Absence of binocular summation, eye dominance, and learning effects in color discrimination
We evaluated binocular summation, eye dominance, and learning in the Trivector and Ellipses procedures of the Cambridge Colour Test (CCT). Subjects (n = 36, 18–30 years old) were recruited among students and staff from the University of São Paulo. Inclusion criteria were absence of ophthalmological...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | Visual neuroscience Ročník 23; číslo 3-4; s. 461 - 469 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
New York, USA
Cambridge University Press
01.05.2006
|
| Témata: | |
| ISSN: | 0952-5238, 1469-8714 |
| On-line přístup: | Získat plný text |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Abstract | We evaluated binocular summation, eye dominance, and learning in the
Trivector and Ellipses procedures of the Cambridge Colour Test (CCT).
Subjects (n = 36, 18–30 years old) were recruited among
students and staff from the University of São Paulo. Inclusion
criteria were absence of ophthalmological complaints and best-corrected
Snellen VA 20/20 or better. The subjects were tested in three randomly
selected eye conditions: binocular, monocular dominant eye, and
nondominant eye. Results obtained in the binocular and monocular
conditions did not differ statistically for thresholds measured along the
protan, deutan, and tritan confusion axes (ANOVA, P > 0.05).
No statistical difference was detected among discrimination ellipses
obtained in binocular or monocular conditions (ANOVA, P >
0.05), suggesting absence of binocular summation or of an effect of eye
dominance. Possible effects of learning were examined by comparing
successive thresholds obtained in the three testing conditions. There was
no evidence of improvement as a function of testing order (ANCOVA,
P > 0.05). We conclude that CCT thresholds are not affected by
binocularity, eye dominance, or learning. Our results differ from those
found by Verriest et al. (1982) using the
Farnsworth-Munsell 100 Hue test and Hovis et al. (2004) using the Farnsworth-Munsell panel D-15
test. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | We evaluated binocular summation, eye dominance, and learning in the
Trivector and Ellipses procedures of the Cambridge Colour Test (CCT).
Subjects (n = 36, 18–30 years old) were recruited among
students and staff from the University of São Paulo. Inclusion
criteria were absence of ophthalmological complaints and best-corrected
Snellen VA 20/20 or better. The subjects were tested in three randomly
selected eye conditions: binocular, monocular dominant eye, and
nondominant eye. Results obtained in the binocular and monocular
conditions did not differ statistically for thresholds measured along the
protan, deutan, and tritan confusion axes (ANOVA, P > 0.05).
No statistical difference was detected among discrimination ellipses
obtained in binocular or monocular conditions (ANOVA, P >
0.05), suggesting absence of binocular summation or of an effect of eye
dominance. Possible effects of learning were examined by comparing
successive thresholds obtained in the three testing conditions. There was
no evidence of improvement as a function of testing order (ANCOVA,
P > 0.05). We conclude that CCT thresholds are not affected by
binocularity, eye dominance, or learning. Our results differ from those
found by Verriest et al. (1982) using the
Farnsworth-Munsell 100 Hue test and Hovis et al. (2004) using the Farnsworth-Munsell panel D-15
test. We evaluated binocular summation, eye dominance, and learning in the Trivector and Ellipses procedures of the Cambridge Colour Test (CCT). Subjects ( n = 36, 18–30 years old) were recruited among students and staff from the University of São Paulo. Inclusion criteria were absence of ophthalmological complaints and best-corrected Snellen VA 20/20 or better. The subjects were tested in three randomly selected eye conditions: binocular, monocular dominant eye, and nondominant eye. Results obtained in the binocular and monocular conditions did not differ statistically for thresholds measured along the protan, deutan, and tritan confusion axes (ANOVA, P > 0.05). No statistical difference was detected among discrimination ellipses obtained in binocular or monocular conditions (ANOVA, P > 0.05), suggesting absence of binocular summation or of an effect of eye dominance. Possible effects of learning were examined by comparing successive thresholds obtained in the three testing conditions. There was no evidence of improvement as a function of testing order (ANCOVA, P > 0.05). We conclude that CCT thresholds are not affected by binocularity, eye dominance, or learning. Our results differ from those found by Verriest et al. (1982) using the Farnsworth-Munsell 100 Hue test and Hovis et al. (2004) using the Farnsworth-Munsell panel D-15 test. We evaluated binocular summation, eye dominance, and learning in the Trivector and Ellipses procedures of the Cambridge Colour Test (CCT). Subjects (n = 36, 18-30 years old) were recruited among students and staff from the University of São Paulo. Inclusion criteria were absence of ophthalmological complaints and best-corrected Snellen VA 20/20 or better. The subjects were tested in three randomly selected eye conditions: binocular, monocular dominant eye, and nondominant eye. Results obtained in the binocular and monocular conditions did not differ statistically for thresholds measured along the protan, deutan, and tritan confusion axes (ANOVA, P > 0.05). No statistical difference was detected among discrimination ellipses obtained in binocular or monocular conditions (ANOVA, P > 0.05), suggesting absence of binocular summation or of an effect of eye dominance. Possible effects of learning were examined by comparing successive thresholds obtained in the three testing conditions. There was no evidence of improvement as a function of testing order (ANCOVA, P > 0.05). We conclude that CCT thresholds are not affected by binocularity, eye dominance, or learning. Our results differ from those found by Verriest et al. (1982) using the Farnsworth-Munsell 100 Hue test and Hovis et al. (2004) using the Farnsworth-Munsell panel D-15 test. We evaluated binocular summation, eye dominance, and learning in the Trivector and Ellipses procedures of the Cambridge Colour Test (CCT). Subjects (n = 36, 18-30 years old) were recruited among students and staff from the University of São Paulo. Inclusion criteria were absence of ophthalmological complaints and best-corrected Snellen VA 20/20 or better. The subjects were tested in three randomly selected eye conditions: binocular, monocular dominant eye, and nondominant eye. Results obtained in the binocular and monocular conditions did not differ statistically for thresholds measured along the protan, deutan, and tritan confusion axes (ANOVA, P > 0.05). No statistical difference was detected among discrimination ellipses obtained in binocular or monocular conditions (ANOVA, P > 0.05), suggesting absence of binocular summation or of an effect of eye dominance. Possible effects of learning were examined by comparing successive thresholds obtained in the three testing conditions. There was no evidence of improvement as a function of testing order (ANCOVA, P > 0.05). We conclude that CCT thresholds are not affected by binocularity, eye dominance, or learning. Our results differ from those found by Verriest et al. (1982) using the Farnsworth-Munsell 100 Hue test and Hovis et al. (2004) using the Farnsworth-Munsell panel D-15 test.We evaluated binocular summation, eye dominance, and learning in the Trivector and Ellipses procedures of the Cambridge Colour Test (CCT). Subjects (n = 36, 18-30 years old) were recruited among students and staff from the University of São Paulo. Inclusion criteria were absence of ophthalmological complaints and best-corrected Snellen VA 20/20 or better. The subjects were tested in three randomly selected eye conditions: binocular, monocular dominant eye, and nondominant eye. Results obtained in the binocular and monocular conditions did not differ statistically for thresholds measured along the protan, deutan, and tritan confusion axes (ANOVA, P > 0.05). No statistical difference was detected among discrimination ellipses obtained in binocular or monocular conditions (ANOVA, P > 0.05), suggesting absence of binocular summation or of an effect of eye dominance. Possible effects of learning were examined by comparing successive thresholds obtained in the three testing conditions. There was no evidence of improvement as a function of testing order (ANCOVA, P > 0.05). We conclude that CCT thresholds are not affected by binocularity, eye dominance, or learning. Our results differ from those found by Verriest et al. (1982) using the Farnsworth-Munsell 100 Hue test and Hovis et al. (2004) using the Farnsworth-Munsell panel D-15 test. We evaluated binocular summation, eye dominance, and learning in the Trivector and Ellipses procedures of the Cambridge Colour Test (CCT). Subjects (n = 36, 18-30 years old) were recruited among students and staff from the University of São Paulo. Inclusion criteria were absence of ophthalmological complaints and best-corrected Snellen VA 20/20 or better. The subjects were tested in three randomly selected eye conditions: binocular, monocular dominant eye, and nondominant eye. Results obtained in the binocular and monocular conditions did not differ statistically for thresholds measured along the protan, deutan, and tritan confusion axes (ANOVA, P > 0.05). No statistical difference was detected among discrimination ellipses obtained in binocular or monocular conditions (ANOVA, P > 0.05), suggesting absence of binocular summation or of an effect of eye dominance. Possible effects of learning were examined by comparing successive thresholds obtained in the three testing conditions. There was no evidence of improvement as a function of testing order (ANCOVA, P > 0.05). We conclude that CCT thresholds are not affected by binocularity, eye dominance, or learning. Our results differ from those found by Verriest et al. (1982) using the Farnsworth-Munsell 100 Hue test and Hovis et al. (2004) using the Farnsworth-Munsell panel D-15 test. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
| Author | SILVEIRA, LUIZ CARLOS DE LIMA COSTA, MARCELO FERNANDES PERAZZOLO, FELIPE VENTURA, DORA FIX MURAKOSHI, MARCIO |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: MARCELO FERNANDES surname: COSTA fullname: COSTA, MARCELO FERNANDES organization: Dep. Psicologia Experimental, Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil – sequence: 2 givenname: DORA FIX surname: VENTURA fullname: VENTURA, DORA FIX organization: Dep. Psicologia Experimental, Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil – sequence: 3 givenname: FELIPE surname: PERAZZOLO fullname: PERAZZOLO, FELIPE organization: Dep. Psicologia Experimental, Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil – sequence: 4 givenname: MARCIO surname: MURAKOSHI fullname: MURAKOSHI, MARCIO organization: Dep. Psicologia Experimental, Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil – sequence: 5 givenname: LUIZ CARLOS DE LIMA surname: SILVEIRA fullname: SILVEIRA, LUIZ CARLOS DE LIMA organization: Dep. Fisiologia Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Brasil |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16961981$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9kU9PFjEQxhuDkRfwA3gxjQdPLLbb7b8jIQoajCFAYvDQtLuzpLjbQrubyLe36_tCDEZOc5jfM_M8MztoK8QACL2h5IASKj-cE81rXjNFRM0Ypd9foBVthK6UpM0WWi3taulvo52cbwihjHL2Cm1ToQXViq7Qj0OXIbSAY4-dD7GdB5twnsfRTj6GfQz3gLs4-mALtY9t6PAANgUfrjH0PbRTxj7gNg4x4c7nNvkFXsR76GVvhwyvN3UXXX76eHF0Up1-O_58dHhatQ1RUzHobC2UAu6cBN6oTlsCoDvduob3PRNOKsJ74jTXjnakJsIxUE5YrWvVs130fj33NsW7GfJkxuIDhsEGiHM2ZXZDpGQFfPcEvIlzCsWbKddgNam5LNDbDTS7ETpzWwLZdG8eblYAuQbaFHNO0JvWT38CT8n6wVBilu-Yf75TlPSJ8nH4M5pqrfF5gl-PApt-GiGZ5EYcn5mvF1xdXZ2cmy-FZ5sddnTJd9fwV8j_bvkN7Xyu4w |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3389_fnint_2023_1129315 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0952523808080589 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2016_00429 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2016_01006 crossref_primary_10_1017_S095252380808019X crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2020_00314 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_visres_2016_11_007 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12983_021_00421_0 crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics14040396 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40123_017_0101_y crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_09531_z crossref_primary_10_1186_s12576_024_00898_4 crossref_primary_10_1086_518127 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41433_019_0477_0 crossref_primary_10_1167_iovs_63_5_20 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2017_01127 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0952523808080437 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90143-K 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.05.027 10.1016/j.visres.2005.02.022 10.1093/brain/awh581 10.1080/00207450290025626 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00211-4 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90253-4 10.3758/BF03194563 10.1017/S0952523804213402 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90203-8 10.1002/col.10179 10.3758/BF03194802 10.1076/ceyr.26.4.297.15430 10.3109/02713689609007626 10.1016/S0925-4927(00)00074-3 10.2466/pms.1999.88.2.424 10.1080/00207450590519067 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198525301.003.0034 10.1076/ceyr.27.5.315.17225 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)77380-5 10.2466/pms.100.3.761-766 10.1097/01.opx.0000135085.54136.65 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90269-0 10.1167/2.10.28 10.1093/brain/awf210 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198525301.003.0042 10.3758/BF03196159 10.1067/mpa.2002.120170 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00272-1 10.1016/j.etap.2004.12.016 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00009-O 10.1016/j.etap.2004.12.015 10.1017/S0952523804213372 10.1016/j.neunet.2004.02.006 10.1007/BF00160771 10.1007/BF03399660 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2006 Cambridge University Press Copyright Cambridge University Press May 2006 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2006 Cambridge University Press – notice: Copyright Cambridge University Press May 2006 |
| DBID | BSCLL AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7TK 7X7 7XB 88E 88G 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ K9. M0S M1P M2M PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PSYQQ Q9U 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1017/S095252380623311X |
| DatabaseName | Istex CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Neurosciences Abstracts Health & Medical Collection (Proquest) ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Psychology Database (Alumni) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) PML(ProQuest Medical Library) Psychology Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic (retired) ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Psychology ProQuest Central Basic MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest One Psychology ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Psychology Journals (Alumni) Neurosciences Abstracts ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest Psychology Journals ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic ProQuest One Psychology |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: BENPR name: AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine Anatomy & Physiology |
| EISSN | 1469-8714 |
| EndPage | 469 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 1457142281 16961981 10_1017_S095252380623311X ark_67375_6GQ_MT58ZZHS_J |
| Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Comparative Study |
| GroupedDBID | --- -1D -1F -2P -2V -E. -~6 -~N -~X .FH .GJ 09C 0E1 0R~ 123 29R 3V. 4.4 53G 5RE 5VS 6~7 74X 74Y 7X7 7~V 88E 8FI 8FJ 8R4 8R5 9M5 AAAZR AABES AABWE AACJH AAGFV AAKTX AAMNQ AANRG AARAB AASVR AATID AATMM AAUIS AAUKB ABBXD ABBZL ABITZ ABIVO ABJNI ABKKG ABMWE ABQTM ABQWD ABROB ABTCQ ABUWG ABVFV ABVKB ABVZP ABWCF ABXAU ABZCX ABZUI ACAJB ACBEK ACBMC ACETC ACGFS ACIMK ACMRT ACNCT ACPRK ACQPF ACRPL ACUIJ ACYZP ACZBM ACZUX ACZWT ADAZD ADBBV ADDNB ADFEC ADKIL ADNMO ADOVH ADOVT ADVJH AEBAK AEBPU AEHGV AEMFK AEMTW AENCP AENEX AENGE AEYHU AEYYC AFFUJ AFKQG AFKRA AFLOS AFLVW AFUTZ AGABE AGJUD AGLWM AHIPN AHLTW AHMBA AHQXX AHRGI AIGNW AIHIV AIOIP AISIE AJ7 AJCYY AJPFC AJQAS AKZCZ ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALVPG ALWZO ANPSP AQJOH ARABE ARZZG ATUCA AUXHV AYIQA AZGZS AZQEC BBLKV BCGOX BENPR BESQT BGHMG BJBOZ BLZWO BMAJL BPHCQ BQFHP BRIRG BVXVI C0O CAG CBIIA CCPQU CCQAD CCUQV CDIZJ CFAFE CFBFF CGQII CHEAL CJCSC COF CS3 DC4 DOHLZ DU5 DWQXO EBS EGQIC EJD EMOBN F5P FA8 FYUFA GNUQQ HG- HMCUK HST HZ~ I.6 I.7 I.9 IH6 IOEEP IOO IPYYG IS6 I~P J36 J38 J3A JHPGK JKPOH JQKCU JVRFK KAFGG KCGVB KFECR L98 LHUNA LW7 M-V M1P M2M M48 M7~ M8. MVM NIKVX NMFBF NZEOI O9- OYBOY P2P PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PSYQQ Q2X RAMDC RCA RIG ROL RR0 S6- S6U SAAAG SY4 T9M UKHRP UT1 UU6 WFFJZ WQ3 WXU WYP ZDLDU ZJOSE ZMEZD ZYDXJ ~V1 AAKNA ABGDZ ACEJA AGQPQ ANOYL BSCLL FRJ PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PPXIY PUEGO AAFWJ AAXMD AAYXX AEMTJ AFFHD CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7TK 7XB 8FK K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI Q9U 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-52ba2688e5bb7e548d9a0ee9d9cb45ff36b7805f0b959b1d0206b3e8b6a9928f3 |
| IEDL.DBID | M2M |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 32 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000240481500022&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 0952-5238 |
| IngestDate | Wed Oct 01 14:49:35 EDT 2025 Fri Oct 03 04:35:45 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 01:43:15 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 05:32:40 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 21:36:19 EST 2025 Sun Aug 31 06:50:31 EDT 2025 Tue Jan 21 06:28:57 EST 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 3-4 |
| Keywords | Chromatic discrimination Binocular summation Eye dominance Color vision Psychophysical detection threshold |
| Language | English |
| License | https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c408t-52ba2688e5bb7e548d9a0ee9d9cb45ff36b7805f0b959b1d0206b3e8b6a9928f3 |
| Notes | PII:S095252380623311X ark:/67375/6GQ-MT58ZZHS-J PMID:16961981 istex:4A6647944AF5583DBF8EF0C7C8F1249CE5A67ED9 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| PMID | 16961981 |
| PQID | 198320257 |
| PQPubID | 31753 |
| PageCount | 9 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_68840773 proquest_journals_198320257 pubmed_primary_16961981 crossref_citationtrail_10_1017_S095252380623311X crossref_primary_10_1017_S095252380623311X istex_primary_ark_67375_6GQ_MT58ZZHS_J cambridge_journals_10_1017_S095252380623311X |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 20060500 2006-05 2006-05-00 2006 May-Aug 20060501 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2006-05-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 5 year: 2006 text: 20060500 |
| PublicationDecade | 2000 |
| PublicationPlace | New York, USA |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: New York, USA – name: England – name: Cambridge |
| PublicationTitle | Visual neuroscience |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Vis Neurosci |
| PublicationYear | 2006 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Cambridge University Press |
| References | S095252380623311X_ref007 S095252380623311X_ref029 S095252380623311X_ref008 S095252380623311X_ref009 S095252380623311X_ref025 S095252380623311X_ref003 S095252380623311X_ref026 S095252380623311X_ref004 S095252380623311X_ref005 S095252380623311X_ref027 S095252380623311X_ref006 S095252380623311X_ref028 S095252380623311X_ref043 S095252380623311X_ref021 S095252380623311X_ref044 S095252380623311X_ref022 S095252380623311X_ref023 S095252380623311X_ref045 S095252380623311X_ref001 S095252380623311X_ref024 S095252380623311X_ref002 S095252380623311X_ref040 S095252380623311X_ref041 S095252380623311X_ref020 S095252380623311X_ref042 S095252380623311X_ref018 S095252380623311X_ref019 S095252380623311X_ref014 S095252380623311X_ref036 S095252380623311X_ref015 S095252380623311X_ref037 S095252380623311X_ref016 S095252380623311X_ref038 S095252380623311X_ref017 S095252380623311X_ref039 S095252380623311X_ref010 S095252380623311X_ref032 S095252380623311X_ref033 S095252380623311X_ref011 S095252380623311X_ref034 S095252380623311X_ref012 S095252380623311X_ref035 S095252380623311X_ref013 S095252380623311X_ref030 S095252380623311X_ref031 |
| References_xml | – ident: S095252380623311X_ref023 doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90143-K – ident: S095252380623311X_ref025 doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.05.027 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref007 doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.02.022 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref036 doi: 10.1093/brain/awh581 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref013 doi: 10.1080/00207450290025626 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref012 doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00211-4 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref003 doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90253-4 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref021 doi: 10.3758/BF03194563 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref019 doi: 10.1017/S0952523804213402 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref034 doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90203-8 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref022 doi: 10.1002/col.10179 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref028 doi: 10.3758/BF03194802 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref016 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref033 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref032 doi: 10.1076/ceyr.26.4.297.15430 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref030 doi: 10.3109/02713689609007626 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref010 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref011 doi: 10.1016/S0925-4927(00)00074-3 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref008 doi: 10.2466/pms.1999.88.2.424 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref024 doi: 10.1080/00207450590519067 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref042 doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198525301.003.0034 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref015 doi: 10.1076/ceyr.27.5.315.17225 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref044 doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)77380-5 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref039 doi: 10.2466/pms.100.3.761-766 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref029 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref018 doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000135085.54136.65 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref037 doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90269-0 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref005 doi: 10.1167/2.10.28 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref035 doi: 10.1093/brain/awf210 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref004 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref002 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref040 doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198525301.003.0042 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref009 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref020 doi: 10.3758/BF03196159 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref026 doi: 10.1067/mpa.2002.120170 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref017 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref038 doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00272-1 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref043 doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2004.12.016 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref027 doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00009-O – ident: S095252380623311X_ref006 doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2004.12.015 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref041 doi: 10.1017/S0952523804213372 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref014 doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2004.02.006 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref031 doi: 10.1007/BF00160771 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref045 doi: 10.1007/BF03399660 – ident: S095252380623311X_ref001 |
| SSID | ssj0013153 |
| Score | 1.9090759 |
| Snippet | We evaluated binocular summation, eye dominance, and learning in the
Trivector and Ellipses procedures of the Cambridge Colour Test (CCT).
Subjects (n = 36,... We evaluated binocular summation, eye dominance, and learning in the Trivector and Ellipses procedures of the Cambridge Colour Test (CCT). Subjects ( n = 36,... We evaluated binocular summation, eye dominance, and learning in the Trivector and Ellipses procedures of the Cambridge Colour Test (CCT). Subjects (n = 36,... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref istex cambridge |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 461 |
| SubjectTerms | Adolescent Adult Analysis of Variance Binocular summation CHROMATIC CODING Chromatic discrimination Color Perception - physiology Color Perception Tests - methods Color vision Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology Dominance, Ocular - physiology Eye dominance Eyes & eyesight Female Females Gender differences Humans Learning - physiology Male Photic Stimulation - methods Psychophysical detection threshold Rheumatoid arthritis Scholarships & fellowships Sensory Thresholds - physiology Sex Factors Vision, Binocular - physiology |
| Title | Absence of binocular summation, eye dominance, and learning effects in color discrimination |
| URI | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S095252380623311X/type/journal_article https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/6GQ-MT58ZZHS-J/fulltext.pdf https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16961981 https://www.proquest.com/docview/198320257 https://www.proquest.com/docview/68840773 |
| Volume | 23 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000240481500022&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1469-8714 dateEnd: 20171231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0013153 issn: 0952-5238 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 20010101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Health & Medical Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 1469-8714 dateEnd: 20171231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0013153 issn: 0952-5238 databaseCode: 7X7 dateStart: 20010101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Psychology Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1469-8714 dateEnd: 20171231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0013153 issn: 0952-5238 databaseCode: M2M dateStart: 20010101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/psychology providerName: ProQuest |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3fb9MwED6xFaG98GMDlg2KH9AeUCOSpo7tJ1TQxoTUasCQqvEQxY6DpkGyNR3a_nvuHKcFIfrCSx4SO0p8d_Z9vvN9AC-5LIbEOBDGsaYjOTIJVaE02hW3I7StkufSkU2I6VTOZurE5-Y0Pq2ymxPdRF3UhvbIXyM4JqpvLt5cXoVEGkXBVc-gsQE99JMlERhMhpNVECHmnkne4S3ZBTVdxWi8SfciXP6TmCo2rkor_LFE9Wi0b_7tf7p16OjBf_7BQ7jvHVA2bjXmEdyx1TbsjCsE3z9u2QFzKaFur30b7k185H0Hvo51Q5MAq0uGYLp26avMHX0j0Q6YvbWsqF1ijbEDllcF84wU35hPGmHnFaMi2XNGZ4FbPjHq_Bi-HB2evjsOPTFDaEaRXOBg6nyYSmm51sIi5ilUHlmLQjZ6xMsySTVRJZSRVlzpuECXNNWJlTrNlRrKMnkCm1Vd2V1gXKjcRCMtDfo1GrGZjYVBiMUNL0wRpwEMlnLJvHk1WZuaJrK_xBhA1IkuM77IOXFtfF_X5dWyy2Vb4WNd4wOnD8uW-fyCUuMEz9L3H7PJKZdnZ8efsw8B7HdK8NtndxoQwIvlUzRnitHkla2vmwxHFSG2SAJ42mrZ6ptShWBXxntr37wPW-0mEaVkPoPNxfzaPoe75ufivJn3YUPMhLvKPvTeHk5PPvWdzfwCgBsUqA |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Nb9QwEB2VFtFe-GhpGwrUB-gBbUS-HNsHhFZA2dLuCsRWWpVDiB2nWgFJ2WyB_VH8RzxOsgtC7K0HrkkcOfbzZMbzPA_gEeVZgIoDru9LPJLDQ1dkQpp1RXVk1lZOU27FJthgwEcj8XYFfrZnYZBW2dpEa6izUuEe-VMTHKPUN2XPL766KBqFydVWQaNGxbGefTcRW_Xs6KWZ3sdBcPhq-KLnNqICroo8PjWBl0yDmHNNpWTa-OuZSD2tTQeVjGieh7HEMv-5JwUV0s-MOxXLUHMZp0IEPA_Ne6_BmjHjDBlkbMQWSQufNsr1Nr7jbRLVVqg2F_GaZ9yN0McKkYtSDn_8Etdwdn_829-1_73DW__ZiN2Gm42DTbr1irgDK7rYhK1ukU7LLzNyQCzl1eYSNuFGv2EWbMGHrqzQyJEyJ3JclJaeS-zRPoRuh-iZJllpiUNKd0haZKRR3DgnDSmGjAuCRcAnBM8613pp2PgunF7JF2_DalEWehcIZSJVXiS5Mn6bNLGn9pkyISRVNFOZHzvQmeMgacxHldTUO5b8BRsHvBYqiWqKuKOWyOdlTZ7Mm1zUFUyWPXxg8Td_Mp18Quofo0n8-l3SH1J-dtZ7n7xxYK8F3W_dbhHnwP78rjFXmINKC11eVokZ1chjLHRgp0b1ok-xMME89-8tffM-rPeG_ZPk5GhwvAcb9YYY0k_vw-p0cqkfwHX1bTquJg_t2iTw8aqh_QudMG60 |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Nb9QwEB2VFlW98NFCCQXqA_SANiJfTuwDQivK0lJ2VUSRqnIIseOgFZCUzRbYn8a_Y8ZJdkGIvfXANYkjJ3kzmfE8zwN4yEUekOKA6_uKtuSI0JW5VGhX3ERoWwXPhBWbSEYjcXoqj1fgZ7cXhmiVnU-0jjqvNK2RP8HkmKS-MX8vWlbE8f7g2flXlwSkqNDaqWk0CDkys--YvdVPD_fxUz8KgsGLk-cHbisw4OrIE1NMwlQWxEIYrlRiMHbPZeYZg5PVKuJFEcaKWv4XnpJcKj_H0CpWoREqzqQMRBHifa_AWhJxTiY2DIaLAobPWxV7m-uJrqBqu1XjQTrmYegR-tQtctHW4Y_f4xp96R__jn3tP3Bw_T9-ezfgWht4s35jKTdhxZSbsNUvs2n1Zcb2mKXC2hrDJqwPW8bBFrzvq5qcH6sKpsZlZWm7zG75I0j3mJkZlleWUKRNj2Vlzloljo-sJcuwccmoOfiE0R7oRkeNBt-Cd5fyxLdhtaxKcwcYT2SmvUgJjfGcwpzU-InG1JJrnuvcjx3ozTGRtm6lThtKXpL-BSEHvA42qW6bu5PGyOdlQx7Ph5w3nU2WXbxnsTi_Mpt8IkpgwtP45Zt0eMLF2dnB2_SVAzsdAH-bdoc-B3bnZ9GNUW0qK011Uaf4ViMvSUIHthuEL-YUS0zyhX936Z13YR0Rnb4-HB3twEazTkas1HuwOp1cmPtwVX-bjuvJA2umDD5cNrJ_AQ9qd3g |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Absence+of+binocular+summation%2C+eye+dominance%2C+and+learning+effects+in+color+discrimination&rft.jtitle=Visual+neuroscience&rft.au=Costa%2C+Marcelo+FERNANDES&rft.au=Ventura%2C+Dora+FIX&rft.au=Perazzolo%2C+Felipe&rft.au=Murakoshi%2C+Marcio&rft.date=2006-05-01&rft.pub=Cambridge+University+Press&rft.issn=0952-5238&rft.eissn=1469-8714&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=461&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017%2FS095252380623311X&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK&rft.externalDocID=1457142281 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0952-5238&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0952-5238&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0952-5238&client=summon |