Debilitating Research: Scholarship of the Obvious and Epistemic Trauma

Research on violence can be debilitating and traumatic. Research fields that explore obvious violence that is largely ignored, minimised or erased can induce epistemic effects that may look like failure or procrastination. That there is very little research on or support for researchers who do resea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:African studies (Johannesburg) Vol. 83; no. 2-3; pp. 134 - 151
Main Author: Mohamed, Kharnita
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Abingdon Routledge 02.07.2024
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects:
ISSN:0002-0184, 1469-2872
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Research on violence can be debilitating and traumatic. Research fields that explore obvious violence that is largely ignored, minimised or erased can induce epistemic effects that may look like failure or procrastination. That there is very little research on or support for researchers who do research on violence lays bare the ontological presuppositions of the ideal researcher. This article explores what it felt like to do research where ontological erasure was normalised, and places pressure on the presuppositions of the ideal researcher amid scholarship on obvious violence. Debilitation can be a response to epistemic gaslighting, epistemic violence and epistemic trauma and indicate affective refusals and ethical tussling. Being brought to a standstill by research on violence can offer critical epistemic insight that requires using and valuing failure as symptomatic of epistemic relations and refusing the hyper-ableist demands of the academy.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0002-0184
1469-2872
DOI:10.1080/00020184.2024.2431801