKRRLrWZSOJ4prjGU0dxaQQslYuaYNiZhwglmuKHsG3SqcWU3gKgMbQIzTNlEcuoB0bLMYKCGA4TCcKULP-csL3UDRO77YYzKeUKCzCoDs7rwvSW9qtE3_ke0Pd-3slHAaYlhm2-HhOaoC3vtZ1Qd_z9EVnY8QxpM1tDgF4J1Yb3e73YW5s_DeJbiYsO2vj59eTg4Cy-bbyfdgiXqa2NCBdA2dK4nM7sDH_UNCsBkFz7kQ7HbSPMjlGr2Zg
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8QwEB5EBb34fqzPKB68VNom203Fy6IuinURURAvJc0DhN2urK7gzZ_gb_SXOEm7VVFBEHoodELCZJ7p5BuAHT80ITcN37NwWR7jmfJ4ZKSn0ZnUud_IAuO6liSNdpvf3MQXI3AwvAtT4ENUB25WM5y9tgpuD6Q_abns9PcC2rCYn2MMxQjle-zosnWdVJbYNkd0WHt-3cO8ICiRhWwlTzX4qz_6FmR-jVmd02lN_2-5MzBVBpukWUjHLIzofA4mjmyBkO3xNg-3TSkHfSGfSc8QVTSnJ7l4crgbvZzc4dO97yD3yUNxf3qfNMkH-jMpbr4QkSvS1Y_i7eVVlCgnC3DdOr46PPHKbgueZEEce6GRXMY6FJKh23a5hIozWteSCm5YlDGJwYxkWvMwzrhPDZVKBZQbThVTIV2E0byX62UgWYRWgSqa6UCw0EKiRZHCUA0H8AwDlhrsDnmeyhKK3HbE6KTDlASZlTpm1WC7Ir0v8Dd-IlobblxaquBDioGbbYiEBqkGW9VnVB77R0TkujdAGkzX0OTHnNZgqdjwahZqT8RYVMfFun39ffr0MLl0Lyt_J92EiZOr8yRNTttnqzAZ2koZVw-0BqOP_YFeh3H5hMLQ3yiF-h2Ff_lu
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1bS8MwFD7IFPXF-2Veo_jgS6Vtsi4VX4ZzKI4hoiC-lDQXEGY3phN88yf4G_0lnqRdVVQQhD4UekLCSc4l6cn3Aez5oQm5qfuehcvyGE-VxyMjPY3BpMb9ehoYx1rSrnc6_OYmvhiDo9FdmBwfojxws5bh_LU1cN1X5pOVy-7gIKB1i_k5ziyJTAXGm5et63bpiS05osPa82se7guCAlnIVvKUjb_Go29J5tec1QWd1uz_hjsHM0WySRr56piHMZ0twFTTFghZjrdFuG1IORwI-Ux6hqicnJ5k4snhbvQycofPfb-L2icP-f3pQ9IgH-jPJL_5QkSmyL1-FG8vr6JAOVmC69bJ1fGpV7AteJIFceyFRnIZ61BIhmHb7SVUnNKallRww6KUSUxmJNOah3HKfWqoVCqg3HCqmArpMlSyXqZXgaQRegWqaKoDwUILiRZFClM1bMBTTFiqsD_SeSILKHLLiNFNRlsSVFbilFWF3VK0n-Nv_CS0MZq4pDDBhwQTN0uIhA6pCjvlZzQe-0dEZLo3RBncrqHLjzmtwko-4WUv1J6IsaiGg3Xz-nv3yXH70r2s_V10GyYvmq2kfdY5X4fp0BbKuHKgDag8DoZ6EybkE66FwVaxpt8BGm_46Q
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy+of+dynamic+navigation+in+implant+surgery%3A+A+systematic+review+and+meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Clinical+oral+implants+research&rft.au=Wei%2C+Shi-Min&rft.au=Zhu%2C+Yu&rft.au=Wei%2C+Jian-Xu&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Chu-Nan&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.issn=1600-0501&rft.eissn=1600-0501&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=383&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fclr.13719&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0905-7161&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0905-7161&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0905-7161&client=summon