Professional practice following regulatory change: An evaluation using principles of "Better Regulation"

The provisions in place internationally to regulate the practice of healthcare professionals have undergone significant change. However, this changing regulatory environment as experienced by healthcare professionals in the practice setting has not to date been widely researched. To describe the “li...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Research in social and administrative pharmacy Ročník 16; číslo 2; s. 208 - 215
Hlavní autoři: Lynch, Matthew, Kodate, Naonori
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: United States Elsevier Inc 01.02.2020
Témata:
ISSN:1551-7411, 1934-8150, 1934-8150
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract The provisions in place internationally to regulate the practice of healthcare professionals have undergone significant change. However, this changing regulatory environment as experienced by healthcare professionals in the practice setting has not to date been widely researched. To describe the “lived experience” of pharmacists in community practice in Ireland of the model of regulation introduced by the Pharmacy Act 2007 and their perception of it as fulfilling the seven principles of “better regulation”: Necessity; Effectiveness/Targeted; Proportionality; Transparency; Accountability; Consistency and Agility. 20 community pharmacists purposively selected, shared their lived experiences of the Act, as implemented in a semi-structured interview. A qualitative content analysis incorporating a framework analysis based on the seven principles of better regulation was used to analyze the data. The Act and its implementation by the Pharmaceutical Society of Ireland (PSI) was not perceived by community pharmacists overall as fulfilling the principles of better regulation. While there was agreement that the Act was necessary, its implementation by the PSI was not viewed as being effective, targeted, proportional and consistent. The PSI was considered to act as a deterrence regulator that is not adequately transparent or accountable. The Act is not sufficiently agile to respond to changes in pharmacy practice. Community pharmacists acknowledge the need for the Pharmacy Act but perceive that the PSI needs to adopt a more responsive approach to implementation if the Act is to be considered a model of better regulation. The study findings are of interest as there is little published research on how regulation is experienced by healthcare professionals who are subject to its provisions. The principles of better regulation provide an effective qualitative methodology to examine models of professional regulation based on the “lived experience” of regulatees.
AbstractList The provisions in place internationally to regulate the practice of healthcare professionals have undergone significant change. However, this changing regulatory environment as experienced by healthcare professionals in the practice setting has not to date been widely researched.BACKGROUNDThe provisions in place internationally to regulate the practice of healthcare professionals have undergone significant change. However, this changing regulatory environment as experienced by healthcare professionals in the practice setting has not to date been widely researched.To describe the "lived experience" of pharmacists in community practice in Ireland of the model of regulation introduced by the Pharmacy Act 2007 and their perception of it as fulfilling the seven principles of "better regulation": Necessity; Effectiveness/Targeted; Proportionality; Transparency; Accountability; Consistency and Agility.OBJECTIVETo describe the "lived experience" of pharmacists in community practice in Ireland of the model of regulation introduced by the Pharmacy Act 2007 and their perception of it as fulfilling the seven principles of "better regulation": Necessity; Effectiveness/Targeted; Proportionality; Transparency; Accountability; Consistency and Agility.20 community pharmacists purposively selected, shared their lived experiences of the Act, as implemented in a semi-structured interview. A qualitative content analysis incorporating a framework analysis based on the seven principles of better regulation was used to analyze the data.METHOD20 community pharmacists purposively selected, shared their lived experiences of the Act, as implemented in a semi-structured interview. A qualitative content analysis incorporating a framework analysis based on the seven principles of better regulation was used to analyze the data.The Act and its implementation by the Pharmaceutical Society of Ireland (PSI) was not perceived by community pharmacists overall as fulfilling the principles of better regulation. While there was agreement that the Act was necessary, its implementation by the PSI was not viewed as being effective, targeted, proportional and consistent. The PSI was considered to act as a deterrence regulator that is not adequately transparent or accountable. The Act is not sufficiently agile to respond to changes in pharmacy practice.RESULTSThe Act and its implementation by the Pharmaceutical Society of Ireland (PSI) was not perceived by community pharmacists overall as fulfilling the principles of better regulation. While there was agreement that the Act was necessary, its implementation by the PSI was not viewed as being effective, targeted, proportional and consistent. The PSI was considered to act as a deterrence regulator that is not adequately transparent or accountable. The Act is not sufficiently agile to respond to changes in pharmacy practice.Community pharmacists acknowledge the need for the Pharmacy Act but perceive that the PSI needs to adopt a more responsive approach to implementation if the Act is to be considered a model of better regulation. The study findings are of interest as there is little published research on how regulation is experienced by healthcare professionals who are subject to its provisions. The principles of better regulation provide an effective qualitative methodology to examine models of professional regulation based on the "lived experience" of regulatees.CONCLUSIONCommunity pharmacists acknowledge the need for the Pharmacy Act but perceive that the PSI needs to adopt a more responsive approach to implementation if the Act is to be considered a model of better regulation. The study findings are of interest as there is little published research on how regulation is experienced by healthcare professionals who are subject to its provisions. The principles of better regulation provide an effective qualitative methodology to examine models of professional regulation based on the "lived experience" of regulatees.
The provisions in place internationally to regulate the practice of healthcare professionals have undergone significant change. However, this changing regulatory environment as experienced by healthcare professionals in the practice setting has not to date been widely researched. To describe the “lived experience” of pharmacists in community practice in Ireland of the model of regulation introduced by the Pharmacy Act 2007 and their perception of it as fulfilling the seven principles of “better regulation”: Necessity; Effectiveness/Targeted; Proportionality; Transparency; Accountability; Consistency and Agility. 20 community pharmacists purposively selected, shared their lived experiences of the Act, as implemented in a semi-structured interview. A qualitative content analysis incorporating a framework analysis based on the seven principles of better regulation was used to analyze the data. The Act and its implementation by the Pharmaceutical Society of Ireland (PSI) was not perceived by community pharmacists overall as fulfilling the principles of better regulation. While there was agreement that the Act was necessary, its implementation by the PSI was not viewed as being effective, targeted, proportional and consistent. The PSI was considered to act as a deterrence regulator that is not adequately transparent or accountable. The Act is not sufficiently agile to respond to changes in pharmacy practice. Community pharmacists acknowledge the need for the Pharmacy Act but perceive that the PSI needs to adopt a more responsive approach to implementation if the Act is to be considered a model of better regulation. The study findings are of interest as there is little published research on how regulation is experienced by healthcare professionals who are subject to its provisions. The principles of better regulation provide an effective qualitative methodology to examine models of professional regulation based on the “lived experience” of regulatees.
Author Lynch, Matthew
Kodate, Naonori
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Matthew
  surname: Lynch
  fullname: Lynch, Matthew
  email: matthewlynch@rcsi.ie
  organization: School of Pharmacy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Naonori
  surname: Kodate
  fullname: Kodate, Naonori
  organization: School of Social Policy, Social Work & Social Justice, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31133538$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkUlvFDEQRi0URBb4CSArJy7deGn3AgcUorBIkUAIzpbHLs945LEb2x2Ufx8PM7lwyanq8F6Vqr5zdBJiAIReU9JSQvt32zareaPSrmWETi0RLSHDM3RGJ941IxXkpPZC0GboKD1F5zlvCeEDod0LdMop5Vzw8QxtfqRoIWcXg_J4TkoXpwHb6H3868IaJ1gvXpWY7rHeqLCG9_gqYLhTflGlWnjJe2xOLmg3e8g4Wnz5CUqBhH8e5IpdvkTPrfIZXh3rBfr9-ebX9dfm9vuXb9dXt43uKCsNn_rR9BNjgsBoppFq1Y-Dpv3A9IqsjLFGUd1ZagWHnk3WcCOM6IkRjHAN_AK9PcydU_yzQC5y57IG71WAuGTJGGdkGhnvK_rmiC6rHRhZb9ipdC8fv1OBDwdAp5hzAiu1K__OKUk5LymR-yzkVh6zkPssJBGyZlFt8Z_9uOAp7-PBg_qmOwdJZu0gaDAugS7SRPfEhAfKrqfm
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1186_s12960_023_00848_y
crossref_primary_10_1177_10497323241302239
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sapharm_2020_07_037
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rcsop_2023_100329
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40545_022_00465_5
Cites_doi 10.1080/13698575.2011.558624
10.1108/14777261011088647
10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011711
10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024270
10.1017/S0143814X00001975
10.1080/20508840.2015.1041706
10.1093/jopart/muy024
10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
10.1080/13698575.2016.1192585
10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
10.1002/j.1839-4655.2014.tb00321.x
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2019 Elsevier Inc.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2019 Elsevier Inc.
– notice: Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Pharmacy, Therapeutics, & Pharmacology
EISSN 1934-8150
EndPage 215
ExternalDocumentID 31133538
10_1016_j_sapharm_2019_05_007
S1551741119303973
Genre Evaluation Study
Journal Article
GeographicLocations Ireland
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Ireland
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.~1
0R~
123
1B1
1CY
1~.
1~5
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5VS
7-5
71M
8P~
AACTN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIAV
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AATCM
AAWTL
AAXUO
ABIVO
ABLVK
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABXDB
ABYKQ
ABZDS
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACRLP
ADBBV
ADEZE
ADMUD
AEBSH
AEKER
AFKWA
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AIEXJ
AIKHN
AITUG
AJBFU
AJOXV
AJRQY
ALCLG
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMFUW
AMRAJ
ANZVX
AXJTR
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
C45
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFLBG
EJD
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-Q
GBLVA
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KOM
LCYCR
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OGGZJ
OVD
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
RIG
ROL
RPZ
SDF
SDG
SEL
SES
SPCBC
SSH
SSP
SSZ
T5K
TEORI
~G-
9DU
AATTM
AAXKI
AAYWO
AAYXX
ABWVN
ACIEU
ACLOT
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADCNI
ADNMO
AEIPS
AEUPX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AIGII
AIIUN
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ANKPU
APXCP
CITATION
EFKBS
~HD
AGCQF
AGRNS
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-3968d692250e8d981ca687c1672cb0bddfda1c4f1f53e629fd3d5d560d5203ce3
ISICitedReferencesCount 6
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000507925300012&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1551-7411
1934-8150
IngestDate Mon Sep 29 06:34:52 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:01:59 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 07:04:44 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 21:50:24 EST 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:48:35 EST 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords Lived experience
Pharmacy law
Regulation
Healthcare professional
Community pharmacist
Implementation
Language English
License Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c412t-3968d692250e8d981ca687c1672cb0bddfda1c4f1f53e629fd3d5d560d5203ce3
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink http://hdl.handle.net/10197/12131
PMID 31133538
PQID 2232098236
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2232098236
pubmed_primary_31133538
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_sapharm_2019_05_007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sapharm_2019_05_007
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_sapharm_2019_05_007
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate February 2020
2020-02-00
20200201
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2020
  text: February 2020
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Research in social and administrative pharmacy
PublicationTitleAlternate Res Social Adm Pharm
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
References Krippendorff (bib21) 2013
PSA (bib19) 2015
Matland (bib10) 1995; 5
Department of An Taoiseach (bib18) 2004
Department of Health UK (bib31) 2017
Phipps, Noyce, Walshe, Parker, Ashcroft (bib35) 2011; 13
PSA (bib30) 2017
OECD (bib16) 1995
Holloway, Wheeler (bib20) 2002
Waring (bib1) 2010; 24
Lipsky (bib8) 1980
Reiss (bib27) 1984
Hockey (bib36) 2017
Walshe (bib12) 2003
Better Regulation Taskforce (bib17) 1998
Hjern (bib9) 1982; 2
Ayres, Braithwaite (bib15) 1992
PSI (bib25) 2018
PSI (bib33) 2010
OCP (bib34) 2019
OECD (bib6) 2014
Gallagher (bib3) 2018
Government of Ireland (bib5) 2007
Voermans (bib13) 2015; 3
Travers (bib14) 2014; 49
Gale (bib23) 2013; 13
PSI (bib38) 2016
Adams (bib4) 2018
Thomann, van Engen, Tummers (bib11) 2018; 28
O'Toole (bib7) 2000; 10
Beaussier, Demeritt, Griffiths, Rothstein (bib32) 2016; 18
PSA (bib26) 2016
Braithwaite, Healy, Dwan (bib29) 2005
Law Commission (bib37) 2014
Bengtsson (bib22) 2016; 2
Kaye (bib2) 2006; 21
Elo, Kyngäs (bib24) 2008; 62
Bourne (bib28) 2016; 6
Gallagher (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib3) 2018
Reiss (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib27) 1984
OECD (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib6)
Holloway (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib20) 2002
Ayres (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib15) 1992
Kaye (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib2) 2006; 21
Hjern (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib9) 1982; 2
PSI (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib38)
Bengtsson (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib22) 2016; 2
Better Regulation Taskforce (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib17) 1998
Gale (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib23) 2013; 13
Braithwaite (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib29) 2005
PSA (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib30)
Voermans (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib13) 2015; 3
Hockey (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib36) 2017
Law Commission (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib37)
Krippendorff (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib21) 2013
Department of An Taoiseach (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib18) 2004
PSA (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib26)
O'Toole (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib7) 2000; 10
Thomann (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib11) 2018; 28
Travers (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib14) 2014; 49
Bourne (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib28) 2016; 6
PSA (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib19)
OECD (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib16)
Department of Health UK (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib31)
Adams (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib4) 2018
PSI (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib33)
PSI (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib25)
OCP (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib34)
Phipps (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib35) 2011; 13
Elo (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib24) 2008; 62
Government of Ireland (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib5) 2007
Matland (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib10) 1995; 5
Waring (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib1) 2010; 24
Beaussier (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib32) 2016; 18
Walshe (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib12) 2003
Lipsky (10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib8) 1980
References_xml – year: 2018
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Transitioning pharmacy to “standard of care” regulation: analyzing how pharmacy regulates relative to medicine and nursing
  publication-title: Res Soc Adm Pharm
– volume: 62
  start-page: 107
  year: 2008
  end-page: 115
  ident: bib24
  article-title: The qualitative content analysis process
  publication-title: J Adv Nurs
– year: 2003
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Regulating Healthcare: A Prescription for Improvement?
– year: 1995
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Recommendation of the Council on improving the quality of government regulation
– year: 1998
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Principles of Good Regulation
– year: 2019
  ident: bib34
  article-title: Practice assessments
– start-page: 3
  year: 2002
  end-page: 25
  ident: bib20
  article-title: The nature of qualitative research : development and perspectives
  publication-title: Qualitative Research in Nursing
– volume: 6
  year: 2016
  ident: bib28
  article-title: Doctors' experiences and their perception of the most stressful aspects of complaints processes in the UK: an analysis of qualitative survey data
  publication-title: BMJ open
– year: 2014
  ident: bib37
  article-title: Scottish law commission and northern Ireland law commission. Regulation of health care professionals. Regulation of social care professionals in england
– year: 2018
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Fit to practise? Processes for dealing with misconduct among pharmacists in Australia, Canada, the UK and US
  publication-title: Res Soc Adm Pharm
– volume: 18
  start-page: 205
  year: 2016
  end-page: 224
  ident: bib32
  article-title: Accounting for failure: risk-based regulation and the problems of ensuring healthcare quality in the NHS
  publication-title: Health Risk Soc
– year: 2015
  ident: bib19
  article-title: Right-Touch regulation revised
– volume: 2
  start-page: 301
  year: 1982
  end-page: 308
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Implementation research- the link gone missing
  publication-title: J Public Policy
– volume: 49
  start-page: 403
  year: 2014
  ident: bib14
  article-title: A price worth paying? Accountability, red tape and the regulation of affordable housing
  publication-title: Aust J Soc Issues
– volume: 24
  start-page: 540
  year: 2010
  end-page: 555
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Modernising medical regulation: where are we now?
  publication-title: J Health Organ Manag
– year: 2005
  ident: bib29
  article-title: The Governance of Health Safety & Quality
– year: 2007
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Pharmacy Act 2007
– volume: 28
  start-page: 583
  year: 2018
  end-page: 601
  ident: bib11
  article-title: The necessity of discretion: a behavioural evaluation of bottom-up implementation theory
  publication-title: J Public Adm Res Theory
– volume: 2
  start-page: 8
  year: 2016
  end-page: 14
  ident: bib22
  article-title: How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis
  publication-title: NursingPlus
– volume: 3
  start-page: 91
  year: 2015
  end-page: 111
  ident: bib13
  article-title: To measure is to know: the quantification of regulation
  publication-title: Theory Pract Legisl
– year: 2004
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Regulating Better - A Government White Paper Setting Out Six Principles of Better Regulation
– start-page: 405
  year: 2017
  end-page: 418
  ident: bib36
  article-title: Regulation of health professions
  publication-title: Dale and Appelbe's Pharmacy and Medicines Law
– year: 2013
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology
– year: 2018
  ident: bib25
  article-title: Assuring public trust in pharmacy through effective regulation. Corporate strategy 2018-2020
– year: 2010
  ident: bib33
  article-title: Review of international CPD models
– volume: 13
  start-page: 277
  year: 2011
  end-page: 292
  ident: bib35
  article-title: Risk-based regulation of healthcare professionals: what are the implications for pharmacists?
  publication-title: Health Risk Soc
– year: 2014
  ident: bib6
  article-title: The governance of regulators, OECD best practice principles for regulatory policy
– volume: 13
  start-page: 117
  year: 2013
  ident: bib23
  article-title: Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research
  publication-title: BMC Med Res Methodol
– volume: 5
  start-page: 145
  year: 1995
  end-page: 174
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Synthesising the implementation literature: the ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation
  publication-title: J Public Adm Res Theory
– year: 2016
  ident: bib26
  article-title: Regulation rethought - proposals for reform
– year: 1992
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate
– volume: 10
  start-page: 263
  year: 2000
  end-page: 288
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Research on policy implementation: assessment and prospects
  publication-title: J Public Adm Res Theory
– year: 2017
  ident: bib31
  article-title: Promoting professionalism, reforming regulation
– volume: 21
  start-page: 105
  year: 2006
  end-page: 119
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Regulated (self-) regulation: a new paradigm for controlling the professions?
  publication-title: Publ Pol Adm
– year: 2016
  ident: bib38
  article-title: Future pharmacy practice in Ireland: meeting patients' needs
– start-page: 23
  year: 1984
  end-page: 35
  ident: bib27
  article-title: Selecting strategies of social control over organizational life
  publication-title: Enforcing Regulation
– year: 2017
  ident: bib30
  article-title: Right-touch reform: a new framework for assurance of professions
– year: 1980
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services
– ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib31
– year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib17
– year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib18
– year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib4
  article-title: Transitioning pharmacy to “standard of care” regulation: analyzing how pharmacy regulates relative to medicine and nursing
  publication-title: Res Soc Adm Pharm
– year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib21
– volume: 13
  start-page: 277
  issue: 3
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib35
  article-title: Risk-based regulation of healthcare professionals: what are the implications for pharmacists?
  publication-title: Health Risk Soc
  doi: 10.1080/13698575.2011.558624
– year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib3
  article-title: Fit to practise? Processes for dealing with misconduct among pharmacists in Australia, Canada, the UK and US
  publication-title: Res Soc Adm Pharm
– ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib33
– year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib5
– volume: 24
  start-page: 540
  issue: 6
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib1
  article-title: Modernising medical regulation: where are we now?
  publication-title: J Health Organ Manag
  doi: 10.1108/14777261011088647
– volume: 2
  start-page: 8
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib22
  article-title: How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis
  publication-title: NursingPlus
  doi: 10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001
– volume: 6
  issue: 7
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib28
  article-title: Doctors' experiences and their perception of the most stressful aspects of complaints processes in the UK: an analysis of qualitative survey data
  publication-title: BMJ open
  doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011711
– year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib29
– ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib38
– volume: 10
  start-page: 263
  issue: 2
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib7
  article-title: Research on policy implementation: assessment and prospects
  publication-title: J Public Adm Res Theory
  doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024270
– ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib34
– start-page: 23
  year: 1984
  ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib27
  article-title: Selecting strategies of social control over organizational life
– start-page: 405
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib36
  article-title: Regulation of health professions
– year: 1992
  ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib15
– volume: 2
  start-page: 301
  issue: 3
  year: 1982
  ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib9
  article-title: Implementation research- the link gone missing
  publication-title: J Public Policy
  doi: 10.1017/S0143814X00001975
– year: 1980
  ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib8
– ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib26
– volume: 3
  start-page: 91
  issue: 1
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib13
  article-title: To measure is to know: the quantification of regulation
  publication-title: Theory Pract Legisl
  doi: 10.1080/20508840.2015.1041706
– ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib37
– volume: 21
  start-page: 105
  issue: 3
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib2
  article-title: Regulated (self-) regulation: a new paradigm for controlling the professions?
  publication-title: Publ Pol Adm
– ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib6
– year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib12
– volume: 28
  start-page: 583
  issue: 4
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib11
  article-title: The necessity of discretion: a behavioural evaluation of bottom-up implementation theory
  publication-title: J Public Adm Res Theory
  doi: 10.1093/jopart/muy024
– ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib30
– volume: 62
  start-page: 107
  issue: 1
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib24
  article-title: The qualitative content analysis process
  publication-title: J Adv Nurs
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
– ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib16
– volume: 18
  start-page: 205
  issue: 3-4
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib32
  article-title: Accounting for failure: risk-based regulation and the problems of ensuring healthcare quality in the NHS
  publication-title: Health Risk Soc
  doi: 10.1080/13698575.2016.1192585
– volume: 5
  start-page: 145
  issue: 2
  year: 1995
  ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib10
  article-title: Synthesising the implementation literature: the ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation
  publication-title: J Public Adm Res Theory
– volume: 13
  start-page: 117
  issue: 1
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib23
  article-title: Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research
  publication-title: BMC Med Res Methodol
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
– ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib25
– volume: 49
  start-page: 403
  issue: 4
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib14
  article-title: A price worth paying? Accountability, red tape and the regulation of affordable housing
  publication-title: Aust J Soc Issues
  doi: 10.1002/j.1839-4655.2014.tb00321.x
– ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib19
– start-page: 3
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007_bib20
  article-title: The nature of qualitative research : development and perspectives
SSID ssj0037014
Score 2.216865
Snippet The provisions in place internationally to regulate the practice of healthcare professionals have undergone significant change. However, this changing...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 208
SubjectTerms Attitude of Health Personnel
Community pharmacist
Community Pharmacy Services - legislation & jurisprudence
Community Pharmacy Services - standards
Female
Government Regulation
Healthcare professional
Humans
Implementation
Ireland - epidemiology
Lived experience
Male
Pharmacists - legislation & jurisprudence
Pharmacists - standards
Pharmacy law
Professional Practice - legislation & jurisprudence
Professional Practice - standards
Professional Role
Regulation
Title Professional practice following regulatory change: An evaluation using principles of "Better Regulation"
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.007
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31133538
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2232098236
Volume 16
WOSCitedRecordID wos000507925300012&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVESC
  databaseName: ScienceDirect Freedom Collection - Elsevier
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1934-8150
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0037014
  issn: 1551-7411
  databaseCode: AIEXJ
  dateStart: 20050301
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com
  providerName: Elsevier
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9NAEF6lLUK9IN4Nj2qpaC-pi73r13ILqAgQqnIIUm6Wsw9o1dpRXrT_ntmXbQFR4cDFsmytbfn7PDsz3vkGodeUJCokSgVxFJNARwwBgwAuEGkupjwSISmVaTaRnZ3lkwkb9XprXwuzvsyqKr--ZrP_CjUcA7B16ew_wN1cFA7APoAOW4Adtn8F_KgjttEUQQ0U4F3_0HmBue0-r_-t26pflxtsdb8Hq4WtUXd5eLPa45CQd6b0BxD55np-HdpiX-_c-lV8OoficvFGCrajz7uWg5kVy25S-V9uKtuOyrUeb6aAWicj7AxQV_X8vJuggGg0bBZ7SGtUGY2DPLICs43VTTvsIl0TanQefjftNstwcbIozXPqVXnMiK7arrkdZGdXBloaQfydWO2YXzS1_akttEOyhIE13Bl-Op189nM4zSBybOu93vzxrrvorr_OJqdmU9BinJfxfXTPRR14aNnyAPVk9RAdjRwSx3jcVuEtjvERHrWC5jeP0PcupbCnFG4ohVtKYUupt3hY4ZZQ2BAKt4TCtcIHlk64pdPBY_T1w-n4_cfAdegIeByRZUAZfNIpgzkhlLlgecTLNM94lGaET8OpEEqUEY9VpBIqU8KUoCIR4GSLhISUS_oEbVd1JfcQ1kJJJTicUSxUHPJ0SjgVcSK5bhggKO-j2L_igjv5et1F5bLw6xQvCgdSoUEqwqQAkPropBk2s_ottw3IPX6Fc0Ktc1kAEW8b-srjXYCR1n_eykrWq0UBPjgJWU5o2kdPLRGap_EcerbxzHO0235XL9D2cr6SL9Edvl6eL-b7aCub5PuOwD8BGXO87A
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Professional+practice+following+regulatory+change%3A+An+evaluation+using+principles+of+%22Better+Regulation%22&rft.jtitle=Research+in+social+and+administrative+pharmacy&rft.au=Lynch%2C+Matthew&rft.au=Kodate%2C+Naonori&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.eissn=1934-8150&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=208&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.sapharm.2019.05.007&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F31133538&rft.externalDocID=31133538
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1551-7411&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1551-7411&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1551-7411&client=summon