A Comparison of Voice Recognition Program and Traditional Keyboard Charting for Nurse Documentation
The purposes of this study are threefold: (1) compare the document times between a voice recognition system and keyboard charting, (2) compare the number of errors between the two methods, and (3) identify factors influencing documentation time. Voice recognition systems are considered a potential s...
Uložené v:
| Vydané v: | Computers, informatics, nursing Ročník 40; číslo 2; s. 90 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autori: | , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | English |
| Vydavateľské údaje: |
United States
04.08.2021
|
| Predmet: | |
| ISSN: | 1538-9774, 1538-9774 |
| On-line prístup: | Zistit podrobnosti o prístupe |
| Tagy: |
Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
|
| Abstract | The purposes of this study are threefold: (1) compare the document times between a voice recognition system and keyboard charting, (2) compare the number of errors between the two methods, and (3) identify factors influencing documentation time. Voice recognition systems are considered a potential solution to decrease documentation time. However, little is known to what extent voice recognition systems can save nurses' documentation time. A pilot, simulation study was conducted using a voice recognition system and keyboard charting with 15 acute care nurses. A crossover method with repeated measures was utilized. Each nurse was given two simple and two complex assessment scenarios, assigned in random order, to document using both methods. Paired t-tests and multivariate linear regression models were used for data analysis. The voice recognition method saved the nurses 2.3 minutes (simple scenario) and 6.1 minutes (complex scenario) on average and was statistically significant (P < .001). There were no significant differences in errors or factors identified influencing documentation times. Eighty percent reported a preference of using voice recognition systems, and 87% agreed this method helped speed up charting. This study can show how a voice recognition system can improve documentation times compared with keyboard charting while still having thorough documentation. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | The purposes of this study are threefold: (1) compare the document times between a voice recognition system and keyboard charting, (2) compare the number of errors between the two methods, and (3) identify factors influencing documentation time. Voice recognition systems are considered a potential solution to decrease documentation time. However, little is known to what extent voice recognition systems can save nurses' documentation time. A pilot, simulation study was conducted using a voice recognition system and keyboard charting with 15 acute care nurses. A crossover method with repeated measures was utilized. Each nurse was given two simple and two complex assessment scenarios, assigned in random order, to document using both methods. Paired t-tests and multivariate linear regression models were used for data analysis. The voice recognition method saved the nurses 2.3 minutes (simple scenario) and 6.1 minutes (complex scenario) on average and was statistically significant (P < .001). There were no significant differences in errors or factors identified influencing documentation times. Eighty percent reported a preference of using voice recognition systems, and 87% agreed this method helped speed up charting. This study can show how a voice recognition system can improve documentation times compared with keyboard charting while still having thorough documentation.The purposes of this study are threefold: (1) compare the document times between a voice recognition system and keyboard charting, (2) compare the number of errors between the two methods, and (3) identify factors influencing documentation time. Voice recognition systems are considered a potential solution to decrease documentation time. However, little is known to what extent voice recognition systems can save nurses' documentation time. A pilot, simulation study was conducted using a voice recognition system and keyboard charting with 15 acute care nurses. A crossover method with repeated measures was utilized. Each nurse was given two simple and two complex assessment scenarios, assigned in random order, to document using both methods. Paired t-tests and multivariate linear regression models were used for data analysis. The voice recognition method saved the nurses 2.3 minutes (simple scenario) and 6.1 minutes (complex scenario) on average and was statistically significant (P < .001). There were no significant differences in errors or factors identified influencing documentation times. Eighty percent reported a preference of using voice recognition systems, and 87% agreed this method helped speed up charting. This study can show how a voice recognition system can improve documentation times compared with keyboard charting while still having thorough documentation. The purposes of this study are threefold: (1) compare the document times between a voice recognition system and keyboard charting, (2) compare the number of errors between the two methods, and (3) identify factors influencing documentation time. Voice recognition systems are considered a potential solution to decrease documentation time. However, little is known to what extent voice recognition systems can save nurses' documentation time. A pilot, simulation study was conducted using a voice recognition system and keyboard charting with 15 acute care nurses. A crossover method with repeated measures was utilized. Each nurse was given two simple and two complex assessment scenarios, assigned in random order, to document using both methods. Paired t-tests and multivariate linear regression models were used for data analysis. The voice recognition method saved the nurses 2.3 minutes (simple scenario) and 6.1 minutes (complex scenario) on average and was statistically significant (P < .001). There were no significant differences in errors or factors identified influencing documentation times. Eighty percent reported a preference of using voice recognition systems, and 87% agreed this method helped speed up charting. This study can show how a voice recognition system can improve documentation times compared with keyboard charting while still having thorough documentation. |
| Author | Edwards, Nancy Bokhart, Gordon Xu, Dongjuan Mayer, LeAnn |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: LeAnn surname: Mayer fullname: Mayer, LeAnn organization: Author Affiliations: Clinical Assistant Professor (Dr Mayer), School of Nursing, Indiana University of Fort Wayne; Assistant Professor (Dr Xu) and Professor (Dr Edwards), School of Nursing, Purdue University, West Lafayette; and Director of Research (Dr Bokhart), Lutheran Hospital, Fort Wayne, IN – sequence: 2 givenname: Dongjuan surname: Xu fullname: Xu, Dongjuan – sequence: 3 givenname: Nancy surname: Edwards fullname: Edwards, Nancy – sequence: 4 givenname: Gordon surname: Bokhart fullname: Bokhart, Gordon |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34347642$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNpNkEtPwzAQhC1URB_wDxDykUuLHdu1fazCq6IqCBWu0SaxS1BiFzs59N8ToEidw-5o9tMeZowGzjuD0CUlM0q0vEmX6xk5ltTsBI2oYGqqpeSDIz9E4xg_CaFCUn2GhowzLuc8GaFigVPf7CBU0TvsLX73VWHwqyn81lVt1YcvwW8DNBhciTcByt8Uavxk9rmHUOL0A0JbuS22PuB1F6LBt77oGuNa-GHP0amFOpqLw56gt_u7Tfo4XT0_LNPFalpwqng_rQUqZSEUtSZRxiprDWGSSaIBJOkPtjQlAWnnREiQuaKEJTknSmslkwm6_vu7C_6rM7HNmioWpq7BGd_FLBFCccHmQvXo1QHt8saU2S5UDYR99l9M8g3gpWgP |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1186_s12912_025_03272_w crossref_primary_10_2196_69651 crossref_primary_10_2196_51303 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. |
| DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000793 |
| DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | no_fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Nursing |
| EISSN | 1538-9774 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 34347642 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- .Z2 0-6 0R~ 2FS 3T~ 4Q1 4Q2 4Q3 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 6J9 6PF 85S 8L- 9V3 AAAAV AAHPQ AAIQE AAMTA AARTV AASCR AAUEB AAWTL ABASU ABBUW ABDIG ABILE ABNJN ABPPZ ABPXF ABVCZ ABXVJ ABZAD ABZZY ACDDN ACDOF ACEWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIFK ACIKV ACILI ACJBD ACJIL ACNCT ACNWC ACTAD ACTHT ACWDW ACWRI ACXJB ACXNZ ADBIZ ADEGP ADGGA ADGHP ADHPY ADRCX ADTGS ADUKH AFBFQ AFDTB AFMBP AFMFG AFPHX AFSOK AFYGQ AGBRE AHQNM AHVBC AHWXW AINUH AJCLO AJEOO AJIOK AJNWD AJZMW AKCTQ ALBXT ALKUP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALMTX AMJPA AMKUR AMNEI AOHHW AOQMC ATPOU AXR BQLVK C45 CGR CS3 CUY CVF DIWNM E.X EBS ECM EEVPB EIF EX3 F5P FCALG FL- GNXGY GQDEL H0~ HLJTE HYJ HZ~ H~9 I6D IKREB IN~ IYOWL JF7 JK3 JK8 K8S KD2 L-C LK2 MMDCI MPPUT NPM N~6 O9- OAG OAH OBZCC OEN OFFRU OGKNY OHCKH OKBHI OLL ON2 ONU OPUJH OROCO OUGNH OUVZD OVD OVDLW OVDNE OVOZU OWY OXXIT QMB RLZ S4R S4S T8P TEORI TSPGW UKR V2I VVN W3M WG1 WH7 WOQ WOW X3V X3W XZL YZZ ZFV 7X8 ADKSD AECEA |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4184-c4ffa177c581fe28ef8ffe0373709aa70c58fded0a7f6057a7b81032b40899872 |
| IEDL.DBID | 7X8 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 4 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=00024665-202202000-00004&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1538-9774 |
| IngestDate | Thu Oct 02 05:28:39 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:25:10 EDT 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 2 |
| Language | English |
| License | Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4184-c4ffa177c581fe28ef8ffe0373709aa70c58fded0a7f6057a7b81032b40899872 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| PMID | 34347642 |
| PQID | 2558453658 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2558453658 pubmed_primary_34347642 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 20210804 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-08-04 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 8 year: 2021 text: 20210804 day: 4 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | Computers, informatics, nursing |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Comput Inform Nurs |
| PublicationYear | 2021 |
| SSID | ssj0015719 |
| Score | 2.268835 |
| Snippet | The purposes of this study are threefold: (1) compare the document times between a voice recognition system and keyboard charting, (2) compare the number of... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
| StartPage | 90 |
| SubjectTerms | Critical Care Documentation Humans Nursing Care Voice Recognition |
| Title | A Comparison of Voice Recognition Program and Traditional Keyboard Charting for Nurse Documentation |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34347642 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2558453658 |
| Volume | 40 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos00024665-202202000-00004&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8NAEF7UKnjx_agvVvAazGOT2Z6kFIuihiIqvYXdzQ70YFKtFfz3zuZhT4JgDntISAi7855vZhi70KACK6XyMFTKE5j4ng4lul6EWhiUYOpC4XtIUzke90ZNwG3WwCpbmVgJ6rw0LkZ-SaavFHFECvNq-ua5qVEuu9qM0FhmnYhMGceYMF5kEWKoBnvUTE12Tls614PLwW1aty5sL3Cp59-MzErZDDf_-5tbbKMxM3m_potttmSLHbbWhAZ2menzwc8AQl4ifylJYPDHFk1EN0c1cIurIuek0PJJHTTkd_ZLl0RW3CXqHWaak9nL3ZctJ401f22KmYo99jy8fhrceM24Bc8I8vNoRVQBgIllgDaUFiWi9SOIwO8pBT49wNzmvgI60hgUaOna8WnhUocSwn22UpSFPWRchJhglCTS2kCQU6m0L63JjVWJxiSQXXbe7l5G5OxyFKqw5XyWLfavyw7qI8imdd-NLBKRAPKXjv7w9jFbDx36xIE7xAnrIDGzPWWr5vNjMns_q-iE1nT08A3b7sfp |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+Comparison+of+Voice+Recognition+Program+and+Traditional+Keyboard+Charting+for+Nurse+Documentation&rft.jtitle=Computers%2C+informatics%2C+nursing&rft.au=Mayer%2C+LeAnn&rft.au=Xu%2C+Dongjuan&rft.au=Edwards%2C+Nancy&rft.au=Bokhart%2C+Gordon&rft.date=2021-08-04&rft.issn=1538-9774&rft.eissn=1538-9774&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=90&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FCIN.0000000000000793&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1538-9774&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1538-9774&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1538-9774&client=summon |