Endometrial cancer surveillance adherence reduces utilization and subsequent costs

In June 2011, the SGO recommended that physical exam and symptoms be the primary surveillance methods in patients with endometrial cancer. We sought to evaluate adherence to these guidelines by comparing the use of CT scans, paps and serum CA125 ordered for endometrial cancer surveillance before and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gynecologic oncology Jg. 146; H. 3; S. 514 - 518
Hauptverfasser: Schwartz, Zachary P., Frey, Melissa K., Philips, Sarah, Curtin, John P.
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: United States Elsevier Inc 01.09.2017
Schlagworte:
ISSN:0090-8258, 1095-6859, 1095-6859
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Abstract In June 2011, the SGO recommended that physical exam and symptoms be the primary surveillance methods in patients with endometrial cancer. We sought to evaluate adherence to these guidelines by comparing the use of CT scans, paps and serum CA125 ordered for endometrial cancer surveillance before and after publication of these guidelines. A retrospective review was performed for all patients undergoing surveillance for endometrial cancer at a single institution between June 2009 and June 2013. We assessed the number of patients without symptoms or abnormal physical exam findings who underwent surveillance CT scans, paps and/or CA125 during the 2years pre- and 2years post-SGO guidelines. 92 patients (n=48 pre-6/2011, n=44 post-6/2011) were identified. Mean patient age was 58years. No significant difference in age, ethnicity, body mass index, or disease grade or stage was noted. There was a significant decline in surveillance CT scans (n=13, 27% vs. n=4, 9%, p=0.03), CA125 (n=14, 29% vs. 5, 11%, p=0.035) and paps (n=34, 71% vs. n=8 vs. 18%, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in disease status at the last follow-up. Institutional cost of surveillance also declined ($14,102.46 2years pre-guidelines, $3,054.99 2years post-guidelines). In a single urban academic public hospital, after only 2years, clinical adherence to the 2011 SGO endometrial cancer surveillance guidelines resulted in a significant decline in the use of CT scans, CA125 and paps. This reduction does not appear to affect patient outcomes and led to an appreciable decrease in surveillance costs. •Single institution shows decline in CT's, CA125's, and Paps due to SGO guidelines.•Adherence to SGO guidelines did not negatively impact patient outcomes.•Cost of surveillance care declined secondary to adherence to these SGO guidelines.
AbstractList In June 2011, the SGO recommended that physical exam and symptoms be the primary surveillance methods in patients with endometrial cancer. We sought to evaluate adherence to these guidelines by comparing the use of CT scans, paps and serum CA125 ordered for endometrial cancer surveillance before and after publication of these guidelines. A retrospective review was performed for all patients undergoing surveillance for endometrial cancer at a single institution between June 2009 and June 2013. We assessed the number of patients without symptoms or abnormal physical exam findings who underwent surveillance CT scans, paps and/or CA125 during the 2years pre- and 2years post-SGO guidelines. 92 patients (n=48 pre-6/2011, n=44 post-6/2011) were identified. Mean patient age was 58years. No significant difference in age, ethnicity, body mass index, or disease grade or stage was noted. There was a significant decline in surveillance CT scans (n=13, 27% vs. n=4, 9%, p=0.03), CA125 (n=14, 29% vs. 5, 11%, p=0.035) and paps (n=34, 71% vs. n=8 vs. 18%, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in disease status at the last follow-up. Institutional cost of surveillance also declined ($14,102.46 2years pre-guidelines, $3,054.99 2years post-guidelines). In a single urban academic public hospital, after only 2years, clinical adherence to the 2011 SGO endometrial cancer surveillance guidelines resulted in a significant decline in the use of CT scans, CA125 and paps. This reduction does not appear to affect patient outcomes and led to an appreciable decrease in surveillance costs.
In June 2011, the SGO recommended that physical exam and symptoms be the primary surveillance methods in patients with endometrial cancer. We sought to evaluate adherence to these guidelines by comparing the use of CT scans, paps and serum CA125 ordered for endometrial cancer surveillance before and after publication of these guidelines. A retrospective review was performed for all patients undergoing surveillance for endometrial cancer at a single institution between June 2009 and June 2013. We assessed the number of patients without symptoms or abnormal physical exam findings who underwent surveillance CT scans, paps and/or CA125 during the 2years pre- and 2years post-SGO guidelines. 92 patients (n=48 pre-6/2011, n=44 post-6/2011) were identified. Mean patient age was 58years. No significant difference in age, ethnicity, body mass index, or disease grade or stage was noted. There was a significant decline in surveillance CT scans (n=13, 27% vs. n=4, 9%, p=0.03), CA125 (n=14, 29% vs. 5, 11%, p=0.035) and paps (n=34, 71% vs. n=8 vs. 18%, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in disease status at the last follow-up. Institutional cost of surveillance also declined ($14,102.46 2years pre-guidelines, $3,054.99 2years post-guidelines). In a single urban academic public hospital, after only 2years, clinical adherence to the 2011 SGO endometrial cancer surveillance guidelines resulted in a significant decline in the use of CT scans, CA125 and paps. This reduction does not appear to affect patient outcomes and led to an appreciable decrease in surveillance costs. •Single institution shows decline in CT's, CA125's, and Paps due to SGO guidelines.•Adherence to SGO guidelines did not negatively impact patient outcomes.•Cost of surveillance care declined secondary to adherence to these SGO guidelines.
In June 2011, the SGO recommended that physical exam and symptoms be the primary surveillance methods in patients with endometrial cancer. We sought to evaluate adherence to these guidelines by comparing the use of CT scans, paps and serum CA125 ordered for endometrial cancer surveillance before and after publication of these guidelines.OBJECTIVESIn June 2011, the SGO recommended that physical exam and symptoms be the primary surveillance methods in patients with endometrial cancer. We sought to evaluate adherence to these guidelines by comparing the use of CT scans, paps and serum CA125 ordered for endometrial cancer surveillance before and after publication of these guidelines.A retrospective review was performed for all patients undergoing surveillance for endometrial cancer at a single institution between June 2009 and June 2013. We assessed the number of patients without symptoms or abnormal physical exam findings who underwent surveillance CT scans, paps and/or CA125 during the 2years pre- and 2years post-SGO guidelines.METHODSA retrospective review was performed for all patients undergoing surveillance for endometrial cancer at a single institution between June 2009 and June 2013. We assessed the number of patients without symptoms or abnormal physical exam findings who underwent surveillance CT scans, paps and/or CA125 during the 2years pre- and 2years post-SGO guidelines.92 patients (n=48 pre-6/2011, n=44 post-6/2011) were identified. Mean patient age was 58years. No significant difference in age, ethnicity, body mass index, or disease grade or stage was noted. There was a significant decline in surveillance CT scans (n=13, 27% vs. n=4, 9%, p=0.03), CA125 (n=14, 29% vs. 5, 11%, p=0.035) and paps (n=34, 71% vs. n=8 vs. 18%, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in disease status at the last follow-up. Institutional cost of surveillance also declined ($14,102.46 2years pre-guidelines, $3,054.99 2years post-guidelines).RESULTS92 patients (n=48 pre-6/2011, n=44 post-6/2011) were identified. Mean patient age was 58years. No significant difference in age, ethnicity, body mass index, or disease grade or stage was noted. There was a significant decline in surveillance CT scans (n=13, 27% vs. n=4, 9%, p=0.03), CA125 (n=14, 29% vs. 5, 11%, p=0.035) and paps (n=34, 71% vs. n=8 vs. 18%, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in disease status at the last follow-up. Institutional cost of surveillance also declined ($14,102.46 2years pre-guidelines, $3,054.99 2years post-guidelines).In a single urban academic public hospital, after only 2years, clinical adherence to the 2011 SGO endometrial cancer surveillance guidelines resulted in a significant decline in the use of CT scans, CA125 and paps. This reduction does not appear to affect patient outcomes and led to an appreciable decrease in surveillance costs.CONCLUSIONSIn a single urban academic public hospital, after only 2years, clinical adherence to the 2011 SGO endometrial cancer surveillance guidelines resulted in a significant decline in the use of CT scans, CA125 and paps. This reduction does not appear to affect patient outcomes and led to an appreciable decrease in surveillance costs.
Author Philips, Sarah
Schwartz, Zachary P.
Frey, Melissa K.
Curtin, John P.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Zachary P.
  surname: Schwartz
  fullname: Schwartz, Zachary P.
  email: ZPSchwartz.MD@gmail.com
  organization: New York University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 550 First Ave., NBV 9E2, New York, NY 10016, United States
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Melissa K.
  surname: Frey
  fullname: Frey, Melissa K.
  email: Mkf2002@med.cornell.edu
  organization: Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 525 E. 68th St., Suite J-130, New York, NY 10065, United States
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Sarah
  orcidid: 0000-0003-3197-779X
  surname: Philips
  fullname: Philips, Sarah
  email: SarahRPhilips@gmail.com
  organization: New York University School of Medicine, 550 1st Ave., New York, NY 10016, United States
– sequence: 4
  givenname: John P.
  surname: Curtin
  fullname: Curtin, John P.
  email: John.Curtin@nyumc.org
  organization: New York University School of Medicine, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 550 First Ave., NBV 9E2, New York, NY 10016, United States
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28734496$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkE1r3DAQQEVJaTZpf0Gh-NiL3ZHklWVKDyWkHxAIlOQstKNxq61XSiU5sPn1tbPJJYfkJAneG0nvhB2FGIix9xwaDlx92jb73_sQGwG8a0A1INpXbMWhX9dKr_sjtgLoodZirY_ZSc5bAJDAxRt2LHQn27ZXK_brPLi4o5K8HSu0ASlVeUq35MdxOVXW_aFEyy6Rm5ByNRU_-jtbfAyVDW7GN5n-TRRKhTGX_Ja9HuyY6d3Desquv51fnf2oLy6__zz7elFjy3mptbZaONehFgSDArVBK7HvJa5bsnyDjqtWSZCd7dyAnRZcWuR8QK2p5YM8ZR8Pc29SnK_Pxex8RlreTXHKhvdCclBKtTP64QGdNjty5ib5nU1789hhBvoDgCnmnGgw6Mv9F0uyfjQczNLcbM19c7M0N6DM3Hx25RP3cfzz1peDRXOiW0_JZPRLZ-cTYTEu-hf8z098HH3waMe_tH_R_g-BcrHz
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1097_og9_0000000000000010
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2020_12_024
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bspc_2023_104685
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.05.013
10.1177/030089161109700502
10.1097/AOG.0000000000001293
10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.03.022
10.6004/jnccn.2009.0035
10.1097/IGC.0000000000000797
10.2217/fon.14.192
10.6004/jnccn.2014.0025
10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.02.011
10.1016/j.ajog.2011.03.008
10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181e2abcc
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2017 Elsevier Inc.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2017 Elsevier Inc.
– notice: Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE

MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1095-6859
EndPage 518
ExternalDocumentID 28734496
10_1016_j_ygyno_2017_06_024
S0090825817309654
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.55
.FO
.GJ
.~1
0R~
1B1
1P~
1RT
1~.
1~5
29I
3O-
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
7-5
71M
8P~
9JM
AABNK
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAQXK
AATTM
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABFNM
ABFRF
ABJNI
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIEU
ACLOT
ACRLP
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADFGL
ADMUD
ADNMO
AEBSH
AEFWE
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFFNX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGHFR
AGQPQ
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
CAG
COF
CS3
DM4
DU5
EBS
EFBJH
EFKBS
EFLBG
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
HED
HMK
HMO
HVGLF
HZ~
IH2
IHE
J1W
K-O
KOM
L7B
LG5
M29
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OQ.
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
PH~
Q38
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SCC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SES
SEW
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
T5K
UDS
UHS
UV1
WUQ
X7M
XPP
Z5R
ZGI
ZMT
ZU3
ZXP
~G-
~HD
AACTN
AAIAV
ABLVK
ABYKQ
AFCTW
AFKWA
AHPSJ
AJBFU
AJOXV
AMFUW
LCYCR
RIG
9DU
AAYXX
CITATION
AGCQF
AGRNS
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-88a82dd7c82e0f606bca3c993c54ea1bcd16463037a7dfc78213ac11fc88e41f3
ISICitedReferencesCount 2
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000409158200012&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0090-8258
1095-6859
IngestDate Sat Sep 27 22:12:47 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:59:52 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 04:40:25 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:01:48 EST 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:31:08 EST 2024
Tue Oct 14 19:35:13 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords Adherence
Endometrial cancer
Surveillance
Cost
Outcomes
Cytology
Language English
License Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c411t-88a82dd7c82e0f606bca3c993c54ea1bcd16463037a7dfc78213ac11fc88e41f3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-3197-779X
PMID 28734496
PQID 1923106664
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 5
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1923106664
pubmed_primary_28734496
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ygyno_2017_06_024
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2017_06_024
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ygyno_2017_06_024
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_ygyno_2017_06_024
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate September 2017
2017-09-00
20170901
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2017
  text: September 2017
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Gynecologic oncology
PublicationTitleAlternate Gynecol Oncol
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
References Conner, Andrews, Anderson, Buller (bb0050) 2000; 95
Wright, Tergas, Hou (bb0030) 2016; 127
Rettenmaier, Rettenmaier, Wojciechowski (bb0040) 2011; 79
Leeson, Stuart, Sylvestre, Hall, Whitaker (bb0075) 2013; 3
Koh, Greer, Abu-Rustum (bb0085) 2014; 12
Rose, Sommers, Reale (bb0060) 1994; 84
Salani, Backes, Kee, Fung (bb0065) 2011; 204
American Cancer Society (bb0005) 2017
Society of Gynecologic Oncology (bb0015)
Salani, Khanna, Frimer, Bristow, Chen (bb0070) 2017; 146
Sartori, Pasinetti, Chiudinelli (bb0020) 2010; 20
Bristow, Purinton, Santillan (bb0035) 2006; 103
Fung-Kee-Fung, Dodge, Elit (bb0055) 2006; 101
Lee, Kim, Seo (bb0045) 2016; 26
Fuso, Evangelista, Pagano (bb0025) 2011; 97
Greer, Koh, Abu-Rustum (bb0080) 2009; 7
Sheikh, Althouse, Freese (bb0010) 2014; 10
Fung-Kee-Fung (10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0055) 2006; 101
Rose (10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0060) 1994; 84
Wright (10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0030) 2016; 127
Bristow (10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0035) 2006; 103
Fuso (10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0025) 2011; 97
Salani (10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0065) 2011; 204
Salani (10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0070) 2017; 146
Lee (10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0045) 2016; 26
Society of Gynecologic Oncology (10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0015)
Sartori (10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0020) 2010; 20
Rettenmaier (10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0040) 2011; 79
Conner (10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0050) 2000; 95
Koh (10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0085) 2014; 12
American Cancer Society (10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0005) 2017
Sheikh (10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0010) 2014; 10
Leeson (10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0075) 2013; 3
Greer (10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0080) 2009; 7
References_xml – volume: 10
  start-page: 2561
  year: 2014
  end-page: 2568
  ident: bb0010
  article-title: USA endometrial cancer projections to 2030: should we be concerned?
  publication-title: Future Oncol.
– volume: 84
  start-page: 12
  year: 1994
  end-page: 16
  ident: bb0060
  article-title: Serial serum CA 125 measurments for evaluation of recurrence in patients with endometrial carcinoma
  publication-title: Obstet. Gynecol.
– volume: 103
  start-page: 709
  year: 2006
  end-page: 713
  ident: bb0035
  article-title: Cost-effectiveness of routine vaginal cytology for endometrial cancer surveillance
  publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol.
– volume: 79
  start-page: 262
  year: 2011
  end-page: 268
  ident: bb0040
  article-title: The utility of routine follow-up procedures in the surveillance of uterine cancer: a 20
  publication-title: Oncology
– volume: 101
  start-page: 520
  year: 2006
  end-page: 529
  ident: bb0055
  article-title: Review: follow-up after primary therapy for endometrial cancer: a systemic review
  publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol.
– volume: 12
  start-page: 248
  year: 2014
  end-page: 280
  ident: bb0085
  article-title: Uterine neoplasms, version 1.2014
  publication-title: J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw.
– volume: 3
  year: 2013
  ident: bb0075
  article-title: Gynaecological cancer follow-up: national survey of current practice in the UK
  publication-title: Br. Med. J.
– volume: 146
  start-page: 3
  year: 2017
  end-page: 10
  ident: bb0070
  article-title: An update on post-treatment surveillance and diagnosis of recurrence in women with gynecologic malignancies: Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) recommendations
  publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol.
– year: 2017
  ident: bb0005
  article-title: Cancer Facts and Figures 2017
– volume: 97
  start-page: 551
  year: 2011
  end-page: 558
  ident: bb0025
  article-title: Variation in gynecological oncology follow-up practice: attributable to cancer centers or to patient characteristics? A piedmont regional oncology network study
  publication-title: Tumori
– volume: 95
  start-page: 692
  year: 2000
  end-page: 696
  ident: bb0050
  article-title: Computed tomography in endometrial carcinoma
  publication-title: Obstet. Gynecol.
– volume: 204
  start-page: 466
  year: 2011
  end-page: 478
  ident: bb0065
  article-title: Oncology: posttreatment surveillance and diagnosis of recurrence in women with gynecologic malignancies: society of gynecologic oncologists recommendations
  publication-title: Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.
– volume: 7
  start-page: 498
  year: 2009
  end-page: 531
  ident: bb0080
  article-title: Uterine neoplasms. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology
  publication-title: J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw.
– ident: bb0015
  article-title: Choosing Wisely: Five Things Physicians and Patients Should Question
– volume: 127
  start-page: 449
  year: 2016
  end-page: 458
  ident: bb0030
  article-title: Trends in periodic surveillance testing for early-stage uterine cancer survivors
  publication-title: Obstet. Gynecol.
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1434
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1439
  ident: bb0045
  article-title: Detecting asymptomatic recurrence in early-stage endometrial cancer: the value of vaginal cytology, imaging studies, and CA-125
  publication-title: Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer
– volume: 20
  start-page: 985
  year: 2010
  end-page: 992
  ident: bb0020
  article-title: Surveillance procedures for patients treated for endometrial cancer: a review of the literature
  publication-title: Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer
– volume: 3
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0075
  article-title: Gynaecological cancer follow-up: national survey of current practice in the UK
  publication-title: Br. Med. J.
– volume: 103
  start-page: 709
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0035
  article-title: Cost-effectiveness of routine vaginal cytology for endometrial cancer surveillance
  publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.05.013
– volume: 97
  start-page: 551
  issue: 5
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0025
  article-title: Variation in gynecological oncology follow-up practice: attributable to cancer centers or to patient characteristics? A piedmont regional oncology network study
  publication-title: Tumori
  doi: 10.1177/030089161109700502
– volume: 127
  start-page: 449
  issue: 3
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0030
  article-title: Trends in periodic surveillance testing for early-stage uterine cancer survivors
  publication-title: Obstet. Gynecol.
  doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001293
– volume: 146
  start-page: 3
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0070
  article-title: An update on post-treatment surveillance and diagnosis of recurrence in women with gynecologic malignancies: Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) recommendations
  publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.03.022
– volume: 7
  start-page: 498
  issue: 5
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0080
  article-title: Uterine neoplasms. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology
  publication-title: J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw.
  doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2009.0035
– volume: 84
  start-page: 12
  year: 1994
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0060
  article-title: Serial serum CA 125 measurments for evaluation of recurrence in patients with endometrial carcinoma
  publication-title: Obstet. Gynecol.
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1434
  issue: 8
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0045
  article-title: Detecting asymptomatic recurrence in early-stage endometrial cancer: the value of vaginal cytology, imaging studies, and CA-125
  publication-title: Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer
  doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000797
– ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0015
– volume: 79
  start-page: 262
  issue: 3–4
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0040
  article-title: The utility of routine follow-up procedures in the surveillance of uterine cancer: a 20year institutional review
  publication-title: Oncology
– volume: 95
  start-page: 692
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0050
  article-title: Computed tomography in endometrial carcinoma
  publication-title: Obstet. Gynecol.
– volume: 10
  start-page: 2561
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0010
  article-title: USA endometrial cancer projections to 2030: should we be concerned?
  publication-title: Future Oncol.
  doi: 10.2217/fon.14.192
– volume: 12
  start-page: 248
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0085
  article-title: Uterine neoplasms, version 1.2014
  publication-title: J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw.
  doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2014.0025
– year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0005
– volume: 101
  start-page: 520
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0055
  article-title: Review: follow-up after primary therapy for endometrial cancer: a systemic review
  publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.02.011
– volume: 204
  start-page: 466
  issue: 6
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0065
  article-title: Oncology: posttreatment surveillance and diagnosis of recurrence in women with gynecologic malignancies: society of gynecologic oncologists recommendations
  publication-title: Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.03.008
– volume: 20
  start-page: 985
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024_bb0020
  article-title: Surveillance procedures for patients treated for endometrial cancer: a review of the literature
  publication-title: Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer
  doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181e2abcc
SSID ssj0003012
Score 2.2238195
Snippet In June 2011, the SGO recommended that physical exam and symptoms be the primary surveillance methods in patients with endometrial cancer. We sought to...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 514
SubjectTerms Adherence
Adult
Aged
CA-125 Antigen - blood
Cost
Cytology
Endometrial cancer
Endometrial Neoplasms - diagnosis
Female
Guideline Adherence
Health Care Costs
Humans
Middle Aged
Outcomes
Papanicolaou Test - economics
Papanicolaou Test - utilization
Physical Examination
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Retrospective Studies
Surveillance
Symptom Assessment
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - economics
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - utilization
Watchful Waiting - economics
Watchful Waiting - methods
Watchful Waiting - standards
Title Endometrial cancer surveillance adherence reduces utilization and subsequent costs
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0090825817309654
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28734496
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1923106664
Volume 146
WOSCitedRecordID wos000409158200012&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVESC
  databaseName: Elsevier SD Freedom Collection Journals 2021
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1095-6859
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0003012
  issn: 0090-8258
  databaseCode: AIEXJ
  dateStart: 19950101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com
  providerName: Elsevier
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1ba9swFBZpO0Zfxu5rtxUP9uY5RI4syY-lZFdaytpB2IuRZXltyexiJ1nzT_Zzd3RzUkK7C-zFBNuyZZ0v5xwdnfMJodeJiGXC00Gkl0YjwngZ5WWRRApTwUlBqMDCbDbBjo74eJwe93o_fS3MfMKqil9dpZf_VdRwDoStS2f_QtzdQ-EE_AahwxHEDsc_EvyoKurvyu7GIbVMm7CdNXOltxcy5QHFmaOWbTRtq2pD6MzElWOatYQWlInJsJ6Gsm4t1ZN3YN8tKiWtwgzrSl4Lyp_Isx_QIROS_ip0PdciPO53CGlsdPxQTUDYIvzUXbFBnXYtQH0w8xQHJr_HPcqFKMDs-RwsFzfztTPXUjvBudNF7Ja4va-s-gWHL6LccYR7_exilOer83ejbRNbf-oMd2IV-ZpNsOGJi_7i26LS5Z6YGcbWmCxNYJeYeKJ7pTuFQfOlNCEbaCtmSQr6cmv_w2j8sbPyoBgtE737Cs9oZXIH1151k9dz06zGeDen99E9Ny0J9i2cHqCeqh6iu4cu8eIR-ryCqsCiKlhFVdChKnCoClZQFQCqgiWqAoOqx-jL29HpwfvIbccRSYLxNOJc8LgomOSxGpQw8c2lGErwb2VClMC5LDRXHbhETLCilOB64qGQGJeSc0VwOXyCNqu6Us9QAOqBas8Vc6JIHkshWVKkZTLAgsB8ON9BsR-uTDquer1lyiTzSYkXmRnjTI9xplMzY7KD3nSNLi1Vy-23Ey-HzFchg93MADa3N6NdM-ekWufz9w1feWFnoML1upyoVD1rMzvJopTCPU8tCroPiDkbEpLS3X997XO0vfxLvkCb02amXqI7cj49b5s9tMHGfM9h-xcH6M9u
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Endometrial+cancer+surveillance+adherence+reduces+utilization+and+subsequent+costs&rft.jtitle=Gynecologic+oncology&rft.au=Schwartz%2C+Zachary+P.&rft.au=Frey%2C+Melissa+K.&rft.au=Philips%2C+Sarah&rft.au=Curtin%2C+John+P.&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Inc&rft.issn=0090-8258&rft.eissn=1095-6859&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=514&rft.epage=518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ygyno.2017.06.024&rft.externalDocID=S0090825817309654
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0090-8258&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0090-8258&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0090-8258&client=summon