Clinical and radiological results of final fusion in patients who underwent lengthening with magnetically controlled growing rods. About 66 patients with a mean follow-up of 5 years

Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of definitive arthrodesis on frontal and sagittal spine balance in EOS patients treated with MCGR, as well as the complications associated with this procedure and the outcome at last follow-up. Methods This was a multicentre study in 10 Frenc...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:European spine journal Ročník 32; číslo 9; s. 3118 - 3132
Hlavní autoři: Mainard, Nicolas, Saghbini, Elie, Langlais, Tristan, Vialle, Raphael, Nectoux, Eric, Sales de Gauzy, Jerome, Fron, Damien, Canavese, Federico
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.09.2023
Springer Nature B.V
Springer Verlag
Edice:European Spine Journal
Témata:
ISSN:0940-6719, 1432-0932, 1432-0932
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of definitive arthrodesis on frontal and sagittal spine balance in EOS patients treated with MCGR, as well as the complications associated with this procedure and the outcome at last follow-up. Methods This was a multicentre study in 10 French centres. All patients who underwent posterior spinal arthrodesis after completion of MCGR treatment, regardless of age, etiology of scoliosis between 2011 and 2022, were included. Results A total of 66 patients who had a final fusion after the lengthening programme were included in the study. The mean follow-up time was 5.5 ± 1.7 years (range: 2.1–9). The mean follow-up time after arthrodesis was 24 ± 18 months (range: 3–68) and the mean age at arthrodesis was 13.5 ± 1.5 years (range: 9.5–17). The main and secondary curves were significantly ( p  < 0.005 and p  = 0.03) improved by arthrodesis (16.4° and 9° respectively) and stabilised at the last follow-up. The T1-T12 and T1-S1 distances increased by 8.4 mm and 14 mm with spinal fusion, with no significant difference ( p  = 0.096 and p  = 0.068). There was no significant improvement in the rest of the parameters with arthrodesis, nor was there any significant deterioration at last follow-up. After final fusion, there were a total of 24 complications in 18 patients (27.3%) that routinely led to repeat surgery. Conclusion Final fusion after MCGR provides satisfactory additional correction of the main and secondary curves and a moderate increase in the T1-T12 distance but has no impact on sagittal balance and other radiological parameters. The post-operative complication rate is particularly high in patients at risk of complications. Level of evidence Level 4.
AbstractList The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of definitive arthrodesis on frontal and sagittal spine balance in EOS patients treated with MCGR, as well as the complications associated with this procedure and the outcome at last follow-up.PURPOSEThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of definitive arthrodesis on frontal and sagittal spine balance in EOS patients treated with MCGR, as well as the complications associated with this procedure and the outcome at last follow-up.This was a multicentre study in 10 French centres. All patients who underwent posterior spinal arthrodesis after completion of MCGR treatment, regardless of age, etiology of scoliosis between 2011 and 2022, were included.METHODSThis was a multicentre study in 10 French centres. All patients who underwent posterior spinal arthrodesis after completion of MCGR treatment, regardless of age, etiology of scoliosis between 2011 and 2022, were included.A total of 66 patients who had a final fusion after the lengthening programme were included in the study. The mean follow-up time was 5.5 ± 1.7 years (range: 2.1-9). The mean follow-up time after arthrodesis was 24 ± 18 months (range: 3-68) and the mean age at arthrodesis was 13.5 ± 1.5 years (range: 9.5-17). The main and secondary curves were significantly (p < 0.005 and p = 0.03) improved by arthrodesis (16.4° and 9° respectively) and stabilised at the last follow-up. The T1-T12 and T1-S1 distances increased by 8.4 mm and 14 mm with spinal fusion, with no significant difference (p = 0.096 and p = 0.068). There was no significant improvement in the rest of the parameters with arthrodesis, nor was there any significant deterioration at last follow-up. After final fusion, there were a total of 24 complications in 18 patients (27.3%) that routinely led to repeat surgery.RESULTSA total of 66 patients who had a final fusion after the lengthening programme were included in the study. The mean follow-up time was 5.5 ± 1.7 years (range: 2.1-9). The mean follow-up time after arthrodesis was 24 ± 18 months (range: 3-68) and the mean age at arthrodesis was 13.5 ± 1.5 years (range: 9.5-17). The main and secondary curves were significantly (p < 0.005 and p = 0.03) improved by arthrodesis (16.4° and 9° respectively) and stabilised at the last follow-up. The T1-T12 and T1-S1 distances increased by 8.4 mm and 14 mm with spinal fusion, with no significant difference (p = 0.096 and p = 0.068). There was no significant improvement in the rest of the parameters with arthrodesis, nor was there any significant deterioration at last follow-up. After final fusion, there were a total of 24 complications in 18 patients (27.3%) that routinely led to repeat surgery.Final fusion after MCGR provides satisfactory additional correction of the main and secondary curves and a moderate increase in the T1-T12 distance but has no impact on sagittal balance and other radiological parameters. The post-operative complication rate is particularly high in patients at risk of complications.CONCLUSIONFinal fusion after MCGR provides satisfactory additional correction of the main and secondary curves and a moderate increase in the T1-T12 distance but has no impact on sagittal balance and other radiological parameters. The post-operative complication rate is particularly high in patients at risk of complications.Level 4.LEVEL OF EVIDENCELevel 4.
PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of definitive arthrodesis on frontal and sagittal spine balance in EOS patients treated with MCGR, as well as the complications associated with this procedure and the outcome at last follow-up.MethodsThis was a multicentre study in 10 French centres. All patients who underwent posterior spinal arthrodesis after completion of MCGR treatment, regardless of age, etiology of scoliosis between 2011 and 2022, were included.ResultsA total of 66 patients who had a final fusion after the lengthening programme were included in the study. The mean follow-up time was 5.5 ± 1.7 years (range: 2.1–9). The mean follow-up time after arthrodesis was 24 ± 18 months (range: 3–68) and the mean age at arthrodesis was 13.5 ± 1.5 years (range: 9.5–17). The main and secondary curves were significantly (p < 0.005 and p = 0.03) improved by arthrodesis (16.4° and 9° respectively) and stabilised at the last follow-up. The T1-T12 and T1-S1 distances increased by 8.4 mm and 14 mm with spinal fusion, with no significant difference (p = 0.096 and p = 0.068). There was no significant improvement in the rest of the parameters with arthrodesis, nor was there any significant deterioration at last follow-up.After final fusion, there were a total of 24 complications in 18 patients (27.3%) that routinely led to repeat surgery. ConclusionFinal fusion after MCGR provides satisfactory additional correction of the main and secondary curves and a moderate increase in the T1-T12 distance but has no impact on sagittal balance and other radiological parameters. The post-operative complication rate is particularly high in patients at risk of complications.Level of evidence Level 4.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of definitive arthrodesis on frontal and sagittal spine balance in EOS patients treated with MCGR, as well as the complications associated with this procedure and the outcome at last follow-up. This was a multicentre study in 10 French centres. All patients who underwent posterior spinal arthrodesis after completion of MCGR treatment, regardless of age, etiology of scoliosis between 2011 and 2022, were included. A total of 66 patients who had a final fusion after the lengthening programme were included in the study. The mean follow-up time was 5.5 ± 1.7 years (range: 2.1-9). The mean follow-up time after arthrodesis was 24 ± 18 months (range: 3-68) and the mean age at arthrodesis was 13.5 ± 1.5 years (range: 9.5-17). The main and secondary curves were significantly (p < 0.005 and p = 0.03) improved by arthrodesis (16.4° and 9° respectively) and stabilised at the last follow-up. The T1-T12 and T1-S1 distances increased by 8.4 mm and 14 mm with spinal fusion, with no significant difference (p = 0.096 and p = 0.068). There was no significant improvement in the rest of the parameters with arthrodesis, nor was there any significant deterioration at last follow-up. After final fusion, there were a total of 24 complications in 18 patients (27.3%) that routinely led to repeat surgery. Final fusion after MCGR provides satisfactory additional correction of the main and secondary curves and a moderate increase in the T1-T12 distance but has no impact on sagittal balance and other radiological parameters. The post-operative complication rate is particularly high in patients at risk of complications. Level 4.
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of definitive arthrodesis on frontal and sagittal spine balance in EOS patients treated with MCGR, as well as the complications associated with this procedure and the outcome at last follow-up. Methods This was a multicentre study in 10 French centres. All patients who underwent posterior spinal arthrodesis after completion of MCGR treatment, regardless of age, etiology of scoliosis between 2011 and 2022, were included. Results A total of 66 patients who had a final fusion after the lengthening programme were included in the study. The mean follow-up time was 5.5 ± 1.7 years (range: 2.1–9). The mean follow-up time after arthrodesis was 24 ± 18 months (range: 3–68) and the mean age at arthrodesis was 13.5 ± 1.5 years (range: 9.5–17). The main and secondary curves were significantly ( p  < 0.005 and p  = 0.03) improved by arthrodesis (16.4° and 9° respectively) and stabilised at the last follow-up. The T1-T12 and T1-S1 distances increased by 8.4 mm and 14 mm with spinal fusion, with no significant difference ( p  = 0.096 and p  = 0.068). There was no significant improvement in the rest of the parameters with arthrodesis, nor was there any significant deterioration at last follow-up. After final fusion, there were a total of 24 complications in 18 patients (27.3%) that routinely led to repeat surgery. Conclusion Final fusion after MCGR provides satisfactory additional correction of the main and secondary curves and a moderate increase in the T1-T12 distance but has no impact on sagittal balance and other radiological parameters. The post-operative complication rate is particularly high in patients at risk of complications. Level of evidence Level 4.
PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of definitive arthrodesis on frontal and sagittal spine balance in EOS patients treated with MCGR, as well as the complications associated with this procedure and the outcome at last follow-up.MethodsThis was a multicentre study in 10 French centres. All patients who underwent posterior spinal arthrodesis after completion of MCGR treatment, regardless of age, etiology of scoliosis between 2011 and 2022, were included.ResultsA total of 66 patients who had a final fusion after the lengthening programme were included in the study. The mean follow-up time was 5.5 ± 1.7 years (range: 2.1–9). The mean follow-up time after arthrodesis was 24 ± 18 months (range: 3–68) and the mean age at arthrodesis was 13.5 ± 1.5 years (range: 9.5–17). The main and secondary curves were significantly (p < 0.005 and p = 0.03) improved by arthrodesis (16.4° and 9° respectively) and stabilised at the last follow-up. The T1-T12 and T1-S1 distances increased by 8.4 mm and 14 mm with spinal fusion, with no significant difference (p = 0.096 and p = 0.068). There was no significant improvement in the rest of the parameters with arthrodesis, nor was there any significant deterioration at last follow-up.After final fusion, there were a total of 24 complications in 18 patients (27.3%) that routinely led to repeat surgery.ConclusionFinal fusion after MCGR provides satisfactory additional correction of the main and secondary curves and a moderate increase in the T1-T12 distance but has no impact on sagittal balance and other radiological parameters. The post-operative complication rate is particularly high in patients at risk of complications.Level of evidenceLevel 4.
Author Nectoux, Eric
Sales de Gauzy, Jerome
Vialle, Raphael
Canavese, Federico
Mainard, Nicolas
Fron, Damien
Langlais, Tristan
Saghbini, Elie
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Nicolas
  orcidid: 0000-0001-6403-2448
  surname: Mainard
  fullname: Mainard, Nicolas
  email: nicolas.mainard@orange.fr
  organization: Department of Pediatric Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, CHU Lille, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Elie
  surname: Saghbini
  fullname: Saghbini, Elie
  organization: Orthopaedic and Reconstructive Surgery in Children, Hôpital Armand-Trousseau - AP-HP
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Tristan
  surname: Langlais
  fullname: Langlais, Tristan
  organization: Paediatrics - Orthopaedic, Traumatological and Plastic Surgery, Children’s Hospital
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Raphael
  surname: Vialle
  fullname: Vialle, Raphael
  organization: Orthopaedic and Reconstructive Surgery in Children, Hôpital Armand-Trousseau - AP-HP
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Eric
  surname: Nectoux
  fullname: Nectoux, Eric
  organization: Department of Pediatric Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, CHU Lille, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lille Henri Warembourg, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Jerome
  surname: Sales de Gauzy
  fullname: Sales de Gauzy, Jerome
  organization: Paediatrics - Orthopaedic, Traumatological and Plastic Surgery, Children’s Hospital
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Damien
  surname: Fron
  fullname: Fron, Damien
  organization: Department of Pediatric Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, CHU Lille, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Federico
  surname: Canavese
  fullname: Canavese, Federico
  organization: Department of Pediatric Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, CHU Lille, Paediatrics - Orthopaedic, Traumatological and Plastic Surgery, Children’s Hospital
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37382696$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://hal.univ-lille.fr/hal-04536354$$DView record in HAL
BookMark eNp9ks9u1DAQxi1URLeFF-CALHGBQ4r_xUmOqxVQpJW4wNmaTSZZV157sRO2fZs-BQ_Ak-F0W0A99GR5_Ps-j76ZM3Lig0dCXnN2wRmrPiTGyloXTMiCVbVUxfUzsuBKioI1UpyQBWsUK3TFm1NyltIVY7xsmH5BTmUla6EbvSC_Vs5624Kj4DsaobPBheGuEDFNbkw09LS3Phf6KdngqfV0D6NFn98O20An32E85Ct16Idxi976gR7suKU7GDyOs5u7oW3wYwzOYUeHGA4zFEOXLuhyE6aRav2f7SwGukPwtM-ScCim_dxI-fv2BiGml-R5Dy7hq_vznHz_9PHb6rJYf_38ZbVcF61izViohrW6rDea53h6aEqpNhvomaqhqUGrCrFHhYBca647JTiWggmEkgPnSshz8v7ouwVn9tHuIN6YANZcLtdmrjFVSi1L9ZNn9t2R3cfwY8I0mp1NLToHHsOUjKglF01V69n27SP0KkwxZzxTWugyz6nO1Jt7atrssPv7_8P0MlAfgTaGlCL2prVjznAOGqwznJl5UcxxUUxeFHO3KOY6S8Uj6YP7kyJ5FKUM-wHjv7afUP0Bi2TTIg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s00264_024_06121_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_otsr_2024_104012
crossref_primary_10_1007_s43390_025_01139_3
Cites_doi 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004044
10.1097/BRS.0000000000003048
10.1007/s11420-019-09671-5
10.31616/asj.2018.0272
10.1007/s43390-020-00077-6
10.1302/0301-620X.99B12.BJJ-2017-0402.R2
10.52312/jdrs.2021.49
10.1097/BPO.0000000000001646
10.1097/BRS.0000000000001561
10.1007/s00586-018-5590-4
10.2106/JBJS.15.01334
10.1016/j.jspd.2017.10.005
10.2106/JBJS.L.01386
10.1177/21925682221090926
10.1007/s43390-020-00255-6
10.1016/j.jspd.2014.09.050
10.1007/s00402-020-03518-z
10.1177/2192568220948475
10.1302/0301-620X.104B2.BJJ-2021-1198.R1
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182773560
10.1097/BRS.0b013e318240ff67
10.1016/j.jspd.2016.08.007
10.1007/s00586-021-06968-0
10.1093/neuros/nyy270
10.1097/BRS.0000000000002297
10.2106/JBJS.17.00031
10.1097/BRS.0000000000003439
10.1007/s40258-014-0127-4
10.1097/BPB.0000000000000446
10.1007/s00586-021-06750-2
10.1097/BRS.0b013e318214d78f
10.1097/BRS.0000000000003148
10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8b4e
10.2106/JBJS.15.01241
10.1302/0301-620X.99B6.BJJ-2016-1102.R2
10.1007/s00586-016-4929-y
10.1097/BPO.0000000000000597
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e21b50
10.1016/j.spinee.2014.01.046
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
licence_http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
– notice: 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
– notice: licence_http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
3V.
7QP
7X7
7XB
88E
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
BENPR
CCPQU
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
M0S
M1P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
7X8
1XC
DOI 10.1007/s00586-023-07834-x
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
PML(ProQuest Medical Library)
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic (retired)
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
MEDLINE - Academic
Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest One Academic
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
PubMed


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central Collection
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1432-0932
EndPage 3132
ExternalDocumentID oai:HAL:hal-04536354v1
37382696
10_1007_s00586_023_07834_x
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-53
-5E
-5G
-BR
-EM
-Y2
-~C
.86
.VR
06C
06D
0R~
0VY
1N0
1SB
2.D
203
28-
29G
29~
2J2
2JN
2JY
2KG
2KM
2LR
2P1
2VQ
2WC
2~H
30V
36B
3V.
4.4
406
408
409
40D
40E
53G
5GY
5QI
5VS
67Z
6NX
6PF
7X7
88E
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8TC
8UJ
95-
95.
95~
96X
AAAVM
AABHQ
AACDK
AAHNG
AAIAL
AAJBT
AAJKR
AANXM
AANZL
AARHV
AARTL
AASML
AATNV
AATVU
AAUYE
AAWCG
AAWTL
AAYIU
AAYQN
AAYTO
AAYZH
ABAKF
ABBBX
ABBXA
ABDZT
ABECU
ABFTV
ABHLI
ABHQN
ABIPD
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABKCH
ABKTR
ABMNI
ABMQK
ABNWP
ABPLI
ABQBU
ABQSL
ABSXP
ABTEG
ABTKH
ABTMW
ABULA
ABUWG
ABUWZ
ABWNU
ABXPI
ACAOD
ACBXY
ACDTI
ACGFS
ACHSB
ACHVE
ACHXU
ACKNC
ACMDZ
ACMLO
ACOKC
ACOMO
ACPIV
ACPRK
ACSNA
ACUDM
ACZOJ
ADBBV
ADHHG
ADHIR
ADIMF
ADINQ
ADJJI
ADKNI
ADKPE
ADRFC
ADTPH
ADURQ
ADYFF
ADZKW
AEBTG
AEFIE
AEFQL
AEGAL
AEGNC
AEJHL
AEJRE
AEKMD
AEMSY
AENEX
AEOHA
AEPYU
AESKC
AETLH
AEVLU
AEXYK
AFBBN
AFEXP
AFKRA
AFLOW
AFQWF
AFWTZ
AFZKB
AGAYW
AGDGC
AGGDS
AGJBK
AGMZJ
AGQEE
AGQMX
AGRTI
AGWIL
AGWZB
AGYKE
AHAVH
AHBYD
AHIZS
AHKAY
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHYZX
AIAKS
AIGIU
AIIXL
AILAN
AITGF
AJBLW
AJRNO
AJZVZ
AKMHD
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALWAN
AMKLP
AMXSW
AMYLF
AMYQR
AOCGG
AOIJS
ARMRJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXYYD
AZFZN
B-.
BA0
BAWUL
BBWZM
BDATZ
BENPR
BGNMA
BPHCQ
BSONS
BVXVI
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CS3
CSCUP
DDRTE
DIK
DL5
DNIVK
DPUIP
DU5
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EIOEI
EJD
EMB
EMOBN
EN4
ESBYG
F5P
FEDTE
FERAY
FFXSO
FIGPU
FINBP
FNLPD
FRRFC
FSGXE
FWDCC
FYUFA
G-Y
G-Z
GGCAI
GGRSB
GJIRD
GNWQR
GQ6
GQ7
GQ8
GRRUI
GX1
GXS
H13
HF~
HG5
HG6
HMCUK
HMJXF
HQYDN
HRMNR
HVGLF
HYE
HZ~
I09
IHE
IJ-
IKXTQ
IMOTQ
ITM
IWAJR
IXC
IZIGR
IZQ
I~X
I~Z
J-C
J0Z
JBSCW
JCJTX
JZLTJ
KDC
KOV
KOW
KPH
LAS
LLZTM
M1P
M4Y
MA-
N2Q
N9A
NB0
NDZJH
NPVJJ
NQJWS
NU0
O9-
O93
O9G
O9I
O9J
OAM
OK1
P19
P2P
P9S
PF0
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PT4
PT5
Q2X
QOK
QOR
QOS
R4E
R89
R9I
RHV
RIG
RNI
ROL
RPM
RPX
RRX
RSV
RZK
S16
S1Z
S26
S27
S28
S37
S3B
SAP
SCLPG
SDE
SDH
SDM
SHX
SISQX
SJYHP
SMD
SNE
SNPRN
SNX
SOHCF
SOJ
SPISZ
SRMVM
SSLCW
SSXJD
STPWE
SV3
SZ9
SZN
T13
T16
TR2
TSG
TSK
TSV
TT1
TUC
U2A
U9L
UG4
UKHRP
UOJIU
UTJUX
UZXMN
VC2
VFIZW
W23
W48
WJK
WK8
YLTOR
Z45
Z7U
Z7X
Z82
Z83
Z87
Z8O
Z8V
Z8W
Z91
Z92
ZMTXR
ZOVNA
~EX
AAPKM
AAYXX
ABBRH
ABDBE
ABFSG
ABRTQ
ACSTC
ADHKG
AEZWR
AFDZB
AFFHD
AFHIU
AFOHR
AGQPQ
AHPBZ
AHWEU
AIXLP
ATHPR
AYFIA
CITATION
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PPXIY
NPM
7QP
7XB
8FK
K9.
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
7X8
PUEGO
1XC
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-490c658b61834fa9534bbaf048a98a647eefe4eae16616d421e5202ea51a11423
IEDL.DBID RSV
ISICitedReferencesCount 3
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001017765400001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0940-6719
1432-0932
IngestDate Fri Nov 21 06:30:58 EST 2025
Thu Oct 02 11:47:17 EDT 2025
Tue Dec 02 16:03:00 EST 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:22:59 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 04:14:30 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:44:12 EST 2025
Fri Feb 21 02:41:51 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 9
Keywords Early onset scoliosis
Spinal growth
Magnetically controlled growing rod
Graduate
Posterior spinal fusion
Language English
License 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
licence_http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c409t-490c658b61834fa9534bbaf048a98a647eefe4eae16616d421e5202ea51a11423
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0001-6403-2448
PMID 37382696
PQID 2862655908
PQPubID 31317
PageCount 15
ParticipantIDs hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04536354v1
proquest_miscellaneous_2831297862
proquest_journals_2862655908
pubmed_primary_37382696
crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s00586_023_07834_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00586_023_07834_x
springer_journals_10_1007_s00586_023_07834_x
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-09-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-09-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Berlin/Heidelberg
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Berlin/Heidelberg
– name: Germany
– name: Heidelberg
PublicationSeriesTitle European Spine Journal
PublicationTitle European spine journal
PublicationTitleAbbrev Eur Spine J
PublicationTitleAlternate Eur Spine J
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Springer Nature B.V
Springer Verlag
Publisher_xml – name: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
– name: Springer Nature B.V
– name: Springer Verlag
References Cheung, Samartzis, Cheung (CR5) 2014; 14
Murphy, Emans, Troy, Miller, Hresko, Karlin (CR33) 2018; 27
Kwan, Alanay, Yazici, Demirkiran, Helenius, Nnadi (CR24) 2017; 42
Akbarnia, Cheung, Noordeen, Elsebaie, Yazici, Dannawi (CR3) 2013; 38
Akbarnia, Pawelek, Cheung, Demirkiran, Elsebaie, Emans (CR4) 2014; 2
Cheung, Yiu, Kwan, Cheung (CR14) 2019; 84
Akbarnia, Mundis, Salari, Yaszay, Pawelek (CR2) 2012; 37
Kılıçaslan, Tokgöz, Bütün, Nabi, Akalın (CR16) 2021; 32
Sawyer, de Mendonça, Flynn, Samdani, El-Hawary, Spurway (CR29) 2016; 4
Lebel, Rocos, Helenius, Sigal, Struder, Yazici (CR18) 2021; 46
Hanna, Sharafinski, Patterson, Noonan, Sund, Schultz (CR7) 2020; 8
Thakar, Kieser, Mardare, Haleem, Fairbank, Nnadi (CR22) 2018; 27
Sankar, Skaggs, Yazici, Johnston, Shah, Javidan (CR38) 2011; 36
Cheung, Bow, Cheung (CR39) 2022; 12
Hosseini, Pawelek, Mundis, Yaszay, Ferguson, Helenius (CR21) 2016; 41
Hardesty, Murphy, Pawelek, Glotzbecker, Hosseini, Johnston (CR12) 2021; 9
Flynn, Tomlinson, Pawelek, Thompson, McCarthy, Akbarnia (CR6) 2013; 95
Rushton, Siddique, Crawford, Birch, Gibson, Hutton (CR25) 2017; 99-B
La Rosa, Oggiano, Ruzzini (CR20) 2017; 37
Joyce, Smith, Kandemir, Rushton, Fender, Bowey (CR27) 2020; 45
Rushton, Smith, Fender, Bowey, Gibson, Joyce (CR28) 2021; 30
Jain, Sponseller, Flynn, Shah, Thompson, Emans (CR8) 2016; 98
Bouthors, Gaume, Glorion, Miladi (CR30) 2019; 44
Lampe, Schulze Bövingloh, Gosheger, Schulte, Lange (CR15) 2019; 44
Kocyigit, Olgun, Demirkiran, Ayvaz, Yazici (CR36) 2017; 99
Lebon, Batailler, Wargny, Choufani, Violas, Fron (CR17) 2017; 26
Obid, Yiu, Cheung, Kwan, Ruf, Cheung (CR19) 2021; 141
Jenks, Craig, Higgins, Willits, Barata, Wood (CR1) 2014; 12
Poe-Kochert, Shannon, Pawelek, Thompson, Hardesty, Marks (CR34) 2016; 98
Ahmad, Subramanian, Panteliadis, Wilson-Macdonald, Rothenfluh, Nnadi (CR37) 2017; 99-B
Wu, Cheung, Cheung, Lin, Jin, Chen (CR23) 2019; 13
Cahill, Marvil, Cuddihy, Schutt, Idema, Clements (CR11) 2010; 35
Akbarnia, Breakwell, Marks, McCarthy, Thompson, Canale (CR31) 2008; 33
Cobanoglu, Yorgova, Neiss, Pawelek, Thompson, Skaggs (CR9) 2021; 30
Pizones, Martín-Buitrago, Sánchez Márquez, Fernández-Baíllo, Baldan-Martin, Sánchez Pérez-Grueso (CR10) 2018; 6
Tahir, Mehta, Sandhu, Jones, Gardner, Mehta (CR13) 2022; 104-B
Ahuja, Ifthekar, Mittal, Bali, Yadav, Goyal (CR26) 2022
Murphy, Barfield, Emans, Akbarnia, Thompson, Sponseller (CR32) 2020; 40
Shen, Schairer, Widmann (CR35) 2019; 15
IA Kocyigit (7834_CR36) 2017; 99
G La Rosa (7834_CR20) 2017; 37
P Hosseini (7834_CR21) 2016; 41
M Cobanoglu (7834_CR9) 2021; 30
BA Akbarnia (7834_CR3) 2013; 38
M Jenks (7834_CR1) 2014; 12
WN Sankar (7834_CR38) 2011; 36
JP-Y Cheung (7834_CR5) 2014; 14
C Poe-Kochert (7834_CR34) 2016; 98
JPY Cheung (7834_CR14) 2019; 84
TS Shen (7834_CR35) 2019; 15
RF Murphy (7834_CR33) 2018; 27
C Bouthors (7834_CR30) 2019; 44
PRP Rushton (7834_CR25) 2017; 99-B
BA Akbarnia (7834_CR2) 2012; 37
BA Akbarnia (7834_CR4) 2014; 2
J Lebon (7834_CR17) 2017; 26
TJ Joyce (7834_CR27) 2020; 45
RF Murphy (7834_CR32) 2020; 40
P Obid (7834_CR19) 2021; 141
LP Lampe (7834_CR15) 2019; 44
ÖF Kılıçaslan (7834_CR16) 2021; 32
A-M Wu (7834_CR23) 2019; 13
CK Hardesty (7834_CR12) 2021; 9
K Ahuja (7834_CR26) 2022
JM Flynn (7834_CR6) 2013; 95
R Hanna (7834_CR7) 2020; 8
C Thakar (7834_CR22) 2018; 27
A Ahmad (7834_CR37) 2017; 99-B
BA Akbarnia (7834_CR31) 2008; 33
J Pizones (7834_CR10) 2018; 6
PJ Cahill (7834_CR11) 2010; 35
DE Lebel (7834_CR18) 2021; 46
M Tahir (7834_CR13) 2022; 104-B
KYH Kwan (7834_CR24) 2017; 42
JR Sawyer (7834_CR29) 2016; 4
A Jain (7834_CR8) 2016; 98
JPY Cheung (7834_CR39) 2022; 12
PRP Rushton (7834_CR28) 2021; 30
References_xml – volume: 46
  start-page: E1105
  year: 2021
  end-page: 1112
  ident: CR18
  article-title: Magnetically controlled growing rods graduation: deformity control with high complication rate
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004044
– volume: 44
  start-page: 1201
  year: 2019
  end-page: 1210
  ident: CR15
  article-title: Magnetically controlled growing rods in treatment of early-onset scoliosis: a single center study with a minimum of 2-year-follow up and preliminary results after converting surgery
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003048
– volume: 15
  start-page: 201
  year: 2019
  end-page: 204
  ident: CR35
  article-title: In patients with early-onset scoliosis, can growing rods be removed without further instrumentation? an evidenced-based review
  publication-title: HSS J
  doi: 10.1007/s11420-019-09671-5
– volume: 13
  start-page: 682
  year: 2019
  end-page: 693
  ident: CR23
  article-title: Minimum 2-year experience with magnetically controlled growing rods for the treatment of early-onset scoliosis: a systematic review
  publication-title: Asian Spine J
  doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.0272
– volume: 8
  start-page: 547
  year: 2020
  end-page: 552
  ident: CR7
  article-title: Is prophylactic formal fusion with implant revision necessary in non-ambulatory children with spinal muscular atrophy and growing rods who are no longer lengthened?
  publication-title: Spine Deform
  doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00077-6
– volume: 99-B
  start-page: 1658
  year: 2017
  end-page: 1664
  ident: CR37
  article-title: Quantifying the law of diminishing returns in magnetically controlled growing rods
  publication-title: Bone Jt J.
  doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B12.BJJ-2017-0402.R2
– volume: 32
  start-page: 478
  year: 2021
  end-page: 488
  ident: CR16
  article-title: Management and results of early-onset scoliosis with dual magnetically controlled growing rods: additional preliminary results of spinal fusion surgery
  publication-title: Jt Dis Relat Surg.
  doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2021.49
– volume: 40
  start-page: e942
  year: 2020
  end-page: e946
  ident: CR32
  article-title: Minimum 5-year follow-up on graduates of growing spine surgery for early onset scoliosis
  publication-title: J Pediatr Orthop
  doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001646
– volume: 41
  start-page: 1456
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1462
  ident: CR21
  article-title: Magnetically controlled growing rods for early-onset scoliosis: a multicenter study of 23 cases with minimum 2 years follow-up
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001561
– volume: 27
  start-page: 2062
  year: 2018
  end-page: 2071
  ident: CR22
  article-title: Systematic review of the complications associated with magnetically controlled growing rods for the treatment of early onset scoliosis
  publication-title: Eur Spine J
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5590-4
– volume: 98
  start-page: 1913
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1917
  ident: CR34
  article-title: Final fusion after growing-rod treatment for early onset scoliosis: is it really final?
  publication-title: J Bone Jt Surg Am
  doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01334
– volume: 6
  start-page: 308
  year: 2018
  end-page: 313
  ident: CR10
  article-title: Decision making of graduation in patients with early-onset scoliosis at the end of distraction-based programs: risks and benefits of definitive fusion
  publication-title: Spine Deform
  doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2017.10.005
– volume: 95
  start-page: 1745
  year: 2013
  end-page: 1750
  ident: CR6
  article-title: Growing-rod graduates: lessons learned from ninety-nine patients who completed lengthening
  publication-title: J Bone Jt Surg Am
  doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01386
– year: 2022
  ident: CR26
  article-title: Is final fusion necessary for growing-rod graduates: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Glob Spine J
  doi: 10.1177/21925682221090926
– volume: 9
  start-page: 679
  year: 2021
  end-page: 683
  ident: CR12
  article-title: An initial effort to define an early onset scoliosis graduate-the pediatric spine study group experience
  publication-title: Spine Deform
  doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00255-6
– volume: 2
  start-page: 493
  year: 2014
  end-page: 497
  ident: CR4
  article-title: Traditional growing rods versus magnetically controlled growing rods for the surgical treatment of early-onset scoliosis: a case-matched 2-year study
  publication-title: Spine Deform
  doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2014.09.050
– volume: 141
  start-page: 1163
  year: 2021
  end-page: 1174
  ident: CR19
  article-title: Magnetically controlled growing rods in early onset scoliosis: radiological results, outcome, and complications in a series of 22 patients
  publication-title: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03518-z
– volume: 12
  start-page: 221
  year: 2022
  end-page: 228
  ident: CR39
  article-title: Law of temporary diminishing distraction gains: the phenomenon of temporary diminished distraction lengths with magnetically controlled growing rods that is reverted with rod exchange
  publication-title: Glob Spine J
  doi: 10.1177/2192568220948475
– volume: 104-B
  start-page: 264
  issue: 257
  year: 2022
  ident: CR13
  article-title: A comparison of the post-fusion outcome of patients with early-onset scoliosis treated with traditional and magnetically controlled growing rods
  publication-title: Bone Jt J
  doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B2.BJJ-2021-1198.R1
– volume: 38
  start-page: 665
  year: 2013
  end-page: 670
  ident: CR3
  article-title: Next generation of growth-sparing techniques: preliminary clinical results of a magnetically controlled growing rod in 14 patients with early-onset scoliosis
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182773560
– volume: 37
  start-page: 1109
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1114
  ident: CR2
  article-title: Innovation in growing rod technique: a study of safety and efficacy of a magnetically controlled growing rod in a porcine model
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318240ff67
– volume: 4
  start-page: 407
  year: 2016
  end-page: 412
  ident: CR29
  article-title: Complications and radiographic outcomes of posterior spinal fusion and observation in patients who have undergone distraction-based treatment for early onset scoliosis
  publication-title: Spine Deform
  doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2016.08.007
– volume: 30
  start-page: 3563
  year: 2021
  end-page: 3569
  ident: CR9
  article-title: Prevalence of junctional kyphosis in early-onset scoliosis: can it be corrected at final fusion?
  publication-title: Eur Spine J
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06968-0
– volume: 84
  start-page: 1112
  year: 2019
  end-page: 1123
  ident: CR14
  article-title: Mean 6-year follow-up of magnetically controlled growing rod patients with early onset scoliosis: a glimpse of what happens to graduates
  publication-title: Neurosurgery
  doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy270
– volume: 42
  start-page: E1410
  year: 2017
  end-page: 1414
  ident: CR24
  article-title: Unplanned reoperations in magnetically controlled growing rod surgery for early onset scoliosis with a minimum of two-year follow-up
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002297
– volume: 99
  start-page: 1554
  year: 2017
  end-page: 1564
  ident: CR36
  article-title: Graduation protocol after growing-rod treatment: removal of implants without new instrumentation is not a realistic approach
  publication-title: J Bone Jt Surg Am
  doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00031
– volume: 45
  start-page: 872876
  year: 2020
  ident: CR27
  article-title: The NuVasive MAGEC rod urgent field safety notice concerning locking pin fracture: how does data from an independent explant center compare?
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003439
– volume: 12
  start-page: 599
  issue: 587
  year: 2014
  ident: CR1
  article-title: The MAGEC system for spinal lengthening in children with scoliosis: a NICE medical technology guidance
  publication-title: Appl Health Econ Health Policy
  doi: 10.1007/s40258-014-0127-4
– volume: 27
  start-page: 168
  year: 2018
  end-page: 175
  ident: CR33
  article-title: Sagittal plane parameters in growing rod patients following final fusion
  publication-title: J Pediatr Orthop B
  doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000446
– volume: 30
  start-page: 1905
  year: 2021
  end-page: 1911
  ident: CR28
  article-title: Metallosis is commonly associated with magnetically controlled growing rods; results from an independent multicentre explant database
  publication-title: Eur Spine J
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06750-2
– volume: 36
  start-page: 806
  year: 2011
  end-page: 809
  ident: CR38
  article-title: Lengthening of dual growing rods and the law of diminishing returns
  publication-title: Spine(Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318214d78f
– volume: 44
  start-page: 1630
  year: 2019
  end-page: 1637
  ident: CR30
  article-title: Outcomes at Skeletal maturity of 34 children with scoliosis treated with a traditional single growing rod
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003148
– volume: 33
  start-page: 984
  year: 2008
  end-page: 990
  ident: CR31
  article-title: Dual growing rod technique followed for three to eleven years until final fusion: the effect of frequency of lengthening
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8b4e
– volume: 98
  start-page: 1073
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1078
  ident: CR8
  article-title: Avoidance of final surgical fusion after growing-rod treatment for early-onset scoliosis
  publication-title: J Bone Jt Surg Am
  doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01241
– volume: 99-B
  start-page: 708
  year: 2017
  end-page: 713
  ident: CR25
  article-title: Magnetically controlled growing rods in the treatment of early-onset scoliosis: a note of caution
  publication-title: Bone Jt J
  doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B6.BJJ-2016-1102.R2
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1567
  year: 2017
  end-page: 1576
  ident: CR17
  article-title: Magnetically controlled growing rod in early onset scoliosis: a 30-case multicenter study
  publication-title: Eur Spine J
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4929-y
– volume: 37
  start-page: 79
  year: 2017
  end-page: 85
  ident: CR20
  article-title: Magnetically controlled growing rods for the management of early-onset scoliosis: a preliminary report
  publication-title: J Pediatr Orthop
  doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000597
– volume: 35
  start-page: E1199
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1203
  ident: CR11
  article-title: Autofusion in the immature spine treated with growing rods
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e21b50
– volume: 14
  start-page: e7
  year: 2014
  end-page: 13
  ident: CR5
  article-title: A novel approach to gradual correction of severe spinal deformity in a pediatric patient using the magnetically-controlled growing rod
  publication-title: Spine J
  doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.01.046
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1567
  year: 2017
  ident: 7834_CR17
  publication-title: Eur Spine J
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4929-y
– volume: 4
  start-page: 407
  year: 2016
  ident: 7834_CR29
  publication-title: Spine Deform
  doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2016.08.007
– volume: 2
  start-page: 493
  year: 2014
  ident: 7834_CR4
  publication-title: Spine Deform
  doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2014.09.050
– volume: 99-B
  start-page: 1658
  year: 2017
  ident: 7834_CR37
  publication-title: Bone Jt J.
  doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B12.BJJ-2017-0402.R2
– volume: 6
  start-page: 308
  year: 2018
  ident: 7834_CR10
  publication-title: Spine Deform
  doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2017.10.005
– volume: 104-B
  start-page: 264
  issue: 257
  year: 2022
  ident: 7834_CR13
  publication-title: Bone Jt J
  doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B2.BJJ-2021-1198.R1
– volume: 27
  start-page: 168
  year: 2018
  ident: 7834_CR33
  publication-title: J Pediatr Orthop B
  doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000446
– volume: 12
  start-page: 221
  year: 2022
  ident: 7834_CR39
  publication-title: Glob Spine J
  doi: 10.1177/2192568220948475
– volume: 30
  start-page: 3563
  year: 2021
  ident: 7834_CR9
  publication-title: Eur Spine J
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06968-0
– volume: 12
  start-page: 599
  issue: 587
  year: 2014
  ident: 7834_CR1
  publication-title: Appl Health Econ Health Policy
  doi: 10.1007/s40258-014-0127-4
– volume: 27
  start-page: 2062
  year: 2018
  ident: 7834_CR22
  publication-title: Eur Spine J
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5590-4
– volume: 30
  start-page: 1905
  year: 2021
  ident: 7834_CR28
  publication-title: Eur Spine J
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06750-2
– volume: 37
  start-page: 79
  year: 2017
  ident: 7834_CR20
  publication-title: J Pediatr Orthop
  doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000597
– volume: 95
  start-page: 1745
  year: 2013
  ident: 7834_CR6
  publication-title: J Bone Jt Surg Am
  doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01386
– volume: 41
  start-page: 1456
  year: 2016
  ident: 7834_CR21
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001561
– volume: 40
  start-page: e942
  year: 2020
  ident: 7834_CR32
  publication-title: J Pediatr Orthop
  doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001646
– volume: 42
  start-page: E1410
  year: 2017
  ident: 7834_CR24
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002297
– volume: 13
  start-page: 682
  year: 2019
  ident: 7834_CR23
  publication-title: Asian Spine J
  doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.0272
– volume: 9
  start-page: 679
  year: 2021
  ident: 7834_CR12
  publication-title: Spine Deform
  doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00255-6
– volume: 99-B
  start-page: 708
  year: 2017
  ident: 7834_CR25
  publication-title: Bone Jt J
  doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B6.BJJ-2016-1102.R2
– volume: 14
  start-page: e7
  year: 2014
  ident: 7834_CR5
  publication-title: Spine J
  doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.01.046
– volume: 44
  start-page: 1201
  year: 2019
  ident: 7834_CR15
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003048
– volume: 141
  start-page: 1163
  year: 2021
  ident: 7834_CR19
  publication-title: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03518-z
– volume: 38
  start-page: 665
  year: 2013
  ident: 7834_CR3
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182773560
– volume: 44
  start-page: 1630
  year: 2019
  ident: 7834_CR30
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003148
– volume: 46
  start-page: E1105
  year: 2021
  ident: 7834_CR18
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004044
– volume: 35
  start-page: E1199
  year: 2010
  ident: 7834_CR11
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e21b50
– volume: 36
  start-page: 806
  year: 2011
  ident: 7834_CR38
  publication-title: Spine(Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318214d78f
– volume: 45
  start-page: 872876
  year: 2020
  ident: 7834_CR27
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003439
– volume: 33
  start-page: 984
  year: 2008
  ident: 7834_CR31
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8b4e
– volume: 15
  start-page: 201
  year: 2019
  ident: 7834_CR35
  publication-title: HSS J
  doi: 10.1007/s11420-019-09671-5
– year: 2022
  ident: 7834_CR26
  publication-title: Glob Spine J
  doi: 10.1177/21925682221090926
– volume: 99
  start-page: 1554
  year: 2017
  ident: 7834_CR36
  publication-title: J Bone Jt Surg Am
  doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00031
– volume: 98
  start-page: 1913
  year: 2016
  ident: 7834_CR34
  publication-title: J Bone Jt Surg Am
  doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01334
– volume: 8
  start-page: 547
  year: 2020
  ident: 7834_CR7
  publication-title: Spine Deform
  doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00077-6
– volume: 98
  start-page: 1073
  year: 2016
  ident: 7834_CR8
  publication-title: J Bone Jt Surg Am
  doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01241
– volume: 84
  start-page: 1112
  year: 2019
  ident: 7834_CR14
  publication-title: Neurosurgery
  doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy270
– volume: 37
  start-page: 1109
  year: 2012
  ident: 7834_CR2
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318240ff67
– volume: 32
  start-page: 478
  year: 2021
  ident: 7834_CR16
  publication-title: Jt Dis Relat Surg.
  doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2021.49
SSID ssj0015906
Score 2.4164872
Snippet Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of definitive arthrodesis on frontal and sagittal spine balance in EOS patients treated with MCGR, as...
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of definitive arthrodesis on frontal and sagittal spine balance in EOS patients treated with MCGR, as well as...
PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of definitive arthrodesis on frontal and sagittal spine balance in EOS patients treated with MCGR, as...
SourceID hal
proquest
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 3118
SubjectTerms Arthrodesis
Back surgery
Complications
Etiology
Hospitals
Life Sciences
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neurosurgery
Original Article
Orthopedics
Patients
Pediatrics
Postoperative
Scoliosis
Surgical Orthopedics
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwELZo4cCFh3gF2mpA3MAQJ87rVFWoVQ-o4gDS3iInttuV0mTJo9v-sP6_zmSdFFTRC8fdHXsd5Zvx2PP4GPuohNS6CBRXfiq5LOKAF6WJeJloU0hhReDbkWwiOTlJF4vsh7tw61xa5WQTR0Otm5LuyL8G5HpHxNC9v_rNiTWKoquOQmOLPSTabMJ5spgPXLhTj9ya1CKOx4nIXNHMWDpHfHqUfhtyCmRJfvnXxrR1RmmRd33OO_HScRs6evq_D_CMPXEOKBxsEPOcPTD1C3bt2oNWoGoNrdLLySYCHseHqu-gsWCJQQvsQBdssKzB9WTtYH3WABWjtWv8CMTNQj0VcP1A17xwrk7rTa1kdQUuN74yGk7bZk1CaMO7L0ABqB7i-I9pabCCc6NqsDikWfNhRQuJ4AoVtHvJfh0d_vx2zB2hAy_xGNlzmfklejxFjHZEWpVFoSwKZdGIqCxVsUyMsUYaZQR6DbGWgTBR4AdGRUJRzW_4im3XTW3eMNCJr0pRRKkOpTRZlJaFlBbVAieQ6GJ5TExvMy9dt3Mi3ajyuU_ziIAcEZCPCMgvPfZpHrPa9Pq4V_oDgmQWpDbdxwffc_oO3eQQHTl5ITy2M4Ehd8ahy2-R4LH388-o1hSrUbVpBpIJ0RNLUNJjrzfYm_-KmlEFcYbP-HkC4-3k_17w2_vX8o49DkZ1oPy5Hbbdt4PZZY_Ki37ZtXujYt0AMIsq_A
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Clinical and radiological results of final fusion in patients who underwent lengthening with magnetically controlled growing rods. About 66 patients with a mean follow-up of 5 years
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00586-023-07834-x
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37382696
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2862655908
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2831297862
https://hal.univ-lille.fr/hal-04536354
Volume 32
WOSCitedRecordID wos001017765400001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAVX
  databaseName: Springer Standard Collection
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1432-0932
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0015906
  issn: 0940-6719
  databaseCode: RSV
  dateStart: 19970101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22
  providerName: Springer Nature
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3bbtQwELVoixAvLfeGltWAeAOjOHFujwW16gOsqnLRvkVOYrcrpUm1Sbr0b_gKPqBf1pmsE0AFJHhZaTdjxyuPx8eey2HspRKyKDJPceXGksss9HiW64DnUaEzKYzwXNOTTUTTaTybJUc2KawZot0Hl2RvqcdkN2LAo4BZn5PrSXJEjhu43cVE2HD88cvoOwiSnlGTCsPxMBKJTZX5fR-_bEdrpxQMeRNp3vCS9pvPwdb_Dfse27RgE_ZW2nGf3dLVA3bng3WnP2TfbVXQElRVwEIV88EUAp7Cu7JtoDZgiDgLTEf3ajCvwJZibWB5WgPloC2W-BWIkoVKKeDggG534UydVKsUyfISbEh8qQs4wZM_CaHpbt4A-Z1aCMOfuqXGCs60qsBgk3rJu3MaSHD17RIXZvOIfT7Y__TukFsiB57j8bHlMnFzRDpZiPZDGpUEvswyZdB4qCRWoYy0NlpqpQWihbCQntCB53paBUJRrq__mK1XdaW3GRSRq3KRBXHhS6mTIM4zKQ0uB-xAIrRymBjmM81tlXMi2yjTsT5zPyEpTkjaT0j61WGvxjbnqxoff5V-gWoyClJ57sO99yn9hvDYRwAnL4TDdgctSq1RaFKPTo8Bkcw77Pn4GJcz-WhUpeuOZHxEYBFKOuzJSvvGV1ERKi9M8D--HlTtR-d_HvDTfxPfYXe9Xlspjm6XrbeLTj9jt_OLdt4sJmwtmkX9ZzxhG2_3p0fHk375XQPRuSmy
linkProvider Springer Nature
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Lb9QwELbaggQXHuIVKDAgOIFL4jivA0IVUG3VZcWhSHsLTuK0K6XJkkfT_VPc-H_MZJMUVNFbDxw3O3a83m_GM54XY6-UJZMkEoor05dcRq7gUawdHnuJjqSVWsJMu2YT3mzmz-fB1w32c8iFobDKQSZ2gjopYrojfydI9XaoQ_eH5Q9OXaPIuzq00FjD4kCvWjTZqvf7n_D_fS3E3ufDjxPedxXgMdoyNZeBGeOxG7kIZpmqwLFlFKkUkawCX7nS0zrVUitt4dHlJlJY2hGm0MqxFCWe2jjvJruGctwjY8-bjwYeagZdL08qScddzwr6JJ0uVY_691G4r83JcSb52V8H4eYxhWFe1HEv-Ge7Y2_v9v-2YXfYrV7Bht01R9xlGzq_x3715U8zUHkCpUoWg8yHUldNVldQpJBShzBIG7pAhEUOfc3ZCtrjAijZrmzxI1DvGaoZgfsFdI0NJ-ooX-eCZivoY_8zncBRWbREhGdUtQPkYKvBdf-YlgYrONEqhxSHFC1vlrQQB1a4cdV99u1KduoB28qLXD9ikHimiq3I8RNbSh04fhxJmSLb4wQSVUiDWQN6wriv5k5NRbJwrEPdIS5ExIUd4sIzg70ZxyzXtUwupX6JoBwJqQz5ZHca0jM0A2xUVOWpZbDtAXxhL_yq8Bx5Bnsxfo1ii3xRKtdFQzQ2apoeUhrs4Rrr46uo2JZwA_yNbwfwn0_-7wU_vnwtz9mNyeGXaTjdnx08YTdFx4oUK7jNtuqy0U_Z9fi0XlTls46pgX2_aqb4DScThlo
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Lb9NAEB61KUJceIhXoMCA4ARL4_Xajg8IFdqoVasoQiD1Ztb2bhsptYOdNM0P48KvY8axXVBFbz1wjDO73my-eezOC-C1dlSaxlIL3esroWJfijgxnkiC1MTKsY7s2arZRDAc9o-OwtEa_GpyYTisspGJlaBO84TvyLckm94ed-jesnVYxGhn8HH6Q3AHKfa0Nu00VhA5MMsFHd_KD_s79F-_kXKw-_Xznqg7DIiEzjUzocJeQio49gnYyurQc1Uca0uo1mFf-yowxhpltHFIjfmpko7xZE8a7Tmak1BdmncdNgIyMlQHNj7tDkdfWh8GrbXylIZVgL0T1ik7VeIed_Pj4F9XsBtNifO_1OL6CQdlXrZ4L3lrKyU4uPM_b99duF2b3ri94pV7sGay-_CzLow6QZ2lWOh03GgDLEw5n8xKzC1a7h2Gds5XizjOsK5GW-LiJEdOwysW9BG5Kw1Xk6C9Q77gxlN9nK2yRCdLrLMCJibF4yJfMBFpr_I9sutthr7_x7Q8WOOp0RlaGpIvxHzKC_FwSRtXPoBv17JTD6GT5Zl5DJgGPZ04sddPXaVM6PWTWClLAoEmUGRcdsFpkBQldZ13bjcyidoK1RX6IkJfVKEvOu_C23bMdFXl5ErqVwTQlpALlO9tH0b8jA4ILpmw6szpwmYDxKgWi2V0gcIuvGy_JoHGXiqdmXzONC7ZoAFRduHRCvftq7gMl_RD-o3vGka4mPzfC35y9VpewE3ihehwf3jwFG7Jiis5iHATOrNibp7BjeRsNi6L5zWHI3y_bq74DVShkHo
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical+and+radiological+results+of+final+fusion+in+patients+who+underwent+lengthening+with+magnetically+controlled+growing+rods.+About+66+patients+with+a+mean+follow-up+of+5%C2%A0years&rft.jtitle=European+spine+journal&rft.au=Mainard%2C+Nicolas&rft.au=Saghbini%2C+Elie&rft.au=Langlais%2C+Tristan&rft.au=Vialle%2C+Raphael&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.pub=Springer+Berlin+Heidelberg&rft.issn=0940-6719&rft.eissn=1432-0932&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=3118&rft.epage=3132&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs00586-023-07834-x&rft.externalDocID=10_1007_s00586_023_07834_x
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0940-6719&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0940-6719&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0940-6719&client=summon