Assessing the application of barbed sutures in comparison to conventional sutures for surgical applications: a global systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical animal studies

Following an initiative published by Lancet in 2002 and an IDEAL-D framework, the value of preclinical animal studies has garnered increasing attention in recent research. Numerous preclinical animal experiments tried to generate evidence to guide the development of barbed sutures. However, discerni...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of surgery (London, England) Jg. 110; H. 5; S. 3060 - 3071
Hauptverfasser: Xiang, Nanyan, Lin, Yifei, Su, Xiaoyi, Hu, Zifan, Zhou, Jinyu, Wu, Yi, Du, Liang, Huang, Jin
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: United States Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 01.05.2024
Schlagworte:
ISSN:1743-9159, 1743-9191, 1743-9159
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Abstract Following an initiative published by Lancet in 2002 and an IDEAL-D framework, the value of preclinical animal studies has garnered increasing attention in recent research. Numerous preclinical animal experiments tried to generate evidence to guide the development of barbed sutures. However, discernible drawbacks and incongruities in outcomes have emerged between clinical and preclinical animal studies. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to review the preclinical animal experiments comparing barbed sutures with conventional sutures. The authors hope to facilitate clinical translation of barbed sutures by evaluating effectiveness, safety, and physical properties/reliability. A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted to identify controlled preclinical animal experiments comparing barbed sutures with conventional sutures. The risk of bias was assessed using SYRCLE. GRADE approach was used to evaluate evidence quality. Revman was applied to analyze all the data. Subgroup, sensitivity, and meta-regression analyses were also performed. A total of 62 articles were eligible with low to moderate quality, including 2158 samples from 10 different animal species across 27 surgical procedures. Barbed suture exhibited a significant reduction in suture time, limited change in Cross-Sectional Area (CSA), and decreased instances of tissue disruption (all P <0.05). Subgroup analyses, considering both clinical and research significance, indicated that barbed sutures might cause more specific adverse events and demonstrate suboptimal performance of physical properties/reliability. Meta-regression suggested that heterogeneity resulted from variations in studies and animal models. Although barbed suture demonstrated superiority in numerous surgeries for time efficiency, its safety and physical properties/reliability might be influenced by diverse preclinical models, sutures' brand, surgeries, and anatomical sites. Further evaluation, based on standardized and well-designed animal experiments, is essential for medical device development and applications in human beings.
AbstractList Following an initiative published by Lancet in 2002 and an IDEAL-D framework, the value of preclinical animal studies has garnered increasing attention in recent research. Numerous preclinical animal experiments tried to generate evidence to guide the development of barbed sutures. However, discernible drawbacks and incongruities in outcomes have emerged between clinical and preclinical animal studies. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to review the preclinical animal experiments comparing barbed sutures with conventional sutures. The authors hope to facilitate clinical translation of barbed sutures by evaluating effectiveness, safety, and physical properties/reliability.BACKGROUNDFollowing an initiative published by Lancet in 2002 and an IDEAL-D framework, the value of preclinical animal studies has garnered increasing attention in recent research. Numerous preclinical animal experiments tried to generate evidence to guide the development of barbed sutures. However, discernible drawbacks and incongruities in outcomes have emerged between clinical and preclinical animal studies. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to review the preclinical animal experiments comparing barbed sutures with conventional sutures. The authors hope to facilitate clinical translation of barbed sutures by evaluating effectiveness, safety, and physical properties/reliability.A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted to identify controlled preclinical animal experiments comparing barbed sutures with conventional sutures. The risk of bias was assessed using SYRCLE. GRADE approach was used to evaluate evidence quality. Revman was applied to analyze all the data. Subgroup, sensitivity, and meta-regression analyses were also performed.MATERIALS AND METHODSA systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted to identify controlled preclinical animal experiments comparing barbed sutures with conventional sutures. The risk of bias was assessed using SYRCLE. GRADE approach was used to evaluate evidence quality. Revman was applied to analyze all the data. Subgroup, sensitivity, and meta-regression analyses were also performed.A total of 62 articles were eligible with low to moderate quality, including 2158 samples from 10 different animal species across 27 surgical procedures. Barbed suture exhibited a significant reduction in suture time, limited change in Cross-Sectional Area (CSA), and decreased instances of tissue disruption (all P <0.05). Subgroup analyses, considering both clinical and research significance, indicated that barbed sutures might cause more specific adverse events and demonstrate suboptimal performance of physical properties/reliability. Meta-regression suggested that heterogeneity resulted from variations in studies and animal models.RESULTSA total of 62 articles were eligible with low to moderate quality, including 2158 samples from 10 different animal species across 27 surgical procedures. Barbed suture exhibited a significant reduction in suture time, limited change in Cross-Sectional Area (CSA), and decreased instances of tissue disruption (all P <0.05). Subgroup analyses, considering both clinical and research significance, indicated that barbed sutures might cause more specific adverse events and demonstrate suboptimal performance of physical properties/reliability. Meta-regression suggested that heterogeneity resulted from variations in studies and animal models.Although barbed suture demonstrated superiority in numerous surgeries for time efficiency, its safety and physical properties/reliability might be influenced by diverse preclinical models, sutures' brand, surgeries, and anatomical sites. Further evaluation, based on standardized and well-designed animal experiments, is essential for medical device development and applications in human beings.CONCLUSIONAlthough barbed suture demonstrated superiority in numerous surgeries for time efficiency, its safety and physical properties/reliability might be influenced by diverse preclinical models, sutures' brand, surgeries, and anatomical sites. Further evaluation, based on standardized and well-designed animal experiments, is essential for medical device development and applications in human beings.
Following an initiative published by Lancet in 2002 and an IDEAL-D framework, the value of preclinical animal studies has garnered increasing attention in recent research. Numerous preclinical animal experiments tried to generate evidence to guide the development of barbed sutures. However, discernible drawbacks and incongruities in outcomes have emerged between clinical and preclinical animal studies. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to review the preclinical animal experiments comparing barbed sutures with conventional sutures. The authors hope to facilitate clinical translation of barbed sutures by evaluating effectiveness, safety, and physical properties/reliability. A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted to identify controlled preclinical animal experiments comparing barbed sutures with conventional sutures. The risk of bias was assessed using SYRCLE. GRADE approach was used to evaluate evidence quality. Revman was applied to analyze all the data. Subgroup, sensitivity, and meta-regression analyses were also performed. A total of 62 articles were eligible with low to moderate quality, including 2158 samples from 10 different animal species across 27 surgical procedures. Barbed suture exhibited a significant reduction in suture time, limited change in Cross-Sectional Area (CSA), and decreased instances of tissue disruption (all P <0.05). Subgroup analyses, considering both clinical and research significance, indicated that barbed sutures might cause more specific adverse events and demonstrate suboptimal performance of physical properties/reliability. Meta-regression suggested that heterogeneity resulted from variations in studies and animal models. Although barbed suture demonstrated superiority in numerous surgeries for time efficiency, its safety and physical properties/reliability might be influenced by diverse preclinical models, sutures' brand, surgeries, and anatomical sites. Further evaluation, based on standardized and well-designed animal experiments, is essential for medical device development and applications in human beings.
Author Lin, Yifei
Zhou, Jinyu
Huang, Jin
Su, Xiaoyi
Hu, Zifan
Wu, Yi
Du, Liang
Xiang, Nanyan
AuthorAffiliation f Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
e West China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
a Department of Urology, Innovation Institute for Integration of Medicine and Engineering, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
b Department of Urology, Innovation Institute for Integration of Medicine and Engineering, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
c Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
d Department of Urology, Innovation Institute for Integration of Medicine and Engineering, Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center,West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: f Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
– name: c Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
– name: d Department of Urology, Innovation Institute for Integration of Medicine and Engineering, Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center,West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
– name: b Department of Urology, Innovation Institute for Integration of Medicine and Engineering, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
– name: e West China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
– name: a Department of Urology, Innovation Institute for Integration of Medicine and Engineering, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Nanyan
  surname: Xiang
  fullname: Xiang, Nanyan
  organization: Department of Urology, Innovation Institute for Integration of Medicine and Engineering, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Yifei
  surname: Lin
  fullname: Lin, Yifei
  organization: Department of Urology, Innovation Institute for Integration of Medicine and Engineering, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China, Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Xiaoyi
  surname: Su
  fullname: Su, Xiaoyi
  organization: Department of Urology, Innovation Institute for Integration of Medicine and Engineering, Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center,West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Zifan
  surname: Hu
  fullname: Hu, Zifan
  organization: West China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Jinyu
  surname: Zhou
  fullname: Zhou, Jinyu
  organization: West China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Yi
  surname: Wu
  fullname: Wu, Yi
  organization: Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Liang
  surname: Du
  fullname: Du, Liang
  organization: Department of Urology, Innovation Institute for Integration of Medicine and Engineering, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Jin
  orcidid: 0000-0001-7160-2314
  surname: Huang
  fullname: Huang, Jin
  organization: Department of Urology, Innovation Institute for Integration of Medicine and Engineering, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38445518$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9Uktv1DAQtlARfcA_QMhHLil2nDhJL6iqeKoSB-BsOc5ka-TYweNstb-Mv4fDltXSA_bBY8_3GGvmnJz44IGQl5xdctY1bz5_7S7Z0eKlYE_IGW8qUXS87k6O4lNyjviDsYq1vH1GTkVbVXXN2zPy6xoREK3f0HQHVM-zs0YnGzwNI-117GGguKQlAlLrqQnTrKPFnE8h3_wW_IrW7oAaQ8xx3GQddyyIV1TTjQv9it1hgik_Gxpha-Geaj_QCZIudNbaocXVf45gnPV7JW-nlZmWwQI-J09H7RBePJwX5Pv7d99uPha3Xz58urm-LUzFulTIrmJl3lxDJU3ZmpoP0Oim7EU3lCBkXdasGUEy0Q_NAOVYj0ayVmrJQNZcXJC3e9156ScYTP5t1E7NMRcTdypoq_7NeHunNmGreG6SqESTFV4_KMTwcwFMarJowDntISyoyk60ZdsxuZq9OjY7uPxtVwZUe4CJATHCeIBwptapUHkq1OOpyLSrRzRj05-e5JKt-z_5N_ODwWo
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_2147_MDER_S508169
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.urology.2018.02.027
10.1007/s11695-019-03744-4
10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.04.009
10.1016/j.arthro.2003.11.014
10.1177/01410768221100970
10.1177/1120700020911891
10.1308/rcsann.2019.0106
10.1038/srep23425
10.1007/s10195-014-0333-8
10.1007/s10029-019-01941-9
10.3390/polym8040147
10.5435/JAAOS-20-07-459
10.1242/dmm.030783
10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00872.x
10.1177/1753193413487470
10.1177/01410768221093551
10.1097/PRS.0000000000002573
10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.008
10.1038/s41598-022-07862-5
10.1016/0363-5023(93)90246-Y
10.1308/003588410X12699663905113
10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.09.030
10.1016/j.jisako.2022.03.004
10.1097/00000658-198308000-00019
10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09812-4
10.1002/jor.24135
10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32428-4
10.2106/00004623-199907000-00010
10.17219/acem/92172
10.1016/j.otorri.2020.02.010
10.1093/asj/sju012
10.1097/MS9.0000000000000407
10.5021/ad.2019.31.6.645
10.3889/oamjms.2019.713
10.1136/bmj.j4008
10.1053/j.jfas.2022.03.010
10.1097/MD.0000000000019945
10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.12043.x
10.1111/vsu.13160
10.1186/s12894-018-0435-3
10.1097/GOX.0000000000000203
10.5051/jpis.2013.43.3.130
10.1111/jebm.12391
10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906
10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182268c1f
10.1002/jbm.b.35074
10.14245/ns.2346534.267
10.1097/SLA.0000000000004907
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026
10.1111/ases.12169
10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70573-9
10.1016/j.jmig.2019.04.005
10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
10.1016/j.molimm.2014.10.023
10.1177/0300985813485099
10.1186/s13037-017-0132-2
10.1183/13993003.02438-2021
10.1111/jebm.12324
10.1007/s00167-021-06708-3
10.1016/0002-9610(75)90408-0
10.1186/1471-2288-14-43
10.1111/vsu.12576
10.1016/j.jmig.2013.09.014
10.1007/s00464-015-4620-0
10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ef8fa3
10.1016/j.kjms.2016.12.005
10.1002/jbm.b.33171
10.1016/j.arth.2018.11.014
10.1186/s13018-020-02141-3
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2024
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
– notice: Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2024
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001230
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1743-9159
EndPage 3071
ExternalDocumentID PMC11093437
38445518
10_1097_JS9_0000000000001230
Genre Meta-Analysis
Comparative Study
Systematic Review
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.FO
.~1
0R~
1B1
1P~
1~.
1~5
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5VS
7-5
71M
8P~
9DU
AAAAV
AABNK
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAHPQ
AAIKJ
AAIQE
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AASCR
AAWTL
AAXUO
AAYWO
AAYXX
ABASU
ABBQC
ABDIG
ABJNI
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABVCZ
ABWVN
ABXDB
ABZZY
ACBKD
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACILI
ACLOT
ACRLP
ACRPL
ACVFH
ACXJB
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADGGA
ADHPY
ADKSD
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADPDF
ADVLN
AEBSH
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFBFQ
AFDTB
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHQNM
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIKHN
AINUH
AITUG
AJCLO
AJNWD
AJRQY
AJUYK
AJZMW
AKBMS
AKCTQ
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALKUP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMJPA
AMKUR
AMNEI
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
AOHHW
AOQMC
AXJTR
BKOJK
BLXMC
CITATION
CS3
DIWNM
EBS
EEVPB
EFJIC
EFLBG
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FCALG
FDB
FEDTE
FIRID
FNPLU
G-Q
GBLVA
GNXGY
GQDEL
HLJTE
HVGLF
HX~
HZ~
IHE
IKREB
IXB
J1W
KOM
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OK-
OK1
OVD
OVDNE
OW-
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
ROL
RPZ
SDF
SDG
SEL
SES
SPCBC
SSZ
T5K
TEORI
TSPGW
Z5R
~G-
~HD
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-694020201ae46c28c51de7a72b39d2e3652507fe603bd7de2f5fc6086a60e6513
ISICitedReferencesCount 4
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001223156300072&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1743-9159
1743-9191
IngestDate Tue Nov 04 02:06:02 EST 2025
Sat Nov 01 15:03:18 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 28 04:41:03 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 07:36:01 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 21:09:54 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Language English
License Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c409t-694020201ae46c28c51de7a72b39d2e3652507fe603bd7de2f5fc6086a60e6513
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ORCID 0000-0001-7160-2314
OpenAccessLink https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11093437
PMID 38445518
PQID 2938289061
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 12
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11093437
proquest_miscellaneous_2938289061
pubmed_primary_38445518
crossref_primary_10_1097_JS9_0000000000001230
crossref_citationtrail_10_1097_JS9_0000000000001230
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-05-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-05-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-05-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: Hagerstown, MD
PublicationTitle International journal of surgery (London, England)
PublicationTitleAlternate Int J Surg
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Publisher_xml – name: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
References Lin (R29-20250825) 2017; 33
Sandercock (R12-20250825) 2002; 360
Chae (R67-20250825) 2018; 36
Kilkenny (R84-20250825) 2010; 160
Lee (R7-20250825) 2022; 12
Shin (R11-20250825) 2016; 138
Guyatt (R27-20250825) 2011; 64
Li (R6-20250825) 2020; 2
Kim (R44-20250825) 2020; 27
Lin (R3-20250825) 2019; 29
Gelberman (R61-20250825) 1999; 81
Walters (R77-20250825) 2013; 110
Chu (R79-20250825) 1983; 198
Silfverskiöld (R62-20250825) 1993; 18
Bennett (R52-20250825) 1997; 11
Nasser (R85-20250825) 2020; 13
Parvaresh (R31-20250825) 2022; 7
Marcus (R13-20250825) 2022; 275
Carrasco Llatas (R33-20250825) 2021; 72
Ritskes-Hoitinga (R16-20250825) 2022; 115
Hooijmans (R25-20250825) 2014; 14
van Steensel (R51-20250825) 2020; 24
Diduch (R68-20250825) 2012; 20
Kundra (R81-20250825) 2010; 92
Rivero-Santana (R4-20250825) 2021; 294
Duffy (R64-20250825) 2019; 48
Naleway (R56-20250825) 2015; 103
Farré (R14-20250825) 2022; 59
Lin (R30-20250825) 2019; 19
Huang (R21-20250825) 2022; 110
Vanhees (R63-20250825) 2013; 38
Spotnitz (R66-20250825) 1997; 77
Hurwitz (R35-20250825) 2013; 33
Joyce (R60-20250825) 2014; 39
Muhar (R54-20250825) 2019; 7
Perleberg (R75-20250825) 2018; 11
Kitano (R80-20250825) 2023; 11
Tian (R83-20250825) 1994; 60
Nayak (R10-20250825) 2015; 40
Oor (R42-20250825) 2015; 8
Ohdaira (R74-20250825) 2023; 85
Yalcin (R48-20250825) 2018; 116
Shea (R18-20250825) 2017; 358
Nambi Gowri (R71-20250825) 2023; 10
Sundaram (R39-20250825) 2021; 31
Gibson-Corley (R55-20250825) 2013; 50
Kim (R50-20250825) 2019; 31
Egger (R26-20250825) 1997; 315
Khiste (R69-20250825) 2013; 43
Clemente (R58-20250825) 2015; 16
Lin (R2-20250825) 2016; 6
Aspden (R34-20250825) 2004
Shermak (R9-20250825) 2010; 126
Page (R17-20250825) 2021; 88
Thacker (R23-20250825) 1975; 130
Surnmerfield (R76-20250825) 2015; 66
Petrut (R47-20250825) 2013; 86
Cortez (R70-20250825) 2015; 35
Abellán (R20-20250825) 2016; 8
Lakra (R32-20250825) 2019; 34
Karacan (R46-20250825) 2019; 28
Lock (R53-20250825) 2017; 11
Fernandez (R37-20250825) 2016; 30
Peinemann (R65-20250825) 2019; 12
Wiggins (R40-20250825) 2020; 102
Chen (R78-20250825) 2020; 15
Xu (R72-20250825) 2021; 29
Mun (R8-20250825) 2023; 20
Javed (R49-20250825) 2012; 2012
Murphy (R73-20250825) 2023; 62
Viera (R19-20250825) 2005; 37
Spah (R41-20250825) 2013; 42
Joyce (R59-20250825) 2014; 2
Tulandi (R5-20250825) 2014; 21
Ritskes-Hoitinga (R15-20250825) 2022; 115
Li (R38-20250825) 2020; 99
Law (R45-20250825) 2017; 46
McClellan (R57-20250825) 2011; 128
Nutt (R43-20250825) 2017; 58
Moya (R36-20250825) 2013; 33
Meyer (R82-20250825) 2004; 20
References_xml – volume: 116
  start-page: 231.e1
  year: 2018
  ident: R48-20250825
  article-title: In vivo comparison of “V-Loc 90 wound closure device” with “Vicryl” and “Monocryl” in regard to tissue reaction in a rabbit bladder model
  publication-title: Urology
  doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.02.027
– volume: 37
  start-page: 360
  year: 2005
  ident: R19-20250825
  article-title: Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic
  publication-title: Fam Med
– volume: 29
  start-page: 1756
  year: 2019
  ident: R3-20250825
  article-title: The effectiveness and safety of barbed sutures in the bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Obes Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03744-4
– volume: 40
  start-page: 1355
  year: 2015
  ident: R10-20250825
  article-title: A mechanical evaluation of zone II flexor tendon repair using a knotless barbed suture versus a traditional braided suture
  publication-title: J Hand Surg Am
  doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.04.009
– volume: 58
  start-page: 1281
  year: 2017
  ident: R43-20250825
  article-title: Comparison of surgical time and complication rate of subcutaneous and skin closure using barbed suture or traditional knotted suture in dogs
  publication-title: Can Vet J
– volume: 20
  start-page: 185
  year: 2004
  ident: R82-20250825
  article-title: Influence of test temperature and test speed on the mechanical strength of absorbable suture anchors
  publication-title: Arthroscopy
  doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.11.014
– volume: 115
  start-page: 231
  year: 2022
  ident: R16-20250825
  article-title: The role of systematic reviews in identifying the limitations of preclinical animal research, 2000-2022: part 2
  publication-title: J R Soc Med
  doi: 10.1177/01410768221100970
– volume: 33
  start-page: 44s
  issue: 3 Suppl
  year: 2013
  ident: R35-20250825
  article-title: Quill barbed sutures in body contouring surgery: a 6-year comparison with running absorbable braided sutures
  publication-title: Aesthet Surg J
– volume: 31
  start-page: 582
  year: 2021
  ident: R39-20250825
  article-title: Barbed sutures reduce arthrotomy closure duration and suture utilisation compared to interrupted conventional sutures for primary total hip arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial
  publication-title: Hip Int
  doi: 10.1177/1120700020911891
– volume: 102
  start-page: 153
  year: 2020
  ident: R40-20250825
  article-title: Benefits of barbed suture utilisation in gastrointestinal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Ann R Coll Surg Engl
  doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0106
– volume: 6
  start-page: 23425
  year: 2016
  ident: R2-20250825
  article-title: The efficacy and safety of knotless barbed sutures in the surgical field: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
  publication-title: Sci Rep
  doi: 10.1038/srep23425
– volume: 16
  start-page: 251
  year: 2015
  ident: R58-20250825
  article-title: Barbed suture vs conventional tenorrhaphy: biomechanical analysis in an animal model
  publication-title: J Orthop Traumatol
  doi: 10.1007/s10195-014-0333-8
– volume: 24
  start-page: 67
  year: 2020
  ident: R51-20250825
  article-title: Prevention of incisional hernia using different suture materials for closing the abdominal wall: a comparison of PDS, Vicryl and Prolene in a rat model
  publication-title: J Hernias Abdominal Wall Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01941-9
– volume: 8
  start-page: 147
  year: 2016
  ident: R20-20250825
  article-title: Physical and mechanical evaluation of five suture materials on three knot configurations: an in vitro study
  publication-title: Polymers
  doi: 10.3390/polym8040147
– volume: 20
  start-page: 459
  year: 2012
  ident: R68-20250825
  article-title: Tissue anchor use in arthroscopic glenohumeral surgery
  publication-title: J Am Acad Orthop Surg
  doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-20-07-459
– volume: 11
  start-page: dmm030783
  year: 2018
  ident: R75-20250825
  article-title: Genetically engineered pigs as models for human disease
  publication-title: Dis Model Mech
  doi: 10.1242/dmm.030783
– volume: 160
  start-page: 1577
  year: 2010
  ident: R84-20250825
  article-title: Animal research: reporting in vivo experiments: the ARRIVE guidelines
  publication-title: Br J Pharmacol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00872.x
– volume: 39
  start-page: 40
  year: 2014
  ident: R60-20250825
  article-title: Flexor tendon repair: a comparative study between a knotless barbed suture repair and a traditional four-strand monofilament suture repair
  publication-title: J Hand Surg Eur Vol
  doi: 10.1177/1753193413487470
– volume: 115
  start-page: 186
  year: 2022
  ident: R15-20250825
  article-title: The role of systematic reviews in identifying the limitations of preclinical animal research, 2000-2022: part 1
  publication-title: J R Soc Med
  doi: 10.1177/01410768221093551
– volume: 138
  start-page: 666e
  year: 2016
  ident: R11-20250825
  article-title: Biomechanical analysis of barbed suture in flexor tendon repair versus conventional method: systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
  doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002573
– volume: 294
  start-page: 391
  year: 2021
  ident: R4-20250825
  article-title: Stepped care for the treatment of depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: J Affect Disord
  doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.008
– volume: 12
  start-page: 3942
  year: 2022
  ident: R7-20250825
  article-title: A comparison of barbed continuous suture versus conventional interrupted suture for fascial closure in total hip arthroplasty
  publication-title: Sci Rep
  doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07862-5
– year: 2004
  ident: R34-20250825
  article-title: Institute of Medicine Committee on Data Standards for Patient, Safety. Patient Safety: Achieving a New Standard for Care. Washington (DC):
  publication-title: National Academies Press (US)
– volume: 18
  start-page: 58
  year: 1993
  ident: R62-20250825
  article-title: Two new methods of tendon repair: an in vitro evaluation of tensile strength and gap formation
  publication-title: J Hand Surg [Am]
  doi: 10.1016/0363-5023(93)90246-Y
– volume: 92
  start-page: 665
  year: 2010
  ident: R81-20250825
  article-title: Absorbable or non-absorbable sutures? A prospective, randomised evaluation of aesthetic outcomes in patients undergoing elective day-case hand and wrist surgery
  publication-title: Ann R Coll Surg Engl
  doi: 10.1308/003588410X12699663905113
– volume: 38
  start-page: 56
  year: 2013
  ident: R63-20250825
  article-title: The effect of suture preloading on the force to failure and gap formation after flexor tendon repair
  publication-title: J Hand Surg [Am]
  doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.09.030
– volume: 7
  start-page: 84
  year: 2022
  ident: R31-20250825
  article-title: Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis using the knotless lasso technique
  publication-title: J ISAKOS
  doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2022.03.004
– volume: 86
  start-page: 371
  year: 2013
  ident: R47-20250825
  article-title: In-vivo assessment of barbed suturing thread with regard to tissue reaction and material absorption in a rat model
  publication-title: Clujul Med (1957)
– volume: 198
  start-page: 223
  year: 1983
  ident: R79-20250825
  article-title: An in vitro evaluation of the stability of mechanical properties of surgical suture materials in various pH conditions
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/00000658-198308000-00019
– volume: 360
  start-page: 586
  year: 2002
  ident: R12-20250825
  article-title: Systematic reviews of animal experiments
  publication-title: Lancet (London, England)
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09812-4
– volume: 36
  start-page: 3318
  year: 2018
  ident: R67-20250825
  article-title: Effect of structural design on the pullout strength of suture anchors for rotator cuff repair
  publication-title: J Orthop Res
  doi: 10.1002/jor.24135
– volume: 2
  start-page: 8
  year: 2020
  ident: R6-20250825
  article-title: A comparison between barbed suture and conventional suture in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Arthroplasty (London, England)
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32428-4
– volume: 81
  start-page: 975
  year: 1999
  ident: R61-20250825
  article-title: The effect of gap formation at the repair site on the strength and excursion of intrasynovial flexor tendons. An experimental study on the early stages of tendon-healing in dogs
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am
  doi: 10.2106/00004623-199907000-00010
– volume: 28
  start-page: 643
  year: 2019
  ident: R46-20250825
  article-title: Do barbed sutures with different surface textures have different effects on adhesion formation and histological features? An experimental blinded study in an animal model
  publication-title: Adv Clin Experiment Med
  doi: 10.17219/acem/92172
– volume: 72
  start-page: 152
  year: 2021
  ident: R33-20250825
  article-title: Modified reposition pharyngoplasty for OSAS treatment: how we do it and our results
  publication-title: Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp
  doi: 10.1016/j.otorri.2020.02.010
– volume: 33
  start-page: 57s
  issue: 3 Suppl
  year: 2013
  ident: R36-20250825
  article-title: Barbed sutures in body surgery
  publication-title: Aesthet Surg J
– volume: 35
  start-page: 178
  year: 2015
  ident: R70-20250825
  article-title: Barbed sutures and wound complications in plastic surgery: an analysis of outcomes
  publication-title: Aesthet Surg J
  doi: 10.1093/asj/sju012
– volume: 85
  start-page: 1403
  year: 2023
  ident: R74-20250825
  article-title: A technique for esophagojejunostomy following robot-assisted gastrectomy: a liner stapler and barbed suture device-based technique: a case series
  publication-title: Ann Med Surg
  doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000407
– volume: 31
  start-page: 645
  year: 2019
  ident: R50-20250825
  article-title: Experimental investigation on the tissue response induced by face-lifting mesh suspension thread in rats
  publication-title: Ann Dermatol
  doi: 10.5021/ad.2019.31.6.645
– volume: 7
  start-page: 3937
  year: 2019
  ident: R54-20250825
  article-title: Hypoxia-mesenchymal stem cells inhibit intra-peritoneal adhesions formation by upregulation of the IL-10 expression
  publication-title: Open Access Maced J Med Sci
  doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.713
– volume: 358
  start-page: j4008
  year: 2017
  ident: R18-20250825
  article-title: AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
  publication-title: BMJ (Clinical research ed)
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4008
– volume: 62
  start-page: 45
  year: 2023
  ident: R73-20250825
  article-title: Biomechanical comparison of knotless suture anchor versus percutaneous end-to-end technique for mid-substance achilles tendon rupture repair
  publication-title: J Foot Ankle Surg
  doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2022.03.010
– volume: 99
  start-page: e19945
  year: 2020
  ident: R38-20250825
  article-title: Barbed suture versus traditional suture in primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
  publication-title: Medicine
  doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019945
– volume: 10
  start-page: 419
  year: 2023
  ident: R71-20250825
  article-title: A review of barbed sutures-evolution, applications and clinical significance
  publication-title: Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)
– volume: 42
  start-page: 932
  year: 2013
  ident: R41-20250825
  article-title: Evaluation of two novel self-anchoring barbed sutures in a prophylactic laparoscopic gastropexy compared with intracorporeal tied knots
  publication-title: Vet Surg
  doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.12043.x
– volume: 48
  start-page: 424
  year: 2019
  ident: R64-20250825
  article-title: Comparison of initial leak pressures after single- and double-layer cystotomy closure with barbed and nonbarbed monofilament suture material in an ex vivo ovine model
  publication-title: Vet Surg
  doi: 10.1111/vsu.13160
– volume: 19
  start-page: 5
  year: 2019
  ident: R30-20250825
  article-title: The application of barbed suture during the partial nephrectomy may modify perioperative results: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: BMC Urol
  doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0435-3
– volume: 2
  start-page: e237
  year: 2014
  ident: R59-20250825
  article-title: A barbed suture repair for flexor tendons: a novel technique with no exposed barbs
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
  doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000203
– volume: 43
  start-page: 130
  year: 2013
  ident: R69-20250825
  article-title: Evaluation of tensile strength of surgical synthetic absorbable suture materials: an in vitro study
  publication-title: J Periodontal Implant Sci
  doi: 10.5051/jpis.2013.43.3.130
– volume: 110
  start-page: 212
  year: 2013
  ident: R77-20250825
  article-title: Advancing swine models for human health and diseases
  publication-title: Mo Med
– volume: 13
  start-page: 153
  year: 2020
  ident: R85-20250825
  article-title: Designing clinical trials for future space missions as a pathway to changing how clinical trials are conducted on Earth
  publication-title: J Evid-Based Med
  doi: 10.1111/jebm.12391
– volume: 88
  start-page: 105906
  year: 2021
  ident: R17-20250825
  article-title: The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
  publication-title: Int J Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906
– volume: 128
  start-page: 322e
  year: 2011
  ident: R57-20250825
  article-title: A knotless flexor tendon repair technique using a bidirectional barbed suture: an ex vivo comparison of three methods
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
  doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182268c1f
– volume: 110
  start-page: 2258
  year: 2022
  ident: R21-20250825
  article-title: Comparison of the mechanical properties and anchoring performance of polyvinylidene fluoride and polypropylene barbed sutures for tendon repair
  publication-title: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater
  doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.35074
– volume: 20
  start-page: 981
  year: 2023
  ident: R8-20250825
  article-title: Surgical and clinical outcomes associated with the use of barbed sutures and self-adhering mesh system and polymeric glue for wound closure in multilevel or revision spinal surgery: a matched cohort comparative study with conventional wound closure procedure
  publication-title: Neurospine
  doi: 10.14245/ns.2346534.267
– volume: 275
  start-page: 73
  year: 2022
  ident: R13-20250825
  article-title: IDEAL-D framework for device innovation: a consensus statement on the preclinical stage
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004907
– volume: 64
  start-page: 383
  year: 2011
  ident: R27-20250825
  article-title: GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
  publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026
– volume: 8
  start-page: 209
  year: 2015
  ident: R42-20250825
  article-title: V-loc™ capable of grasping surrounding tissue causes obstruction at the jejunojejunostomy after Roux-en-Y laparoscopic gastric bypass
  publication-title: Asian J Endoscopic Surg
  doi: 10.1111/ases.12169
– volume: 77
  start-page: 651
  year: 1997
  ident: R66-20250825
  article-title: The role of sutures and fibrin sealant in wound healing
  publication-title: Surg Clin North Am
  doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70573-9
– volume: 27
  start-page: 473
  year: 2020
  ident: R44-20250825
  article-title: In vivo comparison of MONOFIX, a novel barbed suture with a triangular stopper, with pre-existing products in a porcine model
  publication-title: J Minim Invasive Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.04.005
– volume: 315
  start-page: 629
  year: 1997
  ident: R26-20250825
  article-title: Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
– volume: 66
  start-page: 14
  year: 2015
  ident: R76-20250825
  article-title: The immunology of the porcine skin and its value as a model for human skin
  publication-title: Mol Immunol
  doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2014.10.023
– volume: 50
  start-page: 1007
  year: 2013
  ident: R55-20250825
  article-title: Principles for valid histopathologic scoring in research
  publication-title: Vet Pathol
  doi: 10.1177/0300985813485099
– volume: 11
  start-page: 175
  year: 1997
  ident: R52-20250825
  article-title: Histologic evaluation of the tissue reaction to five suture materials in the body wall of rock doves (Columba livia)
  publication-title: J Avian Med Surg
– volume: 11
  start-page: 16
  year: 2017
  ident: R53-20250825
  article-title: Induction of immune gene expression and inflammatory mediator release by commonly used surgical suture materials: an experimental in vitro study
  publication-title: Patient Saf Surg
  doi: 10.1186/s13037-017-0132-2
– volume: 60
  start-page: 287
  year: 1994
  ident: R83-20250825
  article-title: The disintegration of absorbable suture materials on exposure to human digestive juices: an update
  publication-title: Am Surg
– volume: 11
  start-page: e4742
  year: 2023
  ident: R80-20250825
  article-title: Absorbable barbed continuous versus nonabsorbable nonbarbed interrupted suturing methods for donor-site closure of the rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap
  publication-title: Plastic Reconstruct Surg
– volume: 59
  start-page: 2102438
  year: 2022
  ident: R14-20250825
  article-title: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in animal model research: as necessary, and with similar pros and cons, as in patient research
  publication-title: Eur Respir J
  doi: 10.1183/13993003.02438-2021
– volume: 12
  start-page: 125
  year: 2019
  ident: R65-20250825
  article-title: Negative pressure wound therapy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials from 2000 to 2017
  publication-title: J Evid-based Med
  doi: 10.1111/jebm.12324
– volume: 29
  start-page: 3997
  year: 2021
  ident: R72-20250825
  article-title: Modified double-pulley suture-bridge techniques with or without medial knot tying show comparable clinical and radiological outcomes in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
  publication-title: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
  doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06708-3
– volume: 130
  start-page: 374
  year: 1975
  ident: R23-20250825
  article-title: Mechanical performance of surgical sutures
  publication-title: Am J Surg
  doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(75)90408-0
– volume: 14
  start-page: 43
  year: 2014
  ident: R25-20250825
  article-title: SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies
  publication-title: BMC Med Res Methodol
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-43
– volume: 46
  start-page: 59
  year: 2017
  ident: R45-20250825
  article-title: Biomechanical testing and histologic examination of intradermal skin closure in dogs using barbed suture device and non-barbed monofilament suture
  publication-title: Veterinary Surg
  doi: 10.1111/vsu.12576
– volume: 21
  start-page: 210
  year: 2014
  ident: R5-20250825
  article-title: The use of barbed suture for laparoscopic hysterectomy and myomectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: J Minim Invasive Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.09.014
– volume: 30
  start-page: 3630
  year: 2016
  ident: R37-20250825
  article-title: Knotless choledochorraphy with barbed suture, safe and feasible
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4620-0
– volume: 126
  start-page: 1735
  year: 2010
  ident: R9-20250825
  article-title: Barbed suture impact on wound closure in body contouring surgery
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
  doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ef8fa3
– volume: 33
  start-page: 107
  year: 2017
  ident: R29-20250825
  article-title: Efficacy and safety of barbed suture in minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Kaohsiung J Med Sci
  doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2016.12.005
– volume: 2012
  start-page: 762095
  year: 2012
  ident: R49-20250825
  article-title: Tissue reactions to various suture materials used in oral surgical interventions
  publication-title: ISRN Dent
– volume: 103
  start-page: 735
  year: 2015
  ident: R56-20250825
  article-title: Mechanical properties of suture materials in general and cutaneous surgery
  publication-title: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater
  doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.33171
– volume: 34
  start-page: 483
  year: 2019
  ident: R32-20250825
  article-title: The learning curve by operative time for soft tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty using electronic sensor technology
  publication-title: J Arthroplasty
  doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.11.014
– volume: 15
  start-page: 599
  year: 2020
  ident: R78-20250825
  article-title: Injury mechanism affects the stability of suture-button syndesmosis fixation
  publication-title: J Orthop Surg
  doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02141-3
SSID ssj0040818
Score 2.3710592
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet Following an initiative published by Lancet in 2002 and an IDEAL-D framework, the value of preclinical animal studies has garnered increasing attention in...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 3060
SubjectTerms Animals
Reviews
Suture Techniques - instrumentation
Sutures
Title Assessing the application of barbed sutures in comparison to conventional sutures for surgical applications: a global systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical animal studies
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38445518
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2938289061
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11093437
Volume 110
WOSCitedRecordID wos001223156300072&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVESC
  databaseName: ScienceDirect database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1743-9159
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0040818
  issn: 1743-9159
  databaseCode: AIEXJ
  dateStart: 20200201
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com
  providerName: Elsevier
– providerCode: PRVESC
  databaseName: ScienceDirect database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1743-9159
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0040818
  issn: 1743-9159
  databaseCode: AIEXJ
  dateStart: 20211001
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com
  providerName: Elsevier
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1ba9swFBZNO0ZfxsZu2aVosFdvji1LVt9K6dgKK4V1kD0F2ZaYS-KEOCntL9vf25ElWUoW2AWWBxMUyXY4n6Sjo-98QugtdP-ioIxFpEh4RBTJoc9lKhKZqlI1Kpmyh02wi4t8POaXe4NjlwtzM2VNk9_e8sV_NTWUgbF16uxfmLu_KRTAdzA6XMHscP0jw5ttXJcFFWxQa7-wEMsCXMy2UxLpqLClP4gQ3NANErqrpZmI7Xppxshwx9tkSltNkW1NaEM1nsmViESgfLKAIdZlY4qmnnX5Kp7LeO2Z9T5QGchbtCaNe-dJJEFUY1zbODjMHncB7cgoJnyrlaz9dpguggbzu9qDvNu0qZVtasMiCfEkRBMW2SFv0YVF6qnmHgUjPuvoB-bIsHcyLLNS5W6asPTbOtyJ7wZ9WHXFgQMBo-Zo5-RkRI_Pv3Ajmmk_4DrEYXUw3WLWYTPNCdGCeX6q7gmUl59PtVRsSlI2QAcJyziM6Acnn87G584PIVqs0KQDmz_oEkc5e7_rHQ7RfffATR_tl4XXNn84cMiuHqIHdiWFT0wPeIT2ZPMY_ejRjwH9OAArnits0I8trnHdYI9-vJrjEP19LUA_dugPb9geY4EN9rHHPjbYxwBHvIF9_fwA-9hgH1vsP0FfP5xdnX6M7NkkUUlivooo14EX8J6FJLRM8jIbVZIJlhQprxKZUk0XYErSOC0qVslEZaqkcU4FjSXNRulTtN_MG_kcYVYJlQpKC5ZIUoxikXAYISVJBVc8ZmyIUmeNSWmF-_X5MdOJI5CAOSfb5hyiqG-1MMI1v6n_xhl6AjOM3jYUjZyv2wksCHRYBhz_IXpmDN_f0SFmiPINSPQVtHr95i9N_b1TsXf4ffHvTV-iQ9_1X6H91XItX6N75c2qbpdHaMDG-ZHtFT8Be3YdBw
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing+the+application+of+barbed+sutures+in+comparison+to+conventional+sutures+for+surgical+applications%3A+a+global+systematic+review+and+meta-analysis+of+preclinical+animal+studies&rft.jtitle=International+journal+of+surgery+%28London%2C+England%29&rft.au=Xiang%2C+Nanyan&rft.au=Lin%2C+Yifei&rft.au=Su%2C+Xiaoyi&rft.au=Hu%2C+Zifan&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.pub=Lippincott+Williams+%26+Wilkins&rft.issn=1743-9191&rft.eissn=1743-9159&rft.volume=110&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=3060&rft.epage=3071&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FJS9.0000000000001230&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F38445518&rft.externalDocID=PMC11093437
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1743-9159&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1743-9159&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1743-9159&client=summon