Measurement error, fixed effects, and false positives in accounting research

We show theoretically and empirically that measurement error can bias in favor of falsely rejecting a true null hypothesis (i.e., a “false positive”) and that regression models with high-dimensional fixed effects can exacerbate measurement error bias and increase the likelihood of false positives. W...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Review of accounting studies Vol. 29; no. 2; pp. 959 - 995
Main Authors: Jennings, Jared, Kim, Jung Min, Lee, Joshua, Taylor, Daniel
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York Springer US 01.06.2024
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
ISSN:1380-6653, 1573-7136
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We show theoretically and empirically that measurement error can bias in favor of falsely rejecting a true null hypothesis (i.e., a “false positive”) and that regression models with high-dimensional fixed effects can exacerbate measurement error bias and increase the likelihood of false positives. We replicate inferences from prior work in a setting where we can directly observe the amount of measurement error and show that the combination of measurement error and fixed effects materially inflates coefficients and distorts inferences. We provide researchers with a simple diagnostic tool to assess the possibility that the combination of measurement error and fixed effects might give rise to a false positive, and encourage researchers to triangulate inferences across multiple empirical proxies and multiple fixed effect structures.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1380-6653
1573-7136
DOI:10.1007/s11142-023-09754-z